Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
-` 11~1~79
PRIOR ART
Complex catalysts employing Group VIII noble metals,
particularly rhodium, are used for the homogenous catalysis of
reactions in which carbon monoxide with or without hydrogen may b~
reacted with various organic molecules to produce compounds having
a higher molecular weight. The reactions of particular interest
with respect to the present invention are those qenerally desig-
nated as hydroformylation and carbonylation. Such reactions are
shown in many patents, for example U.S. 3,579,552 and British
1,468,940 and 1,538,782. The noble metal catalysts are considerec
to be complexes which typically include carbon monoxide, promotins
metals, and/or non-metallic promoters.
Reaction products must be separated from the homogenous
catalyst. Typically, this is done by distilling tne reactor
effluent to separate the organic compounds and leaving behind the
noble metal catalyst and other heavier materials which can then be
recycled to the reaction vessel. The prior art discloses means b~
which the noble metal is recovered directly from reactor effluente
for further use. However, in general the art indicates that heav~
residues accumulate and must be purged from the reaction system.
Such residues contain substantial amounts of noble metal which
must be recovered in order for the process to be carried out
economically. Since rhodium is the principal noble metal used,
the discussion herein will refer specifically to rhodium, but it
is to be understood that other noble metals are not excluded.
Palladium alone, or in mixtures with rhodium, is also a particu-
larly useful catalytic metal.
~1 ~
1206 - 2 -
I
11'71t379
Rhodium has been recovered by many techniques, but at
least three general approaches have been disclosed. First, the
rhodium is recovered as the metal itself, which could require
reformulation of the catalyst for further use. Second, the
rhodium may be recovered on a solid material, which may serve as c
catalyst support. Third, the rhodium is recovered in a form
acceptable for returning to the reactor, with or without some
additional processing to improve its catalytic properties.
Rhodium may be recovered as a metal by pyrolysis as
shown in U.S. 3,920,449, which involves the hign temperature
decomposition of residues and rhodium-containing ca~alyst. The
rhodium typically is recovered as the metal or oxide and can then
be reprocessed as required to provide catalyst or catalyst precur-
sors for recycle to the reaction mixture.
The second recovery technique may be illustrated by U.S
3,899,442 in which rhodium is deposited on a solid support in
conjunction with pyrolysis of the residues. An alternative is
shown in U.S. 3,978,148 in which rhodium is adsorbed on activated
carbon, from which it could be recovered.
Rhodium also may be recovered by precipitation from
solution in a form which is not necessarily metallic, but may be
returned directly to the reaction vessel or pretreated before the
recycling. Many methods of this sort have been disclosed in the
prior art. ~lthough the catalyst typically is soluble under
reaction conditions, it may be possible to form insoluble com-
pounds by the addition of water as shown in U.S. 2,839,580,
2,880,241, and 3,821,311. U.S. 3,887,489 shows the precipitation
of rhodium-containing compounds by heatin~ zeaction zesidues for
sufficient period of time and temperature. ~nother technique
;., l
1 1206 - 3 -
~1 '
,A~
. ~.
li71879 ~
shown in U.S. 3,560,539 is the use of hydrogen or hydrides to
reduce carbonyl content of the tar to hydroxyl groups and thereby
to release the rhodium complex which precipitates and can be
recovered. The selective adsorption on solids, such as silica, of
the residues to separate them from the rhodium catalyst is shown
in U.S. 3,539,634. A solvent then is used to recover the residues
from the adsorbing solids. The opposite approach, namely, the
adsorption of rhodium on a solid adsorbent is disclosed in U.S.
3,716,626.
Rhodium can also be extracted from reaction residues
with strong acids accompanied by water and other solvents.
Typical disclosures are found in U.S. 3,420,873, 3,641,076, and
3,857,895. Related treatments with acids and peroxides are shown
in U.S. 3,547,964 and 4,021,463.
In connection with the carbonylation process to be
completely described both hereinafter and in British patents
1,468,940 and 1,538,7B2, it has been found that carbonylation
roactlon residues are not easily separated from the rhodium which
they contain. In commonly-assigned U.S. patentæ
4,341,741; 4,340,5~9 and 4,340,570
the use of amine treatments to assist the extraction of rhodium by
ac~ds is disclosed. Now, it has been found that the tars can be
preferentially extracted from the reaction mixture with suitable
solvents.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The residues created during carbonylation reactions,
particularly the carbonylation of esters or ethers, especially
. carbonylation of methyl acetate or dimethyl ether to acetic
anhydride or ethylidene diacetate, are resistant to the extraction
of Group VIII noble metal catalysts, typically rhodium, by strong
,,.,,,
.,i'
1206 - 4 ~ I
, . I
li'71Y7Y
acids. It has been found that if carbonylalion reaction mixtures
or concentrates thereof are contacted with suitable solvents, the
tars can be preferentially extracted, there~y separating them fro
the rhodium (or other noble metal~. The tars can be separated
from the solvent and disposed of and the solvent reused.
; Certain solvents have been found to extract some rhodiu~
as well as the tars. Others have been found to extract the tar
portions of the residues quite selectively and to leave substan-
tially all of the rhodium behind. Suitable solvents for such
preferential extraction of rhodium are the alkanes, cyclo alkanes
halogenated alkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons. More generally,
the solvents may be characterized as belonging to groups I, VIb,
and VII as defined by L. R. Snyder, J. of Chromatography 92,
223-230, 1974, plus the alkanes and cycloalkanes which are not
assigned to a group by Snyder. In particular, cycloalkanes such
as cyclohexane are preferred, along with aromatic hydrocarbons,
such as toluene. Other particularly useful classes of solvents ar
the halogenated alkanes, such as carbon tetrachloride and alkyl
ethers. Typically, a volume ratio of about 0.5-10 of solvent to
tar is employed.
~rief Description of the Drawings
The sole figure is a block diagram showing generally ho~
the invention may be applied to a carbonylation reactor.
,, ,
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
,,
, The recovery of ~roup VIII noble metals, especially
rhodium, from carbonylation and hydroormylation reaction residue
has been of considerable interest to those skilled in the art. o~
particular concern to the present inventors is the recovery of
','
1206 ~ 5 ~ I
1~ 117~ 9
Group VIII noble metals, particularly rhodium, from catalysts usec
in the carbonylation of a carboxylate ester or an alkyl ether to
an anhydride, especially the carbonylation of methyl acetate or
dimethyl ether to acetic annydride. In another aspect, the inven-
tion relates to recovery of similar rhodium catalysts used for
carbonylations in the presence of hydrogen, particularly the car-
bonylation of methyl acetate and/or dimethyl ether to ethylidene
diacetate. These processes have been described in depth in
British Patents 1,468,940 and 1,538,782 and are summarized below.
The processes are important since they produce chemicals of value
both for direct use and as intermediates. However, the recovery
of Group ~III noble metals according to the present invention is
not considered to be limited to the carbonylation processes of
particular interest.
,, ~
RecoverY of Noble Metals
The invention broadly relates to the selective removal
of tars, L.e. heavy high-boiling res1dues, produced by carbonyla-
tion reactions, with or without hydrogen being present. These
heavy residues are complex and their composition is not fully
characterized. Uhere they have been produced during the carbony-
I lation of ester or ethers, they are known to contain high mole-
cular weight compounds with organic carbonyl and acetate func-
tions. If a sample of a carbonylation reaction mixture is flashed
and concentrated the tars which are recovered typically contain up
to about 4 percent by weight rhodium after the volatile constitu-
ents have been removed. It has been difficult to separate all the
rhodium (or other noble metal) from such tars by extraction with
,
.
1~06 - 6 -
1~7i~379
acid solutions and other techniques suggested by the prior art7
We have now found that it is possible to extract the tars directly
from the carbonylation reaction mixture, or the concentrates which
are obtained when the reaction mixture is flashed, by contacting
with suitable solvents capable of selectively removing the tars
and leaving the rhodium behind for further use.
The carbonylation reaction mixture typically produces
high-boiling residues or tars which may be tolerated, but which
cannot be allowed to accumulate indefinitely since they may
reduce the reaction rate. The rate at which the tars are produced
and their composition will depend upon many factors, not fully
understood at this time. Generally, in the carbonylation of
methyl acetate to acetic anhydride, it is expected that the tar
make will be up to about S parts by weight of tar for each 1000
parts of acetic anhydride produced, but substantially greater
production of tars may occur when abnormal conditions prevail in
the reactor. Experience suggests that the tar make in the
carbonylation of methyl acetate to EDA is lower, up to about 2
parts by weight of tar for each 1000 parts of EDA. The rate at
which the tars should be removed and the level to which they are
permitted to accumulate in tne reaction mixture is established
empirically for a particular reaction system. Typically, the
reactor will be operated so that the products and other light
materials will be flashed off -- either from the entire reacting
mixture or from a slip stream which is recycled to the reàctor.
In either case, heavier materials not flashed off accumulate and a
portion of these materials is separated and then concentrated to
leave only the heaviest materials, designated as tars.
1206 - 7 -
!
i :~71~79
According to our invention the tars, i.e. the heaviest
residues, are separated from the reaction mixture or concentra-
tions thereof by a selective extraction with suitable solvents.
It has been discovered that by proper selection of the solvents
and the operating conditions that the tars can be removed and the
noble metals ~typically rhodium) remain with the lighter
materials.
Practical Application of Tar Separation by Solvent Extraction
The solvent extraction of tarry residues will be
generally considered with reference to a block diagram, Figure 1.
The reaction generally ta~es place in a pressure vessel 10 and the
reactants such as esters, ethers, alcohols and the like are
carbonylated in the presence of carbon monoxide with or without
hydrogen being present, in the presence of a noble metal catalyst
and organic and/or metallic promoters. The tar~ produced can be
tolerated in a reaction vessel to only a limited extent since they
may reduce the reaction rate and may reduce the volume available
for the carbonylation reaction. It will be determined empiricall
for any reaction system, what level of tar can be tolerated.
Typically, the tars must be purged in some manner in order to
maintain the selected concentration. Tnis could be done by eithe~
periodically or continually purging the reaction system. In
either case, the purge stream containing tars would contain many
other compounds as well as noble metal catalyst which must be
removed before the tars can be disposed of. In the diagram, a
stream of the reactor contents is withdrawn via line 12 and
flashed to s o er pressure Erom which products and other light
1206 - 8 -
ll
il71h79
materialS may be separated for recovery. In one mode carrying out
the reaction, this stream 12 would represent a withdrawal of all
the products of the reaction. The flash would produce a vapor
stream containing all of the products and by-products. Alterna-
tively, the stream 12 may represent a periodic or continual small
purge from the reactor, if it is operated in such a manner that
products are continually vaporized from the reactor itself via
optional line 13. In such an operation, vapor would be withdrawn
from via line 13 the reactor 10 and combined with the vaporized
material in line 15 from th,e flashed purged stream.
It will be appreciated that the liquid remaining after
such flashes will contain the heavy tarry residues as well as the
noble metal catalyst and the promoters. Also, the liquid will
contain a certain amount of valuable products and other light
materials which should be recovered. This tar-containing material
then ls stream 16, which will be subjected to solvent extraction
accordlng to the invention in order to separate the tars from the
catalyst and promoters and insofar as possible from the reaction
products and by-products.
As will be seen, a large number of solvents may be used,
although practical considerations will govern the actual selection
of the solvent. The desired characteristics of solvent(s) which
are selected include the following:
1. The solvent must remove proportionately a larger fraction
of the tars than of the noble metal catalyst present in the purged
stream. This characteristic is critical to tne selective separa-
tlon of the t and the noble meta1.
1206 ~ 9 ~
!l I
li~79
2. The solvent should take up all species of tar compounds
wbich may be present. A selective build up of particular types o
tars should be avoided, if possible.
3. The solvent should remove a minimum of the reactor
products and by products.
4. Physical separation of the tar-containing solvent phase
from the remainder of the mixture should be easily done. That is
the solvent and the flashed liquid should be substantially
immiscible.
5. The solvent should ~e easily separated from the residual
reaction products and by-products which are extracted along with
the tars. This characteristic is important to minimize the
recirculation and build up of these reaction compounds in the
extraction system.
r~ 6. The solvent should be chemically un-reactive with respect
to the carbonylation reactants and products.
As the block diagram shows, a selective solvent or
solvents is contacted ~18) with tne tar-containing stream.
Methods of carrying out such extractions are well known in genera~
to those skilled in the art. rrypical of the techniques which
would be considered is mixing of the solvent and the tar-contain-
ing stream followed by settling and separation, in one or more
stages. Continuous countercurrent e~traction in tray or packed
towers would also be considered as a potentially useful method.
Other types of equipment or variations of those generally dis-
cussed would be studied by those skilled in the art to make a
final selection of the equipment to be used.
It is assumed for purposes of the diagram that a separa-
tion is made into two distinct product streams, the first being a
recycle stream (20), which contains any unextracted tars, reactio~
120~ - 10 _
1~71~37S~ I
products and by-products, and noble metal catalyst and promoters,
along with a limited amount of the solvent. Such a stream may be
directly recycled into the reactor or it may be further treated
prior to reuse in the reactor. Typically, sufficient solvent
could be present in this stream so that separation of the solvent
is required to avoid a build up of solvent in the reactor system
or undesirable interactions witn reaction products or by-products.
The tar-containing solvent stream (22) will be sent to
separation facilities (24) which typically would involve evapora-
tion of the solvent and recycle to the extraction system via line
26. The concentrated tar stream 28 would be disposed of, typi-
cally by incineration.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that
this broad outline of the application of the invention necessaril~
includes many alternative routes ,to carrying out the process of
the invention. ~he proper selection of the solvent or solvent
mixture, the mode of carrying out the extraction and the extent tc
which the tar and catalyst are separated made would require care-
ful analysis in a specific carbonylation system. For example, th~
extraction might be carried out in sequential extractions in whic~
different solvents are used, if such was found to be desirable to
optimize the separation for a particular application. Separation
of the solvent from reactor products to avoid adverse effects on
the carbonylation reaction may be important in some applications.
Once those skilled in the art become aware of the selective ex-
traction with a solvent or solvent mixture of the tars formed in
carbonylation reactions preferentially leaving behind the noble
metal catalyst, a number of alternative schemes will suggest them
selves for consideration in applying the invention. Preferred
processes are disclosed and claimed in commonly-assigned
1206 ~ 11 ~
1:lL71879
Canadian application Serial No. 401,855 ~y R. Porcelli (attorney
docket No. 1211).
Preparation of Carboxylic Acid Anhydrides
The process for the preparation of an anhydride of a
monocarboyxlic acid in general comprises carbonylation of a
carboxylate ester (RCOOR) or an ether (ROR) under substantially
anhydrous conditions in the presence of a Group VIII noble metal
catalyst and a halogen. ~he R's may be the same or different and
each R is a monovalent hydrocarbon radical or a substituted
monovalent hydrocarbon radical wherein any substituent is inert.
Of particular interest, acetic anhydride can be effect-
ively prepared by carbonylating methyl acetate or dimethyl ether
under a moderate CO partial pressure in the presence of a Group
VIII noble metal catalyst and iodides or ~romides. Other alkanoic
anhydrides, such as propionic anhydride, butyric anhydrides and
valcric anhydrides, can be produced Dy carbonylating the corres-
ponding lower alkyl alkanoate or a lower alkyl ether.
Pre~aration of Ethvlidene Diacetate
~ he preparation of ethylidene diacetate comprises con-
tacting (a) methyl acetate and/or dimethyl ether, (b) carbon
monoxide, and (c) hydrogen with a source of halide comprising a
bromlde and/or an iodide, within a reaction zone under substan-
tially anhydrous conditions in the presence of a Group VIII noble
metal catalyst effective to promote the formation of ethylidene
diacetate. Although the process could be carried out in the vapor
phase, liquid phase operation is preferred and ~ill be described.
1206 - 12 -
,
lt'71 ~379
The overall reaction can be expressed by the following
chemical equation:
2 methyl acetate + 2CO + H2 -> ethylidene diacetate + acetic acid
When dimethyl ether is used as the reactant in lieu of
methyl acetate, the overall reaction can be expressed by the
following chemical equation:
2 dimethyl ether + 4CO + ~2 -> ethylidene diacetate + acetic acid
Co-products are often obtained such as acetic anhydride
and/or acetaldehyde. The nature and distribution of these co-pro-
ducts depends in large measure upon the ratio of carbon monoxide
to hydrogen employed, as well as other reaction variables.
When using dimetnyl ether as tne organic raw material it
is believed that the initial step involved is the carbonylation of
the ether to produce methyl acetate. This may be done in a
separate reaction zone. However, the use of a separate reaction
zone is not necessary because the conversion of dimethyl ether to
methyl acetate can be carried out concurrently with and in the
same reaction zone as that in which the ethylidene diacetate is
formed. While hydrogen is a necessary co-reactant with carbon
monoxide for the production of ethylidene diacetate, it is not a
necessary co-reactant for the conversion of dimethyl ether to
methyl acetate.
The molar ratios of carbon monoxide plus hydrogen to
dimethyl ether and/or methyl acetate employed are dictated by the
partial pressure criteria set forth below, since partial pressure ¦
and liquid phase concentration of these normally gaseous reactants
are directly i errelated.
, 1206 - 13 -
,; 1,
.,
1 1 71 ~ 9
Once the reaction has been carried out, the reaction
effluent is withdrawn from the reaction zone and distilled.
Ethylidene diacetate and co-product acetic acid are recovered and
unconverted or partially converted materials and halogen-contain-
ing components of the reaction medium are recovered for recycle to
the reaction zone. The catalyst can also be readily recovered
for recycle to the reaction zone.
Reaction Conditions
In carrying out the reactions, a wide range of tempera-
tures, e.g. 20 to 500-C, are suitable but temperatures of 100 to
300-C are preferably employed and tne more preferred temperatures
generally lie in the range of 125 to 250C. The reaction is
carried out under superatmospheric pressure and employing a carbon
monoxide partial pressure which is preferably 0.35 to 140.6
kg/cm2, and most preferably 1.76 to 70.3 kg/cm2, although
carbon monoxide partial pressures of 0.007 to 1055 kg/cm2 can
also be employed. The partial pressure of hydrogen present, if
any, will be consistent with the desired carbon monoxide pressure
and the ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide as discussed
hereinafter. The total pressure is preferably that required to
maintain the liquid phase.
The Group VIII noble metal catalyst, i.e., iridium,
osmium, platinum, palladium, rhodium and ruthenium, can be
1206 - 14 -
l l
1.~71E79
supplied in the zero valent state or in any higher valent form.
For example, the catalyst to be added may be the metal itself in
finely divided form, or as a metal carbonate, oxide, hydroxide,
bromide, iodide, chloride, lower alkoxide (methoxide), phenoxide
or metal carDoxylate wherein the carboxylate ion is derived from
an alkanoic acid of 1 to 20 carbon atoms. Similarly complexes of
the metals can be employed for example the metal carbonyls, such
as iridium carbonyls and rhodium carDonyls, or as other complexes
such as the carbonyl halides, e.g., iridium tri-carbonyl chloride
[Ir(CO)3cl]2
or the acetylacetonates, e.g. rhodium acetylacetonate
Rh(CsH702)3
Pre~ormed ligand-like complexes can also be employed, such as
dichloro bis-(triphenylphosphine) palladium, dichloro bis-(tri-
phenylphosphine) rhodium, and trichloro tris-pyridene rhodium.
Other forms in which the catalyst (as rhodium) can be added to th
system include, aside from those already s2ecifically listed,
rhodium oxide (Rh203), tetranodium dodecacarbonyl,
dirhodium octacarbonyl, hexarhodium hexadecacarbonyl
(Rh6(C0)16), rhodium (II) formate, rhodium (II) acetate,
rhodium (II) propionate, rhodium (II) butyrate, rhodium (II)
valerate, rhodium (III) naphthenate, rhodium dicarbonyl
acetylacetonate, rhodium trihydroxide, irdenylrhodium dicarbonyl,
rhodium, dicarbonyl (1 - phenylbutane - 1,3 - dione),
tris(hexane-2,4 - dione) rhodium (III), tris(heptane - 2,4-dione)
rhodium (III), tris(1 - phenylbutane-1,3 - dione) rhodium (III),
tris(3 - methyl-pentane - 2,4 - dione) rhodium (III), and tris(1
cyclohexylbutane - 1,3 - dione) rhodium (III).
.
..
~ ~ 1206 ~ 15 ~
-` 1171879
; The noble metal catalyst can be employed in forms
initially or eventually soluble in the liquid phase reaction
medium to provide a homogenous catalyst system. Alternatively,
insoluble ~or only partially soluble) forms, providing a
heterogeneous catalyst system, can be employed. Amounts of
carbonylation catalyst (calculated as contained noble metal based
upon the total quantity of liquid phase reaction medium) of as
little as about 1 x 10~4 wt. % (1 ppm) are effective,
although normally amounts of at least 10 ppm, desirably at least
25 ppm, and preferably at least 50 ppm would be employed. An
optimum balancing of reaction rate and economic criteria would
normally suggest the use of amounts of contained noble metal
carbonylation catalyst based upon the total weight of liquid phas
reaction medium between about 10 and about S0,000 ppm, desirably
between about 100 and 25,000 ppm, and preferably between about 50
to 10,000 ppm.
Activity of the Group VIIl noble metal catalysts des-
cribed above can be signiicantly improved, particularly with
respect to reaction rate and product concentration, by the con-
current use of a promoter. Effective promoters include the
elements having atomic weights greater than 5 of Groups IA, IIA,
IIIA, IVB, VIB, the non-noble metals of Groups VIII and the metal
of the lanthanide and actinide groups of the Periodic Table. Pre-
ferred inorganic promoters include the metals of Groups VIB and
the non-noble metals of Group VIII, especially chromium, iron,
cobalt, and nickel and most preferably chromium. Particularly
preferred are tne lower atomic weight metals of each of these
groups, i.e. hose having atomic weight6 lower than 100, and
1206 -16-
` ~ 11718'79
especially preferred are the metals of Groups IA, IIA and IIIA.
In general, the most suitable elements are lithium, magnesium,
calcium, titanium, chromium, iron, nickel and aluminum. The
promoters may be used in their elemental form e.g. as finely-
divided or powdered metals, or they may be employed as compounds
of various types, both organic and inorganic, which are effectiv
to introduce the element into the reaction system, such as oxides
hydroxides, halides, e.g. bromides and iodides, oxyhalides,
hydrides, alkoxides, and the like. Especially preferred organic
compounds are the salts of organic monocarboxylic acids e.g.
alkanoates such as acetates, butyrates, decanoates and laurates,
benzoates, and the like. Other compounds include the metal
alkyls, carbonyl compounds as well as chelates, association
compounds and enol salts. Particularly preferred are the
elemental forms, compounds which are bromides or iodides, and
organic salts e.g. salts of the mono-carboxylic acid correspond-
~ng to the anhydride being produced. Mixtures of promoters can b~
used, if desired, especially mixtures of elements from different
Groups of the Periodic Table.
The quantity of the promoter can vary widely, but pre-
ferably it is used ~n the amount of 0.0001 mol to 100 mols per
mol of Group VIII noble metal catalyst, most preferably 0.001 to
10 mols per mol of catalyst.
In the working up of the reaction mixtures, e.g. by dis
tillation, as discussed above, the promoter generally remains wit
the Group VIII noble metal catalyst, i.e. as one of the least
volatile components, and is suitably recycled or otherwise handle
along witn the catalyst.
."
1206 - 17 -
117~ b~79
Suitable organic promoters are non-hydrocarbon material~ ,
capable of forming a coordination compound with the Group VIII
noble metal catalyst,, containing within their molecular structur~ ,
one or more pairs of electrons available for formation of coordin-
ate bonds with the noble metal catalyst. Most such organic
promoters can be characterized as Lewis bases for the particular
anhydrous reaction system involved. Sucn promoters can be
introduced concurrently with the reactants to the reaction zone
can be incorporated together with the Group VIII noble metal by
formation of ligand complexes with the noble metal prior to
introduction of the noble metal-ligand complex to the reaction
zone.
Suitable organic promoters are organo-phosphine, organo-
arsine, organo-stibine, organo-nitrogen, and organo-oxygen con-
taining compounds. Organo-phosphine and organo-nitrogen promoter~
are preferred classes.
Suitable oxygen-containing compounds capable of func-
tioning as organic promoters in this system are those containing
functional groups such as the phenolic hydroxyl, carboxyl,
carbonyloxy and carbonyl groups. Suitable organo-nitrogen con-
taining compounds are those containing &mino, imino and nitrilo
groups. Materials containing both oxygen and nitrogen atoms can
; be used.
Illustrative organic promoters of the types mentioned
above may be found in ~ritish Patent 1,538,782.
The quality of organic promoter employed is related to
the quantity of noble metal catalyst within the reaction zone.
Normally the quantity is such that at leas~ 0.1,, desirably at
1206 - 18 -
Il I
1171~79
least 0.2, and efersbly at least 0.3 mol of promoter compound
per mol of noble metal is present in the reaction zone. Preferably
less than 100 mols of promoter per mol of noble metal catalyst
would be used.
It will be understood that metallic and organic
promoters are not exclusive. Eitner, or both, may be included as
is found to be preferred for particular applications.
Carbon monoxide and hydrogen preferably employed in
substantially pure form, as available commercially. However,
inert diluents such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, methane, and/or
inert ~ases (e.g., helium, argon, neon, etc.) can be present.
For the reactions of particular interest, all reactants
should be substantially free from water since, in this fashion,
the maintenance of a substantially anhydrous condition within the
reaction zone is facilitated. (It may be noted that, generally
speaking, the presence of water may be desirable in other carbony-
lation reactions where the products contain hydroxyl groups). The
presence o~ minor amounts of water, however, such as may be found
in these commercially available reactants, is permissible. Nor-
mally, however, the presence of more than 5 mol ~ of water in any
i one or more of the reactants should be avoided, tne presence of
less than 3 mol % of water is desired, and the presence of less
than 1.0 mol ~ of water is preferred. More important, however,
than the amount of water in feed or recycle streams introduced to
the reaction zone is the concentration of free water plus
alcoholic hydroxyl groups (which react in situ to form water)
present within the reaction zone. In practice, the molar ratio of
(s) wster plus he molar equivalents o slconolic hydroxyl groups
1206 ~ 19 ~
~ . 1*7~379
to ~b) the number of mols of dimethyl ether and/or methyl acetate
within the reaction zone is the most convenient method for defin-
ing this concentration. On this basis, this ratio preferably
should not exceed 0.1:1. Still lower values for this ratio are
advantageous, with optimal results being obtained with values for
this ratio ranging from zero to 0.05:1.
Solvents or diluents can be emplo~ed, preferably
materials which are indigenous to the reaction system and/or
co-products commonly found in the reaction system. Excess
dimethyl ether and/or methyl acetate are the preferred reaction
diluents, with acetic acid being the preferred alternates. It is
also practicable to employ organic solvents or diluents which are
inert in the environment of the process. The most suitable inert
solvents or diluents are hydrocarbons free from olefinic unsatura-
tion, typically the paraffinic cycloparaffinic, and aromatic
hydrocarbons such as octane, benzene, toluene, the xylenes and
cyclododecane. Other suitable solvents include chloroform, carbon
tetrachloride, and acetone.
The reaction to form carbo~ylic anhydrides requires the
presence of a halide, which would be a component of the liquid
phase reaction medium. Suitable halides are either bromide or
iodide or mixtures thereof, iodide being preferred. The halide
wouid ùsually ~e present largely in the form of methyl halide,
acetyl halide, hydrogen halide, or mixtures of the foregoing
species, and could be introduced to the liquid phase reaction
medium as such. However, these materials may be formed in situ,
by using inorganic halide materials, e.g., salts such as the
~alkali metal a a1kaline oarth metel selts, as well as elemental
1206 - 20 - !
, li I
.,
~71! ~3~79
iodine and bromine. In continuous operation, wherein reaction
by-products are separated and recycled to the reaction medium,
organic halides such as methyl halide will be present as compo-
nents of the liquid phase reaction medium and can be recovered an
recycled to the reaction zone as such; thus, only a small quantit~ ,
of make-up halide need be supplied to compensate for such losses
in recovery as may be encountered.
The amount of halide that should be present in the
liquid phase reaction ~edium is related to the amount of ether
and/or ester reactant introduced to the reaction 20ne, but other-
wise can vary over a wide range. Typically, O.S to 1,000 mols of
ester and/or ether per equivalent of halide, desira~ly 1 to 300
mols,~ g~iv7alent, and preferably 2 to 100 mols per equivalent
are used. In general, higher proportions of halide to ether
and/or ester reactant tend to increase reaction rate.
' It has been found that molar ratios of carbon monoxide
to hydrogen, broadly within the range of 1:100 to 100:1, desirably
within the range of 50:1 to 1:50, and prefèrably within the range
of 10:1 to 1:10 can be employed. Best results are obtained with
carbon monoxide-hydrogen mixtures which approach the stoichiome-
tric ratios of carbon monoxide to hydrogen. Molar ratios of
carbon monoxide to hydrogen within the range of 0.5:1 to 5:1 are
thus an especially preferred''regime of operation.
The following example will illustrate a carbonylation
process which produces heavy residues containing substantial
amounts of rhodium.
,. ... ...
1206 - 21 -
li71~
Example 1
A four liter autoclave was operated continuously to
produce acetic anhydride Dy the carbonylation of methyl acetate.
The reactants, i.e. methyl acetate, methyl iodide, carbon monoxid
and hydrogen are added continuously. ~he product acetic anhydrid~
is obtained as a vapor by flashing a withdrawn stream of the
reacting mixture. The remaining liquid is recycled to the reac-
tor. The reaction is catalyzed by the mixture of rhodium tri-
chloride trihydrate, and lithium iodide, which are added to the
inital charge placed in the autoclave in amounts sufficient to
provide about 0.01 mol Rh/liter of liquid in the vessel and 50 mo:
Li/mol Rh. The reaction is operated at about 180C, 54.8
kg/cm2 absolute, with partial pressures of about 35 kg/cm2
CO and about 5.6 kg/cm2 l~2- The liquid recycled after
flashing contains about 4 wt % methyl iodide, 7 wt % methyl
acetate, 32 wt % acetic anhydride, 24 wt % acetic acid, with about
1-2 wt ~ heavy residues. A slipstream is withdrawn from the
recycle stream at a rate sufficient to maintain the residues in
the autoclave at an acceptable level. The tar-containing liquid
whlch remains after the gases have been separated is treated with
solvents to remove the tar content while excluding the rhodium.
Example 2
The tar-containing liquid from Example 1 includes about
1-2 wt % tars, along with a mixture of the reactants and prod-
ucts. The tar portion is separated for testing by contacting a 1
gm sample with about 25 mls of methanol and refluxing at atmos-
pheric pressu_e for about one hour, then removing the volatile
1206 - 22 -
1171~79
portion of the mixture at 50C and a vacuum below 10 mm Hg. The
resulting viscous material is dissolved in 10 ml of acetone. A 5
ml aliquot of the resulting solution is added to a 500 ml separat
ing funnel and dried with nitrogen. Then, 20 ml of methylene
chloride and 40 ml of aqueous 10% HCl are added to the separatory
funnel and vigorously shaken. Two phases separated. The aqueous
upper layer contains the soluble rhodium and is retained. The
lower organic layer contains the tar and is drained into a second
500 ml separatory funnel containing 40 ml of aqueous 10~ HCl. Th
extraction is repeated and the lower layer drained into an 8 oz
glass bottle. A fresn 20 ml portion of methylene chloride is
added to the first separatory funnel and the procedure repeated
w~th the methylene chloride being drained into the 8 oz bottle.
~ or solvent testing, 4 ml aliquots of the tar-contain-
ing methylene chloride are added to 6 dram vials and the methylen
chloride evaporated by heating to 35-40-C in the presence of a
stream of nitrogen. A 1 ml aliquot of the solvent to be tested i
added to the vial and sha~en~ Thereafter, the vial is, centri-
fuged to remove suspended solids. The liquid portion is analyzed
for tar by gel permeation chromatography using a two column bank,
refractive index detector, and computerized area integration. The
columns were 500 A u~ Styragel and 100 A u~Styragel supplied by
Waters Associates, Milford, Massachusetts. The mobile phase was
methylene chloride. The amount of rhodium extracted was measured
by atomic absorption spectroscopy. The results of a series of
tests with va ous solvents ere given in the following table.
120~ - 23 -
~17t~375~ 1
Table I
Solvent ~ Rh Extracted_ % Tar Extracted
hexane 2.2 20
cyclohexane 5.8 23
methylene chloride S4 100
carbon tetrachloride 1.7 19
toluene 6.3 45
ethyl ether 22 83
isopropanol 57 (a)
ethanol 77 (a)
ethyl acetate 68 100
acetonitrile 81 84
(a) values above 100 measured due to solvent interference --
visual appearance indicated that substantially all of the tar
solids were dissolved.
Preferred solvents would be those which extract very
little rhodium, but significant amounts of the tars. Of those
tested, hexane, cyclohexane, carbon tetrachloride, and toluene
would be representative of classes of solvents which are most
likely to be successfully used to extract tars. The remaining
so1vents appear to extract more rhodium than desirable, but they
might still be useful if extraction of a larger amount of tar was
desired and if the rhodium is recovered from the solvent;
''
Example 3
In Example 2, batch extraction of tar is from an
immobile residue remaining af~er removal oi volatiles, lithium,
I
~ ll
1206 - 24 -
i7~
and part of the rhodium and iodine by aqueous HCl. However, a
liquid-liquid extraction can be performed directly from the
flashed reaction liguid. For such an extraction a solvent must be
able to form a second phase when contacted with the tar containing
liquid, and have reasonable tar solubility and minimal catalyst
solubility. One suitable solvent is cyclohexane.
, Cyclohexane is tested in various volume ratios of
solvent to flashed reaction liquid of Example 1. The tar content
in the reaction liquid is about 4.5%. Cyclohexane is contacted
with flashed reaction liquid in a closed vessel. The mixture is
shaken for 10-15 minutes, then centrifuged to remove any suspended
material. An aliquot of the cyclohexane phase is removed and
dried to constant weight at 50-C and <10 mm Hg vacuum. The
residue was analyzed for rhodium and lithium by atomic absorption
spectroscopy. The total amount of tar and catalyst extracted was
calculated. The results are listed in Table II.
Table II
Volume of
Volume of Flashed
Cyclohexane Reaction% Rhodium % Lithium % Tar
(ml) ~iquid (ml) ExtractedExtracted Extracted
0.03 0.14 22
-- -- 22
0.04 0.13 30
-- -- 24
0.05 0.29 26
-- -- 26
0.06 0.41 29
2 0.06 0.07 36
2 __ -- 34
1206 - 25 -
11 1
1~ 11'73~79
Example 4
In contrast to Examples 2 and 3, which were batch
extractions, a continuous countercurrent extraction is carried
out on a flashed reaction liquid, containing acetic anhydride,
reactants, and by-products where the tar content is determined to
be about 2.5 wt percent. A second continuous extraction is
carried out on a sample of unflashed reaction liquid, in which the
tar content is about 1.9 wt percent. The heavies-containing
liquids are fed into the top of a cylindrical extraction column
2.5 cm id. and 64 cm long and having three 2.4 cm impellers 10 cm
apart on a central shaft driven by a tor at 600 rpm. Cyclohexane
is fed into the bottom of the column and passes upward countercur-
rently to the heavies-containing liquid. Analysis OL the two
phases after contacting shows the following results.
Table III
Removed by cyclohexane
Cyclohexane Tar-Containing as percent in feed
Test Rate, cc/hrLiquid, cc/hr Rh Tar
1 100 100 0.09 29.3
2 90 60 0.06 20
, The results of Table III show that cyclohexane can
; remove substantial amounts of tne tars contained in the liquid
feed while leaving the rhodium behind. It snould be be noted tnat
the tars need not be completely removed since in a practical
application only sufficient tars to correspond to the amounts
being produced must be removed to maintain a constant level in
the reacting mixture. Further, the relative amount of solvent
used and the conditions of the extraction would be adjusted to
optimize the removal of tars while minimizing the loss of rhodium ¦
to nearly zero.
:, ,
."
'~ 1206 - 26 -
~ ' 1~71~7~ . I
The results presented illustrate that tar and rhodium
can be separated by choice of a proper solvent. Batch extraction
of tar residue remaining after aqeuous acid extraction of lithium
and some rhodium was shown to be successful to varying degrees
depending on solvent chosen. Suitable solvents include alkanes,
cycloalkanes, halogenated alkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons.
More generally, the solvents may be cnaracterized as Delonging to
selectivity groups I, VIb, and VII as defined by Snyder, Journal
of Chromatograpny, 92, 223-230, 1974, plus tne alXanes and
cycloalkanes which are not assigned to a group by Snyder.
Liquid-liquid extraction of tar dir~ctly rrom reactor
effluents requires solvent immiscibility with the effluent.
Solvents best suited are alkanes or cycloalkanes. In addition,
alkanes or cycloalkanes doped with a stronger tar removing solvent
and still producing a second phase may extract more tar.
,
¦l 1206 - 21 -
I, .
" .
