Language selection

Search

Patent 1188534 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1188534
(21) Application Number: 412047
(54) English Title: HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF COMBATING UNDESIRED PLANT GROWTH
(54) French Title: HERBICIDE ET METHODE DE LUTTE CONTRE LES MAUVAISES HERBES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 71/8.2
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 47/30 (2006.01)
  • A01N 47/36 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RAVEN, CLIVE A. (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • SHELL CANADA LIMITED (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1985-06-11
(22) Filed Date: 1982-09-23
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
8131592 United Kingdom 1981-10-20

Abstracts

English Abstract






ABSTRACT

"HERBICIDAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF COMBATING UNDESIRED
PLANT GROWTH"

A herbicidal composition which comprises 1-benzothiazol-2-
yl-1,3-dimethylurea (the herbicide methabenzathiazuron) together
with 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


- 8 -
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A herbicidal composition which comprises 1-benzothia-
zol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea (compound I) together with 3-(3-methyl-
4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (compound II).


2. A composition as claimed in claim 1, which also includes
one or more carriers.


3. A composition as claimed in claim 1, wherein the weight
ratio of compound I to compound II is from 1:50 to 50:1.


4. A method of combating undesired plant growth at a locus
which comprises applying to the locus a herbicidally effective
amount of 1-benzothiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea (compound I)
together with 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea
(compound II).


5. A method as claimed in claim 4, in which compound I and
compound II are applied in the form of a composition.


6. A method according to claims 4 or 5 wherein the weight
ratio of compound I to compound II is from 50:1 to 1:50.


7. A method according to claim 5 wherein the composition
also includes one or more carriers.


- 9 -

8. A method as claimed in claim 4, in which the locus
treated is a crop area bearing plants or seeds of cereals.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


53~




K 1850 CAN

"HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION ND METHOD OF COMBATI~G UNDESIRED
PLANT GROW~H''

This invention relates to herbicidal compositions and method
of combating undesired plant growth.
l-Ben70thiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea is useful as a herbicide,
and is sold under the common name Metha'oenzthiazuron.
U.K. Patent Application No. 2064537 discloses that the
compound 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1~1-dimethylurea is
effective in the control of weeds.
~he Applicants have now found that mixtures of methabenzthia-
zuron with 3-(3-methyl-4~isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea
exhibit an unexpected synergistic effect against broad-leaved
weeds .
The invention therefore provides a herbicidal composition
which comprises the compound 1-benzothiazol-2-yl-1,3-dime-thylurea
(hereinafter referred to as compound I) together with 3 (3-
methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)--]~1-dimethylurea (hereinafter referred
to as compound II).
The invention further pro~ides a method of combating un=
desired plant growth at a locus, which comprises applying to the
locus compound I and compound II.
The weight ratio of compound I to compound II may vary
widely depending on the intended application. Preferably said
ratio i9 in the range of from 1:50 to 50:1, preferably 1:20 to
20:1, especially 5:1 to 1:5. Suitably the dosage of each com-

5~


pound applied i5 in the range o~ from 0.05 to 5 kg/ha. For
example, a dosage of O.3 to 4 kg/ha o~ compoun~ I may be applied
to~ether with 0.3 to 3 kg/ha o~ compound II.
The composition and method o~ the in~ention may be used ~or
the control o~ weeds in a wide variet~ o~ crops, for example,
cotton, soyabean, plantation crops such as sugar cane or vines 9
and, especially, cereals such as wheat, barley, maize and sorghum.
A wide range o~ broad leaved and grassy weeds are controlled.
Application may be pre-emergence or, preferably, post-emergence.
For certain applications, especially when resistant weeds are
present, it may be desirable also to apply a third herbicide.
For example, i~ severe infestations o~ wild oat are presen-t in
cereal crops, it may be advantageous to apply along with compound
I and compound II, one o~ the ~,N-disubstituted alanine derivatives
which are specialised narrow spectrum herbicides and described in
~.K. Patent ~o. 1,164,160, for example the ethyl ester of N-
benzoyl-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-2~aminopropionic acid, or the
racemic mixture or laevo rotato~ isomer o~ the methyl or isopropyl
ester of N-benzoyl-N-(3-chloro-4-~luorophenyl)-2 aminopropionic
acid or a broad-spectrum herbicide such as a triazinea ~or
example cyana~ine, atra%ine or simazine. Further suitable
compounds which may be present as a third component include
metolachlor, chlortoluron, isoproturon and dichlofopmethyl,
phenoxyalkanoic acids such as dichlorprop, mecoprop, 2,4--D, 2,L~-
DB, MCPA and MCPB and their salts and es-ters, and compounds o~
the ~eneral ~ormula: C~


xl ~x2
OH
or salts or esters thereo~ in which each of Xl and x2 independ~
ently represents an iodine, bromine or chlorine atom. Examples
o~ the latter include bromoxynil and iGxynil and their respective
octanoa-tes.

i3~


A composition according to the invention preferably also
comprises one or more carriers. A carrier i8 any material with
which the active ingredients are formulated to facilitate appli-
cation to the locus to be treated, or to facilitate storage~
transport or handling. A carrier may be a solid or a liquid,
including a material which is normally gaseous but which has been
compressed to form a liquidg and any of the carriers normally
used in formulating herbicidal compositions may be used.
Suitable solid carriers include natural and synthetic clays
and silicates, for example natural silicas such as diatomaceous
earths; magnesium silicates, for example talcs; magnesium alumin-
ium silicates, for example attapulgites and vermiculites~ alumin-
ium silicatesg for example kaolinites, montmorillonites and
micas; calcium carbonate; calcium sulphate~ syn-thetic hydrated
silicon oxides and synthetic calcium or aluminium silicates;
elements, for example carbon and sulphur; natural and synthetic
resins, for example coumarone resins, polyvinyl chloride, and
styrene polymers and copolymers; solid polychlorophenols; bitumen;
waxes~ for example beeswa~9 paraffin wax, and chlorinated mineral
wa~es; and solid fertlisers, for example superphosphates.
Suitable liquid carriers include water; alcohols, for example
isopropanol and glycols, for example acetone, methyl ethyl ketone,
methyl isobutyl ketone and cyclohexanone; ethers; aromatic or
araliphatic hydrocarbons, for example benzene, toluene and xylene;
petroleum fractions, for example kerosine and li~ht mineral oils;
chlorinated hydrocarbons, for example carbon tetrachloride,
perchl.oroethylene and trichloroethane. ~ix-tures of different
li~uids are often suitable.
Agricultural compositions are often formulated and trans-
ported in a concentrated form which is subsequently diluted bythe user before application. ~he presence of small amounts of a
carrier which is a surface-active agent facilitates this process
of dilution.
A surface-active agent may be an emulsifying agent, a dis-
persin~ agent or a wetting agent; it may be nonionic or ionic~

i3~


~amples of suitable surface-active agents include the sodium or
calcium salts of polyacrylic acids and lignin sulphonic acids;
the condensation products of fatty acids or aliphatic amines or
amides containing at least 12 carbon atoms in the molecule with
ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide; ~atty acid esters of
glycerol, sorbitan, sucrose or pentaerythritol; condensates of
these with ethylene oxide and/or propylene oxide; condensation
products of fatty alcohol or alkyl phenols, for example ~-
octylphenol or ~-octylcresol, with ethylene oxide and/or propylene
oxide; sulphates or sulphonates of these condensation products,
alkali or alkaline earth metal salts, preferably sodium salts, of
sulphuric or sulphonic acid esters containing at least 10 carbon
atoms in the molecule, for example sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium
secondary alkyl sulphates, sodium salts of sulphonated cas-tor
oil, and sodium alkylaryl sulphonates such as sodium dodecyl-
benzene sulphonate; and polymers of ethylene oxide and copolymers
o~ ethylene oxide and propylene oxide.
The compositions of the invention may for example be formu-
lated as wettable powders, dusts, granules, solutions, em~sifi-
able concentrates, emulsions, suspension concentrates and aero-
sols. Wettable powders usually contain 25, 50 and 75% ~r o~
active ingredient and usually contain, in addition -to solid inert
carrier, 3-10% w of a dispersing agent and, where necessary, 0
10% w of stabiliser(s) and/or other additives such as penetrants
or stickers. Dusts are usually formulated as a dust concentrate
having a similar compositions to that of a wettable powder but
without a dispersant, and are diluted in the field with f~rther
solid carrier to give a composition usually containing ~-10% w of
active ingredient. Granules are usually prepared to have a size
between 10 and 100 BS mesh (1.676 - 0.152 mm), and may be manu-
~actured by agglomeration or impregnation techniques. Generally,
granules will contain ~-25% w active ingredient and 0-10% w of
additives such as stabilisers, slow release modifiers and binding
agents. Emulsi~iable concentrates usually contain~ in addition
to a solvent and, when necessary~ co~solvent, 10-50% w/v active

53~


ingredient, 2-20~ w/v emulæifieræ and 0-20~ w/v of other addi-
tives such as stabilisers1 penetrants and corrosion inhibitors.
Suspension concentrates are usually compounded so as to ob-tain a
stable9 non-sedimenting flowable product and usually contain 10-
75% w active ingredient, 0.5-15% w of dispersing agents, 0.1-
10% w of suspending agents such as protective colloids and thixo-
tropic agents, 0-10% w of other additives such as defoamers,
corrosion inhibitors, stabilisers, penetrants and stickers, and
water or an organic liquid in which the active ingredient is
substantially insoluble, certain organic solids or inorganic
salts may be present dissolved in the formulat;on to assist in
preventing sedimentation or as anti-freeze agents for water.
Aqueous dispersions and emulsions, for example compositions
obtained by diluting a wettable powder or a concentrate according
to the invention with wa-ter, also lie within the scope of the
present invention. The said emulsions may be of the water-in-oil
or of the oil-in-water type, and ma~ have a thick 'mayonnaise'-
like consistency.
The compositions of the in~ention may also contain other
ingredients, for example, compounds poæsessing insecticidal or
~ungicidal properties.
The followine Example illustrates the invention.
Exam~~
~ 1e tests conducted were foliar spray tests, in which seed-
ling plants o~ broadleaved weeds were sprayed with a formulation
containing the test compound. The test plant species were
speedwell and black nightshade.
The soil used in the tests was a prepared horticultural
loam. The seedlings had 2 to 4 true leaves.
The formulations used in the tests were prepared by diluting
with water, solutions of the test compound or mi~ture in acetone
containing 0~4% b~ weight of an alkylphenol/ethylene oxide -
condensate available under the trade name TRIT0~ X-155. The
acetone solutions were diluted with an equal volume of wa-ter and
the resulting formulations applied at 4 different dosage levels

3~
,


designed to produce a range of responses. Three replicate pots
were used for each treatment. Untreated seedlings plants were
used as controls.
12 days after treatment, phytotoxicity compared with the
untreated control, was assessed visually on a 0 to 9 scale, 0
indicating no effect and 9 indicating death.
The results were subjected to a standard probit analysis by
computer to calculate the dosage of each compound or mixture~ in
Kg/ha, re~uired to kill 50% of the test species. This dosage is
referred to as the GID50 dosage. If a mixture of herbicides A
and B act together in an additive way, one would expect the GID50
values for A and B in the mixture to be given by the equations
(i) and (ii) below:

GID50 ~ B in mixture = a
o~ + a (i)
b




GID50 of A in mixture = (GID50 of B in mixture)x C~ (ii)

where a = GID50 of A used alone

b = GID50 f B used alone
CX = ~Jeight ratio of compound A to compound B in
mi~ture.

If the measured GID50 values are in fact less than the
calculated values, the mixture is synergistic.
The results of the tests are given in the Pollo~ing Table.
~ The GID50 values are actual, measured values in kg/hag and
; calculated values are given in brackets after -the measured
values~ In the Table, the follo~ing abreviations are used:

A: 3-(3-methyl-4-isopropylphenyl)-1,1-dime-thylurea.
B: l-Benzothiazol-2-yl-1,3-dimethylurea the commercial
herbicide methabenzthiazuron.
.

s~


The results show that the mixtures tested showed signi*icant
s~nergism against both speedwell and black nightshade.

TABLE OF RESULTS

_ _ _ __ _ ., _ __ ___ ~ _ _ r~ ,
Speedwell
Mixture GID50
Ratio
A:B A B
. ~ . ___._________ . ..... __ _
1:00.62(0.62) 0(0)
32:10.34(0.42) 0.010(0.013)
16:10.25(0.32) 0.016(0.020)
8:10.18(0.22) 0.022(0.027)
4:10.084(0.13) 0.021(0.033)
0:1 _ ~ 0.042(0.042)

Black Nightshade
MixtureGID50
Ratio
A:B A B

1:00.014(0.014) 0(0)
4:10.018(0.013) 0.004(0.003)
2:10.014(0.013) o.oo7(o.oo6)
1:10.005(00012) 0.005(0.012)
1:20.003(0.010) 0.006(0.019)
0:1 _ -- - _ _0.059(0.059)

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1188534 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1985-06-11
(22) Filed 1982-09-23
(45) Issued 1985-06-11
Correction of Expired 2002-06-12
Expired 2002-09-23

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1982-09-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELL CANADA LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1993-06-10 1 9
Claims 1993-06-10 2 36
Abstract 1993-06-10 1 10
Cover Page 1993-06-10 1 19
Description 1993-06-10 7 302