Language selection

Search

Patent 1278071 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1278071
(21) Application Number: 528216
(54) English Title: LUMBER MOISTURE CONTENT SORTER
(54) French Title: MACHINE DE TRI DU BOIS D'OEUVRE EN FONCTION DE L'HYGROMETRIE DU BOIS
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 341/5
  • 341/55
  • 341/61
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B07C 5/28 (2006.01)
  • B07C 5/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • REDEKOP, ALFRED WILLIAM JOHN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • COE NEWNES/MCGEHEE INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: EDWARDS, ANTONY C.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1990-12-18
(22) Filed Date: 1987-01-27
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


LUMBER MOISTURE CONTENT SORTER
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A method and apparatus determining the moisture
content of the piece of wood by sensing the volume of the
piece of wood, measuring its weight and based on its
species determining the percent moisture. Preferably, the
pieces of wood will then be sorted on the basis of mois-
ture content and dried using drying cycles keyed to
moisture content.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims

1. A method of determining the moisture content of a piece of wood
comprising sensing at least one dimension of said piece of wood and automatically
determining the volume of said piece of wood in a computer, sensing the weight of said
piece of wood and feeding the sensed weight to said computer, calculating the mass
density of said piece of wood in said computer, and comparing in said computer the
calculated mass density of said piece of wood with a previously determined mass density
calculated based on wet volume an oven dry weight of the wood for the species to which
said piece of wood belongs pre-programmed in said computer thereby to determine the
moisture in said piece of wood.

2. A method of segregating wood pieces into groups of different moisture
contents comprising, sensing at least the major dimension of each said wood piece to
provide sufficient data to automatically determine the volume of each piece in acomputer to which a signal indicating the sensed dimension is transmitted, sensing the
weight of each wood piece and feeding the sensed weight to said computer, calculating
the mass density of each wood piece in said computer and controlling the segregation
of said wood pieces into different groups depending on sail calculated mass densities
with said computer

3. Method as defined in claim 2 further comprising segregating said wood
to groups, the first group having a mass density higher than a preset value and the
second group having a mass density less than said preset value and wherein said preset
volume of mass density corresponds with a moisture content of between about 80% and
110%.

4. Method as defined in claim 2 further comprising segregating said wood
to groups the first group having a mass density higher than a preset value and the
second group having a mass density less than said preset value and wherein said preset
volume of mass density corresponds with a moisture content of between about 90% and
100%.

5. An apparatus for separating wood pieces into groups of different moisture
contents comprising means for sensing at least the maximum dimension of each of said



wood pieces to permit determination of the volume of each of said wood pieces, means
for weighing each of said wood pieces, computer means for calculating mass density of
each of said wood pieces based on said volume determined from said sensed dimension
and weight of each of said wood pieces as determined by said means for weighing, said
computer means comparing said calculated mass density with a predetermined mass
density and means for separating said wood pieces into groups based on said calculated
and said preselected mass densities for each of said wood pieces.

6. An apparatus as defined in Claim 5 further comprising means for sensingthe thickness of each of said wood pieces to provide data to determine said volume of
said wood pieces.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ Z7~

LUMBER MOISTURE CONTENT SORTER

Field of the Invention
-
Present invention relates to the measurement of
lumber moisture content, more particularly the present
invention relates to the measuring of the moisture content
of lumber and sorting the lumber based on moisture
content.

Background of the_Present Invention
The idea of sorting lumber based on moisture
content so that one may operate a kiln more efFiciently by
tailoring the drying cycle more accurately with the known
moisture content of the wood has been known for a number
of years, however, no effective means for properly sensing
the moisture content of the wood having a moisture content
of above about 30% moisture has been available.
It has been proposed to sense moisture content
based on infrared reflections. This technique seems to
work reasonably well with veneer but is not particularly
effective with thick sections as normally found in lumber,
~; particularly following storage after sawing.
It is known to measure the dimensions of
elements by sensing reflected light or other means such as
reflected infrared light or by means of x-rays so that the
physical dimensions of an article can be determined.
It is also known to utilize load cells to deter-
mine the weight of any given object.

Brief Descriction of the Present Invention
It is an object of the present invention to
provide a new technique for sensing the moisture content
of wood elements such as lumber pieces.
:



::
..~

~7~l~7:~

It is a further object of the present invention
to provide a system for sensing the moisture or percent
moisture of pieces of lumber and to sort the lumber in
accordance with the moisture or percent moisture content.
Broadly, the present invention comprises means
for sensing at least the major dimension of the lumber
article, means for sensing the weight said lumber article,
means for determining the density of said lumber article
and means for comparing the determined density with a pre-
selected mass density for determining the percent moisture
in the said wood element or sorting the wood elements.
In many cases the means for sensing the ma~or
dimension will comprise means for sensing the length of
the lumber article and wherein the width and thickness
dimensions will be preset (i.e. when the moisture content
of reasonably accurate dimensional lumber is being deter-
mined) so that the volume of the element can be calculated
based solely on the measurement of its length. Also in
- some case the thickness dimension will vary significantly
and must be sensed while the widths remain substantially
constant, in these cases the volume of the element can be
calculated based solely on the measurement of its thick-
ness and length.
Preferably the wood articles will then be separ-
ated on the basis of moisture content with those wood
articles having a percent moisture above a preset limit
being collected in one area and those with a moisture
content below said preset limit being collected in another
area.
Brief Description of the Drawinqs
Further features, objects and advantages will be
evident from the following detail description of the pre-
ferred embodiments of the present invention taken in
conjunction with the accompany drawings in which:

~7~


Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the
various elements forming the present invention.
Figure 2 is a schematic arrangement illustrating
the sensing devices feeding the microprocessor.
Figure 3 is a graph of number of lumber pieces
versus mass density (percent moisture) to indicate the
distribution of lumber pieces having various moisture
contents O

Description of the Preferred Embodiments
An investigation of clear lumber substantially
free of knots or rot proved conclusively that for a given
species the mass density based on green volume and oven
dry weight of the wood was substantially more uniform than
that of normal run of the mill wood from that species.
Based on this finding, it was concluded that the mass
density moisture content relationship for a given species
is reasonably constant for clear lumber.
Based on this observation, a moisture meter was
produced for lumber wherein the dimensions of each lumber
piece were sensed and the individual lumber pieces were
weighed to find their weights and based on these values
the volume and the density for each piece of lumber was
calculated. Based on this calculated mass density and the
predetermined mass density of the clear oven dry wood, the
percent moisture could be calculated for each wood piece.
- Obviously once the mass density for a selected moisture
content is known to separate on moisture content, one need
only determine the mass density of the lumber and compare
that with the mass density for the selected moisture
content.
Such a device is shown in Figure 2 wherein a
thickness measuring means 10 is used to determ~ne the
thickness of each lumber element 12, a width measuring
~ 35 device 14 senses the width of the lumber and a length

; - 3 -
, ~
:`
:
.

~278~7 ~

measuring device 16 senses the length of each lumber
element 12. The output of all of these sensors is sent to
a computer or microprocessor 18 which deterrnines the -
volume of each lumber element 12. These dimension sensors
10, 14 and 16 may be selected from any of a number of well
known sensors.
Load cells 20 (two shown) sense the weight of
each lumber piece 12. This sensed weight is fed to the
microprocessor 18 which then calculates the density of the
lumber element 12, compares this density with a preset
value for density for the preselected moisture content for
that particular species of lumber and based thereon gener-
ates a signal to operate the sorter 22 in accordance with
the mass density (moisture content) determined by pro-
cessor 18. If the moisture content of each piece is
desired the calculated mass density may be compared with
the predetermined mass density for clear lumber of that
; species with difference being attributable to moisture
differences and moisture content calculated. Normally the
invention will be used for sorting and the moisture
content of individual pieces need not be determined.
In many cases it will be unnecessary to sense
the thickness and width since for nominal sized lumber
these dimensions are reasonably accurately known and the
size of the lumber particularly the width and thickness
can be assumed from the nominal size being produced. In
such cases, only length need be measured. In some mills,
only length and thickness need to be sensed, i.e. where
the mill run has significant variations in thickness but
width is uniform.
Figure 1 shows a layout of a typical installa-
tion incorporating the present invention. As shown lumber
elements 12 are removed from a stack 24 onto a conveyor 26
having spaced lugs 28 adapted to move the lumber elements
along with the conveyor with the lumber elements being at

~ ~ .
- 4 -
~"
:


,"", ,

~27~ L


uniformly spaced intervals therealong. If it is desired
to sense the thickness of the lumber a suitable thickness
sensor 10 will be provided, simllarly if it is desired to
sense the width of the lumber a suitable sensor such as
the sensor 14 may be used. The length is sensed by the
sensor as schematically indicated at 16. In some install-
ations, a single sensor instrument may be used to deter-
mine all the required dimensions of the lumber pieces.
Discreet lumber elements 12 move off the end of
the conveyor 26 onto a roller chute 30 and the weight of
each element 12 is sensed by the sensor which in the
arrangement in Figure 2 is comprised of a pair of load
cells 20. The discreet lumber elements 12 are then
elevated by a conveyor 32 having spaced lugs 39 which
~5 engage and elevate the various lumber pieces 12 in spaced
regimented relationship up to the sorter bin generally
indicated at 22.
In the schematic arrangement shown in Figure 1,
the bin 22 includes a gate 36 that is pivoted between a
close position as illustrated and an open position as
shown by the dotted line. The position of this gate 36 is
determined by the microprocessor 18 which determines the
mass density of each lumber element which, as above
described, provides a sufficiently accurate indication of
the moisture content of each of the lumber pieces 12. The
location oF each of these lumber pieces is accurately
known since each lumber piece is carried by the lugs up
the conveyor 32 and it is known which lugs pick up each
lumber piece. The gate 36 is activated depending on the
mass density of the lumber element 12 such that if the
lumber element is to proceed into the top bin 38 the gate
36 is closed when the lumber element 12 is deposited in
the bin 22 and the lumber element slides over the gate 36
into the bin 38. On the other hand, if the mass density
(moisture content) is significantly different, i.e. on the
:

~ - 5 -

~278~7.~

opposite side of a preset mass density cut of-f point, then
the microprocessor 1~ controls the mechanism to open the
gate 36 to the dotted line position and permit the element
12 of this moisture content to pass into bin section 40 of
the sorter 22.

The control or cut off point for the separation
in the illustrated arrangement is a single selected mas
density (cut off point) so that lumber with a mass density
(moisture content) higher proceeds to one bin while lumber
elements with a lower mass density (moisture content)
proceed to a second bin. It will be apparent that more
than one cut off point may be set, i.e. there may be an
intermediate range so that all lumber in an intermediate
range of mass density (moisture content) falls into a
third bin with lumber elements of higher and lower mois-
ture contents going into their own separate bins. However,
since the degree of accuracy of the moisture content
determination (determination by mass density) decreases
with decreasing moisture content, it is preferred to use a
single cut off point at a relatively high mass density
(moisture content).
. .
In Figure 3, a preselected cut off point has
been indicated by the line AA. This cut off point is pre-
set into the microprocessor 18 so that all the lumber
pieces having a mass density to the left of the line AA
would be sorted into one bin and the high moisture content
lumber indicated by that portion of the curve to the right
~ 30 of the line AA would be received in a second bin.
:.
Generally, if a single separation line is to be
used that line should coincide with a speciFic moisture
content that generally will be in the range of 80%-110%,
preferably 90%-100% moisture and as above indicated lumber

-- 6 --

~;~7~7.~

pieces with a moisture content above the prescribed limit
will be separated from lumber below that level. It has
been found that for western red cedar 100% moisture coin-
cides with a mass density of about 620 kilograms/cubic
meter. Obviously this does not provide a precise measure-
ment of 100% moisture but is sufficiently accurate such
that separation of pieces with mass density above or below
the selected density results in a very significant
improvement in drying efficiency. For hemlock which
includes what is called sinker stock and contains wood
with very high moisture two separation lines may be used,
one in the range of 160%-190%, preferably 170%-180% and
the other in the range described above for a single separ-
ation line.
15It will be apparent from the position of line AA
in Figure 3 that by far the majority of the lumber falls
to the left of AA, however, the lumber to the right though
small in quantity would in a conventional system govern
the drying cycle. This small quantity of lumber having
moisture above the cut off point when dried together with
the rest of the lumber controlled the drying cycle for all
the lumber. This drying cycle, in some cases, caused
' damage to those lumber pieces having low moisture content.
With the present invention, the high mass
density (moisture content) material will be dried separ-
ately from the major portion of the lumber, each portion
will be kiln dried using a selected drying cycle specific
to that particular portion of the lumber. It has been
found following this practice for western cedar lumber
where line AA is at 100% moisture the majority of lumber,
i.e. the lumber to the left of the line AA in Figure 3 can
be dried in a significantly shorter period of time than if
all the lumber were kiln dried simultaneously (the time to
complete the drying cycle has been reduced by almost 50%
35 in some cases1. It has also b;en found that i~ the portion


.



.

1;~7~7:1

above the separation line AA, i.e. to the right of the
separation line AA, is separately kiln dried, its drying
cycle can also be keyed to its particular moisture content
and the time for drying this portion also reduced signifi-
cantly relative to when all of the lumber was driedsimultaneously.

While it is possible to separate into more than
two groups it is been found that the single separation
provides a very significant improvement and further separ-
ations while they can be used to advantage probably are
not economically justified.

Having described the invention modifications
will be evident to those skilled in the art without
departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in
the Claims.




- 8 -
,

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1990-12-18
(22) Filed 1987-01-27
(45) Issued 1990-12-18
Expired 2007-12-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1987-01-27
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1990-10-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1992-12-18 $100.00 1992-11-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1993-12-20 $100.00 1993-11-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1994-12-19 $100.00 1994-12-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1995-12-18 $150.00 1995-11-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 6 1996-12-18 $150.00 1996-11-22
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 7 1997-12-18 $150.00 1997-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 8 1998-12-18 $150.00 1998-11-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 9 1999-12-20 $150.00 1999-12-03
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2000-06-15
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2000-06-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 10 2000-12-18 $200.00 2000-11-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 11 2001-12-18 $200.00 2000-11-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 12 2002-12-18 $200.00 2000-11-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 13 2003-12-18 $200.00 2000-11-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 14 2004-12-20 $200.00 2000-11-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2001-05-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2002-09-26
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2002-09-26
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2003-07-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 15 2005-12-19 $450.00 2004-04-13
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 16 2006-12-18 $450.00 2004-04-13
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2005-09-06
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-08-08
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2006-08-08
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-02-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
COE NEWNES/MCGEHEE INC.
Past Owners on Record
CAE ELECTRONICS LTD. CAE ELECTRONIQUE LTEE
CAE INC.
CAE NEWNES LTD.
CAE WOOD PRODUCTS G.P.
COE NEWNES/MCGEHEE ULC
MACMILLAN BLOEDEL LIMITED
REDEKOP, ALFRED WILLIAM JOHN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1993-10-14 2 51
Claims 1993-10-14 2 76
Abstract 1993-10-14 1 16
Cover Page 1993-10-14 1 16
Description 1993-10-14 8 308
Representative Drawing 2001-05-16 1 15
Fees 1999-12-03 1 41
Correspondence 2002-12-02 1 13
Correspondence 2002-12-02 1 16
Correspondence 2002-11-20 5 133
Correspondence 2003-06-02 1 14
Correspondence 2003-06-02 1 21
Correspondence 2003-06-02 2 79
Correspondence 2003-07-14 2 89
Correspondence 2003-08-08 1 13
Correspondence 2003-08-08 1 15
Assignment 2003-07-17 24 1,123
Assignment 2003-09-08 5 187
Fees 2000-11-24 1 41
Fees 2004-04-13 1 33
Assignment 2005-08-12 122 4,906
Assignment 2005-09-06 3 159
Assignment 2006-08-08 45 2,000
Assignment 2007-02-14 59 2,052
Fees 1998-11-20 1 24
Fees 1997-11-13 1 21
Fees 1996-11-22 1 26
Fees 1995-11-29 1 27
Fees 1994-12-07 1 30
Fees 1993-11-19 1 19
Fees 1992-11-12 1 21
Maintenance Fee Payment 2000-06-16 1 39