Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~7~
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPTICAL NUTATION SENSING
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1 1. Field _ the Invention
The present invention relates to systems for sensing
the motion of a vehicle. Particularly, the present
invention relates to systems and techniques for sensing
satellite nutation.
While the present invention is described herein with
reference to a particular embodiment for a particular
application, it is understood that the invention is not
limited thereto. Those of ordinary skill in the art will
recognize additional embodiments and applications within the
scope thereof.
2. Description of the Related Art
The advan-tages of spin stabilization for satellite
attitude control have been repeatedly demonstrated.
Unfortunately, spin stabilized satellites are inherently
susceptible to nutation. That is, in the absence of
external torques, the angular momentum vector of a spin
stabilized satellite would be fixed in inertial space.
Nutation, a coning or precessiny motlon of the spin axis,
fixed in the body, around the angular momentum vector,
results from the misalignment of the spin axis by a
transverse angular momentum. Transverse angular momentum
may be induced by the firing of control thrusters during
attitude and orbit correction maneuvers; by the motion of
articulated payload elements; by the effects of flexible
Y
1 elements; or by the sloshing of liquids in the spacecraft.
Wnatever the cause, accurate spin stabilized satellite
attitude control requires the damping of nutation. To this
end, nutation sensors are used in conjunction with
mechanical elements located on the spacecraft. The
mechanical elements provide the energy dissipation (or
addition) required to reduce the wobble by removing the
transverse angular momentum vector.
Nutation sensors are typically linear accelerometers
mounted on the rim of the spacecraft. The accelerometer is
often a hinged pendulus mass, mounted to sense the up and
down motion, due to nutation, along an axis parallel to the
spin axis.
Current nutation sensors have limited low frequency
response. As a result, such sensors have difficulty
measuring very slow nutation frequencies as may be
experienced by large structures having low spin rates. For
such applications, it is desirable to provide an accurate
low speed nutation sensor.
A second shortcoming of current nutation sensors is
that they tend to misinterpret the acceleration due to the
firing of the thrusters as nutation. Accordingly, the
output of the sensor is invalid, if uncorrected, during
thruster firings. This is undesirable as information due to
nutation during thruster firing may be used to provide for
greater control and efficiency during such maneuvers. This
in turn would allow for lower fuel costs and less time to
execute a particular maneuver. Thus it is generally
desirable to provide a nutation sensor which is accurate
during thruster firings.
A third shortcominy of many current nutation sensors is
that for large spacecraft having low spin rates, the
accelerometer sensor must be placed far from the spin axis
to develop a sufficiently strong output signal. An example
of such an spacecraft is the Space Station currently under
development by NASA.
7~1S~
1 As the distance from the spin axis increases, however,
the effects of flexibility have a more significant impact on
the sensor output. Thus, under some circumstances, the
flexure of the spacecraft may be interpreted as nutation.
It is generally desirable therefore to provide a nutation
sensing system which provides an output independent of the
flexure modes of the spacecraft.
10 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The shortcomings illustrated by the related art are
addressed by the optical nutation sensing method and
apparatus of the present invention which is functional at
low spin rates and during thruster firings and which is
relatively insensitive to spacecraft flexures. The
advantageous operation of the present invention is afforded
by provision of first and second beams of coherent light
energy in opposite directions into a coil of optic fiber or
other suitable means for restraining the path thereof. The
coil lies in a plane normal to the transverse angular
velocity of the satellite. The beams are combined at the
output ends of the coil in such a way as to create an
interference pattern which varies as the satellite nutates.
The variation in the interference pattern is detected by
photodetector circuitry to provide an output signal
representative of the nutation.
-3a-
Various aspects of the invention are as follows:
An nutation sensor for sensing nutation in a spin
stabilized satellite having a transverse angular
momentum vector comprising:
means for restraining the path of a beam of energy
said means lying in a plane normal to said transverse
angular momentum vector;
means for providing a first beam of coherent energy
in a first direction along said path and a second beam
of coherent energy in a second direction along said
path;
means for combining said first and second beams at
an output end of said path to form a composite beam; and
means for analyzing the composite beam to provide
an output signal representing the nutation of a vehicle
with respect to a frame reference.
An nutation sensor for sensing nutation in a spin -
stabilized satellite having a transverse angular
momentum vector comprising:
a coil of optic fiber disposed in a plane normal to
said transverse angular momentum vector and having first
and second ends for receiving input and for providing
output;
means for providing first and second beams of
coherent light energy;
beamsplitter means for directing said first beam of
light energy into said first end of said coil and for
directing said second beam of light energy into said
second end of said coil;
means for combining said first and second beams at
the output ends of said coil; and
circuit means for analyzing the combined beam to
provide an output signal representing the nutation of
said satellite.
An improved method of sensing nutation including
the steps of:
a) providing a path for restraining energy in a
plane normal to a transverse angular momentum vector;
3L27~
-. -3b-
b) inputting into said path a first beam of energy
along a first direction and a second beam of energy
along a second direction;
c) combining said first and second beams to provide
an interferenca pattern; and
d) analyzing the interference pattern to provide an
output representing nutation.
r
: 35
~2}7~
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRA~INGS
Fig. 1 is partial view of the present invention in its
intended operational environment.
Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment
of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a diagramatic view of an illustrative
implementation of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is an end view of the optic fiber used in the
present invention showing the interference pattern of the
combined beams.
Fig. 5 is an the interference pattern seen by the end
view of the optic fiber of Fig. 4 by the photodetector of
the present invention.
Fig. 6 is representative of the analog output of the
photodetector of the present invention resulting from a
scan of the interference pattern of Fig. 5.
Fig. 7 shows a typical output of the comparator
for a single loop embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 8 is representative of the analog output of
the photodetector of the present invention resulting
from a scan of the interference pattern associated with
the orthogonal loop of the preferred embodiment.
Fig. 9 shows the output of the comparator
associated with the orthogonal loops of the preferred
embodiment of the present invention.
~2t7~ i6~
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
'
1 As discussed more fully below with reference to Figs. l
- 6, the present invention provides a nutation sensing
apparatus and method which effectively senses nutation at
low nutation (or spin) rates, during thruster firings, and
without sensitivity to spacecraft flexures. The invention
includes a coil of optic fiber having two loops into which
two beams of coherent light are transmitted in opposite
directions. Each loop of the coil (which may have multiple
turns) lies in a plane normal to the transverse angular
velocity vector. The beams are combined at the output of
the coil to provide an interference pattern which varies as
the satellite nutates.
Fig. 1 shows a spin stabilized satellite 10 having a
despun portion 12 and a spun portion 14. The satellite is
e~uipped with the optical nutation sensor 20 of the present
invention. Fig. 1 is illustrative of an external mounting
arrangement by which a coil of optical fiber 22 having two
orthogonal loops 24 and 26 is mounted at or near the
periphery of the spinning portion 14 of the satellite 10
external to the beamsplitter/detector 30. The coil 22 may
be substituted with any suitable means for restraining the
path of light. It is also understood that other mounting
arrangements are attainable as is known to those of ordinary
skill in the art. For example, the coil 22 may be mounted
in the package with the beamsplitter/detector 30.
Fig. 2 is a s-tand-alone view of the optical nutation
sensor 20 of the present invention which more clearly shows
the two orthogonal loops 24 and 26 of the fiber optic coil
22. As will be discussed more fully below, the present
invention is fully operational with a single loop. Two
loops are shown in the preferred embodiment of Fig. 2 as a
~70~
1 best mode of practicing the invention for the following
reason. For large spacecraft having low nutation rates, the
output of a single loop could go to zero during a portion of
the cycle~ This could be misinterpreted as "no nutation" hy
the beamsplitter/detector 30. Two orthogonal loops provide
a higher average output signal in that while the path length
interference pattern associated with one loop is low, that
associated with the orthogonal loop would be high. It is to
be understood that the present invention is not limited to
the number of loops used. It is noteworthy, however, that
the present invention achieves the advantages of two fiber
optic coils while using a single coil. That is, since the
coil 22 is wound into two orthogonal loops the advantages of
two coils are attained without any duplication of hardware.
Whether one coil is used or several coils, the coil
will be sensitive to nutation to the extent that a loop lies
in a plane substantially normal to the transverse angular
velocity vector of the satellite. As the spin rate is
normally much greater than the rate of nutation, the loop
(spinning at the satellite spin rate) will eventually be
normal to the transverse angular velocity vector. At that
point, it will be most sensitive to nutation.
Fig. 3 provides an illustrative implementation of an
optical nutation sensor 20 utilizing the teachings of the
present invention. The sensor 20 includes the coil 22 with
first and second orthogonal loops 2~ and 26 respectively.
The ends of the coil 32 and 34 are fixed within the
beamsplitter/detector 30 in optical alignment with a
beamsplitter 36. The beamsplitter 36 is an off-the-shelf
beamsplitter as is known in the art. To minimize weight
requirements, the beamsplitter 36 may be an optical thin
film coating on a thin plate of optical grade glass or
silica. A low power laser 38 is aligned with the
beamsplitter 36 so that its output beam of coherent light
energy is split into first and second beams having first and
second polarization states respectively. Thus, light of a
1 Eirst polarization state is substantially reflected by the
beamsplitter 36, while that of second polarization state is
substantially transmitted~ The first and second beams are
input to the firsk and second ends 32 and 34 respectively of
the coil 22.
- The beamsplitter 36 also provides means for recombining
the first and second beams into a single output beam. That
is, once again, the light of the first polarization state is
substantially reflected by the beamsplitter 36, while that
of second polarization state is substantially transmitted.
The output beam is input to an off-the-shelf photodetector
40. The photodetector 40 provides an analog output to an
optional signal conditioning circuit including an amplifier
42, a low pass filter 44, comparator 46, analog to digital
converter 48, microprocessor 50 and clock 52. The amplifier
42 boosts the level of the photodetector output signal to
bring it within the input dynamic range of the low pass
filter 44. The low pass filter 44 serves to remove noise
from the signal prior to input to the comparator 46. The
comparator 46 sets the operating point of the detector as
discussed below. The output of the comparator 46 is
digitized by an analog to digital converter 48 and input to
a microprocessor 50. The microprocessor uses input from a
clock 52 to compute the rate of nutation. This is done
using a Kalman filter or estimation technique as is known
in the art. The output of the microprocessor 50 is input to
the satellite attitude and control electronics unit 54. The
attitude and control electronics unit 54 provides control
signals to an attitude control system 56 which typlcally
includes mechanical nutation damping apparatus. Through
mechanical coupling, the attitude control system 56 effects
the spacecraft dynamics 58 to reduce the sensed nutation.
In operation, the laser 38 provides an input beam of
coherent light to the beamsplitter 36. The beamsplitter 36
reflects light of one polarization to one end 32 of the coil
22 and transmits light of a second polarization to a second
5~i~
1 end 34 of the coil 22. Thus two beams of coherent light are
input to the coil 22 in OppQsite directions. The two beams
travel through the coil 22, emerge from the ends 32 and 34
of the coil 22, are recombined by the beamsplitter 36 into a
single beam which irradiates the photodetector 40.
In Fig. 1, the spin axis of the satellite 10 and the
system angular momentum vector are aligned and lie along the
z axis. This represents an absence of nutation during which
the two beams combine to create an initial interference
pattern as illustrated in Fig. 4. The photodetector 40 will
see a slice of the radial interference pattern of Fig. 4
which would appear as shown in Fig. 5. If the photodetector
40 had a single photodetective diode and it scanned the
linear interference pattern of Fig. 5, its output would
approximate that shown in Fig. 6. If, instead of scanning,
the photodetective diode were held in a fixed position, as
in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, its
output would be a voltage level (or current level) such as
that at the operating point A of Fig. 6. The output of the
comparator 46 (essentially a differential amplifier with
negative feedback) would be zero indicating no nutation.
Assuming that a transverse angular momentum is applied
to the satellite 10 of Fig. 1 and that it nutates such that
its spin axis (longitudlnal axis) is misaligned with the
system angular momentum vector which remains fixed in
inertial space, the satellite may have an instantaneous
nutation position as shown in phantom at point B. At the
moment the satellite is at point B, the loop 26 lies in a
plane parallel to the instantaneous plane of nutation (-the
xz plane). While it is understood that the satellite will
undergo a coning motion, the loop will be sensitive to that
component of the coning nutation which lies in the plane
- parallel to the loop 26.
Thus, as the satellite 10 nutates toward the -x,z plane
the path length of one beam traveling through the coil 22
will be lengthen while that of the other beam will be
~ i6~
shortened. The result is a change in the interference
pattern of Figs. 4 and 5. It is clear that the output of
the photodetec-tor 40 will move from point A to point B and
from point B to point C as the satellite 10 continues to
nutate.
As such, point A now represents a point of
ambiguity. That is, an output at point A could signal
no nutation or either of two crossings of the z,y plane.
However, the illustrative waveform of Fig. 8 showing a
single loop detector output for the loop 24, indicates
that the orthogonal loop 24 will complement loop 26 and
provide a high output when the satellite 10 crosses the
z,y plane. Thus, while Fig. 7 shows the typical
sinusoidal output of the comparator 46 for the single
loop case, Fig. 9 shows the output 60 of the combined
tsummed) interference patterns associated with the
loops 24 and 26. The amplitude of waveform 60 is
indicative of the amount of nutation, the periodicity
indicates the rate, and the phase of the waveform
indicates the direction of nutation.
Thus the waveform 60 is digitized by the A/D converter
48 and used by the microprocessor 50 with input from the
clock 52 (in the illustrative implementation of Fig. 3) to
provide signals to the attitude control electronics system
54 indicative of the amplitude, rate and direction of
nutation. The attitude control electronics system 54
provides appropriate corrective signals to the
electromechanical attitude control system 56 which corrects
the spacecraft mechanics in a manner known to those skilled
in the art.
6~
1 The principle of operation of the present invention is
the well known Sagnac Effect as described in the literature
of which the following is a sample:
1. "Sagnac Effect", E. J. Post, REVIEWS OF MODERN
PHYSICS, Vol. 39, pp. 475-494 (1967);
2. "Fiber Optic Ring Interferometer", V. Vali and R~ W.
Shorthill, APPLIED OPTICS, Vol 15, No. 5, pp. 1099-1100
(1976);
3. "Fiber Optics for Communications and Control", W. C.
Goss, PROC. SOC. PHOTO-OPT. INSTRUM. ENG., Vol. 224, pp. 38-
45 (1980);
4. "An Optical Rotation Sensor Based on the Sagnac
Effect Using A Fibre Optics Ring Interferometer", G.
Schiffner, Meeting on Optical Communications - Berlin
Germany (1980);
5. "Fiber-Optic Rotation Sensor: Toward and Integrated
Device; A Review", H. J. Arditty, M. Papuchon, and C. Puech;
C~EO '81. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (paper in
summary form only), (1981);
6. Fiber-Op-tic Rotation Sensors and Related
Technoloqies, S. Ezekkiel and H. ~. Arditty, Proceeding of
the First International Conference MIT, Cambridge, MA,
November 9-11 (1981).
Thus, the present invention has been described with
reference to an illustrative implementation and a particular
application. Those of ordinary skill in the art having
ll
access to the teachings of the present invention will
recognize additional implementations within the scope
thereof. For example, it is not necessary that light be
used to practice the present invention. Any form of energy
which will provide an interference pattern will suffice. As
mentioned above, the invention is not limited to the use of
an optic fiber. Any suitable means for restraining light
may be used. The invention is similarly not limited to the
number of coils or loops shown herein. Nor is the invention
limited to a particular packaging or mountiny arrangement.
The method used to detect the beams of light and the form in
which the output signals are presented to the satellite
control system is also not critical to the invention.
It is intended by the appended Claims to cover any and
all such alternative implementations and embodiments.
