Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
Z6227
-- 1 --
This invention relates to a silica base material for
dentifrice formulation, particularly to one for transpire-
en dentifrice formulation, which gives an outstanding,
stable transparency yet with a desired abrasiveness.
Of late years transparent dentifrice formulations of
various types have been developed and put on the market,
giving a favorable impression of freshness an cleanly-
news acquitted with their transparency.
Unless, however, a silica base material with substantially
no abrasiveness, which essentially disqualifies it, is
used to give transparency to the dentifrice formulation,
it is hard to produce a commercially stable transparent
dentifrice formulation due to the fluctuation and the
poor time stability in refractive index of silica base
materia~swhich, when made into a paste with a transparent
dentifrice vehicle, should approximate in refractive index
to the other to give transparency to the formulation.
Several methods have been proposed to produce silica base
materials having appropriate abrasiveness for transparent
formulation, for example, Japanese Patent Publication No.
'74-11159 describes a method wherein a commercial super-
fine amorphous silica devoid of abrasiveness and therefore
unsuitable for dentifrice base material is wetted with
water or a dilute aqueous solution of inorganic alkali
metal salt, fired at 500-1000C, and then ground. It is
true that this method provides abrasiveness needed by a
dentifrice base material, but the abrasiveness thus pro-
voided is often so much in excess as to damage tooth enamel
and the material itself does not give good transparency
and consistent stability. Finally, it would be hard to
industrialize the method economically.
Another method is described in Japanese Patent Cook Nos.
'76-12869 and '76-136841 to provide abrasiveness to
I
-- 2 --
silica. The material obtained by this method, however,
does not give good paste stability when combined with a
transparent dentifrice vehicle.
The invention described in Japanese Patent Publication No.
'73-14935 discloses a transparent dentifrice formulation
containing silica specified as follows:
refractive index 1.40 - 1.47
oil absorption 1.5 cc and less
particle size cay 0.01 - 0.5 I.
The silica prepared by the method disclosed in the invent
lion gives a BET surface of 150 mug and a CRAB surface
area of 82 mug When this silica is mixed with humectant
and left to stand, the turbidity of the mixture, or paste,
grows markedly from day to day and the paste stability
gradually deteriorates.
In addition, one of the present inventors disclosed in
Japanese Patent Publications Nos. '74-8640 and '77-15078
a method to control the refractive index of silica by
allowing fluoride ions to intervene in the proposed pro-
cuss. The product of this invention as a base material for transparent dentifrice formulation was still not with-
out transparency problems and was not as time stable as
expected.
Thus the silicas publicly known heretofore have defects
either in abrasiveness, time stability or transparency
which are the essential characteristics of a base material
for transparent dentifrice formulation, and therefore none
of them is satisfactory for such formulation.
As a result of years of intensive study of these essential
characteristics of silica base materials, the present in-
venters have now discovered that combinations of a tooth
paste vehicle with the silica base material of the present
invention, as described in detail below, can provide a
` ,` `
~Z;~:6Z~
transparent dentifrice formulation with proper abrasive-
news, water like transparency and good long term stability
under storage.
Transparency as referred to in this invention is defined
and measured as follows: two solutions of different rev-
reactive indices like glycerine and water are mixed in
various proportions to give dispersion media of different
refractive indices; a fixed amount of silica base
material is then mixed with a fixed amount of each medium
into a dispersion, which, if needed, is decorated and
subjected to measurement of refractive index and turbid-
fly; and with these as parameters a curve is plotted to
determine the minimum turbidity point which represents the
transparency.
The present inventors studied in detail the factors
influencing the transparency and, finding that the pros-
fly of silica base material is very significant, arrived
at the present invention.
According to the invention a silica base material for
dentifrice formulation is characterized by having a specie
lie surface area by the BET method of 270-500 mug
android, and a specific surface area by the CRAB method
of 5-60 m /g-anhydride; by giving virtually amorphous X-
ray diffraction patterns after firing at 1100C; and by
having a refractive index of 1.455-1.470.
Before proceeding to further details of the present
invention, explanations will be given of the above term-
neology referring to specific surface area by the BET
method, specific surface area by the CRAB method, refract
live index, X-ray diffraction after firing at 1100C, and
loss by abrasion, or abrasiveness.
l~Z~;Z2~
1. Measurement of specific surface area by the BET method.
With liquid nitrogen as coolant, the quantitative
adsorption of nitrogen gas by the sample is measured
at -196C; the surface area per one gram of sample
in android form is then calculated, based on the
molecular cross section of nitrogen, AYE . De-
aeration of sample is conducted at 140C under a
vacuum of 1 x 10 5 mmHg for 60 minutes.
2. Measurement of specific surface area by the CRAB
method. Seattle methyl ammonium bromide CRAB is
allowed to be adsorbed onto the sample until Saturn-
lion from its aqueous solution; the surface area per
gram of sample in android form then calculated,
based on the molecular cross section of the bromide,
O,
35 A .
Procedure:- Take 1 g of a sample of known moisture
content in a 300 ml conical flask having a common
stopper. Add 100 ml of 0.55% solution of CRAB and
bring the pi of the mixture to 9.0 with 0.lN Noah
solution. Keep agitating for 2 hours with a magnetic
stirrer. Settle the suspension centrifugally and
transfer 10 ml of the supernatant into a 300 ml conic
eel flask. Add 50 ml of demineralized water, 25 ml
of chloroform, drops of bromophenol blue indicator
and titrate it with sodium dustily sulfa succinate
(Aerosol OTT a trade mark of Wake Junk Cage OK
Japan) solution previously calibrated by a standard
CRAB solution. End the titration when the chloroform
layer is decolourized while the aqueous layer is
slightly tinged purple. Mark the consumption in ml
of Aerosol OX as V2.
Then conduct a blank titration in a similar manner on
10 ml of the first CRAB solution only and mark the
Aerosol OX consumption in ml as Al.
I
~Z262~7
Calculate the surface area per gram of an hydrate
(Smug) by the following equation:
S = 5.78 x TV - V2 x a
wherein X = sample weight as an hydrate (g);
a = CRAB in weight (my) equivalent to 1 ml of
the Aerosol OX solution.
3. Refractive index. Mix glycerine and water in various
proportions to obtain dispersing media of different
refractive indices. Disperse 15 g of sample in 35 g
of each medium, using a vacuum mortar mixer for 10
minutes.
Measure the refractive index and turbidity of the mix-
lure at 25C and plot the data to obtain a refractive
index-turbidity curve. Represent the sample by the
refractive index of the mixture at the lowest turbid-
fly point. In these measurements use an Abbe's rev-
ractometer and an integration sphere turbidimeter;
and determine turbidity from the transmittance at
sample thickness of 1 mm.
4. X-ray diffraction after firing at 1100C. Take about
5 g of sample on a platinum plate and fire it at 1100C
for an hour in an electric furnace. Then examine it
on an X-ray diffractometer.
5. Abrasiveness. Use an abrasion tester employing horn-
zontal brushing movement. A suspension of 25% of
fine powder silica in 60~ glycerine/water solution is
placed on the flat face of a bronze plate a testing
brush under a iced of 500g conducts 18,000 brushing
movements; the weight loss of the bronze plate is
then measured as a test of abrasiveness of the silica.
I
~LZ26Z2
-- 6 --
The word "android" as used in this invention reforest a form or state of finely ground silica dried to
nearly constant weight at 105C for two hours.
The method for making the silica base material for dentin
rice formulation which is the subject of this invention
will now be described in detail.
The alkali metal silicate used in the invention includes
sodium, potassium and lithium silicate, but most usually
sodium silicate because it is less costly. Silicates
having a molar ratio Sioux (wherein X denotes an alkali
metal) of 2-4 can be used. The acidifying agent used in
this invention is hydrochloric or sulfuric acid.
The preferable Sue concentration of the alkali metal
silicate solution at the stage of acidification with such
acid is 5-15~ by weight and the preferred acid concentra-
lion is also 5-15% by weight; and in proper combination
with other reaction parameters the acid and silicate con-
cent rations within such ranges can bring forth the desired
properties of silica base material.
The electrolytes preferred in this invention are alkali
metal salts of mineral acids such as sodium chloride,
potassium chloride, sodium sulfate, potassium sulfate,
sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, sodium nitrate and
potassium nitrate, to name only sodium and potassium salts
as typical examples. The electrolyte is used in the range
of 10-60% by weight of Sue, as required, considering the
abrasiveness of silica base material.
In the present invention the alkali metal silicate soul-
lion is first made to react with hydrochloric of sulfuric
acid under the presence of such an electrolyte.
~2~26Z~7
The preferred manner of performing the reaction is to mix
the electrolyte in advance with the alkali metal silicate
solution, which may enhance the abrasiveness of the sift-
cay base material. This, however, does not exclude methods
in which the electrolyte, in consideration of its quanta-
try, reaction temperature, reaction time, etc., is added
to hydrochloric or sulfuric acid in advance. Thus it is
possible to charge the reactor with alkali metal silicate
solution and electrolyte solution simultaneously or sepal
rarely, or to mix these two solutions prior to their introduction into the reactor
It is preferred to conduct the reaction under strong
agitation in a temperature range of 60-100C.
According to the invention, there is provided a method of
producing silica base material disclosed by reaction
between an alkali metal silicate solution and hydrochloric
or sulfuric acid in the presence of an electrolyte where-
in the method is conducted in two stages; a silica cry-
tallization stage in which the pi of reaction mixture is
brought to 10.0, and an acidification stage in which the
pi is finally brought down to 3.5 or less; wherein the
ratio of the rate of addition of chloride or sulfate ions
in the acidification stage to the rate of addition of color-
ire or sulfate ions in the silica crystallization stage
is at least 3:2; and wherein the acidification stage
takes no more than about 30 minutes.
The silica crystallization stage means the stage of react
lion where more than 95% of silica content (as Sue) in
the alkali metal silicate solution crystallizes out. It
is preferable to conduct this part of reaction so that it
takes 40 minutes to 4 hours. Meanwhile, the acidification
stage is the stage of the reaction ranging from the point
where most of the silica has crystallized out at a react
lion pi of 10.0 to the point where the pi has been brought
,~,.
.,~ .. j
l;~Z6Z~7
down to 3.5 or less by adding hydrochloric or sulfuric
acid. Prolongation of the acidification for some reason
makes it difficult to obtain silica base material of good
transparency and satisfactory abrasiveness. The present
inventors have found that for a variety of silica base
materials of low to high abrasiveness for transparent
dentifrice formulation, it is necessary to perform the
acidification stage in no more than 30 minutes and that
the ratio of the rates of addition of hydrochloric or sulk
uric ion in the two stages should be as set forth above Shortening the acidification stage in this way led to
remarkable improvements in the characteristics of silica
base material.
When the pi of reaction mixture in the acidification stage
is brought to 3.5 or less, more particularly 1.5-3.0, the
refractive index of the resulting silica base material
can be brought to within a narrow range of 1.455-1.470.
When the reaction end point pi exceeds 3.5, silica base
material good for transparent formulations can not be
obtained because of the spread of refractive indices of
the crystals.
After acidification, aging may be performed for 10 minutes
or longer but is not a requisite, followed by filtering,
washing, detouring, drying and grinding of the silica
base material in the usual manner.
The silica base material thus obtained has a specific
surface area by the BUT method of 270-500 m2/g-anhydride,
a specific surface area by the CRAB method of 5-60 mug
android; it gives amorphous X-ray diffraction pattern
after firing at 1100C; and it has a refractive index of
1.455-1.470.
The product shows good transparency indicated by a minimum
turbidity of 0.05 or less and a long term stability. The
I: i
4 `
~Z~Z7
g
abrasiveness of the product can be adjusted freely within
the range of 2-90 my to provide a useful base material
particularly for transparent dentifrice formulations.
The process described above is one process for producing
silica base material for transparent dentifrice formula-
lions, but it is also possible to obtain by different
processes silica base material having a specific surface
area by the BET method of 270-500 m /g-anhydride and a
specific surface area by the CRAB method of 5-60 mug
android, giving amorphous X-ray diffraction patterns
after firing at 1100C. The thus obtained base material
has excellent transparency and stability over time.
Furthermore, in the production of the silica herein, it
is, of course, possible to use and add, for the purpose
of adjusting abrasiveness or as a refractive index control-
lying agent, to the alkali metal silicate solution, hydra-
caloric acid or sulfuric acid or other acids in the react
lion stage to add aluminum sulfate, aluminum chloride,
calcium chloride, magnesium chloride, basic salts of these
compounds, sodium fluoride, potassium fluoride, ammonium
fluoride, for example.
The features of the silica base material for dentifrice
formulations of this invention are further illustrated by
the references and examples described below.
Reference 1
Into a 20 reactor equipped with a baffle plate and an
agitator with 150 mm D turbine blades was introduced 10
kg of an aqueous solution of sodium silicate (NATO 3.2
Sue) containing 90 g/kg of Sue and then, with the react
lion temperature kept at 50C, 9.0% sulfuric acid was added at a flow rate of 85 gamin for 42 minutes to bring
the pi of reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the addition
of 9.0~ sulfuric acid was continued at the flow rate of
~ZZ6~2~7
-- 10 --
135 gamin until 10 minutes later when the pi reached 5.8.
The acid addition was stopped and the reaction mixture
was allowed to stand for aging for 15 minutes. After
repeated filtration and washing, the obtained solid was
5 dried in a hot air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The silica fine powder thus obtained has a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 295 mug and by the CRAB
method of 218 mug it gave c~-cristobalite X-ray diffract
lion patterns after firing at 1100C. The fine silica
10 powder thus obtained had a poor abrasiveness and, when it
was used for toothpaste, increased the viscosity. Thus,
silica of this kind was found not to be usable for tooth-
paste preparation.
Reference 2
15 Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
of an aqueous solution of sodium silicate (NATO 2.8 Sue)
containing 110 g/kg of Sue and 4 g/kg of Nail and then,
with the reaction temperature kept at 65C, 10% sulfuric
acid was added at a flow rate of 107 gamin for 63 minutes
20 to bring the pi of the reaction mixture to 2.1. After
the addition stopped, the reaction mixture was allowed to
stand for aging for 30 minutes. After repeated filter-
lion and washing, the wet cake was dried in a hot air
oven at 110C and finely ground.
25 The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 380 mug and by the CRAB
method of 152 mug it gave an amorphous X-ray diffract
lion pattern after firing at 1100C. This silica had
good transparency as base material for transparent dentin
30 rice formulation but gave poor abrasiveness to the tooth-
paste product.
, . .
$ ..~
-- 11 --
Reference 3
Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
of an aqueous solution of sodium silicate (NATO 3.1 Sue)
containing 100 g/kg of Sue and 15 g/kg of Nail and then,
with the reaction temperature kept at 75C, 10% sulfuric
acid was added at a flow rate of 44 gamin for 84 minutes
to bring the PI of reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the
addition of 10% sulfuric acid was continued at a flow
rate of 148 gamin until 10 minutes later when the pi
reached 4.5. The acid addition was stopped and the react
lion mixture was allowed to stand for aging for 20 minutes.
After repeated filtration and washing, the obtained solid
was dried in a hot air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 196 mug and by the CRAB
method of 42 mug it gave an a-cristobalite X-ray dip-
fraction pattern after firing at 1100C. This silica had
comparatively high abrasiveness as base material for den-
tifrice formulations, but the product made from this
silica showed high turbidity and poor long term transpire-
envy; thus, this silica was not of such quality as can
be used for transparent toothpaste as base material.
Reference 4
Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
of sodium silicate solution Noah 3.1 Sue) containing
100 g/kg of Sue and 15 g/kg of Nail and then with the
reaction temperature kept at 75C, 10% sulfuric acid was
added at a flow rate of 148 gamin for 25 minutes to bring
the pi of the reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the add-
lion of 10% sulfuric acid was continued at a flow rate off gamin until 35 minutes later when the pi reached 4.6.
The acid was stopped and the reaction mixture was allowed
to stand for aging for 20 minutes. After repeated
~226~27
- 12 -
filtration and washing, part of the wet cake was dried in
a hot air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 224 mug and another by
the CRAB method of 103 m go it gave an a-cristobalite
X-ray diffraction pattern after firing at 1100C. It had
less abrasiveness as compared with silica produced in
Reference 3, also poor long term transparency, thus not
being suitable for transparent dentifrice formulation as
base material.
Reference 5
Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
of an aqueous solution of sodium silicate (Noah Sue)
containing 95 g/kg of Sue and 25 g/kg Nail and then, with
the reaction temperature kept at 87C, 10% sulfuric acid
was added at a flow rate of 34 gamin for 100 minutes to
bring the pi of reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the add-
lion of 10% sulfuric acid was continued at a flow rate of
78 gamin until 18 minutes later when the pi reached 3.9.
The acid was stopped and the reaction mixture was allowed
to stand for aging for 15 minutes. After repeated lit-
traction and washing, the obtained solid was dried in a
hot air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 207 mug and by the CRAB
method of 26 mug it gave an a-cristobalite X-ray dip-
fraction pattern after firing at 1100C. This silica
base material proved to be a product of sufficient Abram
suaveness to meet the requirements of a base material for
toothpaste, but with high turbidity and poor transparency
over time, and was not suited as a silica base material
for transparent dentifrice formulations.
. .
~11 fog AL' '
JL~t~Z;;~
- 13 -
Reference 5
Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
of sodium silicate solution (Noah Sue) containing
110 g/kg of Sue and 40 g/kg of Nikko and then with the
reaction temperature kept at 80C, 10% sulfuric acid was
added at a flow rate of 47 gamin for 120 minutes to bring
to 5.6 the pi of the reaction mixture, which was then
allowed to stand for aging for 30 minutes. After repeated
filtration and washing, the wet cake was dried in a hot
air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific sun-
face area by the BET method of 82 mug and by the CRAB
method of 17 m go it gave an a-crystobalite X-ray dip-
fraction pattern after firing at 1100C. This silica had
high abrasiveness, but was not suited for transparent
dentifrice formulation as a base material due to lack of
transparency.
Reference 7
A commercially available silica base material for tooth-
paste made in the U.S.A. was tested for evaluation of
its physical properties. It was found that it had a
specific surface area by the BET method of 80 mug and by
the CRAB method of 40 my and Gavin a-cristobalite X-
ray diffraction pattern after being fired at 1100C.
It proved to be a product of moderate abrasiveness but
with a high turbidity of 0.21 and poor long term trays-
patency.
Comparison Example
Into a reactor used in reference 1 was introduced 10 kg
30 of sodium silica solution (Noah Sue) containing 95
lZ26~2~
- 14
g/kg of Sue and 20 g/kg of Nail and then with the
reaction temperature kept at 87C, 10~ sulfuric acid was
added at a flow rate of 37 gamin for 95 minutes to bring
the pi of the reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the add-
lion of 10% sulfuric acid was continued at a flow rate of
82 gamin until 19 minutes later when the pi reached 3.1.
The acid flow was stopped and the reaction mixture was
allowed to stand for aging for 30 minutes. After repeated
filtration and washing, the wet cake was dried in a hot
air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific
surface area by the BET method of 342 mug and by the
CRAB method of 39 mug it gave an amorphous X-ray dip-
fraction pattern after firing at 1100C. It proved to be
a product of moderate abrasiveness, good transparency and
long lasting transparency.
Table 1 shows the physical properties of the products
produced in these references, related to the Comparison
Example of the present invention:
Table 1:
Refer- BET method CRAB Mecca X-ray Abrasive- Turbidity Refractive
ennui surface surface diffract news just day index
area area lion after after
mug tm2/g) (my) mixed mixed
1 295 218 d-cristabalite 0.2 0.15 0.37 1.444
2 380 152 amorphous 0.5 0.02 0.03 1.462
3 196 42 ~-cristabalite 8.3 0.63 0.85 1.450
4 224 103 ~-cristabalite 1.2 0.19 0.42 1.456
207 26 d-cristabalite 24.3 0.42 0.68 1.455
6 82 17 ~-cxis~lite 37.40.95 0.96 impossible
to measure
7 80 40 ~-crist~x~ite 17~8 0.21 0.46 1.457
Compaq 342 39 amorphous 20.9 0.04 0.04 1.460
risen
Example
~2~6;~2~
The 5 day turbidity provides an index of long term trays-
patency of a formulation having the refractive index of
the fine silica powder. The refractive index is refract
live index value immediately after mixing; the turbidity
just after mixing shows the turbidity in a formulation
having refractive index immediately after mixing.
As described in above References Nos. 1 to 7 and the
example of the present invention, three parameters, the
BET specific surface area, the CRAB specific surface area
and the X-ray diffraction pattern after firing at 1100C
are important factors for determining such physical pro-
parties of silica base material for transparent dentifrice
formulations as transparency, abrasiveness and long last-
in transparency of the toothpaste product. Silica fail-
in to provide satisfactory values of these three pane-
meters is not desirable as silica base material for tooth-
paste, particularly for transparent dentifrice formula-
lions.
When the silica base material of the present invention is
used in a transparent toothpaste formulation, the base
material is mixed and kneaded with a transparent paste
vehicle. In order to give proper fluidity to such tooth-
paste formulation, the paste vehicle is chosen from
humectants and binders. Among humectants there are, for
example, glycerine, sorbitol, polyethylene glycol, dew-
twine, propylene glycol, etc., and for binders there are
carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium allegiant, etc. Tooth-
paste formulations containing such humectants or binders
and other ingredients such as cleaning agent, perfume,
sweetening, enzyme and various medicinal adjutants are
widely known to those experienced in the art.
As is understood from the explanation given, the silica
base material of the present invention is most effectively
used in the production of transparent toothpaste of
.,. . .
1~2~
- 16 -
desired abrasiveness.
The invention will be further explained by way of
examples, which in no way shall be construed to limit the
scope of the invention.
In the following examples, percentages denote percentages
by weight unless otherwise specified.
Example 1
Into a 5 m reactor equipped with a baffle plate and an
agitator with 850 mm D turbine blades was introduced 2775
kg of an aqueous solution of sodium silicate (NATO 3.1
Sue) containing 95 g/kg of Sue and 25 g/kg of Nail and
then, with the reaction temperature kept at 87C, 10~
sulfuric acid was added at a flow rate of 10.1 kg/min for
96 minutes to bring the pi of the reaction mixture to
10Ø Then the addition of 10% sulfuric acid was con-
tinted at the flow rate of 17.9 kg/min until 28 minutes
later when the pi reached 1.8. The acid was stopped and
the reaction mixture was allowed to stand for aging for
15 minutes. After repeated filtration and washing, part
of the wet cake was dried in a hot air oven at 110C and
finely ground.
The fine silica powder thus obtained had a specific
surface area by the BET method of 293 mug and by the
CRAB method of 16 mug it gave an amorphous X-ray dip-
fraction pattern after firing at 1100C; it had an Abram
suaveness value of 26.1 my, a refractive index of 1.462
and a lowest turbidity of 0.020; and it proved to be a
product of high abrasiveness and long term transparency.
Example 2
Into a 20 reactor equipped with a baffle plate and an
.~.
~2~6Z27
- 17 -
agitator with 150 mm D turbine blades was introduced 10
kg of sodium silicate solution (NATO 2.8 Sue) containing
100 g/kg of Sue and 35 g/kg of Nail and then, with the
reaction temperature kept at 80C, 10% sulfuric acid was
added at a flow rate of 97 gamin for 42 minutes to bring
the pi of the reaction mixture to 10Ø Then the add-
lion of 10~ sulfuric acid was continued at 148 gamin until
14 minutes later when the pi reached 2.2. The acid flow
was stopped and the reaction mixture was allowed to stand
for aging for 15 minutes. After repeated filtration and
washing, the obtained solid was dried in a hot air oven at
110C and finely ground. The silica powder thus obtained
had a specific surface area by the BET method of 315 mug
and another by CRAB method of 28 mug it gave an armor-
pious X-ray diffraction pattern after being fired at
1100C; it had an abrasiveness value of 19.5 my, a rev-
reactive index of 1.462 and a lowest turbidity of 0.028;
and it proved to be a product of moderate abrasiveness
and long lasting transparency.
Example 3
Into a 10 æ reactor equipped with a baffle plate and an
agitator with 100 mm D turbine blades was introduced 4.5
kg of an aqueous solution of potassium silicate (KIWI
Sue) containing 100 g/kg of Sue and 20 g/kg of K2SO4
and then, with the reaction temperature kept at 75C, 8%
hydrochloric acid was added at a flow rate of 12.7 gamin
for 126 minutes to bring the pi of the reaction mixture
to 10Ø Then the addition of I hydrochloric acid was
continued at 31.8 gamin until 25 minutes later when the
pi reach 2.3. The acid flow was stopped and the reaction
mixture was allowed to stand for aging for 20 minutes.
After repeated filtration and washing, the obtained solid
was dried in a hot air oven at 110C and finely ground.
The fine silica power thus obtained had a specific
~Z~Z2~,~
-- 18 --
surface area by the BET method of 286 mug and another by
the CRAB method of 23 mug it gave an amorphous X-ray
diffraction pattern after hying fired at 1100C; it had
an abrasiveness value of 12.3 my, a refractive index of
1.461 and a lowest turbidity of 0.018; and it proved to
be a product of moderate abrasiveness and long lasting
transparency.
The examples given above clearly show that the product of
the present invention has excellent characteristics as a
base material for transparent dentifrice formulations.
In order to show more concretely the longevity of trays-
patency it gives to such formulations, turbidity changes
were traced for three paste formulations each containing
25~ of the silica powder mentioned in the corresponding
example and having a refractive index adjusted to 1.463.
The results were as shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Example Turbidity Just After Turbidity After
Formulation One Month
-
0.035 0.030
2 0.038 0.042
3 0.053 0.048
Table 2 shows by comparison the levels of refractive index
and turbidity of two brands of commercially available
toothpaste.
25 Table 2
Commercial Transparent Refractive Turbidity
Toothpaste Index
Brand A (made in U.S.A.) 1.4600 0.321
Brand B (made in U.S.A.) 1.4593 0.274
~2~;ZZ7
-- 19 --
Comparison of these and other data cited herein before
reveals clearly that the transparent toothpaste formula-
lions now commercially available are substantially less
transparent than the corresponding formulations using the
silica base material of the present invention.
