Language selection

Search

Patent 1271893 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1271893
(21) Application Number: 510702
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR IMPARTING ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY FROM ACRYLICS
(54) French Title: METHODE POUR CONFERER UNE ACTIVITE ANTIMICROBIENNE A UNE COMPOSITION ACRYLIQUE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 402/345
  • 402/364
  • 402/407
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08F 220/44 (2006.01)
  • A01N 25/10 (2006.01)
  • A61L 9/01 (2006.01)
  • A61L 15/46 (2006.01)
  • A61L 17/00 (2006.01)
  • A61L 27/54 (2006.01)
  • A61L 29/00 (2006.01)
  • A61L 29/04 (2006.01)
  • A61L 29/16 (2006.01)
  • D01F 6/38 (2006.01)
  • D06M 15/29 (2006.01)
  • D06M 15/356 (2006.01)
  • D06M 16/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PARDINI, STEVEN P. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • PARDINI, STEVEN P. (Not Available)
  • E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: MCCALLUM, BROOKS & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1990-07-17
(22) Filed Date: 1986-06-03
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
740,896 United States of America 1985-06-03

Abstracts

English Abstract



METHOD FOR IMPARTING
ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY FROM ACRYLICS

ABSTRACT

A method for imparting non-fugitive antimicrobial
activity to an article of manufacture is disclosed
which comprises forming the articles of manufacture
from a polymeric acrylonitrile composition which
includes up to 10% of a protonated amine. The
antimicrobial activity is inherent in the
acrylonitrile composition.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS

1. A method for imparting non-fugitive
antimicrobial activity, effective in reducing viable
microorganisms, exhibiting a shake flask percent
reduction of Klebsiella of 70 to 100% to an article
of manufacture comprising the steps of forming said
article of manufacture from a polymeric acrylonitrile
composition of:
a. at least 85% by weight acrylonitrile,
b. up to about 13% by weight of a neutral
ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and
c. from about 0.1 to 10% by weight of a
protonated amine containing compound.
where said antimicrobial activity is inherent in the
acrylonitrile composition.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the protonated
amine containing compound is a protonated amine
containing comonomer.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the protonated
amine containing compound is a protonated amine
containing polymer end group.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the protonated
amine containing comonomer is a acrylic monomer
selected from the group consisting of
Dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate (DMAM),
Diethylaminoethylmethacrylate (DEAM),
Tertiarybutylaminoethylmethacrylate (TBAM),
Dimethylaminoneopentyl acrylate (DMANPA),
2-methyl-5-vinyl pyridine (MVP), and
Dimethylaminopropylmethacryloamide (DMAPMA).
5. The method of claim 3 wherein the protonated
amine containing polymer end group is an amidino
group, connected to the polymer backbone


16
selected from the group consisting of Thiourea and
2-amidinopropane hydrochloride.
6. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are gram-positive or gram-negative
bacteria.
7. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are fungi.
8. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are yeasts.
9. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are spore-forming bacteria.
10. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are mold.
11. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are staphylococcus.
12. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are pseudomonas.
13. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are streptococcus.
14. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
microorganisms are bacillus.
15. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
article is a filter that would come in contact with
the microorganisms.
16. the method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
article is a medical device that would come in
contact with biological fluids.
17. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
article is a container for packaging food.
18. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the shake
flask percentage reduction of Klebsiella is
99.9-100%.
19. The method of claim 2 or 3 wherein the
acrylonitrile composition is a fiber, having a finish
containing cationic antistat applied thereto

16

17
20. A method of reducing viable microorganisms
which comprises contacting a surface containing such
microorganisms with an article of manufacture formed
from a polymeric acrylonitrile composition of:
a. at least 85% by weight acrylonitrile
b. up to about 13% by weight of a neutral
ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and
c. from about 0.1 to 10% by weight of a
protonated amine containing compound.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the article
of manufacture is a tube.
22. The method of claim 20 wherein the article
of manufacture is a fabric.
23. The method of claim 20 wherein the article
of manufacture is a suture.
24. An article of manufacture exhibiting
non-fugitive antimicrobial activity, said article
being at least partially formed from a polymeric
acrylonitrile composition of:
a. at least 85% by weight acrylonitrile
b. up to about 13% by weight of a neutral
ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and
c. from about 0.1 to 10% by weight of a
protonated amine containing compound.

17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~` ` 1271893




TITLE
Method for Imparting
Antimicrobial Activitv from Acrvlic~
DESCRIPTION
5Technical Field
Thi6 application relate6 to a method for
i~partinq non-fugitive antimicrobial activity to an
article of manufacture by forminq the article from
acrylic polymer fiber6 or fabric6.
10Back~round
It i6 known that antimicrobial chemical
agents can be ~pun into or topically applied to
gynthetic fibers. However, topical treatment6 are
readily sub3ected to surface abrasion and eventually
15 removed from the fiber. Additives are fugitive and
after a limited number of wash and wear cycle~ the
chemical agent can be depleted and the antimicrobial
protection lost. A key uncertainty in the6e
approaches i6 the additive level. The amount of
20 additive needed to provide desired end u6e propertie6
will depend upon the lifetime of the final pcoduct,
the degree of blending with other fiber6, the
frequency of wa6h-and-wear cycle6 and the degree of
abra6ion during normal u6age. The combination of
25 these factors could require exces6ive additive level6
which become prohibitive both economically and
technically.
The main problem with the 6pun in approach i6
the toxicity of the additive. In certain end u6e6
30 6uch a6 children'6 gar~ents, medical product6 and
intimate apparel, fugitive additive6 could have
A0-2495 potentially toxic effect6. Al60, many 6ynthetic fiber
proce66e6 require elevated temperature6 for extended
period6 of time or make use of exotic 601vent6 under
35 heat and pre66ure which could lead to unwanted 6ide

1271893
, .



reaction~ of the additive6 that produce toxic
by-product6 (e.g., dioxin6), corro~ive 6pecie6 (e.g.,
chloride6) and/or eliminate the additive~6
antimicrobial activity. Thi6 would re6ult in
5 production. handling and di6po6al problem6 and would
require additional technologie6 tO 6afely produce the
fiber.
Surface-bonded, alkoxy6ilane
quaternary-ammonium chloride6 provide antimicrobial
10 fiber protection. The bioactive quaternary-ammonium
alkoxy6ilane i8 applied onto the fiber or final
product rom a methanol finish 601ution, and bonded to
the surface by hydroly6i6 and conden6ation of the
lkoxy~ilane with hydroxyl group6 of the fiber. But
15 in the case of acrylic, polyester, nylon and other
fiber6 vhich ate aade o polymer6 that do not contain
slgnificant amount6 of hydroxyl group6, the
alkoxylsilane6 cannot be bonded to the fiber 6urface
by the hydrolysi6 and sub6equent conden6ation
20 reactioQ6. Thu6 the 6iloxane vould be merely a
topical treatment to these fiber6. Several problem6
have been encountered in thi6 approach. The
surface-applied finish has a fugitive chloride counter
ion ~hich can easily exchange vith organic phosphate6
25 and ~ulfonates thus when the product is laundered the
antimicrobial efficacy of the surface applied fini6h
can be greatly reduced. Another significant problem
is aethanol release during the alkoxysilane bonding
process, whicb can pose toxicity and potential
30 flaamability concerns. Pinally, methoxy6ilyl
compounds are incompatible ~ith mo6t aqueou6,
emulsion-based, textile fini6he6, which lead6 to
undesirable, finish-application and durability
? problem


93




Summary of the Invention
It has now been discovered that certain types of
acrylic polymers, fibers and fabrics have
non-fugitive antimicrobial properties. In the
present invention it was discovered that non-fugitive
antimicrobial activity is imparted to acrylic
polymers, fibers or fabrics made thereof, by
copolymerization of an acrylic protonated amine
comonomer and/or by use of protonated amine end
groups.
Accordingly, the invention provides a method for
imparting non-fugitive antimicrobial activity,
effective in reducing viable microorganisms,
exhibiting a shake flask percent reduction of
Klebsiella of 70 to 100% to an article of manufacture
comprising the steps of forming said article of
manufacture from a polymeric acrylonitrile
composition of:
a. at least 85% by weight acrylonitrile,
b. up to about 13% by weight of a neutral
ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and
c. from about 0.1 to 10% by weight of a
protonated amine containing compound.
where said antimicrobial activity is inherent in the
acrylonitrile composition.
The protonated amine sites are part of the
acrylic polymer chain and thus their durability in
the final product is independent of end use
properties, such as lifetime of the final product,
wash-and-wear cycle frequency and degree of abrasion
during normal usage. Furthermore, diffusible, toxic
additives which may pose serious concern in certain


.,

~2~1893
3a

end uses are not present. Since the antimicrobial
agent is part of the polymer itself, toxic byproducts
from spinning and fiber processing conditions do not
occur.
In addition, the protonated amines are
distributed throughout the polymer and thus are
present in all parts of the fiber and its surface.
The equilibrium distribution of protonated amines is
an inherent part of the fiber. The finding of
antimicrobial activity of the fiber itself is
surprising in light of the fact, as set out in U.S.
Patent 3,197,430, that fibers produced from
acrylonitrile polymers were thought not to have the
inherent ability to inhibit the growth oE bacteria.
The fiber of this invention is quite stable
especially relative to the surface bound alkoxysilane
qyaternary amines which are readily deactivated by
soap solutions.
An essential prerequisite to antimicrobial action
is effective contact between the chemical agent and
the microorganism. Upon effective contact, the




A

.. ... . . . . . . . . .. . ..

12~893



chemical agent interact6 with some critical component
of the microbial 6tructuee and/or metaboli6m.
Specific mode6 of action of antimicrobial compounds
are dif~icult to determine and are complicated by
concentration, pH, temperature, 601vent, electrolyte
and pha6e 6eparation effect6.
The term antimicrobial i6 u6ed to de~cribe
reduction in the number of viable pathanogenic or
nui6ance cau6ing (e.g., odor cau6ing, biological oe
phy6ical degradation cau6ing) microorgani6m6. The
tera non-fugitive is u6ed to describe the nature of
the acrylic antimicrobial component, whicb, barring
exposure of the acrylic poly~er itself to 6e~ere
conditions of hydrolysis oe decompo6ition, cannot be
eli~inated from tbe iber.
These non-fugitive anti~icrobial propertie6
of this invention are ideal for reduction of di6ea6e
causing ~iceoorganism6, protection again6t biological
degradatlon, and are useful for odor reduction and
~ildew resistance, etc.
Acrylonitrile polymer6, fiber6 and fabric6
with anti~icrobial propertie6 would be u6eful a6
anti~icrobial air and water filters for isolation
purposes, ~olutioQ tabilizer6 and ~embrane6 for
Z5 purification and concentration purpo6e6, ~edical
devices for di-ease prevontion in bandages, wound
dressings, wipes, tampon6, ponge6, gown6, drainage
tubes, catheters, ~uture6, etc., hygiene product6 for
odor r-duction in diaper6, sanitary napkin6, 60ck6,
etc., industrial product6 for ~ildew re6i6tant paint6,
anti~icrobial packaging ~aterial6 for increa6ed fruit
and vegetable shelf life and for ~any other u6e6 wbere
microorganism6 are encountered.
Additive6 ~ay also be u6ed with thi6
invention to impar~ ddltion-l antimlorobi~l or other


~ 4

1 ~1893

hyqienic. biological. or medical protection to acrylic
polymer~. fiber6 or fabric~ in end u6e6 where
additional reduction in the number of viable
pathanogenic or nui6ance cau6ing microorgani6m6 or
elimination or deactivation of metabolic byproduct6 i6
de6ired.
Pol~mer Preparation Method:
One liter of demineralized water wa~ added to
a clean two liter water jacketed aluminum ve66el. The
water was blanketed with nitrogen ga6 and agitated
between 50 and 150 revolution6 per ~inute. ~he
reaction temperature wa6 set between 50C and 600C
with heated water through the reaction ves6el jacket.
Zndividual monomer6 were weighed out in the de6ired
15 amOUntB 80 the sum total of their weight6 wa6 400
gram6. If u6ed. the amine monomer wa6 added to the
reaction ve~6el fir6t, and then the pH wa6 adju6ted
with lOt ~ulfuric acid to 3.0 ~ O.S. The remaining
monomer~ were carefully added to the reaction ve66el.
The p~ was checked again and adjusted if nece6sary.
The temperature wa6 checked and allowed to come back
into limit6 beore addition of the initiating agent6.
In the meantime, one of the following polymerization
initiator 601utions wa6 prepared: ¦
(la) 8 grams of 77 ppm ferrou6 ammonium
sulfate solution
20 gram6 of 11.5~ hydrogen peroxide
~olution
30 gra~s of 7~ l-thioglycerol 601ution
(lb) S grams of 77 pp~ ferrou6 ammonium
~ulfate solution
20 gra~ of 11.5% hydrogen peroxide
solution
30 gram6 of 7~ thiourea solution
(2) 5 gram6 of 77 ppm ferrou6 a~moniu~
sulfate 601ution
30 gram6 of 20~ 60dium bi6ulfite 601ution
ZO gra~6 of 4.5% pota66ium per6ulfate
601ution
35 (3) 5 gram6 of 2.2'-azobi6
(Z-amidinopropane) hydrochloride
4s gram6 of de~ineralized water
s

12~ 3



The initiator solution wa~ then added to the
rea~tion ve~6el, and the in6uing reaction wa~ watched
clo6ely. The agi~ator 6peed wa6 610wly increa6ed a6
the 61urry began to thicken. Room temperature
demineralized water wa6 610wly added a6 the
temperature began to ri6e. The reaction wa6 run from
the point of initiation for 60 minute6. If the 61urry
became too thick or the reaction temperature went too
high, a small amount of 61urry wa6 drawn out and more
room temperature demineralized water wa6 610wly added.
At the end of the reaction time one of the
following polymer quench solution6 wa6 added to the
reaction vessel:
(1) 10 grams of 8%
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 601ution
15 gra~s of 20t sodium bi6ulfite 601ution
(2) 10 grams of 8%
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid 601ution
t3) Cold water to reduce reaction
temperature below 45-C.
After the appropriate quench 601ution wa6
added, the polymer 61urry wa6 stirred for lS minute6.
The slurry was drawn out of the reaction ves6el by
vacuum aspiration and filtered on a Buckner funnel.
The polymer was then removed from the filter funnel,
eeslurried in one liter of 80-C demineralized water,
~tirred for 10 ~inute6, and flltered. The re61urry
filtratlon ~tep was repeated twice. The polymer wa6
then ~lurried in reagent grade acetone, 6tirred 10
minutes, and filtered on a Buckner funnel. The wa6hed
polymer wa6 then wrapped in chee6e cloth, placed in a
stainle6s steel pan and dried 16 to Z4 hour6 in an air
draft oven at 65-C.

i2'71893
-




Fiber Pre~aration
Fiber6 were prepared by ~tandard acrylic dry
6pinning technique6. The polymer wa~ di~solved in
dimethylformamide up to a 23 to 33% ~olid~ level,
heated to between 9o and 110C, filtered, then heated
to 110 to 150C and extruded through a 1400 hole
6pinneret at a ~pinning 6peed o~ 270 ypm. Nitrogen
a6piration ga6 carried the solvent away a6 the
individual filaments were formed. The fiber6
collected at the exit of the 6pinning cell had an
as-spun denier per filament of 9Ø Re6idual solvent
was extracted from the spun fiber in 90 to 100C water
as the fiber wa6 drawn either 4.5x or 6.0x to yield
drawn denier per filaments of 2.0 and 1.5
re8pectively. Standard textile fiber fini6h wa6
applied using a roll applicator to reduce interfiber
friction and provide lubricity during 6ub6equent
textile processing. ~he finish applied contained a
cationic aneistat rather than an anionic anti6tat,
Bince the anionic anti6tat would react with the
protonated amine. The drawn fiber wa6 then
mechanically crimped and collected at the exit end of
a draw-extration machine. The mechanically crimped
yarn wa6 then dried in a dryer between 90 and 120C to
z5 yield final denier per filament of 3.0 and 2.2
respectively,
Antimicrobial Activitv Measurement Procedure6:
The non-fugitive antimicrobial activity of
polymers, fibers and fabric6 were evaluated by the
Shake Fla8k Te8t Procedure and the Parallel Streak
Method.
A. Shake Flask Te6t - In the Shake Fla6k
Te6t procedure, 70 ml of sterile pH 7.2 pota66ium
hydrogen phosphate buffer solution wa6 added to
sterile 250 ml Erlenmeyer fla6k6. Each fla6k wa6 then

; ~2'7~89~
-


inoculated with 5 ml of a bacterial inoculum to yield
colony forming unit6/ml 601ution~. The fla6k~
were 6haken well and time zero count6 were made by
removing 1 ml aliquot6 from each fla6k and making l:lo
and 1:100 dilution6 in pho~phate buffer. Duplicate
poue plates of the l:lOo dilution in tryptone gluco6e
extract agar were prepared. incubated at 37C for 18
to 24 hour6 and counted. One gram of test polymer or
fiber wa6 a~eptically added to each fla6k. One extra
flask wa6 prepared containing the bacterial inoculu~
but no test solution to insure that the bacterial
cultuee was viable in the test so1ution. The flask6
were placed on a wri~t action shaker and shaken for
one to two hours. The one to two hour contact time
counts were ~ade by removing 1 d aliquots from each
flask and ~aking 1:10 and 1:100 dilution6 in phosphate
buffer. Duplicate pour plates of both dilution6 were
prepared in tryptone gluco6e extract agar, incubated
at 37-C for 18 to 24 hours and the dilution6
containing 30 to 300 count6 were counted. The zero
time counts and the one hour contact time count6 were
then corrected for their re6pective dilution factor6,
and 100 times the difference between the initial and
final counts dLvided by the initial counts wa6 the
test item percent reduction. The 6hake flask procedure
provided result~ on the relative bioactivitie6 of
various poly~ers, fibers and fabric6 again6t a wide
range of microorganis~s. Results are given in Table6
lI-VI aod V~II. The Shake Plask Te~t procedure i6
outlined in Malek, J.R. and Speier, J.L., The Journal
of Coated Fabric~. Vol. 12, July, 1982, pp. 38-45.
B. Parallel Strea~ Method - To confirm the
non-fugitivity of the antimicrobial component, the
Parallel Streak Hethod wa6 employed. Sterilized agar
qrovth medium vas prepared and 15 ml poured into each

~`
- :a2~71893

loo mm dia~eter flat bot.om petri di~h. The agar wa~
then allowed to firmly gel. A 1 ml sample of the
de6ired test organi~m broth culture was tran~ferred
into 9 ml of ~terile demineralized water and mixed by
6tireing with a 4 mm inoculating loop. One loopful of
the diluted inoculum wa~ tran6ferred to a 6terile agar
plate by making five 7.5 cm long parallel 6trea~6 1 cm
apart in the center of the plate without refiling the
loope, taking care not to break the agar surface. An
oblong ~haped test 6pecimen wa6 gently pres6ed
tran~ver~ely across the five $Doculation 6treak6 to
insure intimate contact with the agar surface. The
sample wa~ then incubated for 18 to 24 hour6 at 37C.
The incubated plate6 were examined for interruption of
growth along the ~treak6 of inoculum underneath the
~ample and for a clear zone beyond thé ~ample edge.
The average width of the zone of inhibition around the
te6t specimen was estimated with a ruler graduated in
millimeter~. Re6ults are given in Table VtI. Thi~
~ethod i6 de6ccibed in more detail in AATCC Te~t
Method 147-1977.
TABLE I
AMINE CONTAINING ACRYLIC MONOMERS
AND INITIATING AGENTS
25 ~Q~89~ M.W.
q/mole
Di~ethylaminoethylmethacrylate (DMAM) 157
Diethylaminoethylmethacrylate (DEAM) 185
Tertiarybutylaminoethylmethacrylate (TBAM) 185
Dimethylaminoneopentylacrylate (DMANPA) 174
2-methyl-5-vinyl pyridine (MVP) 119
Dimethylaminopropylmethacryloamide (DMAPMA) 170

End GrOUD6
Thiourea 76
2-amidinopropane hydrochloride 121

f j--- 127~893


ExamPle 1
Polymer sample~ were prepared according to
the method described above. Acrylonitrile (AN) and
S methylacrylate (MA) monomer6 were copolymerized with
various protonated am~ne containing ~onomer6. These
polymers were then challenged again6t Klebsiella
pneumoniae in the Shake Plas~ ~est. Result6 from
these experiments are given in Table II. Thi6 example
~hows that the copolymerization of protonated amine
containing ~onomers in acryl~c polymerg ~part6
anti~icroblal activity.

TABLE II

Polyoer- Percent Monomer Sha~e Flas~
~zat~on by Weight % Reduction Quench
Item Initiator AN MA Amine tNa~e) ~Klebsiella) SYstem
1 2 94 6 0 -- 40.0 2
2 2 90 6 4 (DMAM) 96.9 2
3 2 90 6 4 (DEAM) 99.7 2
4 2 90 6 4 (TBAM) 99.9 2
2 90 6 4 (DMANPA) 95.0 2
6 2 90 6 4 (MVP) 74.3 2
7 2 90 6 4 (DMAPMA) 96.Z 2

Exa~Dle 2
To determine the efects of protonated amine
containing end groups on ~oly~er bloactivity, a range
f poly~ecization initiators were tested. Polymer
~a~ples were prepared according to the method
described and challenged against Klebsiella pneumoniae
in the Sha~e Plas~ Test. ~esults from these
experiments. given in Table III. show that protonated
amine containing end groups impart bioactivity to
acrylic polymers.



12~18g3


TABLE III
Polymer- Percent
ization Monomer Shake Flask
Initi- by Weight % Reduction Quench End~
Item ator _ AN MA (Kleb6iella) Mixture GrouD
8 la 94 6 36.4 1 thioglycerol
9 lb 94 6 96.1 1 thiourea
2 94 6 40.0 2 6ulfonate
lo 11 3 94 6 99.8 3 2-amidino-
propane
Thiourea and 2-amidino-propane end qroup6 contain protonated
amines. Thioglycerol and 6ulfonate end group6 do not
contain protonated amine6.

ExamDle 3
To determine the minimum copolymerized
protonated amine level required to produce a bioactive
polymer, a ~eries of polymer6 were prepared according
to the method de~cribed above and then challenged
again~t Kleb6iella pneumoniae in the Shake Flask
~e6t. Re6ult6 from the6e experiment6 are ¢iven in
Table IV.

TABLE IV
Polymer- Percent
ization Monomer Shake Fla6k
Initi- by Weight % Reduction Quench
Item ator AN MA DEAM (~leb6iella) Mixture
12 la 94 6 0 36.4
30 13 la 93.8 6 O.Z 77.4
14 la 93.5 6 0.5 83.1
la 93 6 1 66.2
16 la 92 6 2 98.7
17 la 90 6 4 95.3



11

1271893

12
Exam~le6 4-7
Example6 4, S. 6. 7 include Item6 18 and 19.
A6 can be 6een from Table V. Item 1~ doe6 not includ~
any protonated amine. wherea6 Item 19 contain~ a
protonated amine.
ExamDle 4
Polymers were prepared in a continuou~
overflow reaction and then spun into fiber6 according
to the method described above. The bioactivity of the
polymer and the fiber were determined in the Shake
Flask ~est against Kleb~iella pneumoniae. Result6 of
these experiments are given in Tablè Y. ~he6e re6ult~
demon~trate that bioactive polymer propertie6 are
retained ~hen transformed into fiber.

TABLE V
Polymer- Percent Shake Flask
ization Monomer % Reduction
Initi- by Weight (Klebsiella) Quench
Item ator AN MA DEAM Pol~mer Fiber Mixture
2018 2 94 6 0 2.3 3.4 2
19 la 90.7 6 3.3 98.8 99.9

ExamPle 5
Fiber samples were prepared according to the
method described above and were challenged against a
~ide range of ~icroorqani~ms in the Shake Flask Test.
Results of these experiments are given in Table vr.
These results demonstrate that fiber6 made from
protonated amine containing acrylic polymer6 have a
high level of bioactivity against a wide range of
microorganisms.




12

, 127~8g3
13
TABLE VI
Shake ~la~k
s Reduction
Microorqani6m Item 1~ Item_ls
A. niger (mold)19.7 62.5
S. cecevi6iae (yea6t) 33.1 74.4
Clado6porium 6p. (mildew) 20.1 60.7
Bacterial lnoculum
K. pneumoniae 14.5 99.9
(Kleb6iella)
E. coli B.2 99.9
E. agglomeran6 32.0 99.9
S. aureu~ 23.1 99.9
S. epidermidi6 25.1 99.9
B. 6ubtilis 49.4 B5.3
P. aerugino~a 54.0 99.0

ExamDle 6
Fiber 6amples were prepared according to the
method described above and challenged again6t
Kleb6iella pneumoniae in the Parallel Strea~ Method,
to confirm the nonfugitivity of amine containing
acrylic fiber~. Re6ults from the6e experiment6 are
given in Table VII.

TABLE VII
PARALLEL STREAK METHOD
Growth Inhibition (Kleb6iella)
ItemBelow SamPle Zone Around SamDle
(mm)
18 None 0
19 Complete o

~ ~ ~ 2~.893
14
ExamDle 7
Fiber samples prepared by the ~ethod
de6cribed above were fabrlcated into nonwoven product6
and challenged against ~leb6iella in the Shake Flask
Test. Re~ults from these experiments are given in
Table vrIr. These results demonstrate that the high
level non-fugitive bioactivity found in protonated
amine containing acryllc fiber6 iB maintained ~n
nonwoven fabrics.
TABLE VI I I
r. ~hake Flas~
,x % aeduction
(~lebsiella)
Pabric Item 18 Item 19
15 HydraulicallY Needled 3~.5 99.9
Shermally ~ondea 44.3 99.9
(25% Polyester binder)

~' 20





Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1271893 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1990-07-17
(22) Filed 1986-06-03
(45) Issued 1990-07-17
Deemed Expired 1993-01-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1986-06-03
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1986-09-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
PARDINI, STEVEN P.
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-10-07 15 448
Drawings 1993-10-07 1 6
Claims 1993-10-07 3 95
Abstract 1993-10-07 1 13
Cover Page 1993-10-07 1 15