Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~8~41
ELECTRON BEAM-SWITCHED DISCHARGE
FOR RAPIDLY PULSED LASE~S
Field of Invention
This invention relates to electron beam and electrical
discharge systems for repetitively pulsed lasers.
Background of the Invention
Pulsed lasers that operate in the visible and ultra-
violet region of the spectrum have potential applications in
the areas of laser isotope separation and photochemistry. The
rare gas ha]ide (RGH) and rare gas excimer (RGE) lasers and the
mercury halide lasers are examples of such lasers. Some of
these applications require lasers that operate at high repeti-
tion rates with short pulses and modest energies per pulse.
Typical parameters for such applications are energies of
0.1-1.0 Joules per pulse at repetition rates between 1 and 10
kHz, with pulse durations of 20-100 nsec. The combinations of
these parameters corresponding to average power outputs of
0.1-1 kW is desirable. Lasers with suitable pulse widths and
single pulse energies have been demonstrated, but they pr~s-
ently operate at relatively low pulse repetition rates and lowaverage powers. These lasers are presently limited by gas heat-
ing and acoustic effects and by inadequate power conditioning
systems. Higher average powers may be obtained by an increase
in pulse repetition rate through application of convective flow
for gas cooling, acoustic damping, and improved power condition-
ing techniques. The economic operation of RGH lasers at high
repetition rates and high average powers is dependent upon the
reliability and cost of the power conditioning system. This
patent specification describes a technique for discharge laser
excitation that leads to an improvement in electrical power
conditioning at high repetition rates for pulsed lasers in
general and RGH lasers in particular.
Pulsed RGH lasers have been excited using any of three
techniques: direct electron beam excitation, electron beam-
sustainer excitation and fast pulse electrical discharge.
These techniques have also been used to excite a variety of
other lasers tCO, CO2, Xe2, N2, etc.), and an extensive
literature is available describing such excitations. General
a~pects of the electron beam and electron beam-sustainer
, 7, .
~82~
approaches are discussed in U.S. Patent No. 3,641,454 to
B. Krawetz. J. Daugherty et al, in ApPlied Physics Letters,
Vol. 28, p. 581 (1976) discusses the electron beam-sustainer
approach for CO2 lasers; and beam-sustainer excitation of the
Xe2 laser is described by E. Huber, et al, in I.E.E.E. Journal
of Quantum Electronics, Vol. QE-12, p. 353 (1976).
Electron beam excitation of RGH lasers was first dis-
cussed by Searles and Hart in Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 27,
p. 243 (1975) and by Ewing and Brau in Physical Review A,
Vol. 12, p. 12 (1975). Mangano et al, in Applied Physics
Letters, Vol. 27, p. 495 (1975) and Vol. 28, p. 724 (1976), and
Vol. 29, p. 426 (197~) have described RGH laser e~citation by
electron beam-controlled discharge pumping, and fast pulse dis-
charge excitation of RGH lasers was first discussed by Burnham
et al, in Applied Ph~sics Letters, Vol. 29, p. 86 (1976).
Nighan, in I.E.E.E. Jour. of Quantum Electronics, Vol. QE-14,
p. 714 (1978), reviews the area of electron beam-controlled RGH
lasers.
These several approaches have both advantages and
disadvantages in operation at high repetition rates. In the
direct electron beam technique, laser excitation is produced by
passage of a high voltage electron beam through a thin metal
foil and through the gas, with the electron beam producing
ionization that ultimately results in laser excitation. The
electron beam is the only source of energy for the discharge,
and the electron beam current density must be relatively high
to provide sufficient power deposition to e~cite the laser.
Electron beam current densities greater than 10 A/cm2 at vol-
tages of a few hundred kilovolts are typically required for
excitation of RGH lasers at a pressure of a few atmospheres,
from the fcllowing considerations. Laser medium gain of
.01-.05/cm requires power deposition of
E = 5-10 kW/cm
where iS the laser efficiency; and for ~ = 0.1 (characteristic
of RGH lasers), E~ = 50-100 kW/cm3 requires a current den-
sity 3b ~ 10 A/cm .
Electron current densitie~ of this magnitude are
customarily otained with cold cathode electrode guns. Each
emitting surface o the cathode is pulse charged to a voltage
of the order of 300 keV, and electrons are emitted from a
8~41
plasma that subsequently forms near the cathode surface. Foil
heating is a major limitation on maximum pulse repetition fre-
quency for a pure e-beam excited medium, as a representative
e-beam electron may deposit a significant amount of its kinetic
energy in the foil before entering the gas volume. Once the
beam enters the target gas volume, the beam loses about 30 eV
in producing an ion, and each ion has the potential to produce
a 5 eV laser photon upon electron/ion combination; this repre-
sents a six-fold loss in efficiency. Further losses in effi-
ciency occur by virtue of the tendency of noble gases, molecularhalides and certain ions (Ar2, F , etc.) produced by the
discharge to absorb radiation throughout the ultraviolet.
Electrons may also scatter out of the useful volume. The
result is that overall efficiencies of about 6~ are possible
for RGH lasers pumped by electrons beams; self-absorption in
RGE lasers limits the overall efficiency to ~ 1%.
The use of the electron beam excitation technique for
high repetition rate lasers is limited by heating of the foil
window, intrinsic to this technique, since all the power input
to the discharge is supplied by the electron beam. With in-
creasing repetition rate and current density, the mean tempera-
ture of the foil increases. With present foil materials and
foil cooling techniques, the average beam current density is
limited to less than approximately 1 mA/cm2. For a duty
cycle of 0.1%, typical for some applications of short pulse
lasers, the peak current density is thereby limited by foil
heating to less than approximately 1 A/cm2 under conditions
suitable for efficient, high pulse repetition rate operation,
which is insufficient to excite a RGH laser directly.
The electron beam current density required for laser
excitation can be reduced by the use of electron beam-sustainer
techniques, whereby a small, steady voltage below the breakdown
voltage is applied across a pair of electrodes immersed in the
same gas that is excited by the electron beam. Additional
power input to the discharge is obtained from this sustainer
electric field, but the sustainer current density required is
apparently JB ~ 2 amp/cm2 (Huber, supra). For the same
power depos;tion in the gas, the electron beam power input can
be reduced accordingly as the sustaîner contribution increases.
However, the electron beam power input cannot be reduced to an
arbitrarily low value. Power input from the sustainer field
~B2~
increases with the applied electric field, but there is a ma~i-
mum electric field that can be applied without the onset on
ionization instabilities in the laser gas. Further, the power
transfer from the sustainer field is itself determined by the
electrical characteristics of the discharge produced in the
laser gas by the electron beam. For RGH lasers, the electrons
produced by the electron beam are rapidly removed by dissocia-
tive attachment to the halide component of the laser gas, and
the electrical conductivity of the discharge is reduced propor-
tionately. Thus, in RGH lasers, a relatively high electronbeam current density is required to provide sufficient conduc-
tivity to allow adequate power transfer from the sustainer
field. In a slightly different approach, sometimes referred to
as the electron beam-controlled discharge, the electron density
is allowed to grow by avalanche ionization from an initial
value determined by the electron beam. The degree of enhance-
ment that can be obtained over that of the electron beam alone
is limited by the onset of an instability in the laser medium,
leading to a constrictive arc. The reduction in electron beam
current density by both these techniques is not sufficient to
allow operation at high repetition rates within the limits
imposed by the electron beam foil.
Simple electrical discharges are also often used to
excite RGH lasers. Such discharges can produce single pulse
energies of the order of one Joule and pulse lengths of 10-lO0
nsec, with overall efficiencies of the order of 1%.
Three methods of establishment of diffuse large area
electrical discharges are available in the pr;or art for laser
excitation. The first method uses many individually excited
electrodes producing many independent small discharges in
parallel. This method is typically inefficient in coupling
electrical energy to the discharge and produces a markedly
non-uniform spatial discharge. The second method uses a
pre-ionization source such as a spark that is fired before the
main discharge voltage is applied to the gas; this source pro-
duces a small density of free electrons in the gas. A main
discharge voltage pulse with a fast rise rate is then applied
between two large electrodes; and if the voltage pulse rise
rate is sufficiently high, a diffuse and reasonably uniform
discharge can be established and maintained for a short time
between the electrodes. However, an undesirable collapse to a
41
constricted arc-type discharge will follow in a few micro-
seconds or less, if the discharge is at useful levels. If the
voltage pulse rise rate is too low, a diffuse discharge does
not form, and the charge flow develops in constricted channels
from the beginning. The peak applied voltage for this approach
must exceed the static breakdown voltage for the discharge.
A third discharge method uses an e-beam sustained
electrical discharge, where the external source o~ ionization
(the e-beam) remains on during the entire pulse. The electron
beam controls the power input to the laser gas. Power is de-
posited in the gas ~y while the electron beam is applied, in
contrast to the present invention where the electron beam is
used merely to initiate the process. The ionization produced
by this source using the sustainer method is much more intense
than the pre-ionization intensity used in the uv preionization
method above, and is in fact so intense that it is the dominant
and controlling ionization source during the entire discharge
pulse. The discharge voltage need not be high enough to pro-
duce sufficient ionization in the gas to sustain the discharge
by itself. Externally sustained discharges such as these can
typicall~ be made spatiall~ more uniform and for longer times
and at higher pressures than the simpler self-sustained dis-
charges. Only a modest fraction of the electrical excitation
need be delivered by ver~ high energy electrons passing through
a foil so that maximum pulse repetition frequencies are poten-
tially higher than for pure e-beam pumped devices. However,
where a RGH laser is used, the e-beam must still supply 0.2-0.4
of the excitation energy to maintain discharge stability so
that the advantages of this technique are not as great as for
certain other lasers. For the 10.~ ~m CO2 laser, for example,
the required e-beam excitation can be less than 0.1 of the
total excitation energy supplied.
The techniques used to generate high current density,
short pulse, electron beams are not suitable for operation at
high pulse repe~ition rates. The electron beam is generated by
application of a pulsed high voltage to a cathode, and the
electron emission processes tend to destroy the cathode surEace
and to modify the cathode electrical characteristics. In addi-
tion, the generation of high voltage pulses requires switches
capable of long life operation at high voltage and high average
power. Such switches are not presently available. Substantial
improvement in system performance could be made if the electron
4~
beam requirements for laser excitation are reduced. Several
techniques exist for electron beam generation at lower current
densities, techniques which may also allow high pulse repeti-
tion rate operation. Gridded hot cathode systems and wire-
plasma electron guns are two such systems.
It is an object of the invention to provide an elec-
trical discharge method for exciting an optical gain medium
that allows high repetition rates, small initiating current
densities and increased lifetimes for electrical switching
apparatus
Another object is to improve electrical discharge
laser operation by reducing the peak power required to be
supplied by the associa~ed electrical circuits in exciting the
laser.
Another object is to reduce the required electron beam
intensity for laser operation.
Another object is to stabilize the electrical dis-
charge at high peak powers by use of a low inductance primary
power source.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will
become clear by reference to the drawings and detailed descrip-
tion.
Summary of the Invention
The subject invention (hereinafter called the switched
discharge method) a method and apparatus for producing an elec-
trical discharge for laser excitation that operates in a param-
eter regime Aif~ering from methods used in the prior art and
greatly eases the engineering problems associated with switch-
ing in RG~ and RGE lasers. The method comprises the steps of
providing a rare gas and halogen gas mixture, having an asso-
ciated self breakdown voltage Vdc, in a discharge volume
having an electrode gap of at least 1 cm; applying a pulsed
electric field across the discharge volume over a time inter-
val ~t, with the associated electric field voltage lying above
Vdc but below the "transient pulse breakdown voltage" V~t,
defined as the voltage required to cause breakdown upon appli-
cation for a time interval ~t (here, a few microseconds;
~ tl ~t2 ~dc if ~tl ~ ~t2); providing a
screen electrode to admit energetic electrons into the dis-
charge volume; and providing an electron beam pulse that passes
~82~
through the discharge volume, with the e-beam having an inten-
sity sufficient to initiate electrical discharge across the
discharge volume. The voltage is increased to a value V <
V~t over a relatively long interval (~t > ~sec) so that
switch lifetimes are prolonged to perhaps 10 cycles.
This method and apparatus produces a self-sustained
discharge but uses a short, externally produced e-beam pulse to
ionize and switch the gas from a nonconducting to a conducting
state. The external (e-beam) ionization source only provides
an initiating event; it does not dominate over or control the
subsequent current ~low as is the case for a conventional
e-beam sustained discharge. After application of the switching
pulse in the subject invention, the discharge develops substan-
tially as in a pre-ionization discharge. The main discharge
voltage V < V~ is applied before the switching pulse and is
t
usually higher than the static breakdown voltage Vdc of a
conventional discharge.
There are several unexpected and significant benefits
arising out of this invention. The method and apparatus allows
an increase in switch lifetimes by 2-3 orders of magnitude, to
cycles, by lengthening the time for voltage buildup to
intervals of 1 microsecond or more and by decreasing the re-
quired electron beam current density to as low as 0.1 amps/cm2.
This e-beam current density is about two orders of magnitude
lower than that required for conventional e-beam sustained dis-
charges. This invention allows operation of the switched dis-
charge in new parameter regimes and using gases (such as pure
argon at substantially atmospheric pressure) that are inoper-
able with prior art approaches. The method of this invention
utilizes discharge voltage maximums that are below the magni-
tude required to initiate discharge over the associated time
period (1 microsecond or more) in a prior art device. This
invention allows for use of high reliability, high repetition
rate and low cost pwer supplies with rare gas halogen~lasers.
Such systems with high reliability, repetition rate and low
cost have heen herebefore unobtainable.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is an energy storage/discharge circuit used
in the prior art.
--7--
~82~
Figure 2 is one embodiment of an energy storage/
discharge network used in the subject invention.
Figure 3 is a schematic view of one embodiment o~ the
sub~ect invention.
Figure ~ is a graphic representation of the parameter
regimes (electric field vs electron beam current density) use-
ful in aifferent prior art approaches and for the sub~ect
invention.
Figure 5 is a graphic representation of increase in
the imposed electric field in the discharge volume, as a func-
tion of time, for the subject invention.
Figure 6 is a graphic representation of electron beam
current density (Jb) and e-beam-switched discharge current
density (Jd)' as a function of time, for the subject inven-
tion.
Figure 7 is a graphic representation of free electron
density, as a function of time and with various ramped electric
fields (~r)' for the subject invention.
Figures 8 and 9 are graphic representations of time
delay (~td) for pulse discharge as a function of operating
pressure (P) in the discharge volume, for argon and helium
buffer gases, respectively.
Figure 10 is a graphic representation of KrF laser
energy output (EL in millijoules), as a function of operating
pressure for differing percentages of F2 in an argon-buffered
medium.
Figure ll is a graphic representation of discharge
current density versus time for a cGnventional electron beam
controlled discharge method of excitation of a rare gas halid
3~ laser.
Figure 12 is a graphic representation of power enhance-
ment factor (EF), electrical power density (P), small signal
gain (gO) and rare gas halide excimer production efficiency
( ) ~or a conventional electron beam controlled discharge
method o~ excitation of a rare gas halide laser such as KrF.
Detailed Description
The rare gas halide IRG~) laser can potentially pro-
vide high average power in the ultraviolet region of the spec-
trum. Presently available RG~ lasers operate at low pulse
repetition fre~uencies and low average power output. Operation
--8--
z~
at high pulse repetition frequencies and/or high average power
operation is desirable for applications such as laser isotope
separation, but such operation is presently limited by switch-
ing requirements.
As noted above, three different approaches using
electron beams and/or discharges are available to excite RGH
lasers: (1) direct electron beam excitation; (2) electron
beam-controlled electrical discharges and electron beam-
sustainer excitation; and (3) fast pulse electrical discharge.
The techniques differ in the manner in which the primary and/or
secondary power is applied to the laser gas volume.
The subject invention, the switched discharge method,
utili~es a self-sustained discharge that is initiated by a
short pulse from an intense external source of ionization to
switch the target gas from a nonconducting to a conducting
state.
The utility of the switched discharge method arises
from certain specific characteristics of RGH laser discharges.
If one operates these discharges according to the pre-ionization
discharge method, optimum output is obtained when the main
discharge voltage across the device rises rapidly to a value
several times the static operating or d.c~ breakdown voltage,
in a time of 100 nsec or less. Longer voltage risetimes result
in discharges of very poor quality. In addition, the optimum
discharges maintain a quality suitable for lase~ operation for
very short times, typically only about 20-40 nsec for a device
with a 2.5 cm discnarge gap. These fea~ures introduce signifi-
cant engineering problems in prior art devices such as shown in
Figure 1, ~7hich shows a typical discharge circuit. The RGH
lasers require a discharge current of some tens of kiloamperes
at an operating voltage of a few kilovolts, for typical dis-
charge lengths of 50-100 cm. The inductance Ll of the loop
in Figure 1 must be kept as small as possible to transfer large
energies from Cl to the discharge in 20-40 nsec. Unavoidable
use of high inductance loops appears to be endemic in the prior
art techniques for electron beam-driven laser medium excita-
tion; and the use of low inductanre loops is another distin-
guishing feature of the present invention. The switch and the
connections to it must therefore have extremely low inductance,
and this presents a serious design problem, particularly for
operation at high average power performance. Typically, many
parallel switches, either spark gaps or thyratrons, are
re~uired to keep the loop inductance 11 within acceptable
limits. The loop current can be increased by raising the vol-
tage on Cl; but operation at a high impedance Z = J-L1jC
reduces the fraction of the energy stored in the capacitor Cl
that is coupled into the discharge during the period of stable
operation, thus affecting efficiency and also undesirably
depositing the excess energy in various parts of the deYice at
later times. A further disadvantage of the prior art approach
is that the fast current pulse used must pass through a switch,
with switch lifetime decreasing sharply with increasing peak
power.
Figure 2 shows an approach, used in the subject lnven-
tion, that ameliorates many of these difficulties. A primary
storage capacitor C2 is coupled as closely as physically
possible to the laser discharge so that L2 is as small as
practical. This intermediate storage capacitor C2 is then
charged from the secondary storage capacitor C3 through a
switch so that the voltage on C2 rises in a time interval
that is less than the 50 nsec rise time that the laser dis-
charge will tolerate. The switch need not manifest such ~owinductance as in Figure 1. The fast current pulse that excites
the laser discharge does not pass through any switch.
Consider now the circuit of Figure 2, operated as part
of the switched discharge method. The inductance L2 must
still be kept as small as practical to couple the maximum
amount o energ~ to the discharge in 20-40 nsec. However, the
transfer from the primary energy storage capacitor C3 to the
intermediate storage capacitor C2 is extended over a much
longer time (nominally, a few microseconds), which greatly
relieves the design problems with the switch and the inductance
L3 and makes it possible, for example, to use a single thyra-
tron of modest size as the switch. The intermediate storage
capacitor C2 is charged to a voltage higher than the static
breakdown voltage of the discharge, but less than the transient
breakdown voltage for microsecond pulser VQt.
Switched discharge operation has not been important in
the past ~or CO2 lasers; these lasers can tolerate much
longer discharge pulses (on the order of microseconds) and do
not present as serious a switch design problem as RGH lasers
with pulse durations in the tens of nanoseconds.
Excitation of R~H lasers by the e-beam-controlled dis-
charge has been demonstrated in the teachings of Huber and of
--10--
4~
Krawetz, supra, but has serious limitations. The external
source of ionization must provide a significant fraction of tbe
energy deposited per unit volume in the laser discharge, in
order to control these particular gas mixtures. These exter-
nally sustained discharges in RGH gas mixtures must also operate
at smaller energy density than self-sustained discharges, in
order to maintain stability. Very low energy density is unde-
sirable in a repetitively pulsed system cooled by convection
since much more gas must flow through the system. Externally
sustained discharges have, however, maintained good discharge
quality for perhaps half a microsecond, in contrast to the
20-40 nsec discharge pulse achieved with prior art discharge
methods.
The subject invention avoids the above-mentioned limi-
tations and provides capability for operation at high pulse
rates and high average power by an amalgamation, using features
of each of the above techniques to allow operation in new
physical parameter regimes affording improved performance of
the electrical power conditioning system. With reference to
Figure 3, a laser gas volume 11 is positioned between a pair of
laser discharge electrodes 13a and 13b, similar to those used
by the conventional discharge laser. These electrodes may be
solid or porous, as appropriate. The laser gas may be station-
ary in the volume 11. Alternatively, a gas flow 15 may be pro-
vided, preferably moving transversely to the long axis AA of
the discharge, to provide convective cooling of the gas in the
volume 11 and of the electron beam foil 21. The primary storage
capacitor at 17 is charged to a voltage above station DC break-
down voltage and below the transient pulse breakdown voltage
V~t of the particular gas mixture used, by a switched power
supply 18 having a transfer time that is long compared to dis-
charge dura~ion; a thyratron switch or array of such switches
are appropriate here for the switched power supply 1~.
An electron beam source, having a cathode 19, a timing
control grid 20 and an anode foil 21, is positioned as shown so
that an e-beam pulse may be applied to the gas volume 11 through
the screen electrode 13b. The e-beam timing and control means
intensity is below the average pow~r limits on the foil ~1
(less than about 1 A/cm2 for 100 nsec pulses at 10 KHz) but
is somewhat above the intensity required for preionization of a
conventional discharge laser (i.e., greater than about 0.05
A/cm2). ~nder these conditions the discharge will switch
into a low impedance mode under the influence of the electron
beam and dissipate the energy stored in the capacitor 17 across
the discharge volume 11, in a manner suitable for RGH laser
excitation. The majority of the power input comes from the
discharge circuit rather than from the electron beam, but the
electron beam must be capable of operation at the desired pulse
repetition frequencies (~ lO KHz).
The pressure of the gas volume 11 in one embodiment is
approximately 700 torr, mostly He or Ar plus 100 torr of Kr
plus 3 torr of F2 for a KrF laser; In such a gas, self break-
down occurs with a static field as low as 10 KV/cm and V~t is
~ 20 KV/cm. For the 2.5 cm electrode gap contemplated here,
the voltage would be kept below, say, 50 KV (20 KV/cm). Elec-
trode gap spacing is 2.25 cm, and the voltage reaches 40 KV at
the time the electron beam is applied. Representative param-
eters for the electron beam are: e beam energy and pulse width,
250 KeV and 100 nsec, respectively; the e beam exits through a
l-mil thick aluminized Mylar foil at a resulting current den-
sity of 0.25 amps/cm2; and e beam current rise time was 50
nsec. The laser cavity was comprised of a 100% reflector and a
70% output coupler, each having a 5M radius of curvature, with
mirror separation 0.8M. The laser cell was closed with
Bre~ster windows of CaF2, with resulting path length 0.6M.
Maximum output of the ~ - 2490 A light was 150 millijoules,
with laser pulse width 20-25 nsec, although recent improvements
have increased this to 600 millijoule output.
Figure ~ indicates schematically the different regions
o~ operation of some of the known laser gas electrical excita-
tion techniques. The uv preionized discharge method requires
application of a large elec~ric field, generally 20-40 KV/cm to
a medium that is already partially preionized or preconditioned
by a weak, external pulse of radiation such as might be supplied
by a uv source or a low intensity electron beam source (Jb =
0.1-1.0 milliamps/cm2). With this approach, the time interval
Tp for preionizing the gas is relatively long (~p ~ lO
~sec) and the period ~s available for switching in the high
electric field is relatively short (TS ~100 nsec). This
stresses the switch and usually produces a short associated
switch lifetime (< 106 pulses).
At the other end of the spectrum, one has the e-beam
or e-beam plus sustainer approach, allowing use of modest elec-
tric field strength, say E ~2 ~V/cm, but requiring large cur-
rent densities ~Jb ~ lO A/cm2).
Z4~
Figures 5 and 6 exhibit, for comparison purposes, the
temporal behavior of applied voltage, excitation intensity
(pre-ionization/electron beam) and resulting discharge current
for the uv pre-ionization method versus the presently claim~d
electron beam-switched discharge method, respectively. In the
uv preionization discharge approach of the prior art (Figure
5), (1) a preionization source is provided, followed a time
~tl > 100 nsec later by (2~ application of an electric field,
(3) followed by discharge current initiation at time ~td <100
nsec later and then by (4) current peaking after an additional
time ~t3 < 50 nsec. In the switched discharge method, one
begins with (1) application of an electric field, followed a
time Atl = 1-10 ~sec later by (2) application of an electron
beam, followed by (3) discharge current flow beginning at a
time ~td '50 nsec later and then by (4) a peak current after
an additional time ~t3 ~50 nsec. The switched discharge
method allows operation at modest e-beam current densities
(Jb ~ 0.1 A/cm ), applied subsequent to imposition of an
electric field of strength ~ = 10-20 KV/cm. Using relatively
long electric field build-up times of 1-10 ~sec. (Figure 6),
the lifetime of the switch Sl of Figure 2 is extended to an
estimated 108 cycles or greater. In Figure 6, the conductiv-
ity is initially governed by the free electron density ne
produced by the e-beam; but thereafter the discharge is not
controlled by subsequent e-beam intensity.
Figure 7 exhibits the theoretical growth of ne with
time, using the switched discharge, for different ranges of
maximum values of the initial ramped electrical field, sr.
The static breakdown electric field ~b(Jb) for the laser
gas is 10-20 KV/cm for a noble gas/halide gas at a total pres-
sure of about one atmosphere (6800 Pascals) with Jb = 0.25
A/cm . The curve r = corresponds to the sustainer mode
and the curve ' ~r ~ ~b to a recombination-limited curve;
both of these curves exhibit early saturation. Where the
static initial field Er = ~b(Jb)' the recombination
losses and avalanche effects are in approximate balance so that
log (ne) grows linearly with t. For ~r> Sb(Jd), the
avalanche effects may be controlling from the beginning, in
which event log (ne) will grow faster than linearly and
follow a curve ~r; however, if recombination is controlling
initially (for small values of n3), log (ne) may initially
lie below the linear growth curve (~r = ~b(Jd)) and grow
-13-
faster than linearly (curve Sr) only after ne has attained
some threshold value. As yet, it is difficult to determine
whether the quantity log (ne) follows a curve r or follows
a curve ~r above the breakdown field ~b = ~b(Jd).
In Figure 8, the measured dependence of discharge time
delay ~td upon total pressure p of the laser gas (primarily
Ar), for different gas compositions of a gas having an Ar buf-
fer and laser components Kr + F, is shown. One notes that for
Jb = 0~37 A/cm2, the discharge time delay is longest for a
mixture 86.5% Ar ~ 12.5% Xr + 1% F2 and is shortest (for p
950 torr) for a mixture 87.17% Ar, 12.5% Kr and 0.33% F2.
The variation of ~td with ~ F2 present is much smaller
where an He buffer is used, as indicated in Figure 9, but
either buffer may be used with the switched discharge method.
The measure~ laser output EL varies with total gas
pressure p and with gas composition, as indicated in Figure 10
with Jb = 0 37 A/cm2, as well as with many other parameters
such as mirror reflectivities. The total laser output is
apparently only slightly sensitive to the gas composition, but
manifests a well-defined pressure .lependence. The appearance
of the broader maximum for a gas containing 0.33~ F2,
vis-a-vis a gas containing 1% F2, is also characteristic of
the laser output for the uv preionization method; but the uv
preionization method is inoperable with an Ar buffer. Thus the
switched discharge method is operable with at least one gas
mixture (Kr/F/Ar) for which the uv preionization method is
inoperable. Presence of this broader maximum is useful if the
total system pressure is stochastic and not controllable within
a narrow range of pressure; but the optimum pressure corre-
sponding to 1% F2 occurs at a smaller system pressure (p ~
500 torr), and this system requires less energy to recirculate
the (less massive) laser gas than does the system with 0.33%
F2. Within a reasonable range of F2 fraction in the gas,
then, a higher percentage of F2 is preferable if one is con-
cerned primarily with gas recirculation energy expended.
The operation of the switched discharge concept has
been demonstrated, and Figures 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10 are based on
experimental data. The operation conforms to the general con-
cepts presented in this detailed description.
The switched discharge method is operable with He, Ne
or Ar buffers while, as noted above, the uv preionization
method is apparently operable only with He. Sze, in Jour. of
~ppl. Phys. 50, 4596 (1979) has recently reported laser action
in XeCl with He, Ne or Ar as buffer, using an electric ava-
lanche discharge. Sze works only with total gas pressures of
1000-2500 torr, which are 2-5 times as high as the optimal
pressures for the switched discharge method~ Further, laser
energy output using Sze's approach with a neon buffer apparent-
ly increases with increasing pressure, indicating that an opti-
mal pressure, if such exists, occurs only at very high total
pressures. Optimum pressure for He buffering appears to be
about 2300 torr for Sze's approach. For the switched discharge
method, optimum pressure occurs at much lower pressures--for
example, at p= 500 torr for Ar buffering, as shown in Figure
10. Further, Sze's laser apparatus requires current densities
of about 625 amps/cm , delivered over a time interval of
about 30 nsec, as may be inferred from his earlier report in
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 49 772 (1978). A third report, Sze and
Scott, 33 Appl. Phys. Lett. 419 (1978), discusses the difficul-
ties of obtaining laser action in RGH media such as XeCl and
KrCl and concludes that high energy laser response is favored
in electric discharge approaches over electron beam excitation
of the laser medium.
The system used consisted of the general components
shown in Figure 3, with the exception tha~ gas flow was not
included. The laser gas mixture was contained in a Teflon
cell, and metal electrode holder ~lates formed two of the cell
surface~. The electrodes were 30 cm long and approximately 2
cm wide. One electrode was constructed with a 1 cm x 30 cm
slot through which the electron beam entered the active dis-
charge volume, this electrode being covered with a fine mesh
screen. The electrode separation was nominally 2.5 cm. The
electron beam was obtained from a commercial source, and its
nominal characteristics were a beam current of 10 A/cm2 at
250 KV for a duration of 100 nsec. The beam current density
was attenuated prior to entering the active discharge volume by
placing a series of fine mesh screens behind the screened elec-
trode. Beam current densities 250 ma/cm2 were reliably
obtained by this method. The intermediate energy capacitor
C2, was made up of 30 ceramic capacitors arrayed along the
length of the electrode, with the nominal capacitance being 500
Y~/capacitor at 40 KV. The pulse charglng network consisted
of a 0.1 Yf/capacitor (C3 of Figure 3) switched by a triggered
-15-
æ4~
spark gap (Sl). Sufficient inductan~e was added to this cir-
cuit to obtain charging times for C2 of nominally 5 ~sec, and
the primary capacitor, C3, was charged with a dc power supply.
Laser output was used as one measure of performance. The opti-
cal cavity was formed by Brewster window and a pair of mirrors
with nominal reflectivities of 98% and 70%. The gas mixture
was Ar: Kr: F2 ln the ratios 945: 50: 5. In addition to
tests under these nominal conditions variations of conditions
and components were undertaken to establish the range of poten-
tial operation, sensitivities to parameters and conditions ofoptimal performance for this particular configuration. These
variations are listed in Table 1.
As noted above, the switched discharge method allows
laser operation in a gas buffered by He, Ar or Ne, or one of
the higher atomic weight noble gases. Thus, operation of an
RGE laser, using Ar or Kr or Xe, is possible, although this has
not yet been experimentally demonstrated.
Nighan, in his review of electron beam-controlled dis-
charge excitations of RGH lasers, supra, notes that the e beam-
controlled discharge (ebcd) approach appears to allow scalingto higher average power than does the pure e beam approach.
One problem with the conventional abcd approach is that the
electric field-gas-density ratio E/n is limited to values below
1.2 x 10 16 volts/cm2, if one would maintain a stable dis-
charge for periods of the order of 0.5 ~sec or longer. This is
shown graphically in Figure 11, herein, which reproduces
Nighan's Figure 19. This limits one to use of rather low mag-
nitude electric fields or high densities, or else instabilities
such as arc and streamer formation occur before all useful
energy can be deposited in the laser ~as. The switched dis-
charge method, by contrast, works with electric fields of about
30 KV/cm and gas densities of about 2 x 1019 cm 3 so that
~/n ~Y 1.510 15, an order of magnitude larger than the ~aximum
practical values available for a conventional ebcd approach.
A second problem with the ebcd approach with RGH
lasers, noted by Nighan, supra, is the relatively small power
enhancement factor EF(= discharge power . e beam power sup-
plied). As indicated in Figure 12 herein, which reproduces
Nighan's Figure 9, for the ebcd approach EF ~ 2-4 in the region
of stable discharge operation. This is disappointingly small
compared to the EF available for infrared molecular lasers (EF
> 1000) and is a direct consequence of the high e beam power
-16-
4~
required to maintain the electron density at a sufficient level
in the presence of the enormous loss of electrons due to
halogen dimer (e.g., F2) dissociative attachmen~. For the
switched discharge method, with V = 30 KV, ZO (gas impedance
at discharge) = 0.5Q , E = 10 KV/cm and Jb = 0.1 amp/cm
one verifies that EF = (V2/Zo)/Jb (~ ddE)~40,000 at the
time of discharge or peak current flow.
The switched discharge method achieves this perform-
ance level by ramping the imposed electric field relatively
slowly (over a period Qt ~ 1 ~sec) to a voltage near to but
below the transient breakdown voltage VAt associated with the
particular laser gas at that pressure. After a time t, a
small e beam current ~Jb = 0.1-1.0 amp/cm2) is applied to
the discharge volume and discharge occurs. Potential instabil-
ity, through arc and streamer formation in the gas, is still
present, but it occurs long after the peak in current density
~ 50 nsec after e beam current application). One thus
achieves enormous values of EF ( ~40,000) with the switched
discharge method by delaying the onset of instability.
Although the preferred embodiments of the invention
have been shown and described, variation and modification may
be introduced without departing from the scope of the invention. - -
-17-
4~
Table 1
Parameter Range of Yariation Results and Comments
1. Charge voltage 0-40 KV Best performance at
highest voltage
2. Beam Current 0.1-10 A/cm2 Laser output under a11
Density conditions
3. Charging time O.l-10~4sec No significant variation
in performance
4. Gas Mixture F2 0-25 Torr Used in various combina-
Kr 0-200 Torr tions for tests or KrF,
Ar 0-1500 Torr ArF, XeF, XeCl lasers.
He 0-1500 Torr Optima for KrF with Ar
Xe O 10 Torr buffer shown in figure 10.
HCl 0-5 Torr Similar optima found for
other laser gases.
5. Beam Current 10-90%~ 50 nsec No significant variation
reset time , 100 nsec
6. Electrode Contour Open mesh screen, No significant variation
0.5 cm gap "Fish
bone" --
7. Electrode Polarity screen - anode No significant variation
cathode
8. Optical Cavity Output reflector Performance as expected
30-70%, for optical cavity
Internal mirrors,
Injection locked
9. Fast transfer Barium tit~nate J optimal,
loop capacitor Cu: glass stripline performance
stripline High good,
inductance mica High inductance high
capacity tends to arc.
-18-
