Language selection

Search

Patent 1315512 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1315512
(21) Application Number: 588348
(54) English Title: SYSTEM FOR STABILIZING DIMENSIONAL PROPERTIES OF CURED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
(54) French Title: APPAREIL ET METHODE PERMETTANT D'OBTENIR LA STABILITE DIMENSIONNELLE DES OUVRAGES COMPOSITES TRAITES
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 18/1170
  • 341/108.1
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01N 29/00 (2006.01)
  • G01N 33/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DELACY, THOMAS J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: FETHERSTONHAUGH & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-04-06
(22) Filed Date: 1989-01-16
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract



SYSTEM FOR STABILIZING DIMENSIONAL PROPERTIES
OF CURED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Method and apparatus are disclosed for
inducing dimensional stability in cured composite
structures using acoustic emission analysis to identify
the appropriate level and extent of coincident thermal
conditioning. Temperature of the composite structure
is lowered at a bounded rate to a minimum temperature
typical of the intended operating environment. Passive
stress wave acoustic emissions of the composite are
analyzed to generate a signature of stress relaxation
events over time. When the rate of stress relaxation
events decreases below a predetermined percentage of
the maximum rate, and remains below that level for a
period of time sufficient to predict operational
stability, thermal conditioning is terminated.



9443-11/860120/9443


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method for post cured treatment of a previously
cured heterogeneous anisitropic resin-based organic fiber
composite structure for improving dimensional stability
in said cured composite structure, said cured composite
structure to be used in an operating environment
characterized by thermal stress, said method comprising
the steps of:
imposing on said composite structure a controllable
thermal load representative of said operating
environment;
monitoring acoustic signals from said structure
while imposing said controllable thermal load;
extracting from said acoustic signals a signature
for said structure, said signature comprising a rate of
stress relaxation events per unit time overtime;
comparing said signature with a signature template
while imposing said controllable thermal load, said
signature template being a record of at least selected
benchmarks of rates of stress relaxation events, said
signature template being derived from an observed
response of an equivalent dimensionally stabilized
structure exposed to said thermal load; and
removing said thermal load from said composite
structure when the differences between said extracted
signature and said selected benchmarks of said signature
template are minimized, thereby assuring the relaxation
of internal residual stresses in said composite structure
prior to its use in said operating environment.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said imposing step
comprises exposing said composite structure to a constant
temperature.

16
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said
imposing step comprises:
increasing the temperature of said composite
structure from ambient temperature to an upper limit to
drive off volatiles;
decreasing the temperature of said composite
at a bounded rate from said upper limit to a lower
limit approximately equal to the minimum temperature of
said operating environment; and
maintaining the temperature of said composite
at said lower limit.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein said
decreasing step comprises decreasing said temperature
at a rate of less than -10°C/minute.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said
extracting step comprises the steps of:
conditioning said acoustic signals to remove
unwanted frequency components;
measuring at least a first interdependent
parameter and a second interdependent parameter, said
first and second parameters being characteristic of
said conditioned acoustic signals; and
detecting stress relaxation events by
comparing an interrelationship of said first and second
interdependent parameters to a predetermined value
characteristic of stress relaxation mechanisms in said
composite structure.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said
detecting step comprises:
comparing the quotient of said first and
second interdependent parameters to a predetermined
value indicative of stress relaxation events in said
composite structure.

17
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said
extracted signature has for each time value a maximum
rate of stress relaxation events and a current rate of
stress relaxation events and wherein said benchmarks
comprise a decrease of said current rate of stress
relaxation events to below a reference level, said
reference level being a predetermined percentage of
said maximum rate of stress relaxation events.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said
predetermined percentage is approximately ten percent.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein said
benchmarks further comprise a time duration for which
said rate of stress relaxation events must remain below
said reference level before performing said removing
step.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein said
extracted signature has a time of onset of stress
relaxation events and said time duration is a multiple
of a dwell period, said dwell period being measured
from the time of onset of stress relaxation events to
the time at which said rate of stress relaxation events
decreases to below said reference level.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein said
multiple is approximately two.

12. An apparatus for post cure treatment of
a previously cured heterogeneous anisitropic
resin-based organic fiber composite structure for
improving dimensional stability in said cured composite
structure, said cured composite structure to be used in

18
an operating environment characterized by thermal stress,
said apparatus comprising;
means for imposing on said composite structure a
controllable thermal load representative of said
operating environment;
sensor means coupled to said composite structure for
monitoring acoustic signals from said structure while
imposing said thermal load;
analyzer means coupled to said sensor means for
extracting from said acoustic signals a signature for
said structure, said signature comprising a rate of
stress relaxation events per unit time overtime;
means coupled to said analyzer means for comparing
said signature with a signature template, while imposing
said controllable thermal load, said signature template
being a record of at least selected benchmarks of rates
of stress relaxation events, said signature template
being derived from an observed response of an equivalent
structure exposed to said thermal load; and
means coupled to said comparing means for removing
said thermal load from said composite structure in
response to a signal from said comparing means, said
comparing means being operative to transmit a signal to
said removing means when the differences between said
extracted signature and said selected benchmarks are
minimized,
thereby assuring the relaxation of internal residual
stresses in said composite structure.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said extracted
signature has for each time value a current rate of
stress relaxation events, a maximum rate of stress
relaxation events, and a time of onset of stress
relaxation events, and said comparing means are operative
to transmit said signal to said removing

19
means when said current rate of stress relaxation
events decrease to below a reference level, and remains
below said reference level for a time duration equal to
a multiple of a dwell period, said dwell period being
measured from said time of onset of stress relaxation
events to the time at which said current rate of stress
relaxation events decreases to below a reference level,
said reference level being a predetermined percentage
of said maximum rate of stress relaxation events.

14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said
imposing means comprises
means for increasing the temperature of said
composite structure to an upper limit;
means for decreasing the temperature of said
composite structure at a constant rate from said upper
limit to a lower limit approximately equal to the
minimum temperature of said operating environment: and
means for maintaining the temperature of said
composite at said lower limit.

15. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said
analyzer means comprise
means for conditioning said acoustic signals
to remove unwanted frequency components;
means for measuring at least a first
interdependent parameter and a second interdependent
parameter characteristic of said conditioned acoustic
signals: and
means for detecting stress relaxation events
by comparing an interrelationship of said first and
second interdependent parameters to a predetermined
value characteristic of stress relaxation mechanisms in
said structure.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1 3 1 ~ ~ 1 2 86-1/9~43 ll


SYSTEM FOR STABILIZING DIMENSIONAL PROPERTIES
OF CURED COMPOST~E STRUCTURES

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Inventicn
This invention relates to stabilizing the
properties of advanced composite materials such as
epoxy resin organic carbon fiber composites. In
particular, the invention relates to a method and
apparatus for inducing potential dimensional stability
in cured composite structures by usinq passive stress
wave acoustic emission analysis to determine the
appropriate level and extent of coincident thermal
conditioning.
Advanced composite materials, primarily
graphite and aramid fiber reinforced epoxy resin
materials, are attractive to a number of applications
due to their high specific stiffness, high strength,
and low coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE). Among
the applications are antennas and microwave components
for satellites and other spacecraft. These
applications impose stringent demands on dimensional
stability over a broad range of operating temperatures
and stress conditions. However, such composite
materials are heterogeneous as well as anisotropic.
Consequently, thermal treatment, including thermal
loading during and subsequent to the formation of the
; solid state of the material, induces internal residual
stresses. These residual stresses are subject to
relaxation with time, which results in dimensional
- modificationt the extent of which may be unacceptable
in certain critical applications, such as spacecraft
antenna systems. Therefore, great interest exists in
techniques for inducing controlled stress relaxation in
composite structures and for verifying consequent
dimensional stability.



:, .......... .

131~12


2. Description of the Prior Art
The following patents were uncovered in a
search of the public records of the U. S. Patent and
Trademark Office respecting the sub~ect invention:

INVENTOR U.S. PATENT NO.
Bristoll et al. 3,934,451
Keledy et al. 3,713,127
Vahaviolos 3,924,456
Scott et al. ` 4,089,224
Bartoli et al. 4,126,033
Rosencwaig 4,255,971
Fukuda et al. 4,353,255
Imam et al 4,380,172
~uate 4,430,897
Rosencwaig 4,484,820

Keledy et al, Vahaviolos, Scott et al, and
Fukuda et al disclose acoustic emission monitoring
systems which are principally used to monitor crack
formation and growth in a structure. There is no
disclosure in these patents of conditioning the
structure to relieve residual stress.
Bristoll et al. discloses a method of
detecting imperfections in a lining of foamed material
by first cooling the surface of the lining and then
observing the lining for imperfections in the cooled
state. There is no disclosure of acoustic emission
monitoring or of inducing stress relief to stabilize
dimensional properties.
; Imam et al. discloses methods for detecting
incipient cracks in a turbine rotor in which a
signature analysis is used for comparison of vibration
patterns after perturbation to normal vibration
patterns. There is no suggestion of any mechanism for
; controlling stress-related-characteristics.

131~512


Bartoli discloses a method for determining
the thermal conductances of binding layers of detectors
in infrared detector arrays.
Rosencwaig '820, Quate and Rosencwaig, '971
relate to acoustic and thermoacoustic microscopy.
Additionally, U.S. Patent No. 4,494,408 was
issued January 22, 1985 to the inventor of the present
invention and assigned to the same assignee. That
patent discloses method and apparatus for monitoring
and controlling potential residual stress relief
mechanisms in composite materials by acoustic emission
signature analysis during the cure cycle. The
invention described in the present application is
distinguished in that it provides extended teachings
concerning the use of post-cure constant temperature
conditioning to stabilize dimensional properties of
composite materials.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, a method and
apparatus are provided for stabilizing dimensional
properties of advanced composite materials, and
particularly for predicting dimensional stability of
cured composite structures using acoustic emission
analysis while actively stabilizing dimensional
properties by controlled thermal conditioning. The
invention is based on a discovery that thermal
conditioning at a constant temperature may bias the
mechanisms of stress relief to induce dimensional
stability in composite structures. Furthermore, by
analyzing selected interdependent parameters manifest
as features of a time-dependent function (herein
interdependent waveform features) of the acoustic
emissions, it is possible to detect the presence of
specific stress relaxation mechanisms in the composite
and to thereby generate a signature of stress
relaxation events with respect to time. (Events



.

~ 3 ~ ~ 3 1~

correspond to acoustic reports associated with
mechanical stress waves generated upon the breaking of
bonds in the subject material. Events are generally
identified by the detection of a transient sound having
an amplitude above a predetermined threshold and
substantially discriminated from sources of external
and known noise.) This signature may then be compared
against selected criteria to identify a state of
stress/strain equilibrium, and corresponding
dimensional stability, of the composite.
According to a specific embodiment of the
invention, sensor means, such as a passive transducer,
sensitive to acoustic signals generated by relaxation
of stress mechanisms within the subject composite
structure, are coupled to the composite and a
controlled thermal load is placed on the subject
structure, thereby ramping the temperature at a
constant rate to a low limit. Analyzer means receive
the signals from the sensor means after conditioning
(filtering and thresholding) and digitizing of the
signal. The analyzer means analyze the interdependent
waveform features, such as one or more ratios of
parameters, and compare them to empirically derived
data to recognize specific stress relaxation events.
When the occurrence rate of such events drops below a
level characteristic of dimensional stability, and
remains below that level for a specific duration,
controller means terminate the thermal conditioning
period.
One of the purposes of the invention is to
provide noninvasive, in situ means for inducing the
relaxation of internal residual stresses (herein stress
relaxation response) in advanced composite structures.
Another purpose of the invention is to
provide noninvasive, in situ means for recognizing
acoustic signals indicative of stress relaxation events
in advanced composites.


: ' .

131~ ~ 12


Another purpose of the invention is to
provide constant temperature conditioning in lieu of
conventional cyclic temperature conditioning to
dissipate induced residual stresses naturally, i.e. via
redistribution networking, without degrading mechanical
or thermal properties.
Another purpose of the invention is to use
the distributed properties response (viscoelastic
signature response) of the composite to qualify like
properties for quality assurance.
Another purpose of the invention is to
provide means for confirming dimensional stability of a
composite subject to post-cure thermal condition.
These and other purposes of the invention
will be apparent by reference to the following detailed
description taken in connection with the accompanying
drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an apparatus for
monitoring and controlling the post-cure thermal
conditioning of advanced composite structures.
Fig. lA is a schematic diagram showing a
temperature control means of Fig. 1.
Fig. 2 is a flow diagram of a method for
analyzing acoustic emissions from a composite structure
to recognize acoustic signals indicative of stress
relaxation events.
Fig. 3 is a representative signature of
stress relaxation events over time for a composite
structure undergoing thermal conditioning.
Fig. 4 s representative of an actual data
plot of a stable composite element showing stress
relaxation events per unit time.
Fig. 5 is a representation of an actual data
plot of a "quasi"-stable composite element showing
stress relaxation events per unit time.



DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EM~ODIMENT
Fig. 1 illustrates a specific embodiment of a
system 10 for stabilizina the dimensional properties of
cured composite structures. The structures, as, .or
example, a specimen 30, are typically formed of
graphite fiber reinforced epoxy resin materials,
hereinafter referred to as composites, which may be in
the form of a tubular element, laminate sheet or other
shaped form. The thermal conditioning system 10
comprises a digital controller 12, timing means 14,
terminal means 16, printer means 18, recorder means 20,
analog-to-digital signal converter means 22, analyzer
means 24, temperature control means 26, and a
conditioning chamber 28. Specimen 30 of the composite
is placed in the conditioning chamber 28 and sensor
means 32 are coupled to the specimen 30. Noninvasive
coupling of sensor means 32 may be accomplished using a
medium having a high viscosity index, such as
anti-seizing compound, which will retain its
consistency during the temperature excursion applied to
the specimen 30. Low thermal expansion tape, such as
Kapton tape, may be used to attach the sensor means 32
to the specimen 30. The sensor means 32 should be
thermally conditioned prior to attachment to the
specimen 30.
The sensor means 32 may comprise a
piezo-electric transducer either having a flat
(broadband) response or having a suitable resonant
response, that is, responsive to acoustic stress waves
generated within the specimen between approximately 150
~ kHz and 2 ~Hz freauency. The electrical output of the
; sensor means 32 is coupled to an amplifier 34, the
output of which is coupled to a band-pass filter 36.
The output of the filter 36 is coupled into signal
converter means 22. Signal converter means 22 receives
analog input signals at a sample-and-hold circuit 38,
the output of which is coupled into an

*Trademark

:" , . .

~` 1315512




analog-to-digital converter 40. The sample-and-hold
circuit 38 and the analog-to-digital converter 40 are
clocked by timing means 14 via clock~ line 15. The
outputs of the signal converter means 22 are coupled
into analyzer means 24 via lines 23. Analyzer means 24
may be a programmable 8 bit microprocessor with memory
means, or may be other suitable means for analyzing the
incoming digital signal. Optional thermocouples 42 mav
be thermally attached to the specimen 30 and coupled
via signal lines 43 into analyzer means 24 so that the
analyzer means 24 may optionally receive both acoustic
and thermal input signals direct~y from the specimen
30. Additionally, the analyzer means 24 may receiv~
command input and timing input signals from, for
example, the digital controller 12.
In general, temperature of the specimen 30
need not be closely correlated with the acoustic
signals of specimen 30 when it is subjected to constant
temperature loading, as described below for this
embodiment. For simplicity, temperature of the ambient
environment rather than actual surface temperature of
the specimen may be monitored, if constant temperature
loading is employed. There are various means for
conveying ambient temperature information from the
conditioning chamber 28. In the example shown in Fig.
1, ambient temperature signals are conveyed by a line
44 to external parameter input means 45, digitized and
conveyed to digital controller 12 via digital input
signal bus 47 as a part of the so-called external
parameter inputs.
Accepted acoustic signals from analyzer means
24 are coupled into the digital controller 12. The
digital controller 12 also receives inputs from timing
means 14 via line 15' and from external parameter input
means 45 via bus 47, which provides such external
parameters as the ambient temperature inside the
conditioning chamber, as discussed above.

- `~` 131~12




Referring to Fig. lA, the digital controller
12 cooperates with the temperature control means 26 via
lines 49 and 49'. The digital controller 12 may convey
simple on-off signals to temperature control means 26
to alternately regulate heat input and withdrawal from
the conditioning chamber 28. The temperature control
means 26 may take the form of a first relay 50 and a
second relay 52 for switching a power source 55 to a
heater (not shown) in the conditioning chamber 28 via
line 51 or to a cooler (not shown) in the conditionina
chamber 28 via line 53. Line 49 may control relay 50
and line 49' may control relay 52.
Returning to Fig. 1, the digital controller
12 may be bidirectionally coupled to both analyzer
means 24 and terminal means 16. The terminal means 16
is for operator interface and for communication to the
printing means 18 and recording means 20. In one
embodiment the digital controller 12 may therefore be a
simple data acquisition and signal processing device to
provide controlled temperature regulation, analogous to
a thermostat. Alternatively, the digital controller 12
and temperature control means 26 may be in combination
a commercially available controller such~as the Sym-Com
No. 3 temperature controller and Sym-Com 5 digital rate
programmer by Sym-Tek company of Santa Clara,
California. One of the features of these commercial
apparatuses is the ability to positively control
temperature ramp rate during the initial application of
a thermal load.
The invention operates as follows: following
attachment of the sensor means 32 to the cured
composite specimen 30, the temperature inside the
conditioning chamber 28 is first raised, under control
of temperature control 26 via line 51, to a level
sufficient to drive off volatiles such as moisture
which may be absorbed or otherwise entxapped by the
specimen 30. The temperature in the conditioning

*Trademarks
, . . ., ;

,

~` 131~2

chamber 28 is then lowered using suitable coolinq
means, such as, for example a dry nitrogen gas
injection system (not shown) under control of
temperature control 26 via line 53. The temperature
normally is lowered according to a bounded ramp rate
under control of digital controller 12. The ramp rate
should be sufficiently slow to inhibit stress damage
which might otherwise result if a temperature ramp rate
is applied which is extreme in comparison to the
maximum contemplated temperature ramp rate for the
contemplated operating environment. The temperature is
dropped to a level approximating the low temperature
limit to which the specimen will be exposed in actual
application and held at that level. For most
applications of thermal conditioning of composite
structures for use in spacecraft, the temperature ramp
rate generally should not exceed about -10C/minute,
and is pre~erably between approximately -1C/minute and
-5C/minute; the low temperature limit will generally
be in the range -40C to -100C, with a typical extreme
temperature for a component which is protected in its
contemplated operating environment at about -50C.
The acoustic signals from the sensor means 32
are amplified by the amplifier 34 and conditioned by
band-pass filter 36 to remove spurious signals, such
as, for example, signals from mechanical noise having a
frequency below about 100 kHz. The resulting signals
are digitized by signal converter means 22 and sent on
to the analyzer 24 for analysis. Acoustic signals
desired to be monitored from the specimen 30, called
accountable signals, i.e., those signals representative
of stress relief mechanisms occurring in the specimen
30 in response to the controlled thermal load, are
recognized by the analyzer 24 and sent to the
controller 12. A signature of the rate of stress
relaxation events per unit time versus elapsed
conditioning time is extracted from the accountable

~ 3 ~

signals, where stress relaxation events are defined as
acoustic reports of the breaking of atomic and/or
molecular konds. The signature of the structure
comprises at least indicia at selected times of the
rate stress relaxation events per unit time. The
extracted signature is compared with selected criteria
from a predefined signature template (and optionally
preprogrammed limits) to determine whether the indicia
satisfy the selected criteria and thus the course and
need for continued conditioning. The predefined
signature template is derived from an observed response
of an eauivalent composite structure when exposed to an
analogous thermal load. Analyzer means 24 and
controller means 12 act together to continuously
analyze the signals from sensor 32 to determine the
point in time where stress/strain equilibrium is
reached. Thereafter the thermal load may be removed.
In general, temperature control means 26 is
controlled by the digital controller 12 for applying
heating and cooling for sustained conditioning of the
specimen 30, or for terminating the conditioning period
in response to the analyzed acoustic signal. Terminal
16 provides means for memory access and programming of
analyzer 24 to facilitate on-line diagnostics to study
various composite forms, and to initiate changes, such
as sampling interval, signal conditioning, and display
options. An operator may manually override the
controller means 12 to alter the conditioning
parameters (via temperature control means 26) according
to the analyzed response of the sensor means 32, as
observed through printer means 18 and recorder means
20. Timing means 14 provide a clock for initiation and
coordination of the interdependent functions for data
sampling, analysis, and routing of signals.
The recognition of accountable acoustic
signals from the sensor 32 will be understood with
reference to Fig. 2. The signal from the sensor 32 is



-, . '
.' ' .. ' :

i ~31~12
il
conditioned (60~ by the band-pass filter 36, and those
components which do not reach a preselected minimum
voltage threshold are rejected (62). Specific
interdependent parameters, such as event duration,
ringdown count, and/or peak amplitude are then measured
(65,66~. ~wo or more of these interdependent
parameters are then interrelated (68) and compared (70)
to empirically derived data correlating to accountable
stress relaxation mechanisms. In the preferred
embodiment, the interdependent waveform features
derived from the parameters are frequency dependent and
consist of a quotient derivation equal to the number of
threshold crossings (ringdown count) of the signal,
divided by event duration (68~. Event duration is
determined by the elapsed period from the time of the
first signal threshold crossing to the last signal
threshold crossing, corresponding to the energy of the
mechanical wave exciting the attached piezo-electric
transducer and its dependent signal decay. Other
interdependent waveform features, such as the peak
amplitude of the signal divided by the ringdown count,
or the energy of the signal divided by the ringdown
count, may be substituted within the scope of the
invention.
The interdependent waveform features may be
used to identify specific stress relaxation mechanisms
while discounting the signal from fiber fretting and
extraneous electrical and mechanical noise sources.
The resulting signature data may be used in conjunction
with selected benchmarks from exemplary signature
templates to monitor and control thermal conditioning.
A further aspect of the invention is based on
the generation and identification of a state of induced
stress/strain equilibrium, and corresponding
dimensional stability, within the intended operational
temperature limits of any given composite form.


12
Referring to Fig. 3, a representative
signature 80 is shown, plotting stress relaxation
events per unit time vs. elapsed conditioning time.
The point of onset 82 of accountable stress relief is
seen where the slope of the curve abruptly rises
towards a peak value which is reached at point 84. The
onset stress temperature is dependent upon the
constituents of the composite and its previous thermal
history. In general, the onset stress temperature may
be presumed to be based on the previous low-temperature
history of the specimen. In the example shown in Fig.
3, the onset stress temperature for significant stress
relaxation, corresponding to point 82, is reached at
approximately -5C during the downward temperature
ramping. The measured stress relaxation response is
maximum at a point 84 at a time after the lower limit
of the imposed temperature conditioning is reached, at
approximately -50C. In this example, this low
temperature is maintained for the remainder of the
conditioning period.
In the typical case illustrated by Fig. 3,
localized stresses continue to develop in the composite
(due to redistribution phenomena) for some time after
the point of maximum stress 84. It is believed that
the viscoelastic response of the composite is
responsible for renewed stress relaxation activity, as
evidenced by the second peak 88 in the signature. A
state of "quasi-stability" is reached at point 90,
wherein the rate of stress relaxation events has fallen
below a benchmark of approximately ten percent of the
maximum sustained acoustic emission event rate response
indicated by point 84. The material is considered
suitable for its contemplated use when operational
stability is reached. Operational stability is defined
in terms of a multiple of the elapsed time required to
generate a quasi-stable state, as defined above. In
the example illustrated by Fig. 3, thermal conditioning




,

1 3 ~ L 2
13
continues for an additional time period of at least two
times (2T) the duration of the dwell period (T)
required to achieve quasi-stability. The dwell period
T commences at the onset (point 82~ of accountable
stress relief. In the example shown, the rate of
acoustic emission events continues to remain below the
ten percent threshold 92, reaching a point of
operational stability as defined above after a period
3T at point 94. If the event rate increases above the
ten percent threshold 92, prior to the time represented
by point 94, conditioning continues for at least an
additional time period equal to two times the duration
from the point of onset 82 of accountable stress relief
to the last point of quasi-stability (For example,
after point l00 of Figure 5).
Fig. 4 is an example of an actual data plot
95 of a stable composite structure. Once a condition
of quasi-stability is reached, it is maintained until
operational stability is reached. Fig. 5 is an example
of an actual data plot 96 of a sample which would
require further conditioning after first reaching
quasi-stability as described above. At point 98, the
event rate rises before operational stability is
reached, thus reauiring further conditioning.
Conditioning should continue after point l00 for a
period of at least twice the dwell period (T') needed
to reach quasi-stability at point l00. In general, the
period required for conditioning varies with each
sample specimen and may range from two to more than
thirty hours, depending on the nature of and
configuration of the specimen.
By imposing a controlled thermal load on the
specimen, while detecting the initiation and arrestment
of microcracks or other stress relief mechanisms, it is
possible to bias the nature of stress relaxation and to
induce and identify a state of operational stability.
For example, in the case of graphite-epoxy composites

1 2
14
such as represented by the signature of Fig. 3, the
incremental strain energy developed as a crack is being
formed becomes greater than the stored energy beyond a
few fiber diameters of the crack sites, and is
independent of any existing crack site. Accordingly,
if the induced stress is sufficiently high, it is more
probable that new cracks will form than that old cracks
will propagate in order to stabilize the composite.
The viscoelastic behavior exhibited by the composite at
low temperatures is utilized to redistribute the
induced thermal stresses around neighboring good bonds
in a manner which minimizes the residual stresses and
the possibility of further change in the material.
The invention has now been explained with
reference to a specific embodiment. Other embodiments
and applications of the invention will be apparent to
those of ordinary skill in the art upon reference to
this application. It is therefore not intended that
this invention be limited except as indicated by the
appended claims.




:




~'

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1993-04-06
(22) Filed 1989-01-16
(45) Issued 1993-04-06
Deemed Expired 1998-04-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1989-01-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1989-12-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1989-12-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1989-12-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1991-12-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-12-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1995-04-06 $100.00 1995-03-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1996-04-08 $100.00 1996-03-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SPACE SYSTEMS/LORAL INC.
Past Owners on Record
DELACY, THOMAS J.
FORD AEROSPACE AND COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
FORD AEROSPACE CORPORATION
HARTFORD STEAM BOILER INSPECTION TECHNOLOGIES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1993-11-22 3 60
Claims 1993-11-22 5 202
Abstract 1993-11-22 1 25
Cover Page 1993-11-22 1 17
Description 1993-11-22 14 632
Representative Drawing 2002-04-18 1 11
Fees 1996-03-19 1 23
Fees 1995-03-10 1 27
Assignment 1989-01-16 8 414
Assignment 1991-06-14 4 149
Correspondence 1989-09-13 3 145
Correspondence 1989-04-26 1 24
Correspondence 1992-12-08 1 58
Correspondence 1992-12-31 1 47
Prosecution-Amendment 1992-10-28 2 55
Prosecution-Amendment 1992-07-31 2 54
Prosecution-Amendment 1992-03-31 1 82