Language selection

Search

Patent 1140226 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1140226
(21) Application Number: 317286
(54) English Title: CORE LAMINATION FOR SHELL-TYPE CORES, PARTICULARLY FOR TRANSFORMERS
(54) French Title: TOLES DE NOYAU DU TYPE COQUILLE, POUR TRANSFORMATEURS PARTICULIEREMENT
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 336/75
  • 336/78
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H01F 27/24 (2006.01)
  • H01F 27/245 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PHILBERTH, KARL (Canada)
  • PHILBERTH, BERNHARD (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • PHILBERTH, KARL (Not Available)
  • PHILBERTH, BERNHARD (Not Available)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1983-01-25
(22) Filed Date: 1978-12-04
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
P 27 55 218.7 Germany 1977-12-10

Abstracts

English Abstract


Abstract of the Disclosure
Core laminations of two piece EI construction for shell-
type cores comprising an E part providing three legs 1,2,3
and a yoke 5, and an I part providing a yoke 4, the width
c1 of the yoke 5 being greater than the width c2 of the
yoke 4, the width b of the outer legs is greater than half
the width f of the middle leg, and the sum C1 + c2 is
greater than f. In the stacked core the E and I parts
may be in respective stacks, or alternate layers may be
reversed. The laminations may be secured by cementing,
welding or clamping. The arrangement permits nearly
wasteless stamping and improved electrical and magnetic
characteristics.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



The embodiments the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1) Core laminations of two piece EI configuration comp-
rising an E part and an I part, two said I parts being
obtained from the window stampings of two E parts stamped
simultaneously with the legs pointing toward one another,
providing three legs and two end yokes and suitable for
shell-type magnetic cores, particularly for transformers
utilizing a plurality of said laminations provided in layers,
the E part having a center leg and two outer legs parallel
thereto at a distance and an integral yoke, which will be
called the integral yoke, and the ends of said legs abutting
one side of the I part constituting the other yoke, which
will be called the separated yoke, characterized in that the
width (c1) of said integral yoke is greater than the width
(c2) of said separated yoke (c1 > c2) and greater than half
the center leg width (c1 > f/2) and the width (b) of the two
outer legs is greater than half the center leg width (b>f/2).

2) Core laminations of two piece EI configuration comp-
rising an E part and I part, windows being provided for the
insertion of a coil-form and winding, providing three legs
and two end yokes and suitable for shell-type magnetic cores,
particularly for transformers utilizing a plurality of said
laminations provided in alternatingly reversed layers, the E
part having a center leg and two outer legs parallel thereto
at a distance and an integral yoke, which will be called the
integral yoke and which is provided with inside edges facing
said windows, and the ends of said legs forming abutting




joints with one side of the I part constituting the other
yoke, which will be called the separated yoke and which is
provided with inside edges facing said windows, characterized
in that the width (c1) of said integral yoke is greater than
the width (c2) of said separated yoke (c1 > c2) and greater
than half the center leg width (c1 > f/2) and the width
(b) of the two outer legs is greater than half the center
leg width (b > f/2) and wherein in said laminations provided
in alternately reversed layers, said inside edges of said
separated yoke being spaced away from said coil-form and
winding in contrast to said inside edges of said integral
yoke, with the inside edges of said separated yoke spaced
away from said inside edges of said integral yoke and said
integral yoke inner edges nearer the coil-form and winding
than said inside edges of said separated yoke and said
abutting joints are located inside the yokes of said shell-
type core.
3) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 characterized
in that the sum of the widths (c1 + c2) of the yokes is
at least 1.3 times and maximum 1.4 times the center leg
width (f).
4) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or claim 3 charac-
terized in that the outer legs width (b) is at least 1.2
times and maximum 1.3 times half the center leg width (f/2).
5) Core laminations as defined in claim 2 characterized
in that the outer legs width (b) is at least 1.2 times and
maximum 1.3 times half the center leg width (f/2).



6) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5
characterized in that the width (c1) of the integral yoke
is at least 5% greater than the width (c2) of the separated
yoke.
7) Core laminations as defined in claim1 or 2 or 5 char-
acterized in that the width of the integral yoke (c1) is
at least 10% greater than the width of the separated yoke(c2).
8) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5 charac-
terized in that the width of the integral yoke (c1) is at
least 20% greater than the width (c2) of the separated yoke.
9) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5 charac-
terized in that the distance (h) between each outer leg and
the center leg is equal to the width (c2) of the I part (B).
10) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5 charac-
terized in that the distance (h) between each outer leg and
the center leg is greater than the width (c2) of the
I part (b) (h > c2).
11) Core laminations as defined in claim 2 or 5 characterized
in that the waste during stamping amounts to no more than twice,
the length (e)of the windows minus the length (a) of the
I part (B) of the separated yoke.
12) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5 charac-
terized in that the width (c2) of the separated yoke is
greater than half the center leg width (f/2).
13) Core laminations as defined in claim 1 or 2 or 5 charac-
terized in that the width (c2) of the separated yoke is at
least half the center leg width (f/2).
14) Core laminations as defined in claim 2 or 5 characterized
in that a plurality of said layers of core laminations are
interleaved in an alternatingly opposite direction so that
the inside length (eK) of the windows is shorter, by the
difference of the yoke widths (c1 - c2) than the length (e)
of the windows of the individual core laminations.



Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


114~Z26

Core Lamination for Shell~type cores,
particularly for Transformers.
__.__ _
The invention relates to imp~ovements in magnetic
core laminations of two piece EI configuration providing
three legs and two end yokes, for shell type magnetic cores
utilizing a plurality of said EI laminations provided in
layers, said layers being provided with an E
and an I part, the E parts having a center leg and two
outer legs parallel thereto at a distance and an integral
yoke, which will be called the integral yoke and the ends
of said legs abut one side of the I parts, constituting
the other yoke, which will be called the separated yoke,
and wherein lower reluctance, reduced magnetic leakage and
higher efficiency is achieved by means which are described
hereafter.
Namely, in addition to the so-called M type of core
laminations for shell-type cores, there is also another
very widely used type, namely the so-called EI core
lamination, for instance according to US-Patent 3,546,571;
~th December 1970; USA Fletcher et al. Core laminations
o~ the EI type are distinguished in particular by very
economical manuacture because they can be stamped with
litt'le or no waste at al], and I parts being obtained from
the waste left after the E parts have been stamped.
By far the greatest majority of known art magnetic
core laminations for shell-type cores of two piece EI
construction are provided with a ratio of the center leg
width being twice the width of'each outer leg and also
twice the width of each of th~ end yokes which are of the
same width as the outer legs, that is half the center leg
width.
It is the object of the invention to provide new
and improved magnetic core laminations of two piece EI
construction, so that a core comprising such lam;nations
will be characterised by lower reluctance, reduced maynetic
leakage and higher efficiency.
According to the invention this object is achieved
by ~roviding a core laminations comprising an E


11~()226

pa,rt .~nd ,3,n :I: p3rt;, . r,a.rts and I
parts b-^in~r,~orned hy ,i.-~u].tareous stampin-,-to minimize
~aste9 ~rovidin, t'n-~e l,e rS end t~ o end -~rokDs and quita.bl.D
for ,hell-typa m.~,net~c coresf -~arti,cularly for transformer--"
the -~ rt havin-~, a Crnter 1 ~? r and tl~,o outer le rS ~arallel
t,hereto at ~1 di.,tance ~nd an interra.l yoke, ~hich ;~7ilL be
called the interral ~Joke, .r.d the ends o.f .-,aid le-rs a.butti,n r
one side of the '~ par-t con.,ti,tutinr~ the other ~olce9 whi.ch
.~;ill be called the ~se~r,ltrd ~olA~e~ characterised in that
the width (cl) o.f saicl inte,rral yoke i.s rreater tha.n the
~ridth (c2) of said se~arated yokr, (cl ~c2) and -rreater -than
half the center ler~idth (cl~f'/2) and the width (b) of
the two outer le rs i5 ~,reater than half the center le r I~Jidth
(b ~f~2).
I~oreover, these rneasures not only suppl~y an
advantageous .,olution -to the ,iven prob]em, but also provide
core laminations of ~uite reneral, applicati.on. ~tacked
alternately, these core la.minations yield transformers
o.f much improved marnetic and electrical characteri,tics;
and stacked in the same direction, they can be used to
advantaTe to make weldecl cores, cemented cores or clamped
cores. rhis a;~r)lies particularly to EI laminations ~hen
the width of the inte,.rral yol,ce is rreater than half the cent~r
l,e r ~idth9 preferabl~ hen the su~n of the ~idths of the two
yokes is at least 1.3 times, maximlm l.L~ times the center
le-~ idth and the outer le~ idth is at least 1.2 ti.mes7
maxi.mum 1.3 times hal:f the cen~er le~ idth. ,,~ 5,'' increase
o:f the width o:f the i,nte,-r,ral yoke with refererce to the width
of the se~arated yoke yields fair resul,ts, a 1~-,.,~ increase
yields -,ood results, a 2'~ i,ncrease yields exce1,lent results.
.~n embodiment of the invention is re~resert~d
d;.~r,rlmm,~t;.~,~.l.'.~r ir. t,he dra~in^r, in ~Ihich:
'~ir,. 1 is the ~lan vi.el,~/ of one laver of '.~:;l core laminations~
~; r,. 2 i 5 the plan vie~ of a ,,hell-t,r~e core cons;,stin~ of
,ernatel-y staclce,d El core lamin-ltions.
i~i r,. 3 sho~s the sheJ.l- t~Tl~e core accordin-r, to ~ r,~ ~
J..ockin-r".n the direction of arrow III in ?i-~r. 2.
rhe embodir1ent accordin, to ~i-r,. 1 sholJs a layer of
,o-cal] ed r core 1,~ i.nat,i.ons f~riron cores ln shell.-t~ P
~,ran:,:rormers or thP li'.~.e con~,i.C,tinr of an ~' ~art ,A, l~`.'hi.Ch




..1 _

114(~226

has a yoke 5, a center leg 1 and two outer legs 2 and 3
width of the yoke ~ which forms t-he I part B. This means
that the window widt'n h is e~ual to or greater than the
width c2 of the I part B because this is the only
possibility of obtaining the I parts B from tne window parts
stamped out of the E parts A and hence of cutting the
stamping waste to a minimum. Two E parts A are stamped
simu]taneously, with their legs pointing toward one another,
so that the two window stampings, i.e. the two I parts B,
will be of the necessary length. Thus the waste amounts to
no more than twice the window length e minus the length a
of the I part B of the free yoke 4.
The integral yo~e 5 of the E part A holds the legs
1, ~ and 3 together, its width cl being greater than the
width c2 of the separated yoke 4, i.e. the I part B.
The width of the two outer legs 2 and 3 and of the
two yokes 4 and 5 is greater than half the width f/2 of
the center leg 1. The width b of the outer legs 2 and 3
is preferably 1.2 to 1.3 times half the width f/2 of the
center leg 1 whereas the sum of the widths cl and c2 of
the two yokes 4 and 5 amounts to 1.3 to 1.4 times the
width f of the center leg 1.
The center leg 1, the two outer legs 2 and 3 and
the two yokes 4 and 5 enclose the windows 10 and 11, being
of window length e calculated in the direction of the
longitudinal axis 9 of the center leg 1.
The windows 10 and 11 are asynunetrical to the
transverse axis 6 because the width c1 of the integral
yoke S is greater than the width c2 of the separated yoke
4, i.e. the I part B.-
The shell-type core according to Fig. 2 and 3
contains core ]aminations according to Fig. 1, said core
laminations being stacked alternately. The inside edges
12 of the integral yoke 5 of the E parts A are in contact
with the winding and its supporting coil form respectively.
Said winding and coil form are not shown in the drawings.
In contrast, the inside edges 15 of the separated yoke 4,
i.e. the I parts B are spaced away from the winding and

--3--

226

its coil form respectively; by an amount corresponding to
tlle yoke width dirference cl - c2. The inside length eK
of the windows in the shell-type core is shorter, by the
yoke width difference cl - c2, than the length e of the
windows 10 and 11 of the individual core laminations. This
form of stacking the core laminations serves to modify the
poor, separated yoke cross-section in favour of the
heneficial, integral yoke cross-section, without any
substantial disadvantage having to be taken into account.
There is no change in the amount of material, stacking
time, yoke cross-section or coil form.
In a core comprising ~ alternately stacked
laminations of the above kind, the abutting joints are
located within the yokes so that some of the magnetic flux
can flow out of the yoke in an undivided stream before it
even reaches the abutting joints, so diminishing the
adverse influence due to said joints. This influence is
diminished still further by making the outer legs wider
than half the center leg.
It is also possible to stack the EI laminations of
the invention in the same direction in the core, the E
parts A and I parts B then being cemented, clamped or
welded together after the insertion of the winding and its
supporting coil form, respectively. This procedure is
particularly adopted in cases where the benefits to the
manufacturing process have priority over the electrical
characteristics. ~lere again, advantages are obtained by
using the core laminations according to the invention.
The magnetic leakage of a shell-type core constructed thus
is very low at the end with the integral yokes, firstly
because the latter is of larger cross-section and hence of
lower reluctance and secondly because all the abutting
joints are situated at the other end in the separated yoke
part of the shell-type core.
The invention thus provides magnetic core laminations
cornprising of two piece EI configuration, wllich are of
really universal application, which according to the
invention, will be suitable for practically all purposes.

_ ,~_

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1140226 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1983-01-25
(22) Filed 1978-12-04
(45) Issued 1983-01-25
Expired 2000-01-25

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1978-12-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
PHILBERTH, KARL
PHILBERTH, BERNHARD
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-01-05 1 22
Claims 1994-01-05 3 117
Abstract 1994-01-05 1 16
Cover Page 1994-01-05 1 12
Description 1994-01-05 4 206