Language selection

Search

Patent 1129441 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1129441
(21) Application Number: 343153
(54) English Title: ALUMINOUS REFRACTORY COMPOSITION CONTAINING CARBON, SILICON AND CHROME OXIDE
(54) French Title: SUBSTANCE REFRACTAIRE ALUMINEUSE CONTENANT DU CARBONE, DU SILICIUM ET DE L'OXYDE DE CHROME
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 261/25
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C04B 35/10 (2006.01)
  • C04B 35/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RECHTER, HAROLD L. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CHICAGO FIRE BRICK COMPANY (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-08-10
(22) Filed Date: 1980-01-07
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
88,549 United States of America 1979-10-26
17,270 United States of America 1979-03-05

Abstracts

English Abstract



ALUMINOUS REFRACTORY COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING
CARBON, SILICON AND CHROME OXIDE
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A composition blending carbon with powdered chro-
mium oxide in an alumina or aluminum silicate matrix, includ-
ing silicon metal powder to inhibit carbon oxidation, is more
advantageous in resisting molten iron and slags than refrac-
tories based on carbon or chrome additions not combined. The
resultant refractory mixes are suitable for all conventional
application methods.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




THE CLAIMS
1. In a refractory composition comprising alumina
or aluminum silicate refractory material, carbon and powdered
silicon, the improvement of having chromic oxide and carbon
present in the composition in amount sufficient to give greater
resistance to slag over that of aluminous composition in which
chromic oxide and carbon are absent, said carbon being present
in up to about 35%



2. The composition in accordance with Claim 1 in
which the alumina or aluminum silicate is present in at least
10% , the chromic oxide is present in 5-30%, the carbon is
present in 5-35% and the silicon metal is present in 5-25%.



3. The composition of Claim 2 in which the alumina
or aluminum silicate is present in 10-75% by weight.



4. The composition of Claim 3 in which a binding
agent of plastic clay is present.



5. The composition of Claim 1 in which the carbon

is graphite.



6. The composition of Claim 1 in which the aluminous
material is present in at least 40% alumina.

12



7. A refractory composition comprising

Image

8. The refractory composition of Claim 1 wherein
the said composition is a plastic suitable as a ramming mix
and comprises alumina or aluminum silicate aggregate, coal tar
pitch, clay and aluminum sulfate.



9. The refractory composition of Claim 1 wherein
the said composition is a gunning mix and the composition com-
prises alumina or aluminum silicate aggregate, calcium alumin-
ate cement, kyanite and bentonite.



10. The refractory composition of Claim 1 wherein
the said composition is suitable for vibration placement and
the composition comprises alumina or aluminum silicate ag-
gregate, kyanite and coal tar pitch.

13




11. The refractory composition of Claim 1 wherein
the composition is a granular ramming mix and the composition
comprises alumina or aluminum silicate aggregate, phosphoric
acid and clay.



12. The refractory composition of Claim 1 wherein
the said composition comprises alumina in the form of cal-
cined bauxite.



13. In a refractory composition comprising alumina
or aluminum silicate refractory material, carbon and powdered
silicon, the improvement of having chromic oxide and carbon
present in the composition in amount sufficient to give
greater resistance to slag over that of aluminous composition
in which chromic oxide and carbon are absent.



14. The composition of Claim 13 wherein the alu-
minous material comprises an alumina aggregate containing
at least 40% alumina.



15. The composition of Claim 13 wherein the car-
bon is graphite.




16. The composition of Claim 13 wherein the sili-
con is present in amount sufficient to inhibit the oxida-
tion of the carbon.

14


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


112~




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION


1. Field of the invention.
Thc invention relates to an improvement in alumin-
ous refractory compositions containing carbon and silicon,
the tcrm carboll including ~morphous carbon and graphite.


2. Description of the Prior Art.
The excellent ability of aluminous r~fractories
containinO carbon to withstand erosion by molten iron and
slag is well Icnown and such materials arc con~lonly used to
advantage in iron-ulakin~ oundry and blast furnace facilities,
particularly in tap hol.e and iron and slag spou.t ar~as.


The usual. carbon refractory materials exhibit tlle
disadvantage of rapid o~idation at temperatures above 900 F
limiting theLr working life. Patents 3,810,768; 3,8;~6,14i~;
3,842,760 and 3,923,531, in which applicant is one of the in-

ventors, disclose the combination of powdered silicon me~aLwith carbon along with aluminous refrac~ory material to in-

hibit G~idation and improve mechanical properti.es. Tbese
carbon refractories also exhibit slag resistance, but their



slag resistance is limited by the fact that increasing the
carbon content increases oxidation so that there is a prac-
tical limit to t'ne amount of carbon that may be used in the
composition, generally less than 50% and usually not sub-
stantially higher than 35% by weight.


High alumina-chromic oxide compositions are dis-
closed in Manigault U.S. Patents 3,888,687 and 3,948,670.
These compositions do not contain carbon in the form of
graphite or otherwise. There is no disclosure of the value
10 of chromic oxide in increasing slag resistance and it is
believed that such compositions without carbon are relatively
ineffective in improving resistance against contact with
basic slag compounds.


It is an object of my invention to obtain improved
slag resistance without excessige high carbon content in
aluminous-carbon refractory compositions.



SUMMAR~ OF THE INVENTION


I have found that the addition of chromic oxide to
an aluminous refractory composition containing carbon and
20 silicon is more advantageous in resisting molten iron and
slags, especially basic slags, than refractories based on
carbon or chrome additions not combined. The improvement is
essentially in having the chromic oxide and carbon present in

the aluminous composition in amount to give greater resistance
to slag over that of aluminous compositions in which the


--2--


chromic oxide and carbon are absent. The improvement is es-
pecially important in compositions containing up to about 35%
carbon.


The composition may contain as low as 10% of alumina
or aluminum silicate, but preferably an alumina or clay aggre-
gate is used containing a minimum of 40% alumina or aluminum
silicate. A~ounts of alumina or aluminum silicate up to 75%
and even higher may be used depending upon the amount of carbon,
chrome oxide, silicon metal and other ingredients present.


The chrome oxide may be present in 5-30% by weight,
the carbon in 5-35% and the silicon metal in 5-25% or in
amount sufficient to substantially inhibit oxidation of the
carbon.


Compositions containing more than 35% by weight of
carbon are of good slag resistance without the addition of
chromic oxide although some slight improvement exists by the
addition of chromic oxide at above 35% carbon such as, even
as high as 50-75% carbon. However, such high carbon composi-
tions do not have~ the strength of lower carbon compositions
20 so that this invention of using not more than 35% carbon, such
as 5-35% carbon with 5-30% chromic oxide, has the advantage of
high strength with the same or better slag resistance of the
high carbon compositions.


The compositions are therefore essentially comprised

of alumina or aluminum silicate, carbon, chromium oxide and
silicon metal.


~%~

The materials are mixed ~or use in the form of par-
ticles which may vary from fines to coarse particles. A mix-
ture of coarse particles or grains is referred to herein as an
aggregate, for example an alumina aggregate.


Binders such as a plastic clay, coal tar pitch,
phosphoric acid and the like are preferably present in the
mix or may be added later. Where the original mixture con~
tains aluminous material in the form of a plastic aluminum
silicate clay with or without calcined clay, this plastic clay
10 may serve both as the aluminous material and the binder.


The aggregate aluminous grains can be selected for
a wide choice of materials including calcined clays, calcined
bauxites, fused or tabular aluminas, i.e., aluminum silicates
to pure aluminum oxides. The aggregate component can be of
1/2 inch siæe maximum graded to finer sizes. Preferably max-
imum grain sizing is 3/8 inch by downs with 75% of the aggre-
gate coarser than 20 mesh and at ].east 90% over 100 mesh.
The coarsest grain size can be as fine as 1/16 inch, but thi.s
will not be as protective of the carbon component as aggre-
20 gate in the 1/4 to 3/8 inch range.


The carbon content may be in the form of amorphous
carbon or natural or synthetic graphite. Grain sizing may
start as coarse as 1/~ inch by downs or coarser, but the bulk
of it is preferably -30 mesh.



~ he chromic oxide is preferably present as the ses-
quioxide (Cr203)-and -is preferably of the pigment grade for


4~3~

maximum effectiveness, that is, essentially sub-micron. How-
ever, even coarser sizing has effectiveness, as for example,
100 mesh and coarser.


Silicon metal powder is added as an oxidation in-
hibitor for the graphite and suitably may be -20 mesh, pref-
erably finer.


Also, there may be included in the composition clays
useful for workability, green binders for prefired strength,
coal tar pitch for reduced penetrability and increased carbon
10 content. High alumina fines produce the most advantageous
matrix, having at least 60% alumina content and grain sizing
or -200 mesh, preferably -325 mesh. Further additions such as
for extending shelf life of chemical bonded formulations or
wetting agents are not precluded by suggested compositional
ranges.


The refractory products made according to this des-
cription may be in the form of ramming plastics, pressed
shapes, drier granular ramming mixes, castables, gunning
mixes, hand patching plastics, and vibration placement mixes.


The method of application determines grain sizing,
water content, and type and amount of clay addition.



Our preferred range of formulation can be summar-
ized as follows (dry basis):


% by weight
Alumina or aluminum silicate aggregate 20-52
High alumina fines, -200 mesh 0-12
Carbon or graphite 5-35
Silicon metal powder 5-25
Chromic oxide 5-30
Fine plastic clays 0-15
Coal tar pitch 0-10
Green binders (lignosulfonates or aluminum sulfate) 0-7
High alumina cement 0-25
10 Phosphoric acid or aluminum phosphate 0-8
Water would be added in most cases, varying from
about 12% for patching mixes, 10% for plastics, 5% for gra~u-
lar ramming mixes, 3% for prewetted gun mixes to dry for cast-
ables.



DET~ILED DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


The following examples are provided to show a range
of products intended by this invention.


EXAMPLE 1


A ramming plastic formulation was prepared as follows:
% by wei~ht
Calcined bauxite (1/4" by downs) 47
-325 mesh calcined alumina 9
-30 mesh Mexican graphite 12
Pelletized coal tar pitch 5
Plastic ball clay 2
Western bentonite 6

Silicon metal powder 8
Chromi-~m oxide 8
Aluminum sulfate 3

1~2~9~1

Water was added to give a final moisture content of 10%.
This product has been manufactured by extrusion and slicing,
placed into cartons, and has performed remarkably well against
foundry slags over a wide variety of basicities.


EXAMPLE 2
A granular ramming mix was prepared as follows:
% by weight
Calcined bauxite (1/4" by downs)51
-325 mesh calcined alumina 8
Mexican graphite (1/4" by downs)11
Plastic ball clay 8-1/2
Silicon metal powder 6-1/2
Chromium oxide 8-1/2
Phosphoric acid (75%) 6-1/2
Water was added to give a final moisture level of 6%. An ad-
dition of approximately 0.25% of citric acid can provide ex-
tended working life, particularly in warm environments.


EXAMPLE 3
A gunning mix was formulated as follows:
% by wei~ht
Calcined bauxite (1/4" by downs)54
Chromium oxide 8-1/2
Silicon metal powder 6
Calcium aluminate cement (~70% A1203) 8-1/2
Mexican graphite ~1/4" by downs)12-1/2
Western bentonite 2
- - -100 mesh kyanite 8-1/2



--7--

~4~1

This material is bagged dry, but can be prewetted with 3%
water addition just prior to gunning.


EXAMPLE 4
A product formulated for placement by vibration in a
form, which can then be stripped for heating the lining so
that it can soon be placed in service, is the following:
% by wei~ht
Calcined bauxite (1/4" by downs)38.8
-325 mesh calcined alumina 7.8
Graphite (1/4" by 30 mesh) 9.7
Graphite (-30 mesh) 9.7
-35 mesh kyanite 7.8
Powdered silicon metal 9.7
Pelleti~ed coal tar pitch 5.8
Chromic oxide 7.8
Lignosulfonate water suspension 2.9
This material can be used at total water levels of 4-1/2 - 6%,
providing a trade-off on ease of vibration vs. tendency to
slump on removal of forms.


EXAMPLE 5
Effective economical formulations are based on useage
of calcined refractory clay aggregates, such as are available
commercially from sources in Missouri and Georgia with alumina
contents ranging from 40-70%. A formulation of a ramming mix
using calcined clay aggregate of 40-47% alumina is as follows:


~.Z94~l

V/o by wei~ht
Calcined clay aggregate (1/4" by downs) 50.5
-325 mesh calcined alumina 6.Q
-30 mesh natural graphite 12.0
Pelletized coal tar pitch 4.5
Plastic ball clay 4.5
Western bentonite 3.0
Silicon metal powder 7.5
Chromium oxide 9.0
Aluminum sulfate 3.0
Water is added to give a moisture in the 6-7% range. This
material can be boxed as a granular product.


EXAMPLE 6
Increased resistance to slag pepetration is achieved by
increasing carbon and chrome oxide contents, as well as in-
creased silicon metal content to protect the carbon, as in the
following formulation:
% by wei~ht
Calcined clay aggregate (1/8" by downs) 20
-30 mesh natural graphite 17
Pelletized coal tar pitch 5
Fine plastic clays 12
Silicon metal powder 23
Chromium oxide 23
Water is added to give a moisture in the 6-7% range for a ram-
ming mix, about 9% for an extrudable refractory plastic.
Higher moisture will provide hand patching or troweling con-
sistencies.
_g_

41


Highly oxidation resistant versions are made using cal-
cined bauxi.tic clay aggregates of 60-70% aluminum oxide, such
as Mulcoa~ 60 and Mulcoa~ 70 sold by C-E Minerals Corporation:
% ~y wei~ht

Calcined clay aggregate (Mulcoa
60 or 70) -4x20 mesh 50
-200 mesh Mulcoa 70 10
-30 mesh natural graphite 11
Fine plas tlC clays 8
Silicon metal powder 8
Chromium oxide 8

Lignosulfonate liquor, 50%
aqueous suspensi.on 5
Water is added to make a granular ramming mix in the 4-5~O
moisture range ~or maximum density and effectiveness.


EXAMPLE. 8
Higher purity systems are ormulated ~tlL tabular
alumina and low ash carbon fines.
/O b~_weigl
-6 mesh tabular alumina 44
Fine plastic clays 9
Silicon metal powder 8
Chromium oxide 28
-30 mesh coke fines 11
Water is add2d to produce a ramming mix or plastic consis-
tency.


- 10-

.,

~;29~

EXAMPLE 9
_
Phosphate bonding is an effective means of obtaining
high strength by preliminary heating to cure prior to use in
service, providing initial impact resistance to molten metal
flow after installation.
% bY weight
-6 mesh tabular alumina 45
-30 mesh natural graphite 6
Western bentonite, -200 mesh 8
Silicon metal powder 8
Chromium oxide 27
75% concentrated phosphoric acid 6
Water is added as in previous example to achieve a ramming
mix or plastic consistency.


In the specification and claims the term "high
alumina" refers to an alumina-containing composition contain-
ing at least 40% by weight alumina, preferably at least 60%

A1203 .

All percentages are in weight percent.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1129441 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-08-10
(22) Filed 1980-01-07
(45) Issued 1982-08-10
Expired 1999-08-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1980-01-07
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CHICAGO FIRE BRICK COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-02-22 1 6
Claims 1994-02-22 3 81
Abstract 1994-02-22 1 14
Cover Page 1994-02-22 1 13
Description 1994-02-22 11 326