Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~S2907
1 BACKGROUND OF THE I~VENTION
2 The present invention relates to a method and apparatus
3 for llmiting the propagation of ductile fractures in pipelines used
4 to transport fluids such as natural gases, compressed gas liquids
or liquid-natural gas mixtures under pressure (hereinafter "natural
6 gas fluids"). More particularly, it relates to crack arrestors
7 that may be put in place during fabrication of a pipeline or added
8 to existing pipelines without degrading their quality. The system
9 is particularly useful for long distance pipelines such as a c`on-
ter~plated for the transport of natural gases and hydrocarbons from
11 the Artic.
12 It is known that it is very costly to fabricate and as-
13 semble hlghly crack resistant large diameter pipe suitable for use
14 as pressurized natural gas transmission lines. In any event, it
is not practical to design a pipeline that will under all condi-
16 tions withstand the internal stresses or external shocks that may
17 cause cracks in a pipeline. In addition, it is known that a crack
18 of substantial size in such pipeline will rapidly enlarge such that
19 its ends may propagate along the pipeline for extremely long dis-
tances. These propagating cracks are Or two types: brittle and
21 ductile. Brittle cracks propagate at high veloclties, typically,
22 -1,300-3,000 ft./sec. without much apparent deformation of the pipe-
23 11ne near the crack. The pipeline appears to break open and;
24 thereby relieve the stress causing the original crack. Ductile
fractures propagate at lower velocities, typically, 250-1,000 ft./
26 sec. and are associated with substantial plpeline deformation.
27 Ductlle fractures can propagate for substantial distances, up to
28 several miles, ripping open the pipeline as if lt was unzipped.
29 Typically, ductile fractures run axially along the pipeline. Duc-
tile fractures predominate above a critical temperature termed the
-2- ~
2907
brittle-ductile transition temperature, althougll, dcpending upon tlle
means of fabrlcation, brittle fractures may be found at elevated
temperatures.
There is a belief that the propagation of ductile fractures
ls made possiblé by tile pressure of tlle natllral gas in the pipcllne
against the flaps forming the edges of the crack. ~y that mechanism the
crack may be driven forward at a velocity equal to the velocity of the
low pressure front caused by the escaping gas. In this manner, although
the gas pressure in the pipeline may rapidly drop as a result of gas
escaping through the crack, there i5 sufficient pressure at the flap to
cause the crack to propagate until it is arrested in some manner.
Many devices and methods have been discussed to arrest the
propagation of ductile fractures. Some suggest attaching large masses
to the pipeline to cause the fracture to deviate fromits straight line
path into a helical path in tlle hope that that will permlt the low
pressure front to catch up with the crack and result in an arrest.
Another method that has been suggested in Loncaric Patent No. 3,870,350
is to periodically interpose along the pipeline more brittle sections.
This is believed to cause arrest at the end of the brittle section where
the fracture again becomes ductile, due to the absence of the flap
driving force. These latter arrestors would seem to have the disadvantage
of artificiallylowering the crack reslstance of the pipeline: crack
initiation becomes mDre probable although less destructive.
Crack arrestors have been suggested to interfere mechanically
with the dynamic mechanism believed to sustain crack propagation. Thus,
flexible sleeves or hoops which are an integral part of the pipe have been
suggested to restrain flap formation - ~ ~ ~~ ~
. ., . _ , _ . , _ _ . , ,__, ..
~5Z907
l See "E~ulletin7' Research Laboratory, U S. Steel Corporation, April
2 10, 1~74. Such flexible sleeves or hoops have been suggested to
3 encricle the pipeline, in contact, and at zero or greater tension.
4 Typically, it is suggested that such arrestors should be made of
5 the same material as the pipeline. Crack arrestors have been sug- -
6 gested to interfere with the thinning of the pipeline in the region
of the propagating crack tip. These arrestors have been designed
8 to tightly restrain the circumference of the pipeline. See U.S.
9 Patent Nos. 2,401,092 (wire wound at high tension), 3,349,807
(steel strap or band at high tension), and 3,631,897 (tensioning
ll strands).
12 Each of the above-mentioned crack arrestors suffers from
13 the defect of requiring intimate contact ~s an integral part of the
14 pipellne. See also Risley U.S. Patent No. 3,096,105 (arrestor
welded to pipe seCtion). This defect is enhanced by the fact that
16 the pipeline itself undergoes circumferential expansion as a result
17 of the internal pressure of the transported gas. Thus, a balance
18 must be maintained between the size of the arrestor and the pipe-
l9 line's response to being pre~surized. A sleeve type crack arrestor
that is tight when the pipeline is brought up to operating pressure
21 will introd~ce bending stresQes into the pipe at the edge of the
22 arrestor that could contribute to the formation of a crack in the
23 pipe which is detrimental.
24 Plain sleeve type members have also been suggested in
connection with layipg deep underwater pipelines. See, e.g., Ells
26 U.S. Patent No. 3,860,039. There outside pressure on the pipeline
27 predominates over internal pressures durin~ the laying operation
28 and the major problem is to restrain buckling associated with pipe
29 oollapse and not crack propagation. For that purpose it has also
been suggested to weld reinforced sections into the pipelina.
~15~907
l SUM~1ARY OF THE INVE~TION
2 According to this invention there is provided a pipellne
3 craok arrestor system designed to restrain the tendency of ductile-
4 fracturing pipeline to develop an oval cross-section in advance of
a propagating ductile crack tip.
6 Briefly, a crack arrestor full encirculement band is
7 fabricated from a material of high tensile strength, which prefer-
8 ably is steel. Such steel should preferably be ductile fracturing
' 9 under the conditions of use, although that is not essential. Al-
ternatively, the arrestor may be made up of several sections that
ll are assembled in place at the pipeline.
12 The arrestor preferably has a highly geometrical shape
13 suoh as that of a formed channel wlth its sides orthogonal to the
14 pipeline surface to impart rigidity against ovaling. These bands
are applied ~u~ficiently out of contact with the pipeline so as
16 to provide a space between the arrestor and the pipeline at least
17 along some arc of the inner circumference of the bands, and,not
18 to provide a condition of full contact at zero tension. One result
~9 of such application is that no secondary longitudinal disoontinuity
stresses are imposed at the edges of the band and the radial expan-
~21 sion'of the pipeline is not restrained as the gas internal to the
22 pipeline is brought up to its high pressure state. In the pre-
23 ferred embodiment, the average radial spacing between the arrestor
24 and the pipe is on the order of 10 times the radial expansion that
the pipe undergoes when being brought up to pressure. The length
26 of the band longitudinally along the pipeline may be substantially
27 shorter than with conventional crack arrestors, typical valves
28 being ~rom 1/8 to 1~2 the diameter of the pipeline.
29 Accordingly, it ls an ob~ect of this ~nvention to provide
a new and improved orack arrestor ~ystem for press'urized pipelines.
--5--
.
, . . . . . ~ .
1152907
l It i~ a further object of this invention to provide an improved ap-
2 paratus that will retard and restrain ductile propagating cracks
3 in pressurized pipeline. It is a further object of this invention
4 to provide an improved pipeline for the transport of natural gas
compressed gas liquids or liquid-natural gas mixtures under preq-
6 sure that will restrain the propagation of ductile fracures along
7 its length.
8 Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be
9 apparent from the disclosure and the appended claims.
B~IEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
ll In the drawings, Fig. 1 represents a fragmented side view
12 of a section of the preferred embodiment comprising a pipeline hav-
13 ing a U-shaped formed channel ln position.
14 Fig. 2 is a vlew of a cross-section of the same embodi-
ment as Fig. 1 including a spacing material between the arrestor
16 and the pipeline.
17 Fig. 3 is a view of the cross-section of the rim of the
18 U-shaped preferred embodiment of the arrestor.
l9 Fig. 4 is a side view of a pip~eline after a propagating
ductile crack has been arrested.
Zl Fig. 5 is a fragmented side view of a section of a pipe-
22 line having a T-shaped ring in position.
23 Fig. 6 i9 a partially cut-away side view of a section of
24 a pipeline having an I-beam-shaped ring in position.
Fig. 7 is a fragmented side view of a section of a pipe-
26 llne having an I-beam-shaped formed channel in position.
27 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
28 Fig. 1 of the drawing ~how a plpeline 13 formed from a
29 plurallty of pipe sections having in place thereon a U-shaped
~ormed channel crack arrestor 11 spaced away from the arrestor
115Z907
1 along an arc. The arrestor is preferably formed from standard hot
2 rolled U-channel stock rolled into a band and full penetration butt
3 welded. The arrestor can be prefabricated and slipped over the end
4 or a gap in the pipeline during assembly or repair. Alternatively
the arrestor can be placed on an existing pipeline by splitting it
6 into two halves and then welding these into a ring with full pene-
7 tration butt welds.
8 The rim cross-section should have a highly angular shape
9 (i.e., a so-called highly geometrical shape) and substantial bulk
to inhibit deformation. An effective configuration for the rim
ll cross-section is shown in Fig. 3 where the base 3 which faces the
12 pipe is 1/6 of the pipeline diameter, the rim 7 has a width of 1/48
13 dlameters, the notch 5 has a width of 1/10 diameters, the side wall
14 10 has a height of 1/12 diameters and the trough 9 has a thic~ness
of 1/48 diameters.
16 A spacer material 12 may be inserted between the arrestor
17 and ~he pipeline to prevent destruction of any protective coatings
lB applied to the pipeline. The inner diameter of the arrestor should
l9 provide an average gap between the arrestor and the pipeline at
least about 1 1/2 times larger than the expansion of the pipeline
21 due to pressure exerted by the contents of the pipeline. The aver-
22 age gap may be as large as 15 to 20 times the expansion.
23 When assembled along the pipeline a plurality of arres-
24 tors i8 employed. This not only a~sures that a crack meets an ar-
restor before it covèrs a large distance, but also permits closely
26 spaced arrestors to cooperate by slowing a crack prior to arresting
27 it subsequently. As will be explained below, the present invention
28 has the unexpected feature of retarding the velocity of cracks be-
29 fore they reach an arrestor, and it is therefore possible for a
more remote arrestor to have its cooperative effect and ~id an
--7--
. ~ . ,
~ i
~1529~7
l earlier encountered arrestor to arrest a crack. This can permit a2 saving of material and weight as a multiplicity of lighter ar-
3 restors may replace a single larger conventional arrestor. It is
4 possible to use the arrestors of the present invention in combina-
tion with other types of arrestors to form a mixed arreqtor system.
6 Fig. 4 shows the observed manner in which the crack ar-
7 res~or of the preferred embodiment arrests a propagating ductile
B fracture 14. It will be noted that the tip of the fracture may
9 come to rest past the edge of the arrestor furthest from the direc-
tion of approach of the crack.
ll Figs. 5, 6 and 7 show alternate embodiments of highly
12 geometrical crack arrestor systems in which the individual arrestor
13 has T and I configurations. In eaoh~, the members 15 and 19 rising
14 from the part closest to the pipeline supply rigidity to the ar-
restor to restrain ovaling. It should be noted that unlike stan-
16 dard anchor flange reinforcements, the arrestors of Fig. 5 of pre-
17 sent invention are not welded to the pipeline.
18 In operation, the arrestors according to the present in-
l9 vention do not degrade the pipeline or alter its operating charac-
teristics. When a propagating ductile fracture approaches such
21 an arrestor, the energy release into the ovaling mode is absorbed
22 and as result the crack slows down. This slowing together with
23 absortion of the incident energy from the fractural pipe causes
24 the crack to arrest.
Experiment~s on a laboratory scale indicate that su¢cess-
26 ful arrests of propagating ductile fractures can be accomplished
27 with a loose-fitting formed channel having a length 1/6 of the pipe
2~ diameter and a yield strength 67% that of the pipe. The preferred
29 range of yield strength is between about 50 and about 150~ of the
yield strength of the pipeline. The preferred range of tensile
--8--
. `
1~52907
1 strength ls +50% of that of the pipeline. Although the channel is
~ the preferred embodiment, other shapes such as I or T beams welded,
3 cast or rolled into a loose-fitting rigid section are also pro-
4 posed. The channel arrestor is preferably formed from material
rolled into a circu,lar ring having full penetration butt weld. As
6 already mentioned, the arrestors may be placed on an existing pipe-
7 line by forming it into two or more sections and then welding these
8 $nto a ring with full penetation butt welds.
9 It is believed that the invention will provide the ad-
vantage of inducing no secondary stresses in the pipeline. Because
11 it is out of contact along an arc when no crack is present, spiral
12 welded pipe may be used without the need to grind off the spiral
13 weld seam ln the vicinlty of the arrestor to avoid intense local-
14 ized secondary stresses. Furthermore, because it is out of con-
~5 tact, a liner to prevent damage to the protective coatings on the
16 pipeline could be fitted in place at fabrication and all field
17 coating could be eliminated. Also, since the geometry of the ar-
18 restor need not conform closely to the pipeline, its ends may be
19 chambered to facilitate dollys rolling over it.
,To better understand the invention, it should be under-
21 stood that the region just in advance of the propagating ductile
22 crack tip although not yet cracked is sub~ect to stralns and defor-
23 mation that cause substantial ovaling of the pipellne's initially
24 circular cross-section. From the point of view of an observer see-
ing an advancing crack, ovaling occurs prior to the arrival of the
26 crack tip. The other phenomena such as flap formation, although
27 the may provide the dynamic means to maintain the crack' 9 propaga-
28 tlon, arrive at a position on the pipe only after the crack has
29 passed. Thus, an arrestor designed to restrain ovaling commences
to function before the crack has already passed through and there-
_9_
1152gO~ ,
1 fore acts before the larger stresses and pressures at the flap are
2 acting upon it. The action may be analogized to that of rock ~et-
3 ties at the ocean which gently reflect and break up propagating
4 waves before they reach the shoreline and thereby eliminate the
need for strong walls to protect beaches from crashing ocean waves
6 at full crest.
7 It is believed that an arrestor spaced from the pipe and
8 formed in a highly geometrical configuration sufficiently arrests
9 ovaling in high pressure gas pipelines to restrain crack propaga-
tion and in addition sufficiently slows such propagation to a point
11 where it can be more easily restrained by other crack arrestors in
12 close proximity further down the pipeline. One unexpected result
13 observed during tests on a laboratory scale of full encirclement
14 loose-fitting formed channel arrestors is that as a fracture ap-
proached such an arrestor, its speed was reduced substantially be-
16 fore the crack tip reached the arrestor. Thus, on an experiment
17 where the steady state crack propagation speed was 690 ft./sec.,
18 the appraoching crack was slowed to 515 ft./sec. prior to arriving
19 at ~he arrestor that assisted to arrest the rack.
It is believed that the retarding effect on crack propa-
21 gation permits the cooperation between a plurality of arrestors on
22 the same pipeline where~y one slows down a propagating crack so
23 that even if the arre-stor then fails to bring about a complete ar-
24 rest, the next arrestor in sequence may arrest completely. The ar-
restor~ should be within 2 pipeline diameters of each other.
26 Experimentation on reduced s¢ale pipelines having 6 inch
27 diameters indicates that when loose arrestors are employed not hav-
28 ing a highly geometrical rlm cross-section, such a9 loose-fitting
29 sleeves as small as 1/4 diametér long and having the same thickness
and yield strength as ~the pipe, they undergo gross plastlc deforma-
-10-
1~5Z90~
l tion for their entire length. These sleeve-type arrestors there-
2 fore need to be manufactured from a ductile material to avoid frac-
3 turing ~uring the arrest of a crack. In the present invention em-
4 ploying a formed channel or other geometrically shaped arrestor,
the arrestor may, however, be fabricated from ductile or brittle
6 cracking material. Also the present invention appears to arrest
7 a crack in a different manner-without the circumferential tearing
8 Of the pipe that occurs with the sleeve-type arrestors.
g - Therefore, in accordance with the invention, a crack ar-
restor comprises in its preferred embodiment a steel channel having
ll a length approximately 1/8 to 1/2 of the diameter of the pipeline
12 over which it is fitted so that the average radial spacing between
13 the pipe and the arrestor is between 1 1/2 and 20 tlmes the expan-
14 slon due to bringing the pipeline up to operating pressure.
16
17
.
18
19
21
22
23
2~ -
26
27
28
29
- 1 1 -
