Language selection

Search

Patent 1129208 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1129208
(21) Application Number: 333490
(54) English Title: COMPACT DRESSING TOOL
(54) French Title: OUTIL COMPACT POUR LE DRESSAGE DES MEULES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 51/130
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B24B 53/12 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HENRY, ROBERT L. (United States of America)
  • SKINNER, FRANK R. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: ECKERSLEY, RAYMOND A.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-08-10
(22) Filed Date: 1979-08-09
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
937,218 United States of America 1978-08-28

Abstracts

English Abstract


60 SD-100

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A dresser tool comprises two composite compacts
positioned to crush and shear the grinding wheel. Preferably
one composite compact is arranged such that its working edge
contacts the grinding wheel tangentially; and the other
compact is placed so that its working edge is normal to the
grinding wheel at a rake angle ranging from positive to
negative.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclu-
sive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. An improved multi-point dressing tool for grinding
wheels comprising a shank portion and a nib and having at least
two composite compacts positioned on the nib wherein a composite
compact comprises:
(a) a mass comprising at least 70 volume percent of
an abrasive selected from the group consisting of diamond and
cubic boron nitride particles which are bonded together and
wherein there is crystal-to-crystal bonding in the case of
diamond, and which mass is bonded to;
(b) a substrate mass of cemented carbide selected
from the group consisting of tungsten, titanium, and tantalum
carbides;
wherein the improvement comprises a dressing tool
having a first composite compact with a leading abrasive edge
and a second composite compact with a leading abrasive edge,
said first composite compact being positioned on said nib such
that its leading edge contacts the rotating surface of the
grinding wheel tangentially to crush the wheel and said
second composite compact being positioned such that its leading
edge is normal to the grinding wheel surface to shear the wheel.
2. The improved dressing tool of claim 1, wherein,
said first and second composite compacts present edges in a
substantially orthogonal relationship.
3. The improved dressing tool of claim 2 wherein
said second composite compact is set at a positive rake angle.
4. A double action dressing tool for a grinding
wheel comprising
(a) a body defining a nib said nib having first,
second, and third composite compacts extending therefrom;
(b) wherein a composite compact comprises: (1) a mass
of at least 70 volume percent of an abrasive selected from the


group consisting of diamond and cubic boron nitride particles
bonded together wherein there is crystal-to-crystal bonding
in the case of diamond, and which mass is bonded to; (2) a
substrate mass of a cemented carbide selected from the group
consisting of tungsten, titanium, and tantalum carbides;
(c) said first and third composite compacts each
presenting an elongate abrasive working edge to tangentially
contact and crush the grinding wheel periphery; and
(d) said second composite compact presenting a
working edge transverse to the direction of wheel rotation to
shear the grinding wheel.
5. A method of dressing a grinding wheel comprising
the steps of rotating the grinding wheel about its axis;
contacting the wheel with a first working edge of an abrasive
member having first and second working edges, said first working
edge being aligned substantially parallel to the direction of wheel
rotation and moving said first working edge across the wheel to
cause a crushing action; and contacting the wheel with the second
working edge of said abrasive member, said second working edge
being aligned substantially perpendicular to the direction of wheel
rotation and moving said second working edge across the wheel
surface to cause a shearing action.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein said shearing
action step is performed prior to said crushing action step.


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Z~

This invention relates to methods for dressing
grinding wheels and, more particularly, relates to dresser tools
of abrasive compacts.
Dressing may be defined as any operation performed
on the face of a grinding wheel that improves its cutting
action. Trueing is a dressing opexation but is more precise,
i.e., the face of the wheel may be made parallel to the
spindle or made into a radius or special shape. Regularly
applied trueing is also needed for the accurate size control
of the work, particularly in automatic grinding.
Opening is another dressing operation and refers to
the breaking away of the bond material from around the
abrasive particles in a wheel thereby exposing them for grinding.
new wheel is initially opened and may have to be period-
ically opened thereafter to expose new particles when the
previously exposed particles have been dislodged or dulled
and to remove grinding swarf, which may accumulate during
grinding, from around the abrasive particles.
Reference can be made to Machinery's Handbook
(20th Ed. 1976) pp. 1992 to 1994 for a listing of commonly used
dressing tools and methods for their use. One common type is
a single point diamond tool having a granular shaped diamond
mounted at one end of a tool shank. Dressing is performed
with such a tool by engaging the periphery of a rotating wheel
with the cylindrical handle of the tool disposed at a
negative angle of 10 to 15 relative to a line drawn
perpendicular to a tangent to the wheel periphery at the point
of engagement of the tool with the wheel. This is equivalent
to a negative back rake angle of about 55 to 60. The tool
is also occasionally rotated about its longitudinal axis to
prolong diamond life by limiting the extent of the wear facets
and also to produce a pyramidal shape of the diamond tip.

- 1 -

~2~;~8


It is also comn~Dn to use a dresser having
a plurality of individual diamon~smounted in an array,
e.g., straight line, across the nib of the dresser.
These dressers are generally referred to as multi-point
or cluster type. In use, the dresser is canted at
an angle of 3 to 10, bringing two to five individual
diamond points into contact with the grinding wheel.
The multiple points often permit faster cross feed rates
than the single point dresser.
While the prior dresser tools are generally
considered to be satisfactory, manufacturers are
always concerned with improving the grinding process,
such as by improving the wheel life, wheel cutting
speed, surface finish on the workpiece produced by
the grinding wheel, dressing tool life and dressing
speeds.
Present dressing techniques "gla~e" the
grinding wheel slightly to produce a smooth surface
finish. This produces a poor cutting wheel that "burns"
the object during grinding. It is desirable that the
grinding wheel be both "free cutting" and capable of
producing a smooth surface finish. "Free cutting"
refers to a grinding wheel's capability of rapidly
removing material from a workpiece and requiring low
cutting energy input from -the grinding machine. But
the present technology, has no-t been able to meet the two




~' J - 2 -

2'~8

~old criteria o~ free cutting and smooth surface finish
because of the trade off inherent in the present dresser tools.
Accordingly, it is a feature of this invention to
provide a dressing action which enhances and improves the
grinding process in these areas.
Another feature of this invention is to provide an
improved dressing tool particularly applicable for dressing
grinding wheels which will grind workpieces and improve both
free cutting and smooth surface finish characteristics.
The dresser tool of the present invention includes at
least two composite compacts which are positioned on the tool
nib to contact the rotating surface of the grinding wheel
tangentially to crush the wheel and substantially normal to
shear the wheel. With this structure, two action dressing is
accomplished. The order of application of shearing and
crushing across the wheel may be varied depending upon the
results desired. The shearing compact may be disposed at a
negative, positive or zero rake angle.
In its broader aspect the present invention involves
a method of dressing wherein an abrasive body is used in
succession to crush and shear. The abrasive body may be
w ~tzi tic
' diamond, cubic or ~iar-~itic boron nitride composite compacts
or cluster compacts, a macle diamond or cemented carbide
compacts.
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a double action
dressing tool in accordance with the present invention;
Figures 2A, 2B and 2~ are fragmentary cross-
sectional views, typically taken along line AA in Figure 1,
showing the shearing compact set at zero, positive, and
negative rake angles, respectively;

Figure 3 is a schematic view of the double action
dresser tool being applied to a rotating grinding wheel; and


1129Z~8

Figure 4 is alternative embodiment of an
oscillatory, double action dressing tool.
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment
in many di~ferent forms there is shown in the drawings and
will hereinafter be described in detail a preferred embodiment
of the invention, and modifications thereto, with the
understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered
as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and
is not intended to limit the invention to the embodiments
illustrated.
A dresser tool 10 of this invention is shown in
Figure 1. Tool 10 includes a shank or handle portion 12 and
a head nib 14. Two composite compact blanks 16 and 18 are
carried or embedded or otherwise attached to the nib 14
and extend therefrom. The configurations of the shank 12 and
head nib 14 are illustrative and other shapes well known in
the art are also useful as well.
A cluster compact is defined as a cluster of
abrasive particles bonded together either (1) in a self-bonded
relationship, (2) by means of bonding medium disposed between
the crystals, (3) by means of some combination of (1) and
(2). Reference can be made of U.S. Patent No. 3,136,615 -
dated June 9l 1964 - Bovenkerk et al; U.S. Patent No. 3,141,746
- dated July 21, 1964 - DeLai and U.S. Patent No. 3,233,988 -
dated February 8, 1966 - Wentorf Jr. et al for a detailed
disclosure of certain types of compacts and methods for
making same.
A composite compact is defined as a cluster compact
bonded to a substrate material such as cemented tungsten
carbide. A bond to the substrate can be formed either during
or subsequent to the formation of the cluster compact.

Reference can b~ made to U.S. Patent No. 3,745,623 - dated


July 17, 1973 ~ ntorE Jr. et al; and U.S. Patent No.
3,~
,4~-~ - dat~d ~uly 10, 1973 - Cristal and U.S. Patent No.
3,767,371 - dated October 23, 1973 - Wentorf Jr. et al for a
detailed disclosure of certain types of composite compacts
and methods of making same.
The term cemented carbide as used herein means one
or more transitional carbides of a metal of Groups IVb, Vb,
and VIb of the Periodic Table cemented or bonded by one or
more matrix metals selected from the group iron, nickel and
cobalt. A typical cemented carbide contains WC in a cobalt
matrix or TiC in a nickel matrix.
Each of the composite blanks 16 and 18 can include
a laminar substrate 16A and 18A of cemented carbide and an
abrasive mass or layer 16B and 18B. Abrasive layer 16B may be
comprised of an abrasive selected from the group consisting
of diamond, cubic boron nitride (CBN), wurtzite ni-tride (WBN,
and mixtures of two or more of the foregoing. Examples of
suitable compo~ite compacts sold by the General Electric
Company under the designations: COMPAX ~ Industrial Diamond
Tool Blanks (polycrystalline diamond on a cemented carbide
substrate) and BZN Compacts (CBN crystals on a cemen-ted
carbide substrate).
Composite blank 16 is a relatively long blank and
is positioned with its abrasive layer 16B in a generally
vertical orientation, as viewed in Figure 1, whereas blank 18
is shorter and positioned with its abrasive layer 18B in a
generally horizontal orientation.
The functions of the blanks 16 and 18 may be best
understood with reference to Figure 3 which shows the typical
application of tool 10 to the surface of grinding wheel 20
which is xotating in the direction indicated. Tool 10 is
moved in two directions, namely, into and laterally across


l~Z~Z~B

the surface of the wheel 20. Blank 16 functions to crush the
grinding wheel and blank 18 shears the wheel.
The long blank 16 extends beyond the wheel contact
region as shown in Figure 3. The action of the long blank 16,
because of contact angles, crushes the grinding wheel. This
function breaks bond posts in bonded wheels, exposing new
grains of abrasives and fractures existing exposed grains.
The short blank 18 is positioned substantially near
the grinding wheel contact radius. The short blank 18 shears
the wheel grains establishing exact grinding wheel diameter
and a "free cutting" state. The short blank rake angle may
be zero, positive or negative as shown in Figures 2A, 2s and
2C, respectively. Rake angle refers to the angle of engagement
of dresser tool with the grinding wheel as measured from the
tool table as a plane of reference. A table of a dressing
tool is the tool surface against which chips of the grinding
wheel bear as they are severed. In any rake orientation the
leading abrasive edge of blank 18 is essentially orthogonal
to the leading abrasive edge of blank 16.
In this manner the working edge of compact 16
engages the wheel surface aligned substantially parallel to
the direction of wheel rotation and compact 18 engages the
wheel surface with its working edge substantially transverse
to the direction of wheel rotation. The working edge of
compact 18 should engage the wheel surface at a position adjacent
to the point of tangency o~ the working edge of compact 16
to the wheel surface.
The double action (crush-shear) tool lU can be used
two ways, depending upon which blank 16, 18 crosses the wheel
20 first during dressing. If the long blank 16 precedes the
short one 18, crushing and then shearin~, a smooth, stable,
free~cutting wheel surface will be produced. The action of

3LlZ~ 8

the short blank 18 will dimensionally stabilize the wheel 20
and open it a bit, especially if the blank is used at a
positive rake.
If the tool 10 is used with the short blank 18
preceding the long blank 16, shearing is the predominant
dressing mode. However, tool wear is greater for the short
blank, exposing more of the long blank to the wheel and causing
a crushing action. Dimensional control is excellent, but
dimensional stability drops due to broken bond posts during
the crushing action.
Figure 4 shows an alternative tool 10' which is
especially useful for surface grinders and other machines where
the tool 10' oscillates making several dressing passes across
the grinding wheel. Tool 10' employs two crushing blanks 26
and 28 and one shearing blank 30. Composite compact blanks
26, 28 and 30 are embedded in or attached to nib 24 and
include respectively, substrate 26A, 28A, 30A and abrasive 26B,
A 28B, 30B, as described above. The structure of tool 10' assureS
that a crushing blank 26 or 28 will always precede the shearing
blank 30 as the tool is oscillated across the face of the
grinding wheel.
The orientation of blanks 26 and 30 may be rotated
180 from that shown in Figure 4. Blank 28 should be oriented
as shown. Blank 30 may, of course, have a positive, zero, or
negative rake angle as shown in Figures 2A-2C.
While the invention has been discribed in terms of
illustrative tools, it is clear that in its broadest aspects
the invention also includes a method of dressing wherein a
abrasive is passed in a controlled orientation in successive
passes across a grinding wheel to crush and shear. Thus, while
this method may be conveniently practised with the use of a

pair of blanks, Figure 1, or three blanks, when oscillation



-- 7 --

1129~8

is used, Figure 4, it is possible to practise the method with
a single blank.
The single blank method would include contac-ting the
grinding wheel with the blank oriented substantially parallel
to the direction of wheel rotation to crush during the first
pass (as blank 16, Figure 1).
The second pass would subject the wheel to a shearing
action by rotating the abrasive 90 about the tool handle axis
and moving it across the wheel surface. As discussed
previously, the order of the first and second pass may be
reversed.
The abrasive may be of a cluster compact or composite
compact of diamond/ cubic boron nitride, or wurtizitic boron
nitride or a macle diamond (a thin, triangular shaped natural
diamond in combination with a long needle-shaped crystal), or
cemented carbide compacts.
These and other modifications may be made by these
skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit
of the present invention as pointed out in the appended claims.




-- 8 --

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1129208 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-08-10
(22) Filed 1979-08-09
(45) Issued 1982-08-10
Expired 1999-08-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1979-08-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-02-22 1 27
Claims 1994-02-22 2 83
Abstract 1994-02-22 1 13
Cover Page 1994-02-22 1 11
Description 1994-02-22 8 323