Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
1 3 6~
MULTI-RESOLUTION IMAGE SIGNAL PROCESSING
APPARATUS AND _ ETHOD
This invention relates to signal processing
architecture for image filtering, and more particularly,
to an improved signal processing architecture for image
filtering employing multiple scanning arrays of differing
resolution
Architectures for processing image signals o
10 mixed halftone, text, and continuous tone are normally
quite complicated~ One cause is traceable to the limited
resolution capabilities of the reproduction apparatus
employed; another, to the need to process the differing
types of image signals in the particular and often
divergent ways required to provide an enhanced output.
One arrangement capable of accommodating both the limited
resolution capabilities of the re~production apparatus and
tbe differing proce~sing needs is disclosed in U. S.
Patent No. 4,194,221 issued on March 18, 1980 to James C.
9toff~1. In that system, a scrolling buf~er is employed
as a temporary store for the several lines of image
signals required. It would, however, be advantageous,
particularly in the light of the relatively hi-gh cost of
bufers, if the scrolling buffer used in that system5 could be reduced in size or eliminate~ entirely.
e ~s,~
. ~ ~ l~` This invention~ relates to an improved signal
processing architecture for image filtering requiring
only minimal ~ignal storage buffer capacity, comprising
in combination, a fir~t relatively high resolution image
30 scanning array; threshold means for thresholding the
image signals produced by the first array; a second
relatively low resolution image scanning array; means or
descreening and rescreening the image signals produced by
the second array; and selector means for selecting the
35 image signal output of the threshold means when the
original is composed primarily of text or low frequenry
.
:
6 3 4 ~
--2--
halftones, or of the descreening/rescreening means when
the original is composed primarily of high frequency
halftone images.
Other aspects of this invention are as follows:
In an apparatus for processing image signals
derived by raster scanning document originals, having
reduced image signal buffer requirements, the
combination of
first and second linear scanning arrays, the image
resolution of said first array being greater than the
image resolution or said second array to provide image
signals of different image content without resort to
buffer storage.
In an apparatus for processing image signals
derived by raster scanning original images, the
combination of:
a) a low resolution scanning array having plural
scanning elements for ~iewing relatively large areas of
said original images and producing image signals
representative of the image areas viewed;
b) first image signal processing means for
proce~sing image signals produced by said low
resolution array.to provide binary level image signals;
c) a high resolution scanning array having plural
scanning elements for viewing :relatively small areas of
said original images and producing image sig~als
representative of the image areas viewed;
d) second image signal processing means for
processing image signals produced by said high
resolution array to provide binary level image signals;
and
e) control means for selecting the output of one
of said first and second image signal processing means.
In a multi-resolution image scanning apparatus the
combination of:
first array means for scanning a first image area
with each scan; and
second array means for scanning a second image
area with each scan, said second image area being
K~ ~
; 3 ~1 ~
-2a-
larger than sald first image area whereby to provide
plural image signals representative of dif~erent
scanning resolutions~
In a multi-resolution image scanning apparatus,
the combination of:
first and second image scanning arrays, the
viewing area of said second array being greater than
the viewing area of said first array whereby said first
and second arrays view the image with different
resolutions; and
means for substantially centering the viewing
areas of said first and second arrays with one another
whereby said first and second arrays scan overlapping
areas of said image.
In a multi-resolution image scanning apparatus,
the combination of:
a first linear array for scanning one line of said
image;
a second linear array for scanning plural lines of
said image; and
means for substantially centering the viewing area
of said first array with the viewing area of said
second array whereby said first and second arrays scan
in overlapping fashion to produce image pixels of
different resolution.
A method of processing image signals derived by
raster scanning document originals, the steps
comprising:
a) scanning said originals at low resolution and
3~ at high resolution simultaneously to produce streams of
low resolution and hiyh resolution image signals
concurrently;
b) independently processing said streams of low
and high resolution image signals to provide binary
level image signals; and
c) selecting one of said streams of low and high
resolution binary level image signals in accordance
with khe imaginal content of the original being
!:cannea .
.
~ 3 6~4~
-2b-
Other objects and advantages of the present
lnvention will be apparent from the ensuing description
and drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic view showing the image
signal processing architecture of the present invention
with multi-resolution scanning array;
Figure 2 is an enlarged view showing details of
the multi-resolution scanning array shown in ~igure l;
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the image
signal processing architecture of the present
invention;
Figure 4 is a blocX diagram showing details of the
image processing architecture shown in Figure 3;
Figure 5 is a plot of an exemplary halftone/line
au~ocorrelation;
Fi~ure 6 is a schematic view showing details of
the pixel image data auto correlator;
Figure 7 is a graphical representation of typical
halftone and line image waveform generated by the auto
correlator of Figure 6;
Figure 8 is a schematic ~iew of the pixel output
selector;
Figure 9 is a schematic view of the descreening
filter shown in Figure 4;
Figure 1~ is an enlarged view of an alternate
multi-resolution array construction;
~ ~ &~3~ ~
--3--
Figure 11 is a graph comparing image signal
output of the high resolution scanning array with the
interpolated image signal output of the low resolution
array,
Figure 12 is a top schematic view of an alter-
nate architscture employing individual scanning arrays;
Figure 13 is a side schematic view of the
alternate architecture shown in Figure 12; and
Figure 14 is an enlarged view of an alternate
multi-reso~u~ion scanning array with aperture mask to
provide weighted pixel values.
Referring particularly to Figures 1 and 2 of
the drawings, the signal processing architecture of the
present invention includes a monolithic scanning array or
chip 10 having high and low resolution array pair 14, 16
thereon for simultaneously scanning an original 12 to
produce image signals or pixels representative of
original 12 ln registered context. In content, the
original 12 may be composed entirely of lines, (i.e.
text), or low frequency halftone images, or high
frequency halftone images, or continuous tone images, or
combinations thereof. Where th6! original 12 consists of
lines, as for example a typed page, the image signals
obtained are normally at one of two voltage levels, one
~5 representing non-image or background areas and the other
image areas.
A continuous tone image compri es an unscreened
image, typically a photograph. When scanned, the voltage
values of the image signals produced are representative
of the gray levels making up the picture.
A halftone image, typically a picture or scene,
is one which has been reproduced through a ssreening
process. One example is a newspaper picture. The screen
used may be either a high frequency or low frequency
screen. A high frequency screen is arbitrarily defined
herein as one having a frequency of 100 cells per inch or
~ 3 ~
--4--
more while a low frequency scre2n is defined as one
having a frequency less than 100 cells per inch. Half-
tone images therefore, comprise a pattern of discrete
dots, the dot size and frequency of which depends upon
the screening requency usedO When viewed by the human
eye, the dot pattern conveys a likeness of the original
picture or scene. The quality of the reproduction
depends upon the screening frequency used, wi~h higher
screen frequencies normally providing higher quality
reproduc~ions.
High and low resolution arrays 14, 16, which
are disposed in closely adjoining parallel relation on a
suitable substrate material 17, each include a plurality
of image viewing elements or cells 18, 18' for sensing
~he intensity of the image portion or area viewed by the
cell. Following viewing, which takes place over an
integration interval, the array cells 18, 18' are sampled
successively to produce a stream of analog image signals
or pixels representative of the image scanned. Prefer-
ably, the space 19 between arrays 14, 16 substantiallyequals the width of the scam line scanned by high
resolution array 14.
Arrays 14, 16 scan or view the document
original at different resolutions, high resolution array
14 scanning the image at a relatively high vertical reso-
lution while low resolution ar~ay 16 scans the image at a
relatively low vertical resolution. For this purpose,
the physical size or dimension of cells 18' of array 16
are larger than the cells 18 of array 14 in a vertical
scan direction ~i.e. along the Y axis) The resolution,
however, of both arrays 14, 16 along the sagittal or
horizontal direction (along the X axis) is the same. A
suitable lens lS is provided to focus arrays 14, 16 on
original 12.
As will be understood, suitable lamp means ~not
shown) are provided to illuminate the original 12,
during scanning. And, as will be understood, drive means
(not shown) are provided to establish relative scanning
movement between the scanning array 10 and the oriyinal
12 during scanning. One suitable apparatus of this
nature is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,122,352 issued
October 24, 1978 to Peter A. Crean et al.
Referring particularly to Figure 3, analog
image pixels produced by high resolution array 14 are
input via lead 20 to autocorrelator 22 which serves to
detect ~he presence of high frequency halftone data in
the pixel stream, as will appear. The signal output of
autocorrelator 22 controls selector 25 to output
processed image pixels from either low frequency halftone
and line processing section 28 or high frequency halftone
and continuous tone processing section 29 to output 30.
Image pixels from high resolution array 14 are
additionally input through line 21 to low frequency
halftone and line processing section 28 an* through line
23 to selector 27 of high frequency halftone and contin-
uous tone processing section 29.
Image pixels from low resolution array 16 are
input through line 24 to descreening filter 52 of high
frequency halftone and continuous tone processing section
2~.
Low frequency halftone and line processing
section 28 includes a high bandpass filter 46 for filter-
ing image pixels input to section 28. Filtered signals
from filter 46 are output to thresholder 47 where the
pixels are thresholded. Signals processed by thresholder
30 47 are input to binary line storage and delay buffer 49
where the pixels are held pending scanning of the same
image area by low resolution array 16, as will appear
more fully herein. From buffer 49, the pixels are output
to selector 25.
High frequency halftone and continuous tone
p ocessin~ section 29 includes a one dimensional
.~ ~
1 ~ 3 ~ ~
descreening filter 52 which serves to descreen the high
frequency image pixel output of low resolution array 16.
Descreened pixels are passed via selector 27 to screen 54
where the signals are rescreened. Continuous tone image
pixels from high resolution array 14 are input directly
to screening circuit 54 via lead 23 and selector 27.
Referring particularly to Figures 3-9, to
detect the presence of high frequency halftone image
data, autocorrelator 22 autocorrelates each pixel block
in accordance with a predetermined algorithm to determine
if the image data is high frequensy halftone or not. In
order to enhance that decision, additional pixels on both
sides of the pixel being investigated are used. In the
exemplary arrangement shown, image data is processed on a
pixel by pixel basis with pixel P4 being the particular
pixel in process at the instant shown in Figures 4 and 5.
Autocorrelation is carried out in accordance
with the following function:
t = last
A(n) = ~ x p(t~n)
t ~c'
where n - the bit or pixel number;
p = the pixel voltage value; and
t = the pixel position in the data stream.
The size of the image data blocks examined may
comprise one or more pixels, with a total block size
including the block of image pixels being examined
preferably being of ~rom 16 to 64 pixels in length. In
the exemplary arrangement shown, image pixels are
examined in blocks of one pixel each over a total pixel
length of 16 pixels. In this example, the 7 pixels ~P3,
P2, P1, P~, P0, P0, P0) preceding the pixel in question
(pixel P4) and the 8 succeeding pixels (P5, P6, P7, P8,
Pg r Plo ~ Pll r P12) are used in the autocorrelation
Process Where~ the block of pixels being examined
includes margin or areas outside the document edges,
represented by pixel P0, a pixel value of "0" is
arbitrarily used to represent the image value thereof.
`` ~ .1 ~63~
The resulting data is scanned for positive
peaks by a peak detector. Peaks above a certain
threshold level are detected and where the distance (i.e.
PERIOD) between the voltage peaks in the signal is less
than a preset number, a decision is made to treat the
pixel block being examined as high frequency halftone
image data. In that circumstance, a preset control
signal, i.e. a binary "1" is output to selector 25 via
line 26. Where the PERIOD is greater than the preset
number, a decision is made to treat the pixel block as
low frequency halftone or line and a second preset
signal, i.eO a binary "0" is output to selector 25. In
the case of continuous tone; selection is made by the
user or operator via selector 27, as will appear.
Selector 25 selects from the outputs of low
frequency halftone and line copy processing section 28,
and high frequency halftone and continuous tone pro-
cessing section 29 in response to the control signals
inputted thereto.
Referring to Figure 6, au~ocorrelator 22
includes a succession of flip flops 60-1 through 60 7
through which the input pixel stream input through line
20 are shifted, one pixel at a time. Correlators 62-1
through 62-8, which may comprise TRW 64 bit digital
correlators (Model TDC 1004J), have one input coupled to
pixel input line ~0 through distributor lead 63. Line 64
couples a second input of correlator 62-1 to a ~uitable
voltage source Vcc while lines 64' couple a second input
of the remaining correlators 62-2 through 62-8 to the
outputs of flip flops 60-1 through 60-7 respectively. A
typical output of correlators 62-1 through 62-8 for both
line and halftone image examples, is shown in Figure 5.
The signal output of correlators 62-1 through
62-8 is fed to one input of comparators 65-1 through 65-8
respectively. Comparators 65-1 through 65-8 may for
example~ comprise Signetics Model 521 comparators. A
~t ~
~:~6~
threshold voltage V, derived from a suitable voltage
source (not shown), is placed on the other input of
ccmparators 6S~1 through 65-8. The outputs of compar-
ators 65-1 through 65-8 are coupled to flip flops 66-1
through 66-8 respectively. The outputs of flip flops 66-
1 through 66-8, which to~ether combine to provide an
address signal to Read Only Memory (ROM~ 68, are coupled
to address bus 67.
ROM 68 provides a predetermined control signal
output in response to each address provided by flip flops
66-1 through 66-8. The output of ROM 68 is coupled to
control flip flop 70 which provides the control signal
input to line 26 controlling selector 25.
An e~ample of the function and operation of
comparators 65-1 through 65-8, together wi~h flip flops
66-1 through 66-8 in forming an address to ROM 68 in bus
67 is shown in Figure 7.
F.lip flops 60-1 through 60-7 t 66-1 through 66-
8, and 70 may comprise Texas Instruments Model SN 74174
chips.
In operation, input pixels are progressively
shifted through input flip flops 60-1 through 60-7 of
autocorrelator 22. As the pixels shift through flip
flop~ 60-1 through 60-7, autocorrelation of the pixel in
lina 20 with reference voltage Vcc and with preceding
pixels is carried out by correlators 62-1 through 62-8.
The output of each correlator is compared to a threshold
volta~e V by comparators 65-1 through 65-8. The result-
ing combined signal outpu~ of comparators 65-1 through
65-8 to output flip flops 66-1 through 66-8 provides an
address for ROM 68. The addressed signal output of RO~
6& s~ts flip flop 70, providing a control signal in line
26 to selector 25.
It will be understood that different threshold
voltages V may be applied to each correlator 65-1 through
65-8. Further, that number of pixels autocorrelated at
~ ~ ~fi3~
one time may be enla.rged or decreased by adding to or
subtracting from the component parts of autocorrelator
22.
Referring par~icularly to Figure 8, selector 25
comprises any suitable electronic switch operable in
response to a control signal input to couple one of the
output lines 41, 42 from low frequency halftone and line
processing section 28, or high frequency halftone and
continuous tone processing section 29 respectively to
outpu~ 30. For descriptive purposes, selector 25 is
illustrated simply as a two position rotary switch
effec~ive on a binary "0" control signal from autocor-
relator 22 to couple the output of low frequency halftone
and line processing section 28 to output 30, and on the
binary "1" control signal from autocorrelator 22, to
couple the output of high frequency halftone and
continuous tone processing section 29 to output 3~.
Buffer 49' in line 26 serves to delay the control signal
output for synchronization purposes, as will appear.
Referring particularly to Figure 4, low fre-
quency halftone and line copy processing section 28
includes a suitable high frequellcy enhancement filter 46
selected to provide detail enhancement o the low
frequency halftone image data or line copy image data in
a manner understood by those skilled in the art. One
implementation consists of a transversal filter similar
in implementation to that of the hereinafter described
descreening filter 52 with a different weighting
function.
Thresholder 47 comprises any suitable thresh-
olding circuit such as a Texas Instruments 74S85
comparator, effective to threshold the pixel being
examined ~pixel P4) with the output of circuit 47 going
to binary line storage/delay buffer 49. For example,
thresholder 47 may provide a single level threshold
against which the pixel being examined ~pixel P4) is
compared.
~ ~6~
--10--
Where the image pixels are determined to
comprise low frequency halftone or line copy image dataf
the data in storage~delay buffer 49 is output through
line 41 and selector 25 to output 30. In other cases, the
5 processed data is discarded.
High frequency halftone and continuous tone
processing section 29 employs a one dimensional descreen-
ing filter 52. For example, where the scanning frequency
is 500 scan lines/inch, filter 52 may comprise a simple
low pass 1 x 7 matrix linear filter preferably tailored
to provide some enhancement for sharpening edges at the
points where signal levels change, to smooth out the high
frequency image pixel outpu~ of low resolution array 15.
Following descreening, the image pixels are fed via
selector 27 to a relatively low frequency electronic
screen 54 of the type preferably employing cyclic changes
in threshold values whereat the pixels are rescreened at
a lower frequency. Where, as above, the original
sampling frequency is 500 scan Lines~inch, one suitable
screen comprises a 70 cells/inch 45 screen with conven-
tional S-shaped Tone Reproduction Control (TRC).
Continuous tone image signals output by high resolution
array 14 are input directly to screen 54 through selector
27.
Preferably, as will be understood by those
skilled in the art, the size of thP filter chosen scales
with the sampling frequency.
Where the image data is determined by autocor~
relator 22 to be high frequency halftone data, screen 54
is coupled through selector 25 to output 30. In other
cases, the data is discarded.
Referring particularly to Figure 9, details of
descreening filter 52 of high frequency processing
section 29 are thereshown~ Filter 52 which screens in
35 one dimension, i.e. the X direction has input shift
register 82 composed of successive flip flops 83-1
through 83-7. The pixel input to register 82 is shifted
sequentially through the flip flops 83-1, 83-2, ... 83 7
that comprise shift register 82.
Flip flops 83-1 and 83-7 have outputs coupled
to adder 84-1, flip flops 83-2 and 33-6 to adder 84-2,
and flip flops 83-3 and 83-5 to adder 84-3. Adders 84-1,
84-2 and 84-3, together with flip flop 83-4 are coupled
to multipliers 85-1 through 85-4, multipliers 85-1
through ~5-4 serving to multiply pixels input thereto by
a coefficient multiplier related to the number of ele-
ments that comprise the filter matrix. In the example
shown, filter 52 has a 1~7 matrix for a total area of 7
pixels. As a result, multipliers 85-1, 85-2, and 85-3
are programmed to multiply by a factor of 1/8 while
multiplier 85-4 is programmed to multiply by a factor of
1/4. ~ultipliers 85-1 and 85-2, and 85-3 and 85-4 are
coupled to adders 86-1 and 86-2 which sum the inputs
thereto. Adders 86-1 and 86-2 are coupled to adder 87
which sums the inpu~s thereto to provide the output from
filter 52.
It will be understood by those skilled in the
art that a digital transversal filter transfer function
can be optimized to perform various weighted averages of
the two dimensional context.
In the foregoing circuit, the flip flops used
therein may comprise Texas Instruments Model 745174
chips, the adders Texas Instruments Model 74S183 binary
adder~ and the multipliers TRW Model MPY8A binary multi-
pliers.
In operation, filter 52 effectively sums the
pixel image values of each lx7 pixel matrix including the
pixel (i.e. pixel P~) being processed, and divides
(through fractional multiplication) the total by the
number of pixels that comprise the screen matri~, in this
instance, 7. The result is the weighted average pixel
I36fi~
-12--
value of the neighborhood of the pixel being examined
(i.e. pixel P4) which represents the descreened value
thereof.
Determination of the presence of continuous
tone images is made by the operator or user through a
visual examination of original 12. Where continuous tone
imayes are found, selector 27 is moved to the continuous
tone position (the dotted line position shown in Fig. 3)
to input image pixels generated by high resolution array
14 directly to screen 54 for screening. Selector 27 is
controlled by a manually operated two-position controller
35 disposed at some conveniently accessible point.
To assure coupling of high frequency halftone
and continuous tone section 29 to output 30, the output
of controller 35, when in the continuous tone position,
overrides autocorrelator 22 to set selector 25 so that
section 29 is coupled to output 30.
Where the original 12 is not continuous tone,
controller 35 is set in the solid line position shown in
Fig. 3 of the drawings. This sets selector 27 to couple
the output of descreen filter 5;2 to screen 54 (the solid
line position shown in Fig. 3) 50 that high frequency
image pixels generated by low resvlution array 16 and
descreened by filter 52 are input to screen 54 for
rescreening. At the same time, control over selector 25
by controller 35 is relinquished.
In this circumstance, as original 12 is scanned
by scanning array 10, autocorrelator 22 analyzes the
image pixels generated by high resolution array 14 to
determine the type of image being scanned, i.e. high
frequency halftone or low frequency halftone and/or line.
Where the image is determined by autocorrelator 22 to
comprise high frequency halftone, a signal (i.e. "1")
from autocorrelator sets selector 25 to couple the output
of high frequency halftone and continuous tone processing
section 23 to output 30. As a result, image pixels
produced by low resolution array 16 and processed by
section 29 are discharged to output 30.
Where the image being scanned is determined not
to comprise high frequency half~one, the signal (i.e.
"0") from autocorrelator 22 sets selector 25 in the solid
line position shown in Figure 3 to couple low frequency
halftone and line processing section 28 to output 30. As
a result, image pixels generated by high resolution array
14 and processed by section 28 are discharged to output
30.
While manual determination of the presence of
continuous tone images by the operator or user through
the use of selector 27 is disclosed herein, automatic
determination of the image type may be envisioned. One
suitable system for automatically identifying image type
and processing image signals or pixels in accordance
therewith is disclosed in the aforecited U. S. Patent No.
;~, 4,1g4,221~ i~--~y~--~YY~ ~e~e~e1ffY-~ffe~e~
Referring now to Fiqures 1, 2 and 3, and
presuming scanning of the original 12 to be in the
direction shown by the arrow 36, it may be seen that high
resolution array 14 scans or views the document ahead of
low resolution array. Preferably, processing of the
image pixels generated by arrays 14, 16 is carried out at
a point when the image line scanned by high resolution
array 14 is centered with respect to the image line
scanned by low resolution array 16. For example, if low
resolution array 16 is presumed to scan five lines ~i.e.
lines Ll, L2, L3, L4, L5, in Figure 2) for every one line
(L) of high resolution array 14, processing is desirably
carried out when scan line L3 of low resolution array 16
and scan line L of high resolution array 14 coincide.
To accomplish the above described relation-
ship, line buffer 49 serves as a temporary store for
image pixel lines outpu~ by high resolution array 14
pending scanning thereof by low resolution array 16. In
,. ~ .
4 4
-14--
the exemplary arrangement snown and presuming the space
19 between arrays 14, 16 tG be the equivalent of one scan
line, then line buffer 49 would comprise a 4-line buffer
(i.eO line L, space 19, lines Ll, L2). Since the image
pixels are processed and hence are in binary form, the
size of buffer 49 is relatively small as compared to a
buffer for storing an equivalent number of lines of
analog image pixels prior to processing.
Line buffer 49' in the output line 26 of
autocorrelator 22 functions in a similar capacity to
synchronize the operation of selector 25 by autocor-
relator 22 with the scan line being examined.
In the embodiment shown in Figure 10 where like
numerals refer to like parts, high and low resolution
arrays 1~, 16 are disposed on substrate 10 such that the
longitudinal axis of array 14 is co-linear with the
longitudinal axis of array 16. As a result, the cells 18
of array 14 are centered with respect to the cells 13' of
array 16, cells 18' of array 16 occupying areas of
substrate above and below cells 18 of array 14.
With high resolution array -14 centered with
respect to low resolution array 16, the processing delay
required where the arrays 14, 16 are offset from one
another as in the previously described embodiment iq
unnecessary. Consequently, line delay buffers 49, 49'
~Figure 3) may be dispensed with in this embodiment.
Operation of the Figure 10 embodiment is the
same as that described in tha previous embodiment except
that delaying the output of line and low frequency h~lf-
tone processing section 28 and autocorrelator 22 pendingprocessing of image pixels by high fxequency halftone and
continuous tone processing section is no longer required.
Referring now to the embodiment shown in
Figures 11, 12 and 13, where like numbers refer to like
parts, individual arrays 114, 116 are provided to scan
original 12. Preferably, arrays 114, 116 are the same
~ ~ 663~
size and type although arrays ~f different size and
resolution may be contemplated.
To obtain high and low resolutions, high reso-
lution array 114 is disposed relatively closer to
original 12 than low resolution array 116. Suitable
optical means, such as lenses 115 may be provided to
focus arrays 114, 116 on original 12, as will be under-
stood by those skilled in the art. The relative
distances dl, d2, between arrays 114, 116 and the image
plane are chosen to provide the desired resolution
differential.
Since the size of the image area viewed by low
resolution array 116 is larger in both the X and Y
direction than the size of the image area viewed by high
resolution array 114 with attendant decrease in image
resolution of array 116 in both the X and Y directions, a
suitable pixel interpolator 125 is provided in the output
li~ne 124 of array 116. Interpo].ater 125 serves to inter-
polate additional image pixels along the X-axis to equate
the pixel resolution of low resolution array 116 to that
of high resolution array 114. One suitable interpolator
is di~closed in U~ S. Patent No. 4,193,092 issued on
March 11, 1980 to James C. Stoffel.
Inasmuch as the scan width of low resolution
array 116 is greater than tbat of a single high resolu-
tion array 114, one or more additional high resolution
arrays 114' are preferably provided to form a composite
high resolution scanning system having a scan width equal
to that of low resolution array 116. To assure an
uninterrupted scan line, the viewing fields of successive
high resolution arrays 114, 114' are preferably over-
lapped as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,149,09~ issued
April lO, 1979 to Martin A. Agulnek. A crossover control
126 is provided in the output lines 127, 128 of arrays
114, 114' to cross over from one high resolution array
114 to the ne~t succeeding high resolution array 114' as
663
6--
image pixels are being read out from high resolution
arrays 114, 114'.
Arrays 14, 16 may comprise any suitable
scanning array ~or example, Charge Coupled Devices (CCD)
manufactured by Fairchild Manufacturing Company, Model
No. 121-1728. A suitable pixel clock (no~ shown) is
provided for clocking image pixels and driving the
various components in synchronism, as will be understood
by those skilled in the art.
10~eferring to Figure 14, where like numbers
reEer to like parts, to provide predetermined weighted
values to the image pixels produced by low resolution
array 16 in the Y-direction, an apertured mask 130 i5
disposed over the array viewing elements or cells. In
the exemplary arrangement shown, where it is presumed
that low resolution array 16 scans an image area of five
lines (i.e~ lines Ll, L2, L3l L4, L5), the viewing
aperture 132 of mask 130 has a stepped configuration
providing a full viewing aperture 133 ~or the line
scanned concurrently with high resolution array 14 (i.e.
line L3), a reduced viewing aperture 134 for the adjoin-
ing line pair (i~e. lines L2, L4), and a further reduced
viewing aperture 135 for the next: succeeding or last line
pair (i.e. lines Ll, L5)~ Mask 130 may be comprised of
any suitable opti~ally opaque material as for example,
alumina.
While a stepped viewing aperture configuration
is shownl otber aperture configurations and sizes may be
envisioned
30As will be understood by those skilled in the
art, suitable reading circuitry may be provided to enable
the image produced to be enlarged or reduced.
While the invention has been described with
reference to the structure disclosed, it is not confined
to the details set forth, but is intended to cover such
modifications or changes as may come within the scope of
the following claims:
