Language selection

Search

Patent 1131839 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1131839
(21) Application Number: 303339
(54) English Title: MIXTURES OF RUBBER WITH GRAFT COPOLYMERS
(54) French Title: MELANGES DE CAOUTCHOUC ET DE COPOLYMERES GREFFES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 400/1112
  • 400/1114
  • 400/1115
  • 400/1300
  • 400/3048
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08L 7/00 (2006.01)
  • C08F 291/02 (2006.01)
  • C08L 9/00 (2006.01)
  • C08L 21/00 (2006.01)
  • C08L 51/00 (2006.01)
  • C08L 55/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MULLER, EBERHARD (Germany)
  • OTT, KARL-HEINZ (Germany)
  • GOBEL, WILHELM (Germany)
  • PAMPUS, GOTTFRIED (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-09-14
(22) Filed Date: 1978-05-15
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 27 22 403.9 Germany 1977-05-17

Abstracts

English Abstract




Abstract of the Disclosure

Rubber mixture are disclosed wherein a graft copolymer
(B) is mixed with a rubber (A) in an amount from
1 to 80% by weight, and wherein the graft monomers of
(B) are identical of compatible with the monomers of the
rubber (A) used for mixing.





Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A vulcanized rubber mixture comprising a rubber (A) in an amount of from 99 to
20% by weight and a graft copolymer (B) in an amount of from 1 to 80% by
weight, said graft copolymer (B) having a particle size of from 0.1 to 2 µm
and having been produced by polymerization of grafting base and grafting
monomer in the presence of a radical initiator; said rubber (A) being
selected from natural rubber, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polychloroprene,
butadiene-styrene copolymer, isoprene-styrene copolymer, butadiene-acryloni-
trile copolymer, butadiene-isobutylene copolymer, isoprene-isobutylene
copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer, polyisobutylene, ethylene-vinyl-
acetate copolymer and acrylate rubbers; the graft base of said graft copolymer
(B) being at least one member selected from polybutadiene, polyisoprene,
polychloroprene, natural rubber, styrene-butadiene copolymer, acrylonitrile-
butadiene copolymer, styrene-isoprene copolymer, polystyrene, styrene-
acrylonitrile copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer, ethylene-propylene
diene terpolymer, polyisobutylene, isobutylene-isoprene copolymer, poly-
methylacrylate, polyethylacrylate, polyyropylacrylate, polybutylacrylate,
polymethyl methacrylate, ethylene-vinylacetate copolymer, polycarbonate,
yolyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinylchloride and cellulose esters; and the
grafting monomer of the graft copolymer (B) being identical to or compatible
with the monomer of rubber (A) and being at least one monomer selected from
butadiene, isoprene, chloroprene, isobutylene, butadiene/styrene, butadiene/
acrylonitrile, isoprene/styrene, isoprene/isobutylene, methylacrylate, ethyl-
acrylate, propylacrylate, butylacrylate, isoprene/butadiene, chloroprene/
isoprene and isoprene/acrylonitrile.

2. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, comprising 95 to 70% by
weight of rubber (A) and 5 to 30% by weight of graft copolymer (B).


3. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft monomer of


22

graft copolymer (B) is present in an amount of 10 to 80% by weight based on
the graft base.

4. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 3, wherein the graft monomer of
graft copolymer (B) is present in an amount of 30 to 60% by weight based on
the graft base.

5. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1 wherein the
rubber (A) is selected from natural rubber, polybutadiene, polyisoprene,
butadiene-styrene copolymer, butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer, isoprene-
isobutylene copolymer, ethylene-propylene copolymer and polychloroprene.

6. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the rubber (A) is
a butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer.

7. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft copolymer
(B) is produced from latex bases having a particle size of from 0.1 to 1.0 µ.
8. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the proportion of
graft copolymer is from 1 to 30%.

9. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft base is
crosslinked.
10. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the polymer chains
of the graft monomer have a molecular weight of from 2000 to 150,000.

11. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 10, wherein the polymer chains
of the graft monomer have a molecular weight of from 5,000 to 150,000.

12. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft copolymer
(B) is uncrosslinked.

13. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft copolymer
(B) is produced by grafting in benzene, toluene, xylene or mixtures thereof




23

by means of radical initiators.


14. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft
copolymer (B) is produced in one or more aliphatic solvents by
means of radical initiators.


15. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 14, wherein the
aliphatic solvent is hexane, pentane, cyclohexane, or mixtures
thereof.


16. A rubber mixture as claimed in claim 1, wherein the graft
copolymer (B) is produced in mixtures of aliphatic and aromatic
solvents by means of radical initiators.




24

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


33~3


The present invention rel~te6 to rubber mixtures ~nd more
particularly relates to rubber mixt.ures wh~rein a gra~t
polymer ~B) is added to a ~Ibber (A) :in qu~ntities of from
1 to 80~ by weight, the monomers Or (B) which ~re used ~or
grafting being identical or comp~tible with the ~ono~ers
of the rubber (A) used for mixing.
~ ixtures of rubber ~ith other rubbers vr the~mopl~sts
are known in many conceivable v~ri~-tions ~nd are described
in the relevant literature. See ~or ex~ple Rubber Chem.
Techn. 47 ~3) 481-50, 1974 and Rubber Chem. Techn, 49 (1),
93-104 (1976).
Such mixtures ~re gener~lly used to achie~e a balanced
r~tio between proc~ssing prop~rties, service properties and
costs. As far as the service propertie~ are concerned,
this means ior ex~mple that, in ~any cases, a specifio t~pe
of rubber is regarded as unsuitable for a cert~in ~pplioation,
whereas another property of the s~e ~Ibber is highly desirable.
Thus 9 cert~in rubbers are blended with one ~nother in order
to additionally obt~in desirable properties ~nd to reduee
undesir~ble properties.
Because of the well known serious incompAtibility o~
polymers wîth one ~nother, there are numerous limitations
in the production o~ polymer mixtures, see ~or ex~mple,.
Kolloid-Zeitschrift u. Zeitschrift ~. Polymere, VQ1~ 213,
1966, Lothar Bohn and J~ MQcro;nol. Sci.-Rev~. Macromol. Che~. 9
C7 (2), ~51-~14 ~1972).
As a result o~ incompatibilities, deteriorations gener~lly
occur in the technologic~l properties o~ rubber-ru~ber mi~tures



Le A 18 040 - 2

3''.~

(~or ex~mple reduct10n o~ the tensile ~trength of mixtures
of polybut~diene with polych10roprene or nitrile rubber)
or rubber-thermopl~st mi~ture~ ~for ex~DIple reduction in
the elong~tion at break o~ mixtures of polyethylene and
n~tur~l rubber or polystyrene ~nd polybut~diene). Considerable
reduction~ in tensi1e stren~th and te~r propagatlon resist~nce
are also observed ~or example in~t~ ease of mixtures of
thermopl~stic styrene~butadiene three~block po1ymers with
po1ybut~diene or polyethylene.
Gener~lly, it ~ay be s~id th~t, in the case of co~p~tîble
polymers~ the properties o~ the ~ixtures v~ry substanti~lly
line~rly with their composition. Th1s ~pplies only, howeYer,
to compatible mixtures~ Incomp~tible poIy~ers c~n on1y be
mixea ~ith one another when important properties o~ the polymer
to be mofli~ied ~re not too seriously a~ectea.
It has now been found that rubber ~A~; prefer~bly ~ diens
or olefin rubber or their copolymers, can be mixed with oth0r
polymers when certain gr~t polymers (B) are used ~or mixi~g
in qu~ntities of from 1 to 80~ by weight, $he base of the
graft polymer (B) being grafte~ with monomers which ~re
identical or compatible with the ~ono~er~ of the rubber (A)
and ~hich conveniently ~y be crosslinked together with th~
rubber (A) in the ~ixture. It is also possible to use
di~ferent mo~omers for gra~ting. In t~is way, ther~ is obt~ined
a new type o~ ~Ibber in which a regular~ locally fixed
distribution o~ graft po:ly~er particles i5 present.
~lc~ ed ~bber
~ Aceordingly, the present invention pro~i~es a~ ixture
: of rubbers (A3 and gra~t polymers (B) in quantities of ~rom


Le A 18 040 - 3 ~
'~ '

~`

339

~9 to 20 parts by weight (A) and :I to 80 parts by welght {B), said grat
copolymer (~) having a parti.cle s:ize o:E from 0.1 to 2 ~m and having been
p:roduced by polymeri~atioll of grafting base and grafting monomer in the
presence of a radical ;.nit:i.ator; sai.d rubber (A) being selected from natural
rubber, polybutadi.ene, polyisoprene, polychloroprene, butadiene-styrene
copolymer, isoprene-styrene copolymer, butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer,
butadiene-isobutylene copolymer, isoprene-isobutylene copolymer, ethylene-
propylene copolymer, polyisobutylene, ethylene-vinylacetate copolymer and
acrylate rubbers; the graft base of said graft copolymer (B) being at least
one member selected from polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polychloroprene, natural
rubber, styrene-butadiene copolymer, acrylonitri.le-butadiene copolymer,
styrene-isoprene copolymer, polystyrene, s~yrene-acrylonitrile copolymer,
ethylene-propylene copolymer, ethylene-propylene di.ene terpolymer, polyiso-
butylene, isobutylene-isoprene copolymer, polymethylacrylate, polyethylacrylate
polypropylacrylate, polybutylacrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, ethylene-vinyl-
acetate copolymer, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyvinyl-
chloride and cellulose esters; and the grafting monomer of the graft copolymer
~B) being identical to or compatible with the monomer of rubber (A) and being
at least one monomer selected from butadiene, isoprene, chloroprene, isobutyl-

ene, butadiene/styrene, butadiene/acrylonitrile, isoprene/styrene, isoprene/isobutylene, methylacrylate, ethylacrylate, propylacrylate, butylacrylate,
isoprene/butadiene~ chloroprene/isoprene and isoprene/acrylonitrile. The
i.nvention also provides a process for producing said mixture.
In contrast to all hitherto known rubber mixtures, it is possible
with a rubber mixture of the present invention to establish a morphology of a
multiphase rubber system which is largely independent of the mixing conditions
~mixing rolls~ internal mixer, solution).
Preferred rubbers (A) are selected from polybutadienes, polyisoprenes,
butadi.ene-styrene copolymers butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymers, isoprene-

isobutylene copolymers, ethylene-propylene copolymers and polychloroprenes.



l~

il3~

~I;xtures of the above graEt polymers ~B) may also be used as the gra:Et base.
lhree or more of the ~raEt mollomers :Eor producing the graft
copolymer (B) may be grafted into the mixture to obtain better compatibility.
For the purposes of illustration, the following mixtures are
mentioned by way of e~ample:
For mi.xing with polychloroprene as rwbber ~A), the following polymers
may be gra~ted with chloroprene: po~ychloroprene, polybutadiene, styrene-

butadiene copolymers, acrylonitrile-butadiene copolymers, styrene-i.soprene .
copolymers, polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile copolymers, and ethylene~
propylene copolymers; the following polymers are preferably grafted with
butadi.ene and/or isoprene for mixing with polybutadiene, as rubber (A):
polystyrene, acrylonitrilebutadiene copolymers, polychloroprene, styrene-
acrylonitrile copolymers, and ethylene-propylene copolymers; the following
polymers are preferably grafted with isoprene or butadiene and acrylonitrile
for mixing with butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymers as rubber ~A): polybutadiene,
polyisoprene or polystyrene or their

'




~.

~l~3~3~3

copolymeTs, ~nd ethylene-propylene copolymers; -the following
polymers ~re preferably grafted with isobu-tylene ~or mixing
with polyisobutylene as rubber (A)~ pQlysl;yrene9 styrene-
~crylonitrile copolymers, and polychloroprene. the following
poly~ers are preferably grafted with isoprene and/or
butadiene and/or lsobutylene or chloroprene with i~oprene
~nd/or butadiene and/or butadiene and/or isobutylene for
mixing with ethylene-propylene copolymers as rubber (A)-
polystyrene,~polybutadiene, polyethylene, polycarbo~ate
~nd butadiene-~crylonitrile copolymers, and also styrene-
acrylonitrile copolymers~
Different rubbers (A) may also be made miscible with
one another by ~ixing in one or more graft copolymers.
Naturally the~examples given above only show some o~ the
nu'merous possibilities of producing co~patible ~ixtures.
The graft copolymers ~) which may consist of one or
~ore di~ferent graft copolymers ~re added to the rubber (A)
in quantities of from 1 to 80~ by weigh-t and pPe~erably
in quantities of ~ro~ ~ to 30% by weight. The graft monomer
of the gra~t polymer (B~ may be used i~ a quantity o~ ~rom
10 to 80~ by weight, preferably in a quantity o~ from
30 to 60~ by weight, based on the graft base.
The molecular weight of the chain o~ the graft br~ches
may be o~ the order o~ ~rom 5000 to 1,000,000 and preferably -
from 20,000 to 150,000 (~s measured by the light scattering
method).
~he graft monomer may be crosslinked, but a low degree
of crosslinki~g is preferred. The graft base may be crosslinked

ke A 18 040 ~ 6 ~

33~3

or uncrossL:inked, althou~ll i-t is pre.eerably crosslink~d.
The graI't polymer (B~ has a pArtic:l~ size of Irom
0.1 to 2~m, preferably ~rom Ool -to 0.8 ~m.
The gra~t po.lymcrs (B) may be prc,duced by radical
solut~on, or by bulk, suspension or emulsion polymerisation5
irrespectiv~ of the~ tor used~ at t,empe~a-tures of from
~2VC to 120C. It is preferred to adopt a process in which .
the graft polymer is obtalne~ in a form in which it can be
favourably mixed with the r~bber (A). For e:~ample, in cases
where a rubb~r (A) produced by solution polymerisation, such
as for c~alDple cis-194~olybutadiene or an ethylene-propylene
copolymer, is, to be mixed with a graft polymer (B), the
graft polymer (B) used will be a graft polymer which has been
produced in ~1 solution which is identical or miscible with
the solvent used in the production o~ the rubber (A)~
If for example a rub~er ~A) produced by emulsion
polymerisation, such as an emulsion st~rene butadiene copolymer
or polychloroprene or a butadiene acrylonitrile copolymer,
is to be mixed with a graft polymer (B) 9 it is preferable
to use an emulsion process ~or producing the graft polymer (B)~
Bases having an aver~ge particle size of from 0.05 to 1 ~,
pre~erably from 0.1 to 0.4 ~, ~re used for the production
of graft latices.
If it is desired to produce gra~t polymers ~) haYing
~ base which normally contains no doublc bonds, hydrogen
atoms or heterogenous groups which are suitable ~or gra~ting,
bases are synthesised by copolymerisation with certain

Le A 1~ 0ll0 - 7


eomc)rlomcl~ sllitR`ble for gl~nIt polymerisation (for exarnplo
styl~ene is copolymeri~c(l ~ith isoprene or butadiene in
quantities O:e from 5 to 2~
A number o-L` desir~ble technological ~roperties can be
o`btainecl by suitable mixtures of rubber (A) and gr~Et
polymer (B). For example, the strength9 moduli and processi-
bili~y of polychloroprene rubbers can be improved accordingly
by ch~oroprene-gra~ted polystyrene or styrene/acrylonitrile
copolymer. By mixing chloroprene-grafted polybutadiene with
polychloropre~e, its low-temper~ture flexibility is increased.
By mixing chloropr~ne-gra~ted butadie~e/acrylonitrile copolymer
with polychloroprene, its resistance to oil is ~lproved~
By mixing butadLene- or isoprene-grafted polys~yrene with
polybutadiene or ethylene-propylene rubbers, their strength
and processibility are improved. By mixing isoprene- or
butadiene/acrylonitrile~grafted butadiene or i~oprene,
the low-temperature flexibility o~ butadiene/acrylonitrile
copolymers is increased. o
These examples may be continued ad in~initun and the
aboYe are by way o~ illustration only The important ~actor
in every case is that~ by virtue of the grafting-induced
compa~ibility of the graft copolymers with the rubbers, it
ia possible to obtain a controlled modi~ication of certain
technological properties without the characteristic properties
~5 of the base rubber (A) being undesirably in:Eluenced to any
significant extent.
The rubber (A) may be mi~ed with the gra~t polymer (B)

~e ~ lB 040 - 8 -

~3~

in diIferent ways:
For ex~mple, it is possible to mix the corresponding
latices at room temper~tllre or at el~vated temperature ~nd
then to congulate the resulti~g mixtures by adding salts~
acids or alcohols, or to precipita-te the rubber mi~ture
by low-temperature coagulatio~. It i~ also possible to mix
the dissol~ved pol~mers (A) and (B) ~nd to work up the
solution by stripping, spray d~ying or precipitation~ for
example with alcohol. For the sake of comp1eteness, re~e.rence
is ~lso made to the possibility of mixing latex with solution.
Mixing may also be carried out mechanic~lly o~ mixing rolls,
in internnl mixers or in screw extruders at temperatures
in the range ~rom 20 to 120C.
Fillers, extenders and vulcanisation aids may also be
incorporated duri~g the mixing oper~tio~s.
The mixtures of rubber ~A) and graft polymer (B) may be
vulcanised ln the usual way in the presence of sulphur or
peroxides.
The process accordlng to the invention is illustrated
by the following Examples:
A~ Production o~ gra~t polymers
B. Production o~ graft polrmer/rubber mixtures~
Ad A: The graft polymers used ~or ml~i~g with rubber are
produced i~ emulsion, suspension or solution by means
o-f radical initiators,
EX~MPLE A 1
1600 g of polybutadi~ne latex ~solids content 540 4~,
average particle size 0.4 ~) and 1640 ~1 o~ desalted water

Le A 18 040 ~ 9 -

are introduced in-to ~ (i litre fl.ask. The ~lask ls then
purged with nitrogen an~ lts contents heated to 63-65C.
After heating, a solutlon o:f 4.5 g of potassium persulph~ke
ln 200 ml of water ls added.
At 63 to 65C~ 540 g of chloroprene and a mixture of
375 g of water and 12 g of an emulsifier of the alkyl
sulphonate type are separately and sl~ultaneously added
dropwise over a period oI 4 hours, followed by stirring
for 4 to 6 hours at 63-65C.
After degassing, the latex is filtered and directly
u~ed for mixing test~ with rubber lat~ces or solutions,
EX~PLE A 2
1600 g o butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer latex
~ o~ acrylonitrîle, DeYo hardne~s 1000, solids co~centration
49 5~ particle size 0.2 ~) and 1640 ml of desalted water
are introduced into a 6 litre flask.
The flask is then purged wi-th nitrogen and its contents
heated to 63 - 65C. A~ter heati~g9 ~ solution o~ 4.5 g o~ !:
potassium persulphate in 200 ml of desalted water is added.
At 63 to 650~, 540 g of chloroprene and a ~ixture o~
375 g of water and 12 g of an emulsi~ier o~ the alkyl sulphonate
type.are simultaneously and separately added dropwise over
a period of 4 hours, followed by stirri~g for 4 to 6 hours
at 63 to 65C. A~ter degas~ing, the ~atex is filtered.
EX~MPLE A 7
2260 g of polychloroprene latex (solids conc~n-tration
35.2 %, av~rage particle size 0~ /u) and 1000 ml
of desalted water are introduced into a 6 litre flask,
~he fla.~k is t~en purged with nit~o~en and its con~ents
heated to 63 - 65C. After heating7 a solution of 405 g o~
Le A 18 040 - 10 -
__ .

~13~31~


potassium persulphate in 200 ml of water i~ added.
At 63 to 65C, 540 g of chloroprene and a mixture of
375 g of water and 12 g of an emulsifier of the alkyl sulphonate
type are simultaneously and sep~rately added dropwise over
a period of ~ hoursy ~ollowed b~ stirring for 4 to 6 hours,
at 63 to 65C. After degas~ing, the latex i5 ~iltered.
EXAMPIIE A 1~
___
1600 g of polybutadiene latex (solids content 54.4%,
average particle size 0.4 ~) and 1640 ml of desalted w~ter
are introduc~d into a 6 litre flask.
The flask is then purged with nitro~en and its contents
heated to 63 - 650C. After hea-ti~g~ a solution of 4,5 g of
potassium persulphate in 200 ml of water is added.
At 63 - 65C, a mixture of 378 g of isoprene and 162 g
f acrylonitrile together with 375 ml of water and 12 g of
an emulsifier of the alkyl sulphon~te type ~re simultaneously
and separately added drop~ise over ~ period of 4 hours,
fol'Lowed ~y stirring for 4 to 6 hours at 63 - 65C. After
degassing, the latex is filtered.
EXAMPLE A 5
1600 g of a butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer latex
(33% of acrylonitrile, Defo hardnese 1000, so:Lids concentration
49.3%, average partic:le size 0,19 ~) and 1640 ml of des~lted
water are introduced into a 6 litre flask.
The flask is then purged with nitrogen and its contents
heated to 63 ~ 65Co At 63- 65C, ~ mixture of 475 g of
styrene and 65 g of acrylonitrile together with 375 ml of


Le A 18 040 1'1 ~-

.3~


wa-ter ~nd 12 g of an emulsi~ier of the alkyl sulphonats
type nre simult~neously and separately added dropwise over
a period of 4 hours, follQwed by stirring ~or 4 to 6 hours
at 63 - 65C. After degassing~ the latex is filtere~
r EX~SPl.E A ~i
___
1970 g o-f ~tyrene-~soprene copolymer latex (10~ o~
isoprene, solids content 40 8~, ~ver~ge particles size 0.15
and 1260 g of des~lted wa-ter are initially intru~ced
into a 6 litre flas~.
The flask is then purged with ni~rogen and its contents
heated to 63 - 65C. A-t 63 - 65C9 540 g o~ chloroprene ~nd
a mixture of 375 g of water and 12 g o~ an emulsifier of the
alkyl su:Lphonate type are simultaneously and separately
added dropwise over ~ period o~ 4 hours) followed by s~irring
for 4 to 6 hours at 63 - 65~o A~ter degassing, the latex
is filtered.
' :
250 g o~ cis-1,4-polybutadiene ~ ~ 240 ml~g~ is
added to 4 litres o~ toluene, followed by stirrlng until a
solution is formed. 200 g of chlorophene, 200 g o~ isoprene
and 12 g o~ benzoyl peroxide are then added, followed by
stirrlng ~or 18 hours at 60C
EXAMPLE A 8
5.2 litres o~ n-hexane and 320 g of ethylene-propylene
:2S terpolymer (EN-type~ Mooney ML 4-100 90, 12 C=C-d~uble bonds
per 1000 carbon atoms) are introduced into a 10 litre autocla~e,
followed by stirring until the rubber has completely dissolved.


Le A 18 040 - 12 ~
__

~L~3~L~33~

~l80 g o~ chloroprenc and a so`lution of 15.'~ g o~ dibenzoyl
pero~ide in 100 ml o~ benzene are then added, followed b~r
stirring for 18 hourc at 60C~
Ad B: The rubber ~nd gra~t polymer are mi~ed with each other
in latex form, in solution or in solid form on mixing
rolls or in all internal mixer. The latex mixtures ~nd
the solutlon are worked up in kno~ manner ~y
precipitation and stripping, respectively.
St~ndard c~rbon black mi~tures are initially produced
-from the graft polymer mixtures in accordance with
IS0 Speci~ic~tioll 2475-1975 ~E), ~ter which ~ouldings
are produced ~rom the resulting mixtures and then
pressvulcanised for 20, 40 and 60 minutes at a
temperature of 150C. The necessary test specimens ~re
cut ~rom the sheets obtained. Strength (F~l elong~tion
(D) and strain values (S; at 100/300~ elongation)
are tested on the Standard ~est Ring I according to
DIN 53 504, whilst Shore hardness A ~H; a-t 20 and 70C~
is -tested in accordance with DIN 53~05 and resilience
2V (E) in accordance with DIN 53512. The compression set
is measured in accordance with DIN 53517~ The crude
graft polymer m-ixtures employed are used for measuring
the polymer viscosity and the difference in viscosity
between the one minute and the ~our minute value in
a Mooney Tester at 100C (Ml-4) i~ accord~nce with
DIN 53523 and De~o plasticity in accordance with former
DIN 53514. The gel content is determined by centri~uging

Le A 18 040 ~ 13

~3~3~

a toluenc ~olutiorl,
A selection of prepared and tested graft poly~er
mixl;ures (I~.~X) is given and fully characterised
in 'l'ables la ~nd lb. The test dat~ of the vulcanisates
nre shown ln Table II.
F~MPLE B 1 (Table 1~)
Polymer mixtures of 90 (I) and 80 (II) parts by weight
o~ a chloroprene homopolymer with 10 and 20 parts by weight,
respectiv~ly, of a chloroprene-grafted polystyrene have
a distinctly higher gel content and viscos:ity trencl value,
re~lected in better prccessing properties, in comparison
with the pure chloroprene ho~opolymer (V).
The products also show high streng-th, strength and
hardness ~alues in the vulc~nis~tes.
~ (Table la)
Pol~mer mixtures of 90 (III) and 80 (IY) parts by weight
of a chloroprene homopolymer with 10 and 20 parts by weight,
respectively, of ~ chloroprene-grafted butadiene-~crylonitrile
copolymer containing 38~ of acrylonitrile ~l~o show a
higher gel content and viscosity trend value ~nd, hence,
better processing properties ~y comp~rison with the pure
chloroprene homopolymer (V). In the ext~usio~ of strln~sg
output is higher axld the level o~ extrusion swelling lower.
A~ter agein~ in hot air (21 days/100C)~ the i~crease
in the hardness and strain values ~ the vulcanisates containing
the polymers according to the inve~tion is lower, i.e. they
are more resistant to ageing. In addition, the ~ulcaxlisates

~e A 18 040 - 14 -

~3~33~

cont~ining the polymers accordlng to the l~vention ars muoh
more resistant -to ASTM oils~ ~s shown by storage test~ at
1.00C.
EXAMPLE ~ 3 (Tnble la)
Pol~r mixtures of 85 (~ nd 70 (VII) pnrts by weight
o~ a chloroprene homopolymer wi th 15 arld 30 parts by we:ight
respectively~ of a chloroprene-grafted polybutadiene also
show a much higher gel content and viscosity trend value and,
hence, extre~ely good processing properties in comparison

with the pure ho~opolymer (V)~
The vulc~nisates of the polymer mi~tures show hlgher
hardness, strain and elastic~-ty values in compariso~ with the
re-ference material.

EXAMPLE B ~ (Table la)
. Polymer mixtures of 90 (VII13 and 80 (IX) parts by
weight of a chloroprene homopoly~er with lO and 20 parts by
weight, respectively, o~ ~ ehloroprene-gr~ed styrene~isoprene
copolymer show higher gel contents and viscosi*y trend values
and, hence, better processing properties in co~parison wit~

the pure chloroprene homopolymer (Y).
EXAMPLE B 5 (Table la)
In comparlson with the ungrafted re~erence material (V)g
a polymer ~ixture o~ 80 parts by weight of a chloroprene
homopolymer with 20 parts by weight o~ a chloropre~e-gra~ted
polychloroprene (X) also 3hQws higher gel contents and viscosity
trend values ~nd9 hence9 better proce3sing properties. Higher
strain, hardnes~ ~nd elasticity v~Lues are ob-tained in the




Le A 18 040 lc~ _

~ L3

vulc~ni sate .
EXAMPLE ~ 6 ~Table la)
In compArison with the ungrafted re~erence material (XIII),
polymer mixtures of 90 (XI) and 80 (XII) parts by weight
of a sulphur-modified polychloroprene with l0 and 20 parts
by weight, respectively, of ~ chloroprene-grafte~ polybutadiene
si~ilarly to the product6 of the preceding Examples - show
higher gel contents and ~iscosity trend values which enable
rolled sheets to be rapidly ~ormed. In the carbon bl~ck mixtures,
the products are less lnclined to become tacky on the rolls
and pro~ote more rapid vulcanisation which leads to a higher
crosslinking density with higher strain, hardness, el~sticity
and compression set values.
~ tTable la)
The polymer mixture of 80 parts by weight of a chl~ropr~ne
homopolymer with 20 parts by weight of a chloroprene-grafted
butadiene-acrylonitrile copolymer containing 38~ of acrylonitrile
(IV b) shows ~ Mooney vi8c06ity ML-4~100C o~ 58 ME and a
gel content of 16%.
In this respect, it is comparable with a so-called pre-
crosslinked polychloroprene (IV a) which is obtained by mixing
benzene-soluble homopolymers or copolymers of chloroprene
with ben~ene-insoluble copolymers of chloroprene generally
produced by known methods, e.g. British Patent No. 1,158,970,
using diesterst and which is used in particular for applications
requiring good processing properties. Howe~er, ~or e~uivalent
processing properties of IV b and IV a, the polymer mixture
according to the invention produces higher strength valuesf

Le A 18 040 - 16
___

33~

better co~pression set and be-tter agei~g b0haviour.
EXAMPLE L 8 lTable lb)
A pol~er mixtllre o~ 90 (XI~) and 80 (XV) parts by
welght of a ch].oroprene homopolymer with 10 an~ 20 parts by
weight, respectively, of a ehloroprene-grn~ed cis-1,4-poly~
butadiene has Mooney viscosities ML-4/100C ol 58 ~nd 68, and
gel contents of 8 and 20% respoctively.
In the vulcanisa-tes9 the mixture ~hows excellent
strengths ~nd elongations, good low-temperature flexibility
and a low compression se~c
EXAMP~E B 9 ~Table lb)
In comparison with the pure homopolymer (V), a poly~er
mixt~re of 80 parts by weight of a chloroprene homopolymer
with 20 parts by weigh-t of a chloroprene-grafted ethylene-
propylene terpolymer (XVI) shows a higher gel content and
viscos.ity trend ~alue and, hence9 extremely good processing
properties, An increased resistance to ageing is obtained in
the vulcanisates.
EXAMPLE ~ 10 (Table lb)
A polymer mixture of 85 (XVII) and 70 (XVIII) parts by
weight of ~ nitrile rubber with 15 and 30 parts by weight,
re:spectively, of an isoprene/acrylonitrile-gr~tea polybutadiene
shows good strength and elongation values, incre~sed low-
temperature flexibility and r~duced co~pression set.
EXAMPLE B 11 (Table lb)
____.
A polymer mixture of 90 (XIX~ and 80 (XX) parts by weight
of a lithium polybutadiene with 10 and 20 parts by weight,
respeetively, of an isoprene~grafted polystyrene shows good

Le A 1~ 040 - 17 -

3~3

~tren~th An~l elo;l~ation vnlues and n very considerable
improvement :in proces~:Lbllity over lt,he pure polybut~diene.




~e A l ~ 0 4(3

~_1 J ~L~l3~ 3
.~ o
_ _. . _ _
U~ ~ o
~ ~ `D ~ ~ O . c;~
:> oo ~- ~ ~ X ~_ O ~:r
_ ---~ - ~ ~ --
O ~D~ ~ ~
o .~ ~ o o ~o
or~ X ~ C~J~
--l -----I - ~--
~,o ,~
::~ O O O ) C~l H O O O 00
W 00 ~ ~ ~O ~' r- C~ ~ ~
._ . . __ _ ._ _ _
. o - '~"-1 ~ .
~ c~ ~O O~ ~C o~ ~ 00 ~ o~ ~ ~In
- ~_ _ l __ _.
1_~ ~7~1 O~ X oo~ ~)~o ~ O u~
._ _. l __ _ _____ . __
O I_~ O
~ 1-~ ~
O O Q ~ 1_1 O O O 1--
~1 C5~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ CJ~ )
_h . _ ~ ¢ _ h


¢ o I bl) O
~1 b~ O ~ rI
bO ~r~ ~ ~ ~ O ,~
~-rl ~ O ~ t) ,~
O ~0 0 ~ ~0 0 G) ~0
. :~ ta ~ 0 ~ ,~ ,~ ~
~ _ aJ ~ p~ ~0 -' GJ ~d ~_
_ ~a a~ ~ o ~ ~ aJ ~
~ ~ ~ ~,o ~ ~ ~ ~: C~
~-r~ ~ o ~ o P.,-~ o
v) a ~ o D u) o ~ O o~a o
r~ V~ ~ ~ ~r~r~rO V~ ~_ ~ o ~ V~
o ~ o ~ a) o o o c- ~ . ~ aJ
~ ~ ~ o~ ~v ~ ~ ~
O ~ a a h ~i ,o .rJ ~a ~a ~o ~ ~ O ,:>~ a h
p~ V ~ p~ Ll P P. O ~Ll P
o ~ ~ ~ ~ o :~ 0 4~ a o ~ o L~ ~ ~ o
E3 ~ 5h ~ ~ c~ O ~ ~ J_l ~ F~ ) 5 1 ~ V
0 h 1~ d h ~ .,;O h h h rl Q ~ rl J_) O ~U h ~ P ~ rl
.S:~ bO OO b~ r~ ~ u) ,~ bO bO bO ~J rJ ~ u) r ~ I O r-l _~
.) a~ a ta ~ a~
. ~ U~ ~ O rl ~ U~ J- ~-rl ~ rl ~ U~
o a~ aJ bQ aJ o rl ~ ~1 ~J rl U~ a) r-l 9.J ~r s~
1~ U~ ~I h ~ ~ ~ h ~ U) h ~ h I ~I) J~ td U~ ~ U~ a~ J~~ ~ P. ~ p,-,l ~ ~ ~ P. ~ P~ P. h J t:: r~ al p, (n ~:~,-,1 Ll ~:
, ::1 s~ ~ t) ~ ~ ~ o o o ~ E 1: P ~ ~ h ~ ~a ~ ~o~
~ X rlr~Jr-l O r-l ~~~ O X ~-~ r-l r-l r-l rl 3 r-l O ~ ~ r-l a\ r-l O ~3 r-~ O
X ~ a~ O ,1 ~ ,c~ ~ a~ ,1 rC rl P~ $
Le A 18 040 - 19 -

33~9

QO 0~
~ ~ ~0~-
_ ~ ____-.
X
~ O O O
X ~ 1
_ _ __ ..
~ U~
~ ~ 1'~
_ _ _ . __ .__

~ o~
~ U) U~ O O
X ~ o~ ~- ~

_ ..... ~ I _ ._
~ O
~ O O ~ It~
~C oO
~ '
__ _ . .. . __ ,
O 'O COO
oo C~
_ ...... _.. _____ -
:~
X O O U~ o~
._ __ , .
.~
C)'~:
I ~ ~
aJ ~ ~ O O
.,~ ~ ~
~a ~ P ~ o
~ ~.~
O ~ ~ O
;
O ~ ~ ;~
Cl, I O ~ O
I Q~ 1~ 0 a~ o t~

O ~ O
~_ ~ h ~) ~ ~ O
, ~a) ~o :~
u) .5 1 a~ ~ ~ ~ v
~ .rl IJ ¢ W ~ ~ O aJ
F () Q~ ~ O ~ O ^ ,~
~O~ ~ O )~
,~ a ~ ~ h ~ ~ o ~ 1 s~
o ~ o a~ o I ~ X
~.~.1L) ~rl J- O O r~
o ~ r~ co ~ ~ ~ O
1 o
o h ~: h ~ r~ '~ I L) ~; ~ .r
bO ~0 h ~ J u~ ~u ~ o u) _~
I O I o h o r~ u~ ~ ~ ,~ o
O Q~ 0 a) --~a v Ll
t~ o ~ ~,~ V) ,c~
~J ~o o ta~ ~o~ a ~ .,~ o
h 1~ h
P~ 1
h O O ~O O ~ a o ,1~ ~ ~ O
a) ~) ~ h ~ E h ~ ~ ~ U) ~ E~
L) O O O O ~ Q, O :~ O ~ ~ i
P ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~: O ~
~O .,~ .~ ~ ~) ~ o U~ U) o o ~ o V
~ ;~: ~ r_
Le A 18 040 20 -

~ ~ ~3~33~
~ o
~ ~ ~ o o o In Ir~ o ~'~ co
~ ~ r~ ~ ~ r~ ) r~ r~
,1'.~ I I I I t I ~ t I I
~J O
.

~0
~ r~
o o
O O ~ r~ ~ i~ C~ ~ r~ C~ r~
t~ o r~) r~ r~ r~ ~ r~ ~ r~ r,~ ~ I I r~l I I I ~ r~l
~'1 i3 ~ ~ ~-- ~ r~) G~ ) a~ o r~
V~ r,~ r~ ~ ~ r.~ ~ ~ ~ r,~ r~J ~ C~l

h
L~
D c~ ~ O O O `~
Z ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ O a' ~ `~
~)
~3
- -------I -- - -- - - ---
r.
U~ U~
o ~ o ~ a' o ~ co


¢
~7
~ o
O O u~ ro ~ r~J ~ ~ r~ co r~ r.~ 1 r~ r~ r~ 1~ r~ ~ ~ co ~ co
I~ ~ ~O ~ ~ ~O ~O ~ ~O ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~O ~O ~O ~O Ul
o C7~ ~o ~ u~ r.~l u) co o ~o ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ c~ ~ 1~ r~ o ~ r.
:r: c~l ~o 1~ ~0 ~O ~O ~O ~0 ~ r~ O ~O ~ O ~O ~ ~O ~ O
.

0~
O ^
O (~ N ~ r~ `J ~`3 ll'l ~ r~l r~) ~ O t~) r~ ~ ~ ~n co C~ u~ o t~ .
.~ ............. ~........... ~.
_~ ~ r~ l r.~ ~ ~ r~ r~ ~ ~ ~ C~l ~ ~ ~ C~ r,~l ~ r.



0~
." ~, . o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o n n o o O ~t
JJ ~ O r~ I~ ~ r~ o ~ o ~ ~o ~- ~ o ~ '1 o c~ a~
~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ r~ r) r~ r~ r7 ~ ~ r~

Q
a~
J
.,~.C. ~ o In o co ~ O U~ O ~o o In o c~ U~ O r~l r~
~: ~, co r~ 1~ r~ ~ In r~ r~ r~ r~ 1~ u~ In r~ ~ ~0 o r~ r~ u~ ~ 1
,~ r"
. I
~ _ ~
.~
~Ir,~J
) 1 1--I 1--1 ~1 ~ ~ I--I H ~1 ,~ ' H ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C r~ ,C
r X ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~/ ~1 ~ X ~I r" X ?" ~ ~ r< 1--1

r~
Le A 18 040 - 21 -

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1131839 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-09-14
(22) Filed 1978-05-15
(45) Issued 1982-09-14
Expired 1999-09-14

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1978-05-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-02-25 1 19
Claims 1994-02-25 3 108
Abstract 1994-02-25 1 24
Cover Page 1994-02-25 1 22
Description 1994-02-25 20 836