Language selection

Search

Patent 1134933 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1134933
(21) Application Number: 349233
(54) English Title: ELECTRO-OPTIC DEVICES
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIFS ELECTRO-OPTIQUES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 345/16
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G02F 1/015 (2006.01)
  • H01L 31/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DYMENT, JOHN C. (Canada)
  • SPRINGTHORPE, ANTHONY J. (Canada)
  • STRAUS, JOZEF (Canada)
  • SINCLAIR, WILLIAM J. (Canada)
  • KOVATS, TIBOR F.I. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: WILKINSON, S.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1982-11-02
(22) Filed Date: 1980-04-03
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract






IMPROVEMENTS IN ELECTRO-OPTIC DEVICES

Abstract of the Disclosure

An electro-optic device for stabilizing the output level of a
Burrus-type light emitting diode (LED) utilizes a photodiode to monitor side
emission from an active region of the LED. Side emission closely tracks top
emission, which is launched into an output fiber. An electrical analog is
derived from the monitored side emission and is applied in a feedback loop to
control modulation level or bias current to the LED. In this way, peak optical
output (for digital systems) or r.m.s. output and linearity (for analog
systems) is stabilized. The monitoring photodiode and the LED may be spatially
separate or may form a unitary structure.

- i -


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR
PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS

1. An electro-optic device comprising:
a Burrus-type light emitting diode;
operating current generating means for generating an operating
current to the light emitting diode;
monitoring means for monitoring side emission from an active
region of the light emitting diode and for generating an electrical analog of
such monitored side emission; and
feedback means for applying said electrical analog to the
operating current generating means whereby to stabilize top emission from said
light emitting diode.

2. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 1 in which said
monitoring means is a PIN photodiode.

3. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 2 in which said
feedback means comprises a comparator, a difference signal from which comparatoris applied to the operating current generating means.

4. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 2 in which said
feedback means comprises a comparator and a gain control unit for introducing
negative feedback at said bias current generating means whereby to preserve
linearity of light emitting diode output as a function of applied operating
current.



5. A method of stabilizing top emission from a Burrus-type light
emitting diode in response to an operating current directed through an active
region of the light emitting diode, said method comprising monitoring side
emission from the light emitting diode, generating an electrical analog of said
monitored side emission and utilizing said electrical analog to vary the
operating current applied to the light emitting diode and thereby stabilize saidtop emission.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5 in which the electrical analog
is compared to a reference level and a corresponding difference signal is
applied to a d.c. bias current generating means in order to preserve a
predetermined r.m.s. optical output level from said light emitting diode when
operated in an analog mode.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 in which the electrical analog
drives a gain control unit which unit introduces negative feedback at a
modulation current generating means whereby to preserve linearity of light
emitting diode output as a function of applied bias current.

8. A method as claimed in claim S in which the electrical analog
is compared to a reference level and a corresponding difference signal is
applied to a pulse modulation current generating means in order to preserve a
predetermined peak optical output level from said light emitting diode when
operated in an analog mode.

9. An electro-optic device comprising an integrated Burrus-type
light emitting diode and a detector, the device having:




a semiconductor chip having a p-n junction layer;
the Burrus-type light emitting diode including means for
directing an operating current across a first region of the p-n junction to
stimulate light emission from said region;
the detector including means for reverse biasing another region
of the p-n junction electrically isolated from said first region for stimulatinga detector current across the second region in response to photon emission from
the first region incident on the second region;
the device further comprising feedback means for varying the
operating current across the first junction region in response to the detector
current whereby to stabilize light output of the Burrus-type light emitting
diode.

10. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 9 in which the
Burrus-type LED and the detector have a common grounded top contact and
separate bottom contacts for providing respectively forward and negative
biasing of said first and second junction regions.

11. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 10 in which the
bottom contacts are generally parallel stripes.

12. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 11 in which the
semiconductor chip overlying the stripe contacts is rendered highly resistive
intermediate the stripe contacts.

13. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 10 in which the
chip has an elongate well over the Burrus LED bottom contact, the LED top
contact formed on an upper surface of the chip bounding the well.




14. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 9 in which the
detector bottom contact is larger than the emitter bottom contact.

15. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 9 in which said
feedback means comprises a comparator, a difference signal from which comparatoris applied to, and controls, an operating current generating means.

16. An electro-optic device as claimed in claim 15 in which the
difference signal from the comparator is fed to an automatic gain control unit
and the output of said unit controls the output level of a.c. modulation currentfrom said operating current generating means.

17. An electro-optic device as claimed in any of claims 9 to 11 in
which the semiconductor is doped gallium aluminum arsenide.

18. An electro-optic device as claimed in any of claims 9 to 11 in
which said first and second regions are physically and electrically isolated by
an etched well.

11

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~L3~33

This invention relates to light emitting diode devices adapted to
give stabilized light output.
One of the primary light sources used in fiber optic
co~munications s~stems is the light emitting diode (LED) which consists
essentially of a p-n junction in which injection of current carriers causes
electron-hole recombination with an associated spontaneous photon emission when
the device is forward biased.
To transmit information, bias current to the LED is modulated by
a modulating signal to give a corresponding variation in light output. In
order that the light output is an accurate analog of the modulating signal,
the LED operating characteristic, i.e. optical OUtpllt level and linearity (for
analog operation) must be stabilized against aging and temperature-related
variation.
To stabilize LED output, the output level is monitored and bias
current adjusted in order to restore the particular light characteristic of
interest.
In the past, monitoring was achieved by tapping a small,
predetermined fraction of light from the output fiber. In one method, a
tapping fiber is wrapped around and fused with the output fiberq In another
method the output fiber is merely sharply bent in order to couple light out of
the fiber. In both cases it is found that the light in the monitoring fiber
tracks light in the output fiber only to within about 10%. Consequently the
level of light launched into the output Fiber cannot be accurately assessed.
Since for both of these arrangements light for monitoring
purposes is taken from output light propagating along the output fibre, the
light output desirable for transmission of inFormation is somewha~ decreased.
Consequently, for a particular transmission length, greater amplification is

` 1 ~,

113~33

required to compensate for ~he correspondlng reduction in signal to noise
ratio.
In its broadest aspect, this invention proposes ~onitoring the
level of side emitted light from the active region oF a Burrus-type LED the
side emission being a predetermined fraction of LED top emission ~rom the
active region and thus providing an analo~ of the top emission. Monitoring
means ~or monitoring the side emission can be spatially separated from the LED
or can be integrally fabricated with the LED. In the latter case a forward
biased p-n light emitting junction in the LED structure is reverse-biased to
function as a light sensitive junction in the monitoring means. The intensity
level of LED side emission tracks LED top emission very closely. In a fibre
optic system, the Burrus-type LED top emission is normally launched into an
output fibre. Side emission, being of an appreciably lower intensity, has
hitherto been neglected.
In both of the cases described, an electrical analog of the
monitored side emission light is used to modify operating currents directed to
the LED. With an appropriate feedback loop, either the peak optical power
Ifor digital systems) or the r.m.s. power tfor analog systems) can be
stabilized. In addition, for analog systems, the linearity can also be
stabilized.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of
example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a sectional view showing an electro-optic device
according to the invention,
Figure 2 shows a feedback network for stabilizing LED light
output as a function of modulating current;
Figure 3 is a cross sectional view showing a monolithic
:.

i~ 2




", ` . '~. ;. - ' ~ :' : . ': ' ' .' `.,.'~ ` ''.,, ,':,` .. ,!., . `

" S , , ~ ~ ;,, ' ' ` , `, " ' , ~" ' , , ,~ , " , . .

.3~333

electro-optic device according to the invention.
Referring firstly to Figure 1, there is shown a Burrus-type light
emitting diode (LED) 10 having a dou21e heterostructure layered construction.
A 0~2 to 1 micron active layer 12 of p-type GaAlAs is flanked by a 4 micron
confining layer 14 of n-type GaAlAs and a 1.5 micron confining layer 16 of
p-type GaAlAs. A substrate layer 18 of n-type GaAs is etched to produce a well
20 extending ~o the confining layer 14. Over the outer surface of the
substrate is deposited a 2500A contact layer 22 of Au/Ge. On the undersurface
of the confining layer 16 is chemically vapour deposited a SiO2 insulating
layer 24 except at a 75 micron diameter window 26 where the exposed confining
layer is subjected to a zinc skin diffusion step. The zinc diffused region 28
has a contact layer 30 of 70A units of Cr and 2500A of Au applied to it.
Subsequently, a 5-10 micron gold contact layer 32 is plated over the bottom of
the device to function as a heat sink. Connecting leads (not shown) are then
soldered to the contact layers 22 and 32.
The LED is mounted against one wall of a hermetically sealed
chamber 34 which protects the LED from damaging atmospheric conditions. The
connecting leads and an output optical fiber 38, whose end is secured into the
well 20 by epoxy 40, exit the chamber 34 through hermetically sealed
feedthroughs (not shown~ in the chamber walls. When current is directed
through the LED via contacts 22 and 32, spontaneous light emission occurs. A
major part of this light is emitted perpendicularly to the LED active layer as
top emission. Since the top conflning layer 14 is very thin, only a small
proportion of the top emission is absorbed before the light is launched
into the end of optical fibre 38.
The spontaneous emission is emitted in all directions, a portion
of the light tending to be guided at the junction plane. Typically, this light


, ,


, , . . ~, . . .

.. ,


: . .. . , . .,
,. .
.. .. . . ..

~l~L;~ 3 3

travels through over 200 microns mainly along the active layer 12 but also
along the confining layers 14 and 16. Consequently a large proport1On of the
total side emission fronn the LED active rlegion is absorbed and side emission
actually emitted from the LED chip is an order oF magnitude less than that
available as top e~ission. As illustrated by J.C. Dyment et al (IEEE
Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. E.D. 24 No. 7, July l977), typically the
top emission ranges from 0 - 25 mW for a correspond;ng rise in side em;ssion
from 0 - 800 microwatts with operating current varying from 0 - 600 mA.
For fibreoptic systems purposes where long lifetime is desired
the drive current is usually maintained below 150 mA and it has been
ascertained that in the 0 - 150 mA range, the proportion of side emission to
top emission emitted from the LED active region is substantially uniform. In
one example, side emission tracked top emission within 1% over the current
range of 5 to 150 mA and was within 0.5% over the current range of 50 to 110
mA.
Mounted on another wall of the chamber 34 and spaced from the
nearest side surface of the LED 10 is a PIN photodiode 42. The PIN photodiode
is of a conventional form having metal contact regions 4~ and 4fi and n- and
p-type silicon semiconductor regions 48 and 50 respectively. The top contact
44 which is separated from p-type region 50 by an oxide layer 52 has a ~indow
53 through which incident photons pass, the photons penetrating to the p-n
jun~tion region to render the junction region conducting through
electron-hole pair generation when reverse bias is applied. The PIN
photo-diode 42 receives light from one face of the LED. As indicated
previously, the light intensity provides an accurate analog of output light
launched into the fibre 38. If the output of the LED decreases through aging
cr because of telnperature fluctuations, the top emission from the LED is

~L~3/~933

reduced. The monitored light is used to generate a control signal which is
applied via a feedback loop to a LED driver clrcuit to preserve constant
optical power output and also to improve linearity.
Referring to Figure 2, the feedback circuit shows schematically
the LED 10 and photodiode 42~ Photodiode output is amplified at an amplifier
54 before feeding into a comparator 56 for comparison with a reference voltage
corresponding to a preset peak optical power (digital) or r.m.s, optical power
(analog). The comparator output is fed to a current generating network 58 for
modifying DC bias current 59 or modulation current 60, respectively.
For analog systems, the comparator outpuk can also be fed to an
automatic gain control unit 62 (broken line). An LED operating level and
corresponding photodiode current are first determined. The gain control unit 62
is then set to apply negative feedback to the current generating network 58
proportional to excursions of the photodiode current output from that operat~ng
level. The negative feedback improves linearity so ensuring that output light
launched into fibre 38 is a more accurate representation oF the impressed AC
modulation 60.
Referring now to Figure 3 there is shown an electro-optic deYice
which is functionally similar to Figure 1 but in which an LED 6~ and a
photodiode monitor 66 are fabricated side-by-side as a unitary structure. A
particular advantage of this device is that the LED p-n junction is grown
simultaneously with, and as an extension oF, the photodiode monitoring
junction. As shown, a GaAs substrate 68 has epitaxially grown thereon GaAlAs
c~nfining and active layers 70, 72 and 74. The chip is formed with a contact
layer 76a, 76b, the contact layer and the substrate 68 being etched through to
produce a well 78. On a lower surface, a chemically Yapour deposited
insulating layer 80 of SiO2 is photo-defined to produce windows 82. A




. . , ~ ., . . . . , , . .. -, , :- ~ . . . . . : ..

- ~3~33

Cr/Au contact layer 84 is vacuum deposited through the windows and gold
heatsinks 86, 87 are electroplated over the chip lower surface. Leads ~8
connect contact 76a and heatsink 86 into an operating current generating
circuit shown schematically as current generator 90 and variable resistor 92.
Leads 94 connect contact 76b and heatsink 87 into a monitoring c;rcuit shown
schematically as hattery 96 and signal level indicator 98.
Electrical isolation between the forward biased p-n Junction
region of the emitter and the reverse biased p-n junction region of the
detector is produced by etching a well 75 through to the top confining layer
70.
Although not shown, it will be understood that the output of
signal level indicator 98 is used to control a feedback circuit similar to one
of those shown in Figure 2 for stabilizing optical power output level or
linearity.
In operation, when a current is directed through the LED 64 via
the DC bias generating circuit 90, top emission takes place into the well 78
and side emission propagates through a guiding layer comprising the active
layer 74 and adjacent parts of the confining layer 70 and 72. In a p-n
junction region above window 82 which is subject to a reverse bias voltage of
about 4 to 5V, incident photons, which are absorbed energize electron-hole
pairs in a depletion region causing a current flow which is recorded at the
level detector 98. Part of the emitted light impinges on the detector after
radiation across the gap between emitter and detector mesas defined by well 753
Further light is guided around the well 75.
In one example of a monolithic emitter-detector fabricated, a
current range of between 100 and 200 mA directed through the emitter produced a

3~33

monitored current of between 50 and 100 microamps at the level dekector 98.
Tracking was found to be within 1%.
As shown, the detector contact 85 is larger in area than the
emitter bottom contact 84 so as to increase the size of the region over which
electron-hole pair recombination takes place in the detector. However, a
symmetrical device can be fabricated with a detecting section identical with
the emitting section shown in Figure 3. This permits the device to be used as
a dual source LED if preferred to an emitter-detector combination device.
Although not illustrated~ a structure having a single central well can be
fabricated characterized by a bottom contact pattern including an internal spot
contact for the emitter and an external ring contact for the detector. Some
variation from symmetry will be required, in practice~ in order to permit
soldering of connecting leads and the provision of a heatsink for the emitter.
Although the invention is described in terms of a double hetero-
structure, it will be clear to those skilled in the semiconductor LED art that
single heterostructures or homojunction devices can be fabricated in a similar
manner. In addition, although the embodiments described have an LED
fabricated from GaAlAs, other III - V compounds can be used.



Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1134933 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1982-11-02
(22) Filed 1980-04-03
(45) Issued 1982-11-02
Expired 1999-11-02

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1980-04-03
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NORTHERN TELECOM LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-02-23 1 40
Claims 1994-02-23 4 165
Abstract 1994-02-23 1 29
Cover Page 1994-02-23 1 37
Description 1994-02-23 7 343