Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~Z~.G6g~
PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PARTICULATE NOVOLAC
RESINS AND AQUEOUS DISPERSIONS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Fie1d of the Invention
This invention relates to a process for producing
particulate novolac resins, and the novolac resins so
produced. The production of stable aqueous dispersions of
novolac resins is also provided.
Description of the Prior Art
The prior art has disclosed procedures for preparing
stable aqueous dispersions of heat-hardenable, resole phenolic
resins, such as in U.S. Patent 3,823,1~3 (Harding).
Procedures have also been utilized for the preparation of
particulate resole resins isolated from aqueous bispersions,
such as those described in U.S. Patent 4,206,095 (wynstra et
al.). These processes produced resole resins more efficiently
and safely than other prior art processes. Also, since the
product is in the particulate state, intensive grinding is not
required.
It would be desirable if a similar procedure could be
developed for the preparation of particulate novolac resins,
as opposed to the production of particulate resole resins as
described in the prior art. There exists, however,
significant differences between the two basic types of
phenolic resins, i.e., novolacs and resoles, as are well known
to those skilled in the art. If the phenolic resins are
prepared with an excess of formaldehyde and an alkaline
catalyst, the produc. will possess methylol side or end
groups, and can be referred to as resoles or one-stage
phenolic resins. The resole resins can be cured with heat
through the condensation of the methylol groups, without the
addition of curing agents. If, however, the phenolic resins
are prepared with an acidic catalyst and less than a mole of
formaldehyde per mole
12920
~2~66~;~
of phenol is utilized, the resin will be a phenol-ended chain
polymer in which the phenolic gro~ps are connected with
methylene bridges located ortho and para to phenolic hydroxyl
groups, will h~ve the properties of being permanently soluble
~ 5 and fusible, and will cure only upon the addition of a curing
agent. Since the addition of a curing agent is requirea,
these novolac phenolic resins have been referred to as
two-step resins. These differences in chemical structure,
production methods, and physical properties make it difficult
to predict whether certain procedures effective for the one
type of resin/ would be effective when applied to the other
type.
Utilizing the procedures described for the production
of particulate resoles, it was initially believed that
producing and isolating novolac resins in particulate form
from a suspension polymerization would be easier for the
novolac than for a resole. This assumption is based on the
fact that novolac resins have a higher glass transition
temperature, and are therefore more sinter resistant. The
novolac resins are also not heat reactive, as opposed to
resole resins, such that the drying procedure should be less
critical. In addition, it was believed that the novolac
resins should be more hydrophobic than the resole resins since
the novolac resin is higher in molecular weight and does not
contain methylol groups. It was discovered, however, that
some of these assumptions are incorrect. For example, novolac
resins were found to be more hydrophilic than the resoles
produced by the particulate process. As a result, the no~olac
resin particles in aqueous dispersion would require the
special handling as with the particulate resoles. It was also
discovered that since the molecular weight of the novolac ~as
higher than the resole, the tendency to form fine particles
was actually less because of the higher melt viscosity. ~t
would, therefore, be desirable if a procedure could be worked
12920
- ~Z~66g7
out which overcomes these difficulties to thereby produce a
viable, particulate novolac resin.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a process for
producing particulate novolac resin comprising the steps of:
(a) condensing a phenol with an aldehyde in the presence of a
catalyst under acidic conditions, to produce a novolac resin;
(b) adding water before, during or after the condensation
reaction in step (a) to provide a novolac resin/water mixture;
(c) neutralizing the acid catalyzed novolac resin using a
base; (d) forming a particulate novolac resin dispersion by
adding an effective amount of protective colloid to the
aqueous mixture; and (e) isolating the particulate novolac
resin from the aqueous dispersion. The invention also relates
to a particulate novolac resin produced by this process, as
well as a particulate novolac resin in an aqueous dispersion
comprising (1) the acid catalyzed condensation product of a
phenol and an aldehyde; (2) a neutralizing agent; (3) a
protective colloid; and (4j sufficient water to produce a
resin-in-water dispersion.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The invention resides in the discovery of an
effective process for the production of particulate novolac
resin and aqueous dispersions. The procedures for the
particulate novolac resin production include condensation to
produce phenolic resin, addition of a required amount of water
to enable subsequent dispersion formation, neutralization of
the condensed resin, par~iculate dispersion formation using a
protective colloid, and isolation of the particulate resin.
It was also dis-overed that dephenolation to remove unreacted
phenol cou1d , e particulate novolac resin isolation. The
particulate nc l resin and aqueous
12920
~LZ1~6~7
dispersions that may be produced by these processes can
exhibit desirable physical properties within a wide range of
values, depending upon the particular end utilization of the
particulate novolac product.
Condensation
The novolac phenolic resins, used to produce the
aqueous dispersion and particulate resin of the present
invention, are obtained by condensing a phenol with an
aldehyde in the presence of an acid catalyst.
The phenol reactant can be a tri-functional phenol,
such as monohydroxybenzene, m-cresol or resorcinol, or a
tetra-functional phenol, such as
2,2-bis(4-hydroxy-phenol)-propane ("bisphenol-A").
Para-substituted phenols such as a p-cresol, p-chlorophenol,
and p-t-butylphenol, can also be used as well as other
halogenated phenols. Preferred phenolic components include
monohydroxybenzene, m-cresol and bisphenol-A.
Examples of aldehydes which can be condensed with the
phenol listed above to produce the phenol-aldehyde resins
are: formaldehyde in any of its available forms, i.e.,
formalin and paraformaldehyde; furfural and the like. The
amount of aldehyde is generally about 0.6 to about 0.9 moles
per mole of phenolic component, preferably about 0.75 to 0.85
moles per mole of phenolic component.
The condensation of the phenol and aldehyde is
carried out in the presence of a catalyst under acidic
conditions. When the condensation is carried out in an
aqueous reaction medium, faster reaction rates are observed
with the stronger acids having lower pH's. Water, formed
either by condensation or added to enable formation of a
dispersion, e~ -ts an inhibiting effect on the reaction, and
thus is a detr lent in a particulate novolac process where the
final resin is Jspended in a continuous aqueous phase. To
assist the condensation
12920
lZ~669~7
reaction to proceed rapidly9 "micellar" type catalysis of
novolac resins is preferred. "Micellar" catalysis utilizes a
catalyst compound or surfactant assisting compound which has a
structure capable of aiding interaction between the catalyst
moiety and the reactants. Under this process, it was
previously discovered that sodium xylene sulfonate was found
to enhance the rate of oxalic acid catalysis of novolac
resins. It has been found, however, that another catalyst
system works exceedingly well, which employs a catalyst such
as an alkylated diphenyl oxide that has been converted to a
sulfonic acid or a corresponding salt. (when a salt is usea,
an acid, such as H2504, must be added to supply the
necessary hydronium ions, i.e., to provide acidic
conditions.) These type of compounds have the general
structure of:
R ~ C ~ R' (I)
S03M S03M
wherein R and R' are alkyl groups, preferably dodecyl, and M
is hydrogen or a cationic equivalent, such as an alkali or
alkaline earth metal. The preferred micellar catalysts are
the dodecyl diphenyl oxides that have Deen converted to the
sulfonic acid or its corresponding sodium salt. These
compounds correspond to the structure in ~ormula I for when R
and R' are dodecyl and M is hydrogen or sodium, respectively.
These compounds, as well as other Formula I compounds, are
available from the Dow Chemical Company under the trade name
Dowfax. Illustrative of suitable alternate catalysts include
sulfuric acid, oxalic acid, and phenol sulfonic acid, in
addition to the sodium xylene sulfonate and Dowfax compounds
listed above.
Dilution
A resin/water mixture is formed through the addition
1 ~9?n
12~L~i697
.
of water to the reaction mixture. The water can be added at
any time before, during or after the condensation reaction.
In a preferred embodiment, the condensation reaction is
carried out in a principally organic medium. When the
reaction is completed, water may be added. The minimum amount
of water that should be used is that proportion which will
permit the formation of a phenolic resin-in-water dispersion
during the particulate formation step. While the minimum
amount of water needed will vary somewhat from one formulation
to another, as a rule at least 50 parts by weight of water
should be provided for 100 parts by weight of phenolic resin.
The weight of phenolic resin is equal to the weight of phenol,
aldehyde, plus any other reactants charged to the reaction
medium, minus the amount lost as water of condensation. A
moderate excess over the minimum amount of water is
recommended. There is no advantage to using a large excess,
which is undesirable because reactor productivity will be
reduced, although the process will be operable with a large
excess of water. If water is not added prior to or auring the
condensation reaction, it is preferred that water be a~aed
before the condensed resin would cool or harden to a solid
mass.
Neutralization
It was found that acid catalysis degrades or
inactivates a protective colloid which is present during the
condensation step such that particulate resin is not formed.
Therefore, in order to form the novolac resin particles, the
reaction must be neutralized prior to the additon of the
protective colloid compound. Neutralization can be
accomplished by the addition of a base, such as soaium
hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, or its equivalent. The
amount of base used to effect neutralization is approximately
an equivalent amount to the acid used to generate the acid
conditions present during the condensation reaction. It is
preferred that the base is
12920
6~9~
added in an amount sufficient to raise the pH to between about
5 to about 9, and most pre~erably to between about 6 to about
8.
Particulate Formation
In order to achieve particulate novolac resin
formation, an effective amount of protective colloid is added
to the resin subsequent to the neutralization step. It was
discovered that the protective colloids useful for the
production of particulate phenolic novolac resins are certain
polysaccharides. Other materials used as protective colloids
in the production of phenolic resole resins, such as partially
hydrolyzed polyvinly alcohol, hydroxyethyl cellulose an~
carboxymethyl cellulose dia not produce a particulate phenolic
novolac resin. It was a completely unexpected discovery that
not all the protective colloids used in the production of
particulate resole resin are useful for the proauction of
particulate novolac resin. The effectiveness of protective
colloids in the proauction of particulate novolac and resole
resins is summarized in Table 1 below.
12920
~L21669'7
TABLE 1
EFFFCT VENESS OF PROTECTIVE COLLOIDS
Novolac Resole Resole Dispersions
- Protective Colloid Yes No Yes No _Yes _ No
Gum Arabic x x x
S Gum Ghatti x x x
Gum Tragacanth x x x
Guar Gum x x x
Hydroxpropyl Guar x x x
Hydroxyethylcellulose x x x
Carboxymethyl-
cellulose x x x
Methylcellulose x x x
Methylhydroxypropyl
Cellulose x x x
Hydroxypropyl
Cellulose x x x
Polyvinylpyrollidone x x x
99 /0 Hydrolyzed
Polyvinyl alcohol x1 x x
88 /0 Hydrolyzed
Polyvinyl alcohol x x x
1Fused on cooling.
In some instances, it was discovered that certain protective
colloids which had not been effective for achieving resole
particle formation were effective for achieving novolac
particle formation. In other instances, it was discovered
that certain protective colloids which were not effective in
achieving novolac particle for~.ation were effective in
achieving resole particle formation. ~f those materials
evaluated, the materials that were effective for the
production of particulate novolac resins ~ere the
polysaccharides, such as gum arabic, gum ghatti, gum
tragacanth, and guar gum and its
12920
- - 121669~7
hydroxypropylate derivative. There is at present no
systematic explanation for the "effecti~eness" of the
particular protective colloids used in the formation of
particulate resole and no~olac resins. It is believed, that
~ 5 more is involved than simply surface activity and ionic versus
nonionic character.
The effective amount of protective colloid will ~ary
depending on the particular protective colloid utilized, the
presence of a surfactant, the molecular weight of the novolac
resin, as well as the mean particle size which is desired.
Generally, about 0.1 to about 5 weight percent based on the
amount of condensed resin, preferably about 0.5 to about 2
weight percent, and most preferably about 1 to about 2 weight
percent of protective colloid is used.
Dephenolation
It was discovered that particulate novolac resin is
difficult to recover when unreacted phenolic component is
present in the resin in an amount of approximately 6 to 8
percent or more. This unreacted phenol causes a lowering of
the glass transition temperature of the particles sufficient
to cause the resin to fuse during subsequent isolation
procedures. Particulate novolac resin WdS obtained, however,
by instituting a dephenolation step process. After
dephenolation, a higher glass transition temperature, anG more
sinter resistant particulate novolac resin is formed which
would be readily isolated by subsequent procedures. The
dephenolation step is carried out after the particles have
been formed, and can encompass refluxing the reaction mixture
- under atmospheric conditions while collecting the distillate
phenol and water in a separate receiver. The phenol, of
course, may be recycled in subsequent reactions. The
distillation can be carried out with steam, or other refluxing
conditions, which minimize the time required. Distillation is
12920
~L2~9'7
normally continued until the distillate volume reaches about
20 percent of the batch volume. Make-up water or aqueous
decantate can be added to the reactor to prevent the batch
viscosity from becoming too high. The dephenolation process
is continued for a sufficient period of time in order to
remove a sufficient amount of phenol, to less than about 6
percent as compared to the condensed resin, preferably less
than 5 percent, and most preferably 2 to 4 percent, such ~hat
effective particle isoldtion can be achieved. Where the
particulate novolac resin is not to be isolated from the
dispersion, or where the formaldehyde factor is greater than
about .8, or under such conditions that unreacted phenol is
already present at less than 6 percent, the dephenolation
procedure may not be necessary.
lS It should be noted that if the dephenolation step is
conducted before the particulate formation step, it would not
be possible to obtain as small a particle size as in the a~ove
described process due to the higher melt viscosity of the
dephenolated resin thereby exhibiting greater resistance to
particulate formation.
Isolation
The particulaee novclac resin may be isolatea using
any kn~wn ~anner for isolating suspended ~articles from an
aqueous dispersion. Such isolation can include
filtration and drying, such as the use of vacuum filtration to
obeain a cake containing 15 to 20 percent of moisture and
then drying, e.g., using a rotary evaporator or fluid bed
dryer, to obtain less than 3 percent moisture.
Ad juvants
Additional materials can be added to the reaction
mixture, such as surfactants, antifoaming agents, lubricants,
anti-caking additives, pigments, fillers, novolac hardners,
and the like, in amounts well known to those skilled in the
art.
12920
~216697
Reaction Conditions
-
The condensation step may be conducted in about 1 to
6 hours, and preferably 2 to 4 hours, at a temperature of
about 80 to 100 C, and preferably 9S to 100 C. The
condensation will usually occur at atmospheric pressure
although increased pressure may be utilized to permit the
application of higher temperatures and therefore faster
reaction rates. The dilution step should be carried out as
rapidly as possible, but while maintaining a temperature
greater than 80 C, and preferably greater than 90 C. The
particulate formation step shou1d be carried out under the
same conditions as the dilution step, and may be combined with
the dilution step once the mixture has been neutralized. The
particulate formation step is most preferably conducted at a
temperature greater than 95 C. The neutralization step is
conducted over a period of time to avoid the rapid addition of
base, using a base concentration of preferably at least 5
weight percent, but preferably no more than 25 weight
percent. The time required will typically be abcNt one hour,
with the temperature kept at greater than 80 C, and preferably
greater than 90 C. If magnesium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide,
or other alkaline earth compound is utilized, it i5 usually
added as a slurry of about 10 to 25 weight percent, and may
require more time after addition has been completed, such as
about 2 to 4 hours, to complete neutralization. The
temperature shou1d be kept at above ~0 C, and preferably above
90 C. The dephenolation step can be conducted either using
direct distillation of phenol/water, or, more preferably,
using steam distillation. The dephenolation will usually take
abou~ one-half to 4 hours, with 1 to 2 hours being preferred
for maximum efficiency and control. The dephenolation is
conducted at atmospheric pressure, and will not readily
undergo increased pressure while retaining effective
distiTlation. The
12920
~ 21669'7
filtration step will preferably utilize a reslurry or
displacement wash, however, any effective filtration procedure
known to one skilled in the art can also be utilized. The
filtration is conducted at a temperature of preferably about
5 to about 20 C, and most preferably 5 through 10 C.
Particulate Novolac Properties
The proauct of the processes described above is a
particulate novolac resin material exhibiting chemical an~
physical properties which can be analyzed using standard
procedures known to those skilled in the art, such as tripoa
flow, gel time, plate flow, nuclear magnetic resonance (N~lR),
gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and mechanical glass
transition temperature (Tg).
Novolac Dispersions
Novolac dispersions are also prepared by the process
of the present invention, and may be important in such
applications as thermal insulation. The dispersions differ
from the particulate novolac described above in that the
average particle size is about 1 to 3~, with a maximum of 50
microns. As with resole dispersions, the novolac dispersions
are maintained as aqueous, non-settling systems. Attempts to
isolate dispersions by filtration and drying are not
successful due to the fine particle size and lower glass
transition temperature of the particulate novolac resin.
21 Novolac dispersions can be made thermosetting by adding
hexamethylenetetramine, or another suitable hardener, to the
reaction product. Novolac dispersions, either with or without
added compounds, show substantially greater retention of
reactivity compared with resole resins. Resole dispersions,
in contrast, must typically be refrigerated to prevent a rapid
loss of reactivity due to chemical reactions occurring at room
temperatures, such as self-condensation of methylol groups.
The novolac dispersions of the present invention may be
12920
~LZ9~6~i9';'
prepared utilizing the same condensation, neutralization and
particulate formation steps described ahove, except that lower
forma1dehyde levels can be used, with about 0.7 to about 0.8
equivalents of formaldehyde to phenolic component being most
preferred. Effective amounts of protective colloids can
include combinations of gum systems~ such as gum arabic and
guar gum, which function extremely well in novolac resin
dispersions.
EXAMPLES
The following examples illustrate the production of
the particulate novolac resins of the present invention. The
chemical designations used in the examples are defined as
follows:
Designation Description
Antifoam I A commercial silicone antifoam
compound based on
polydimethylsiloxane.
Catalyst I H25C1 ~ ~ C12H25
503H S03H
Formaldehyde Equals the ratio of the amount of
Ratio formaldehyde present at an
in~icated time from the initiation
of the condensation reaction over
the amount of formaldehyde
initially present.
Formalin An aqueous solution containing
50 /O formaldehyde.
GPC Gas permeation chromatography
Hexa Hexamethylenetetramine
12920
121G697
14
Novolac I~ II and III Particulate novolac phenolic
resins prepared according to the
process of the present invention
as described in Example 8 b low,
with variations in the amount of
water utilized or in reaction
~ vessel size.
Novolac IV A comrnerial novolac phenolic resin
of moderate molecular weight
having a formalaehyde phenol ratio
of .79.
Novolac V A commercial novolac phenolic
resin of high molecular weight
having a formaldehyde/phenol ratio
.83.
Novolac VI A comrnercial novolac phenolic
resin of very high molecular
weight having a
formaldehyde/phenol ratio Of .84.
Phenol Monohydroxybenzene
Tg Glass transition temperature,
determined by dynamic mechanical
analysis
Example 1
The formulation in Table 2 sets forth the amount of
12920
~2~66~1
components used during the particulate novolac resin formation
procedure. The formulation was selected for convenience, and
is not necessarily an optimized formulation for any particular
end-use application.
Tab1e 2
Reaction Formulation
Component Parts, by weight Grams per 1-liter batch
Phenol 100 200
Formalin 51 102
Catalyst I 0.8 1.6
Guar gum I.O 2.0
Distilled water100 200
25 /0 NaOH 0.8 1.6
This formulation contained 0.80 equivalents of methylene per
mole of phenol. The experimental procedure is the following:
The phenol was initially weighed into a 1 liter flask
which was equipped with a motor-driven paddle stirrer, a
thermometer, and a reflux condenser. Catalyst I was added and
the mixture heated to 95 C. After this temperature is
achieved, Formalin is added to the mixture, raising the
temperature to 107 C, before stabilizing at approximately
100 C. Approximately 45 minutes after the Formalin was
initially added to the mixture, the orig-inally clear solution
became very opaque, signifying the "cloud point". The
Formalin addition was completed, and refluxing was continued.
Nearly two hours later the mixture was removed from heating,
and the 25 /0 NaOH was added to the batch with stirring for
approximately S minutes, to achieve a pH of around 7. The
Guar gum was then added, and the mixture reheated to 95 C.
Within a few minutes, a dispersion is well formed. One drop
of Antifoam I was then added to the mixture. An atmospheric
steam distillation was then begun, and continued for
approximately 1 hour, removing 363 grams of distillate and
129~0
~Z~L66~'7
16
steam condensate. The batch was then cooled in an ice bath to
approximately 15 C. The mixture was then filtered, reslurried
with 300 ml of water and filtered again in a Buchner funnel.
~ A portion of the particulate solid product was dried in a
rotary evaporator for approximately 3 hours under occasional
heating. The resulting dried resin, when combined with
10 /o hexa, exhibited a gel time (at 150 C) of 75 seconds,
and a plate flow (at 125 C) of 25 mm.
Example 2
This example illustrates the process of the present
invention without a dephenolation step. A formulation
substantially like the one in Example 1 was used, except that
the amount of Catalyst I was only 1 gram, and the protective
colloid was gum arabic instead of the guar gum used in the
Example 1. The procedure followed was substantially similar
to that in Example 1 as follows: the phenol and formalin
reactants were charged to a reaction flask; the mixture was
refluxed for approximately 4 hours; neutralized with NaOH
solution; the gum arabic was added, under continuous
agitation; the resulting particulate novolac resin was cooled,
filtered, and washed. The product consisted of large
particles of novolac resin. The particulate novolac resin wdS
allowed to air dry overnight, subjected to fluid bed drying at
room temperature up to 60 C, resulting in a product having
particles of approximately 500 to 1000 microns in size.
Analysis of the particulate novolac resin product, containing
10 /0 hexa, provided a gel time of 90 seconds and a plate
flow of 78 mm.
This example illustrates and analyzes the process of
the present invention using a dephenolation step to remove
phenolic reactant from the particulate novolac resin prior to
isolation. Substantially the same formulation of components
12920 --
~21669'7
was used as that described in Example 1, except that the
amount of Catalyst I was increased to 2.5 grams (i.e., 1.2~
parts by weight), and the guar gum was replaced by a solution
~ containing 4 grams (i.e., 2.0 parts by weight) of gum arabic
in 16 milliliters of distilled water. The procedure was
similar to the one described in Example 1 except that the
amount of caustic added during the neutralization step to
achieve a pH of approximately 7, was 2.0 grams. After the
addition of the gum arabic, steam distillation was initiated
at 100 C~ In order to avoid foaming of the mixture during
dephenolation, it was discovered that the presence of an
antifoaming agent, such as Antiform I, or that control of heat
input and steam injection kept to a minimum, would avoid loss
of the particulate solid suspension. After an hour of
distillation, the mixture was removed from heat and placed in
an ice water bath at around 15 C. One hunared milliliters of
water were added during cooling to replace the water lost
during distillation. The particulate novolac resin product
was then isolated using filtration and drying. Analysis of
the particulate novolac resin, mixed with approximately
10 /^ hexa, produced a gel time of around 90 seconds
at 150 C, and a plate flow of around 35mm at 125 C. A GPC of
the dried particulate novolac resin indicated a 4.2 /o
free-phenol content, a number average molecular weight of 5~0
and a weight average molecular weight of 19,700. The
particulate novolac resin product exhibited a Tg of 66.5 C,
determined by dynamic mechanical analysis.
Example 4
An additional experiment WdS conaucted using
substantially the formulation and procedures set forth in
Example 3, wherein samples of the p~rticulate novolac resin
were removed at various times during the dephenolation step as
shown in Table 3 below. Each sample was recovered by cooling
12920
~2~69'7
18
the sample for approximately 15 minutes in a cold water bath,
following by decanting off the aqueous solution. Distilled
water was then added and the sample was stirred for
~ appro~imately 5 minutes and again placed in a cold water bath
to allow the particulate novolac resin solids to settle.
After decanting off the water, the wet solids were placed in a
8uchner funnel to undergo vacuum filtration, followed by
drying at room temperature for approximately 30 minutes. The
results indicate that beginning with a free-phenol content of
5 /o, the disappearance o~ phenol from the resin follows
approximately first order kinetics establishing a half-time
for loss of phenol of about 1.8 hours. In other experiments,
the half-time can approach 1 hour.
Tabl_ 3
Dephenolation By Steam Distillat~on
Dephenolation Time, Phenol, Molecular Weight
hours tO Number Average Weight Average
0 5.0 680 40,600
1 3.6 760 39,800
2 2.5 860 39,300
3 1.7 970 38,70G
3.5 1.4 ~bO 37,60C
Example 5
This example was conducted using substantially the
formulation and procedures set forth in Example 3, except that
4 grams (i.e., 2 parts by weight) of gum ghatti in 40
milliliters (i.e., 20 parts by weight) distilled water, were
used in placed of the gum arahic in Example 3. The
particulate novolac resin product exhibited a tripod flow time
of 110 seconds at 150 C. When mixed with 10 parts hexa to 100
parts of resin, the particulate novolac exhibited a gel time
of 83 to 86 seconds at 150 C, and a plate flow of 32 mm at
12920
~Z~6~
13
125 C. A GPC analysis indicated 3.9 /O of free phenol, a
number averaye molecular weight of 600, and a weight average
molecular weight 23,700. An average Tg was determinea to be
68.0 C.
5: Example 6
The formulations and procedures set forth in Example
5 were followed except that gum ghatti was replaced with guar
gum. Analysis of the particulate novolac resin product
indicated a tripod flow value of 116 seconds at 150 C.
Mixtures of 100 parts resin with 10 parts hexa exhibited gel
times of between 83 to 85 seconds at 150 C, and plate flow
values of 19mm at 125 C~ A GPC indicated a 3.2 /O free
phenol content, a number average molecular weight of 610, and
a weight average ~olecular weight of 22,500. A mechanicdl
Tg value was determined to be 72.0 C.
Example 7
In this example, the relative effectiveness of
various catalysts are compared by measuring the disappearance
of formaldehyde over time, and by determining the rate
constants and half-lives for the disappearance of the
formaldehyde. The formulations and procedures are essentially
those as described in Example 1, except that the Catalyst I
was replaced, or altered in amount, as shown in Table 4 as
follows:
12920
lZ~669'7
1~ O~n DD ID
q~ ," ,77_. O
L
._ ,~ O
V ^
~ J ~ ~~ ~_ J~7
_ ~ L ~O ~_ _
, ~2 C
V
, ~1-- ~ D
O ,o i C _ ~ O O O
Y L10'~i
. n
i ~ 0 8
~ O ~ o
DI ii ~ i
I I I O
U L ¦ ~ j ~ O
V ~ E
- ~ i V
o O
C U
~, I o i ~
E
E ~I ¦ i o i i ~ -- '--
o I . II . o
. O o
_ i ~
O o ,~
V) O-- G V
~ L - ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O
, _ ~ e~
3~ ~ C
. Vl ._ ~
_ ~_ ~L U
.n
_ g i_ ~ r~J _ _ _
~ _ _ O O O
.~L'O
~ -- U
_ ~ ~ o I O
_ ~ lo O~ Oet e
_ _ _ V~
~ 1~ 1 = T
,r, O
12920
~L2~6~9'~
It can be seen that the slowes~ reactions occur when H2504
and phenolsulfonic acid are employed as the catalysts.
Addition of sodium xylene sulfonate surfactant can double this
rate. The fastest reaction rates occur when utilizing the
preferred dodecyl diphenol oxide sulfonic acid, Catalyst I 9 as
described above. The reaction rate can also be enhanced by
reducing the amount of water present, i.e., raising the level
of organics.
Example 8
Following the experimental procedure and formulation
in Example 1, the molecular weight distribution of the novolac
resin was monitored over time using gel permeation
chromatography, GPC. These results, listed in Table 5, show
that the reaction is essentially over after 4 hours. The final
free phenol content is in a range of 6 to 7 percent. This
high level causes substantial particle "plasticization" by
lowering tne glass transition temperatures, Tg, with the
result that substantial agglomeration occurs when the
particulated resin is isolated.
12~20
2?
Table 5
-
Dependence of Molecular Weight on Reaction Time~
Number Average '~eight Average
Reaction Time, Free Phenol, Molecular ~eight, Molecular Weight,
hours / Mn Mw
2 12.8 260 870
3 8.5 370 3,000
4 7.5 430 11,300
6.8 460 14,800
6 6.7 470 179000
7 6.4 470 18,000
afor a reaction batch with 50 /~ by weight
organics, and 1.25 parts by weight of Catalyst I.
Example 9
This example, with the results listed in Table 6,
demonstrates that the mean particle size of the particulate
novolac resin can be varied depending upon the type of
protective colloid utilized, the amount of the protective
colloid, and the relative amount of formal~ehyde to phenol
used. The particle size of the novolac resin, which was
produced using substantially the formulations and procedures
set forth in Example 1~ can be decreased by utilizing greater
amounts of protective colloid, or by reducing the formaldehyde
to phenol ratio. The particle size is also progressively
decreased by utilizing guar gum, in place of gum ghatti, and
gum arabic. The increase in particle size due to higher
ratios of formaldehyde to phenol is due to the increased melt
viscosity that the novolac resin exhibits at the higher
12920
lz~GG97
molecular weight. Particle size may also be dependent upon
the amount of shear in the reaction system, such that
increased agitation would produce particles having smaller
- diameters, as well as the amount of water utilized.
12920
1~G697
24
C o o o
o ~ o o o o
L ~ O ~ u~ ~
U ~ I I ~ I O O
2~ Q! I I U~
a~
V7
a~
_ ~ O O O ~n o o
U ~ o oLf~ O
_ a~ o ~ _, ~ _,
~ ~ _~
C~
-
U o
~,_ C~ ~o
c ~5 O O O O ~
o O o O o o o
~0 E C
.' ~
C~ o --
a
o
c
~ c
s ~L
~J ~ O O O O o O
o.
~ oo
_l
c~ Q
U
~,-o ~ ~ E E E~ El
U o t C cn cn c~
--
~, L ~ '_
o o E E
C!~
n
12920
~2~i69'7
Example 10
An analysis comparing the physical properties of
various particulate novolac resins produced from some of the
- procedures described above, with conventional novolac resins
S is presented in Table 7. The results demonstrate the breadth
of properties which can be obtained by s~lecting the desired
parameters within a wide range of formulations and conditions
falling within the procedures set forth in the present
invention. The physical properties of the particulate novolac
resins produced by the process of the present invention can
span both the conventional low molecular weight and high
molecular weight novolac resins of the prior art.
12920
~Z~669~7
O ~ ~ N D ~~rO~ ~n D 1~ r~
-- L '_~
. -
t9 L U
~ _ ¦ o o o o 8 o ~ o o 8 8
-- V -- -- _ N N _ _ _ _ ~ N
3 C Z
C~
O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O -
D ~ O r~ ~ ~O r~ ~ ~ ~
C U ~ U = O O O
U = ~ O U .~
U L L L
Z V ¦ ~ ~ N ~Cl~ ~ N ~ D V U C
r~ O C~ _ ~ N ~ _ _ _
3 L ~ ~1 ~
L U ~ ~ ~ ~
L O ~ 1_ ~
U U C ~ ~ C~ O -- ~ N N N ~ ~ ~, ~ ~,_ V
._ ,~ U --
c ~. o ~ ~ el ~
C ~ C C C ~
~ D J~ ~ E c L
._ ~J O. ~ ~ D ~~_~ N 0~ CO ~ O _ Vl C!~
1-- 0 -- L L L ~ C
_
C C C C ~
~J ~ O D N N r~r~ N g ID ~ 0~ 0 11~ r ~ /O
1:1 O ~ ~ N ~ _ _ ~ a ~ ~ v
L -- ~ V
~~V OJ ~ V ~ ~ U ~ U ~
._ E E E E E O E E O O o o o
~V ~c x x x ~ o x ~ O z O
12920
12~6~9~7
27
Example 11
This example sets forth that part of the invention
directed to the production of particulate novolac resin
aqueous dispersions. The formulation in Table 8 sets forth
-5 the amount of components us~d during the particulate novolac
: resin formation procedure. The formulation was selected for
convenience, and is not necessarily an optimized formulation
for any particular end use application.
TABLE 8
Reaction Formulation
Component Parts, by Weight Grams per
l-Liter Batch
Phenol 100 200
Formalin 48 96.8*
lS Catalyst I 0.8 1.6
Gum Arabic 2.0 4.0
Guar Gum 2.0 4.0
Distilled Water 100 200
25% NaOH 1.25 2.5
*-Weight corrected for 49.6% assay
The procedure entailed weighing the phenol into a one
liter flask equipped with a motor-driven paddle stirrer, a
thermometer and a reflux condenser. Catalyst I was added
and the mixture heated to 95 C. After this temperature is
reached, Formalin is added drop-wise for one hour, with the
addition raising the reaction temperature to as high as 104 C.
Approximately 45 minutes after the Formalin was inititally
added to the mixture, the originally clear solution became
very opaque, signifying the "cloud point".' The Formalin
addition was completed, and the mixture heated to reflux.
12920
28
Af~er just over an hour of refluxing, the 25~ NaOH was
added to the batch ~o achieve a pH of approximately 8.
The gum arabic in aqueous solution was then adted and the
~ixture reheated to refluxing. After an hour of refluxing
at 100 C, the mixture was cooled to 80 C in ~ w~ter bat;l.
A photomicrograph of a sample at this time indicated a
particle size of up to 300 microns. The guar gum was then
added to the mixture with mixing for approximately thirty
minutes. Another sample 2hotomicrograph indicated particle
sizes less than 20 microns ,and a mean particle size of
approximately 10 microns. The viscous mixture was then
cooled to 40 C and discharged into a containing vessel.
Example 12
An additional experiment was conducted using substan-
tially th~ formulation and procedures set forth in Example
11, except that the amount of guar gum added was varied as
shown in Table 9 below.
TABLE 9
Parts Guar Guml Dispersion Particle
20 100 Parts Phenol Size
Mean,microns Maximum,microns
None 300 600
0.5 100 300
0.75 50 90
1.0 20 30
2.0 10 20
12~20
hZl&6~7
29
An analysis of 20.0 grams of ~he resin dispersion was
conducted by dissolving 1.02 grams of Hexa therein.
150 C hot plate gel time of an average of 118 seconds was
_ observed.
Example 13
This exæmple was conduc~ed using substantially the
formulation and procedures set forth in ,xample 11, except
that the amoun~ of Formalin was raised to 51.0 parts
(102.8 grams) and the amount of guar gum was lowered to
1.2~ parts (2.5 grams). A sample photomicrograph indicated
that the particulate novolac resin aqueous dispersion
contained particle sizes up to 50 microns, with an average
particle size of approxi~ately 30 microns. Analysis of 1.02
grams of Hexa dissolved in 20.0 grams of resin dispersion
produced hot plate gel times for two trial runsof 107 and
104 seconds, at 150 C.
Example 14
This example was conducted using substantially the
formulation and procedures set forth in Example 11, except
that the gum arabic was replaced with gum ghatti, and the
guar gum level was cut in half to 1.0 parts (2.0 grams).
The partio~te novolac resin aqueous dispersion that was
produced was readily water dilutable, and a photomicro-
graph of the sample indicated particle sizes of up to 30
25 to 40 microns, with a mean particle size of approximately
12920
12~i6~7
15 microns. An analysis of 20.0 grams of the resins
dispersion ~ith 1.2 grams of Hexa dissolved therein showed
hot plate gel times, at 150 C of 116 and 112 seconds.
The results show that it is possible to alter resin
molecular weight and gum combinations while still obtainina
dispersions having s~all particle size distributions.
12920
