Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
1 This invention relates to a polyethylene resin
composition having excellent physical properties and
moldability, as well as to an ethylene polymerization
process for producing said resin composition with a high
productivity.
The characterlstic properties of polyethylene
required vary depending on the method of molding and
use, and the characteristic properties o~ the polymer
are designed so as to ~it ~or them. That is, a polymer
having a relatively low molecular weight and a narrow
molecular weight distribution is suitable for articles
to be molded by injection molding process, while a
polymer having a relatively high molecular weight and
a broad molecular weight distribution is used for
15 articles to be molded by extrusion, namely blow molding .
or inflation molding process.
As a process ~or producing a polyethylene
having a broad molecular weight distribution and used
for extrusion molding, a number of processes are
proposed.
As one of them, there is proposed a process
which comprises melting and mixing together a high
molecular weight polyethylene and a low molecular :
weight polyethylene produced elsewhere (Japanese Patent
Publication No. 3,215/1970; Japanese Patent Publication
.
'~
:' -
113Bl~t~
1 No- 22~007/1970).
As another process, the multi-step polymeriza-
tion process having two or more steps lnas been attempted
(Japanese Patent Publication No. 11,349/1971; Japanese
Patent Publication No. 42,716/1973; Japanese Patent
Kokai (Laid-Open) No. 47,079/1976; Japanese Patent
Kokai (Laid-Open) No. 19,788/1977).
The polymers produced by these processes have
very excellent physical properties. That is, the
polymers are superior to polymers produced by conventio-
nal processes in the balance of stiffness and environ-
mental stress cracking resistance (ESCR), so that an
article molded from the polymers exhibits sufficient
strength and chemical resistance with a low thickness.
Accordingly, a bottle molded by the ~se of this resin
is light-weight and can sufficiently compete with
conventional products in point of strength, so that its
industrial value is quite high from the viewpoints of
economizing resources and energies. Further, its high
stiffness and good ESCR enable to use it under more
severe conditions than ever and to give a product having
a higher functionality than ever.
Though a polymer produced by the above-
mentioned processes has excellent performances mentioned
above, it also has the following faults. That is, it
shows a lower die swell than conventional polyethylene,
it shows a low melt tension, and it is inferior in
moldability. When a molten polymer is extruded from
-- 2 --
1138~8
l the die of molding machine, a swelling occurs due to
Barus effect. This is called die swell. In the case of
blow molding, a bottle is formed from cylindrical
molten polymer having a constant length (parison).
Polyethylene molding makers use many kinds of poly-
ethylene grades for the sake of manufacturing articles
meeting the various requirements of market. Since the
polyethylene produced by mixing high molecular weight
and low molecular weight polyethylenes or by the multi-
step polymerization process is lower than these polymersin die swell, a bottle molded from it has a low wall
thickness and product having constant quality is
difficult to obtain. Exchange of die is necessary to
the control of wall thickness, which decreases produc-
tivity and necessitates spare dies. As above, a greatdifference in die swell brings about a great disadvan-
tage industrially.
This invention provides a composition having
good physical properties and capable of overcoming these
faults, as well as a process for producing said
composition.
Thus, this invention relates to a polyethylene
composition comprising a mixture of three kinds of
polyethylenes (A), (B) and (C) wherein:
(i) the viscosity average molecular wegiht of (A)
is l,000-lO0,000, the viscosity average molecular weight
of (B) is lO0,000-1,000,000, the viscosity average
molecular weight of (C) is 400,ooo-6,ooo,ooo, the
1138148
1 molecular weight ratio o~ B to A (B/A) is 2-100, and
the molecular weight ratio of C to B (C/B) is 1.5 or
more,
(ii) the mixing ratio (A)/(B) is 30/70 to 70/30
and the mixing ratio of ~C) in the composition is 1-10%
by weight, and
(iii) the composition has a melt index of 1 or less,
as well as to a process for producing said composition.
According to this invention, there is provided
a polyethylene composition having an extensive industrial
applicability, having a controlled die swell, a high
melt tension and an excellent moldability, exhibiting a
high stiffness and a high ESCR, quite excellent in
physical properties and suitable for blow molding.
The polyethylenes (A), (~) and (C) which are
the constituents of this invention are homopolymers of
ethylene or copolymers of ethylene and other olefins
or dienes. As said other olefins and dienes used in
the copolymerization, ~-olefins such as propylene,
butene, pentene, 4-methylpentene-1, hexene, octene,
decene and the like, diolefins such as butadiene,
isoprene and the like, and cycloolefins such as
cyclopentene, cyclohexene, cyclopentadiene, norbornene
and the like can be referred to.
Polyethylene (A) is the so-called high density
polyethylene having an average molecular weight of
1,000-100,000 and preferably 5,000-70,000 and a density
of 0.94-0.98.
113~3148
1 Polyethylene (B) has an average molecular
weight of 100,000-1,000,000 and preferable 300,000-
800,000 and a density of 0.90-0.97.
The molecular weight ratio of (A) to (B) is
2-200 and preferably 5-100. If the molecular weight
ratio is lower than 2, the excellent physical properties
of this invention are difficult to obtain and the
molecular weight distribution cannot be broad sufficient-
ly so that the moldability becomes poor. On the other
hand, if the molecular weight ratio exceeds 200, there
is no advantage in improving physical properties and
moldability and there is a disadvantage from the
viewpoint of manufacture of the polymer.
Polyethylene (C) has an average molecular
weight of 40o,000-6,000,000 and preferably 600,000-
4,000,000 and a density of 3.88-0.96.
The molecular weight ratio of (C) to (B)
((C)/(Bj) is 1.5 or more and preferably 2 or more. If
the molecular weight ratio is lower than 1.5 or the
molecular weight of (C) is less than 400,000, the
excellent physical properties of this invention are
difficult to obtain and particularly the effect of
enhancing the die swell and the effect of enhancing the
melt tension and thereby improving the moldability,
which are both the characteristic features of this
invention, cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if
the molecular weight of (C) exceeds 6,ooo,ooo, the
uniformity of the composition is injured.
~138~48
1 Next, the mixing ratios between constituents
(A), (B) and (C) will be explained. The ratio of (A)
to CB) is in the range of 30/70 to 70/30 and preferably
40/60 to 60/40. If the proportion of (A) or (B)
exceeds 70%, excellent physical properties and molda-
bility cannot be obtained.
The mixing ratio of constituent (C) in the
composition is 1-10% by weight and preferably 3-8% by
weight. By mixing it within this range, the die
swell and the melt tension can be improved and a compo-
sition having good physical properties and moldability
can be obtained. If the amount of component (C) mixed
is small, no effect is obtained. If it exceeds 10%,
the melt index of the final composition becomes too
low so that the composition becomes poor in moldability
and uniformity.
In mixing the three components (A~, (B) and
~C), (A), (B) and (C) may be mixed and kneaded simul-
taneously, or it is also allowable to previously mix
any two of the three components and then mix and knead
the third component therewith. Any of these two mixing
methods may be employed. The mixing of these components
is carried out under usual conditions in a molten state
by using usual extruder or kneader. As said extruder,
any of single screw type and double screw type may be
used. As that of double screw type, CIM ~anufactured
by, for example, The Japan Steel Works, Ltd., as well
- . :
.
, . ' '
~13~ 8
1 as FCM, DSM and the like manufactured by Farrel Co. may
be used. As said kneader, Banbury mixer may be used,
for example.
The composition thus produced has a melt index
of 0.001-1 and preferably 0.005-0.5, a density of
3.967-0.935 and a molecular weight distribution of 60
or more and preferably 75 or more in terms of MIR, and
it is a polymer suitable for extrusion molding.
The polyethylenes (A), (B) and (C) can be
produced by the usual suspension polymerization, gas
phase polymerization or solution polymerization using
the low-pressure or medium pressure process. The
catalyst used in the polymerization may be any catalyst,
so far as it can produce the polyethylenes (A), (B) and
(C). Industrially, however, such a high-activity
catalyst comprising transition metal compound and
organometallic compound as mentioned later and claimed
in this application is preferable, because a step for
removing the catalyst may be omitted in case using this
catalyst.
In producing the composition of this invention,
it is allowable to produce polyethylenes CA~, CB) and
(C) separately by the usual polymerization process and
then mix them together as mentioned above. In order to
more enhance the uniformity of the composition, however,
it is preferable to produce the composition by a multi-
step continuous polymerization comprising three or more
steps.
-- 7 --
~13B~48
1 Next, the production process by multi-step
polymerization will be explained.
As the polymerization catalyst, catalysts
comprising a transition metal compound and an organo-
5 metallic compound are used, and those invented by thepresent inventors and mentioned in Japanese Patent
Publication Nos. 36,788/1977, 36,790/1977, 36,791/1977,
36,792/1977, 50,070/1977, 36,794/1977, 36,795/1977,
36,796/1977, 36,915/1977, 36,917/1977 and 6, olg/1978
and Japanese Patent Kokai (Laid-Open) Nos. 21,876/1975,
31,835/1975, 72,044/1975, 78,619/1975 and 40,696/1978
are effective. They comprise a solid catalyst component
(A) and an organometallic compound (B), wherein said
solid catalyst component (A) is obtainable by reacting
the following (i) and (ii) or ~i), (ii) and (iiij:
(i) an organomagnesium compound represented ~y
the following general formula:
M~Mg~RlpR2qxrys
wherein ~ is a number equal to or greater than O; ~ is
a number greater than O; p, q, r and s are numbers eaual
to or greater than O and having the following relation:
p + q + r + s = m~ + 2~;
(m is the balence of M mentioned below) M is metallic
element belonging to the I-III group of the periodic
table; Rl and R2 are hydrocarbon groups having identical
or different number of carbon atoms; ~ and Y, identical
~138~48
l or dif erent, represent halogen, oR3, oSiR4R5R6, NR7R8
or SR9 wherein R3, R4, R5, R5, R7 and R8 represent
hydrogen atom or hydrocarbon group and R9 represents
hydrocarbon group;
(ii) a titanium compound or a vanadium compound
having at least one halogen atom;
(iii) a halide compound of Al, B, Si, Ge, Sn, Te or
Sb. As said organometallic compound (B) compounds of
the metals belonging to the I-III groups of the periodic
table are used, among which complexes comprising
organoaluminum compound and organomagnesium compound are
particularly preferable.
The reaction between the catalyst component
(A) and the organometallic compound component ~B) can
be carried out by adding both the components into the
polymerization system and making it progress under the
polymerization conditions with the progress of the
polymerization, though it may also be carried out prior
to the polymerization. The proportion of the cataiyst
components reacted is preferably in the range of
1-3,000 mmoles of (B) component per 1 g of CA? component.
In place of catalyst component CA), a titanium compound
supported on an inorganic magnesium compound may also
be used.
The polymerization is carried out in a
saturated hydrocarbon having 4-10 carbon atoms. The
step for obtaining the high molecular weight polyethylene
(C) having an average molecular weight of 400,000 or
1138148
1 more may be any step of the multi-step polymerization.
In order to obtain a high molecular weight, however, it
is necessary that the concentration of molecular weight
regulator (for example, hydrogen) is very low. Accor-
dingly, it is advantageous to produce (C) in the firstor last step of the polymerization as shown by the
following scheme (a) or (b):
(a) (C)-(B)-(A) or (C)-(A)-(B)
(b) (A)-(B)-(C)
Hereunder, the procedure will be explained
with reference to the case of first of all polymerizing
(C), for the sake of simplifying the description.
For obtaining a high molecular weight
polyethylene (C), the polymerization is carried out at
a pressure of 0.5-20 kg/cm2 G, preferably 0.5-10 kg/cm2
G, and at a polymerization temperature of 30-110,
preferably 40-80C, to obtain a polyethylene ~C) satis-
fying the above-mentioned conditions. This polymerization
for obtaining (C) may also be carried out by a batch
process.
The polymerizations of the second and later
steps are carried out at a polymerization temperature
of 110C or below, referably in the range of 60-90C,
and at a polymerization pressure ranging from 1 to
30 kg/cm G.
`~ With reference to the drawing, a typical flow
of this invention will be explained below in detail.
-- 10 -
,
1138148
1 From line (2), ethylene, hexane, catalyst and
the like are fed into polymerization apparatus (1) of
the first step where the polymerization is carried out
to give a high molecular weight polymer (C) having an
average molecular weight of 400,000 or more. The slurry
containing the high molecular weight polyethylene thus
formed is introduced into the polymerization apparatus
(4) of the second step by means of pump (3).
In the polymerization apparatus (4), ethylene,
hexane, hydrogen, catalyst components etc. are fed from
line (5) and polymerized to give low molecular weight
polyethylene (A). The slurry in the polymerization
apparatus (4) is led into flash drum (6) where the
unreacted ethylene and hydrogen are removed. The
ethylene and hydrogen removed are brought into a state
of higher pressure by compressor (7) and returned to
the polymerization apparatus (4). On the other hand,
the slurry in the flash drum is introduced into
polymerization apparatus (9) of the third step by pump
(8).
In polymerization apparatus C9), ethylene,
hexane, catalyst components etc. are fed ~rom line Clo)
and polymerized to give high molecular weight poly-
ethylene CB), whereby the molecular weight of the
polymer is adjusted to the intended ultimate value.
The polymer in the polymerization apparatus (9) is
after-treated and then withdrawn as a product.
The flow explained above is one of the ~ypical
: ,
1138~48
1 examples of this invention, and it is also allowable,
if necessary, to produce high molecular weight poly-
ethylene (B) in polymerization apparatus (4) and low
molecular weight polyethylene (A) in polymerization
apparatus (9). In this case flash drum (o) can be
omitted. It is also allowable to circulate the content
of the polymerization apparatus of later step, i.e.
(9), into the preceding polymerization apparatus, i.e.
(4).
According to such a flow sheet, the polymeri-
zation is carried out continuously and a polymer having
good physical properties can be obtained.
The polymerization of this invention is not
limited to homopolymerization of ethylene but it may
also be a copolymerization of ethylene and 0.5-20% by
mole of other olefin such as propylene, butene, 4-
methylpentene-l, hexene, octene, butadiene, isoprene or
the like. By these copolymerizations, polymers having
respective characteristic features in physical properties
can be obtained.
As is apparent from the description given above
and the examples mentioned later, the characteristic
feature of this invention consists in the following
points. Thus, in the first place, this invention gives
a polyethylene composition having an extensive industrial
applicability, a controlled die swell, a broad molecular
weight distribution and a high stiffness, exhibiting a
high ESCR, quite excellent in physical properties and
:
1138148
1 suitable for blow molding. In ,,he second place, such
a composition can be obtained with a high productivity
by a continuous polymerization. In the third place,
this invention provides a method for controlling the
die swell of polymer for blow molding by means of a
continuous polymerization and a method for enhancing
melt tension and thereby improving moldability.
Hereunder, this invention will be illustrated
in more detail by way of examples, but the invention is
by no means limited by these examples.
The meanings of the symbols used in the
examples and comparative examples and the conditions of
the measurements therefor are as follows:
(i) MI: It expresses melt index. It was measured
according to ASTM D-1238 at a temperature of 190C under
a load of 2.16 kg.
(ii~ MIR: It means the quotient obtainable by
dividing the value of MI measured under the conditions
of MI measurement under a high load of 21.6 kg with the
value of MI of the above-mentioned paragraph (i). It
is a measure of molecular weight distribution. Its
higher value means a broader molecular weight distribu-
tion.
Ciii~ Molecular weight (Mw): Mw was determined from
intrinsic viscosity [n~ measured in decalin at 135C and
according to the following equation:
~n~ = 6.8 x 10-4MW0 67
1138148
l which is mentioned in Journal of Polymer Science, 36,
91 (1957).
(iv) Density: Real density measured according to
ASTM D-1505.
5 (v) ESCR: It indicates environmental stress
cracking resistance. It is measured by introducing a
nonionic surfactant into a 500 ml bottle (weight 42 g,
wall thickness o.8 mm) molded by means of a 50~ blow
molding machine at a cylinder temperature of 160C and
a die temperature of 40C so as to fill up 10% of the
inner volume, placing the bottle in an oven kept at
60C and applying a constant inner pressure. ESCR is
expressed by the length of time required for breaking
50% of the tested bottles.
(vi) Die swell: It is expressed by the weight of
parison, per 20 cm, extruded at a temperature of 170C
by the use of a blow molding die having an outer diameter
of 16 mm and an inner diameter of 10 mm.
Example l
(a) Synthesis of catalyst
An organoaluminum-magnesium complex having
' Al~g6(C2H5)3(n-C4H9~l2 was Synthesized
by introducing 138 g of di-n-butylmagnesium and 19 g of
triethylaluminum together with 2 liters of n-heptane
into a stirring tank having a capacity of 4 liters and
allowing to react at 80C for 2 hours. After moisture
and oxygen had been removed by substitution with dry
: , .:
. .
. ~ . ,,, :
1138148
1 nitrogen, 800 ml of a n-heptane solution containing 400
mmoles (54 g) of this com~lex was reacted with 800 ml
of a n-heptane solution containing 400 mmoles of
titanium tetrachloride at -20C ~or 4 hours with stirr-
ing. The resulting hydrocarbon-insoluble solid was
isolated and washed with n-heptane to obtain 106 g of
a solid.
The solid thus obtained was diluted with n-
hexane and used for polymerization.
(b) Production of polyethylene
By using a stainless made polymerization
apparatus (9) having a reaction volume of 200 liters,
polyethylene was produced by continuous polymerization.
The polymerization was controlled at a polymerization
temperature of 86C and a polymerization pressure of
12 kg/cm G. As catalyst, triethylaluminum was
introduced at a concentration of 0.5 mmole/liter. A
solid catalyst was also introduced at a rate of about
3.5 g/hour together with hexane at a rate of 30 liters/
hour so as to give a polymer formation of 8 kg/hour.
Hydrogen, having a concentration of about 75%, was used
as a molecular weight regulator. Thus, polyethylene
~A) having a molecular weight of 25,000 was obtained.
The catalytic effect was 110,000 g polymer/g-Ti.
Polyethylene (B) was produced under the same
conditions as in polyethylene (A), except that concen-
tration of hydrogen was about 15% and solid catalyst
was fed at a rate of about 0.5 g/hour. As the result,
- 15 -
,
:
113B148
1 polyethylene (B) having a molecular weight of 320,000
was obtained. The catalytic e~fect was 780,000 g
polymer/g-Ti.
Polyethylene (C) was produced under the same
conditions as in polyethylene (A), except that concen-
tration of hydrogen was about 2%, the pressure was
8 kg/cm2 G, the polymerization temperature was 73C and
the solid catalyst was fed at a rate of about 0.4 g/
hour. As the result, polyethylene (C) having a molecular
weight of 1,000,000 was obtained. The catalytic effect
was 970,000 g polymer/g-Ti.
(c) Production of polyethylene composition
The polyethylenes (A) and (B) produced in (b)
were mixed together at a ratio of 50 : 50, to which was
added 5% by weight of polyethylene (C). The mixture
was kneaded together with 1,000 ppm of Irganox 1076 and
1,000 ppm of calcium stearate and extruded at 190C by
means of an extruder of 40 mm~ to give pellets.
Characteristic properties of this composition are shown
in Table 1. The composition exhibits good physical
properties in that ESCR and stiffness are well balanced
and die swell is also high.
Example 2
A composition was produced by multi-step
continuous polymerization using the same catalyst as in
Example 1.
Thus, into polymerization apparatus (1) having
11~38148
1 an inner volume of 20 liters, the same solid catalyst as
in Example 1 was fed at a rate of 1.3 mmoles (based on
Ti atom)/hour and triethylaluminum was fed at a rate of
20 mmoles (based on metallic atom)/hour. ~lso, purified
hexane was fed at a rate of 40 liters/hour and ethylene
was fed into polymerization apparatus (1) at a rate of
about 1.0 NM3/hour. Polymerization was carried out by
adjusting the conditions o~ polymerization apparatus
(1) to a polymerization temperature of 60C and a
pressure of 3 kg/cm2 G, whereby polyethylene (C) was
obtained. The polymer slurry formed by this polymeriza-
tion was brought into a state of elevated pressure with
slurry pump (3) and introduced into polymerization
apparatus (4) having an inner volume of 300 liters at
a pressure of 15 kg/cm G and a temperature of 85C.
Into the polymerization apparatus (4), ethylene was
introduced at a rate of 7 NM3/hour and hydrogen was
introduced at a rate of 0.25 NM3/hour, and polymeriza-
tion was carried out to give polyethylene (A). The
polymer slurry in the polymerization apparatus (4) was
led to flash drum (6) having a pressure of 1 kg/cm2 G
and a temperature of 75C where unreacted ethylene and
hydrogen were separated. Then the slurry was brought
into a state of elevated pressure and introduced into
polymerization apparatus (9) by means of slurry pump
(8). Polymerization apparatus (9) was kept at a
temperature of 73C and a pressure of 8 kg/cm2 G, to
which purified n-hexane, triethylaluminum, ethylene,
113B~48
1 hydrogen and butene were fed at rates of, respectively,
40 liters/hour, 20 mmoles/hour, 7.2 NM3/hour, 0.02
NM3/hour and 17 mmoles/hour to produce polyethylene (B).
The capacity of polymerization apparatus (9) was 200
liters.
After the three steps of polymerization were
carried out as above, the polymer taken out from
polymerization apparatus (9) had a melt index of 0.3,
and other physical properties of this polymer were
good similarly to Example 1, as shown in Table 1. The
surface of the molded bottle was better than that
obtained in Example 1 and more improved in uniformity.
The polyethylene formed in polymerization apparatus (1)
had an average molecular wei~ht of about 2,000,000 and
the proportion of its formation to the total formation
(the sum of formation in polymerization apparatuses (1),
(~) and (9)) was 6%.
The molecular weight of polymer (A) polymerized
in the polymerization apparatus of the second step and
the molecular weight of polymer (B) polymerized in the
polymerization apparatus of the third step were determined
by measuring MI of the polymers leaving respective poly-
merization apparatuses, estimating the MI values of the
polymers formed in respective polymerization ~pparatuses
from the following relation:
MI -0.175 = xMI -0.175 + yMIy
x + y = 1
- 18 -
1138148
l (Journal of Polymer Science, Part A, 2, 2977-3007
(1964)) and determining their molecular weights from
the actually measured relationship between MI and n,
wherein:
x, y: weight fractions of polymer formation
velocity in respective polymerization
apparatuses,
MIt: melt index of the final polymer which has
passed the two polymerization apparatuses,
MIX: melt index in the polymerization apparatus x,
and
MIy: melt index in the polymerization apparatus y.
A That is, ~ is determined from the observed
values of MIt and MIX.
Molecular weights of the polymers of the
second and third steps were 21,000 and 260,000, respec-
tively, as determined by the above-mentioned procedure.
Example 3
Polymerization was carried out in the same
manner as in Example 2 with the same catalyst as in
Example l, provided that the polymerization conditions
of the third step for making polyethylene (B) were the
same as in Example 2 except that the temperature was
65C and hydrogen was fed at a rate of 0.01 NM3/hour.
The polymer obtained by this polymerization
had a MI of 0.04. Other physical properties of this
polymer are shown in Table 1.
- 19 -
: -
1~3B~4B
1 Example 4
In the same manner as in Example 1, the
polyethylenes (A) and (B) obtained in Example 1 were
mixed together at a ratio of 45 : 55, to which was
added 3% of the polyethylene (C) obtained in Example 1.
Together with additives, the mixture was kneaded and
extruded to give pellets. Characteristic properties of
this composition are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 1
A polyethylene having a MI value of 0.3 was
produced by one step polymerization by using the same
catalyst as in Example 1. Characteristic properties
of this polyethylene are shown in Table 1. It has a
low MIR and is very poor in moldability. Further, it
exhibits a low ESCR and a low die swell.
Comparative Example 2
Polyethylenes (A) and (B) were produced by
repeating the procedure of Example 1, provided that the
polyethylene (B) had a molecular weight of 400,000.
The two components (A) and (B) were mixed together at a
ratio of 50 : 50. The same additives as in Example 1
were added to the mixture, from which pellets were
made.
The results are shown in Table 1. Though the
composition has a high ESCR and a high MIR, it has a
low die swell.
- 20 -
1~38~41~
l Comparative Example 3
3y using the same catalyst as in Example l,
polymerizations corresponding to the second and third
steps of Example 2 were practised without practising
the super-high molecular weight polymerization of t'ne
first step of Example 2.
A polymerization corresponding to the second
step of the polymerization of Example 2 was practised
in the first step and a polymerization corresponding to
the third step of the polymerization of Example 2 was
practised in the second step. The polymerization
conditions in the first step were nearly the same as in
the second step of Example 2, and the polymer obtained
had a molecular weight of 21,000. The polymerization
conditions in the second step were nearly ~he same as
in the third step of Example 2, except that the feed of
hydrogen was approximately zero. The polymer obtained
had MI of 0.31. Its physical properties are shown in
Table 1. As seen, it exhibits a low die swell though
it shows a good balance between ESCR and stiffness.
Comparative Example 4
Polyethylenes CA), (B~ and (C) were produced
in the same manner as in Example l, except that poly-
ethylene (C) had a molecular weight of 430,000,
components (A) and (B) were mixed together at a ratio
of 50 : 50 and (C) was added thereto in a proportion
of 6% based on the total composition. The same
- 21 -
1138148
1 additives as in Example 1 were added to the mixture,
from which pellets were made. The results are shown in
Table 1. Though ESCR and MIR are both high, the rise
in die swell is ver~ small.
- 22 -
~- ' ''
,
:: :
' '
113814~
=1~' - ~ - ~ 0
3~0~ l _
s {~ ~ ~ m
a~~ 1- ~ ~
O :~ O I o O o O _ ~_ o
~^ o o o o o
a,SC> o o o o l l l ~
O ~o r~^ ~^ ~l ~1
I ~ o _ _ ___
,~ ~ ~o o ~--~ ,
R ~; ~ N O 3 3 3 ~I ~
.1 ~I ~1 00 .-~ ~`J C~l ~ (~I
~D ~ ~ C~ ~
O O O O O O O O
P; L~ u~ o ~ ~ o ~ =r
H _ a~ ~1 _ ~ _ _ O~
~ o =r u~ o oc
H ~ ~ O
. ~ O O O O O O O O
~ ~ ~ ~r rl ~ rl ~ ~ '~
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ a~ ~ ~
Z '~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ L'~ '~ ~1 0~1 V~ 0~
