Language selection

Search

Patent 1124224 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1124224
(21) Application Number: 295966
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR REMOVING POLLUTANTS FROM CATALYST REGENERATOR FLUE GAS
(54) French Title: METHODE D'EPURATION DE GAZ PERDUS DE LA REGENERATION DES CATALYSEURS
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 252/1.F
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10G 11/02 (2006.01)
  • B01D 53/86 (2006.01)
  • B01J 21/04 (2006.01)
  • B01J 23/42 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FLANDERS, ROBERT L. (United States of America)
  • BLANTON, WILLIAM A., JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CHEVRON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-05-25
(22) Filed Date: 1978-01-31
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
786,724 United States of America 1977-04-11

Abstracts

English Abstract



ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
PROCESS FOR REMOVING POLLUTANTS
FROM CATALYST REGENERATOR FLUE GAS

Carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides are removed from
flue gas produced in a catalyst regenerator in as FCC system
and sulfur from the flue gas is shifted to form hydrogen
sulfide, which is recovered in the gases removed from the
cracking reactor in the system by reacting carbon monoxide
in the regenerator flue gas with oxygen in contact with a
particulate carbon monoxide combustion promoter, reacting
sulfur oxides in the regenerator flue gas with particulate
alumina physically mixed with the FCC catalyst to form a
sulfur-containing solid, and forming hydrogen sulfide in the
cracking reactor by contacting the sulfur-containing solid
with the hydrocarbon feed.



Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. In a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process wherein a
cracking catalyst is cycled between a cracking zone and a
catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon
stream is cracked in contact with said catalyst in said cracking
zone, and a sulfur-containing flue gas is formed in said
regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off said
catalyst With an oxygen-containing gas, the method for reducing
the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in said flue gas
which comprises:
(a) reacting carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon
dioxide in said regeneration zone in contact with a carbon
monoxide oxidation promoter comprising a metal or compound of a
metal selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium,
osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium;
(b) forming a sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid in said
regeneration zone by reacting sulfur trioxide with alumina, said
alumina being included in a particulate solid physically admixed
with said catalyst, said particulate solid being substantially
free from said metal or metal compound; and
(c) removing sulfur from said particulate solid and forming
hydrogen sulfide in said cracking zone by contacting said sulfur-
and aluminum-containing solid with said hydrocarbon stream.



2. In a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process wherein a
cracking catalyst is cycled between a cracking zone and a
catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon
stream is cracked in contact with said catalyst in said cracking
zone, and a sulfur-containing flue gas is formed in said
regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off said

- 26 -


catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, the method for reducing
the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in said flue gas
which comprises:
a) including in said catalyst a carbon monoxide oxidation promo-
ter comprising at least one metal, or compound of a metal,
selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium,osmium,
ruthenium, copper and chromium, and reacting carbon monoxide and
oxygen to form carbon dioxide in said regeneration zone in con-
tact with said promoter;
b) forming a sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid in said re-
generation zone by reacting sulfur trioxide with alumina, said
alumina being included in a particulate solid physically admixed
with said catalyst, said particulate solid being substantially
free from said metal or metal compound; and
c) removing sulfur from said sulfur- and aluminum-containing
solid and forming hydrogen sulfide in said cracking zone by con-
tacting said sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid with said
hydrocarbon stream.


3. A method according to Claim 2 wherein a sufficient
amount of said particulate solid is admixed with said catalyst to
provide between 0.1 and 25 weight percent alumina, with respect
to said catalyst.


4. A method according to Claim 2 wherein said metal is
platinum.


5. A method according to Claim 3 wherein said catalyst
includes between 0.01 to 100 parts per million, by weight, of

platinum, calculated as the elemental metal.



27



6. In a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process wherein a
cracking catalyst is cycled between a cracking zone and a
catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon
stream is cracked in contact with said catalyst in said cracking
zone, and a sulfur-containing flue gas is formed in said
regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off said
catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, the method for reducing
the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in said flue gas
which comprises:
(a) reacting carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon
dioxide in said regeneration zone in contact with a carbon
monoxide oxidation promoter comprising a metal or compound of a
metal selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium,
osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium, said promoter being
associated with a first particulate solid, said first particulate
solid being physically admixed with said catalyst;
(b) forming a sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid in said
regeneration zone by reacting sulfur trioxide with alumina, said
alumina being included in a second particulate solid being
substantially free from said promoter metal or metal compound;
and
(c) removing sulfur from said second particulate solid and
forming hydrogen sulfide in said cracking zone by contacting said
sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid with said hydrocarbon
stream.



7. A method according to Claim 6 wherein a sufficient
amount of said second particulate solid is admixed with said
catalyst to provide between 0.1 and 25 weight percent alumina,
with respect to said catalyst.

- 28 -



8. A method according to Claim 6 wherein said metal is
platinum and a sufficient amount of said first particulate solid
is admixed with said catalyst to provide between 0.01 and 100
parts per million of platinum, by weight, calculated as the
elemental metal, with respect to said catalyst.



9. A method according to Claim 6 wherein said carbon
monoxide oxidation promoter includes 0.01 to 20 weight percent of
said metal, calculated as the elemental metal.



10. A composition of matter comprising a physical mixture
of:
(1) particulate cracking catalyst;
(2) a first particulate solid comprising an inorganic oxide
associated with 0.01 to 2 weight percent platinum or a platinum
compound, calculated as the metal, said first particulate solid
being in admixture with said catalyst in an amount sufficient to
provide 0.01 to 100 parts per million, by weight, of platinum,
with respect to said catalyst; and
(3) a second particulate solid comprising at least 60
weight percent alumina, said second particulate solid being
substantially free from platinum, and said second particulate
solid being in admixture with said catalyst in an amount
sufficient to provide 0.1 to 25 weight percent alumina, with
respect to said catalyst.

- 29 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


llZ4~24


BACKGROUND OF THE INV~N ION
2 This invention relates to a method for reducing the
3 amount of carbo~ monoxide and sulfur oxides in the flue gas
4 produced in a catalyst regenerator in a fluid catalytic cracking
system.
6 ~odern hydrocarbon catalytic cracking systems use a
7 moving bed or fluidize~ bed of a particulate catalysmhe
8 cracking catalyst is subjected to a continuous cyclic ~racking
9 reaction and catalyst rege~eration procedu_e. In a fluidized
catalytic cracking t~CC~ system, a stream of hydrocarbon fe~d is
11 contacted with fluid~zed catalyst particles in a hyd.ocarbon
12 cracki~g zone, or reactor, usually at a temperatu-e of about 800-
~ 11COaFo The reactions o~ hydrocarbons in the hy2rocarbon stream
14 at this temperature rasult in deposition of carbonaceous coke on
the catalyst particles. The resulting fluid p~oducts are
16 thereafter s~parated from the coked catalyst and ara withdra~n
17 from the crac~ing zone. The co~ed cat~lyst is then stripped of
18 volatiles and is passed to a catalyst rQgeneration zone. In the
19 catalyst regsnerator, the coked catalyst is contactsd with a gas
containing a controlled amount of molecular ox~gen to burn off a
21 desired p~rtion of the coke from the catalyst amd simultaneously
22 to heat the catalyst to a high temperatu-s dQsired when tha
23 catalyst is again contacted with the hydrocarbon stream in the
24 cracking zone. ~fter regeneration, the catalyst is returned to
the crac~ing zone, where it is used to vaporize the hydrocarbons
26 and to catalyze hydrocarbon crac~ing. The fluê gas formed by
27 combustion of co~e in the oatalyst regenerator is separ~tely
28 remo~ed from the regenerator. This flue gas, whlch may be
29 treated to remove particulates and carbcn mor,oxide from it, is
normally passed into the atmosphere. Ccncern with control of

31 pol1~tants in flue gas has resulted in a sea~ch for ~mproved

-- 2 --

~.~ Z~224


1 methods for cont.olling such pollutants, particularly sulfur
2 oxides and carbon monoxide.
3 The amount of conversion obtained in an FCC cracking
4 operation is the volume perc~nt of fresh hydrocarbon feed changcd
to gasoline and lighter products during the conversion step. The
6 end boilirg point of gasoline for the purpos~ of de~ermining
7 conversion is convqntionally defined as 430F. Conversion is
8 often used as a measure of the severity of a commercial FCC
9 operation. At a given set of operatîng conditlons, a ~re active
catalyst gives a greater conversion than does a less active
11 catalyst. The a~ility to provide higher conversion ir ~ given
12 ~CC unit is d~sirable in that it allows ~hs FCC urit to be
13 operated in a more flexible manner. Feed throughput in the unit
14 can be increased, or alternat vely a higher degree of conversion
ca~ ~e maintainsd with a constant feed throughput rate.
16 The hydrocarbon feeds prccessed ln commercial ~CC units
17 normally contain sulfur, usually termed "feed sulfur". It has
18 been found that about 2-105 or more of the faed sulfur in a
19 hydrocarbon feedstream processed in an FCC system is lnvariably
tra~sferred from the feed to the catalyst particles as a part of
21 the coke formed on.the catalyst particles during cracklng. The
22 sulfur deposit6d on tha ca~alyst, herein te med "coke sulfur"~ is
23 eventually cycled from the conversion zone along wlth the coked
24 catalyst into the catalyst regenerator. Thus, about 2-10% or
more of the sulfur in tbe hydrocarbon f~ed is continuously passed
26 ~ro~ the cracking zone into the catalyst regeneration zone in the
27 coked catalyst. In an FCC catalyst regenerator, sulfur contained
28 in the co~e is burned along with the coke car~on and hydrogen,
29 forming gaseous sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide, ~hi_h ar_
conventionally re~oved from ths regenerator in the flue gas.


-- 3 --

4224

1 ~ost of the feed sulfur does not become coke sulfur in
2 the cracking reactor. Instead, it is ccnverted either to
3 normally gaseous sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide and
4 car~on oxysul~ide~ or to normally liquid organic sulfur
S compaunds. These organic sulfur compounds are carried along with
6 the vapor products and recovered from the cracking re2ctor.
7 ~out 90% or more of the feed sulfur is thus continuously removed
8 from the cracking reactor in the stream of processed, cracked
9 hydrocarbo~s, ~ith abou~ 40-60% of t~is sulfur being in the form
of hydrogen sulfide. Provisions are conventionally made to
11 recover hydrogen sulfide from the ef.luent from the cracking
12 reactor. Typically, a very-lo~-molecular-weight off-gas vapor
13 straam is separa~ed from the C3+ l~guid hydrocarbons in a gas
14 recovery unit, and the off-gas is treated, as by scrubbing il
~i h an amine solution, to remove the hydrogen sulfide. Removal
16 of sul~ur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide from the fluid
17 effluent from an FCC cracking reactor is relatively simpl~ and
18 inexpensive compared to removal of sulfur oxldes ~rom an FCC
19 reganerator flue gas by conventional methods. ~oreover, l all
the sulfur ~hich must ~e recovered ~rom an FCC opera~ion could be
21 recovered in a slngle recovery operation pe~form6d on 'he reactor
22 off-gas, the use of t~o separate sulfur recovery operations in an
23 FCC unlt could be obviated.
24 It has been suggested to diminish the amount of sulfur
oxides i~ PCC regenerator flue gas by desulfurizing a hydrocarbon
26 feed in a separate desulfurization unlt prior to cracking or to
27 desulfurize the regenerator flue gas its~lî, by 2 conventio~al
28 flae gas desulfurization proccdure, after removal from th~ FCC
29 regenerator. Cl2arly, ~oth of the foregoing alternativcs require
elaborate, extraneous processi~g operations and entail large
31 capi~al and utilities expenses.




-- 4 --

~L~242Z4

1 If sulfur normally removed from the FCC unit in ths
2 regenerator flue gas as sulfur o~ides is instsad removed from the
3 cracking reactor as hydrogen sulfide along ~ith the procassed
4 cracked hydrocarbons, the sulfur thus shifted to the reactor
5 effluent is then simply a a small addition to the large amount of
6 hydrogen sulfide and organic sulfur already invariably present in
7 the reactor effluent. Ihe small adaed expense, if any, of
8 removing even as much as 5-15~ more hydroger. sulfide from an FCC
9 reactor off-gas by available means is substan.ially less than the
expense of separate feed desulfurization or flue gas desulfuri-
11 zation to reduce the level of sulfur oxides in the regenerator
12 flue gas. ~ydrogen sulfide recovary systems used lr. present
13 commercial FCC units normally have the capacity to remove
14 additional hydrogen sulfide from the reactor off-gas. Pr~sent
off-gas hydrogen sulfide reco~ery facilities could no~mally
16 handle any additional hydrogen sulfide which would be added to
17 the off-gas if the sulfur normally in the regsnerator flue gas
18 were substantially all con~er~ed to hydrogen sulfide in the FCC
19 reactor off-gas. It is accordi~gly desirable to direct substan-
tially all feed sulfur into the fluid cr~cksd products rQmoval
21 pathway from the cracking reactor and reduce the amou~t of sulfur
22 oxidcs in the regsnera~or flu~ gas.
23 It has been suggested, e.g., in U.S. Patant 3,699,037,
24 to reduce t~e amount cf sulfur oxides in FCC regenerator flue gas
by adding particles of Grou~ ~IA metal oxides and/or carbonates,
26 such as dolomite, ~gO or CaCo3, to the ci_cula+ing catalyst in an
27 FCC unit. The Group IIA metals react ~ith sulfur oxides in the
28 flue gas to form solid sulfur-containing compounds. The Group
29 IIA metal oxides lack physical strengthl and regardless of the
size of the particles introduced, they are rapidly r^duc~d to
31 fi~es by attrition and rapidly pass out of the ~CC uri' with tne




-- 5 --

~1242'Z4


1 catalyst fines. Thus, addition of dolomite ~nd the like Group
2 IIA materials is a continuous, once through process, and large
3 amounts of material must be employed, in order to rsduce the
4 level of flue gas sulfur o~ldes for any significant period of
tima.
6 It has also bee~ suggest~d, e.g., in ~.s. Pat-ent
7 3,835,031, to reduce the amount of sulfur oxides in an FCC
8 regenerator flue gas b~y impregnating a Group IIA metal ~xida onto
9 a conventional silica-alumina cracking catalysThe attrition
problem encountered whsn using unsupported Group II~ metals ls
11 thereby reduced. However, it has beer. found that Group IIA metal
12 o~idas, such as mag~esia, when used as a component of cracking
13 catalysts, have an undesirable effect on the activity and selec-
14 tiYity of the cracking catalysts. The addi~ion of a Group IIA
mçtal to a cracking catalyst results in two particularly
16 noticeable adverse consequences relative to the results obtained
17 in cracking without the presence of tha Group IIA metals: (1)
18 the yield or the liquid hydrocarbon fractio~ is su~stantially
19 reduced, typically by greater than 1 volume percent of the feed
-20 volume; and (2) the octane rating of the gasoline or naphtha
21 fraction (75-430F boiling ra~ge) is substantially reduced.
22 Both of the above-noted adverse consequences are seriously detri-
23 me~tal to the economic viability of an FCC cracking operation and
24 eve~ complete removal of sulfur oxides from regener~tor flue gas
would not compensate for the losses in yield and octane ~hich
26 result from adding Group IIA metals to an FCC catalyst.
27 Alumina has ~een a component of mar.y FCC and o~her
28 cracking catalysts; bu~ primarily in intimate chemical
29 combination with silica. Alumina itself has low acidity and i5
generally considered to be undesirable for use as a cracking
31 catalyst. The art has taught that alumina is not selecti~e,
.. .
-- 6 --

42Z~

1 i.e., the cracked hydrocarbon products recovered from an FCC or
2 other cracking unit using an alumina catalyst would not be
3 de~ired valua~le products, but would include, for example, rela-
4 tively large amounts of C2 and lighter hydrocarbon gases.
~he conventional type of FCC catalyst reganer~tion
6 curren,ly used in most systems is an incomplate combustlon mode.
7 In such systems, referred to herein as "standard regQneration"
8 systems, a substantial amount of coke carbon is left on
9 regenerated catalyst passed from the FCC regsneration z~ne to the
cracking zone. Typically~ regenerated catalyst contains a
11 substantial amount of coka carbon, i.e., more than 0.2 ~eight
12 percent carbon, usually about Q.25 to 0.45 weight perce~t carbon.
13 The flue gas remored from an FCC regenerato. operating 1~ a
14 standard regeneratio~ mode is characterized by a relatively high
carbor. monoxide/carbon dioxide concentration rztio. Th~
16 atmosph~re in much or all of the regeneration zone is, ~ver-all,
17 a r~ducing atmosphere because of the presence of substantial
18 amounts of unburned cok~ carbon and carbon ~or.oxide.
19 In general, reduci~g the level of carbon on regsnerated
cata~yst below about 0.2 weight percent has been di-ficult.
21 Until recently, there has been little incentive 'o attempt to
22 remove substantially all coke carbon from the catalyst, slncs
23 eYen a fairly high carbon content has had little advsrse effect
24 on the activity and selectivity of amorphous silica-alu~ina
catalysts. Most of the FCC cracking catalysts now used, ho~evar,
contain zeolites, or molscular sieves. Zeolite-containing
27 catalysts have usually be6~ found to have rsla'ively highar
28 activity and selectivity when their coke carbon content after
29 rege~eration is relatively low. An incentive has thus ~risen for
attempti~g to reduce the coke content of regen2ratsd FCC cztalyst
31 to a v6ry lo~ level, e.g., b610w 0.2 ~eight percent.
..
-- 7 --

~LlZ4;~:Z4

1 Several methods have been suggested for burning sub-
2 stantially all carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide during
3 regeneration, to avoi~ air pollution, recover heat and prevent
4 afterburning. Among the procedures suggested for use ln
obtaining complete carbon monoxide combustion 'n an FCC regens-
6 rator have been: (1) increasing the amount of o~ygen introduced
7 into the regenerator relative to standard regeneration; and
8 eitber (2~ increasing thé average opsrating temperature in the
9 regenerator or (3) including vari OQS carbon monoxide oxidation
promaters in the cracking catalyst to promots carbon monoxide
11 burning. Various solutions have also been suggested for the
12 problem of afterburning of carbon monoxide, such as addition of
13 extraneous comDustibles or use of ~ater or hsat-accepting solids
14 to absorb the heat of combustion of carbon monoxide.
1~ ~hen using carbon monoxide combustlon promoters hereto-
16 fore commercially available, such as Group VIII noble m2tals in
17 PCC catalysts, to provide complste carbon mono~ide combustion, it
18 has been fou~d quits dif~icult to maintain the amount of coke on
1g regenerated catalyst at a~ acceptably low level. Promoter
materials when added to t~e catalyst have been been found to
21 provide adequats C0 combustion in many cases, but have not been
22 ~ell accep~ed commercially because o~ the resul~ing high level of
23 coke on regenerated catalyst, which has lo~ered conversion.
24 Complete combustion systems using an unusually high
temper~ture in the catalyst reganerator to accompllsh comp1~te
26 carbon monoside combustion are also not altogether satisfac~ory.
27 Some of the heat generated by carbon monoxide ccmbus+.ion is lost
28 i~ the flue gas, because CO combustion takes place essentially in
29 a dilute catalyst phase in an after-burning mode, and high
temperatures can permanen~ly adversely affect the activi~y nd
31 selectivity of the FCC catalyst.


-- 8 --

~Z4;~:24

1 Several types of addition of Group VIII noble metals
2 and other carbon monoxide combustion pro~oters to PCC systems
3 haYe been suggested in the art. In ~.S. ~atent 2,647,860 i~ is
4 prop~sed to add 0.1-1 welght percent chromic o~i~e to ~n FCC
catalyst to promote ccmbustion of carbon monoxide to carbon
6 dioxide and to prevent afterburning. ~.S. Patent 3,364,136
7 proposes to employ particles containing a small pore (3-5 A.3
8 molecular sieve ~it~ which is associated a transitior metal from
9 Groups IB, IIB, VIB, VII3 and YIII of the Deriodic Table, or
compounds ther~of, such as a sulfide or oxide. Represen~ative
11 matals disclosed include chromium, nicke1, iron, molybdenum,
12 cobalt, platinum, palladium, copper and zi~c. The metal-lo~ded,
13 small-pore zeolite may be used in an PCC system in physical
14 mixture with cracking catalysts containing larger-pore zeolites
active for crac~ing, or the small-pore zeolite may be ~ncluded in
16 the same matrix witA zeolites active for crac~lr.g. The small-
17 pore, metal-loaded zeolites are supplied for the purpose of
18 incr~asing the C02/C0 ratio in the flue gas produced in the FCC
19 regenerator. In ~.S~ ~atent 3,788,977, it is proposed to add
uranium or platinum impregnated o~ an ~norganic oxide such as
21 alumi~a to an ~CC system, either in physical mixture ~it~ FCC
22 catalyst or incorporated into the same amorphous matrix as a
23 zeolite used for cracking. Uranium or platinum is added for the
24 purpose of producing gasoline fractions having high aromatics
conter.ts, and no effect on carbon monoxide combus.ion ~h~n using
26 the additive is discussed in the patent. In ~.S. Patent
27 3,808,121 it is propos~d to supply larg~-siz2 particles of a
28 carbon monoxide ccmbustion promoter in an ~CC regenerator. The
29 snaller-size catalyst particles are cycled between the FCC
crac~ing reactor and the catalyst regenerator, while, because of
31 their sizQ, the larger promoter particles r~main in 'he
,

g _


l~ Z~Z4

1 regenerator. Carbon monoxide oxidation proinoters such as cobalt,
2 coppe., nickel, manganese, copper chromite, etc., impregnated on
3 an inorga~ic oxide such as alumina are disclosed fo. use.
4 Relgian patent publication 820,181 suggests using catalyst
particles con~aining Flatinu~, palladium, iridium, rhodium,
6 osmium, ruthenium or rhenium or mixtures or compounds ~hereof to
7 promote carbon monoxide oxidation in an FCC catalyst regenerator.
8 ~n amount between a trace and 100 ppm of the active metal is
9 added ~o FCC catalyst oar'icles by incorpora.ion during ca+alyst
manufacture or by addition of a compound of the metal t~ the
11 hydIocarbon fsed to an FCC unit using the catalyst. Th~
12 publication notes that addition of the promoter metal increases
13 coke a~d hydrogen format~on during cracking. The catalyst
14 containing the promoter m~tal can be used as such or can be added
1~ in physical mi~ture with unpromoted FCC cracklng catalyst.
16 Applicants' smployer and/or affiliates thereof
17 purchased quantites of particulate additiqes from catalys~
18 ma~ufacturers. The additives were sold by the manufacturers for
19 the purpose o~ introducing the additives into circulation in
admixture vith FCC catalyst in FCC uni+s to promote combusticn of
21 carbcn monoxide during catalyst regeneration ir the ur.its.
22 Arplicants' employer and/or affillatos thereof used the additives
23 in their commercial FCC operations. One such additive ~as
24 understood to contain a mixture of platinum-alumina oarticles and
silica-alumina particles~
26 SUWWARY OF TH _INV~NTION
27 In an embodi~ent of the invention e~ployed in a
28 cataly~ic hydrocarbon cracking process wherein a cracking
29 catalyst is cycled betveen the cracking zone and a catalyst
regeneration zone, a sulfur-containir.g hydrocarbon stream is
31 cracked in contact w th the catalyst i~ the cracking zone, and a

-- 10 --

~L~Z4;~2~
carbon monoxide-containing and sulfur-containing flue gas is
formed in the regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke
off the catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, the invention
relates to a method for reducing the amount of carbon monoxide
and sulfur oxides in the flue gas, which eomprises: reacting
carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide in the
regeneration zone in contact with a carbon monoxide oxidation
promoter comprising a metal or compound of a metal selected from
platinum, palladium, iridium,rhodium,osmium, ruthenium, eopper
and ehromium; forming a sulfur and aluminum-containing solid in
the regeneration zone by reaeting sulfur trioxide with alumina,
the alumina being included in a seeond partieulate solid
physically admixed with the eatalyst, and the seeond partieulate
solid being substantially free from the noble metal or metal
eompound; and removing sulfur from the reaetant and forming
hydrogen sulfide in the eraeking zone by eontaeting the sulfur
and aluminum-eontaining solid with the hydroearbon stream.
In one more limited embodiment of the method of the
invention, the carbon monoxide combustion promoting metal is
incorporated into the cracking catalyst itself, and an alumina-
containing particulate is physieally mixed with the promoted
eatalyst and the mixture is eireulated in a eraeking system.
In another more limited embodiment of the method of the
invention, the earbon monoxide eombustion promoting metal is
ineorporated in a first partieulate solid while the alumina for
removing sulfur oxides is ineorporated in a second particulate
solid, with both the first and seeond particulate solids being
physically mixed with the craekinq eatalyst, and the resulting
three-component mixture is eireulated in a eraeking system. It
is preferred that the earbon monoxide oxidation promoter
ineludes from 0.01 to 20 weight pereent of the metal, ealeulated


B

~24224
as the elemental metal.
In another embodiment, the present invention relates
to a composition of matter comprising a physical mixture of:
(1) particulate hydrocarbon cracking catalyst; (2) a first




- lla -

~L~Z~2Z~

1 particulate solid comprlsing an inorganic o~ide associa~ed ~ith
2 0.01 to 2 weight percent platinum or a platinum compouna,
3 calculated as the metal, the first particulate solid being in
4 admixture with the catalyst in an amount sufficient to p ovide
0.01 to 100 parts per million, by ~eight, of platinum, ~ith
6 respect to the catalyst; and (3) a second particulzte solid
7 comprising at least 60 ~eight percent alumina, the second
8 particulate solid being substantially free from platinum, and the
9 second particulate solid being in admixturs with the catzlys, in
an amount sufficient to provide 0.1 to 25 wQight percent alumina,
11 ~ith respect to the cztalyst.
12 We have found that the use of a partlculate carbon
13 moroxide com~ustion promoter containing a metal or metal compound
14 very active for C0 combustion promotion in conjunction ~ith the
use of particulate alumina for reaction with sulfur oxides in
16 regenerator flue gas provides a synersistic metho2 for re~oving
17 both car~on monoxide and sulfur oxides from the regenera~or flue
18 gas. 3y proceeding according to a preferrsd embodiment of the
19 method of the invention, it is possible to add exac~ly ~he
desired amount of C0 combustion promoter to burn the exactly
21 desired amount of carbon monoxide in the flue gas, and likewise
22 to add exac'ly the d~sired amount of alumina reactant to provide
23 a titrated amount of sulfur oxides removal ~rom the reganerator
24 flue gas~ Advantages of adding the separate promoter particles
and alumina reactant particl~s include the ability to change the
26 mode of opQration in relation to carbon monoxide combustion or to
27 sulfur oxides ~emoval without recourse to changing the ~hole
28 catalyst inventory of a catalytic crac~ing unit.
29 DETAILED_DFSCRIPTIC~ OF 'rH:E INV_NmION
The present invention is used in connection ~ ~h a
31 fluid catalyst cracklng process for crzc~ing hydrocarbon feeds.

-- 12 --

l~.Z4Z2~

1 The same sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feed normally pr~c~ssed i~
2 ccmmercial FCC systems may be processed in z cracking systsm
3 employing the present invention. Suitabl~ fsedstocks i~clude,
4 for exa~ple, gas oils, light cycle oils, heavy cycle oils, atc.,
vhich usually contain about 0.1-10 ~eight percent sulfur~ Sulfur
~ay be present in the feed as a thiophene, disulfide, thioether,
7 etc. Suitable feedstocks normally boil in the _ange from about
8 400-1100~ or higher. A suitable feed may incIude recycled
9 hydrccarbons which have already been cracked.
~he cracking catalyst employed may be a conventional
11 particulate cracking catalyst including silica and aiunina. The
12 catalyst nay be a conventional amorphous cracking catalyst
13 containing a mlxture of silica and alumina, or more preferably
14 the catalyst may be conventional zeolite-containing cra_king
1~ catalyst including a crystalline aluminosilicate zeolite
16 associated with an amorphous matrix which is generally sillca-
17 alumina. Th~ amorphous matrix generally const-tutes 85-95 weiqht
18 percent of tha cracking cata~yst, with the remaining 5-15 ~eig~t
19 percent bei~g a zeolite component dispersed on or embedled in +he
matrix. The zeolite may be rare earth-exchanged or hydrogen
21 exchanged. Conventional zeolite-contalning cracking catalysts
22 often include an X-type zeolite or a Y-type zeolite.
23 Cracking conditions employed in the cracking ~r
24 conversion step in an FCC system are frequently provlde~ in part
by pre-heating or heat-excha~gir.g hydrocarbon feeds to bring them
26 to a temperature of about 600-750F before introducing them into
27 the cracking zone; ho~ever, pre-heating of the feed is not
28 essential. Cracking conditions include a catalys+/hydrocarbon
29 weight ratio of about 3-10. A hydrocarbon weigh. space velocity
i~ th cracking zo~e of about 2-50 per hour is preferably used.
31 The average amount of coke contained in the catalyst after
,.
- t3 -

~L12~24

1 contact ~ith the nydrocarbons in the cracking zone, when t.he
2 catalyst is passed to the regenerator, is preferably bet~een
3 about 0.5 ~eigh~ percent and about ~5 weight percent, depsnding
4 in part on the carbon content of regensrated catalyst in ~he
particular system, as ~ell as ths heat ~alanca of the pa~icular
6 system.
7 The catalyst regeneration zone used in an FCC system
a empl~ying an smbodiment of the present invention may be of
9 conventional design. The gaseous atmosphere inside the
regeneration zone is normally co~prised of a mixture of gases in
11 concentrations which vary according to tha locus withln the
12 rsgensrator. The concentrations ~ f gases also ~ary acco-di~g to
13 the coke concentration on catalyst particlss entering the
14 regenerator and according to the amount of molecular oxygen and
steam passed into the regeneralor. Generally, the gaseous
16 atmosphere in a regenerator contains 5-25~ steam, varying amounts
17 of o~ygsn, carbon mono~ide, nitrogen, carbon dioxider sulfur
18 dioxide, a~d sulfur trioxide. I~ order ~o facilitate rsmoval of
1~ sulfur conten.s from the regenerator flus gas ~ithin the regenC-
rator according to the invention, it is prsfer_ed that rslatively
21 coke-free particles containing active alumina must contact ths
22 gaseous regenerator at~osphere at a locus at ~hich the atmosphere
23 contains sulfur trioxide or molecular oxygen and sulfur dioxids.
24 In rege~erators of conventional design, the flue gas includes the
desired components ar,d catalys' rormally contac~s the flue gas at
26 this point, af~er havlng been freed of a substzn.ial amount of
27 coke. ~hen regeneratcrs of this type are e~ploycd, contact
28 between relatively coke-free alumina-containlng ?artlcles and the
29 oxygen ar.d sulfur dioxide or sulfur trioxide is fac_litated.
According to one aspect of the i~ventlon, a carbon
31 ~onoYide combQstion promoter is em~loyed ln an FCC system. The
~.
- 14 -

l~.Z4224

1 carbon monoxide combustion promotsrs which are suitable for use
2 according to the inv~ntion are the metals platinum; palladium,
3 iridium, rhodium, os~ium, ruthenium, coppsr and chro~ium, or
4 compounds thereof, such as the oxides, sulfides, sulfates, etc.
S At least one of the foregoing metals or metal compounds is used,
6 and miYtures of two or more of the metals are also suitable. For
7 example, mixtures of platinum and palladlum or copper and
8 chromium are suitable. Tha effect of +he abo~e-mentioned carbon
9 monoxids com~ustion promoter metals may be enhanced by _ombining
them with small amounts of other mstals or metalloids, particu-

11 larly rhenium, tin, ger~anium or lead.
12 The carbon monoxide com~ustion promotar is employed ln
13 the PCC system in cne or both of two ~ays: (1) the promoter is
14 incorporated, preferably at a very small concantration, int~ the
ECC catalyst or into a substantial port-on (a.g., more than 10~)
16 of t~e FCC catalyst, as by impregnation, ion exchznge, etc.; or,
17 more preferably, (2) the promoter is prasent in the system in
18 association with a relatively small a00unt of a particulate solid
19 other than the catalystt such as particles Oc alumina, silica,
etc., suitable for circulation in an FCC system, o- the promoter
21 is present in an insubstantial portlon (e.g., lass than S~ and
22 preferably less than 1~) of the FCC catalyst particles, with ~he
23 promoter metal thus being present in physical mixture with all or
24 substantially all of the FCC catalyst. When used in th~
preferred physical mixture with the FCC catalyst, the promo'-r
26 matal is preferably prase~t in a particulate solid in a
27 relatively high concentration. Howe~er, the over-all
28 concentratio~ of the promoter with raspect to the total catalyst
29- is comparable to the amount used ~hen the promoter is added to
the catalyst itself.




- 15 -

Z~ZZ4


1 Irrespective of whether the promoter employed is
2 incorporated in the FCC catalyst or is incorporated in a separate
3 particulate solid physically mixed with the catalyst, the total
4 amount of promoter ~etal added to the system is preferably
sufficient to promote combustion of most or su~stantially all of
6 the carbon ~onoxide produced in an FCC regenerator.
7 Platinum is a partlcularly preferred promoter for use
8 in the present method. The total amount of platlnum added to an
9 FCC systam, if the platinum is present on the catalys~ itself, is
preferably ~atween about 0.05 and 20 ppm (weight), vith respect
11 to the total amount of catalyst in the system. In the preferred
12 case in which the platinum is prese~ on only a small fraction of
13 particles in the sys~em~ i.e., when +he platinum s located on
14 the particulate solid physically admixed wi~h the FCC catalyst,
it is preferred that the total amount of platinum added ~o an FCC
16 system ~e bet~een about 0.01 and 100 parts ~er million, by
17 weight, with an amount between about 0.1 and 10 parts per million
18 bei~g particularly preferred, Yith respec~ 'o the total amount of
19 catalyst in ths system. It will be apparent that the amount o.
platinum present in a given discrete particle added to an FCC
21 system will be greater when fewer particles containing the
22 promoter are added. ~he concentration of platinum can range u2
23 to 2 weight percent, or higher, if desired, in cases where a very
24 small number of particulate, platinum-containing materlal is
added .o an PCC system. Preferably, however, +he amount of
26 plati~u~ added to a particulate solid is kept a+ less than 1
27 ~elght percent of the total welght of the particles. An amount
28 of platinum added to discrete solids of a~out 0.01 to 1 weight
29 percent of the total ~eigh+ or the discre.e solids is a prefsrred
range for use.


- 16 -

~L~ Z42;~:4

1 The amount of Group VIII noble metals other than
2 platinum is generally between about 2 times to 10 times higher
3 total concentration in the system, ~ith respect to the total
4 amount of catalyst, than is us~d when a platinum promoter is
employed. Thus, the amoun~ of the Group VIII metal such as
6 palladium, iridium, etc., car~ be calculated from the foregoing
7 description of the concentratlon of a platinum promoter, at least
8 twice as much and preferably S times as much of other Group VIII
9 ~o~le metals is used. The concentratio~ of 'he other Group VIII
noble metals on any discrete particle in the FCC system is
11 usually kept below about 2 ~eight percent, and prefe~ably belo~
12 about 1 ~eight percent.
13 Th~ amount of copper used in an FCC system as a
14 promoter is generally about 100 to about S000 times higher total
concentration in the system, with respect to the to~al amount of
16 catalyst used, than the amount of platinum which would be used in
17 the same system. The concentration of copper promoter sn any
18 discrete particle is usually kept below about 20 weight parcent,
19 and preferably below about 10 weight percent.
Ths a~ount of chromium used in an FCC system ~s a
21 promoter is generally bet~een about S00 and about 25,000 times
22 hig~er total concentration in the system, with respect to th~
23 total amount of catalyst, than the amount of p1atinum which wou~d
24 be employed in the same system. The conce~tration of chromium
added in, e.g., a chromium compound impregna~ed on any discrete
26 particle in the FCC system is usually kept belov about 20 welght
27 percent of the total particle weight, and pref~rably below abou.
28 10 weight per cent.
29 ~he-promoter metal, o~ metal compound, can be added to
the ECC catalyst itself. It is, however, preforred to add th~
31 promotsr metal to the FCC system in a form which is associated




- 17 -

l~ Z~24

1 with a discrete particulate solid, which is physically admixed
2 with the FCC catalyst in circulation in the system. The
3 particulate solid to be mixed with the catalyst can be any
4 material whi~h is suitable for circulat~on in ar FCC system in
S particulate form in admixture with the catalyst. Particularly
6 suitable materials are the porous inorganic o~ides, such as
7 alumina and silica, or mixtures of two or more inorga~ic oxides,
8 such as sil-ca-alumina, natural and synthetic clays znd the like,
9 crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites, etc. Gamma alumina is
particularly good. The promoter metal can be 2dded to a
11 particulate solid in any suitable manner, as by impregnation or
12 ion exchange, or can be added to 2 precursor of a particulate
13 solid, as by coprecipitation from an aqueous solutlon ~ith an
14 inorganic o~ide precursor sol. The particulate solid can be
formed into particles of a size suitable for use in an FCC system
16 by conventional means, such as spray-drying, crushing of larger
17 particles to ths desired slze, etc.
1 a A particulats solid which contains at least one
19 promoter metal or metal compound of the type mentioned bove can
be admixed with the bulk of FCC catalyst prior to charging the
21 catalyst to an FCC un~t. Likewise, the particulats solld
22 containing a promoter can be added to an PCC unit separately fro~
23 the catalyst in the desired amount.
24 ~hen the promoter metal is employed in the system, a~d
particularly ~hen the promoter metal is present in a relatively
26 high co~centration in a particulate solid physically admixed ~lth
27 the cracklng catalyst, it is preferred to perform at least a
28 major portion of the combustio~ of all carbon mono~id- in th
29 catalyst regenerator in a dense catalyst phase ,egion witnin the
regenerator. By a dense catalyst phase region, is mean~ that 'he
31 catalyst de~si~y in the region is at least 10 pounds per cubic
32 ~ foot.
- 18 -

~i~24~Z4L

1 Particularly when using a separate particulate promot~r
2 physically mixed with the cracking catalyst, it ls also preferred
3 to introduce sufficient oxygen into the regsneration zone in an
4 FCC system so that a minimum molecular oxygen content of 0.5
volume percent, and preferably at least 1.0 volllme percent, is
6 mai~tained in the atmosphere in the regeneraticn zone.
7 Particularly when using a separats particulate promoter
8 physically mixed with the crac~ing catalyst, it is also preferred
9 to burn a sufficient amount of ccke off the catalyst in the
tO regeneration zone so that the average concentration of carbon in
11 regenerated catalyst cycled from the regeneratlon zons to the
12 crac~ing zone is belo~ 0.2 weight p~rcent.
13 Purther according to the ir.vention, sulfur oxldes are
14 removed from the flue gas in an FCC regeneration ~one by reacting
sulfur trioxide with alumina in the regensration zone. The
16 aIumina used for the reaction has a surface area Oc at least 50
17 m2/g, e.g., gamma- or eta-alumina. Suitable alumina is not in
18 intimate com~ination ~ith more than 40 weight percent silica, and
19 preferably is substantially free from admixture wlth silica.
Alumina from any particular sou-ce is suitable for use ln the
21 present method if it cortains an average of abcut 0.1 to 100
22 weight percent of "reactive alumina", as detsrmined ~y t eating
23 particles containing the alumina by the followl~g steps:
24 (1) passing a stream of a gas mixtur~ contain~ng, ~y
2~ volume, 10~ ~ater, 1% hydrogen sulfide, 10~ hydrogen ~nd 79~
26 nitrogen over the solid particle continuously at a temperature of
27 1200P and atmospheric pressure until the weight of the soll d
28 particle is suDstantially constant;
2g (2) passing a strezm of a gas mix~ure contalning, ~v
volume, lG% ~ater, 15~ carbon dioxide, 2% oxygen and 73% nitrog~n
31 over the solid particle resulting from step (1) at ~ t~?erature

- 15 -

~12~224

1 of 1200F and at~ospheric pressure until tha we1ghL of the solid
2 particle is substantially constant, the ~eight of the particle at
3 this time being designated "Na"; and
4 (3~ passing a stream of a gas mixture containing, by
volume, 0.05% sulfur dioxide, and, in addition, the same gases in
6 the same proportions as used in step (2), over the solid particle
7 rasulting from step (2) at a temperature of 1200F and
8 at~ospheric pressure until the weight of the solid pariicle is
9 substantially constantr the weight of the solid particl~ at this
time ~eing designated "Ws~'.
11 The weight fraction of reactive alumina in ths solid
12 particle, designatad "Xa", is determine2 by the formula
3 Xa = ~s_~a ~ Mole_ul~ t _AlUm__a _
14 ~a 3 x Molecular ~t. Sulfur Trio~ide
~he alumina used is included in a particulate solid
16 suitable for circulaticn in an FCC system. Sui+able par'icles
17 normal1y ~ust have a~ alumina content of at least 60 weight
18 perce~t and, preferably, the alumina cont-nt of ~he particlqs is
19 90 ~eight percent or more.
In a preferred embodlment, particles of gamma-alumina
21 are used. Alumina can be formed into ?articles of suitable size
22 for circulation ~ith PCC catalyst in an FCC system by spray-
23 drying, crushing larger particles, etc.
24 The alu~ina is added to an FCC system and circulated in
physical mixture ~ith an FCC catalyst. The amount of alumina
26 added is preferably more than 0.1 welght percQnt and less than 25
27 weight percent of the total amount of catalyst clrculating i~ the
28 FCC system. The addition of an amount of alumina betwee~ 1.0 and
29 15 weight percent of the total catalys+ inveutory is particularly
preferred. The size, shape and density of the alumina-cont~ining
31 particles used in the process is preferab1y regula.ed tc provide


- 20 -


~.242Z4
1 particles which circulate in substantially ~he same manner as the
2 catalyst particles.
3 The added alumina reactC with suifur trioxid~ or sulfur
4 dioxide and oxygen in the FCC catalyst regenerator to form at
S least one solid compound includi~g sul~ur and aluminum, such as a
6 sulfate of aluminum. In this ~ay, sulfur oxides are removed fro~
7 the regenerator atmosphere and are not removed from .he
8 regenerator in the flue gas.
9 Particles co~taining the solid aluminum- and sulfur-
containing material are passed to the cracki~g zore in ~he FCC
11 system along ~lth the catalyst. In the cracking zons, alumina is
12 regenerated and hydroger sul~ide is formed by contacting the
t3 sulfur-containing solid with the stream of hydrocarbon being
14 treated in the cracker. In addition to forming hydrogen sulfide,
the reaction bet~een the sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid
16 and the hydrocarbon feed may produce some other fluid sulfur
17 compcunds such as carbonoxysulfide, organic sulfides, etc. Th3
18 result-ng vapor sulfur compounds exit the crackir.g zone as a part
19 of the stream of cracked hydrocarbons, along ~ith the fluid
sulfur compounds formed directly from sulfur in the hydrocarbcn
21 reed. Off-~as subsequently separated from the crack~d
22 hydrocarbon stream thus includes hydrogan sulfide formel direc+ly
23 from the feed sulfur and hydrogen sulfid~ formed by rea_tion of
24 the sulfur- and aluminum-containing solid with thê hydrocarbon
strea~ in the cracking zone.
26 It is essential to operation cf the present invention
27 that the parti~les which contain alumina to be rezcted ~ith
28 sulfur trioxide in the regenerator must be substantially rr~e
29 from zuy of the promoter metals or metal compoun2s described
above for USê in carbon monoxide cc3bustion promotion, tha~ is,
31 platinum, palladium, lridlu~, rhcdium, csmium, ruthenium, copper
~..
- 21 -

~.24;224


1 and chromium~ It has been found that ths presence of these
2 metals or compounds thereof i~ alumina-containing particlas to be
3 used for reaction with sulfur oxides is actually detrimen~al to
4 the capacity ol the a1umina to fo-m solld sulfur-containing
materials in an ~CC regenerator. Thus, when .hese metals are
6 presen~ on particles of alumina to be reacted ~ith sulfur
7 trio~ide, the desired reaction of ths sulfur trloxide to form a
8 solid is impaired, a~d larger amounts of sulfur oxides exit the
9 FCC regenerator in the regenerator fluo gas, contrary to the
object of the invention. Thus, the metal promo~ers disclosed,
11 although essential to operation of the invention, must be used in
12 a particulate solid in physical mixture ~ith th~ alum na which is
13 reacted with sulfur o~des. The promotor metals may, thus, De on
14 (1~ the FCC catalyst, or, preferably (2) on separate particles
physically mixsd vith the FCC catalyst and with the sulfur oxides
16 controlling alumina particles.
17 Further acccrding to the invsntion, 2 composition o
18 matter is provided for use according to the method of the
19 in~ention described above. In a broad aspect, the composition
includes a physical mi~ture of: (1) particulate cracking
21 catalyst; (2) a first particulate solid containlng a promoter
22 metal; and (3) a second particulate solid free from the promotsr
23 metal and containing at least 60 weight percent alumi~a.
24 Praierably, the composition includes a physical mixture of three
componants. Pi-st, particulate cracklng catalyst. Second, the
26 composition includes a first particulate solid comprisi~g an
27 inorganic oxide such as alumina or silica-alumina associated ~ith
28 0.01 to 2 ~eight percent plztinum or a platinum compound, wnerein
29 the amount of platinum is calcalated on tho basis o~ the
elemer.tal metal. Ths flrst particulate solid is in admixture

-31 with the cracking catalyst in an amount sufficient ~o p.o~lde a

1~.24;Z24

1 total of 0.01 to 100 Farts per million, by weight of platinum,
2 with respect to the weight amount of catalyst in the co~position.
3 Third, the composition includes a second pa-ticulate soli~
4 comprising at least 60 weight percent, and prererably 90 weight
percent, alumina. The seco~d particulate solid is substantially
6 free from platinum. The second solid is included in admi~ture
7 with the cracking catalyst in an amount sufficiert to provide a
8 total of 0.1 to 25 ~eight p6rcent alumina in the composition ~ith
9 respect to ihe ~eight amount of catalyst in the composition.
The composition mi~ture according to the invention car.
11 be formed by mixing the three components and the mixtur_ can be
12 employed by char~ing ~t to a catalytic cracking system in the
13 same manner in which crac~i~g catalyst ls normally char~ed to the
14 system. Alter~atively, the composition can be formed in a
ca~alytic cracking system by separately charging the com~onents,
16 or one of +he components to an FCC system and forming the mixture
17 of tha three components ~ithin ths FCC system.
18 The follo~ing illustrative embodiment describes a
19 preferred ambodiment of the operation of 'he present invention.
ILI.USTRATIVE E~BODIM NT
21 A conventional FCC system and eguilibrium, zeolit~-
22 containing, crac~ing catalyst of a commercially available type
23 are employed for cracking about 19,000 barrels per day of a
24 hydrocarbon feed having a boiling range of about 580F to about
1100P. The hydrocarbon feed contains about 0.8 weigh' Dercent
26 feed sulfur. The cracking zone used contains a combination of
27 riser cracking and dense-bed cracking modes. Cracking conditions
28 employed include a reactor temperature of abou~ 920F, a hydro-
29 carbon veight hourly cpace velocity of a~ou 5 per hour and a
conversion rate (defined as percent of feed cor.verted to 430F
31 and lighter comporents) of about 85~. ~he averagc amoun~ of coke
.~
- 23 -

~.24ZZ~

1 on spent catalyst is about 1.5 weight percsnt. ~he coke on spent
2 catalyst includss about 0.7 weight percent sulfur. The amount of
3 carbon o~ regenerated catalyst is about 0.5 ~sight percent. The
4 flue gas e~iting the catalyst regenerator includes about 650
parts per million (volume) sulfur oxides (calculated as sulfur
6 dioxide~, about 0.3 vclume percent oxygen, and has a C0/CO2 ratio
7 of about 0.6. Catalyst r~generation conditions used in the
8 regenaration zone include a temperature of about 1200F.
9 Catalyst is circulated continuously bet~een the cracking zone and
regeneration zone at the rate of about 16 tons per minute, ~ith a
11 total catalyst inventory in the systsm of about 180 tons.
12 According to the inv6ntlon, a particulate solid
13 consisting essentially of gamma alumina is added to the catalyst
14 in circulation in the unit in an amount sufficient to provide 10
~eigh~ percent alumina, with respect to the total ~eight of
16 catalyst in the system. The alumina employed is a commsrci~lly
17 aYailable ~ype which which has been sp~ay-dried to provils
18 particles of tAe same size and fluidizable properties as the
19 catalyst. The alumina employed has a surface area of about
180m2/g. Aftsr the circulation of alumina is equilibrated, the
21 amount of sulfur oxides, calculated as sulfur dioxide, in the
22 flue gas exiting _he catalyst regene.ator is agai~ measured and
23 is found to be l~ss than 200 parts par million (volume). Alumina
24 is t~ereafter continuously added to the unit to retain about 10
veight percent alumina in admixture with the FCC catalyst, to
26 replen~sh any alumina lost ~y normal a.trition.
27 Further according to the in~en~ion, 60 pounds of
28 particles containing 0.6 ~eight ?ercent pla+inum ~.~pregnated on
29 a~ alumina carrler are introduced into circulation in the FCC
unit along ~ith the catalyst. Introduction of the platinum-
31 alumina particles is then corltinued at the rate of about 7 pou~ds

~.
- ~4 -

42~

1 per day. ~he amount of platinum added to the sys+em is thereby
2 mai~tai~ed at an equilibrium level of about 5 parts per million,
3 by ~eight, with respect to ths total amou~t o~ catalyst in the
4 system. Most of the oarbon monoxide is burned in a dense
catalyst phase region in the regenerator. A sufficlent amount of
6 oxygen is added to the regenerator to provide at least 0.5 volume
t percent o~ygen in the regenerator atmosphere. After addition of
8 both the alumina sulfur-oxides-reactant particles a~d the
9 platinum-alumina carbon-monoxide-combustion promoter par icles,
the CO/C02 ratio and sulfur oxides level in the flue gas exiting
11 the regeneration zone are measured. The CO/C02 ratio ls found to
12 be substantially reduced to below 0.005, while the sulfur oxides
13 level, calculated as S~2, is found to have further decr~ased tO
14 below 50 parts per ~illion (volume).
~s can be sesn from the foregoing illustrative
16 embodimsnt, the method cf the present invention provides a simple
17 and economical method for controlling both the amount of carbon
18 monoxide and the amount of sulfur oxides present in flue gas
19 removed from an FCC catalyst regenerator. A large numb-r of
variations, modifications and equivalents of the embodiment
21 illustrated will be appar~nt to those skilled in the art and are
22 intended to be included withi~ the scope of th~ appended cl~ims.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1124224 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-05-25
(22) Filed 1978-01-31
(45) Issued 1982-05-25
Expired 1999-05-25

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1978-01-31
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CHEVRON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-02-16 1 7
Claims 1994-02-16 4 152
Abstract 1994-02-16 1 34
Cover Page 1994-02-16 1 14
Description 1994-02-16 25 1,122