Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~2~;277~
In US. Patent No. 4,154,100 owned by the a~algnee of the present
application, a pits tube type flow measuring device was disclosed which
had as its most important feature 8 contoured so-called "bluff body" which
split the flow of fluid flowing within a pipe or other conduit and
established precise flow separation zones on both sides thereof. my
establishing these zones and shaping the body downstream thereof such that
the flow could not reattach thereto over a broad range of flow conditions,
the pressure determined by applyl~g a correction factor (flow coefficient)
to the differential between the average dynamic fluid pressure sensed by
two or more upstream-facin~ ports and the reference or downstream pressure r
sensed by other downstream-facing ports in the wake of the fluid flowing
around the probe could be much more reliably and accurately determined than
from pilot tube type flow meters which were devoid of such features.
Pilot tube type flow meters for measuring fluid flow are widely
used and have been for many years, some of the early ones having been
patented around the turn of the century. Simple as they seem to be at
first glance, the truth is that they are quite complicated and much ho yet
to be learned about them, how to improve their sensitivity and what can be
done to make them more accurate under a wide range of flow conditions. For
instance, the ones used to measure fluids, gases and even two-phase flow in
a pipe or other conduit must, of necessity, be more complex because of the
influence the pipe has on the characteristics of the flow than one, for
instance, on the leading edge of an aircraft wing which is subjected to a
flowing fluid (air) whose flow characteristics approach those of ideal or
perfect luminary flow. Flow in the low pressure regimes has proven to be
most difficult to measure accurately because it is in this area that such
factors as the misalignment of the upstream-facin~ holes sup that they fail
... . . . . .
... . . . . . . .....
~Z3Z~8
to sense the most lmports~t so-called taxation pressure" where the fluid
has essentially zero velocity or the pressure differential between ports in
the probe itself cause a flow of fluid there between that is aeon as an
error in the dynamic pressure reading have their most profound influence.
S The flow rate of one of the most common of all fluids, namely, steam has
been found to be very difficult to determine accurately and pilot tube type
probes that produce very adequate results in other fluids, even come
two-phase systems, do not work well with steam, at least over extended
periods of time.
If, as shown in assignees US. patent referred to previously, the r
edges of the bluff body perpendicular to the flow are made sharp, the
accuracy of the unit is improved as well as the strength of the signal at
certain Reynolds Numbers. The reason for the effectiveness of the sharp
corners is that when fluid flows around a smooth continuous body it will
follow the contour of the body until inertial forces in the fluid cause it
to break away from the surface and to flow in a more or less straight
line. When the fluid begins breaking away from the surface of the body,
however, the differential pressure between the upstream and
downstream-facing surfaces changes in a manner unrelated to the velocity of
the flu near the body. Therefore, if such a body is used as a flow
sensing device, the resulting signal fails to be proportional to flow at
certain flow rates. On the other hand, if the fluid is induced by some
means such as, for example, sharp edges, to separate from the body at very
low velocities, the differential pressure between the upstream and
downstream surfaces will remain proportional to the velocity of the flow
and thus to the flow rate.
, . ..... .. ... . .. . . .
It has recently been discovered however, that these side edges of
the probe do Dot, in fact, have to be knife edge sharp , but instead, a
relationship exists between their degree of sharpness and the transverse
width of the bluff body separating one such side edge from the other which,
if observed, will maintain the accuracy of the instrument over essentially
its full range of operability and practical use. Applicants have found
that this relatio~shlp can be expressed as follows:
rob < than 0~2
where or is the radius of the side edges and by is the transverse width of
the bluff body, i.e. the distance separating these side edges when r equals;
zero or these edges are sharp.
Causing the flow to separate from the bluff body along defined
lines of separation and not return thereto also produces a fairly uniform
low pressure over all of the surface of the probe downstream of the flow
separation zones which makes it not as sensitive to orientation and also
renders the location of the downstream-facing downstream pressure sensing
holes less critical for good accuracy.
In single-phase flow measurement applications, the accepted
practice followed by assignee and others has always been one of mounting
the sensing portion of the probe which is the part inside the pipe or
conduit on, or at least very close to being on, a diameter of the latter,
the allowable deviation lying in the range of 5 one way or another. This
same practice has been adhered to id two-phase systems in which liquid
particles are entrained in a gas; however, applicants have discovered that
such an approach is incorrect with respect to multiple-phase systems that
include both gaseous and liquid components. us a matter of fact, entirely
different mounting criteria must be employed for best results in hot and
~3277~3
cold two-phase systems. More specifically it has now been determined
that in hot two-phase systems like', for example, steam.linesj the probe
is preferably mounted such that its head end containing the readout
mechanism should, if at all possible, be mounted at an angle approximately
10 lower than its remote or tail end. This means that in vertically-
disposed steam lines, the probe should be tilted upwardly such that its tail
end is approximately 10 above its head end, the reason being that the
delicate electronics connected to the head end cannot stand temperatures
in excess of 180F. or so and, therefore by tilting the probe and allowing
the upstream- and downstream-facing plenums or chambers to partially fill
with water, it functions as an insulating buffer effective to prevent
damage to the electronic readout devices. The same holds true of a
horizontal line in that the head end of the probe can be located at the
nadir of the pipe or up either side something less than about 80.
Conversely, in cold multi-phase systems like for instance,
trying to measure the flow of wet natural gas issuing from a well at the
Waldo when it contains, at one time or another, water, drilling mud,
suspended solids, oil and other contaminants, the head end of the probe
should be positioned above the tail end so that such contaminants can drain
out and the resultant measurement is taken of the gaseous phase alone.
Accordingly, the tail end of the probe should, preferably, be tilted down
beneath the head by an angle of approximately 10..
It is, therefore, the principal object of the present
invention to provide a novel and improved pitot:tube type flow measurement
probe for use in confined flow environments that is especially well suited
to multi-phase systems in which one of the phases is liquid and another
gaseous.
~Z32778
A second objective is the provision of an instrument of
the type aforementioned which, in the case oft liquid-gas.phase systems,
employs a method of mounting same wherein a small portion of the entrained
liquid is trapped and retained inside the upstream- and downstream-facing
chambers in a position where the trapped liquid functions as an insulating
buffer protecting the delicate readout mechanism in the head from the
action of the hot gaseous constituents.
An additional object is to provide a method of mounting such
a probe for use in a cold multi-phase environment in which one of the
phases is a liquid and another gaseous such that all entrained liquids
drain out the tail end and the probe becomes essentially responsive to only
the gaseous phase.
Another objective of the invention herein disclosed and
claimed is that of providing a probe with a shaped bluff body having flow
separation zones on both sides thereof shaped within a range keyed to the
distance separating them from one another.
Further objects are to provide a flow measurement probe
which is simple, easy to install, accurate at even low flow rates, compact,
rugged, versatile, simple to service, inexpensive to manufacture and even
somewhat decorative.
Broadly stated, the inventions an improvement in a
pilot tube type flow measuring device of the type having a tubular body
of other than circular cross section with a head on one end and a closed
tail end on the other, means for attaching same to pipe such that the
tail end thereof is impacted by a fluid flowing inside the pipe and the
head end lies outside, a partition wall extending lengthwise of said body
dividing its interior into two isolated plenums, aspirate passage in
the head end connected into each of the plenums and connectable to externally-
located instrumentation for indicating the pressure in the latter, at
least one port opening into each of the plenums spaced along that portion
-- 6 --
., .. _., .. _.. _, .. _ . __ .. . . . _ _ .. ,_ ... _ _ _.
~L~3277~3
of the body that will be located within the stream of flowing fluid,
one o-F said ports being positionable.to face-upstream and:be.impacted
by the flowing fluid, and thither of said ports facing downstream
and lying in the wake of the fluid flowing past the body. The improvement
comprises: shaping the upstream-facing portion of the body impacted by
the flowing fluid so as to include a convex rounded leading edge separating
a pair of substantially planar port;ons.diverging therefrom in a down-
stream direction that terminate in a pair of.transversel.y-spaced sub-
staunchly parallel side margins cooperating with one another to define
flow separation zones effective to separate the fluid flowing there over
from said body,locatjng the upstream-facing ports in said leading edge,
and convexly curving said side margins about radii of a length no greater
than lath of the transverse distance there between.
In another aspect, the invention comprises the improved
method for mounting a pilot tube type:flow~measuring device in a two-phase
or a multi-phase flowing stream containing both liquid and gaseous
constituents wherein said measuring device is owe the type having a tubular
body, a partition wall extending the length thereof dividing its interior
into two isolated plenums, sets if thrower more ports in the body spaced
along the length thereof opening into each of said plenums, a head on one
end containing passages connected into each of said plenums connectable
to pressure measurement instrumentation, and a closed tail end opposite
its head end. The improvement comprises placing one of said head and tail
ends in an elevated position above the other such that puddles of liquid
are trapped in each of the plenums.
Other objects will be in part apparent and in part pointed
out specifically hereinafter in connection with the description of the
drawings that follows, and in which:
.. .. , . . , _
~232~71!3
Figure 1 is a side elevation portions of which have been
broken away and shown in section, detailing the upwardly-tilted.orientatiqn
of the probe within a vertically-disposed conduit when being used to
measure the flow of hot liquid-gas phase constituents;
Figure 2 is a fragmentary side elevation similar to
Figure 1 and to the same scale but showing the probe tilted downwardly
as it would be in the measurement of cold multi-phase systems containing
both a liquid and a gas;
Figure 3 is a section taken along line 3--3 of Figure 1
to a slightly enlarged scale; and,
Figure 4 is a diagram illustrating the tolerable relationship
between the roundness of the flow separation zones on Opposite sides of the
bluff body in relation to the transverse distance separating them.
- pa -
. , . , , . , , .. , . _ . . _ . _ . . , . _ , .. .. . . .
23Z7~7~3
Referring next to the drawings for a detailed description of
the present invention and, initially, to Fits. l, 2 Andy fur this purpose,
reference numeral lo has been selected to broadly designate the flow
measurement device of the present invention which will be seen in Figs. 1
and 2 mounted in the wall of a vertically disposed large diameter pipe or
conduit 12. A hole lo in the sidewall lo of the pipe receives what will be
referred to herein in a general way as the "sensor portion" 18 of the flow
measurement device or "probe" lo which extends all the way across to the
remote sidewall 20 as shown. As will be explained in greater detail
presently, the centerline or axis of the sensor lo intersects the centerline
of the pipe 12, however, contrary to traditional perpendicular mounting
techniques, it is tilted up or down relative to the latter when used to
measure the flow rates of multi-phase systems including both 1iguid and
gaseous components depending on whether they are hot or told. Any one of
several conventional types of mounting hardware represented herein by
simple sleeve 22 can be used to attach the probe lo in proper position with
respect to the centerline and sidewalls of the pipe; however, no attempt
has been made to illustrate such features in detail since they are well
known in the prior art and form no part of the invention. The sensor
portion 18 of the probe 10 terminates outside the pipe in a head 24 which
contains passages 26 and 28 that connect into its high pressure and the low
pressure plenums 30 and 32, respectively. These passages connect, in turn,
to conventional instrumentation illustrated schematically in Fig. l as high
pressure gauge Go and low pressure gauge Go for measuring the high and low
pressures, respectively, sensed in the plenums as the fluid flows past the
sensor portion of the probe lying inside the pipe. A partition wall or
divider 34 separates and isolates these two plenums one from the other as
,, . , .,, . . .. , . , . . .. , .. _ . , . _ _ _ _ . . . .. . . ..
~Z3Z~
18 Yost clearly seen in jig. 3. Three or morn upatream-fac1Dg so-called
"impact port" 36 connect the fluid flowing in pipe 12 into the high
pressure plenum 30, Lowe other similar downstream ports" 38 do llke~ise
with respect to the low pressure plenum 32.
In both Figs. 1 sod 2, the fluid flow is upwardly in the direction
of the upwazdly-dlrected arrows. This being the case, the upstream-faclng
impact ports 36 are, of course, in the bottom of the sensor portion 18
opening into the high pressure plenum 30 which lies underneath the low
pressure one, 32. Similarly, the downstream ports 3B are on top of the
sensor opening into the low pressure plenum there beneath. In the
particular form shown, however, where the arrangement of the ports 36 and
38 is identical on both the upstream and downstream faces of the sensor
portion 18 as are the high and low pressure plenums, the orientation of the
probe would remain exactly as shown in both of these figures if the
direction of flow were to be reversed, i.e. downwardly instead of
upwardly. The functions of the ports and the plenums associated therewith
would, obviously, change in that the ports 38 in the top of the sensor
portion would become the impact ports while ports 36 underneath would
assume the role of the downstream ports. In like manner, plenum 32 would
become the high pressure plenum and the other, 30, the low pressure one.
As can be seen most clearly in Fig. 3, the interior of the sensor
is divided by partition wall 34 into the two large volume plenums 30 and
32. Similar arrangements have been used by others, an early example being
the one shown in Lambert`s US. Patent No. 3,751,982. US. Patent
Nos. 4,343,195 and 4,425,807 show other versions of the dual plenum
sensor. In certain applications where plugging can become a problem, this
arrangement is preferred over those sensors which include a so-called
_ g _
., . , . ,, ,, . , , , . , ,, .. _, , , . , _ , . ,
Z7~
"interpolating tube" like those shown in US. Patents Nos. 3,581,565;
3,8Q3,921j and, 4,154,100 mentioned before. While these large volume
plenums are preferred over interpolating tubes it environments where over
an extended period of time the portions of the probe can plug up, they by
no means offer a complete solution to the problem since the size of the
ports 36 and 38 is equally critical.
ID flow measurement, the more precisely the stagnation pressure
can be determined, the better the accuracy of the instrument. Since, by
definition, stagnation pressure is that point at which the fluid has zero
velocity and maximum pressure, it is only reasonable to conclude that the r
smaller the opening in which the pressure it sensed, the more accurately
this point can be located. Unfortunately, this criteria is inconsistent
with a system devoid of plugging problems because, obviously, the larger
the pressure sensing port, the less susceptible it is to becoming plugged.
Directing the attention next to Fig. 3, it can be seen that
applicants` sensor portion 18 employs quite large diameter ports 36 and 38
located in broadly-radiused leading and trailing edges 40 and 42 thereof,
respectively. They have determined, quite unexpectedly, that by placing
large practically unplug gable openings in the upstream-facing rounded
surface, that even though they are dislocated slightly to one side or the
other from the stagnation point on the centerline of the probe, they sense
pressures which do not differ significantly from the stagnation pressure.
On the other hand, placing the same size holes in sharply-contoured leading
edges or, for that matter, flat ones oriented more or less perpendicular to
the direction of flow, result in pressure readings substantially different
from the stagnation pressure if these holes are not located precisely on
the centerline of the probe. An equally unexpected benefit derived from
-- 10 --
.. . .. . . . . .. .. . . . .. . . .
. ,, ., . .. . _ . , _ _ .. _ _ ... _ . , .. ... .. . . .. .. . . ...
~232~7i~3
providing the upstream-facing leading edge 40 with these gently-rounded
contours was the realization that the probe could even be rotated slightly
around its axis without moving the upstrea~-facing impact ports defined by
these oversize holes into regions having pressures substantially different
from the stagnation pressure. Here again, this was not what happened when
holes of the same size were placed in sharply-contoured or essentially
planar leading edges. Now, while it is only at the upstream-facing leading
edge 40 that the stagnation pressure exists and is to be sensed and
measured, in a bidirectional probe like that illustrated which, for all
practical purposes, is symmetrical about a transverse centerline, it is
best to contour both the upstream-facing leading edge 40 and the
downstream-facing trailing edge 42 alike.
Applicants have also discovered that the holes that form
the pressure-sensing ports 36 and 38 should be large enough to prevent
plugging.
1~Z3Z778
The spacing of the impact ports along the sensor portion 18 of the
probe is critical in terms of proper averaging of the pressures sensed at
various locations across the pipe; however, this aspect of the unit herein
described forms no part of the invention Lance it follows the well known
so-called ~Chebyshef~ locations developed by others many years ago. Each
sensing hole must represent the velocity in a specific area of the pipe or
conduit, and the area represented by any one hole must be exactly equal to
the area represented by any other hole.
With particular reference once again to Fig. 1, it will be see
that the need end of the probe is positioned considerably lower than its r
tail or remote end T. It will also be noted that fluid is trapped in the
head end of the probe, some part of loch extends out into the sensor
portion 18, both in the high pressure plenum 30 and the low pressure one,
32. The fluid lever in plenum 30 is, obviously, determined by the location
of the upstream-facing impact port 36F just inside the near sidewall I of
the pipe 14 since any fluid above this level will merely drain out of the
latter. In plenum 32, on the other hand, it is the similarly-located
downstream-facing reference port 38F that determines the level of fluid in
the low pressure chamber defined thereby. The important thing to notice,
however, is that the small body of fluid Pi trapped in plenum 30 as well as
the separate body thereof Pi trapped in chamber 32 there above both cover
the entryways 44 and 46 leading into passages 26 and 28, respectively, due
to the upward tilt of the probe. It is this mounting method that is
employed for two-phase or multi-phase systems containing a liquid along
with one or more hot gaseous constituents like, for example, wet or dry
steam. my tilting the probe such that the liquid phase forms the
insulating barriers Pi and Pi that protects the delicate instrumentation
- 12 -
~Z3~7~
(Go and Go) from the direct action of the hut vapor, no harm comes to the
latter. It has been found that an upward tilt of approximately.10.wi.ll
be sufficient in most hot liquid-gas phase applications to isolate the
instrumentation from -the direct action of the hot vapor. Fig. 1 shows an
upward tilt of around 20~ primarily for illustrative emphasis since the
minimum tilt angle sufficient to insure that the fluid pools are forming
the insulation barrier isolating the instrumentation from the action of the
hot gas is probably the best. Temperatures, the mounting technique
shown in Fig.. 1 should be used whenever the vapors approach approximately
180F. or so above which damage has been known to occur.
Certain other points should be mentioned in connection with
the hot.liquid-gas mounting of the probe shown in Fig. 1. First of all, it
makes no difference whether the flow is upward as shown or downward, the
exact same entrapment of the fluid bodies Pi and Pi will eventually occur.
In the case of downward flow, the system may need to be primed with fluid
to create the body Pi in what would be the downstream-facing low pressure
plenum or chamber 30 since it lies in the wake of the fluid flowing around
the bluff body and, therefore, no fluid would be reaching it directly. On
the other hand, condensation will eventually result in fluid collecting in
this chamber even without it being primed. Now, it is necessary that both
of these bodies of fluid be present when the instrumentation is calibrated
because, for all practical purposes, they will exist at all times during
normal operation and will. vary little, if any ionizes.
Something should, perhaps, be said about what would happen in
the case of superheated stemmer the like where there is very little of the
liquid phase present. In this situation as without steam, a certain
portion of whatever liquid is available will eventually condense out and
- 13 -
77~
form the puddles Pi and Pi. There ~111 be a difference, however, and it
will be that the superheated vapor will constantly be evaporating part of
the entrapped liquid thus lowering the level of the puddles Pi and Pi by
some amount. Eventually an equilibrium will be reached at a riven set of
operating conditions and when this occurs, the instruments can be
calibrated accordingly.
Fog. 2 represents the opposite situation from that of Fig. l in
that the llquid-gas system is now cold instead of hot. As such, there is
no reason to protect and isolate the instrumentation from direct access to
the gaseous phase which, in this instance, is not harmful. Quite the
contrary, direct access to the instrumentation should be assured and this
is accomplished as shown by lilting the probe downwardly such that the
liquid pools Al and Q2 form in the tail end of the probe. The level of
these pools of fluid are, like Pi and Pi determined by the location of tail
end ports 36T and 38T. These pools Al and Q2 do not affect instrument
calibration.
As was the case with the hot liquid-gas mounting method forming
the subject matter of Fig. 1, the downward lilt angle shown in Fig. 2 has
been exaggerated for illustrative purposes and, as a matter of fact, the
system would function quite satisfactorily if the degree of tilt were
somewhere approximating half that shown. Quite obviously, the amount of
fluid retained in the lower chamber 30 below impact port 36T at the angle
of downward tilt found in Fig. 2 would be but a few drops.
finally, before going on to Fig 3, some mention should be made of
what method is used in mounting the probe in other than vertical runs of
pipe as far as the liquid-gas two or multiple-phase systems are concerned.
Actually, the mounting technique in, for example, a horizontal run of pipe
- 14 -
77~
becomes much simpler in both the hot arid cold multi-phase situations since
the axis or centerline of the probe can be placed upon a diameter of the
pipe rather what being tilted up or down relative thereto. Specifically in
the case of the hot liquid-gas system, it a horizontal run of pipe the axis
of the probe should be placed as nearly as possible in a vertical plane
such that its head end is at least 10 lower than its tail end. Looking at
this another way, its head end can be mowed up in either direction from the
nadir of the pipe through an angle on anything less than approximately
80. Simpler yet is the cold liquid-gas situation since, because the head
lo must be above the tail end anyway, it is easiest to mount the probe just as
it would be mounted in a single-phase system, i.e. with its axis coincident
with a vertically-disposed diameter of the pipe. It could, of course, be
tilted to one side or the other so long as its head remained at least 10
or so above its tail end but to do so unnecessarily complicates the
mounting procedure unless some other reason exists for doing so such as,
for example, space limitations.
Referring next to Fig. 3, it can be seen that in the particular
form shown, the sensor portion 18 of the probe is made up of an outer
tubular sleeve or sheath 48 into which is inserted a pair of substantially
identical smaller tubular inserts AYE and 50~. The sheath 48 is shown to
be generally square in cross section with the inserts having the shape of
isosceles triangles. The leading and trailing edges of the sheath 40 and
42 are preferably radiuses as previously described as are the side
edges 52R and 52L which form the flow separation zones soon to be described
in connection with lug. 4, but to a lesser degree. The bases AYE and 56B
of the triangular inserts cooperate to define partition wall 34 while the
legs 58R, 58L, 60R and 60L thereof abut the inside walls of the sheath in
- 15 -
, . , , , , , , . , , _ .,, , . ... --. . , . . , .. _ _ ., _ _ _ _ _ .. . . .. . . . ... .
:~232~'78
close-fitting face-to-face relation as Sheehan. Insert with other than the
triangular shape shown can also be used such as, for example, rectangular
ones which Gould place the partition wall 34 in positron bisecting the
square sheath midway between its corners rather than on a diagonal.
Wherever the partitlou wall is located, it must isolate the pressures in
the two chambers from one another. Preferably, of course, they should both
be as large as can be accommodated within the confines of the sheath but
they need not necessarily be either the tame size or the same shape.
Simplicity of manufacture and waking the unit bidirectional suggest,
however, that a symmetrical configuration of some sort be adopted as shown.
Lastly, looking at the diagram of fig. 4, it will be observed that
the side edges (52R and AL in Fig. 3) of the sensor portion 18 which
constitutes the bluff body that separates the flow are slightly radiuses,
such radius having been designated by the letter "r". The distance
separating these side edges or flow separation zones has been referred to
as byway and has been defined previously. Applicants have discovered that,
while sharply-contoured side edges produce the most clearly-defined flow
separation zones, they are not a necessity since virtually no lessening in
the accuracy of the pressures sensed by the instrument or any significant
reduction in the strength of the signal can be detected when the ratio
defined by dividing the radius of these flow separation zones "r" by the
distance byway separating same does not exceed a value of 0.2. By having
this degree of latitude in the sharpness required in these flow separation
zones, expensive machining and finishing operations are avoided and simple
roll-forming techniques using deformable tube stock can be substituted
therefore at great reductions in cost.
- 16 -
, ., . , . .
