Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
BACKGROUND O~ THE IN~ENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to easily mixed and readily
spreadable lO~Yo reactive ~luid adhesive compositions
based on acrylic core/shell polymers, non-flammable
vinyl monomers, peroxide free radical generators and
polymerization accelerators. These compositions
display Bingham plastic rheology as well as low odor
and toxicity and are useful in joining metallic
surfaces as well as for bonding high pressure plastic
laminate to wood and wood-derived products.
2. Brief Description of the Prior Art
Although many combinations of monomer, polymer, and
polymerization catalysts have been proposed as 100~
reactive fluid adhesives, frequently inherent in such
2~ adhesive compositions are two serious problems. First,
if a low molecular weight monomer is used to facilitate
the dispersion or solution of the polymer, the monomer
frequently contributes odor, flammability, and toxicity
to the adhesive composition. On the other hand, if a
relatively hi~h molecular weight monoMer is chosen, it
is very often a poor dispersing medium or a poor
solvent for the polymer. Mixing such compositions
tends to be difficult and dangers arise from the
flammable monomer if heat is applied to help disperse
the polymer or is developed in the course of the
dispersion process.
Once they have been mixed, such polymer-in-monomer
compositions often have a rubbery, stringy, or ropy
consistency which makes them difficult to spread. This
consistency results from the solubilization of the
polymer by the monomer and concomitant generation of
the polymer chain entanglement "crosslinks" associated
with a variety of viscoelastic phenomena. ~xamples of
--2--
such odorous and fla~able or difficult to prepare
compositions are described in U.S. Patents No.
3,832,274 (methyl methacrylate and nitrile rubber),
4,052,2~4 (hydroxypropyl acrvlate and acrylic rubber).
3,644,569 (styrene and polyurethane), 33890,407 (methyl
methacrylate ancl chlorosulfonated polyethylene),
~,22~,95~ (lauryl methacrylate and chlorosul~onated
polyethylene) and 4,126,504 tacrylic rubber, methyl
methacrylate and acrylic acid).
lOO% reactive adhesive compositions comprising a
thermoplastic, non-reactive elastomeric polymer
dissolved in an addition polymerizable combination of
acrylic or methacrylic monomer and a free radical
polymerization catalyst system are well known in the
art. For example U.S. Patent No. 4,126,504 granted
November 21, l978 to Wolinski et al. describes such a
composition. However, this type of composition suffers
from the limitation that the monomer or monomer mixture
must be chosen such that the non-reactive thermoplastic
polymer will be soluble therein. This limitation
restricts the use of the high flash point monomers. In
the instant invention the polymer forms a separate
phase dispersed rather than dissolved in the monomer
mixture which is polymerized on curing the adhesive.
Consequently, high flash point monomers may readily be
used.
In addition to the difficulties associated with
their preparation, several of the prior art
compositions, especially those containing
chlorosulfonated polyethylene or polyvinyl chloride,
may tend to corrode metallic substrates. For example,
corrosion results from the presence of the sulfonic
acid groups on the polymer chain in the case of the
chlorosulfonated polyethylene compositions. Similarly,
corrosive hydrogen chloride may be produced from
--3--
dehydrohalogenation of polyvinyl chloride based
adhesive compositions which are used in automobile
product;on, since high temperature bake cycles are
often required to cure coating applied subsequent to
adhesive applicRtion.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
One of the objects of this invention is to provide
easily mixed and readily spreadable 100% reactive
adhesive compositions which exhibit low odor,
flammability~ and toxicity and are useful for joining
metal surfaces to each other. Another object of this
invention is to provide l00~ reactive adhesive
compositions with low toxicity, flammab;lity, and odor
useful when joining high pressure plastic laminate to
wood or wood derived products. Yet another object of
this invention is to provide adhesive compositions of
low toxicity, fla~mability, and odor useful for joining
plastic to plastic. Another object of this invention
is to prepare 100% reactive adhesive compositions
exhibiting good impact resistance when cured. Another
object of this invention is to prepare articles
manufactured from a high pressure plastic laminate
adhered to a wood or wood derived product substrate
with a 100% reactive adhesive composition displaying
low flammability, odor, and toxicity. Yet another
object of this invention is to provide adhesive
compositions for metal substrates which will not tend
to corrode such substrates because of the presence of
strongly acidic components. These and other objects
which will become apparent below are met by this
invention which comprises at least one monomeric ester
of acrylic or methacrylic acid havin~ a flash point
greater than about 95C and such that the corresponding
homopolymer or copolymer has a glass transition
~ 3,~
temperature (Tg) from about 0C to about lO0OC, at
least one dispersible core/shell pol~mer having an
elastomeric core and a glassy shell at temperatures
Prom about t0C to about 70C, at least one compound
which thermally dissociates at some temperature from
about 0C to about 100C to yield peroxide or
hydroperoxide free radieals, and optionally at least
one amino polymerization accelerator. In addition to
use as adhesives, the compositions of this invention
are useful in preparing protective coatings for
metallic, plastic, and wood surfaces.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The adhesive compositions of this invention are
comprised of
a) at least one monomeric ester of acrylic or
methacrylic acid having a flash point greater than
about 95C such that the corresponding homopolymer or
copolymer has a Tg from about 0C to about 100C,
b) at least one dispersible core/shell polymer
having an elastomeric core and a glassy shell at
temperatures from about 10C to about 70C,
c) at least one compound which thermally
dissociates at some temperature from about 0C to about
100C to yield peroxide or hydroperoxide free radicals,
and
d) optionally at least one amino polymerization
accelerator.
The useful acrylate and methacrylate ester monomers
are characterized by flash point of greater than about
95C as measured by ASTM D-32-78 Set-a-Flash Closed Cup
Method. The useful monomers or blends thereof are
further characteri2ed as yielding homopolymers or
copolymers with Tg's of from about oC to about
100C. Preferably such monomers are
acryloyloxypropionic acid (AOPA),
- 5
acryloyloxypropoyloxyproplonlc acld (A02PA)g and the
correspon~in~ hlgher oligomers of the formula
CH2=cHco2(cH2cH2co2)nH
where n is greater than 2 (AOnP.~s)3 as well as dlcyclo-
pentenyloxyethyl methacrylate (DCPOEMA) (which is descrlb-
ed in U.S~ Patent No. 4,097,677), hydroxypropyl methacry~
late (HPMA), and isodecyl methacrylate (IDMA).
The polymers useful in this inventlon are multi-
stage core/shell polymers as those descrlbed ln U.S,
Patents No. 3~678~133, 3,985,703, 3,985,70ll, 4,200,5~7 and
~306~040, These core/shell polymers are comprised of a
crosslinked acrylic or butadiene-based first stage polymer
wlth a T8 of less than about 10C. Thls firs~ stage poly-
mer is graft-linked to an outer rlgid thermoplastic
stage. Additional alternating stages of soft and hard
phase may then be subsequently graft-linked to the initial
two phase polymer partlcles. This rigid stage has a Tg of`
greater than about 70c. Preferably the core/shell poly-
mer Gontains from about 25% to about 95% by welght of a
composition of the first stage rubber and from about 75%
to about 5% by weight of the flnal rigld stage. The poly-
mers are further characterized as free f'lowing, readily
dispersed powders whlch can be stirred into the monomers
wlthout heat or excessive agitation. Examples of the
core/shell polymers that are useful in thls lnvention are
in Table 1. The abbreviations used in Table l to signify
particular monomers are explained in Table 20 In the
polymer compositions given in Table 1, a slngle slash (/)
between abbreviations is used to denote components of a
3n single stage and a double slash (//) is used to separate
the compositions of the soft and hard phases.
.,
J~
_ ~,
~ U~ C C~
G '~
C`7 C~
C~, co . X
U~ ~ . O ~. U~ U~ U~ ~-1 ~ CJ~ O N N N C
0
~ C~l ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ C~ ~ e~ C~ ~ c~ c~ C~ ~ C`l ~ C~
.. .... ~r
~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ¢ ~
~ ~ ~ ¢~¢ ¢ ¢ ~ ¢ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~ 3~ 3~ 33~ ~ ~ ¢ 3~ ¢
~ oo ~ o _I C ~ ~ U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ c~ c~ c~ c~ ~ c~
--7--
TABLE 2: MONOMER ABBREVIATIONS
BA = n-butyl acrylate
EA = ethyl acrylate
EHA = 2-ethylhexyl acrylate
BDA = l,3 butylene d;acrylate
BGDMA = 1,3 butylene dimethacrylate
AIMA = allyl methacrylate
St = styrene
MMA = methyl methacrylate
LMA = lauryl methacrylate
A~ = acrylonitrile
DAL~ = diallyl maleate
PBT = poly(butylene terephthalate)
BD = butadiene
AA = acrylic acid
].5 DMAEMA = dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate
AAM = acrylamide
~IEMA = 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
PET = poly(ethy`ene terephthalate)
DVB = divinyl benzene
The ratio of monomer to core/shell polyrner is
preferably from about 50 to about 90 weight percent
monomer to about 50 to about 10 weight pereent
core/shell polyrner respectively.
The peroxy free radical generating compounds are
preferably benzoyl peroxide (BPO), cumene hydroperoxide
(CHP), t-butyl perbenzoate (TBP), and t-butyl
hydroperoxide (TBH). The amount of free radical
generating compound is preferably between 1 and 4
weight percent of the adhesive composition.
The optional amino polymerization accelerators are
preferably N,N-dirnethylaniline (DMA), N,N-dimethyl-p-
toluidine (r~), N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-p-toluidine
(HET), and condensates of butyraldehyde and aniline or
butylamine availahle from R. T. Vanderbilt Company under
the trade mark Vanax as Vanax ~Oo and Vanax 833 respec-
t-lvely. The weight of accelerator is preferably between 2
and ~I weight percent o~ the adhesive composition.
The free radical generator or the accelerator or
both may be present in the bulk of` the adhesive
corn~osltior~ lowever, it is preferred that only one of
either the free radical generator or the accelerator be
present in the bul~ of the aclhesive and that the other be
applied to one or both of -the substrates to be adhered
prior to the application of the bulk of the adhesive
composition. This is preferable in order to lengthen the
s-torage stability of the adhesive composition. When solid
free radical generators are used as surface-activators,
that is, when they are applied to the surface or surfaces
of the substrates and the optional accelerators included
in the bulk of the adhesive composition, it is preferred
that the solid free radical generators be dissolved or
dispersed in chlorinated solvents such as methylene
chloride or in plasticizers such as dibutyl phthalate.
~s used throughout the specification and claims of
this application
"acrylic monomer" means an ester of` acrylic or
methacrylic acid,
"free radical generator" means a compound which
contains a peroxide or hydroperoxide group,
"amino polymerization accelerator" includes
compounds selected from the group consisting of N,N-di(C1-
C6)alkyl and N,N-di mono hydroxy-substituted (C1-CI~)alkyl-
arylamines and condensates of butyraldehyde and aniline
and condensates of butyraldehyde and butylamine.
The adhesive compositions of this invention can be
made by sifting core/shell polymer powders into monomer
while stirring the monomer at room temperature~ All
_9_
other components of the adhesive composition can then
be added with continued stirring.
E~MPLE 1
Into a monomer mixture consisting of 35 parts by
weight of the total composition of hydroxypropyl
methacrylate, 25 parts by weight of
dicyclopentenyloxyethyl methacrylate, lO parts by
weight of acryloyloxypropionic acid, is sifted 30 parts
by weight of core/shell polymer No. 22 of Table 1 flbove
with mechanical stirring. Subsequently, 3 parts per
weight of cumene hydroperoxide was mixed into the
composition. Prior to application, a thin coating of
Vanax 808 was spread over both surfaces to be joined.
EX~MPLES 2-11
In a similar manner Examples 2-11 of Table 3 were
prepared.
METALLIC SUBSTRATE ADHESION.
Lap shear test joints were prepared from 25mm x
102mm x 1.6mm test coupons of steel (No. RS-l4 from Q-
Panel Company) and aluminum (No. AD-13 from Q-Panel
Company). Vanax polymerization accelerators were then
spread thinly over the area of the test sur~aces to be
joined. Adhesive compositions were pressed by hand
between the treated surfaces to give a bond measuring
25mm x 13mm x 0.25mm. Subsequent to room temperature
polymerization, the test specimens formed in this
manner were tested for lap tensile shear strength at a
separation rate of l.3mm per min. by ASTM Method D
1002-72. These tests were made after various aging
periods at room temperature or under other
conditions. Similar test specimens were prepared and
tested for impact resistance by ASTM Method Gl4-77
(Falling Weight Test).
Examples 1-11 of Table 3 indicate that the
adhesive compositions of the present inv2ntion are
- 1 0 ~
useful for adhering metal to metal. In general, 2,000
psi (14 ~a) is accepted in the art as an adequate
level of lap tensile shear strength. Examples 5 and 6
significantly exceed this level. Example 113 prepared
without core/shell polymer, but including a small
amount of fumed silica for thickening, indicates that
without a core/shell polymer far less strength is
exhibited.
A comparison of the lap shear strength on aluminum
after 4 weeks in 38C water of Example S with Example 7
suggests that the hydrophobic monomer DCPOEMA tends to
impart water resistance to the adhesive bond.
A comparison of the impact resistance of Examples 5
and 7 with that of 99 10, and 11 indicate that
inclusion of a significant amount of core/shell
polymer, here 30%, imparts impact resistance to the
adhesive bond. A falling ball impact resistance of 72
in.-lb. (8N-m) is art-recognized as adequate. The
impact resistances of Examples 5 and 6 exceed this
level.
The physical form of these compositions is known as
a Bingham plastic which is charaeterized by a yield
stress. Yield stress is significant in the application
of adhesive compositions. An upper limit of yield
stress defines spreadability, and a lower limit defines
the condition for preventing leakage of the adhesive
from the parts being joined. Consistencies between
mayonnaise and butter are preferred.
Yield stress was measured with a Brookfield Model
RVF Viscometer by the method described by Bowles et al
on p. 140 in the November 1955 issue of Modern
Plastics, Example 2 in Table 3 has a yield stress of
2100 Pa. Examples 16 and 18 in Table 5 below have
yield stresses of 1500 and 2800 Pa. respectively.
-11-
E~AMPLES 12-15
It is often necessary when adhesive compositions
are to be used in parts assembly that an adhesive bond
strong enough to allow handling of the assembled parts
be ormed quickly. Rapid formation of the bond tends
to eliminate the necessity of clamplng the parts
together thus simplifying the assembly operation and
ultimately reducing costs. The time required for an
adhesive bond to form between the parts to be assembled
is called the fixturing time. Examples 12-15 of Table
4 compare the lap tensile shear strength on steel after
short periods of aging of the adhesive compositions of
Examples 5-8. A comparison among the examples
indicates that a wide range of variation in fixturing
time can be obtained with the compositions of this
invention. For example the tensile shear strength at
10 minutes of Example 12 is about 10 times greater than
that of Example 13. The significant variation in
fixturing time is desirable because in some
applications it may be important to have adequate time
to position and reposition parts before a bond eures.
In such cases a relatively slowly polymerizing adhesive
is preferred.
]
o ~ o c~l
._ I ~ ~ I _ a~ I ~ ~
e,~ CD a~ o c~;
~ CD O C~
c~ ~ oo
~ c~
~r c o
col ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ X
,._ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ o C~
O I O C O ~ I I ICr~ CJ~
~r
C~l C oo ~D
~ ccl c~ l x ~
o cc~ O ~ ~ O O a~
o
I_ o ~ ~ o U~
~ OtD Cl~
O I ~ o U~ ~ I I O ~ C`l
~ '~1 ~ I ~ C`l I X I
U2 cn o~
~t~ o ~ ~
L o I ~ ~ O c~ CD --
~ '`~
e~ ~ C~ G~ O
c~
o I U~ ~ o C~ I I ~ o ~ C~
E-~ o O c~
Z; ~ ) o
a) o ~ a~ c
r-~ ~ C ~J ~'~
~ ~ o -- ~ -- C
O ~; ~ O ~ S
._ C ~ O ~
.~ bl ~ d
~ ~ 5~ C; ~ 4~ ~ C ~
0 3 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 c~ ~-- C~l
~ ~ ~ _ 0 ~ 0,_ c~
C;J ca ~ C v~ C 3 v2 C4 u~ C~ C C Z D I _
1) ~ O a~ - o C~ V ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~
:~ ; S S ~ , ~ 3
._ 0 u~ ~ ~ c,o
~n ~ ~ X Xo~ 3 c~
o _ ~ ~ ¢ 5.~ ~ ~ 0
1. .
X c~ u7 a~
r
~ u~
~ c~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~cc CD
tD N
C~
C`~ In C ~ l O CO
C
C
b,"~V Cl~
~)
_~
~ 0c~ ~ ~ c c ` ~
G._ ~ c~ c~ c~
,,6,~
--14~
E~PLES 1 ~- 1 9
Adhesive bonds made to illustrate lap shear and hot cleavage
resistance between Formica (Formica is a registered trademark of
the ~nerican Cyanamid Campany) high pressure plastic laminate and
particle board or plywood were made fran coupons of plastic
laminate measuring 25mn x 7~m x 1.25~m and pieces of particle
board rneasuring 76rm x L5~nn x 1~nn or plywood measuring 7~m x
152rrm x 6rrm. N,N-dirnethyl-p-toluidine surface-activator was
spread thinly over the back side of the plastic laminate and over
one side of the particle board or plywood. The adhesive
cnpositions of Exarrples 16-19 were prepared as described in
Exarnple 1 above and were spread on the activated surface of the
particle board or plywood at about 75gfrn2. The activated side of
the plastic laminate was then pressed by hand onto the adhesive to
forrn a bonded area of 25mn x 2~nn. In the first few minutes after
forming the bond, a slight shearing action was imposed by hand to
deterrnine the fixturing time. After aging 4 days at 25C the
plastic laminate was clamped in one jaw of a tensile tester and
the particle board or plywood was clarr~ed in the other jaw. The
lap shear resistance was deterrnined at a separation rate of
51Tmhni n .
Test specimens for hot static cleavage resistance were
prepared as deser ibed above except that the bonded area between
the plastic laminate and plywood was 25mrn x SlTm. These test
specimens were suspended horizontally in an oven at 70C with a
plastic larninate coupon on the under side and a 500 g weight
h~Lnging frcm the free end of the coupon. The time required for
the pl as t i c coupon p lus we i ght to f al l was recorded .
Exarnples 16-L9 of Table 5 shaw that the lap shear adhesion of
these adhesive c~npositions was greater than about 200 psi (1.
NlPa). 200 psi is recognized as an adequate level of lap shear
adhesion for this application. The sdme examples also show
substantial resistance to cleavage failure at 70C.
-- L r,,_
r- ,- ~ -~ ~ ~ OD C`~ C9 ~ O
~ ~ r ~r c~ o c~
c.~ ~
I a~
_co o o ~r ~ u~
C~
I o ~r ~
~ ~ CO ~ ~1 ~ X ~ C~l ~D ~ ~
~ c~ ~
o
E~ ~D CD C~'
8 co o o ~r ~ u~
~ ~ If~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
c~
o
.. ~c~
% o D 3 ~
C;5
e~ .
O S ._
C ~ S ~ ,~
~
o ~ ~ ~ O _ _
~, 2 O ~ ~, ~t Q
~ _ ~ ~ ~ Q"Q~ ~ ,~
. ; :~ r ~ ~ ~, . .
r Q ~
-16-
EX~VPLES 20-23
Examples 20-23 of Table 8 indicate that the adhesive compositions
of Fxamples 16-l9 are useful for adhering flexible
polyvinylchloride (PVC) sheet to rigid acrylonitrile~butadiene-
styrene (~BS) copolym~r sheet. ~ne inch wide strips of each
substrate were wiped with N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine. The adhesive
was subsequently spread on the AES sheet and mated by hand to the
PVC sheet. After about 24 hours the ndhered strips were peeled
apart at an angle of 180 in a separation rate of 25cm/min.
according to AST~ Method D 903-49.
TABLE 6: ACHESICN OF PVC TO AES ~k~l
~xampleAdhesive Composition Peel Resistance
No.of Exa le No. (from Table 5~lb/in N/m
r~
16 3.1 545
21 17 8.2 1443
22 18 2.0 352
23 19 5.3 933
