Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~.3~
PRINTER FOR THREE DIMENSIONAL LENTICULAR PRINT MATERIAL
SPECIFICATION
sAcKGRouND OF THE INVENTION
15 The present invention is generally directed to
autostereoscopic picture production and in particular to such
production employing lenticular print material, whereby a
novel method and apparatus are disclosed for composing a
three-dimensional print from a number of two-dimensional
views of an object field without requiring precise control of
the lens-film arrangement.
A known method for composing such prints uses a
conventional two-dimensional camera to photograph an object
field from different vantage points, thereby producing a
negative film whose frames each contain a view of the object
field from the respective vantage point at which the frame
was exposed. These two-dimensional views are then projected
sequentially or simultaneously by an imaging system through a
27279-560/9910
~30~
lenticular screen to expose the photosensitive emulsion
beneath the lenticules.
In connection with these known three-dimensional
printing processes, the lenticular print material employed
therewith ordinarily requires each of the frames of the
negative film to be exposed within an assigned angular zone.
The sum total of all of the angular exposure zones is chosen
so as to match what is commonly termed the acceptanee angle
of the lenticule. This acceptance angle is simply the
arcuate zone to which any incoming light must be restricted
in order to properly expose ~he photosensitive material
beneath the lenticule. In order to achieve this angular zone
exposure, one prior art technique employs a dynamic film-lens
arranqement whereby the film and lens move during exposure to
continuously scan each frame across its assigned angular
exposure zone, commonly known as proportional scanning. A
detailed discussion of this method is found in U.S. Patent
No. 4,120,562.
This known angular exposure technique requires
precise proportional tracking of the relative motion of the
lens and film, as well as minimal amounts of lens distortion
in order to provide ~ubstantially uninterrupted and non-
overlapping image bands on the lenticular film, while match-
ing the acceptance angle of the lenticular print film. Such
dependency upon precise control of the lens-film arrangement
subjects this known method to other factors, e.g. vibration,
which tend to lessen the quality of the print.
Further disadvantages of prior art composing
methods and the machinery used to implement them include
difficult and expensive manufacturing and maintenance
27279-560/9910
~ 3 Oi41~
techniques, a~ well as frequent calibration and an inherently
large size.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
~he present invention is directed to a novel method
S and apparatus for effecting a non-scanned exposure of three-
dimensional lenticular print materialO The equipment used to
implement the method is easily and inexpensively manu-
factured, requires little maintenance and calibration, is
small and compact, and substantially immune to environmental
influences such as vibration.
According to one embodiment of the present inven-
tion, a method of effecting a three-dimensional print by a
non-scanned exposure of three-dimensional lenticular print
material is provided wherein a lenticular print material and
a film having a plurality of exposed frames ther~on are
placed in opposing and parallel imaging planes and a lens and
a periscope are positioned be~ween the film and the print
material. The periscope includes first and second parallel
~ront surfaced mirrors positioned so as to reflect light
along an optical path from ~he film through the lens to the
print material, with each of the parallel mirrors being
rotatabl~ about a first axis normal (90) to the optical axis
of the lens and a second axis intersecting the first axis.
Each of the frames is placed a predetermined linear
distance from the optical axis of the lens to create a
plurality of angular exposure zones corresponding to the
plurality of the frames while the frame corresponding to the
angular exposure zone is illuminated for delivering an image
exposure of the frame to the print material along the center
27279-560/9910
~3~6~
of the angular exposure zone. The translation (or offset) of
the image exposure delivered by the periscope from the lens
alonq the center of the angular exposure zone is removed by
rotating the periscope abo~t the first axis~ Rotating the
S periscope about the second axis restores the optical axis
path to its original length.
RRIEF DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
Fig, l(a) is a schematic assembly view of a print
e~posure apparatus in accordance with the present invention~
Figs. l(b) and (c) are side and rear elevational
views of the assembly of Fig. l(a), respectively;
Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the angular exposure
zones and optical path offset of an image exposed without the
periscope arrangement of the present invention;
Fig. 3 is a schematic view of a fast enlarging lens
with a rectangularly shaped exit pupil used in accordance
with the embodiment of Fig. l(a);
Fi~s. 4(a) and (b) are two plan views of the
apparatus showing the removal of image offset by the
periscope; and
~ ig. 5 is a diagrammatic view showing the optical
path length components of one embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EM~ODIMENTS
With reference to Fig. l(a), there is shown an
arrangement for effecting a non-scanned exposure of three-
dimensional lenticular material in accordance with the pres-
ent invention. Film 10 is shown with four frames FRl-FR4
~3~
27279-560/9910
thereon. As described hereinbefore, the frame~ FRl-FR4
repre~ent four images of a photographic ~cene taken at four
spaced horizontal vantage points. Cameras for taking such
images are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,120,562.
s
As shown in Fig. 2 with reference to ~igs. l(a)-
~c), and particular to ~rame FRl, each frame i~ projected so
as to deliver light to the print material within assigned
angular æones Zl-Z4. It is to be understood that the arcuate
sum total of the angular exposure zones is chosen so as to
match the aforede~cribed acceptance angle of the len~icule,
and the division of the total angular exposure zone quanti-
tatively matches the number of vantage points for which film
l~ exposures are provided. -For in~tance, if the total angular
exposure ZQne Z~ for all four frames FRl-~R4 is 26, then
each frame must deliver light to print material 20 over a
zone approximately equal to 26/4, or 6.5 wide.
Thi~ to~al projection angle of the composing
apparatus is chosen in order to match the previously
described acceptance angle of the lenticular print film.
Further providing various projecting angle~ allow~ for
composition of the three-dimensional image with substantially
uninterrupted and non-overlapping image bands on the lenticu-
~5 lar print material. The arrangement shown in Fig. 1accomplishes this matching without the use o the afore~
described prior art proportional ~canning.
With further reference to Fig. 2, there is shown in
dotted-line portion each of the four anqular zo~e3 Zl-Z4,
wherein Zl represents the exposure zone coverin~ the angular
-5
~3~ 6 27279-560/9910
displacement from ~13 to +6.5~, Z2 the zone covering angular
displacement from +6.5 to 0, Z3 the zone coverinq angular
displacement from 0 to -6.5 t and Z4 the zone covering
angular displacement from -6 5 to -13, with angular dis-
placement and sign referenced from the optical axis 16 oflens 15, which is parallel with lenticular axis 26.
Four fixed exposures are to be made by placing the
frames FRl-FR4 in a relative position with respect to the
fixed lens 15 such that the exposure angle is the midpoint of
each oE the four exposure zones Zl-Z4. For simplification,
Fig. 2 shows only the exposure angle Zl~ which represents
the center of the Zl exposure zone, each of the other three
exposure zones having similarly corresponding exposure angles
Z2' ~z3 and ~z4. In the instant example, if Zl represents
the exposure zone coverifig angular displacement from +13 to
~6.5, then Zl equals 9.75, the center of exposure zone Zl
and, similarly, ~Z2 equals +3.25, az3 equals -3.25 and z4
equals -9.75. Thus, the necessary exposure angles are de-
Eined and set by predetermined linear displacements of each
frame FRl-FR4 away from the lens optical axis 16.
In a preferred embodiment, a projection illumina-
tion lamp 9 illuminates film 10 from below so as direct light
towards lens 15, which is a fast enlarging lens having a
sufficiently large exit pupil to fill the entire 6.5-wide
~5 exposure zone. A minimum F/l.9 is recommended, as well as
additionally shaping the aperture diaphragm in a rectangular
fashion as shown in Fig. 3, so as to produce a flat exposure
across the entire exposure zone.
It is easily seen that the resultant image at the
print plane 21 would be offset from the lens optical axis 16
27279-560/9910
~3~
(system centerline3 by a distance A if the exposure were made
in a straight enlarging system as shown in Fig. 2. To
compensate for this offsetting distance, in accordance with
the invention, the light path is folded so that the image i5
S translated back across the optical axis 16 by the first
periscope mirror and then delivered to the print material
(with the offset removed) by the second mirror. As shown in
Fig. l(a), periscope 17, including horizontally mounted
parallel mirrors 18 and 19 interposed between the film 10 and
print material 20, provides the appropriate image translation
removal while preserving the exposure angle ~Zl without any
resultant image rotation. This is further illustrated in
Figs. 4(a) and (b), which show the path of the folded light
from frame FRl through lens 15 and periscope 17 to print
material 2d in accordance with the instant embodiment of the
present invention. Mirrors 18 and 19 are placed so as to
focus the image exposed at exposure angle ~Zl directly on
prin~ material 20 without any image offse~. Periscope 17 is
rotated about an axis-x in order to remove thi~ image trans-
lation without introducing imaqe rotation, while preservingexposure an~le azl. For each exposure angle azl-~z45 there
i~ a corresponding rotational setting about the x-axis, Bzl-
~4 respectively, which achieves the aforementioned condi-
tional removal of the image translation. In Fiq. 4(a),
mirrors 18 and 19 of periscope 17 are shown rotated at an
angle ~Zl which removes the ima~e translation and focuses the
image onto print material 20 along the optical path A ~hown
in solid line portion. The original optical axis path length
d at az = 0, ~z - 0 is shown in dotted line portion. The
means for rotating the periRcope 17 are not shown, but it i
2727g-560/9910
~3~
to be understood any conventional mean~, such as controllable
gear motors which are known per se in the art, for rotating a
mirror about an axis will satisfy the rotation re~uirement~
of the periscope 17 in accordance with the present invention.
Similarly not shown are known means for mounting the fixed
lens and displacing the film in a timed relationship.
With reference to Figs. l~c), 4(b) and 5, further
explanation of the image translation described above will be
given.
The printer optical axis path length d along each
exposure angle z is given by the relationship
d = S + S' + h (1)
where S represents the object distance from film plane ll to
the first principal plane ~ of the lens 15~ S' represents the
image distance from the second principal plane ~' of the lens
15 to print plane 21, and h represents the distance between
the principal planeq H and H' of lens 15. If the magni-
~ication of the lens is given by
m = S' (2),
by utilizing the simple lens formula ~ = lS ~ ls,and
substituting into equation (1), the optical path length d is
given by the equation~
d = f ~2 + m + lm) ~ h (3).
~5 When periscope 17 is introduced and rotated about the x-axis
to remove the aforementioned image translation, thi~ optical
path length will change by a small amount Qd, as shown in
Fig. 4(a).
Each of the periscope angle~, Bzl-Bz4~ produces a
corresponding small change ~d in,path length along the
27279-560/9910
~304~
optical axis. ~otat-on of the periscope about the x-axis
causes a shortening of the optical axis path length by a
distance ~d = C(1-cosB), where C represents the periscope
length along the x-axis. Path length correction is achieved
S by additionally rotating the periscope about the y-axis. The
rotational settin~ about the y-axis necessary to correct the
path length distortion created by the respective periscope
angles Bzl-~z4 is termed the corrective tilt angle and is
~abeled ~Zl-~Z4 Since the original path length along the
optical axis is shortened by a distance ~d = C(l-c05~ as the
periscope is rotated through the angle Bzl, the corrective
tilt angle ~ is chosen to add this correotive factor back
into the optical path length and the periscope is simul-
taneously rotated through the angle ~Zl to preserve the
optical axis path length d, as shown in FigO 4(b).
Each of the above-mentioned parameters ~, B, ~ and
~d are interrelated, and developed for each of the angular
exposure zones Zl-Z4 according to the following three design
equations:
sin B = f tlc+_m) tan ~ (4)
t = 2 tan 1 (cos B) ~5)
~d = C (l-cos ~) ~6)
~here B = periscope angle, = exposure angle, f = lens focal
length, m = magnification, C = periscope length, ~ = correc-
tive tilt angle, and ~d = optical path length correction.
The detailed description of the preferred embodi-
ment of the invention having been set forth herein Eor the
purpose of explaining the principles thereof, it is known
that there may be modification, variation or change in the
27279-560/9910
~ 3 ~ 6 ~ ~
invention without departing from the proper scope of the
invention and the claims thereto.
--10--
