Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~25~398()
WALL ST~UCTURE FOR RETAINING WALLS AND THE LIKE
s ckqround of the Invention
This invention relate~ generally to specially
configured prefabricated structural modules for empl4yment
in the construction of walls. More particularly this
invention relates to that cla~s of wall wherein the
structural elements of the module ~orm interior cavities or
cells in which granular material is depo~ited. Thi~
enclosed granular material, through ~he action of friction
a~ainst the generally upright walls of the cells, adds its
own weight to that of the structural parts to form a m~re
effective a~sembly.
The structural modules of the present invention are
intended to be u~ed in combination with other similar
modules arranged in horizontal rows and, accordin~ to the
hei~ht required o~ the structure, in additional superposed
horizontal rows of modules each properly proportioned to
provide adequat~ stability to the as~embled structure.
More particularly the preqent invention relates to
an improved prefabricated structural module of the gensral
type ~hown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,877,236 and U.S. Pat. No.
4,372,091. These patents show stru~tural modules ~hi~h,
1~5~39&()
when assembled in combination laterally and vertically to
form a wall structure, create cellular cavities to contain
fill material which acts in concert with the wall modules
to form a gravity wall. The principal distinction between
the referenced patents lies in the method utiliz~d to
transfer the lateral components of forces acting upon the
walls.
In U.S. Pat. No. 3,877,236 the lateral forces are
transmitted by interlocking conto-~rs located in the top and
bottom surfaces of the face panels. This detail is
effective for small to moderate lateral forces, but the
stresses induced in relatively thin face panels by high--
lateral stresses in high structures cannot be economically
resisted by these methods. U.S. Pat. ~o. 4,372,091 uses a
standard rnortise and tenon interlocking key located on the
arm connecting the front and rear faces. The lateral
forces in a wall constructed with these modules cause very
hi~h bending stresses in the connecting arms, since the
mortise and tenon keys form couples which are transmitted
to the face panels. The connectin~ arms must also resist
high vertical shear stresses caused by these couples. The
bending and shear stresses so induced must be resisted
respectively by heavy longitudinal reinforcing steel and by
vertical steel usually in the form o~ stirrups. These
requirements add significantly to the cost of the modules
and hence to the final cost of the structure.
~s~9~)
An object of the present i~vention is to provide an
improvement over other prefabricated modules presently used
for wall struct~res of this type, since the modules
described in this invention are configured in such a manner
as to conform more efficiently to the location~, directions
and patterns of stresses induced in the wall assembly by
the fill material within and by the external loads acting
upon the wall. By being positioned in such a manner as to
be able to accomodate more efficiently the load~ imposed
upon it, the stability of the assembled structure is
increased. Moreover, both the intensity of the internal
stresses within the module, and the physical size of the
individual modules are reduced. This more effective
construction results in the u~e of less material in the
manufacture of the modules and, when used in a retaining
structure, requires less excavation of soil (and
consequently, less backfill material to be placed) to place
the modules in the field and to complete the structure.
All thesa factors combine to produce a much more economical
structure with improved structural integrity.
~5~39~3~
Summa~y_o _ he InYention
In order to accomplish the objectives of the present
invention, a precast structural module i~ configured as
follow~: a front panel is provided which typically is of
generally rectangular con~iguration when viewed in front
elevation. A rear panel is located with its longitudinal
axis parallel to that of said front panel, and one or a
plurality of partition means connect said front panel ~ith
said rear panel. When said modules are placed in lateral
contiguity, the front panels and rear panels form t~o
opposite longitudinal sides of a cellular chamber, with
each partition means ~erving to connect the front panel
with the rear panel, and further serving to transversely
divide the chamber into smaller individual cells.
In a particularly advantageous form of the present
invention, the partition means are of a pronouncad
generally trapezoidal hape when view0d along a horizontal
line parallel with the longitudinal axis of the ~ront
panel. (For the purpose of this application, the term
"trapezoidal" includes a parallelogram.) This trap~zoidal
shape is such that, when the mod~le is placed in its final
erected po~ition within the assembled wall structure, the
rear panel o~ a module is situated at an elevatio~
125R~38~)
considerably below a plane extending from the upper edge of
the front panel at right angles thereto, and the principal
axes of the partition means extend in a downward direction,
desirably at a~ angle of between 20 and 82 degrees ~rom the
plane of the front panel. This results in the axes of the
partition means being more nearly perpendicular to the
direction of the resultant forces acting on the wall
modules. These forces represent the combined effects of
(a) the lateral force caused by the material retained
behind the wall, and (b) the ver~ical gravity forces ~rom
the modules themselves and from the fill enclosed withi
the cellular cavities formed by the front and rear panels
and the partition means of the assembled modules.
In a wall where modules are stacked vertically, each
module beginning with the topmost module i.s acted upon by
lts respective overturning and resisting forces and
subsequently transmits those forces to the contiguous
module(s) below according to the details of the transfer
mechanism provided in the design. Such mechanisms have
heretofore consisted of commonly used interlocking means
such as mortise and tenon ~eys on connecting arms or
depended lips on the lower surfaceq of the face panels.
The use of mortise and tenon keys in the partition means
results in very heavy bending stres es in the partition
means as well as high local shearing stresses in the keys.
1~58~
The use of depending lips in the face panel3 results in
exces~ively high shearing stresses and bending in the
weaker direction of the panel. This factor seriously
limits the u~eful height of the de~ign since these stresses
when high cannot be resisted by any economically practical
~hickness of face panel or depending lips.
Since concrete, the material commonly used in the
manufacture of wall modules, i3 relatively weak in tensile
strength, bending in concrete members must be resisted by
reinforcing material, usually steel, located longitudinally
in the tension face of the member. A very significant
aspect of one form of the present invention is the ability
of the design to transmit the natural stresses o~ the
retained material and those of the resisting material
directly as compressive forces, without relocating those
forces through exces~ive and inefficient use of expensive
reinforcing materials.
- The present invention is not restricted to the use
of any particular material of construction, but concrete,
either plain or rein~orced by metal embeded therein in the
usual way, is very suitable and advantageous. The
invention utilizes most effectively and e~onomically the
very efficient natural compre~sive strength of concre~e.
-- 6 --
~5~398~
To affect this natural ability of concrete to
transmit stresses compressively, one precept of this
invention prescribes a variation of configurations of the
contact surfaces of vertically contiguous partition means,
each embodiment utilizing the advantages of a generally
sloped orientation of the contactsurfaces of the partition
means. In its simplest form, the contact surface consists
of a straight inclined plane oriented in such a way that
the total resultant forces, overturning and resisting,
exerted by the upper module upon the lower module, occur at
such an angle that ordinary frictional ~orces between the
surfaces in contact more than compen~ate for any component
of the resultant force which may occur in a direction
parallel to said contact surface~. Another form of this
invention utilizes a more positive engagement of contact
surfaces wherein alternate surfaces are angled with respect
to each other, presenting surfaces normal to any resulting
components of loading.
Description of the Drawl~
Figs. 1 and 2 are perspective views of advantageous
forms of structural modules incorporating features of the
invention.
~L~5~
Figs. 3 and 4 are cross sectional and top plan views
respectively illustrating a module of the general type
shown in Fig. 1, with parallel front and rear panels.
Figs. 5 and 6 are fragmentary cross sectional and
plan views, similar to Figs. 3 and 4, illustrating a
modification in which the rear panel i5 tilted at an acute
angle to the front panel.
Fig. 7 is a fragme~tary perspective view of an
assembled retaining wall or the like utilizing structural
modulesaccording to the invention.
Fig. 8 is a perspective view of a base of a type
which may be used in connection with a wall assembly such
as that of Fig. 7.
Fig. 9 is a cross sectional view of a preferred form
of base ~odule according to the invention having an
extended toe flange for increased resistance to overturn.
Fig. lO illustrates a modified form of structural
module, having a notched-out area for reception of a
horiæontal, ec~rth-retaining slab.
Figs. 11 and 12 are cross sectional views
illustrating d.ifferent advanta~eou~ construction techniques
utilizing the structural modules of the invention.
Fig. 13 is a diagrammatic illustration of a
structural wall utilizing the modules of the invention, for
2S force analysis purposes.
~L;2589~0
Figs. 14 and lS are cross sectional views taken on
lines 14-14 and 15-15 of Fig. 16 illustrating advantageous
forms of construction for the tops of retaining walls or
the like.
Fig. 16 is a composite cross sectional view
illustrating the construction features of Figs. 14, 15.
Fig. 17 is a fragmentary cross sectional view
illustrating another form of top structure for a retaining
wall or the like.
Fig. 18 is a cross sectional view generally on line
18-18 of Fig. 19.
Fig. 18a is a fragmentary cross sectional detail,
illustrating an advantageous form of connector for joining
a connecting panel to adjacent structural modules.
Fig. 19 is a top plan view of an arrangement for
joining so-called half modules to adjacent structural
modules by m~ans of an intermediate connecting panel.
Fig. 20 is a perspective view of a modified form of
half module having an integral stabilizing slab.
- Fig. 21 is a front elevational view of a retaining
wall or the like constructed with structural modules
according to the invention.
Figs. 22 and 22A are front elevational views of
modified forms o~ retaining wall assembly or the like
2S incorporating filler panels between adjacent, spaced
structural modules.
398~3
Figs. 23-26 are fragmentary cross sectional and top
plan views illustrating various arrangements for the
mounting and retention of filler panels in a wall assembly
of the type shown in Fig. 22.
Fig. 27 is a perspective view of an advantageous
form of dro~-in panel, which may be used at the back of the
assembly or, more typically, as an intermediate vertical
panel.
Figs. 28-30 illustrate various views of an
arrangement for mounting of the drop-in panel in an
assembly of modules.
Figs. 31 and 32 are fragmentary views in vertical
cross section illustrating advantageou~ arrangements for
ke~ing together vertically adjacent structural modules for
resistanceto shear.
Fig. 33 is a side elevation of an advantageous form
of structural module, in which the front and rear panels
are generally at the same height, joined by partition
elements stepped to provide a plurality of forward facing
abutment elements for improved resistance to shear.
Fig. 34 is a cross sectional view of an assembly of
structural modules arranged with notched-out partition
panels and with adjacent structural modules being joined by
special keying blocks or ~labs.
Fig. 35 is a perspective view illustrating a further
modified form of the invention.
-- 10 --
~5~39~30
Fig. 36 is a cross sectional view of a retaining
wall or the like of the general type shown in Fig. 35.
Figs. 37 and 38 are enlarged, fragmentary cross
sectional views, ill~strating details of thorou~h
retaining/supporting element incorporated in the assembly
of Fig. 36.
Figs. 39, 40 are perspective view~ of special
configura~ions of base module~, for used in wall as~emblies
such as shown in Figs. 35, 36.
Figs. 41 and 42 are cross sectional and top plan
views respectively of a modified structural module
configuration providing for aligned pairs of mortise
notches between vertically adjacent modules, for the
reception of keying elements.
Figs. 43 and 44 are cross sectional and top plan
viewsrespectively, similar to Figs. 41, 4~, where the
module is provided with an inclined rear panel.
Fig. 4$ is an end elevational view of a retaining
wall or the like constructed of various modified forms of
structural modules having advantageou~ load bearing
characteristics.
Figs. 46 and 47, together, constitute a cros~
sectional view of a further modified form of retaininy wall
assembly utilizing an advanta~eous form of interlocking
means between vertically adjacent modules.
12~39~(~
Fig. 48 is a cross sectional view taken on line
48-48 of Fig. g9.
Fig. 49 is a top plan view of a structural module
accordi~g to the invention which is cast in individual
components and assembled before installation.
Fig. 50 is an enlarged fragmentary cross sectional
view taken on line 50-50 of Fig. 48.
Preferred Embodiment~
Figures 1 through 6 illustrate some of the more
preferred embodiments of a module with trapezoidal
partition means. The modules comprise rectangular front and
rear panels, and trapezoidal partition elements, the upper
surfaces 4 and 5, andthe lower surfaces 6 and 7 of which
are arranged in matching sawtooth pattern capable of
positive unilateral interlocking of one module with another
when one of said moduleq is superposed upon another.
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a module 11 with a front
panel 1, a rear panel 2, and generally trapezoidal
partition elements 3. Usually, but not necessarily, there
are two spaced partition elements 3, panel-like in form.
At the intersection of the panels with the partition
elements are fillets 9 which are placed according to usual
practice.
~S~398()
Figure 2 represents a similar module 13, specially
designed, however, for use at the base of a wall assembly.
The partition elements 3A, ordinarily trapezoidal, have
been, in this particular case, truncated to allow the
bottom surfaces thereof to lie along the plane of the
wall's foundation. The rear panel 8 is shown in a special
configuration more suitable for a base module, where its
plane is perpendicular to the plane of the partition means
3A and approximately perpendicular to the plane of the
front panel 1. The rear panel 8, as shown, has a marked
advantage when used as an element of a base module. Its
horizontal orientation forms a shelf which positively -
captures the force from the weight of the fill above it,
and is located approximately at the center of action of the
resultant force combining the vertical gravity loads with
the lateral overturning load3. It is capable of behaving
as a spread footing distributing the loads from the
superposed modulesabove, and from the fill they contain.
The rear panel of any module may be either
substantially perpendicular to the ~ront panel, as in
Figure 2, substantially parallel with the front panel, as
in Fiyures 3 and 4, or inclined at an acute angle with
respect to the plane of the front panel, depending upon the
particular purpose to which it is to be applied. When a
smaller module is to be used below a larger module, at the
- 13 -
~Z589&(~
base of the wall, a rear panel 8 which is substantially
perpendicular to the front panel 1 of the module is
especially beneficial. When it is desired to use the rear
panels to assist in transferring weight between modules,
such as in a bridge abutment, it is preferred that the rear
panels 10 be parallel with the front panel 1 (Fig. 3) so
the rear panels can be readily aligned. When it is desired
to increase the forces resisting overturning it is
beneficial to tilt the rear panel 2 at an acute angle with
the front panel 1, with its upper edge farther away from
the front panel, as illustrated in Figures 5 and 6, so as
to increase the amount of fill captured, and to reduce-
simultaneously the lateral pressure exerted by the retaine~d
material behind the module.
Figure 3 clearly shows a cross sectional view of one
of many sawtooth patterns made according to the invention.
A plurality of surfaces 4 and 5 form the upper sawtooth
edge and a plurality of surfaces 6 and 7 form the lower
matching saw~oothedge. In one form of the invention,
surfaces 4 and 6 do not come in contact with each other,
and the component, parallel to the plane of the front
panel, of the resultant of all forces acting upon the
module, is carried by the front and rear panels and
transmitted to the front and rear panels of the lower
module at the panels' respective contact surfaces. The
- 14 -
. .
~L~s~9~
component, perpendicular to the plane of the front panel,
of the resultant of all forces acting upon the superposed
module is transmitted from contact surface 7 to contact
surface 5 o~ the supporting module and is carried by the
partition means 3 of the supporting module. In a preferred
form of the invention, all surfaces 6 and 7 come in contact
with their respective matching surfaces 4 and 5 and each
surface bears a proportionate amount of the component,
perpendicular to the contact surface, of the resultant of
all forces actin~ upon the module. In a further preferred
form of the invention, the modules are constructed to
dimensions which prevent the transmission of major forces
from one face panel (i.e. front or rear panels 1, 2 or 1,
10) to another. This feature minimizes the occurrence of
cracking in said panels.
Fi~ures 5 and 6 show in side view and plan view the
rear panel a tilted in a manner which increases the force
it receives from the bin-action effect of the fill within
the cells of the module while at the same ~ime reducing the
lateral force it receives from the retained material. It
produces an additionalbenefit when modules o~ the same
dimensions are stacked, one upon the other, by creating a
protruding top surface which captures the beneficial
downward force of retained material locat@d in a zone above
the protruding parts of the module. For the tilting to be
- 15 -
. ` ' ` ' ' ' ' ' ' !;', ' . `
.' ~ ' ''~' ,
,,
~5~
worthwhile, the back panel 2 should be at least about 8
degrees with respect to the front panel.
Figure 7 shows a perspective view of an assembly of
modules arranged laterally in horizontal rows with
additional horizontal rows o~ module~ superposed above.
The assembly as een in Figure 7 is of a wall -~tructure
viewed ~rom the rear. The assembly of front panels 1 form
the exterior face of the wall structure. The rear panels 2
are shown at an acute angle with respect to the plane o~
the front panels. With the exception of the base module,
each superposed module is shown with its partition means of
lesser width than the partition means of the module upon
which it is supported. This method of stacking is also
shown in cross-sectional view in Figure 11 and represents
the standard method of stacking when constructing a modular
gravity retaining wall. As shown in Figure 7 the base
module is a ~orm of the new module with its bottom portion
truncated to conform to the plane of the subgrade. The
base module is of smaller width than the module directly
superposed on it because the heel o~ the wall is the bottom
edge of the rear panel of the module resting on the base
unit and is substantially at the elevation of the ba~e
module's subgrade.
- 16 -
~2S8~38()
Fi~ure 8 shows a solid base. This type of base may
be used for smaller walls where the extra material ueed
would be less expensive than the cost of forming the empty
cells.
Figure 9 shows a base module 14 with the lower
exterior edge of its front panel extended a substantial
distance. This module, by extendiny the pivot point 48
about which the wall assembly could rotate, increases
su~stantially the wall's resistance to such rotation. This
improvement is particularly effective for walls with
trapezoidal partition mean~ and/or lowered rear panels.
In the analysis of a modular retaining wall for
stability ayainst overturning, when the wall ie one in
which modules of different size or shape occur in any
vertical stack, it is necessary to investigate the
stability of the structure above each possible pivot
point. It is readily apparent from Figure 11 that the
inclined trapezoidal shape of the partition means and
lowered position of the rear panel results in several
advantages. It subs~antially lower~ the center of gravity
of each of the stacked modules and likewise lowers the
cen~er of gravity of the granular material enclosed within
each of the cells of the modules. In that part of a wall
in which the rear face is stepped toward the front face as
- 17 -
;
: .
1~5~
the courses progress upward, the trapezoidal shape of the
p~rtition means also lowers the center of gravity of the
retained material trapped above the protruding rear portion
of the modules.
The inclined trapezoidal shape of the partition
elements and the lowe~red position of the rear panel has
another important effect on the behavior of the modular
wall. In the analysis of the complete wall, when
investigating the tendency of the bottommost module course
to overturn about the toe, or to slide along the base, the
lowered position of the rear panel has no effect, either
beneficial or detrimental. However, when analyzing the
stability of the individual courses above the bottom
course, the advantages of the new design are substantial.
Referring to Figure 13, if we perform an overturniny
analysis about point 39, the pivot point of a typical
module llC, which lies in an arbitrarily chosen upper
course of the wall, the improvements become evident. The
resultant of those forces causing overturning, as well as
the resultant of those forces affecting resistance to
overturning, are substantially lowered in elev~tion.
Although the overall magnitude of the overturning force is
increased, its effectiveness nevertheless is reduced. At
the same time, both the magnitude and the effectiveness of
the beneficial resisting forces are increased.
- 18 -
1~898~3
To illustrate in more detail th~ effect of a lowered
rear panel on the behavior of th~ force tending to cause
o~erturning, refer to Figure 13. In the analysis of a
standard wall built according to the present state of the
art, the rear panel ~5 is,within the tolerances of usual
wall batters and construction accuracies, at the same
elevation as the front panel. This condition is
illustrated by the dashed lines in Figure 13. Taking the
summation of moments about pivot point 39 the lateral
overturning force 41 caused by the retained material a~ove
the heel 40 acts at an elevation approximately one-third
the distance from the elevation of the heel 40 to the
surface g4 o~ retained material. In contrast, in the
analysis of the wall built according to the teachings of
the present invention shown by solid lines in Fisure 13,
when we take the summation of moments about the same pivot
point 39, the lateral overturning force now consists of the
combined effects of the same overturning force 41, plus the
overturning ~orce 43 due to the additional volume of
retained material between point 40 and the new heel 42.
The additional force 43, although increasing the total
horizontal force against the wall, actually has a
stabilizing effect since its line of action lies below the
elevation of the p~vot point 39. Thus the total effective
overturning moment is in fact reduced, and the size and
_ ~,9 _
~eight of the wall structure including module llC and those
modules above it may be reduced in size, thereby affecting
a more economical construction.
In the analysis of overturning conditions for the
entire wall it is necessary to evaluate moments about the
base at pivot point 47 (representiny the pivot point
location in a standard wall). Since the heel ~6 of the
entire wall is at the same elevation as pivot point 47,
there is no benefit from the trapezoidal partition means,
and the overturning condition is the same for the standard
wall and for the wall according to the invention. When the
base module is fabricated with its lower edge extended
forward from the face, forming the pivot point at 48 (see
Figs. 9, 11), overturning moments are reduced, and
resisting moments are increased.
Figure 12 illustrates an assembly of modules
according to the invention arranged in a more beneficial
sequence of sizes. In this type of stacking, the rear
panel 2a of module llA, which extends farthe~t away from
the front panel, is located a substantial di~tance above
the elevation of the base module 14. The rear panel 2A
acts to protect each of the rear panels beneath it from the
full effects of the retained material. The overall effect
is to reduce substantially the amount of material used to
- 20 -
398(~
collstruct the wall and to require substantially less
material (e.g. earth) to be removed prior to construction.
A wall with less required height can be built using the
same principle, in which case module llB might be the
farthest extending module with all superposed modules of
smaller size.
Fi~ures 11 and 12 also show the location of an
auxiliary feature which is detailed in Figure 10. This is
a prefabricated slab or plank 49 which can be placed
between contact surfaces 4 and 6 of superposed partition
elements. To incorporate the slab49 in an assembled
structure, either or both surfaces 4, 6 must be molded in
such a manner that adequate space i5 allowed. If the
proper space is allowed, the partition means will behave
the same a-q it would without the space, but an additional
beneficial action is obtained. The slabs 49, extending
into the fill material contained in the cells of the
modules, form qhelf-like members which enga~e the weight of
fill material above in a more positive ~anner than does the
bin-action against vertically extending panels and
partitions.
Thus, the slab 49 increases the ability Qf the fill
~aterial to act in concert with the cellular wall
structure. Slab 49 may be made to span between adjacent
- 21 -
589~()
partition means or to cantilever from both sides of a
partition means. The most preferred method would be to
span between two or more partition means and to cantilever
at each end, reaching approximately half the distance to
the next partition means.
In Figures 14, 15 and 16 there are shown two methods
of constructing the tops of walIs. The top-most front
panel shown is a cantilevered panel 17 or 18 with offset
arms 20 set vertically behind the front panel 1 of a
module. The vertical load from the panel i~ transmitted to
the top of the front panel 1 by bottom surface 19 of the
offset shoulder. Horizontal loads against the top portion
of the cantilevered panel are recisted by cantilever action
of the panel with the restraining thrustsupplied by ~hrust
blocks. Two forms of thrust blocks are shown. In Figure
14 the thrust block is shown in the form of a plug 21,
which may be prefabricated or cast in place, and which
extends rearward to the inner face of the rear panel 10.
In Figure 15 the thrust block 16 i8 attached to the
partition means 3, either integrally or by connectin~
means.
Figure 16 is a cross-sectional view looking forward-
at the rear faces of the cantilevered panel and of t~e
front panel. The left portion of Figure 16 shows the
- 22 -
,, ., - ' `~
,
constructio~ as in Figure 14, while the right portion of
Figure 16 shows the construction as in Figure 15. The
rightmost partition means shown in Figure 16 is shown
prepared to receive a cantilevered panel. Cantilevered
panels are more economical to construct than are cellular
modules and may be shaped for special applications such as
parapets and may include special shapes as for traffic
barriers. Cantilevered panels are able to protrude further
above the finished grade and their top edge may be
fabricated at an angle with re~p0ct to the horizontal to
conform to a specified grade (See Figs. 21, 22).
Cantilevered panels 17 may be used in lieu of a top module
in walls whether or not parapets are required.
Figure 17 illustrates a top unit 23 in the form of a
V-shaped cantilever. This unit also may be used in lieu of
a top module where a parapet is not required, as shown in
Figuresll, 12 and ~7, or it may be used as shown in Figure
17 where it is indicated as a parapet with an integral
traffic barrier. The vertical and horizontal loads from
unit 23 are transmitted to the top module by ribs 26
fabricated along the soffit of the inclined slab 24. Ribs
26 are fabricated with contact sur~aces 6 and 7 which
conform to the contour of the tops of partition means 3 of
modules 11. Thus these forces are transmitted in the same
manner as they are from superposed module to supporting
- ~3 -
~5~9~
module in a basic wall structure with a ~awtooth pattern in
the joints of the partition means. Resistance to
overturning is provided to the top unit 23 by the weight of
fill supported by slab 24. Whenever it is desired to
S provide additional stability to unit 23, the lab 2~ may be
extended as indicated by 25. Since extending slab 24
causes the edge to descend deeper into the ~ill as well as
rearward, it can be seen that the V-shape o~ unit 23 is
more effecti~e than an L-shaped uni~ would be. The
V-shaped unit also allows more space for underground
structures such as utility structures.
Figure~ 17 and 18 show prefabricated rear slabs 32,
33 and 34. Slab 32 is planar while slab 33 has a depending
flange and slab 34 has an ascending flange. Slabs 32, 33
and 34 are able to positively engage the retained material
above them in a location which is the most beneficial, tha
rear of the module.
Figure 21 shows a front elevation of a wall
assemblyusing modules 11 and cantilevered panels 17. The
modules are arranged to stagger the vertical joints so that
each superposed module, where possible, is supported by two
different modules in the course below it. To accomplish
this preferred interlocking pattern, the partition means
are spaced apart at virtually twice the distance from the
- 2~ -
,
~L~58~38()
partition means to the lateral edge of the front panel 1 of
modules 11. The center lines 35 of a few adjacent
partition means are shown. As can be seen, this spacing
allows all the partition means to occur in continuous
planes from top to base as required in the invention, and
also allows the lateral edges of the front panels
essentially to touch.
It is often necessary in the construction of a wali
to provide continuous vertical joints at certain locations
such as: expansion joints, turning points where the
direction of the wall changes, locations where it is
desirable to change horizontal joint elevations, and
settlement joints where there is a significant change in
the expected settlement of a foundation. Such a joint 60
is shown in Figure 21. Because of the pattern where each
module overhangs half of a module immediately below it, it
i-s necessary to provide half-modules 12 adjacent to the
joint in alternating courses as indicated.
Figure 20 shows a half-module 12. Since the module
possesses only one partition mean~, it iq necessary to
provide alaterally stabili~ing mechanism. One such
mechanism is shown in Figure 20. A slab 30 dimensioned to
bear on a contact surface 4 is cantilevered from the
half-module's partition means 3. A gusset panel 31 is
- 25 -
3L~5~3~38(~
provided for rigidity and strength. In the full size
module 11 adjacent to the half-module 12, one o~ the
contact surfaces 6 is cast at a higher elevation than is
normal to provide for the thickness of slab 30. When slab
30 is locked between the partition means of two modules,
half-module 12 is laterally stabilized against rotation.
An alternate method of lateral stabilization is
illustrated in Figures 18 and 19 where a lateral diaphragm
panel 27, generally vertically disposed, is provided to
span betweeD the partition means of the half-module to the
nearest partition means o~ the adjacent module. The
diaphragm panel 27 is connected to the partition means by
threaded inserts 28 and connectors 2g, of a type similar to
those shown in Figure 18A.
Figure 22 shows a new and improved arrangement i~
the assembly of cellular modules llS. Partition means are
spaced as shown by center lines 35, except that, in the
~rrangement in Figure 22, the spa~ing between the partition
elements is substantially greater than twice the distance
from the partition elements to the lateral edge of the
front panels lS~ This pattern results in significant
benefits. When the partition means are erected in vertical
alignment with the left partitionmeans of each superposed
module llS supported by the right partition means of the
- 26 -
1~5~3"3~()
module below it, and the right partition means supported by
the left partition mean~ below it, a substantial space is
left between adjacent front panels lS and adjacent rear
panels. This space is filled by a drop-in face panel 36
between front panels and a drop-in panel 51 at the rear of
the space between modules. Panel 51 may be parallel to the
front panels or set at an angle thereto. The rear drop-in
panel ~ay be secured by a device such as the detail of
bearing surface and ribs shown in Figures 28, 29 and 30.
The ribs 54 shown in Figure 29 may be tilted to accomodate
an inclined drop-in panel 51. This unique arrangment
increases the face area of the wall approximately 50
percent per module. The improved arrangement of modules
shown in Figure 22 may also be used with equal advantage in
the assembly of modules with non-trapezoidal partition
means.
Since it is more economical to fabricate and place
the planar panels 36 and to strengthen the modules for the
~additional loading, than to construct additional modules
for the equivalent area, the cost savings realized are
substantial. Planar panels have an additional advantage in
that they may be cast flat and therefore are less expensive
to mold, easier to cast with t~xtured sltr~ace 36~ or in
bas-relief as are panelq lT of modules llS. The panels may
be recessed behind the front panels lS as are drop-in
~s~
panels 36R or may protrude forward of the front panels lS
as do drop-in panels 36P. These treatments produce
decorative shadows on the face of the wall and improve the
appearance of the stru~ture, especially in the case of
large face areas. Shadow effects may also be produced by
texturing or casting three dimensional patterns on the
front panels lS of the modules llS as shown in Figure 22.
A similar effect may be obtained in front panels 1 of
modules 11 (Fig. 21~.
Figure 22 show~ various aesthetic improvements which
may be used to interrupt the monotony of a wall surface,
especially one of relatively large area. The pattern of
front panels shown in Figure 22 may be changed in various
other ways to improve appearance. One such method, shown
in Fig. 22A, would be to cast the front panels 101 in the
form of parallelograms (as seen when viewed in front
elevation) preserving horizontal top and bottom edges. If
alternate front panels were first right-leaning and then
left-leaning, the space created betw~en them would be in
the form of a trapezoid in the plane of the front panels.
Figure 22A shows a front elevation of a wall with
parallelogram-shaped front panels 101 and trape20idal
filler panels 102 secured in a manner similar to that
holding drop-in panels 36F, 36P, 36R and 36T in Figures 2
through 26.
- 28 -
~S~398~
Methods of securing the drop-in panels are shown in
Figures 23, 24, 25 and 26. A recessed drop-in panel 36R is
shown in ~ross sectional view in Figure 23 and in sectional
planview Figure 24. It is supported vertically on the top
sur~ace of front panel lS, is restrained from moving
rearward during erection by lugs 37, and is further
supported laterally before and after the ~ill is placed
inside the cell, by the shear-transfer joints 50. Figures
25 and 26 show a similar method of securing a drop-in
panel. In the example shown a flush drop-in panel 36F, is
temporarily secured rearwardly by loose dowels 38 placed in
matching holes cast in the partition means. --
In certain large modules, it may be desirable to
include one or more dividing intermediate panels behind thefront panel to improve the ability of the cellular
structure to capture the weight of the fill material. Such
panels may be either parallel to or inclined with respect
to the front panel and may be either cast integrally with
the modules or of drop-in design. An improved form of
drop-in panel 51 is shown in Fig. 27 and is provided with
tapered bearing surfaces 52 which rest on matching tapered
bearing surfaces 53 loca~ed in notched brack~ts on the
sides of the partition means of selected modules. The
panel S1 is restrained laterally by the ribs 54 which
extend almost the full height of the panels. The detail
- 29 -
,
~5~981)
shown provides ~or efficient lateral restraint and transfer
of vertical loading. Drop-in panel 51 may also be used as
a drop-in rear panel in walls assembled as ~hown in
Figure 22.
It is more beneficial to capture the weight of the
fillmaterial at the rear of a module than to capture an
equivalent weight of fill material at the front of the
module because of the dif~erence in moment arm. By moving
a drop-in panel located between the front panel and rear
panel of a module rearwardly or by tilting it so ~hat its
top i5 closest to the front panel and its bottom is closest
to the rear of the module, the bin-action of the rear cell
formed by the panel is improved while the bin-action of the
cell forward of the panel is reduced. Hence overall
stability of a module can be improved by proper placing and
tilting o~ the drop-in panels.
When the rear panel of a module is located
sufficiently forward of the rear panels of modules below so
that the tilting of the rear panel has no effect on the
magnitude or direction of the overturning ~orce exerted by
the retained material against the entire wall structure,
then it is appropriate to tilt the panel forward so a~ to
cause the direction of ~he force exerted by the retained
material against the rear panel of this module to be
- 30 -
125~98~
located at a more vertical angle and to be greater in
magnitude. Th~se Eorces can be translated into improved
resisti~g ~oments for the overall wall structure. Further,
the forward tilting of the rear panel of a module
superposed above a module of a longer partition means
improves the bin-action at the rear of the larger module
below.
Figure 33 shows a further embodiment of the
inventionwhere the partition means 3 is predominantly
trapezoidal, with its upper and lower surface~ arrar
a sawtooth pattern, but the rear panel 10 i~ approximately
at the same level as the front panel 1. Its contact
surfaces 5 and 7 are positioned to engage mutually with
similar modules above and below. Surfaces 4A and 6A may be
located to bear against matching surfaces of similar
modules above and below, or they may be located, so as to
avoid contact with each other when it is desired that the
vertical load be transferred from front panel to front
panel and from rear panel to rear panel. Any module
constructed according to the detail shown is able to
interlock with and above any other module of the same or
larger front-to-rear width. This ability will markedly
decrease the variations in models and significantly reduce
inventory requirements for stock piling and adju3tments to
molds during manufacture compared with ordinary mortise and
- 31 -
~ ~58'38()
tenon interlocked modules in use. Since the resultant
force acting upon a module is always directed toward the
front panel, it is not necessary to have two-wa~
interlocking keys, This condition of a one-direction
lateral loading allows the use of the sawtooth pattern
shown in Figure 33 and also the pattern shown in Figures 1
through 9, etc. The uses of these and similar patterns
results in improved bearing and shear behavior because
significantly more area for bearin~ and shear resistance
can be furnished, when compared with existiny mortise and
tenon, depending lip, or tongue and groove intexlocks for
wall modules.
Figure 34 shows three cellular modules with
generally rectangular partition mean~ 55, one superposed
upon another. It is not material to the invention whether
the modules transmit vertical load~ from panel to panel or
from partition means to partition means. What is provided
is a system for the transference of lateral forces between
modules which allows any size module to be superposed above
a~y similar module regardless of the supporting module's
relative size (smaller or larger) without any change in the
location of the mortises 56. This ability permits a type
of stacking arrangement, similar to that shown in Figs. 36
and 46, where module ~izes increa3e and then decrea~
progressively at each superposed course. The lateral
~5~3~
forces are transferred by keys 57 which engage a single
opposing pair of mortises 56 as shown also in Figure 32, or
by elongated slab-like keys 58 which span from one
partition means to an adjacent one, performing the
additional function of capturing the fill material more
posi~ively. Figure 31 shows a detail of one embodiment of
such a member. Wherever a rsar panel 10 occurs over or
under a mortise in the vertically contiguous module,
bearin~ blocks 59 can be provided in the ca~e of
panel-bearing modules.
Figures 35 throuyh 47 illustrate modules and
assemblies of modules which utilize th0 principles set
forth in the invention. The trapezoidal partition means is
represented inits simplest form, an inclined bearing
surface. In Figure 35 an assembly of modules 61 is shown.
Module 61 comprises a front panel 1, and a non-parallel
rear panel 2 connected by a plurality of trapezoidal
partition elements 63. As set forth in the teachings of
the invention the longitudinal (principal) axes of the
partition elements 63 are inclined at an acute angle from
the plane of t~e front panel such that the upper contact
surface 64 and the lower contact surface 65 ar0 disposed at
an angle ~hich is substantially normal to the line of
action of the resultant force representin~ all loads bein~
transferred from superposed module to supportiny module.
~5~9~
Specifically, the principal axes of the partition elements
extend downward and rearward at an angle of between 20 and
82 degrees from the plane of the front panel 1, such that
the upper edge of the rear panel 2 lies substantially below
a plane extending from the upper edge of the fro~t panel,
and at right angles thereto. As represented in Figure~ 41,
42, ~3 and 44, the superposed module is held in place
during erection of the assembly by a surface 66
perpendicular to the front panel in the æone of the
intersection of the partition elements 63 with the front
panel 1. As soon as a course of modules is loaded with
f ill material inside it~ cellQ and a commensurate ~uantity
of retained material, the resultant loading i5
substantially normal (within the angle of friction between
surfaces 64 and 65) to the resultant load being transferred
from module to module.
Figure 36 i~lustrates an end view in cross-section
of a wall assembl~ o~ modules 61. The assembly uses the
beneficial pattern of module sizes described earlier in
this specification where module size vary, starting at the
base of the wall, from small to larger to smaller as the
courses progress upwardly. This pattern is shown here to
illustrate the facility with which different sizes of
modules 61 fit one above the other in any sequsnce without
special fabrication. This greatly simplifies the number of
- 3~ -
8~3
differ~nt shape variations which must be fabric~ted or
carri~d in in~entory.
Figures 37 and 38 show special closure slabs which
may be incorporated in a wall assembly constructed of
modules similar to module 61. On the top surfac~ of a
module which does not support a larger module, the exposed
top of the cells containing fill material may be, if
desired, cov~red by a closure slab 67. I~ a smaller module
0 i5 superpo ed, the additional width exposed may be covered
by adding one or a plurality of closure .~lab~ 68. Closure
slab 67 is formed to contain a depending portion 67A which
fits between adjacent partition elements and which enga~es
the surface of the rear panel which faces the inside of the
module. Closure slab 68 may be rectangular in cross-
section.
In some cases it may be desirable to close the open
space at the bottom of a module which overhangs its
s~upporting module. Closure slab ~9, shown in Figure 38,
fits between adjacent partition element-~ at the bottom of a
module and accomplishes this task~ A recessed keyway 70 is
provided in rear panel 2A to support the rearmost ed~e 69A
of the slab while the opposite edge 69B is supported on the
top eurface of the lower module's rear panel.
- 35 -
~5~9~(1
Figures 39 and 40 show two possible configurations
of base modules 62, 72 for wall as~emblies using module
61. The base module 62 is simply a module 61 truncated at
the bottom to lie along the subgrade of the wall. Base
module 72 shown in Figure 40 is similar to base module 62
but the exterior bottom surface of the ~ront panel has been
extended substantially forward to move the pivot point,
about which an entire wall assembly tends to rotate, to a
more beneficial location.
Figures 41 and 42 show a module 61 ~ith a vertical
rear panel 10 and with mortise~ 56 provided in the upper
and lower edges of the partition elements 63A. These
mortises are dimensioned to accept a keying block 57 or
slab 58 similar to those illustrated in Fiyures 31, 32 and
34. ~ey 57 is shown in Figure 41 but a slab 58 may be used
with equal f acility. .T~e purpose of the key is to secu~e
the position of the blocks during assembly and until the
lateral force ~rom the retained material is allowed to
act. Figure~ 43 and 44 show a similar type of module but
with an inclined rear panel.
Figure 45 illustrates several keying mechanisms
which may be used to secure a superposed mo~ul~. Joint 73A
is secured by depending keys in the front and rear panels
which mate with keyways in the top of the front panel and
- 36 -
~1~5~98~:)
in the tops of the generally trapesoidal partition means of
the lo~er module. Joint 73B is ~ecured by a wedge-shaped
protrusion and matching recess. Joint 73C i~ ~ecured by
one or a plurality of key locks (may be a shelf-like member
58) which fit in recesses (such as mortises) placed in
contraposition in the contact surfaces of vertically
contiguous modules. Joint 73D and 73E are secured by
standard mortise and tenon keys. In joint 73D the tenons
extend upward while in 73E the tenon extend downward into
their mating mortises~ Joints 73F are planer contact
surfaces which are secured during erection by a reversal in
the direction o~ inclination of the contact surfaces in the
zone of the intersection of th~ partition meanC with the
~ront panel. This reversal of the incline of the surfaces
at the face of the wall (downward toward the front) would
provide the additional benefit o~ decreasing the quantity
of water likely to seep through the joint from the exterior
surface of the wall. Figure 45 is intended only as a
composite drawing of representative means to secure the
module~.
Figures 46 and 47 show an assembly of wall modul~s
71 which are keyed in a manner which provides additional
benefits. Each module 71 has the rearmost portion of its
partition means displaced upwardly to form a pair of
interlocking surfaces when the module is placed in vertical
- 37 -
1~58980
contiguity with a similar module 71. Interlocking surface
74 is on the top of each partition means 77, and
interlocking surface 75 is on the bottom of each partition
means 77 except the partition means of the smallest module,
which is too small to contain surface 75. The interlocking
surfaces 74 for the top edge all occur at the same distance
from the front panel 1 for each size module 71, except the
smallest. Likewise the interlocking surfaces 75 on the
bottom edge all occur at the same distance from the front
panel 1 for each size module 71, except the smallest. The
interlocking surfaces 74 and 75 could be placed at the same
distance from the front panel 1 allowing them to mate
directly, but in the as~embly illustrated in Figures 46 and
47, surface 75 is placed a substantial distance ~orward
(toward front panel 1) of surface 74. This separation of
the mating surfaces allows the placement of a slab 76 which
spans between adjacent partition means, and which produces
substantial benefits to the wall structure. The slabs 76
impart additional overturning resistance to the wall. ~hen
slab~ 76 occur behind a superposed module they direct the
overturning ~orce in a more downward direction which is
beneficial in effectO
When slabs 76 occur within the cells of a wall
assembly they very efficiently enga~e the forces present in
the fillmaterial and transfer these forces to the partition
- 38 -
~ 5 ~3~
means upon which they are supported. Since the slabs 76
are oriented in the same direction as the joints between
partition m2ans, they are subqtantially normal to the
direction of the forces in the fill material and therefore
very effective. Figure 47 shows how top unit 23, shown
also in Figure 17, may be used effectively in combination
with modules 71.
Figures 48 through 50 show a module 88,
substantially the same as module 11 or 71, wherein each
element of the module, front panel 81, rear panel 82, and
partition means 83, is fabricated separately and
subsequently assembled using a plurality of fastening means
which, in the example illustrated, are interengaging
threaded elements. In the method illustrated a female
threaded insert 78 is cast integrally in one of the
module's main elements, and the element with which it is to
be connected is cast with a cylindrical hole to receive the
male threaded fastener 79. The threaded elements 78 and 79
are positioned to align correctly with each other when the
module's main elements are properly positioned with respect
to each other. ~hen desired, pockets 80 can b@ provided in
one or both of the module's elemen~s to allo~ acces~ in
securing the threaded fastening meansO It is desirable to
restrict stresses in fasteners o~ the type illu-~trated to
tensile stress. Therefore, other means must be provided to
1~589~
transfer shear in any direction in which is may pos~ibly
occur. In the example showna mortise and tenon shear
transfer interlock is designed to function in two plane~.
Shear may be transferred laterally in either direction by
the compression of the edse of partition means against the
ribs 84, cast on the inside of the front and rear panels.
Shear, in a direction parallel with the ribs 84, is
~ransferred by a mortise 86 and tenon 87 cast between the
position of the ribs 84.
Some of the advantages of càstiny the module
elements separately are: simpler and more economical mold
re~uirements (most elements may be cast in a horizontal
plane), better adaptability to mas~ production methods,
less waste when one of the elements is damaged during
fabrication, in shipping, or in erection, and simpler and
smaller inventory of useable elements since the elements
can be mutually interchanged. A cosmetically damaged front
panel may be substituted for a rear panel if the connecting
threaded elements and shear transfer keys are kept in
matching locations. A structurally damaged element can be
discarded with relatively little financial loss.
It will usually be economically advantageous to
assemble the segmental module 88 away from the erection
site. In order to be able to handle safely a non-integral
- 40 -
'.` ' '. . . "
.
3~30
module it is advisable to provide a stiffening diaphragm to
prevent lataral warping of the unit such as would occur if
a change were allowed to occur in the angle, measured in a
horizontal plane, betweenthe partltion elements and the
front and rear panels. One method of stiffening i8 shown
in Figures 48 and 49 wherein a slab 89 is placed between
the partition means during assembly of the module. In the
example illustrated, vertical and horizontal shear is
transferred through a tenon 90 cast at the end of ~lab 89.
Tenon 90 fits with minimal clearances into a mortise 91
cas~ in the body of the partition means 83. ~ plurality of
fastening means, threaded connectors are shown, hold ~he
shoulders 92 at the ends of slab 89 firmly ayainst the
sides of parti~ion means 83 and affect a riyid diaphragm
action. An alternative method of stiffening is to attach
gussets at the intersections of the partition means 83 with
front panel 81 and rear panel 82. One gusset in each o~
two diagonally opposite corners would be the minimum
requirement. The gussets should be connected by threaded
connectors and shear transfer keys in a manner similar to
the connection of slab 89.
Modules, whose partition means carr~ the ~rincipal
wall loads and which transfer these loads directly to
partition means upon which they bear, are more readily
constructed of separately cast element~ becau~e the
5~3~38~
stresses required to be transferred at the connecting
joints are minimal and the joint is therefore simpler and
more economical. For this reason embodiments of this
invention which have partition means which bear directly
upon one another are particularly advantageous.
It should be understood, o~ course, that the
specific forms of the invention herein illustrated and
described are intended to be repre en~ative only, as many
modifications thereof may be made without departing from
the clear teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly,
reference should be made to the following appended claims
in determining the full scope of the invention.
- 42 -
,
'~
