Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
7Z3 ~3
BACXGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1 1. Field of the Invention
- me present invention relates generally to aircraft
autamatic flight control systems and more specifically to the
capturing and control of a precomputed descent path.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Most cammercial transport aircraft, general aviation
aircraft, and military aircraft are equipped with an automatic
flight control system. ~utomatic flight control systems generally
provide the human pilot with the capability of altering the flight
path of the aircraft.
Many of these aircrat are equipped with either Performance
- or ~light Management systems. These systems are generally
interfaced with the automatic flight control system in such a way as
to be able to control the flight path of the aircraft. This
capability therefore allows the control of the aircraft to either a
desired SFeea or altitude by adjustiny its flight path to an
appropriat~ value.
The aforementioned ~erformance and Flight Management
systems often determine a computed descent path and speed to a
~0 predetermined geographical location. m e calculation of these
- descent paths necessarily requires assumptions about the winds that
will be encountered during the descent since the exact nature is
unknown. Thus, winds that differ significantly from those assumed
will cause the aircraft to de~iate fram the optimum path and thereby
eitner under or o~erfly the desired geograp~ical location.
~hus, it is desirable to devise some method of control that
will ~apture and maintain the computed descent path. The method
used in the prior art is to determine the difference between the
aircrat altitude a~d ~he altitude vf the descent path at the same
point, ~her~by determiDing an altitude or path error. Ihis error is
tnen used ~o adjust the flight path angle of ~he aircraft,until the
72~
-2- 72519-3
error is null in the well known method of feedback control
systems.
In essence, this scheme is an altitude hold control
la~ wherein the commanded altitude is continually decreasing.
As the speed of the aircraft is not controlled directly, either
excessively fast or slow speeds may occur during the corrections
back to the computed path. To assure the aircraft does not
exceed its performance capabilities, it is necessary to continu-
ously monitor the speed of the aircraft and abandon the path
correction feature and control the speed of the aircraft within
acceptable limits should the speed of the aircraft approach its
performance limits. Thus, such schemes are necessarily complex
and entail the incorporation of altitude error and speed error
control laws and a suitable means of switching between the two.
Furthermore, it is generally necessary to have a different
control la~ for capturing the path than is used for tracking
the path since the capturin~ of a path is usually a much more
dynamic maneu~er than trac~ing.
The ~resent invention overcomes the shortcomings of
o the prior art by utilizing an incremental speed command to
cause con~ergence to and tracking of the computed descent path.
~s noted, Performance and Flight ~lanagement systems generally
compute both a descent path and a nominal speed for descent.
The present in~ention increases or decreases the co~manded
speed as a function of descent path error. Furthermore, the
incremental speed to ~e added to the nominal descent speed is
rate limited in such a ~a~ as to minimize any objectionable
pitch maneu~ers.
~UC~II'I~Y OF THE INVENTI ON
3Q The present in~ention pro~ides means for automatic
capturirg and t~acking of a comput~d descent flight path for an
~7~8
-3- 72519-3
aircraft by increasing or decreasing the nominal descent speed
to cause convergence to the computed path. In an aircraft
flight control system including means for controlling air-
craft pitch attitude and means for providing signals representa-
tive of desired descent path altitude, actual altitude, air-
craft forward speed, speed of source, nominal descent speed,
the invention comprises: means for providing a first signal
representative of a difference between said aircraft actual
altitude and said desired descent path altitude, means for
multiplying said first signal by a predetermined value to
provide a second signal representative of an incremental for-
ward speed, means for providing a third signal representative
of an algebraic sum of said second signal and said nominal
descent speed signal, and means for providing an output signal
representative of a di~erence between said third signal and a
fourth signal representative of a function of said aircraft
~orward speed.
BRI~3~ DESCRIPTI:ON O~ TXE DRA~INGS
Figure 1 is a yraph of altitude versus distance
illustrating a typical computed descent ~light path and the
assumed ~inds used in the computation. Superimposed on the
gr~o~n is the actual descent flight path of the aircraft based
on the actual winds encountered, the latter also being s~per-
imposed on the illustrative assumed ~inds.
Figure ~ is a graph o~ altitude versus distance
illustratin~ a case o the aircraft beginning its descent sign-
i~icantl~ be~ond the c~puted beginning o~ descent point with
n~ ~ind.
Figure 3 is a ~lock diagram of the present invention
72~3
-3a- 72519-3
showing how the incremental airspeed is calculated, rate
limited and added algebraically to the nominal descent speed
command to cause the aircraft to converge onto the computed
descent flight path.
Figure 4 is a graph similar in nature to Figure 1
illustrating the action of the present invention in maintaining
the computed descent flight path.
Figure 5 is a graph similar in nature to Figure 2
illustrating the action of the present invention in capturing
and maintaining the computed descent flight path when the air-
craft begins its descent significantly beyond the computed
beginning of descent point.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The present invention is useful in any Performance or
Flight Management system or other system that computes a descent
pa~h for an aircraft to follow from its cruise altitude to any
desired geographical point at a lower altitude and that is fully
coupled to an automatic ~light control or flight director
s~s~em.
?0 Re~erring to Figure lr the computed descent path, 3,
is a line ~ased upon the desired aescent speed of the aircraft
and the assumed ~inds. Typically, the assumed winds are based
on a linear
~7~
1 decay of the wind measured at cruise altitude~ 'rhis is represented
on Figure 1 by reference numeral 8 wherein the length of the arrows
represent the magnitude of the wind at various altitudes.
The intersection of the computed descent path 3 with the
cruise altitude defines the beginning oi descent point 2. At this
point, the aircraft should begin its descent at the nominal speed
with the throttles at idle power. If the assumed winds are very
nearly equal to the actual winds encountered, the aircraft would
then descent along the computed descent path 3 until it reaches the
desired end of descent point 6. However, should the actual winds
differ significantly from those assumed, as for example the actual
winds represented by the large arrows, 9, superimposed over the
assumed winds, 8, the actual flight path of the aircraft will follow
curve 4, andl thus miss the desired end of descent point 6.
At any given point during the descent, as for example point
5, a path error may be computed. The path error, defined as ~h, is
derived by subtracting th/e actual altitude of the aircraft from the
la~itude of the computed descent path at the same point.
Significant path errors may also develop in the absence of
winds. Referring now to Figure 2, the ccmputed flight path 13 will
intersect the cruise altitude of the aircraft, 10, at point 11, thus
defining the conputed beginning of descent point as described
above. It is not uncammon for the keyinning of a descent to be
delayed because of Air Traffic Control restrictions. ~hus, the
aircraft may have to maintain its cruise altitude, 10, for some
distance beyond the ccmputed descent point 11 and to finally begin
its descent at point 12. Flying at the desired speed, the
aircraft's actual flight path, 14, will parallel the computed
descent path 13 and hence the aircraft will fly beyond the desired
end of descent point 16.
~ he present invention provides means for automatically
compensating for path error that may occur due to either of the
72~
--5--
1 previously discussed causes or for any other reason. The invention
takes advantage of the fact that an aircraft in descent will descend
more quickly with an increase in speed and conversely will descent
- less quickly with a decrease in speed. Thus, in the case where the
aircraft is above the computed descent path, increasing its speed
above the nominal will tend to make the aircraft descend more
quickly and hence cause it to converge toward the computed flight
path.
mus, an incremental speed command may be calculated that
is proportional to the magnitude of the path error ~ h. This
incremental speed error may be algebraically added to the nominal
descent speed com~and to cause the aircraft to increase or decrease
its speed about the nominal and thus result in the aircraft
converging with the computed path and hence arriving at the desired
end of descent point. A further refinement of the present invention
may be obtained by rate limiting the incremental speed conmand. The
cenefits of rate limit~ng may be appreciated from the following
discussion.
~ssume that the aircraft is significantly above the
~ co~puted descent path and that a proportional incremental increase
in sFeea is comeuted. As the a-rcraft begins to accelerate to the
~w speed~ that is the nominal plus the incremental speed, it will
neoessarily increase its ràte of descent. miS will cause a
decrease in the path error and thus a decrease in the proportional
incremental s~eed command. The aircraft~ llthen have to decelerate
toward the n2w lesser ccmputed speed. As it decelerates, its rate
o descent wnll decreasP and the path error will thus increase,
causin~ an increase in ~he incremental speed comnand once more. The
~escribed action can cause an o~jectionable oscillatory tendency in
3~ ~he actual flight path of the aircraft ~hich is eliminated by rate
limiting the incre~Rntal spe~d c~mma~d.
72~3
--6--
1 The derivation of the rate limiter is further obtained from
the steady state longitudinal equation of motion of aircraft:
(T-D)/W = h/v + v/g (1)
~here
T = the thrust of the aircraft in pounds
~D = the drag of the aircraft in pounds
W = the weight of the aircraft in pounds
h = the rate of descent of the aircraft in feet per second
v = the true airspeed of the aircraft in feet per second
v = the change in airspeed with time (i.e., acceleration)
in f~et per second
g = the gravitational constant,32.17 feet per second
The thrust of the engine~s) at idle power is very nearly
zero, the drag of the aircraft for relatively small changes in
airsEeed is very nearly constantl and the weight of the aircraft
does not change significantly in aescent. Ihus, the left side of
~quation (1) is very nearly constant, and for a typical modern
com~ercial jet, the left side of equation (1) may be replaced by
~7.
Using the value of .~7, it bein~ realized that the solution
to the c~mplete left hand expression could also be used, the above
eguation may ~e simplified to:
.~7 = h~v ~ v~g (2)
me term v/g is relatively small compared to h/v and may
thus be ignored in this derivation Consequently, the equation may
be further simplifiad to
.~7 = h~v (3)
~ne a`~o~e ~qu~tion ~es~ribes the relationship between the
descent rate a~d ~rue airspeed of the aircraft. Letting the
subscript 1 denote the at n~minal descent speed and on the computed
~escen~ pa~h condition and ~he subscript 2 denote any other
- ~onditi~n~ the ~b~e quotation may be solved for h and two general
~l 2~a7~8
1 equations written:
hl = 07Vl
h2 = ~ 07V2
Subtracting the former equation fr~n the latter gives:
., c
h2 - hl = 07(V2 -V2) (6)
.
Defining ~h = h2 - hl and ~ v = v2 - vl and substituting in the
above ~quation gives:
ah = .07 ~v (7)
where hh is the convergence rate to the ccmputed descent path due
to a change in true airsFeed, ~v. As Mach number is a ccmmon
speed mesurement on modern aircraft, it may be used in the above
equation by using the relationship:
~v = a ~ M (8)
where
~v = the incremental airspeed in feet per second
a = the speed of sound in feet per second at the
actual altitude of the aircraft
-- ~ ~ = the increment.al Mach number
Substituting yields:
2n ~ h = .07a ~ M (g)
mus, an incremental Mach number that is proportional to a
~ath error ~h will cause a convergence rate ~h to the computed
- oa~h according to e~uation 19).
~s previously stated, the incremental Mach num~er is
proportional to the path error~ ~h:
~ y ~ h
hhere
M = the incremental Mach num~er,dimensionless
~1 = a constant of proportionality, in l/feet
~h ~ the difference between the actual altitude of the
aireraft and the altitude of the computed descent
path at a gi~en distance from the end of
--8--
1 descent point, in feet.
Taking the derivative of equation (10) with respect to time gives:
~ M = KM A h ~11)
where
M = time rate of change of the incremental Mach
number, in l/sec.
KM = a constant of proportionality, in l/feet.
h = the descent path convergence rate, in feet per
second
Solving equation (11) for ~ h and substituting into equation (10)
yields:
~ M/KM = .07a ~ M (12)
Solving for ~ M yields:
~ M = .07aKM ~ M (13)
Equation (13) is the expression for determining the rate
limit on the incremental Mach number. By way of example, assume the
value of "a" equals 1016 feet per second "KM" equals .000075, and
the aircraft is 500 feet above the camputed descent path. ~ h is
therefore 500 feet and the incremental Mach number to be added to
the nominal descent speed is KM ~ h or 0u0375. Fram equation (9),
this value will result in a steady state convergence rate to the
computed descent path of 2.7 feet per second or 160 feet per
minute. From equation (13), this is equivalent to a ~ M rate of
.0002 Mach per second. Therefore, algebraically adding the
incremental Mach number at a rate of .0002 Mach per second to the
naminal descent speed will yield a consistent 2.7 feet per second
convergence to the computed descent path both during the
acceleration to and achievement of the new descent speed. As the
aircraft approaches the camputed descent path, the path error, ~ h,
will, of course, decrease. This action results in a reduction in
both the p~th convergence rate and the incremental Mach. As the
aircraft decelerates to the lesser new speed it will,-by the action
_9_
1 described by equation (]3), maintain the appropriate path
convergence rate.
It will be appreciated fr~m the foregoing that the overall
action of the rate limit on the incremental Mach results in an
exponential achievement of the computed descent path by virtue of the
maintenance of a convergence rate consistent with the path error,
l~ h. Such a scheme minimizes the oscillatory tendencies
aforementioned by eliminating the relatively short term dynamics of
accelerating or decelerating the aircraft to a new descent speed.
The present invention may be implemented using conventional
analog circuit and computational techniques or by using conventional
wholly digital techniques or by using conventional hybrid
digitayanalog techniques. To simplify the understanding of the
invention, it will be explained by using a generally analog format
as shown in Figure 3, it being understood that the s~-me analog
format may also represent, in block diagram form, the program of a
programmable digital computer wherein the various analog inputs are
converted to digital signals for digital processing and the various
digital outputs are converted to analog signals for driving the
control surface servomotors and the like.
Referring to Figure 3, assume the aircraft has begun
descending flightr either initialized by the human pilot or by
automatic means. Switch blade 49 will then move from its shown
position and make contact with terminal 50. Simultaneously
conventional air data computer 20 supplies a signal proportional to
the actual altitude of the aircraft, hA on lead 30 and thence to
conventional summation device 32. A signal proportional to the
altitude of the computed descent path, hC appears on lead 31 and
thereby is impressed on summation device 32. Conventional summation
device 32 operates in such a fashion as to supply the difference
between the actual altitude of the aircraft and the altitude of the
computed descent path, ~ h, to lead 33 and thence to conventional
7~
--10--
1 gain block 41.
Conventional gain block 41 multiplies the signal on lead 33
by the value of KM as for example .000075. ~t will be seen that KM
is identical with that shown in equation (10) and furthermore that
the output of gain block 41 is an incremental Mach number equal to
KM ~ h in accordance with equation (10).
The output of gain block 41 is coupled to limiter 42 which
limits the magnitude of the incremental Mach between positive and
negative values, as for example + .05 ~ M. miS limitation
precludes excessively high or low speeds. The output of limiter 42
appears on lead 43 and thence to lead 40 and 44. Lead 44 supplies
the signal proportional to the incremental Mach number to rate
limiter 45, whose action will be described.
Lead 40 supplies the incremental Mach signal to
conventional absolute value taker 53. Absolute value taker 53
outputs a signal equal to the magnitude of the input with a positive
sign. me output of absolute value taker 53 is impressed on
conventional gain block 54 which multiplies the impressed value by
the value of KM. The output of gain block 54 is a signal
proportional to KM times the absolute value of the incremental Mach
and is impressed on conventional gain block 55. Gain block 55
multiplies the impressed signal by .07. The output of gain block 55
appears on lead 56 and is a signal proportional to the term
07KM ~ M. The signal on lead 56 is impressed on conventional
multiplier 58 which receives on lead 57 from conventional air data
computer 20 a signal proportional to the speed of sound, a. The
multiplier outputs the prcduct of a and the impressed signal. `The
output of multiplier 58 is the solution of equation (13), thereby
defining the rate at which the incremental Mach number is to be
added to the nominal descent speed. me signal on led 59 is
impressed on limiter 60. Limiter 60 constrains its output between
~ two selected values, as for example .00001 nad .0005. Impressed
2~3
--11--
1 values within these limits are output without modification. The
output of limiter 60 appears on led 61 and is supplied to rate
limiter 45 as an input.
Rate limiter 45 functions in the followng manner. Assume
that the value of the signal on lead 44 change instantaneously from
one value to another, as for example from 0 to .03 ~ M. Accordingly,
the signal appearing on lead 61 will be the solution to equation
(13) or .07K a times .03. For values of RM equal .00075 and a equal
1016, ~ M equals m .00016. The rate limiter output which appears
on lead 46 would increase from 0 to .03 at a rate of .00016 d M per
second, thus requiring 187.5 seconds to achieve the value of the
input on lead 44 of .03. A similar action would occur for
subsequent changes of the value on lead 44.
The output of the rate limiter appearing on lead 46 is,
impressed on switch contact 47 and subsequently through switch blade
49, switch contact 50 to conventional summation device 63.
The nominal descent speed ccmand Mc appears on lead 62 nd
thence to summation device 63. The output of conventional summation
device 63 is the algebraic sum of the impressed signals and
therefore the sum of the nominal descent speed command and the
incremental Mach command. The output of summation device 63 is
impressed on limiter 64. Limiter 64 also receives the values of the
maximum and minim~m allowable Mach n~bers on leads 666 and 65
respectively. These values may be prestored values within a digital
computer or stored in conventional analog circuitry. ~imiter 64
operates in such a manner as to constrain the output on lead 67
between the maximum and minimum values supplied on leads 66 and 65
respectively. Impressed values within these limits appear on lead
67 unmodiEied. It will be clear that the value appearing on lead 67
is thus a new descent speed ccmmand consisting of the nominal
descent speed and an incremental Mach number proportional to path
error that is constrained between the maximum and minimum allowable
-12-
1 Mach numbers.
Conventional air data computer 20 supplies a signal
proportional to the aircraft's Mach number on lead 21 and thence to
conventional summation device 28 via led 27 and to conventional rate
taker 24 via lead 23. The output of rate taker 24 is a signal
proportional to the time rate of change of Mach number, shown in the
Figure as M. The output of rate taker 24 is impressed on
conventional gain block 25 whose action is to multiply the impressed
signal by the value of Kl, a typical value being 3.0~
A signal proportional to KlM is thence supplied to
conventional summation device 28 via lead 26. Conventional
summation device 28 forms the algebraic sum of the terms M + KlM nad
supplies the signal to lead 29 and thence to conventional summation
device 68.
Lea~ 67 couples the output of limiter 64 to conventional
summation device 68. Summation device 68 takes the difference
between the signals appearing on lads 67 and 29, the output
appearing on lead 69. The signal appearing on lead 6~ is thus the
difference between the newly computed descent speed and the
summation of the actual Mach number of the aircraft and its Mach
rate.
~he signal on lead 69 is impressed upon conventional gain
block 70 whose function is to multiply the impressed signal by the
value of Kv. The value of Kv is such as to convert the impressed
signal to a proportional voltage to drive pitch servomotor 76. The
output of gain block 70 appears on lad 71 and is supplied to
conventional summation device 74.
Signals proportional to the pitch angle and pitch rate 80
of the aircraft are supplied to summation device 74 via lead 73 in
the conventional manner. The output signal of summation device 74
is applied to servomotor 76 which, through the mechanical linkage
- 77, moved the aircraftls elevator or horizontal stabilizer, 78.
a'7~
-13-
1 Mechanical linkage 79 supplies summation device 74 with a signal
proportional to elevator or horizontal stabilizer position 50 that
the signal on lead 75 is reduced to null in the stead~ state
conditio~.
The action of the present invention may be understood by
referring to Figure 4. Figure 4 is similar in nature to Figure 1
except that the present invention is used to control the descent
flight path of the aircraft in the manner described above. The
aircraft begins its descent from its cruise altitude 90 at point 91,
the beginning of descent point. As the aircraft descends, it will
experience actual winds, 98, different from those assumed in the
descent path computation, 97, and will therefore deviate from the
computed path 92 along the curve 93, thereby experiencing a path
error. Through the action described in Figure 3, a rate limited
incrmental Mach number will be added to the nominal descent speed to
produce a convergence back toward the computed descent path 92 until
the aircraft is back upon the computed path and the path error is
null. This occurs at point 9~. HenceEorth, small values of rate
limited incremental Mach num~ers will be added or subtracted from
the nominal descent speed to maintain the aircraft on the computed
descent path until the desired end of descent point 96 is achieved.
Figure 5, which is similar in nature to Figure 2,
illustrates the ætion of the present invention when the descent is
begun at a distance significantly different from the ccmputed
beginning of descent point. me aircraft maintains a cruise
altitude 100 until the descent is begun at po mt 102 which is
significantly beyond the ccmputed end of descent point 101. AS the
computed descent path is well below the actual altitude of the
aircraft at point 102, a large path error occurs. The present
invention computes a rate limited incremental Mach that is added to
the nominal descent speed. The increased descent speed results in a
higher rate of descent and thus produces a convergence rate to the
~2~ 8
-14-
1 computed path along the curve 104, the actual flight path of the
aircraft. Ihe aircraft continues along curve 10~ until it
intersects the computed flight path 103 at point 105. Since the
path error has continually decreased during the convergence to the
computed path, the rate limited incremental Mach has also decreased
according to the action described in Figure 3 until the descent
speed is equal to the nominal descent speed when the aircraft
intersects the computed flight path 103. Hence, the aircraft's
flight path will match the computed descent path during the line
segment 106 until the desired end of descent point 107 is achieved.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that the present
invention provides improved capturing and maintaining of a computed
descent path in the following manner:
~1) An incremental speed is computed that is proportional
to the magnitude and sign of the difference between-the aircraft's
actual altitude and the altitude of the computed descent path at the
same point.
(2) The incremental speed is rate limited in such a
fashion as to maintain a virtually constant convergence rate to the
20 _ computed path consistent with the path error.
(3) The rate limited incremental speed is algebraically
added to a supplied nominal descent speed to cause convergence to
the computed descent path in an exponential fashio.
(4) The utilization of incremental speed impressed upon a
nominal descent speed c~mmand permits simplified control over the
prior art while allowing diret control over the maximum and minimum
permissible speeds of the aircraft without additional monitoring.
