Language selection

Search

Patent 1305421 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1305421
(21) Application Number: 566974
(54) English Title: MEDICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING INDOLONE DERIVATIVES
(54) French Title: COMPOSITION MEDICALE CONTENANT DES DERIVES DE L'INDOLONE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 167/240
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61K 31/40 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • OWEN, DAVID ANDREW ARLWYDD (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • SMITH KLINE & FRENCH LABORATORIES LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1992-07-21
(22) Filed Date: 1988-05-17
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
8712073 United Kingdom 1987-05-21

Abstracts

English Abstract






ABSTRACT


Medicament

Compounds of structure (I)


Image
in which each group R is hydrogen or C1-4alkyl; R1 and
R2 are hydrogen or C1-4alkyl; R3 is hydrogen or
hydroxy; and n is 1 to 3. or a pharmaceutically acceptable
salt thereof, for use in the preparation of a medicament
for the treatment of Parkinsons Disease.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


11943
- 14 -
Claims.

1. A compound of structure (I)

Image
in which

each group R is hydrogen or C1-4alkyl;
R1 and R2 are hydrogen or C1-4alkyl;
R3 is hydrogen or hydroxy; and
n is 1 to 3;


or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, for use
in the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of
Parkinsons Disease.


2. 4-(2-di-n-propylaminoethyl)-2-(3H)-indolone
for use in the preparation of a medicament for the
treatment of Parkinsons Disease.


3. 4-(2-di-n-propylaminoethyl)-2-(3H)-indolone
hydrochloride for use in the preparation of a medicament
for the treatment of Parkinsons Disease.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


11943
-- 1 --
~edicament

The present invention relates to ~ertain indolone
derivatives for use in the treatmen~ of disorders of the
central nervous system of mammals, in particular in the
treatment of Parkinsons Disease.

Parkinsons Disease is a disturbance of voluntary
movement in which muscles become stiff and sluggish,
movement becomes clumsy and difficult and uncontcollable
~hythmic twitching of groups of muscles produce~
characteristic shaking or tremor. The condition is
belie~ed to be caused by a degeneration of pre-synaptic
dopaminergic neurones in the brain. The absence of
adequa~e release of the chemical transmitter dopamine
during neuronal activity thereby leads to the Parkinsonian
symptomatology.
:'
Currently, the most widely used treatment for
Parkin~onism is administration of L DOPA, a precur~or of
dopamine which acts indirectly by replacing the missing
dopamine. However, disadvantages are associated with
the use of L-DOPA, for example, patients often suffer from
side-efects such a~ dyskinesia and on-off effects, and it
is necessary to administer L-DOPA in conj-unction with a
peripheral dopa-decarboxylage inhibitor such as carbidopa
or benzaseride. These inhibitors prevent the peripheral
degradation of levodopa to dopa~ine, thus enabling more
drug to enter the bLain and limiting peripheral side-
e~fects. Such treatment improves quality of life forpatients but does not halt disea~e progression.
Furthermore, such treatment is a sociated with a number of
adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, abdominal
distension and psychiatric side-effects (for example, toxic
confusional states, paranoia and hallucinations).
;



'
: .

~3~S~
1194~
z
An alternative form of therapy is to administer post-
synaptic dopamine agonists, for example ergot alkaloids
such as bromocriptine - however, this approach is also
associated with side-effects. For example, patients
receiving bromocriptine o~ten experience dyskinesia
psychiatric eroblems, and in a small number of cases
experience vasopastic phenomena and angina. In addi~ion
bromocriptine also causes psychiatric side-effects such as
hallucinations.
In view of the foregoing, it is clear that there
is a continuing need for the provision of effective safe
medicaments ~or the treatment of Parkinsonism.

It has now been found that certain indolone
derivatives known in the art as pre-synaptic D2~agonists
having utility as cardiovascular agents (see EP 113964-B),
also are post-synaptic D2-agonists in the brain and hence
are expected to have utility in the treatment of
Parkinsonism.

This f inding is particularly interesting since such
compounds have previou~ly been reported as not being
capable of producing the central behavioural effects often
~een with dopamine agonists (see Gallaqher, G., Jr. et
al., J.Med.Chem. 1985, 28 1533-1536). In addition, the
compounds of the pre~en~ invention show distinct
unexpected advantages over known dopamine agonists in
having been found to have additional effects on the
~o central nervou~ system, namely, anti-depressant and
anxiolytic effects. FurtheLmore, preclinical studies
appear to indicate that the compounds show minimal
liabili~y to cause dyskine6ia. In particular the anti-
depressant and anxiolytic effects of the compounds of the
present invention are perceived to be advantageous as
patients receiving current therapies often also need to

llg43
-- 3 --
take separate anti-depressant medication. The presence of
such qualities in a single compound may therefore ~educe
the need fo~ such separate therapy.

The present invention therefore provides compounds of
structure (I)

(C~ ) NR
~Z
R3 H

in which

each group R is hydrogen or Cl 4alkyl;
R and R are each hydrogen or Cl 4alkyl;
R is hyd~ogen or hydroxy; and
n i8 1 to 3;
:
and pharmaceutically acceptable ~alts thereo~ for use in
the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of
~ Parkinson6 Di~ea~e.
:: 25
Preferably, both groups R are Cl 4alkyl in
particular propyl and Rl and R2 are both hydrogen.
.
Suitably R3 is hydroxy; preferably R3 is
hydrogen.

In particular the present invention relate6 to the
u6e of the compound in which both groups R are propyl,
Rl, R2 and R are hydrogen and n i~ 2 namely,
~: 35 4-(2-di-n-propyIaminoethyl)-2-(3H)-indolone



:~ :

. . "~,, ~ . , ,
~:
:

~3~5~
11943
-- 4
or a pha~maceutically acceptable salt thereof in the
treatment of Parkinsonism.

Suitable salts will be apparent to those skilled in
s the art and include, for e~ample acid addition salts,
preferably the hydrochloride.

The compounds of structure (I) and their
pharmaceutically acceptable salts can be prepaeed by the
methods described in EP 113964-B.

In therapeutic use for the treatment of Parkinsonism,
the compounds a~e incorporated into ~tandard pharmaceutical
compositions. They can be administered orally,
parenterally, rectally or transdermally.

The compounds of structure (I) and their
pharmaceutically acceptable salts which are active when
given orally can be formulated as liquids, for example
; 20 syrups, suspensions or emulsions, tablets, capsules and
lozenges.

A liquid formulation will generally consist of a
suspen6ion or solution of the compound or pharmaceutically
acceptable salt in a suitable liquid carrier(s) for
example, ethanol, glycerine, non-aqueous solvent, for
example ~olyethylene glycol, oils, or water with a
6uspending agent, preservative, flavouring OL colouring
agent.
A composition in the form of a tablet can be prepared
using any suitable p~armaceutical carrierts) routinely
used for praparing solid formulations. Examples of such
carriers include magnesium stearate, ~tarch, lactose,
sucrose and cellulose.

~3~2~
11943
-- 5 --
A composition in the form of a capsule can be prepared
using routine encapsulation procedures. For example,
pellets containing the active ingredient can be prepared
using standard carriers and then filled into a hard gelatin
capsule: alternatively, a dispersion or suspension can be
prepared using any suitable pharmaceutical carrier(s), for
example aqueous gums, celluloses, silicates or oils and the
dispersion or sus~ension then filled into a soft gelatin
capsule.

The compounds of structure (I) and their
pharmaceutically acceptable salts which are active when
administered parenterally (i.e. by injection or infusion)
lS can be formulated as solutions or suspensions.

A composition for paLenteral administration will
generally consist of a solution or suspension of the active
ingredient in a sterile aqueous carrier or parenterally
acceptable oil, for example polyethylene glycol, polyvinyl
pyrrolidone, lecithin, arachis oil or sesame oil.
AlteLnatively, the solution can be lyophilised and then
reconstituted with a suitable solvent just prior to
administration.
A ty~ical suppository composition comprises a
compound of formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable
salt thereof which is active when administered in this
way, with a binding and/or lubricating agent such as
polymeric glycols, gelatin~ or cocoa butter or other low
melting vegetable or synthetic waxes or fats.

A typical transdermal formulation comprises a
conventional aqueous or non-aqueous vehicle, for example,
a cream, ointment lotion or paste or in the form of a
medicated plaster, patch or membrane.
~'



. ,

13~
llg43
-- 6
Preferably the composition is in unit dose form. Each
dosage unit for oral administration contains preferably
from l to 50 mg (and for parenteral administration
contains preferably from 0.1 to 15 mg) of a compound of
the formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
thereof calculated as the free base.

The daily dosage regimen for an adult patient may be,
for example, an oral do~e of between 1 mg and 100 mg,
preferably between l mg and 50 mg, or an intravenous,
subcutaneous, or intramuscular dose of between 0.1 mg and
50 mg, preferably between 0.1 mg and 15 mg, of the compound
of the formula (I) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt
thereof calculated as the free base, the compound being
administered l to 4 times per day. Suitably the compounds
will be administered for a period of continuous therapy.




.


: : :


`:
: , ,

3L3(~

7 11943

Bioloqical Data:

Using the compound 4-(2-di-n-propylaminoethyl~-2-
(3H)-indolone hydrochloride (Compound A, prepared
according to procedures described in European Patent
113964-B) the following tests were performed :
1. Mouse spontaneous locomotor activity using individual
cages equipped with photocells.

2. Mouse spontaneous locomotor activity using treadwheels.

3. Mouse seontaneous locomotor activity measuring
climbing frame behaviour.

4. Mea~urement of stereotyped behaviour in the mouse.

5. ~at spontaneous locomotor activity using individual
cages equi~ped with photocells: measurement of
stereotypy.
6. Measurement of hyperactivity following direct
administration into the mesolimbic nucleus accumbens
of the rat. An indicator of anti-depre~sant activity.
~;:
7. ~ffect on observed locomstor activity following direct
~ administration into the extrapyramidal caudate-putamen
; (striatum). A test for anti-Parkinsonism potential.

8. Measurement of anti-depressant activity in the mouse
uslng the 'Porsolt Test~.

; 9. Anxiolytic activity in the mouse using a black and
white test box.

; 35 10. MPTP-treated marmoset model. ~ test for anti-Parkinson
activity.
:: :
, ~ ~


~: '

~3~S4~7L
11943
-- 8
A. Effect of Com~ound A on spontaneous locomotor activitv
in mice

Compound A caused inhibition of spontaneous locomotor
activity in the mouse in each of the first three tests at
doses of 1.0 and 10.0 mg/kg i.p. Statistically significant
inhibition (P< 0.01-0.001~ wa~ measured following 10 mg/kg
in test Mo. 1 and 1.0 mg/kg in test No. 3.

Stimulation of locomotor activity, at a statistically
significant levels (P< 0.001), was seen after 100 mg/kg
Compound ~ in the photocell and treadwheel ~ests, but not
in the climbing test where the original inhibition was
reversed. This biphasic activity, also exhibited by
amphetamine and a~omorphine in these tests, is consistent
with that of a dopamine agonîst having ability to stimulate
presynaptic (autoreceptors) at low doses and post-synaptic
receptors at a high dose. (Amphetamine is a known mood
enhancer and apomorphine is a standard D2agonist of the
same pharmacological class as compound A). These tests
are considered to indicate dopamine agonist activity in
both extrapyramidal and limbic systems.

B. AbilitY of ComPound A to induce stereotyPy in rats or
mice

At doses of 1.0, 10.0 and 100 mg/kg i.p. Compound A
caused no dose dependent stereotypies in the mouse or rat
(te~ts 4 and 5). Amphetamine, at dose up to 10.0 mg/kg
i.p. and apomorphine, ~.0 mg/kg s.c., produced marked
stereotyped behaviour such as continuous biting, gnawing
and licking in both species whereas Compound A only caused
periodic sniffing.



~ ~ .

.
.

2~
11943
g
Results

In these two tests Compound A shows a diffe~ent
profile to other known dopamine agonists suggesting a more
selective mode of action.

C. Effect of ComPound A on locomotor activity in the rat

Doses of 10.0 and 100.0 mg/kg i.p. Compound A caused
statistically significant (P<O.OOl), dose-related increases
in spontaneous locomotion (test 5) which lasted, at the
higher dose, in excess of 2.5 hours. ~nhancement of
locomotor activity by amphetamine and other dopamine
agonists is difficult to measure because it is complicated
by the development of stereotypies. When injected directly
into the mesolimbic nucleus accumbens via an indwelling
cannula (test 6), Compound A (lO~g) caused a marked
(P<O.OOl) increase in spontaneous locomotion. Amphetamine,
at the same dose, was equally ef~ective, but the lower dose
of Compound A (l.Oyg) was ineffective, causing a tendency
to inhibition, especially during ~he first 10 minu~es after
dosing. Direct action of a compound to cause hyperactivity
following admini~tration into the mesolimbic nucleus
accumben~ is considered to be indicative of
anti-depres~ant activity.

I~ a separate experiment, designed to measure
stimulation of the striatum by recording asymmetry and
circling behaviour, Compound A (0.01-10.0 ~g),
apomorphine (up to 50 yg) oe amphetamine (up to 100 yg)
; were administered, unilaterally, via an indwelling cannula
into the extrapyramidal caudate-putamen (text 7).
Apomorphine and amphetamine were both inactive in this test
but Compound A caused marked contralateral asymmetry and
circling behaviouI which became statistically significant
at 1.0 and 10.0 ~g.

::

:
::

~3~
11943
-- 10 --
Conclusion
The ~esults from this test suggest an indication for
anti-Parkinson potential for this compound.

D. Anti-depressant activitY usinq the 'Porsolt Test

Compound A, at 0.1 - 10 mg/kg i/p., showed
statistically significant (P< 0.05) anti-depressant
activity in mice using the Porsolt test. a test measuring
the animals ability to keep stable in water. The activity
was similar to that of (+) amphetamine (0.625-2.5 mg/kg
i.p.) and qreater than amitriptyline ~2.4-40 mg/kg i.p.).
The known anti-Parkinson agent Bromocriptine, 0.1-1 mg/kg
i.p. caused a statistically significant reduc~ion in
swimming time at the higher dose:

Conclusion
Contrary to the effect sPen in this test with the
known anti-Parkinson agent bromocriptine, compound A was
found to exhibit statistically significant anti-depLessant
activity.

E. AnxiolYtic effect of Com~ound A

In a study to investiga~e anxiolytic activity in a
~Black and White test box (test 9), Compound A (0.1-10
mg/kg i.p.) caused a statistically significant increase in
the time spent in the white section and a correspondingly
reduced period in the black area. This behaviour was
similar to that caused by diazepam (0.125-5 mg/kg i.p.)
and is con~istent with other compounds having clinical
`; anxiolytic activity. In a similar, though se~arate,
study bromocriptine (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.) caused a
statistically significant increase in inveitigatory
; 35 activity in the black area with no change in the light
aversion:


: : ~

: .
' '
` ~ :

,

~3~i4~L
11943

Conclusion
Contrary to the effect seen in this test with the
known anti-Parkinson agent bLomocriptine, compound A was
found to exhibit statistically significant differences in
its anxiolytic effect.

F. Anti-P~arkinson activity:_ MPTP-treated marmoset model

(i) Parkinsonism-like motor deficits (hypokinesia
and bradykinesia) were induced in marmosets by the intra-
nigral infusion of l-methyl-4-phenyl-1, Z, 3, 6-tetrahydro-
pyridine (MPTP) for 13 days via an implan~ed injec~ion unit
and 06motic minipump (Test 10). Motor deficits appeared
within 3-4 days and persisted for several weeks. Drug
assessments were begun after 7-10 days of infusion.

Result~

Compound A (0.05-1.0 mg/kg s.c.) fully restored
20 normal motoc behaviourg although at 0.05 mg/kg, 1 or 2
marmosets did not re~pond:

Behav1Oural measure Control MPTP Compound A (~g/kg 5 .C . )
~veh1cle 0.01 0.05 Q.l 1.0
25 LMA (% control~100 15 26 47*(70) 93~* 103**
Y. tlme spent tn LMA 30 3 4 12*(23) 29** 28**
% t~me 1n head movements 85 23 26 36*(80) 83** 84**

LMA - Locomotor activity (movemants between perch and cage
floor).
Value~ are means ~n=4): S.E.M. <13.6%, except at 0.05
mg/kg. where 1 o 2 animals did not improve (S.E.M. up to
24.2%3. Values in parentheses are means from tho~e
animals responding.
Significant antagonism of MPTP impairment * P~0.05, **
P<O . 01.

~L3~?~
11943
- 12 -
The most marked effect of Compound A was ~he full
restoration of normal movement~ in the limbs, trunk, head
and neck. In particular, characteristic rapid ~ide to
side head movements returned, as did no~mal facial
expressions and the motor coordination for complex tasks
such as jumping and playing. Furthermore, there was no
development of tolerance during do~ing (0.1, 1.0 mg/kg
s.c.) twice daily for 7 days.

For comparative puc~oses tests were carried out with
two known anti-Parkinson agents L-DOPA and Bromocriptine.

Treatmen~ with L-DOPA (12.5 mg/kg i.p. 30 min.
pretreatment) after ben~erazide (12.5 mg/kg s.c. 90 min.
pretreatment) also restored MPTP-induced motor defici~s,
but at these relatively high doses appeared to be la6s
effective than 0.1 mg/kg s.c. Compound A. Treatment with
Bromocriptine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) had little effect.

Conclugion
The results of thi~ specific test confirm the
potential o~ compound A for use as an anti-Parkinson agent.

(ii) Compound A was administered orally to ~PTP
trsated marmosets at doses of 0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg.

Partial reversal of the following MPTP-induced motor
deficit6 were recorded following each dose: percen~ags
time spent in locomotor activity, reduction in 6peed of
head movemen~, reduction in ~peed of locomo~or activity,
lack of intere~t in surroundings, lack of facial
expression, head elevation and percentage time ~pent in
head movement. The respon~e for the lowest do6e (0.1
mg/kg, n=2) was 6ubmaximal and the highest dose (1.0
mg/kg, n=3) was sueramaximal. No emesis occurred at ~he
two lower dose~.





~3~
11943
- 13 _
Conclus_on

The results of this specific test confirm the
potential of compound A for use as an anti-Parkinson agent.




G. Receptor bindinq studies

Receptor binding studies, using rat brain. indicated
'that both bromocriptine and pergolide showed affinity for
5HTl and 5HT2 recep~ors and pergolide also bound to
dopamine Dl receptors. Compound A showed no affinity
for any of these receptor subtypes.

Conclusion
These studies indicate that Compound A is more
selective in its binding to receptors ~han the other
D2-agonists (bromocriptine and pergolide) studied.




'
:


: ~

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1992-07-21
(22) Filed 1988-05-17
(45) Issued 1992-07-21
Expired 2009-07-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1988-05-17
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1988-09-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1994-07-21 $100.00 1994-06-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1995-07-21 $100.00 1995-06-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1996-07-22 $100.00 1996-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1997-07-21 $150.00 1997-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 6 1998-07-21 $150.00 1998-06-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 7 1999-07-21 $150.00 1999-06-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 8 2000-07-21 $150.00 2000-06-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 9 2001-07-23 $150.00 2001-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 10 2002-07-22 $200.00 2002-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 11 2003-07-21 $200.00 2003-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 12 2004-07-21 $250.00 2004-06-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 13 2005-07-21 $250.00 2005-06-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 14 2006-07-21 $250.00 2006-06-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 15 2007-07-23 $450.00 2007-06-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 16 2008-07-21 $450.00 2008-06-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SMITH KLINE & FRENCH LABORATORIES LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
OWEN, DAVID ANDREW ARLWYDD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1993-11-02 1 19
Claims 1993-11-02 1 23
Abstract 1993-11-02 1 21
Cover Page 1993-11-02 1 18
Description 1993-11-02 13 482
Representative Drawing 2000-07-28 1 2
Fees 1996-06-20 1 73
Fees 1995-06-21 1 63
Fees 1994-06-17 1 76