Language selection

Search

Patent 1169115 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1169115
(21) Application Number: 425646
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR SUPPRESSING HALO ON FACE PLATE OF CATHODE RAY TUBE
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR SUPPRIMER LE HALO SUR L'ECRAN D'UN TUBE CATHODIQUE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 313/35.151
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H01J 29/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TEMPLE, MICHAEL D. (United States of America)
  • ANTHON, ERIK W. (United States of America)
  • RANCOURT, JAMES D. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1984-06-12
(22) Filed Date: 1983-04-11
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
036,495 United States of America 1979-05-07

Abstracts

English Abstract



ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE


A cathode ray tube face plate construction for suppressing the
halo on the face plate of the cathode ray tube having a face plate formed
of glass with an index of refraction in the vicinity of 1.52 and with outer
and inner surfaces. A fluorescent phosphor screen is carried by the inner
surface. A metallic coating may overlie the phosphor screen on the side of
the screen facing away from the face plate. An absorbing filter is disposed
between the phosphor screen and the face plate for absorbing light emitted
from the phosphor screen. An angle sensitive short wave pass filter is dis-
posed between the phosphor screen and the absorbing filter for reflecting light
emitted at a high angle from the phosphor screen.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



What is claimed is:


1. In a method for suppressing the halo on the face plate
of a cathode ray tube in which the face plate is formed of
glass having outer and inner surfaces and a fluorescent
phosphor screen, suppressing the central portion of the halo
by placing an anti-reflection coating on the outer surface
of the face plate and suppressing the outer ring-like
portion of the halo by placing an absorbing filter
comprising at least two metal-dielectric periods on the
inner surface of the face plate and causing the light which
normally forms the halo on the face plate to pass repeatedly
through said absorbing filter to selectively attenuate the
light creating the halo with respect to light creating the
display on the face plate.


2. A method as in Claim 1 wherein the light creating the
halo passes through the absorbing filter at least three
times.


3. A method as in Claim 2 together with the step of
reflecting the light having a high angle of incidence
emitted by the phosphor.
17

FA 34623-1-1/HCHJ



Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


'3115


This application is a division of our Canadian Patent Application
Serial No. 351,435 filed May 7, 1980.
This invention relates to a method of suppressing the halo on the
face plate of a cathode ray tube.
In United States Letters Patent 4,310,783, issued January 12, 1982,
inventor Temple et al., there is disclosed a cathode ray tube face plate con-
struction in which an angle sensitive coating is utilized for suppressing the
halo. As disclosed therein, the halo suppressing filter is a shortwave pass
type which has a very steep slope near the band of wavelengths that are emitted
by the phosphor on the face plate. At normal incidence, the filter has a region
of high transmission over the range of wavelengths where the phosphor is strong-ly emitting. At the wavelength which is just beyond the long wavelength limit
of the emission band, there is a steep transition to a high reflectance region.
When such an interference filter is formed of all dielectrics, the performance
curve for the filter will shift to shorter wavelengths as the angle of inci-
dence of light is increased away from normal. For high angle of incidence
light from the phosphor, the rays will be incident in the region of the perform-ance curve where the filter reflects well and they will be prevented from en-
tering the face plate. In order to obtain a sharp transition between reflect-
ing and transmitting regions of the filter, many layers are required in such a
filter which makes the filter prone to coating errors and, therefore, diffi-
cult to manufacture. In addition, it has been found that such an all dielectric
filter has a reflectance which is independent of the direction from which the
light is incident. Since it is desired that such a filter have a large re-
flectance at moderate and higher angles of incidence from the phosphor side, it
follows that such a filter will also be highly reflecting when viewed by ~n
~ ,

~itiS~3~ ~ 5

observer looking at the display through the substrate. When the phosphor screen
is viewed in a brightly lit room, the display will be difficult to observe
and the reflections of the room and from the observer himself will be very
distracting. In the past, attempts have been made to reduce such reflections by
the use of a circular polarizing filter in front of the screen. The use of such
a circular polarizing filter has the limitation in that there is an upper limit
on the transmission that can be obtained. Due to the nature of such circular
polarizing filters, generally no more than 40% of the incident light can be
transmitted through it. Where the optimum transmission required is less than
this amount, additional neutral density filters can be included to obtain the
desired level of transmission. However, on the other hand, if the optimum level
of transmission required is greater than the 40% which can be obtained through
such a circular polarizing filter, the use of a circular polarizing filter
must be abandoned. In addition, the cost and environmental stability of circular
polarizing filters also limit their applications. Another alternative has been
to utilize a cyan or shortwave pass absorbing filter in the front of the face
plate of the cathode ray tube. In such a situation, at least the front surface
of the filter should be provided with anti-reflection coating in order to main-
tain the signal to noise ratio. This becomes particularly important in a
brightly lit room where the reflections by the separate absorbing filter of
the surrounding scene increase the difficulty with which the display can be
seen. Another disadvantage of such an approach is that the separate filter
reduces the visibility of the graticule conventionally carried by the screen
of the cathode ray tube. In addition, it should be appreciated that the use
of such a separate absorbing filter reduces the halo and the signal illumination
from the screen in the same proportions and does not reduce the halo selectively.

~i~9115

Another alternative, the use of absorbing glass in the face plate
of the cathode ray for reducing the halo effect, also has disadvantages. This
approach also is not practical in many situations because the graticule on the
interior surface of the face plate is illuminated from the edge of the screen
and any absorption produces a non-uniform illumination of the graticule as a
function of position on the screen. Furthermore, any scattering in the ab-

- sorbing glass would strongly affect the visibility of the display. Ln addition,
conventional absorbing glass which can be utilized in such a face plate has the
disadvantage that it does not have a high enough density to suppress the soft
x-ray emission which may be generated by the electron gun in the cathode ray
tube. It isJ therefore, apparent that there is a need for a new and improved
face plate construction for a cathode ray tube and a method for suppressing the
halo.
In general, it is an object of the present invention to provide a
method for suppressing the halo on the face plate of a cathode ray tube.
According to a broad aspect of the invention, there is provided, in a method
for suppressing the halo on the face plate of a cathode ray tube in which the
face plate is formed of glass having outer and inner surfaces and a fluores-
cent phosphor screen, suppressing the central portion of the halo by placing an
anti-reflection coating on the outer surface of the face plate and suppressing
the outer ring-like portion of the halo by causing the light which normally
forms the halo on the face plate to pass repeatedly through an absorbing filter
to selectively attenuate the light creating the halo with respect to light
creating the display on the face plate.
Additional objects and features of the invention will appear from
the following description in which the preferred embodiments are set forth in
detail in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

l ~ti''~l15


The face plate construction for the cathode ray tube is comprised of a
sheet of glass having front and rear surfaces. An absorbing filter is carried
by the rear surface. A phosphor screen overlies the absorbing filter and an
optional metallic coating may overlie the phosphor screen. The absorbing filter
is comprised of at least two laycrs with one of the layers being formed of a
dielectric and the other of the two layers being formed of metal. The absorbing
filter can be utilized in combination with an angle sensitive shortwave pass
filter and in which the shortwave pass filter is disposed between the absorbing
filter and the phosphor screen.
Figure 1 is a cross sectional view of a cathode ray tube and a face
plate construction incorporating the present invention and utilizing only an
absorbing filter.
Figure 2 is a cross sectional view of another cathode ray tube having
a face plate construction incorporating the present invention in which an angle
sensitive shortwave pass filter is utilized in conjunction with an absorbing
filter.
Figure 3 is a calculated performance of an absorbing filter.
Figure 4 is a graph showing the calculated performance of an angle
sensitive shortwave pass filter.
Figure 5 is a graph showing the calculatecl performance of a combination
absorbing filter and angle sensitive shortwave pass filter utilized as interior
coating on a cathode ray tube incorporating the present invention.
Figure 6 is a graph showing the calculatedsingle surface reflectance
and transmittance of a 50% transmission design incorporating the present invention.
A ,face plate construction 16 incorporating the present invention for use
on a cathode ray tube 17 with the exception of the face plate 16 is conventional
and as is well known to those skilled in the art, it is comprised of a funnel
1~ formed of conventional material such as glass on which there is

-- 4 --

llti'3115

mounted an electron gun 19. The electron gun 19 produces electrons which are
adapted to impinge upon the back or rear side of the face plate 16 as is well
known to those skilled in the art to produce a display.
The fact plate construction 16 consists of a face plate 21 formed of
a sheet or pane of glass of a conventional type having an index of refraction
in the range 1.45 to 1.75 and may have a high density. The face plate 21 is
provided with first and second or front and rear generally planar parallel sur-
faces 22 and 23 which also can be identified as observer's side and phosphor
side surfaces. A graticule 24 is typically planed on the inner or second
surface 23 in the conventional manner such as by silk screening a glass frit
material onto the rear side of the sheet 11 and firing it to fuse the graticule
onto the sheet.
After the graticule has been placed upon the surface 23, an absorbing
filter is placed over the graticule by placing the face plate in a vacuum
chamber and vacuum depositing the desired layers for an absorbing filter 26
over the graticule so that the absorbing filter 26 overlies the graticule 2
and is carried by surface 23.
The absorbing filter 26 is a metal and dielectric structure and is
comprised of at least two layers, one of the layers being a metal layer and the
other layer being a dielectric layer to form a period. Additional periods of
one dielectric layer and one metal layer can be provided to provide a multi-
layer absorbing filter having a plurality of periods.
In selecting materials to be utili~ed in the absorbing filter 26, cer-
tain criteria should be observed. By definition, the index of refraction of an
absorbing material has an imaginary component (k). The ratio of the real
component (n) to (k) should be n equal to approximately 0.7 to 3Ø Examples

llS


of materials which fall in this class are nickel, chrome, Nichrome (trademark),
molybdenum and Inconel (trademark).
The choice of the dielectric component for the absorbing filter 26 is
based on design considerations which provide a low reflectance from the ob-
server side of the filter. At the same time, design consideration can be
given towards achieving a particular tint or hue for visibility or other reasons
as well. Thus, any transparent dielectric material can be utilized, but pre-
ferably those with indices between 1.35 and 1.70. The specific metal and the
specific dielectric material selected for the combination in the absorbing
filter 26 are determined by the criteria which must be met. For example, the
nominal transmission and reflection values for the filter are selected for use
in the environment in which the filter is to be used and which it must be able
to withstand. Once these parameters have been specified, one skilled in the
design of thin film filters working within the guidelines herein presented
should have no difficulty in sel0cting appropriate materials and their res-
pective thicknesses for the design of an appropriate observing filter.
In Tables I and II set forth below there are two filter designs which
include a shortwave pass filter plus an absorbing filter.


11~i'3~5

TABLE I
35% Nominal
Physical
Layer Material Thickness (nm)
-
Glass
1 Ni 4.5
2 F.S. 94.28
3 Ni 8.3
4 F.S. 94.28
TiO2 62.22
6 F.S. 161.13
7 TiO2 52.73
8 F.S. 144.34
g TiO2 62.33
F.S. 63.60

TABLE II
50%T Nominal
Physical
Layer Material Thickness (nm)
Glass
1 Mo 7.5
2 P.S. 93.77
3 TiO2 58.66
4 F.S. 157.54
TiO2 58.01
6 F.S. 144.68
7 TiO2 67.61
8 F.S. 75.77
Air
The design shown in Table I is for 35% nominal transmission and the filter design
shown in Table II is for 50% nominal transmission. In Table I, the first four
layers, namely layers 1 through 4 counting from the glass, form an absorbing



filter whose performance is shown in Figure 3. Curve 27 in Figure 3 shows the
transmission for the absorbing filter and as can be seen from the graph shows a
nominal transmission of approximately 35%. Curves 28 and 29 which are also
labeled as Rl and R2 show the reflectance from the observer or outer side and the
phosphor or inner side respectively for the absorbing filter formed by the first
four layers 1 through 4 in Table I.
After the absorbing filter 26 has been formed on the surface 23, a
fluorescent phosphor screen 31 is deposited on the surface 23 so it overlies the
absorbing filter 26 in a manner well known to those skilled in the art. There-

after, an optional metallic coating such as aluminum may be deposited on the side
of the screen 31 facing away from the sur~ace 23 for a purpose well known to
those skilled in the art as described in United States Letters Patent No.
3,185,020, issued January 12, 1982, Inventor, Temple, et al.
In the use of such an absorbing filter in connection with the face
plate, it is desirable that the reflectance be less than a 10% maximum through-
out the visible region. As will be noted from Figure 3, the maximum reflectance
is in the vicinity of 3 or 4 percent in the visible region for a design of the
type shown in Table I. In general it is desirable to have the reflectance from
the observer side be in the same order of magnitude as uncoated glass and even
lower, if possible. Typically, uncoated glass with an index of refraction of 1.52
has a reflection of about 4 1/4% per surface.
It should, however, be appreciated that if desired, an absorbing filter
having different characteristics can be utilized, if desired. Thus, the charac-
teristics should be such that the reflection would correspond to that desired.
Por example, in suggesting that the reflectance be between 3% and 4% in the
visible region viewing by the human eye is contemplated. If the cathode ray

115


tube is to be viewed by film having the particular characteristics, then the
coating which is utilized should be one which corresponds to the characteristicsdesired by the film which is to be used.
Although the absorbing filter shown by the design in Table I had a
nominal transmission of approximately 35%, it should be appreciated that absorb-ing filters can be provided having a transmission ranging from 10 to 80%. The
metal layer or layers provide the absorption which is necessary to obtain the
desired transmission whereas the dielectric ~ayer essentially anti-reflects the
metal and prevents the normal specular refelction of the metal. As can be seen,
the metal layer is deposited first and then the dielectric layer. In the design
shown in Table I, nickel has been utilized as metal and fused silica having an
index of refraction of approximately 1.45 has been utilized.
In Table II, there is shown a filter in which the first two layers 1
and 2 form an absorbing filter of the present invention and provide approximately
50% nominal transmission. In this design, molybdenum was used as the metal
layer and Eused silica as the dielectric one.
If desired, an anti-reflection coating 22 such as that described in
United States Letters Patent No. 3,185,020, issued May 25, 1965, inventor A.
'I'helen et al, can be applied to the first front or outer surface of the sheet 21.
The use of the absorbing filter in the face plate construction provides
a relatively economical solution for reducing the halo. This is because the
light which forms the halo must pass through the absorbing filter three times sothat there is much more attenuation of the halo producing light than of the signal
light which only must pass once through the absorbing filter. Thus there is
provided a greatly increased contrast and muc~l improved visibility of the signal
which is to be observed.

l ~tjt3ll5

As pointed out in United States Letters Patent No. 3,185,020 which
issued January 12, 1982, inventor Temple, et al, the halo producing light is the
light which is emitted from the phosphor grains at quite high angles to the
normal and typically would pass through the absorbing filter, then through the
face plate to be reflected off the front surface of the face plate and returned
through the absorbing filter where it would illuminate the phosphor grains to
cause scattering. Any such scattered light visible to the observer would have
passed through the absorbing material three times to greatly attenuate the halo
producing light. The normal signal light which would be seen by the observer
would only have to make one pass through the absorbing filter.
In the embodiment of the invention shown in Figure 1, the halo is
attenuated strictly by absorption. This approach has a disadvantage in that in
order to substantially attenuate the halo, it is necessary to have a density level
which is relatively high; this may be objectionable where the amount of light
given off by the display may be inadequate after such substantial absorption.
When such is the case, it is desirable to combine the absorption filter with an
angle sensitive short wave pass filter as shown in the embodiment in Figure 2.
~ s shown in Figure 2, the face plate construction 36 forms a part of a
cathode ray tube 37 having a funnel 38 and electron gun 2~. The face plate
construction 36 consists of a face plate 41 formed of clear glass and which is
provided with parallel first and second surfaces 42 and 43. The first and second
surfaces 42 and 43 can also be characterized as outer or observer and inner or
phosphor side surfaces respectively. A graticule 44 is formed on the surface 43
in the same manner as the graticule 24. An absorbing filter 46 is carried by
the second surface 43 and overlies the graticule 44. The absorbin~ filter 46 is
combined with an angle sensitive short wave pass filter 47 of the type described



- 10 -


~ 3~1~

in United States Patent No. 4,310,783 which issued on January 12, 1982, inven-
tor, Temple, et al. This angle sensitive short wave pass filter overlies the
absorbing filter 46. As described in United States Patent No. 4~310,783, which
issued on January 12, 1982, inventor~ Temple et al., the angle sensitive short
wave pass filter is an interference filter comprised of a plurality of layers and
having a low reflectance for light emitted by the phosphor at high angles of
incidence and a high reflectance for light emitted by the phosphor at low anglesof incidence.
Layers 6 through 10 of the filter design shown in Table I comprise a
short wave pass filter which has significant change of performance as the angle
of incidence is increased away from normal incidence. As can be seen, the short
wave pass filter is formed of fused silica and titanium dioxide layers having
specified physical thicknesses. The calculated performance of such a short wave
pass filter is shown in Figure 4 in which the transmission is given by the curve51 and the reflectance is given by the curve 52.
A fluorescent phosphor screen 48 is deposited over the angle sensitive
short wave pass filter. An optional metallized coating 49 overlies the phosphor
scre¢n. Both the phosphor screen and the metallized coating are of the type
hereinbefore described.
The calculated performance for the ten layer filter design as shown in
Table I is shown by the curves in Figure 5. Thus, the curve 56 shows the trans-
mission for the combined filter whereas the curve 57 represents the reflectance
of the filter when viewed by an observer and the curve 58 is the reflectance from
the phosphor side of the face plate.
From Figure 5 it can be seen that by combining the absorbing filter with
the angle sensitive short wave pass filter, a combined effect from both filters
is obtained.

115

The light that is emitted from the phosphor at high angles is prin-
cipally reflected by the short wave pass filter. In order to limit the cost of
the short wave pass filter and to make it easily producible, the number of layers
of the short wave pass filter has been limited as, for example, the six layers
shown in Table I so that it is not 100 percent efficient. This means that
some small amount of high angle light (less than 41 from a line perpendicular
to the inner surface of the face plate) will leak through the short wave pass
filter. Such light which does leak through the short wave pass filter must
pass through the absorbing filter section 46 where it is further attenuated.
What little light that gets through the absorbing filter during its first
pass will be reflected off the surface 43 after which it must pass down
through the absorbing filter 46 where it is attenuated again. However, since
this light is still at a relatively high angle, what little light remains will
be reflected by the short wave pass filter and bounced out of the system.
Thus, it can be seen that by adding a very few layers to the absorbing filter,
a much improved performance can be obtained over that which is provided by
just a short wave pass filter by itself. In addition, the absorbing filter
reduces scattered white light. It helps to eliminate the halo and it also
incrcases the contrast of the final display.
Unexpected resul~s were obtained with the combination of the absorbing
filter with the angle sensitive short wave pass filter. Normally, one skilled
in the art would expect to obtain fairly high reflection off the short wave
pass filter from the observer's side. The results from the combined filter show
there is, in fact, less specular reflection than one would expect from combining
a normal absorbing filter with the short wave pass filter. By way of example, one
would expect to obtain 4 to 5% reflection from such a combination when, in fact,

1 ltj<~l~S


a reflection as low as 2% was achieved, which is a factor of two less than
expected. This is an important feature for the present invention, particularly
in areas in which the cathode ray tube is to be viewed where there is high
illumination.
Although it is no longer critical, it still may be desirable to provide
an anti-reflection coating 61 on the outer front surface 42 of the face plate 41.
As explained above, an anti-reflection coating of the type described in United
States Letters Patent No. 3,185,020whichissued May 25, 1965, inventor A. Thelen
et al., can be utilized.
The arrangement shown in Figure 2 in which the absorption filter is
placed between the observer and the short wave pass filter has the advantage in
that the short wave pass filter which reflects light that used to form the halo
is now reflected back onto the phosphor grains and gives increased spot bright-
ness. This spot brightness is achieved even though there is some attenuation of
the light by the absorption filter. By combining the absorbing filter with the
short wave pass filter, the attenuation of the absorbing filter of the desired
high angle signal light rays is negligible.
The filter which is shown in Figure I was designed for phosphor which
emits at approximately 525 nanometers. Thus, as shown in Figure 5, the trans-
missivity at approximately 520 nanometers is approximately 30%. The reflectance
from the observer's side as represented by the curve 57 is almost zero. The re-
flectance from the inside or phosphor side is in the order of 10% less, as shown
by the curve 58. As can be appreciated with the present invention, at normal
incidence it is important to have low reflectance so that the transmission can be
quite high. As pointed out in United States Patent No. 4,310,783, which issued
on January 12, 1982, inventor, Temple et al., when the same curves are calculated

31~5


at an angle because of the angle sensitivity of the short wave pass filter, the
reflection curve goes to much higher values at the shorter wave lengths which
provides the angle sensitivity herein before described.
In Table II there is shown a short wave pass filter plus an absorbing
filter design comprised of eight layers in which 50% nominal transmission in the
layers 1 and 2 form the absorbing layers formed of molybdenum and fused silica
respectively and wherein a short wave pass filter is formed of layers 3 through
8 formed of titanium dioxide and fused silica.
In making absorbing and angle sensitive short wave pass filters in
accordance with the present invention, it was f~und that the measured performance
was very close to the calculated performance shown in the curves herein before
described.
The calculated single surface reflectance and transmittance of a 50%
transmission design is shown in Figure 6 in which the curve 66 represents the
transmittance, curve 67 represents the reflectance from the observer side and
curve 6X represents the reflectance from the phosphor side. As can be seen, the
reflectivity from the outer or observer side is slightly Kreater than for 30%
transmission which is caused by a little lower attenuation of the ref]ectance from
thc short wave pass filter. Again, filters constructed in this manner had mea-
sured reflectances which agreed substantially with the calculated reflectances.
From the foregoing it can be seen that there has been provided a new
and improved face plate construction which uses an absorbing filter by itself or
the combination of an absorbing filter with an angle sensitive short wave pass
filter to substantially attenuate the formation of a halo on the face plate. There
is unrestricted viewing of the graticule since the filter is applied behind the
graticule as seen by the observer. Further, the graticule can be edged l;ghted
uniformly over the entire surface area. The reflectance from the observer side of


- 14 -

~ ~ ti'31~5


the phosphor glass interface can be madc low for much larger angular ranges
when absorbing material is used. With the filter construction herein described,
the layers of the absorbing filter and the layers of the short wave pass filter
can be deposited in the same vacuum. There are no additional surfaces which
can reflect light towards the observer or which need to be anti-reflection
coated. The filter of the present invention is protected since it is within
the envelope of the cathode ray tube and thus is immune to optical degradation.
In addition, it is immune to scratching which could be due to mishandling or
improper cleaning techniques.
Because the light which forms the halo must pass three times through the
absorbing filter while the signal light passes through the absorbing filter only
once, the filter of the present invention selectively attenuates the halo.
In the present invention, the background color of the screen can be
adjusted to give a pleasing tint or to enhance the color contrast of the display.
Ihc reason that the combined short wave pass and absorbing filters is
more effective than the short wave pass filter alone in decreasing the intensity
of the llalo is that the light emitted at high angles by the excited phosphor
grains which is not reflected by the SWP filter is absorbed by the absorbing
filter rather than being reflected back to the phosphor by the first surface to
2~ cause the halo.
The reason that the combined SWP and absorbing filters is more effective
than the absorbing filter alone in decreasing the intensity of the halo is that
the light emitted at high angles by the excited phosphor grains is reflected back
into the phosphor screen, thereby increasing the brightness of the central spot.
Relatively high absorption levels would be required in the absorbing filter to
climinate the halo in the absence of the SWP filter.


l l~ 15


From the foregoing it can be seen that an absorbing reflecting coat-
ing can be utilized to reduce the halo effect while increasing ~he contrast of
the cathode ray tube display. Only a small penalty in the intensity of the
display need be incurred and part of this loss may be recovered by the improve-
ment in the efficiency of the spot from the light reflected back from the halo
reducing angle sensitive short wave pass filter.


Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1169115 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1984-06-12
(22) Filed 1983-04-11
(45) Issued 1984-06-12
Expired 2001-06-12

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1983-04-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
OPTICAL COATING LABORATORY, INC.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-12-08 16 594
Drawings 1993-12-08 3 49
Claims 1993-12-08 1 27
Abstract 1993-12-08 1 17
Cover Page 1993-12-08 1 15