Language selection

Search

Patent 1130953 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1130953
(21) Application Number: 353399
(54) English Title: COATING FOR PROTECTING STRUCTURES, MORE PARTICULARLY FROM FIRE AND HEAT
(54) French Title: ENDUIT PROTECTEUR, NOTAMMENT CONTRE LE FEU ET LA CHALEUR, POUR CONSTRUCTIONS
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 6/13
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09D 5/18 (2006.01)
  • C04B 22/16 (2006.01)
  • C04B 28/02 (2006.01)
  • C04B 28/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAUSSAN, JEAN-CHARLES (France)
  • DAUSSAN, GERARD (France)
  • DAUSSAN, ANDRE (France)
(73) Owners :
  • DAUSSAN & COMPAGNIE (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-09-07
(22) Filed Date: 1980-06-05
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
80 05725 France 1980-03-14
79 14285 France 1979-06-05

Abstracts

English Abstract






Abstract of the Disclosure

The invention relates to a coating for protecting structures against
fire and heat, comprising refractory particles coated with a cement and at
least an inorganic compound adapted to provide the coating with a number of
molecules of water of crystallization larger than that normally obtained with
the cement alone, the relative amount of said inorganic compound being comprised
between 1.5 and 20%. The coating is useful for protection against fires.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:


1. A coating for protecting structures against fire and heat, com-
prising refractory particles coated with a cement and at least an inorganic
compound adapted to provide the coating with a number of molecules of water
of crystallisation larger than that normally obtained with the cement alone,
the relative amount of said inorganic compound being comprised between 1.5
and 20%.


2. A coating according to claim 1, characterized in that it also
contains particles of flux in an amount sufficient to ensure superficial cal-
cination of the refractory particles at a temperature substantially between
850 and 900°C.


3. A coating according to claim 1, the cement consisting of an alum-
inous or magnesia cement, characterized in that the said inorganic compound
is selected from the following chemical compounds and mixtures thereof: hy-
drated sodium carbonate, sodium metasilicate, and alkali metal or alkaline-
earth metal phosphate.


4. A coating according to claim 3, characterized in that it has the
following weight composition:

. magnesia cement (magnesia chloride and/or sulphate
with added magnesia): 20 to 80%
. perlite and/or vermiculite and/or fillite: 10 to 0%
. calcium borate 0 to 10%
. synthetic fibres: 60 to 1%
. carbonacous materials (wood flour): 0 to 4%

14


. iron oxide: 0 to 0.2%
. fluorspar: 0 to 4%
. compound contributing water of crystallization
(hydrated sodium carbonate and/or sodium meta-
silicate and/or alkaline or alkaline-earth
phosphate: 10 to 1.8%

5. A coating according to claim 3, characterized in that it has
the following weight composition:
. magnesia chloride and/or sulphate, with
added magnesia: 26 to 60%
. perlite and/or vermiculite in grains of
between 0 and 5 mm in diameter: 15 to 38%
. calcium borate and/or calcium carbonate: 3 to 0%
. synthetic fibres: 28 to 0%
. wood f:Lour: 4 to 0%
. fluorspar: 4 to 0.5%
. sodium metasilicate and/or hydrated sodium
carbonate and/or alkaline or alkaline-earth
phosphate: 20 to 1.5%

6. A coating according to claim 3, characterized in that it has the
following weight composition:
. aluminous cement and/or Portland cement: 30 to 62%
. inorganic particles (e.g. perlite, vermiculite): 25 to 10%
. carbonaceous materials: 0 to 2%
. cement-setting retardants or accelerators: 0 to 2%
. fluxes: 0 to 3.5%
. mineral and/or organic fibres: 40 to 0.5%
. compounds contributing or forming the water
of crystallization: 5 to 20%





7. A coating according to claim 3 or 6, the cement being an ordinary
cement, a monocalcium-aluminate cement, a silicate tri- and bi-calcium cement,
or a refractory cement having a high alumina content, characterized in that
it contains sodium tetraborate and/or boric acid as a cement-setting retardant.


8. A coating according to claim 3, the cement being a magnesia cem-
ent, characterized in that it contains quick and/or slaked lime as a cement-
setting accelerator.


16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~3~953
The present invention relates to a coating for protecting struc-
tures, more particularly against fire and heat.
The word "coating" is used hereinafter in its strlct sense, thus
excluding all solid materials, such as br;ck and perpend-stone having suffi-
cient strength to be used for the fabrication of ma~or construction works.
The word "structures" is used hereinafter mainly to indicate walls,
ceilings, roofing, doors and frames of dwellings or industrial or agricultural
buildings, garages and hangers made with metal beams, joists and pillars,

trusses which are solid, perforated, or in ~he form of lattices, partitions,
panels made of plastic or expanded materials, false ceilings and the suspen-
sion-sections thereof, fire-resistant shields, ventilation shafts, smoke and
flre conduits, pipelines, more particularly pipelines for petroleum products
and the like inflammable materials.
In the following speciication, the word "structures" will also be
used to cover floating structures such QS ships, storage tanks for inflammable
products such as petroleum and chemical products, casings of hydraulic or
atomic turbines, atomic reactors and the like.
~ or the purpose of protecting the foregoing structures from the

effects of fire and heat, general use has already been made of asbestos pro-
ducts, ceramic fibre products, and rock-wool or glass fibre products, possibly
coated with an inorganic or organic binder.
~ mong the binders most commonly used for coating the aforesaid
fibres etc., special mention may be made of the following: ordinary cements
of the "Portland" type, magnesia cements, plaster, aluminum monophosphate and

chlorophosphate, and phosphatic binders.
The density ofthese P~re-resistant products is between 0.3 and 1.2.
Light prodllcts, having a density of between 0.3 and 0.4 usually have a base
of mineral fibres such as rock-wool, basalt wool, or blast furnace-slag wool,


_ 1 - '~'

~L3~

mixed with ordinary"Portland" type cement in a ratio of between 40 and 50%
of cement to between 50 and 70% of fibre. The resistance of these products
to heat is mediocre and they provide relatively little thermal insulation.
They rarely resist fire for more than sixty or ninety minutes, unless they are
compacted or compressed to a density of up to about 0.9, with a protection
thickness greater than or equal to 30 mm.
Fire-resistant products of greater density, i.e. between about 0.9
and 1.2, are generally in the form of a projectable mud having a base of plas-
ter, ordinary cement or magnesia cement, containing refractory particles and
fibres.
These latter products resist fire better and also have a better
thermal-insulation coefficient than the lower-density products mentioned above.
~lowever, none of the above referred to known fire-resistant pro-
ducts withstands a temperature of more than 800-900C. In fack, they lose
their cohesion at these temperatures, since the inorganic binder disintegrates
into a powder. As a result of this, the fire-resistant product becomes de-
tached from the surface to which it was applied, leaving the surface ~mpro-
tected against the effects of fire and heat.
Known products also have the disadvantage of heating up quickly
when exposed to heat, thus rapidly reaching the heat-threshold at which they
are no longer able to perform their protective function.
It is the main purpose of the invention to overcome the foregoing
disadvantages.
According to the present invention there is provided a coating
for protecting structures against fire and heat, comprising refractory particles
coated with a cement and at least an inorganic compound adapted to provide the
coating with a number of molecules of water of crystallisation larger than


--2--
. , .

~ ~3~ 3

that normally obtained with the cement alone, the relative amount of said
inorganic compound being cornprised between 1.5 and 20%.
The coating for protecting structures, more particularly against
fire and heat, comprises refractory particles coated with an inorganic binder
or cement.
According to the present invention, the said coating also contains
at least one inorganic compound imparting thereto, or forming, during the
setting thereof, a number of molecules of water of crystallization higher
than that normally obtained with the binder alonc.
Inorgallis binders, or cements, form, as they set, moLecules of
water of crystallization. Thanks to the presence in the coating of the above-
mentioned inorganic compound, the number of the said molecules of water of
crystalLizat:ion is incroased in the hardened coating.
Experience has shown the surprising result, that the above-mentioned
inorganic compound increases considerably the protection against fire obtained
with the coating.
It has actually been found that a coating of this kind, when exposed
to heat or fire, heats up much less rapidly than known coatings; the larg0r the ;~
number of molecules of water of crystallization contained in the coating, the
lower the average velocity of temperature increase.
Without restricting the present invention to this explanation, it
is believed that this characteristic is due to the fact that the release of the




..
. ~ .

: -

~3~ 5~
water of crystallization requires the application of a considerable amount of
heat, the effect of which is to keep the temperature of the coating to a low
value of between 100 and 200C as long as the water of crystallization has not
been released.
Moreover, the cracking and disintegration of the coating mentioned
above are due precisely to this release of the water of crystallization formed
during the setting of the inorganic binder in the presence of water.
Experts in this field have thus hitherto been discouraged from in-


creasing the amount of water of crystallization in the coating, as proposed
by the present invention, out of fear of accelerating or increasing crackingand disintegration of ~he coating.
Accordlng to the preferred version of the present invention, the
coating also contains a sufficient proportion of flux particles to assure
s~porficial calcination of the reEractory particles at a temperature substan-
~lally be~ween 850 and 900C.
This calclnation causes the refractory particles to weld together,
thus surprisingly maintaining the cohesion of the coating after the inorganic
binder has cracked and disintegrated under the effect of fire and heat. This
calcination of the particles, brought about by the addition of the Elux, thus
2Q takes over the function performed by the inorganic binder until the disinte-
grating temperature is reached.
The above-mentioned temperature range is critical for the following
reasons:
- if the calcination takes place above 900C, the coating becomes
detached from the supporting surface because the binder loses all of its

adhesive power;
- if the calcination takes place below 850C, the cracks which form
in the coating well below that temperature are filled up much too soon by
- 4 -



~L3~;i3
fusion of the inorganic particles under the action of the flux; this preventsevacuation of the final fractions of water of crystallization, allowing gas
pockets to form in the coating, the bursting of which causes the coating to
hecome detached from its supporting surface.
The proportion of 1ux added to the composition is governed mainly
by the following parameters:
- the nature and grain-size of the refractory particles; the higher
the fusion point and size of the said refractory particles, the larger the
amount of flux to be added;
- the nature of the flux; as a general rule the higher the fusion
temperature of the refractory particles ~for example magnesia), the lower the
required fusion temperature af the flux;
- the temperature at which the blnder disintegrates: the lower this
temperature, the higher the amount oE flux to be added, to ensure that the
calcination begins at a temperature substantially equal to that at which the
binder disintegrates.
The coating according to the present invention may also contain up
to about 20% by weight of inflammable carbonaceous material, which may be in
t~e form of paper pulp, vegetable flour, dextrine, or a vegetable oil.
Contrary to what might be expected, carbonization of carbonaceous
material promotes cohesion of the coating exposed to ire and heat.
It has been found in effect, that carbonization of carbonaceous
material causes micro-pores to form within the coating. These micro-pores
prevent the formation of larger cracks detrimental to satisfactory adhesion of
the coating, since they allow the water of crystallization to escape thus
preventing the formation of gas pockets.
~ccording to one advantageous version of the invention, when the
inorganic blnder i~ in the form of an aluminous or magnesia cement, the
- 5 -



i ,

. .

~13~53

above-mentioned inorganic compound is preferably selected from one of the
following compounds or mlxtures thereof: hydrated sodium carbonate, sodium
metasilicate, and alkali metal or alkaline-earth me~al phosphate.
These compounds, when added to conventional cements, ~ormJ during
the setting of the latter a number of molecules of water of crystalllzation
distinctly higher than that formed by the cement alone.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear in the
following description thereof.
When the inorganic binder used is a magnesia cement, the composition
10 by weight of the coating according to the invention is preferably as follows:

magnesia cement ~magnesia chloride or
magnesia sulphate with added magnesia): 20 to 80%
perlite and/or vermiculite and/or fillite: 10 to 0%
calcium borate: O to 10%
synthetic fibres: 60 to 0%
carbonaceous materials (wood flour) O to 4%
iron oxiaes: O to 2.2%
fluorspar: O to 4%

compound introducing water of crystallization
(hydrated sodium carbonate and/or sodium meta-
silicate and/or alkali metal or alkaline-earth
metal phosphate 10 to 1.8%.
A few examples of coating compounds having a magnesia cement base
are given below.




- 6 -
.~
.- ~
' ' ~

~, .
~..

~34~3
Example I
magnesia chloride: 30%
magnesia: 38.5%
perlite: 7%
synthetic fibres: 2%
calcium borate: 10%
wood flour 2%
iron oxide: 0.~%
. sodium metasilicate 10%.
~x. II Ex. IIIEx IV
magnesia sulphate: 31% 31% 34%
magnesia: 33% 33% 37.5%
perlite: 0% 15% 0%
synthetic ibres: 0% 0.5% 0%
calcium borate: 10% 5% 10%
wood flour: 4-5% 4% 4-5%
fluorspar 4% 4% 4%
sodium metasilicate: 10% 7.5% %

hydrated sodium carbonate and/or
alkali metal or alkaline-earth
2n metal phosphate % % 10%
When coatings of this kind are exposed to heat or fireJ they behave
~n the following manner:
The internal temperature of the coating, instcad of increasing in
the form of a continually growing curve, as would be expected, remains con-
stant, for a period generally of several hours, at a temperature between 100
and 200C. This imparts to the coatings according to the invention extremely
advantageous fire and heat-resistant properties.
The said temperature level cannot possibly be attributed to thermal


: - 7 -

~'.




;

insulation provided by the compon0nts o the coating; it is believed that
it is due to the presence, with~n the coating, of an appreciable quantity of
water of crystallization.
The release of this water of crystallization in fact requires the
application of an amount of heat correspondina to the binding energy of water
molecules and 540 kcal~kg to transform this free water into steam. Further-
more, water released in the form of steam adds moisture ~o the atmosphere
which aids in extinguishing the fire.
The temperature level at which this release of water occurs persists
until all of the water of crystallization has been evaporated. Thus the time
during which the temperature TemainS at this level is proportional to the
amount of water of crystallization in the coating.
Cracking of the coa~ing, due to disintegration of the inorganic
binder~ begins before all of the water of crystallization has been released.
At thls stage, the inorganic binder, which has now lost all oE the physical
properties of a binder, is no longer capable of providing cohesion of the coat-
ing. This is when calcination of the refractory particles occurs and assures
a certain amount of cohesion, preventing the coating from becoming a dust.
Thanks to the fluxes (calcium borate and fluorspar)J the calcination
b~gins at a temperature substantially between 850 and 900C, as a result the
coating according to the invention provides protection against heat and fire
up to temperature generally ln excess of 1200C.
The coating obtained with the composition according to Example I is
~ery hard and adheres very well to all supports, including glass. It should
not, howsverJ be exposed to weathering. When exposed to fire, the temperature
of these coatings remains constant at about 100C for between thirty minutes
and six hours ~depending on their thickness), due to the water of crystalliza-
tion they contain. Moreover, calcination of the inorganic particles ~perlite


- 8 -

~.`

~3~5~
or vermiculite), brought about by the fluxes ~calcium bora~e and fluorspar),
allo~s the coating to remain cohesive up to temperatures well above 1000C.
Coatings in accordance with Examples II, III and IV are preferably
used for finishing layers applied to existing coatings, such as mineral or
asbestos sheets, for the purpose of improving mechanical properties.
It is also possible to obtain, with a magnesia cement, a coating
having good acoustical-insulating properties, with substantical resistance to
fire, by modifying the composition as follows:

magnesia chloride or magnesia sulphate
with added magnesia: 26 to 60%

. perlite and/or vermiculite in grains
of between 0 and 5 mm in diameter: 15 to 38%
. calcium borate and/or calcium carbonate3 to 0%
synthetic fibres: 28 to 0%
wood flour: 4 to 0%
fluorspar: 4 to 0.5%

sodium metasilicate and/or hydrated sodium
carbonate and/or alkali metal or alkalin-earth
metal phosphate: 20 to 1.5%
When the inorganic binder used is an aluminous cement of the Port-
land type ~ordinary cement or NF 45 R white cement), the composition by
weight of the coating according to the addition is as follows:
aluminous and/or Portland cement: 30 to 62%

inorganic particles ~for example
perlite and/or vermiculite: 25 to 10%
carbonaceous materials: 0 to 2%
~ . cement-setting retardants or accelerators0 to 2%
.:
- . fluxes: 0 to 3.5%

. mineral and/or organic fibres: 40 to 0.5%


~ . compounds contributing or ~orming
.- the water of crystallization: 5 to 20%.

~: _ g _
,.

,; .
.
.
: :

1~30953
A few exa~ples of coating compounds having an aluminous or Portland
I cement ~ase are given ~elow: ~.
Example V
. Portland cement: 29%
: . aluminous cement: 16% ~ :
fluorspar: 5%
. silica: 20% :
hydrated alumina: 20%
sodium metasilicate or alkali metal ::
or alkaline-earth metal phosphate: 10%
: 10 Ex. VIEx. VII
aluminous cement: 62% 50%
perlite: 10% 15%
vermiculite: 0% 10%
synthetic fibres: 0.5% 0.5%
~ood flour: 4% ~%
. fluorspar: 3.5% 2.5%
-~ . hydrated sodium`carbonate and/or
alkali metal or alkaline-earth 17 5o~
metal phosphate: 20% . O
- Ex. VIII Ex IX
. aluminous cement: 20% 17%
~ Portland cemen~: 37% 29%
quick lime: 18% 14%
perlite: 20% 18%
2% 2%
:: . fluorspar:
- . ~ood flour: 3% 3%
hydrated sodium carbonate and/or
: alkali metal or alkaline-earth 18%
metal phosphate:
,
'''`'' - 10-
:-~
~'~
:;
i ~:

., ~ .

~3~5~

Ex. X Ex. XI Ex. XII
aluminous cement: 17.5% 0% 57.45%
Portland cement: 32% 58% 0%
quick or slaked lim0: 26.5% 0% 0%
perlite: 16% 5% 10%
vermiculite: 0% 10% 0%
synthetic -fibres: 0.5% 0.5% 0% ;-
1uorspar: 3.5% 3.5% 3-5%
cement-setting retardants or
accelerators: 0% 1% 0.045%
. wood flour: 4% 2% 4%
hydrated calcium carbonate and/or
alkali metal or alkaline-earth
metal phosphate: 0% 20% 0%
calcium carbonate: 0% 0% 25~
Coatings obtained with compositions according to Examples V to XII
are not as hard as those obtained with compositions according to Examples 1 to
IV. They adhere well to plaster, cement and iron. Ater exposure to ire,
they do not adhere quite as well as coatings with a magnesia-cement base, but
the~ have better flre-resistance, due to the excellent calcination between the
inorganic particles.
- 20 In this respect, the coating according to Example XII has the best
performance.
Coatings according to Examples V to XIT may be exposed to weathering.
' Coatings according to Examples V to IX are best for delaying the in-
crease in temperature during a fire since, during setting, they retain a
maximal quantity of water of crystallization.
In the case o ordlnary Portland-type cements, slag cements, fused
monocalcium-aluminate cements, artificial silicate tri- and boro-calcium
~ ' - 11 - '

'~', , '



.~' ' ' '~
~ '

~3~

cements, and refractory cements having a high alumina content, the addition
of the compound which provides the water of crystallizationJ especially in the
case of alkali metal carbonate,accelerates appreciably the setting of these
cements, which is a disadvantage when the coatings are b0ing appLied.
The Applicant has found that this disadvantage may be overcome b~
adding to the coating composition a setting-retardant consisting of borax
~sodium tetraborate) or boric acid.
In this connection, Exampl0 XIII is as follows:
. cement as specified above: 57%

. a powder charge ~perlite, vermiculite,
expanded glass spheres and mixtures
thereof): 15%
fluxes (colemanite and/or fluorspar): 5%

hydrated sodium carbonate ~water o
crystallization): 20%
borax and/or boric acid: 3%.
When a coating of this kind 25 mm in thickness is exposed to a tem-
peratur~ of 1050C ~as measured on one of its surfaces), after 60 minutes the
temperature on the other surface scarcely reaches 110C.
The composition starts to set only 10 minutes after the constituants
have been mixed.
In the case of magnesia cementsJ the setting time depends upon the
fire-loss of the magnesia used therein. The setting time is optimal when the
magnesia fire-loss is about 12-13%. Otherwise the setting is often too slow.
The Applicant has found that this disadvantage may be overcome by
adding, to the composition of a magnesia cement containing any kind of magne-

- sia, quick and/or slaked lime as a setting accelerator.
This is rapresented in Example XIV below:




- 12 -


.-:

~.~.3~S3

magnesia cement Cmagnesia chloride and/or
sulphate with added magnesia~: 72%
perlite and~or vermiculite and/o~ expanded
glass spheres and/or expanded polystyrene: 15%
carbonaceous materials (wood flour or
the like): 3%
fluxes ~fluorspar and/or eolemanite): 5%
quick and/or slaked lime: 5%.
A composition of this kind begins to set after about 15 minutes.




- 13 -
' , , .

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1130953 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-09-07
(22) Filed 1980-06-05
(45) Issued 1982-09-07
Expired 1999-09-07

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1980-06-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DAUSSAN & COMPAGNIE
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-02-22 13 472
Drawings 1994-02-22 1 14
Claims 1994-02-22 3 81
Abstract 1994-02-22 1 17
Cover Page 1994-02-22 1 20