Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~L3~23g
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an oceanographic water sampling
bottle.
BACKCROUN~ OF THE INVENTION
Current practice in seawater sampling requires sample acquisition in
conjunction with the use of vertically profiling electronic sensors on a
probe such as the CT~ (conductivity-temperature-depth) probe. Sampling
bottles are therefore clustered near the probe in a sampling rosette
where thelr closure can be triggered electro-mechanically by the operator
or a computer at the surface. Normally, rosette and probe fall through
the water at about 0.5 m/s, but higher fall rates are very desirable in
order to minimize the use of expensive station (aircraft or ship) time.
The major limitation on descent speed and attitudinal stabllity of the
assembly is the fluid drag associated with the sampling bottles in the
rosette.
In typical prior devices considerable drag is associated with
the closure mechanism for the sampling bottles. Typically, the closure
mechanism of prior sampling bottles comprises hinged caps that pivot
outwardly from the bottle periphery presenting a larger cross-sectional
area to the flow and producing flow separation and stagnant regions
within and around the bottles which both result in increased drag.
Although fluid drag can be reduced by decreasing the number of
bottles on the rosette, this increases the required number of casts to
complete a profile and hence increases station time.
An additional problem in current practice is leakage of sea-
water into a sample following its acquisition. Sample contamination
through leakage is critieally detrimental to salinity determination.
Leakage occurs in response to pressure differences between the inside of
- 1 -
39
a bottle and its environment as a result of changing ambient pressure
during the profiling procedure.
During water sampling in winter in fro~en polar seas, ice
accumulation in the bottle interior, either when the bottle is initially
immersed following chilling in the atmosphere or when the bottle and the
contained sample are retrieved, causes sample contamination or irrevers-
ible changes in the salinity and chemical composition of the sample.
For water sampling in Arctic seas a sampling device with a
cross-section of less than about 10 inches is advantageous as holes of
such size can be augered with manually operated equipment. With pres-
ently available bottles only one bottle can be used per cast through such
auger holes.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a water sampling bottle
comprising; a tubular container defining member having an inlet and
outlet end; each end having an inner surface portion defining an annular
valve seat; closure means, comprising a pair of streamlined valve members
one of which i~ associated with each of the said inlet and outlet end and
disposed for operatively seating against the respective valve seat;
releasable retaining means for releasably retaining the valve members
away from its respective valve seat whereby the tubular member defines an
open conduit prior to sample acquisition; a resilient connecting member
biasing said valve members toward one another onto its respective seat,
and operative to confine a sample within the tubular member upon release
of said retaining means.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINC
3o
Figure 1 is a partly sectioned view of the water sampling
bottle o~ the present invention.
~L30~2~
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference to Figure 1, the oceanographic sampling bottle
comprises a tubular member 1 in which each of the open ends 2 define an
inlet or outlet. An inner surface portion 3 of each end 2 defines an
annular valve seat for a valve member 5 that provides closure means for
the sampling bottle. The valve members are shown in the open posltion 5~
and the closed position 5'. The valve members 5 have a streamlined shape
and are positioned coaxially with respect to the tubular member 1.
Preferably the valve members and the tubular member will have a circular
cross-sectional shape.
Preferably, the tubular member 1 is provided with an enlarged
streamlined end portion 4 which surrounds and protects the valve member 5
and facilitates streamlined flow around the valve member. In order to
provide streamlined flow, the size and shape of the enlarged portion 4
and valve member 5, the cro~s-sectional area of the flow passage around
the valve member 5, perpendicular to the flow, should be s~bstantially
constant and substantially equal to the cross-sectional flow area (13)
through the tubular member 1.
The valve members 5 are interconnected by resilient connecting
means 7 that bias the members 5 toward one another onto the respective
seat 3.
For each of the valve members 5, there is provided releasable
retaining means shown in the form of a cable 8 for releasably retaining
the valve away from the seat. The cable 8 is guided by suitable guide
means 9 attached to the member 1 and is controlled remotely by a suitable
trip mechanism 10 of a conver1tional typeO
The resilient connecting means 7 is shown in the form of a
resilient tubular conduit having a passageway 11 that vents by intercon-
necting passageway 12 to a region outside of the seat, and outside of the
sample confining region 13.
~ 3 ~
~3~4~3~31
The valve members 5 have a hydrodynamically streamlined shape
to avoid flow separation and resistance within and around the sampling
bottle when the members are in the unseated open position for the
descent. The closure members may be provided with additional sealing
means, shown in the form of an O-ring 14 to ensure sealing the contents
when in the seated closed position 5'.
The sampling bottle is shown with a drain valve 16 and vent 17
(both shown in the open position) to facilitate recovery of the sample.
These valves will preferably have low displacement to minimize the
trapped volume and hence minimize possible contamination of the sample.
In operation~ with reference to Figure 1, the procedure for use
may be similar to current practice. Typically a plurality of sampling
Oottles are grouped in the form of a rosette. The valve members 5
are open, and the drain and vent valves 16 and 17 are closed, during the
descent to the desired sampling depth.
With the present invention, it can be seen that the open
bottles present an hydrodynamically streamlined geometry which provides a
relatively hlgh descent rate. The reduction in drag is achieved by two
means: Firstly, the valve members of the sampling bottles remain axially
centered on the tubular body 1 when the bottle is open rather than being
hinged out to occupy adjacent space as in other prior designs; secondly,
the two valves are designed to allow them being disposed within the
sampling bottle wall, whereas in other prior designs, valves are bulky
and project beyond the periphery. Efficient flow of seawater through the
sampling bottle during descent, is achieved by the streamlined shape and
relative positioning o~ the valve members and of the inlet/outlet ends to
ensure non-separated flow through the annular regions surrounding the
valYe members, and minimizing stagnant regions.
When the desired depth is reached, one or more of the sampling
bottles are closed by release of the retaining means 10 in a conventional
manner. Upon release both of the pair of closure members 5 are forced
onto the respective seat 3 by the force of the resilient interconnecting
means 7 to the position 5'.
- 4 -
13~423~
Equalization of the pressure of the sample and of the ambient
fluid i9 achieved by ventlng the hollow centre 11 of the resilient tubu-
lar conduit 7 (which also provides the tension holding the closure
members in place) outside through passageways 12. Since the tubing is
resilient, over- or under-pressure within the sampling bottle, which
might otherwise occur during ~rofiling, is avoided and sample seating is
more readily obtained.
The present sampling bottle, by having the valve members
confined to the bottlet occupies a relatively small cross-sectional area,
as compared with previous designs, and thus also allows a more compact
rosette or cluster of bottles.
The present streamlined design, specifically the reduction
o~ proJecting parts, makes the present sampling bottle less susceptible
to ice accretion in polar applications.
To maxlmlze the thermal inertia of the sampllng bottle, it will
preferably be constructed of a material (e.g. plastic) having low thermal
diffusivity, and a wall thickness as large as possible consistent with
other design requirements.
A material found to have suitable properties for the sampling
bottle is polymethylpentene. This material has suitable thermal
properties and low absorption and hence minimal susceptibility to con-
taminat ion .
- 5 -
