Language selection

Search

Patent 1279760 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1279760
(21) Application Number: 538524
(54) English Title: MIXING DEVICE FOR VERTICAL FLOW FLUID-SOLID CONTACTING
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF MELANGEUR DE FLUIDE ET SOLIDE VENANT EN CHUTE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 23/405
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01J 8/02 (2006.01)
  • B01J 8/04 (2006.01)
  • C10G 11/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PEYROT, CLAUDE F. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • UOP INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: MACRAE & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1991-02-05
(22) Filed Date: 1987-06-01
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract




"MIXING DEVICE FOR VERTICAL FLOW FLUID-SOLID CONTACTING"

ABSTRACT
A fluid mixing apparatus which is used in a vertical flow-
solid contacting column having a fluid inlet and a fluid outlet at
opposite ends, two or more distinct beds of particulate material, and
which is operated with single or dual phase fluid flow. The mixing
apparatus comprises a vertical flow barrier, positioned intermediate
two adjacent beds of particulate material, having a substantially imper-
forate outer area and at least one central opening for passing fluid
between beds and a fluid impingement compartment located at the center
of the barrier. The impingement compartment has vertical sides contain-
ing at least two similarly sized inlet openings in communication with
the upstream side of the barrier for receiving the fluid flow detained
by the barrier into the compartment with the sides and inlet openings being
arranged so that the projection of all inlet axial centerlines lie in
a common horizontal plane and intersect at a point selected so that
fluid entering the compartment will converge at a centerpoint equidistant
from all inlet openings. Mixing is promoted by sizing the inlet openings
to produce fluid jets having a length at least equal to the distance
between the inlet openings and the centerpoint so that the fluid streams
impact turbulently. Fluid leaves the impingement compartment through
a fluid outlet comprising the central opening of the barrier, which is
in communication with the downstream side of the barrier and provides
a balanced flow out of the impingement compartment.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
CLAIMS:

1. A fluid mixing apparatus for use in a vertical flow fluid-solid
contacting column having at least one fluid inlet and a fluid outlet at opposite ends,
two or more vertically spaced discrete beds of particulate material, said
mixing chamber comprising:
a) a flow barrier, for substantially preventing the vertical
flow of fluid positioned intermediate any two adjacent beds, said flow
barrier having a substantially imperforate outer area and at least one
central opening for passing fluid between beds;
b) A fluid impingement compartment located at the center of
said barrier having vertical sides containing at least two substantially
identical inlet openings in communication with the upstream side of said
barrier for receiving the fluid flow detained by said barrier into the
compartment, said sides and inlet openings being arranged such that
the projection of all inlet axial centerlines lie in a common horizontal
plane and intersect at a point selected so that fluid entering the
compartment will converge at a centerpoint equidistant from all inlet openings, said
inlet openings being restricted in size to produce a fluid jet having a length at least
equal to the distance between said inlet openings and the centerpoint and at least
one fluid outlet comprising the central opening of said barrier having an open area
greater than the combined area of all inlet openings which is in communication with
the downstream side of said barrier and provides a balanced flow to the area
downstream of said barrier;
c) means on the upstream side of said barrier for conveying an equal
amount of fluid from the periphery of said barrier to each inlet opening;
d) means for redistributing fluid from the outlet of said compartment
over the downstream particle bed.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the impingement compart-
ment outlet consists of perforated plate, profile wire, or screen material.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the impingement compartment
is substantially rectangular in shape having circular inlet openings in
two opposed vertical sides and outlet openings in any of the remaining sides.



4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said conveying and redis-
tribution means consists of free zones between the carrier and the lower
and upper boundary of the particle zones.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the inlet openings of
said impingement compartment are sized for a velocity in the range of
4.6 to 15.2 m/s and the outlet openings of said impingement compartment
are sized for a maximum velocity of less than 4.6 m/s.
6. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the distance between
opposing inlet openings does not exceed six inlet opening diameters.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the maximum dimension of
the impingement compartment perpendicular to the inlet opening centerlines
does not exceed three inlet opening diameters.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said barrier comprises a
series of open parallel channels concave to the upstream particle zone
and connected by conduits such that fluid is collected in said channels
and conveyed to the impingement compartment.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


t)~l 7~




"MIXING DEVICE FOR VERTICAL FLOW FLUID-SOLID CONT~CTIN6"
. ~
FIELD OF THE INVE~TION
This invention relates g2nerally to the field of fluid-solid con-
tacting. More specifically, this inventicn deals with ~he mixin~ of fluids
between beds of particulate material. Included within the scope of this in-
vention is the mixing of single phase or tw~ phase ~luids.
BACKGP~OUND OF THE INVENTION
Fluid-solid contacting devices haYe a wide variety oiE applicatio~ Such
devices find common application in processes ~Eor hydrocarbon comers;ion and
adsorption columns for separation oi fluid components. ~hen the fhlid-solid
contacting device is an adsorption column the particula~e material will com~rise an
adsorbent through which the fluid passes. In the case of hydrocarbon conversion the
fluid-solid contàc~ing apparatus is typically a reactor containing catalys~. Typical
hydrocarbon conversion reactions that may be carried out are l~ydrogena~ion,
hydro~reating, hydrocracklng, hydrodealkyala~ion, etc.
Fluid-solid contacting devices to which thk invention apply are ~sranged
as an elongated cylinder having a ~ertical orientation through which an essentially
vertical flow oi fluid is maintained. JParticulate ma~erial contained in this ~ssel is
arran~ed in a seri~s of vertically spaced beds. Fluid enters the vessel t~ugh at~east vne inlet and outlet located at opposing ends. The fluid can Ilo~r throu~h ~e
reac~or ln a upflow or downflow fashion. I~ is also commonly kno~4n ~ add or
?O wi~h~raw fluid from between ~he particulate beds. This is comm~ly done in
a~dsorp~ion schemes where the oomposition of the fluid passin~ between particle ~ds
is changing or in hydrocarbon conversion processes wh~re a quench sys$em is ~ied to
cool ~luid as it passes between beds.
Changes in the compcsition or properties of the fluid passin~ lthrough the
2~ particular zone present little problem provided these changes occur uniformly. In
adsorp~ion systems these changes are the resul~ of reter-tion or displacanent o~fluids within the adsDrbent. For reaction systems changes in temperature as ~ell as
composition of the fluid are caused by the particulate catalyst material cor~ined in
~he bcds.
Nonur)iform Ilow oiE fluid throu~h these beds can be caused l~y pcor initial
rnixing of the fluid entering the bed or varia~ions in flow resistance across the

" '.'~-

7~ 3




particula~e bed. Variations in the flow resistar!ce across the bed can vary contact
time of the fluid within the par~icles thereby resulting in uneven reactions or
adsorption of the fluid stream passing through the bed. In extreme instances $his is
referred to as channelin~ wherein fluid o~e~ a limited portion of the bed is allowed
to move in a narrow open area with virtually no resistance to flow. When channeling
occurs a portion of the fluid passing throu~h the bed will have minimal contact with
the particulate matter of the bed. If the process is one of adsorption the fluidpassing through the channel area will not be absorbed, thereby altering the
composition of this fluid with respect to fluid passing through other portions of the
absorbent bed. For a catalytic reaction the reduction in catalyst contact time will
also alter the product composition of fluid as it leaves different portions of the
catalyst bed.
ln addition to problems of fluid composition, irregularities in the
particulate bed can also affect the density and temperature of ~he fluid passingthrou~h the bed. For many separation processes retained and displaced componentsof the fluid have different densities which tend to disrupt the flow profile through
the bed. Nonuniform contacting with the adsorbent particles will exacerbate ~he
problem by introducing more variation in thæ density of the fluid across the bed ~hereby further disrupting the flow profile of the fluid as it passes ~hrouKh the
particle bed.
In reaction zones ~emperature variations are most often associated with
nonuni~orm catalyst contact due to the endothermic or exothermic nature of such
systems. Nonuniforrn contact with the catalyst will adversely affec~ the reac~ion
taking place by overheatin~ or overcooling the reactants. This problem is most
~5 severe in exothermic reactions where the hi8her temperature can cause further
reaction of feed stock or other fluid components into undesirable products or can
introduce local hot spots that will cause dama~e to the catalyst and/or mechanical
components.
Therefore, in order to minimi~e 11le problems that are associated with
variations in fluid flow through beds of particulate material, methods of remlxing
fluid between beds o catalyst or adsorbents haYe been incorporated into a number
of processes. Devices for collecting and remixing a portion of the fluid moving
through a series o~ particle beds are shown in U.S. patents 3,6S2,~50 and 4 ,087 ,252 .
In these references, the remixing of the fluid is done in conjunction with the
addition o$ a second fluid into the mixing zone between beds. In both of these





reEerences~ mix;ng of ~he fluid passing between beds and the added fluid is
performed in a number oî discreet mixin~ chambers located in or between ~he lower
boundary of the upper bed and the upper boundary of the lower bed.
U.S. Patent 3,824,080 by Smith reveals an in~ernal reactor con~iguration
for rnixing fluid passing between beds independent of a second added fluid in that
zone. The Smith deYice collects a mixed phase fluid flow in a region between
particle beds having a horizontal baffle containing a central openin~ for passlng the
fluid between beds. This central opening has a flow diverter device which direc~s all
vapor flow through the top of the chamber and all liquid flow in through the sides.
In the Srnith invention, vapor and liquid irnpinge upon each other a~ right angles
thereby effecting remixing. After the remixed vapor and liquid passes through the
opening in the baffle it contacts another horizontal series of baffles ~or providing an
even flow of fluid over the downstream particle bed.
U.$. Pa~ent 3,598,541 by ~ennemuth et al teaches the remixing of fluid
passin~ between beds of particulate rnaterial by direct impin~ement with a quench
fluid added to the mixing zone. Mixin~ occurs in a centralized space through which
all fluid passes. The centralized space contains an annular area defined by two
vertically oriented cylinders. Fluid passing between beds enters via horizontally
projec$ing holes in the outer cylinder, while the quench fluid enters ~hrough
horizontally projecting holes in the inner cylinder. The lower end of the annular
rnixing zone communicates with the downstream particle zone to allow passage o
the mixed flui~.
An objec~ of the invention disclosed herein is to improve the mixing of
fluids passing between beds of particulant material. It is a further object of this
invention to achieve mixing of the fluid passing between beds independent of theaddition of a second fluid into the zone between particle beds. A further object OI
this inventlon is to provide a simpli~ied device for achieving mixin~ of fluid between
beds which is easily incorporated into a minimal space between particle beds.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
.

Therefore, in one embodiment this invention comprises a fluid mixing
chamber for use in a vertical flow fluid-solid con~acting vessel having fluid inlet and
~luid autlet at opposite ends, and ~wo or more vertically spaced discrete beds of
I~articulate material.

7~ 3


In a m~e specific embodimen~, the ~luid mixing charnber eomprises a
vertical flow barrier positioned intermediate two particle beds hav;ng a substan-
tially imper~orate ou~er area and a~ least one central opening for passing fluidbetween zones; a fluid impingement compartmen~ located at the center of said
5 barrier having vertical sides containing at kas~ ~wo iden~ical inlet openin~s
restricted in size ~o produce a fluid jet, ~vhich are in communication with ~he
upstream side of said barrier for receiving fluid de~airled by ~he barrier wi~h ~he
vertical sides being arranged such that the projection of all inlet axial
centerlines lie in a common horizontal plane and intersect at a point selected
lC to cause fluid entering ~he compartment ~o converge at a center point
equidistant from inlet openings and alithin the projection nf ~he fluid jets; at least
one fluid outlet frorn tl~e in pingemen~ compar~ment with an open area grea~er than
that of the iniet openings which is in commurlication with the downstream dde ofthe barrier and provides a balanced flow to ~he area downstream of the barrier;
15 means on the upstream side of said barrier for conveying an eslual amount of fluid
iErom tl~ periphery of the barrier to each inlet opening; and means for redistrlbuting
~luid ~rom the outlet of the impingement compartment over the downs~ream
particle bed.
More limited embodiments of ~is inven~ion inv~lve different means for
20 ~dding, distribut;ng, collecting or wi~hdr~wing ~luid ghat enters or exi~s the
impingement compartment and par~icular arrangemen~s or configurations of she
fluid collec~ion barrier between particle beds and t~ innpingement compartment.
There~ore, ln its broadest sense, this invention is directed ~o a centrally
located mixing ~cction for receivin~ ~ubs~an9ially the entire flow o~ fluid passing
into a downstream bed. This mixing section acts to thoroughly mix the fluid
and passes it to the downstrea~ particle bed in a balanced fashion to f~cili~ateredistribution of the fluid~ The mixing of the fluid is essentially derived by
the configuration of the mixing zone. In this zone equal jets of fluid are
directed into each other thereby producing turbulence which will promote vigor-
ous mixing within the mixing zone and proY~de the fluid effluent with a uni-
form composition~ Thus an important element of this invention is ~he provi-
sion of means for directing equal je~s of fluid into each other in order to
maximize turbulence tn mixing~ With this basic concept in mind, other objects,

t~ r~

~nbodiments and advantages of the inventi~n ~nll b.ecome ~eadily apparent
to those skilled in the art from the more detailed Jlescripti~n th~t f~ w~
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ~ GS
Fi~ure 1 sho~vs ~ partially cutaway elevation ~riew of ~ vertica~l flow
5 con~cting column having multipl~ s of catalyst and mixing devices located
between particle beds in accordance with this invention.
Figure 2 is an isome~ric YieW o~ ~he mixing device from figure 1 removed
from the rest of the column internals.
Figure 3 is a partial ~levation view of a downflow reactor with a
10 cutaway proportion showing a more limited embodiment o~ the mixing chamber
having a series of parallel channels for collecting fluid which passes ~rough a
rectangular mixing zone.
Figure ~ is a plan view of ~e channel collection system for the mi~ing
zone of Figure 3.
Fi~ùre 5 is an isometric view depicting thP mixing zone of Fiqures 3 an~l
wi~hin a portion o~ the channel.

DETAILFD DESCRIPTION OF THE INV~NTION

As previously mentioned, this invention relates to a rneans ~! mixing
fluid between particulate beds in a fluid-solid c~ntacting device. The basic
eJen ents of thls invention consist of a containment vessel, one or more beds ofparticulant material ~hat are disposed in vertically spaced zones and ~ mixing
chamber positioned between beds sf particlllate material. The inven~ion itself
resides in the particular arrangement of the mixlng chamber and the componen~s
loca~ed therein. A more complete understanding of the interrelation ~tween the
~5 ~arious elements within the mixin~ chamber and the vertical flow column ~n be
obtained from the figures provided.
~/ith specific reference to Figure 1 the cutaway elevatiorl view shows
the column 1 wi~h a fluid inlet no~zle located at its top and a fluid outlet bcated at
its bottom. l,ocated within this vessel are horizontal zones of catalyst 2t 12 and 14.
E~ach particle b~ is composed of solid particles which can be in the form
of pills, sphere cylinders or other extruded shapes~ The actual proper~ies of the
par~icles will depend upon the pr~ess which is carried out in the con~ainment
vessel. Ger~rally~ lthis means that the particles will consist of an adsorbent or a





catalyst. Above each p~r~icle bed is a layer of s~or~ material 3, which serves to
hold down the particles and enhance flow distrlbu~ion over the bed. This material
which is of~en ernployed, but not essential9 will ~dally cQnsist of ceramic balls or
other inert compositions having a regular shape. Support material ~ is also often
S provided beneath the particle bed to prevent migration of the catalyst particles
throughaperforatedplateprofileorscreenelement 5 that is used to de~ine the
lower boundary o~ the particle bed. Support ~ater;al at the bottom of the
catalyst bed is similar in shape and composition to that used above the bed
Located l~tween beds is the fluid collection and mixing region.
Immediately below the particle retention plate S is l~cated a fluid collection area 6.
This collec~lon area allows the transfer o~ ~luid across barrier pla~e 8 to the
impingernent compartment 7. As shown in Figure 1, the collection area can consist
of an empty space that allows fluid flow in a ~rizontal direction. However, as
discussed in more de~ail in conjunction with Figures 3, 4 and 5 the collection space
may be integral with the barrier 8 so that the ekments restric~ing fluid can also
direct the fluid to the impingement compar~ment. Therefore, means for collectingfluid is no~ meant to be limi~ed to any sne confi~ura~ion but coneemplates any
means for passing fluid ~o the impin~ement compartment. In its simplist iEorm, the
~low barrier 8 will consist o~ a plate attached and ~aled at the column wall andhaving an open center over which impingement co~p~rtment 7 is located. 1 loweYer,
the barrier can take on any ~orm provided it substantially prevents ~luid ~low at any
location except through the impingement compartment openin~s. The limitation o~
~he barrier or baffle ~o substan~ially prevenit fiuid flow recognizes that particulate
material from the various beds is often unload~ from ~e bottom o~ the vessel
~hrough ~he overlying l~eds. In order to accomplish this unloading, verticaJ conduits
are commonly prbYided in the grids between the beds to allow the passage of the
- particulant rma~erial from one bed to the next for vvithdrawal from the contacting
column. 1~ is wi~hin ~he contemplation of this invenlion ~hat the barrier will contain
several S~ll conduits. These conduits are U5Uall)' left open but packed with thepreYiously described inert support material. These~ore, resis~ance to fluid $10wthrough ~ese conduit~ is much ~reater than that of the herein described impinge-ment compartment and collection system. Conse~ntly ~he amount o~ fluid pa~sing
through ~ese conduits should be less than S% o~ ~e total flow of fluid between
bc~s~
The impin~ement compartment, whidl ~ hereinafter described in more

detail, receives fluicl from the coliection space 6 and, after thorough mixin~, allows
it to pass throu~h the barrier 8. Below ~he barrier 8 is ano~her space 10 that alls~ws
redistribution of the fluid. Once again in its simplest form this redistribution area is
simply a space between the outlet of the impingement compartment and the top of
the downstream catalyst bed. Nevertheless, it is possible to include other devices
such as baffle plates, flow diverters or vapor-liquid trays to fur~her aid in the
redistribution of flow over the top of the downstream catalys~ bed. ~ithin the
redistribution area 10 is shown a nozzle and a pipe system 9 for adding fluid orwithdrawin~ fluid from the contacting column. In the case of separation processes
~his nozzle can be used to add or withdraw selected component streams. The
specific application of this nozzle for downflow reactors is the addition of a quench
medium to cool the reaction medium entering the next catalyst bed. While the
nozzle and pipe system in Figure 1 has been shown below barrier 8, it is a!lso wiShin
the contemplation of this invention that the nozzle and pipe system be located
above barrier `8 and possibly in the uppermost por~ion of the downstrearn catalyst
bed or the lowermost portion of the upstream catalyst bed. The mixed ~uid ~tlen
enters the next bed of particulant material from which it rnay continue ~hrough
subsequent remixin~ zones and particulate beds before leaving the column through a
suitable outlet.
Figure 2 depicts one embodiment of the impingement compartmen~.
This particular irnpingement compartment is composed of two sides having inlet
openings 16 and 17; a wire screen outlet 2û on the bottom; an lmperforate top plate
13 and imperforate sides 18 and 19. The impingement compartmer~t is not
restricted to any par~icular shape. For example the impingement compartment
23 could consist of a vertically oriented cylinder with side inlets and a bottom outle~.
Nevertheless, there are some general dimensional limi~ations which are her~inafter
discussed in more detail. The basic function of the impingement compartment is to
provide intimate mixing of the fluid passing between beds of particulant material.
Such mixing is achieved throu~h the orientation and sizing of inlet opening 16 and
17. These openings are sized such that a jet or concentrated stream of fluid enters
through each openin~. The inlets are positioned such that the fluid jets impact upon
each other in opposing fashion at a central point of the impingement compartment.
In Figure 2 only ~wo inlet openings are shown, however it is possible to have more
than two inlet openings provided the openings are located in a symmetrical ~ashion
which balances the irnpin~ement of the jets in all directions. Also importan~ to this

7~




invention is the vertical orientation of the inlet openings. All inlets should be
located at the same elevation. Thls equal elevation is necessary to pro~.ride equal
velocity impingement with no unbalanced componen~ Lastlyg in terms of shape,
there is no necessity that the inlet openings be round. The only essentia
requirement of the inlet opening shape is the restric~ion o~ i~s cross sectional area
such that the necessary fluid je~ is formed.
Obviously, the size and number of the openings will determine the length
of the flu}d jet ~or any given pressure drop through the impingement compar~rnent.
However, since it is usually desirable to minimlze pressure drop in the vertical flow
column practical conslderations will restrict the length of the jet. As is well known
by those skilled in the art, the pressure drop is a f~ion of f~uid Yelocity and
average fluid density. Methods of calculating jet lengths and pressure drops over an
opening or series of openings are well known by ~hose skllled in the ar~. Por most
fluids to which this invention will be applied, the openings are sized for a velocity in
the range of 4.6 to 15.2 m/s. The mixing compar~nent must be sized to
insure that the jets of fluid will impact with sufficient velocity to thoroughly mix
the fluid. Therefore the distance between any inlet o~ning and the cen~er point of
~he impingement compartment mus~ not exceed 6û96 o~ the je~s calculated length.
~hus the pressure drop and jet length consideratios~s will dictate the len~th ordiameter of the irnpingemen~ compartment.
Although any shape of lmpingement compartment can be used, a square
or rectangular implngement compartment having only two inlet openings is
particularly preferred because of its simplicity and adaptability to the channelcollection device hereinafter described. Where there are only two circular openings
in the impingement compartment, the maximum distance between openings should
not exceed six times the diameter of the inlet openines and preIerably will be less
than three inlet opening diameters. The reduced sp~cin~ between inlets tends to
increase turbulence and promote better mixin~. Of course some distance between
inlet openings must be maintained. The minimum dis1ance is required to allow
sufficient outlet opening area and stlll maintain the required length to width ratio
for the impingement compartment.
Furthermore, in order to maxirnize turbu5ence or mixing, the overall
height of the mixing compartments should not exceed four times the vertical
dimension o~ the inlet opening. Likewise, in order to prevent stagnant areas in
rectan~ular con~igurations, the width of the irnpingement compartment should also

.7~3~7~3
be restricted to four times ~he hori20ntal dimension of the inlet openings. In the
case of a circular cross xctit~n impingement compartment composed of a vertically
ori~nted cyllnder~ ei~her ~he restrictions on inlet openings, spacing or maximumwidth limitations may govern the diameter of the compartrnent.
Referring ag~in to Figure 2, the impingement eompartrnent contains at
least one outl~t opening 20. Th~ most important res~riction on ~he outlet opening is
that its open cross sectional area exceed that o~ the to~al cross sectional
area of the inlet openings. This is of course necessary to allow jets of
fluid to form at the inlets to the compartment. In terms of velocity, it
is usually desirable to design the outlet so that the velocity does not
exceed 4.6 m/s and is preferably less than 3 m/2. Although
it is not necessary to provide any form of restriction over the outle~, the opening
may include profile wire as shown in Figure 2, or perfora~ed plate or wire screen.
These outlet restrictions are often used to impro~re flow dis~ribution, ~rap
particulate material or minimize the foaming that can occur as a result of the
turbulen~ mixin~ of certain fluids. In addition the location of the outlet o~ning is
not restricted to any particwlar side of the compartment and the outlet
opening may in fact be multiple openings. The ou~let opening
or openin~s may be located In any side of the impingement cornpartment ~rhich is in
communication with the dswnstream portion of the mixing chamber as iong as the
opening or openings are symmetrical wi~h the center line of the impingement
compartment. The only limitation on she outlet opening or openings is that the
lccation be symmetrical with respect to the downs~ream bed so that a balanced flow
of fluid out of 2he impingernent chamber is delivered to the downstream particulate
bed. In this way~ redis~rlbution of ~he fluid over ~he bed of particulan~ matter is
facilita~ed.
Although Figure 1 generally depicts an arrangement for a downflow
reactor, this invcntion is not limi~ed ~o a single flow directiGn through the column.
In the case of an Lpflow reactor, the inlets must be in cornmunic~tion with the lower
particle bed and the impingement chamber reversed so that the outlet of the
impingement compartn en~ opens into an upper redistribution zone. Thus the mixing
chamber of this invention is equally applicable to upflow ~r downflow con-
figurations.
As noted in the prior art, many of the intermediate mixing devices use
addition oiE an external fluid as an integral part of the mixing operation. Con-~ersely, this apparatus do2s not require any external fluid addition to effect mixing
of the fiuid passing between beds oiE particulant material. Thus thls invention has

~`t~

the advantage of provicling ~ood mixing o~ fluid passin~ between beds independent of
the addition or withdrawal of fluid. Another advantage of this invention is the
overall simplicity and compactness of the impinge~~ent compartment. These
features make it possible to incorporate the mixing chamber of this invention into
the existing space between a series of particulate beds without extensive modifi-
cation of the contacting 70ne internals.
Apart from the impingement compartment, other components o~ the
mixing chamber consist of the previously mentioned di~ributors, support materials,
baffles and pipe grids. The design of these components depenclson a number of
10 ~actors. Among these factors are the allowable pressure drops for the equipment,
the composition of the fluid passing between partWe beds and the operating
conditions within the contacting zone. In addition, far mixed phase systems, ~hequantity of vapor or liquid passin~ between beds will largely dicta~e the type of
baffles required, the size of inlet and outlet openings ~hrough the barrier and the
15 appropriate re~istribution means. Other consideratior~s that will affect the overall
sizing and configuratlon of ~he mixing chamber is ~he addition of a quench. The
placement and operation of the quench distribution system will require additional
space within the mixin~ zone. Of coursel the factors mentioned here by no means
exhaust the list of mechanical and process considerations that will go int~ designing
20 the mixing chamber. However, such considerations are vell know by those skilled in
the art and do not require fs~rther elabora~ion.
The mixing device of the invention is es~æcially sui~ed for use in a
downflow reactor in combination with a barrier or baffle plate composed of a seties
of channels. Such a reactor is advan~ageously employed ~o carry out hydrogena~ion7
25 hydrotreating, hydrocracking and hydrodealkylation re~ctions. ~hen performin~exothermic reactions, such as hydrotreating and hydr~:racking, a quench stream is
usually added between catalyst beds to control the t~perature of the reactants.
Operation of the mixing zone independent of ~he quench stream as offered by thisinvention is of particular advantage for these exothennic reactions. As catalyst30 deactivates with continued operation of the reac~on zone, the amount or
temperature of the quench, which usually consis~s of hydrogen, must be reduced.
The reduction of cooling requirements for the quench poses problems in remixing
zones that employ the quench as part of the mixing op~ion. In such schemes, it is
often necessary ~o vary the ternperature o~ the quenc~ in order to achieve reduced
35 cooling while still maintaining an adequate liquid volume addition of quench medium


to the mixing zone. Since the quench in my invention is added independent of ~heimpin~ ment compartmen~, varying the amount of quench will have little efiEect on
th~ mixing of reactants.
Nevertheless it is also important to obtain good mixing of the quench
stream and the reactants. Thus while it may be possible to obtain adequate mixing
of the quench by a pipe distribution system located downstream of the impingement
compartment"ocating the quench distribu~ion system upstream of the impingement
compartment is particularly advantageous. With the quench stream located ahead
of the impingement compartment there are two opportunities for the quenching
medium to mix with the reactants. First mixing of the quench medium occurs at the
initial dis$ribution point of the quench into the reactants and a~ain when the quench
and reactants flow through the impingement compartment.
Attention is now drawn to ~i~ures 3, 4 and 5 wherein a specific
combination of a quench system9 vertical flow barrier and impin~ement
compartment `are incorpora~ed beneficially into a down~low reactor. in this
embodiment, an overall flow scheme in accordance with Figure 1 is employed. Thus reactants enter a vertically elongated reactor and flow through a series of catalyst
beds and intermediate mixing charnbers. Looking now at Figure 3, additional details
of the intermediate mixing portion are shownO
In this arrangement reactants flow downwardly through catalyst bed 22
while a quench medium is added at nozzle ~3 and distributed over a lower cross
section of the catalys~ bed by pipe distribution system 24. The reactants con~inue
~hrough support material 25 which rests on a wke mesll screen 21. IJpon passing
through ~he screen reactants and quench mediurn are collected in a series of parallel
channels 27, 61 and 62, which run in a horizvntal direction and are open to the upper
catalyst bed. Fluid is conveyed Erom the outer channels 27 through the interrnediate
channels 61 to the center channel 62 by means of conduits ~8 and 29 which allow
fluid flow between channelsO The center channel is divided into two parts by theimpingement compartment 30 as shown in Figure 4. In order to provide equal
amounts of fluid to each side of the impingement compartment, four conduits 29 are
used to provide an equal flow of fluid on each side of the compartment. Fluid
leaving the ~tlet of the compartment enters redistri~ution zone 40 where vapor and
liquid are redistributed over the entire area of the lower catalyst bed. In order to
prornote bet~er dis~ribu~ion of the mixed vapor and liquid stream, a vapor liquid
redistributor tray 51 is located at the top of the lower catalyst bed. These types of

7 ~ i 3
12
trays are well known ~o those skilled in the art and consist o horizontal tray portion
51 and vertical conduits 50 loca~ed therein having a co~ered top, V-notch opening in
an upper portion for receiving vapor and perforated side por~ions adjacent the upper
tray surface for allowing the passage of liquid. Following passa~e through the vapor
liquid redistributor tray the fluid enters another open region 52 where further
redistribution may take place. Fluid then passes through a layer of support material
53 and continues on through the next catalyst bed 54.
A more complete understanding of the ~rrangement of the collection
channels and impingement compartments can be obtained from Figure ~ which shows
a plan view of these internals. The ends of the channels have closures that match
the outline of the containment vessel. Outer collection s~aces 27 may be connected
to the next inward channels by means of a single conduit 28. The conduits
connecting channels are designed for minimum pressure drop. The maximum fluid
velocity through conduits 28 and 29 shall not exceed 4.6 m/s and is
preferably less than 3 m/s. Fluid collected in inte~mediate channel 61
along with fluid from outer channels 27 passes throuE h central channel 62 whichcontains impingement compartment 30. Fluid is directed into the central channelsin a sylTmetrical fashion to provide an equal volum~ of fluid to either side oF the
compartment. Figure 4 also shows vertical concluits 55 ~hich are used in unloading
catalyst from the reactor as previously discussed.
Figure 5 shows the impingement compartmellt which ~s located in central
channel 62. As can be appreciated from the drawin~, the impingement compar~ment
is integral with the channel on three sides 56, S7 and S8. These sides contain aperforated sectlon in the area of ~he impingement cornpartment which serves as an
outlet for the mixed fluid. In this particular embodiment the opposing sides 59 and
63 contain inlet openings 60 in the form of circular ori~ices and are Df a lesser
height than the depth of the channel. This reduced hei~h~ allows additional fluid
passa~e over the top of the impingement compartment 59 which serves to equalize
any imbalance in fluid flow to the inlets. However, it is also possible to have the
end plates containing the inlet openings completely block the cross sectional area of
the channel.
This embodiment is not meant to limit ~he ~ay in which a channel may
be integrated wi~h the impingement chamber. The impingement chamber and
channels of this invention may be combined in any number of arrangements. Other
possibilities include having the inle~ streams to the impingement compartment flow

13
in a direction perpendicular to ~he major axis of the channels or usin~s an e~ven
number of channels with the impingement compartmen~ located between two center
channels.
Those familiar with the design of reactor internals can readily appre-
ciate the economy in the arrangement of internals depicted in Figure 3. First the
fluid collection channel which also forrr~the bar~ier or baffle for the vertical flow of
flow are compact and require little vertical space wi~hin the reactor. In addition,
these channels are easily Eabricated with a support flange portion 42 to fi~ upon a
series of parallel support beams 26 which are frequently used to hold up the catalyst
bed. Moreover no additional space is required for the impingement compartment
which can be conveniently located in the central channel. The location s)f the
channel collection system is also advanta~eous in that it does not interfere with the
location of the quench distribution system on the upper portion oE the support
beams. Thus whether incorporated in a downflow reac~os or more generally in any
vertical flow fluid solid contacting column the collection channel and impingement
compartment offer unique benefits to an intermediate mixing zoneD

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1991-02-05
(22) Filed 1987-06-01
(45) Issued 1991-02-05
Deemed Expired 1998-02-05

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1987-06-01
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1987-08-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1993-02-05 $100.00 1993-01-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1994-02-07 $100.00 1994-01-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1995-02-06 $100.00 1995-01-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1996-02-05 $150.00 1996-01-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UOP INC.
Past Owners on Record
PEYROT, CLAUDE F.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-10-15 13 779
Drawings 1993-10-15 2 72
Claims 1993-10-15 2 78
Abstract 1993-10-15 1 38
Cover Page 1993-10-15 1 16
Representative Drawing 2001-08-14 1 29
Fees 1996-01-18 1 70
Fees 1995-01-19 1 70
Fees 1994-01-17 1 64
Fees 1993-01-11 1 52