Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
~3~7~
--1--
OPOLYMERS OF ETHYLENE OXIDE AS ANTISTATIC ADDITIVES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a new class
of antistatic additives based on solid copolymers of
ethylene oxide having a high molecular weight. When
used with plastics as an antistatic additive, the
ethylene o~ide copolymers do not significantly impair
the physical properties of the plastic. The ethylene
oxide copolymers are also stable at high processing
temperatures and do not cause blooming of the
finished product (oiliness, crazing, marblizing, and
cracking~. The present invention also relates to a
method for treating polymeric materials with ethylene
o~ide copolymers to produce antistatic materials.
2) Prior Art
The retention and amplification of charges
of static electricity on the surface of most plastics
is well known. Plastic materials have a significant
tendency to accumulate static electrical charges due
to low electrical conductivity. A sudden discharge
of static electrical charges in the form an electric
arc is a fire hazard and exposes personnel handling
the processed plastic to elec~rical shock.
Furthermore, the presence of static electrical
charges on sheets of thermoplastic film, for example,
can cause the sheets to adhere to one another thus
making their separation for further processing more
difficult. Moreover, the presence of static
electrical charges causes dust to adhere to items
packaged in a plastic bag, for e~ample, which may
negate any sales appeal.
The increasing comple~ity and sensitivity of
microelectronic devices makes the control of
electrostatic discharge (ESD) of particular concern
to the electronic industry. Only a few hundred volts
~ 3 ~
--2--
can cause damage to sensitive devices and resul~ in
disappointing manufacturing yield~, erratic errors,
transient malfunctions, erased memory, etc. The need
to control ESD requires the total assembly
environment to be constructed of partially conductive
materials. It also requires electrostatic protective
packages, tote bo~es, casings, and covers to store,
ship, protect, or support electrical devices and
equipment made from polymeric materials possessing
antistatic properties. Additionally, accumulation of
static electrical charges on electrical equipment
like computers or vacuum cleaners or on finished
~oods such as carpet can cause the electrical
equipment to fail or cause carpet to transfer
accumulated static charges to the us~r during periods
of low humidity.
To prevent static electrical charges from
accumulating during manufacturing of the plastic,
during forming of articles of manufacture, and during
the useful life of the various articles of
manufacture, it is well known to employ various types
of antistatic agents. The antistatic agents can take
the form of a coating which may be sprayed upon the
manufactured sheets of plastic or the article of
manufacture, for e~ample, but this solution is often
temporary.
Other attempts to overcome the static
charges call for incorporating an antistatic agent
into the plastic during processing in order to
provide a more "permanent~ antistatic characteristic
to the manufactured plastic, articles of manufacture
made from the plastic, etc.. However, the
incorporation of antistatic agents into the various
types of plastic~ have created other problems. For
esample, a majority of the antistatic agents cannot
withstand high temperatures and they are destroyed or
--3--
rendered useless with respect to th~ir antistatic
abilities during the hot temperature processing
required in conventional moding or fabricating steps
for forming articles of manufacture. This limits
their applications to low-melting plastics, such as
low density polyethylenes.
A majority of the antistatic agents are also
e;ther cationic or anionic. They tend to cause the
dec~radation of plastics, particularly PVC and
polyacetals, at hot processing temperatures resulting
in discoloration or loss of physical propPrties.
Other antistatic agents have significantly lower
mol~cular weights than the polymers themselves.
Generally, lower molecular weight antistatic agen~s
posse~s undesirable lubricating properties and are
difficult to incorporate into the polymer.
Incorporation of the lower molecular weight
antistatic agents into the polymers often reduce the
moldability of the plastic because the antistatic
agents bleed through to the sur~ace of the plastic
and frequently deposit a coating on the surface of
the molds, thus de~troying the surface finish on the
articles of manufacture and reduce tha dimensional
stability when esposed to heat. In severe cases, the
surface of the article of manufacture becomes quite
oily and marblized. This is called blooming.
Additionally, the lower molecular weight antistatic
agents often tend to lose their antistatic capability
due to evaporation, develop undesirable odors, and
promote cracking or crazing on the surface of the
article of manufacture.
One of the known lower molecular weight
antistatic agents is a homopolymsr or copolymer of
e~hylene oxide. ~enerally, the lower molecular
weight polymers of ethylene o~ide antistatic agents
_4_ ~ 3~
are subject to the above mentioned problems relative
to lubricity, blooming, or less effective antistatic
properties. E~emplary of the lower molecular weight
antistatic a~ents comprising a homopolymer of
ethylene o~ide are Carbowas0 by Union Carbide;
Polyglycol0 E by Dow Chemical, PluracolO E by
BASF Wyando~te, and U.S. Patents 4,274,986;
3,745,116; and 3,625,915. E~emplary of the lower
molecular weight antistatic agents comprising a block
copolymer of ethylene o~ide and propylene 02ide are:
Pluronic~ by BASF Wyandotte; Voranol~ by Dow
Chemical; U.S. Patent 3,686,120; Japanese Patents
49-23,246; 4B-66,648, and 47-8,776; and German
Patents 2,21~,21g and 2,127,654. E~emplary of lower
molecular weight antistatic agent comprising a random
copolymer of ethylene o~ide and propylene oxide are:
Uconc by Union Carbide; and U.S. Patent 3,686,120
which is directed to e~ternal surface treatment.
Prior to the present invention, conventional
thinking was that high molecular weight copolymers of
ethylene o~ide would significantly impair the
physical properties of the plastic. Moreover, prior
thinking was that a high molecular weight antistatic
agent does not have good antistatic qu~lities and
characteristics. In fact, prior ar~ indicates that a
molecular weight above about 20,000 to 25,000 is
definitely undesirable. Exemplary of such prior art
are U.S. Patents 3,686,120 and 4,274,986.
The art of use high molecular weight
ethylene o~ide homopolymers have been described in
U.K. Patent Application 2,139,~30 and Japanese Patent
60-206,856. However, high molecular weight ethylene
o~ide homopolymers are difficult to incorporate into
other polymeric materials probably due to the high
crystallinity of homopolymers. Furthermore,
1 31~7A~
--5--
homopolymers are uneffective antistatic a~ents when
incorporated into polymeric materlals at small
amounts. When larger amounts of homopolymers are
incorporated, the antistatic properties of polymeric
materials are slightly improved, but the materials
become e~tremely brittl~.
The use of high molecular weight ethylene
o~ide polymers, including copolymers, for olefin
polymer~ as a~tistatic additives has been disclos~d
in U.S. Patent 3,425,981 to Puletti and Gardner.
Poly(ethylene oxide) homopolymer i the preferr~d
antistatic agent. The patent discloses that the
antistatic agent is incorporated only into olefin
polymer compositions. The patent fails to indicate
the significant adYantages of copolymers over
homopolymers of ethylene oside. Furthermore, the
patent also fails to indicate the wide applications
of antistatic copolymers to a variety of polymeric
materials. The copolymers of ethylene o~ide of this
invention fail to show significant antistatic
improvement when applied to any olefin polymer
compositions such as polyethylene. When a copolymer
of this invention comprising 85 weight percent of
ethylene oYide and 15 weight percent of propylene
oside was incorporated at 10 weight par~s per 100
weight parts of ~olyethylene, both low density
polyethylene (Escorne0 LD ~05-49 from Esson) and
high density polyethylene (Amoco 3250~ from Amoco)
gave a surface resistivi~y great than 1016 ohm/sq,
which is classified as an insulator. According to
the teaching o U.S. Patent 3,425,~81, the copolymers
of ethylene o~ide of the present invention will be
useless as antistatic additives.
Various copolymers of ethylene o~ide having
a high molecular weight are taught by the prior art.
~ 3~
For example, German Patent 1,109,901 discloses a
copolymer of ethylene oxide and propylene oside which
is formed by contacting the monomers with a
coordination catalyst based on triethylaluminum
(TEAL). Although the German patent does not disclose
that these high molecular weight compounds can be
used as antistatic agents, it does mention that the
high molecular weight compounds can be utilized as
thickeners and as a film base.
It is an objective of the present invention
to provide an ~ntistatic agent which is a solid,
nonionic material preferabIy having a high molecular
weight (greater than 20~000), having a DSV of greater
than 0.25 as determined on a solution made up with
0.25 grams of the polymer in 100 grams of toluene
according to ASTM D2857, stable at high temperatures,
inert toward and compatible with plastics, and yet do
not cause blooming, do not develop undesirable odors,
do not significantly impair physical properties and
produces a ~permanent~ antistatic material with a
surface resistivity in the order 101 to lol3
ohms per square depending on the amount of antistat
incorporated,.
It is another objective of the present
invention to produce a wide variety of antistatic
polymeric materials incorporated in the ethylene
o~ide copolymers of this invention to minimize the
problems caused by static electrici~y withou~
impairing the physical propertie~ or stability
thereof.
It is another objective of the present
invention to provide a proc~ss for treating a wide
varie~y of polymeric materials with the ethylene
o~ide copolymers of this invention to produce
antistatic polymeric materials.
--7--
These and other objectives and advantages of
the invention will become apparent by reference to
the following description.
SUMM~RY 0~ THE INVENTIQN
The present invention concerns a solid,
nonionic, high molecular weight copolymer of ethylene
oxide employed as an antistatic agent in various
plastic compounds. In par icular, the presen~
invention concern~ the combination of a high
molecular weight copolymer of ethylene o~ide and a
polymeric material such as polyvinyl chloride (PVC),
terpolymer of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS~,
chlorinated polyvinyl-chloride (CPVC), polyamide~
such as nylon 66, for example, polyesters, and
polycarbonates.
It is surprisingly found that by adding one
or more cyclic comonomers to ethylene o~ide, thus
forming the high molecular weight copolymers of this
invention, significantly improves their antistatic
performance. Furthermore, the copolymers are easily
incorporated into polymeric material and do not
impair the physical properties of polymeric materials
significantly. Additionally, the co~olymers still
maintain thc advantages of the nonionic nature of the
homopolymers, which are stable at high processing
temperatures and do not cause the degradation o the
polymeric materials.
Since the function of antistatic additives
is believed to improve the conductivity by absorption
of small quantities of molsture at the surface of
polymeric material, it is espected ~hat the
performance of an antistatic additive should improve
as it becomes more hydrophilic. The improvement of
ant;static performance by replacing some hydrophilic
ethylene o~ide units in the homopolymers with
7 -~ ~
--8--
hydrophobic units to form copolymers of the present
invention is une~pected.
In the broadest sense, the present invention
concerns an antistatic polymeric composition having
an effective amount of at least one antistatic
additive of an ethylene o~ide copolymer having a
dilution solution viscosity of greater ~han 0.25, the
copolymer egcluding epihalohydrin and a polymeric
material. Preferably the ethylene oxide copolymer is
in the range of from about 3 to about 30% by weight;
while the polymeric material is in the range of from
about 70 to about 97% by weight.
In the broades~ sense, the present invention
also concerns a process for preparing an antistatic
composition by adding to a polymeric material an
effective amount of solid antistatic agent consisting
of an ethylene o~ide copolymer having a dilution
solution viscosity of greater than 0.25, the
copolymer e~cluding epihalohydrin; and mixing the
polymeric material and the ethylene o~ide copolymer
to produce a uniform antistatic polymeric composition.
~ES~RIPTIQN ~F THE PREFE~RED EMBODIMENTS
A solid, nonionic copolymer of ethylene
o~ide which has a high molecular weight is useful as
an antistatic agent for various elastomers and
plastics. By high molecular weight copolymer, it is
meant polymers is a solid at room temperature and
having a DSV (dilution solution viscosity) of greater
than 0.2~ as determined on a solution made up with
O.25 ~rams of the polymer in 100 grams of toluene
with capillary viscometer at ~5C according to ASTM
D2857, therein referred to as inheren~ viscosity and
preferably having a weight average molecular weight
greater than 20,000 as measured by gel permeation
chromatography, osmometry, cryoscopy, or
~3~7~a
- 9 -
ebullioscopy. Low molecular weight polymers referred
to in the present application generally is a viscous
liquid at room temperature and ha~e a weight average
molecular weight less than 20,000 and a DSV les~ than
0.25.
Copolymers of ethylene oxids with one or
more cyclic monomeræ containing up to including 25
carbon atoms per molecule may be suitable antistatic
a~ents. ~on-cy~lic functional monomers cannot be
used because they cannot be copolymerized due to
differences in functionality between cyclic and
non-cyclic monom~rs. Copolymers of ethylene o~ide
may be blocked, sraft, random, or alternating
copolymers, but pref~rably random copolymers. The
copolymers are high molecular weiqht with weight
average molecular weighs greater than 20,000 and in
the range of from about 20,000 to 5,000,000 as
measured by gel permeation chromatography, osmometry,
cryoscopy, or ebullioscopy, or with a DSV value
greater than 0.25 and in the range o~ from about 0.25
to 15Ø Preferably, the molecular weight is in the
range of from about 25,000 to about l~Q00,000, or
with a DSV value in the range of from about 0.5 to
5Ø Because of the high molecular weight,
copolymers of ethylene oxide of the present invention
are solid instead of viscous iquids. Accordingly,
the solid copolymer~ ars easily handled, easily use
with esisting equipment and are easily incorporated
into polymeric materials.
In the copolymers of the present invention,
the amount of ethylene o~ide can vary from about 5 to
95 weight parts, whereas one or more of the
comonomers used along with the ethylene oside can
vary in an amount of from about 95 to 5 weight
parts. Particularly preerred copolymers consist of
1 3 ~ ~ 7 ? ~
--10--
40 to 95 weight parts of ethylene oside with 60 to 5
weight parts of one or more comonomers all on the
basis of 100 weight parts.
The one or more comonomer~ of the present
inventio~ can be al~ylene oside containing up to 25
carbon atoms represented by the formula:
R2 ~ R4
wherein Rl, R2, R3, and R4 are selected from
the group consisting of hydrogen, saturated aliphatic
and cycloaliphatic, monoolefinic aliphatic, and
cycloaliphatic, diolefinic (conjugated and
non-conjugated) aliphatic and cycloaliphatic, and
aromatic, aralkyl, alkaryl and a like. Some or all
of the Rl, R2, R3~ and R4 can be halogen-
substituted, e~cluding epihalohydrin, and can contain
o~ygen in the form of ether linkages or an ester
linkage, or another osirane g-oup. In addition, both
Rl and R3 can represent a divalent aliphatic
hydrocarbon radical which, together with the carbon
atoms of the asirane group can form a cycloaliphatic
hydrocarbon ring containing from about 4 to about 10
carbon atoms and preferably from 5 to 6 carbon
atoms. ~inally, at least one of Rl, R2, R3,
and R4 is not hydroge~.
E~emplary of the alkylene o~ides which are
represented by the above structural formula and which
can be copolymerized with ethylene 02ides are:
1,2-epoxypropane(propylene o~ide); 1,2-epo~ybutane;
2~3-epo~ybutane~cis & trans); 1,2-epo~ypentane;
2,3-epoxypentane(cis & trans); 1,2-epo~yhe~ane;
1 3 ~ 3
2,3-epoxyhe~ane(cis & trans); 3,4-epo~yhe~ane (cis &
trans); l,~-eposyheptane; 1,2-epo~ydecane;
~ epo~ydodecane; 1,2-epo~yoctadecane;
7-ethyl-2-methyl-1,2-epoxy e~o~yundecane;
2,6,8-trimethyl-1,2-epo~ynonane; styrene o~ide.
Typical alkylene o~ide comprising cycloaliphatic
hydrocarbon ring represented by the above formula
are: cyclohexene oside; 6-o~abicyclot3,1,0]-he~ane;
7-o~ahicyclo[4,1,0] heptane;
Typical halogen-substi~uted alkylene o$ides
repressnted by th~ above formula are:
3-chloro-1,2-epo~ybutane; 3-chloro-2,3-
eposybutane; 3,3-dichloro-1,2-epo~ypropane; 3,3,~-
trichloro-1,2-eposypropane; 3-bromo-1-2-epo~ybutane;
3-fluoro-1,2-epo~ybutane; 3-iodo-1,2-epo3ybutane;
1,1-dichloro-1-fluoro-2,3-eposypropane; l-chloro-l,l-
dichloro-2,3-ep~oypropane; and 1,1,1,2-pentachloro-
3,4-epo~ybutane.
Typical alkylene 02ides with at least one
ether linkage represented by the formula are
e~empliied by: ethyl glycidyl ether; n-butyl
glycidyl ether; isobutyl glycidyl ether; t-butyl
glycidyl ether; n-he~yl glycidyl ether; 2-ethylhexyl
glycidyl ether; heptafluoroisopropyl glycidyl ether;
phenyl glycidyl ether; 4-methyl phenyl glycidyl
ether; benzyl glycidyl ether; 2-phenylethyl glycidyl
ether; 1,2-dihydropen~afluoroisopropyl glycidyl
ether; 1,2-trihydrotetrafluoroisopropyl glycidyl
ether; l,l-dihydrotetrafluoropropyl glycidyl ether;
l,l-dihydrononafluoropentyl glyci~yl ether;
~ dihydropentadecafluorooctyl glycidyl ether;
l,l-dihydropentadecafluorooctyl-a-methyl glycidyl
ether; l,l-dihydropentadecafluorooctyl-B-methyl
glycidyl ether; l,l-dihydropentadecafluoro-
octyl--ethyl glycidyl ether; 2,2,2-trifluoro ethyl
glycidyl ether.
~ J~
-12-
Typical alkylene osides with at least one
ester linkage represented by the formula are:
glycidyl acetate; glycidyl chloroacetate; glycidyl
butylrate; and glycidyl stearate; to name a few.
Typical unsaturated alkylene osides
represented by the formula are: allyl glycidyl
ether; 4-vinylcyclohe~yl glycidyl ether; a-terpinyl
glycidyl ether; cyclohe~enylmethyl glycidyl ether;
p-~inylbenzyl glycidyl ether; allylphenyl glycidyl
Pther; vinyl glycidyl ether; 3,4-epo~y-1-pentene;
4,5-epo~y-2-pentene; 1,2-epo~y-5,9-cyclododecadiene;
3,4-epo~y-1-vinylcyclohesene;
1,2-eposy-5-cyclooctene; glycidyl acrylate, glycidyl
methacrylate; glycidyl crotonate; glycidyl
4-he~enoate.
Preferable alkylene o~ides are those in
which the R2, R3, and R4 radicals are hydroqen
and the Rl radical being saturated aliphatic
containing less than two ether linkages. The most
preferable alkylene o~ide is propylene o~ide.
Other cyclic monomer~ suitable to
copolymerize with ethylene oside are cyclic ethers
with four or more member-ring containing up to 25
carbon atoms e~cept tetrahydropyran and its
derivatives. E~emplary cyclic ethers with four or
more member-ring are oxetane (1,3-eposide),
tetrahydrouran (1,5-epo~ide), and o~epane
(ld6-epo~ide) and their derivatives.
Other suitable cyclic monomers are cyclic
acetals containing up to 25 carbon atoms. Exemplary
cyclic acetal~ are triosane, diosolane,
1,3,6,9-tetrao~acycloundecane, triosepane, troxocane,
dioxepane, and their derivatives.
Other suitabl2 cyclic monomers are cyclic
esters containing up to 25 carbon atoms. Esemplary
?,",1
--13--
cyclic esters are beta-valerolactone,
epsilon-caprolactone, zeta-anantholactone,
eta-caprylactone, butyrolactone and their derivatives.
Antistatic copolymers of ethylene oxide may
be used togethar with othçr suitable kno~n antistatic
agents including long chain amines, ethers, and
esters, amides; salts of quaternary ammsnium and
sulfonic acids and alkyl, aryl or alkylaryl
sulfonates and phosphoric acidæ; alkyl, aryl, or
alkylaryl phosphates; especially their etho~ylate
derivatives; and low molecular weight polyether
glyc~ls.
Other additives may also be incorporated to
improve the performanca of the plastics, including
fillers, reinforcements, impact modifiers, heat
distortion improvers, processing aids, plasticizers,
anti-o~idants, thermal stabilizers, pigments, color
agents, ultraviolet-liqht stabilizers, flame
retardants, lubricants, slip agents, and blowing
agents.
The polymerization process for eposides in
general i~ already known in the art. Generally, one
or more epo~ide and the catalyst are contacted in the
presencc of an inert diluent. Further detailed
description of the polymerization process may be
found by reference to U.S. Patents 3,186,~58;
3,640,908; 3,557,159; and 3,135,705.
Any epo~ide polymerization catalyst can be
used for copolymerization of ethylene oxi~e to
prepare antistatic additives of th;s invention.
Epo2ide poly~erization catalysts known in the art are
anionic catalyst, catalysts based on metal osides,
alkosides, or carbonates, and coordination catalysts
bassd on an organometallic compound. Among them,
coordination catalysts are preferable. E~emplary of
-14- 1 3~ ~7 ~
coordination catalysts based on an organoaluminum
compound which has been modified with water or
alcohol or diols, and/or a chelating agent have been
described in U.S. Patents 3,135,705; 3,135,706;
3,219,591; 3,280,045; 3,058,9~3; 3,642,667; and
4,460,703; and German Patent 1,109,901.
E~emplary of coordination catalysts based on
an organoaluminum compound and a metal salt of a
beta-diketone have been described in U.S. Patents
3,396,125; 3,457,197; 3,~68,860; 3,4~4,38~; 3,~06,
~97; and 3,925,317.
Esemplary of coordination catalysts based on
an organoaluminum compound which has been modified
with a phosphoric acid have been described in U.S.
Patent 3,770,664 and 3apanese Paten~ 50-124,999.
E~emplary of coordination catalysts based on
an organomagnesium compound have been described in
U.S. Patents 3,766,901: 3,770,655; and 3,450,503.
Esemplary of coordination catalysts based
on ~-o~o-bismetallic trinuclear alkosides have been
described in U.S. Patents 3,432,445; and 3,657,149.
E~emplary anionic catalysts are potassium
hydro~ide and sodium hydroxide described in U.S.
Patent~ 2,923,690 and 1,976,678; and German Patent
616,428; and British Patent 346,550.
Esemplary catalysts based on metal osides,
alko~ides, and(or) carbonates have been described in
U.S. Patents 2,866,761 and 3,441,521; and British
Patents 793,065 and 799,955.
Copolymerization of the ethylene o~ide is
carried out u~ing a coordination catalyst system and
anhydrou3 conditions under nitrogen, preferably in an
inert diluent. The process may be conducted as a
batch or continuous process with a catalyst,
monomers, and the inert diluent added simultaneously
J~
-15-
or in increments during the polymerization, or
continuously throughout the polymerization. Ethylene
oxide and one or more comonomers are preferably added
to the reactor simultaneously or as a mixture, or
premised with the inert diluent before adding the
misture to the reactor, resulting in random
copolymers.
Any diluent that is inert under the
polymerization conditions can ~e used, such as for
e~ample: toluene; benzene; he~tane; he~ane; butane;
cyclohe~ane; diethyl ether; chlorobenzene;
methylenechloride; and ethylenedichloride.
Obviously, any mixture of such diluents can be used
and in many case preferable. Depending upon the
solubility of the copolymer formed in the diluent,
the process could be solution pol~merization or
slurry polymerization.
The polymerization process can be carried
out over a wide range of temperatures and pressures.
Usually it will be carried out in a temperatur~ range
of about -50C to about 200C, and preferably within
the range of rom about -30C to about 150C, and
most preferably from about 60C to about 120C. The
copolymerization temperature can be controlled by
jacket cooling/heating or reflu~, or both. Usually
the copolymerization process will be carried out at
superatmospheric pressure up to several hundred
pounds per square inch, or, on the other hand, at
subatmospheric or autogenous pressure. The pressure
selected depends upon the comonomer selected and is
well within the skill of the art to choose the
applicable pressure and temperature.
The ethylene o~ide copolymer an~istatic
agent is functional with a wide range of plastics
which require the antistatic agen~. The antistatic
~ 3 ~
-16-
polymeric composition of this invention comprises at
least one antistatic additive of ethylene oxide
copolymer in the range of from about 3 to about 30%
by weight and a polymeric material in the range of
from about 70 to about 97% by weight. Standard
symbols for polymeric materials are described in ASTM
D4000 and are adopted herein. ~or e~ample, the
polymeric materials may be copolymers of styrene
and/or ~-methyl styrene and acrylonitrile such as
copolymers of styrene and acrylonitrile (SA~),
terpolymers of styrene, acrylonitrile and diene
rubber (A8S); copolymers of styrene and acrylonitrile
modified with acrylate elastomers (ASA); and
copolymers of styrene and acrylonitrile modified with
ethylene propylene diene monomer ~EPDM) rubber
(ASE). Polystyrene and high impact polystyrene may
also be employed. Other polymeric materials include
polyvinyl chloride (PVC), chlorinated polyvinyl
chloride ~CPVC), nylon (a polyamide), polycarbonate
(PC), thermoplastic polyesters (TPES), including
polybutylene terephthalate (PBT~, polyethylene
terephthalate (PET), and polyether-ester block
copolymers tPETG), such as Hytel~ ~y DuPont Corp.;
polyurethane (PUR); and termoplastic polyurethane
(TPUR); polyphenylene o~ide (POP); polyacetals (POM);
copolymer of styrene and maleic anhydride (SMA) and
polymethyl methacrylate (P~MA); and mi$tures thereof.
For the purpo~e and scope of this
specification, the term o~ "polymeric material,~
which the antistatic additive of this invention
incorporated, is e~panded to include its clo~ly
analegous polymers and its derivatives, and it~
copolymers. For e~ample, by PVC it is meant
polyvinyl chloride, or its closely analegous
polymers, such as polyvinyl bromide, polyvinylidene
13~
-17-
chloride and the like or its derivative., such as
chlorinated polyvinyl chloride and the like, or vinyl
chloride copolymers or terpolymers having vinyl
chloride as the major component monomer greater than
50~ by weight. These compositions include but are
not limited to comonomers of vinyl alkanoates such as
vinyl acetate and the like, vinylidene halides such
as vinylidene chloride, alkyl esters of carbo3ylic
acids such acrylic acid, ethylacrylate, 2-ethylhe~yl
acrylate, and the like, unsaturated hy~rocarbons such
ethylene, propylene, isobutylene, and the like, allyl
compounds, such as allyl acetate, and the like. Also
for e~ample, the term ~terpolymers of styrene,
acrylonitrile and butadiene tABS)~ originally denoted
a polymer primarily constructed from acrylonitrile,
butadiene and styrene, this definition has been
expanded to include polymer resins in which these
components have been replaced in whole or in part by
~imilar analogue compounds. E~emplary of analogous
compounds of acrylonitrile ars methacrylonitrile,
ethacrylontirle, halogenated acrylonitriles, and the
like; esemplary of analogous compounds of styrene are
alpha-methyl styrene, chlorostyrene, vinyl toluene
and the like; e~emplary of analogous compounds of
butadiene is isoprene, and the like.
The ethylene o~ide copolymers of this
invention are also idea antistatic additives for
polymer blends which are the physical combination of
two or more polymeric resin systems where at least
two of the polymers are present in concentrations
greater than 5%. The principal reason ~or blending
is to improve the product cost and/or specific
property and process performance of a polymer for a
specific end-use application. Esemplary polymer
blends are ABS/PVC known commercially a~ Cycovin@
-18-
by Borg-Warner, LustranO by Monsanto, and
PolymanO by A. Schulman Inc.; ABS/PC known
commercially as Bayblend~ by Mobay and Proloy0 by
Borg-Warner; ABS/nylon commercially known as
Elemid~ by Borg-Warner; ABS/SMA known as Cadon~
by Monsanto; PVC/ASA known as Geloy~ by General
Ele~tric; PVC/acrylic known as DRE~ by Sumitomo and
Xydes~ by Rohm & Haas; PVC/urethane known as
Vythene~ by Alpha Chem & Plastics; PYC/CPE called
Hostalite~ by American ~oeschst: PVC/nitrile rubber
called Vynite~ by Alpha Chem ~ Plastics, Hycar~
by B~Goodrich, and Paracril~ by Uniroyal;
Acetal/elastomer commercially known as Celcon~ by
Celanese, Duraloy3 by Celanese, Delrin~ by
DuPont, and Ultraform~ by BASF; PBT/PET known as
Celane~ by Celanese and Yalo~ by General
Electric; PBT/elastomer called Duralos~, Gafite~
and ~aftufo by Celanese, Valos~ by General
Electric, Ultradur~ by BASF; PET/PM~A called
RopetO by Rohm & Haas; PC/PBT/elastomer known as
Xenoyo and Yalo~ by General Electric; PC/PE
known as Lesan~ by General Electric and Merlon~
by Mobay; PC/PET known as Xenoyo by General
Electric and Makroblend~ by Mobay; PC/SMA known as
Arlo~ by Arco Chemical; PC/TPU known as Te~in~
by Mobay; POP/hi~h impact PS known as Noryl~ by
General Electric and ~reve~ by Borg-Warner;
POP/polyamide known as ~oryl~ by General Electric;
SMA/high impact PS called DylarkO by Arco Chemical;
~ylon~elastomer called Ultramid~ by BASF;
~ylon/ethylene copolymer called Capron~ by Allied
ChPmical, Nycoa~ by Mylon Corp. of Amerlca,
Grilon~ by Emser Industri~s; ~ylon/EPDM
commercially known as Zytel~ by DuPont; Nylon/PE
known as Selar~ by DuPont.
-19~ 7 ~ ~
Any plastic in need of an antistatic agent
can be employed along with the copolymers of the
ethylene osides of the present invention. However,
the antistatic properties are more efective with
certain plastic~ and thus the properties are not
uniform between polymeric material3 when a con~tant
amount is employed. Additionally, the composition of
the ethylene oside comonomer also effects the
antistatic properties.
The composition of antistatic polymeric
materials of the pre~ent invention can be prepared by
mechanical mi~ing under the influence of heat and/or
pressure by a variety of methods. The actual method
chosen will depsnd to some e~tent on the nature of
~he polymeric materials and on the desired final
physical form of antistatic polymeric materials.
Antistatic additives of this invention can be
incorporated into polymeric materials together with
other compounding ingredients, such as lubricants,
plasticizer, stabilizer, fillers, impact modifier,
and processing aid, or incorporated separately before
or after the polymeric materials are compounded.
Once the antistatic agent is compounded with the
polymeric material, the antis~atic agent tends to
migrate to the surface so that it tends to
concentrate there and is less concen~rated further
remoYed one is from tha surface. A well-dispersed
composition ~de~pite the migration) is esp~cially
preerred because ~oldability and antistatic
properties are especially enhanced and physical
properties are less impaired. An ordinary miser,
roll mill, or calender, may be used to incorporate
antistatic additives of this invention into polymeric
materials to form entirely satisfactory blends at
convenient and customary operating conditions. For
-20- ~3~8~
e~ample, antistatic additives of this invention can
conveniently be incorporated into a polymeric
material by a bia~ial estruder and molded or extruded
directly into a final product, or it can be e~truded
in the form of rods which are chopped up into pellets
and used in subsequent operations. Another e~ample
is to use a Banbury*mizer to give a moldable
composition, then the compositio~ is rolled by a mill
to form a thick sheet and cubic pellets of the
composition are obtained subsequently using a screen
granulatorO Final articles of antistatic materials
can be formed by compression molding, injection
molding, blow molding, e~trusion, or calendering.
~XAMPLES
The following esamples are given to further
illustrate the present invention. The antistatic
properties of polymers were determined by surface
resistivity and static decay time. Both measurements
were carried out under controlled conditions at 25~C
with 50% relative humidity. The samples were also
conditioned at least 48 hours prior to measurement.
Surface resistivity testing is conducted in
accordance with ASTM D257 with an Electrometer (model
617) equipped with a hi~h voltage supply (model 247)
and a resistivity adapter (model 6105) all from
Keithley Instruments, Inc. The adapter comprises an
upper circular electrode and a lower circular
electrode encircled with a ringinq electrode. A
sheet sample (3.5 inches in diameter and 1/8-1/16
inch thick) was placed between the upper and lower
electrodes and a volta~e of 500 volts was applied
between the electrodes. After 60 seconds, the
current was recorded from the Electrometer and
converted into surface resisti~ity in ohms per square
using the equation derived from the dimensions of the
C ~ electrode5~
* Trade Mark
r! ~
-21-
The end use of the polymeric antistatic
material will determine the desired antistatic
properties. For e~ample, sophisticated electronic
equipment would require a higher degree to antistatic
properties than carpet or articles of clothing.
Accordingly, different standards have been developed
nr specific end use applications. For esample,
electrostatic behavior has be~n characterized by the
Department of Defense in publication DOD-HDBR-263 in
terms of surface resistivity. Materials with a
surface resistivity in the range of 109-1014 ohms
per square are antistatic. Materials with a surface
resistivity greater than 10l4 are insulators. An
effective internal antistat will provide surface
resistivity in the area labeled antistatic in the
above governmental document. When measuring surface
resistivity in the following e~amples, the Department
of Defense Standard was used.
Different standards have also been developed
for the static decay test. The static decay test is
carried out according to Federal Test Method Standard
lOlB, Method 4046 with a Static Decay Meter, model
406C obtained from Electro-Tech Systems, Inc. Static
decay i~ a measure of the ability of a material, when
grounded, to dissipate a known charge that has been
induced on the surface of the material. A sheet
æample (3~ ~ 6~) with l/8-l/16 inch thickness is
placed between clamp electrodes contained in a
Faraday cag~. A 5,000 volt charge is applied to the
surface of the specimen and the time in seconds
required to dis~ipate the charqe to 500 volts (10% o
its initial value~, after a ground is provided, is
then measured. Highly insulative materials will not
accept a full charge o~ 5,000 volts on their surface
or show residual charge before applying a charge. In
13 1 ~
-~2-
both instances, a static decay test cannot apply and
the mat~rials are indicated in e~amples as being
insulators. The National Fire Protection Association
in NFPA, code 56A, ~The Standard for the Use
Inhalation Anesthetics~ covers products used in the
hospital operating room and in hazardous
environments. It requires that the applied charge
drop to 10% of it initial value within 0.5 seconds at
50% relative humidity in order to qualify for use in
hospital operating rooms and other hazardous
enYironments. When measuring static decay in the
following e~amples, the above standard was employed
as the desired goal.
Generally, a more conductive material with
lower surface resistivity will show better antistatic
properties. However, many cases have been found
where static behavior is not always related to the
surface resistivity of the materials. One of the
main reasons is believed that static dissipation is
not only by conduction, but also by discharge static
electricity into the air. Consequently, materials
having same surface resistivity might have different
decay rate.
The following physical tests used in Esample
8, for example, are carried out in accordance with
ASTM standards: Tensile, ASTM D-638; Fle~ural, ASTM
D-790; Heat Distortion, ASTM D-648; Izod Impact, ASTM
D-256; and Durometer Hardness ~DW, ASrM D-2~40.
In all e~amples, antistats of ethylene o~ide
copolymers and comparative commercial antistats are
mised with thermoplastics or thermoplastic elastomers
in a Brabender*mi~er heated with hot oil. After
mi~ing is completed, a 6~ 3 6~ ~ 1/8~ or a 6a ~ 8
1/16~ sheet sample was press-molded. Samples were
visually e~amined for detrimental effects of
* Trade Mark
,C,
antistats such as marblizing or oiliness on the
surface, discoloration or decomposition of polymers
and brittleness.
EXAMPLE 1
Antistatic ethylene oxide copolymers were
synthesized in one quart, conditioned beverage
bottles and capped with self sealing rubber gaskets
and two-holed metal cap~ under nitrogen. Sieve-dried
toluene, ethylene oside, and comonomer were added
se~uentially. Polymerization was initiated by adding
the catalyst and proceeded by tumbling in an oil bath
at 110C. At the end of polymerization, a sample was
withdrawn to measure total solids for percent
conversion and the polymeriza~ion were short-stopped
with 8 ml. of isopropanol containing hindered
phenolic antiosidant at 0.3 weight percent to the
theoretically calculated e~pected polymer. Then
heptane was added to precipitate the polymer and
copolymers were dried at 60C under ~acuum
overnight. In order to obtain su~ficient amounts of
copolymers, copolymers obtained from several
duplicated bottle polymerizations were combined. In
all polymerizations, coordination catalyst solutions
prepared according to U.S. Patent 3,219,591 were
used. The molar ratio of catalyst ingredients of
triethylaluminum, anhydrous tetrahydrofuran, water,
2,4-pentanedione are 1:2:0.6:0.15-0.60. For
comparison, high molecular weight ethylene o~ide
homopolymers were also synthesized.
Conditions of prep~ration and
characterization of the ethylene oside copolymers are
set forth in Table I. Copolymers of ethylene oxide
with ethylen~ o~ide in the range ~rom 32 to 93 weight
percent were prepared. The following symbols are
used for comonomsrs:
-24_ ~3~8~
PO = propylene oxide
DO = dodecylene oside
BGE = n-butyl glycidyl ether
EHGE = 2-ethyl he~yl ~lycidyl ether
Most copolym~rs were obtained in good yields
greater than 80~ conversion within three hours
polymerization.
-25- 1 3 ~
1~ 0 0 0 ~ O O
xl~ o ~ O ~ o
1,~ o~ .~ o~
1~1 ~ - '` ' ~
1~1 ~ .4. ...
~ ~ u~ ~ ~ ~i~ _1 ~O~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~ '~3
cn
oooo. o or~
I ~1
C~ ~1ol ~ o c~
~: ~ 0
~ E~
~;1 ~ o o o u~
E~ zn h C u~ ~~ o O~ ~ ~t ~ r~ o u~
v~ ~ ~ o ~ 3 o _I~ ~ ~ c~
o ~ u~
~¦ e ~ c~ ,.,. ~ ,
E~ ooou~ ~ o~
0 ~ ~ C U~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ O O ~ ~ 0~
E~ x P~ u~
. ~1 o~ o ~ o ~o
I ~ u~ 7 ~
o o o u~ ~ o
o ~ u~ o ,~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ r~
c P4 4'~
c~ oooY- _l o
E~ ~: O u~ ~ o _l~ o o u~ o~ ~ ~ o ~
a ~ o ~ -~ ~ -~' ~I ~ 'I ' ~q
~e 0
ô ~ ~ ~ o V ~
~ oD a ~ o ~
~ o ~ ~ fi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~1 ~ O ~ ~ O
~ 0 ~--~ O Ko ~ 0
4~ d ^ ~ o :~
E 3 . . . ~ o
~; P, ~ N :> o ;~
1 3 1 ~
-26-
Dilusion solution viscosity (DSV) was
measured at 0.25 grams per 100 qrams toluene at 25C
with capillary viscometers according to ASTM D2857
referred to therein as inherent viscosity. Molecular
weight o~ copolymers determined by gel permeation
chromatography (GPC) using a Water GPC Model 200
instrument at 40C in tetrahydrofuran. Molecular
weights were calibrated with respect to standard
polystyrenes. Because of broad molecular weight
distribution, the interpretation of actual molecular
weight of copolymers by GCP is difficult. The weight
percent of the ethylene o~ide in the ethylene oxide
copolymer was determined by proton Nuclear Magnetic
Resonance SNMR) at 60 megahertz (MHz) using a Varian
T60 NMR Spectrometer. The glass transition
temperatures (Tg) and melting points (Tm) were
measured by Perkin Elmer DSC-2 differential scanning
calorimeter at 10C per minute heating and cooling
rates from -120C to 100C under 20cc per minute of
helium purge. Thermogravimetric analysis was
conducted on a DuPont 951 thermogravimetric analyzer
at 10C per minute heating rate from 30C to 825C
under a 180cc per minute nitrogen purge. Copolymers
of ethylene oside/propylene o~ide with ethylene o~ide
in th~ range from 32 to 70 weight percent are
elastomeric, from about 70 to 90 weight percent are
semiplastic, and from about 90 weight percent and
above are plastic. All antistats of the ethylene
o~ide comonomers are thermally stable and able to
sustain the process temperature of most plastics.
This esperiment demonstrates that a variety o
comonomers can be employed with EO to make an
antistatic agent within the correct molecular weight
or DSV for the present invention.
~ ~ 87
-27-
EXAM~E 2
In this e~ample the antistatic ethylene
o~ide copolymers of E~ample 1 were incorporated into
a semirigid PVC injection molding compound to
determine the antistatic properties of the antistatic
agents. The PVC compound is composed of:
Geon~ PVC homopolymer
resin (registered trademark
of B.F. Goodrich Company) 109 weight parts
Impact modifier 12 weight parts
Processing Aid 2 weight parts
Stabilizer 2 weight parts
Stearic Aci~ 0~5 weight parts
The mi~ing was conducted at 1709C in a
Brabender mi~er. The results of the antistatic
properties of 100 parts of PVC compound containing 10
parts of antistatic ethylene o~ide copolymers are set
forth in Table II as e~amples 2~-2K. Example 2A was
the control containing no antistatic agent but merely
the semirigid PVC injection molding compound. All
PVC compounds having 10 weight parts of the
antistatic agent had surface resisitivities less than
1014 ohm~sq. without any detrimental efect being
visually obserYed upon e~amination. It was found
that copolymers of ethylene o~ide and propylene o~ide
are more effective antistatic additives than
copolymers of ethylene o~ide with other comonomers of
1,2-epo~ide. It was also surprising to find that the
antistatic properties o the PVC compound are rather
i~sensitive to the composition of ethylene
o~ide/propylene o~ide antistat in the range from 3
to 85 weight percent EO.
~ 3 ~
-28-
_I
d
~ P~ æ ~ ~ ~ æ :~ æ
~ .
~ ~ o
v u~ O O
~ ooooOo-io_~O
~ o ~ 3
~, ~ C ~o , ...... .. .. ...
L ~ o o o o o o o o o o
~ ~ o o o~
U~ 0~ C _~ ~ ~ ,~ ~i ~ oo
~ 0
_~ 0 o o o o o o o o o o o
~J o oooooooooo
E~ ~ !3 Z ~ ~ ~ ~
V ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ V V
e~ 0 aS
O Z ~ V ~ J. ~
E~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ ~ ~ 0 oq
O C~ J J V ~ ~ V V ~ ~
c~ t, ~ a~a~
~ C~
o I ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o~
P.
C~ ~ ~ ~
I o o o o o C~ o ~ C~ 5:
.. a~ o P. P~ 3 x
~ ~ ~ ~ S3 bl ~ ~3
o~ ~ 3~
~ c ~ c U~ a ~ ~ c~
13~J7 ~
-29-
EXAMP~E 3
For the purposes of comparison, an ethylene
oxide homopolymer, low molecular weight liquid
ethylene o~ide/propylene oxide random copolymer, and
low molecular weight ethylens o~ide/propylene oxide
block copolymers were esamined with the PVC compound
used in E~ample 2. An ethylene oside homopolymer of
Antistat R made in E~ample I was synthesized in the
~ams manner as the thylene oside/propylene o~ide
copolymers of this invention. Another ethylene oxide
homopolymer (referred to as Ucommercial~) was
obtained from Poly Science, Inc. with an average
molecular weight of ~ I 106. Both ethylene o~ide
homopolymers are uneffective antistats, i.e. both are
classified as insulators according to the Department
of Defense standards mentioned previously. Another
commercially available antistat which was compared
was Carbowa~ 4000. Carbowas~ 4000 is a low
molecular weight polyethylene glycol obtained from
Union Carbide Company. Using polyethylene glycol as
an antistat is well known. However, polyethylene
glycol is difficult to blend into the PVC compound
and the sample became brittle.
Low molecular weight liquid ethylene
o~idefpropylene oside random copolymers were obtained
from Union Carbide under the tradename Ucon~ and
compared. The amount of ethylene oside vary from 0
to 75 weight percent. E3ample 3D has an aYerage
molecular weight of 12,000; Example 3E has an average
molecular weiyht of 2,500; E~ample 3E has an average
molecular weight of 1,050, E~ample 3G has an average
molecular weight of 4,000; E~ample 3H has an average
molecular weigh~ of ~,600; and E~ample 3I has an
average molecular weight of 1,220.
Though the Ucon0 polymsrs provide good
~ ~13~
-30-
antistat properties, all samples became brittle and
most showed poor surface properties (blooming,
marblizing, and/or oiliness).
~ lock copolymers of ethylene o~ide and
propylene oside wera obtained from BASF Wyandotte
Company under the tradename of Pluronic~. The
amount of ethylene o~ide can vary from 10 to 80
weight percent of the antistat. This amount is
indicated as the number before the word Pluronic in
Table III. Example 3J had an average mslecular
weight of 3,250; E~ample 3K has an average molecular
weight of 4,000; Sample 3L had an average molecular
weight of 3,250; Sample 3M had an averag~ molecular
weight of 4,000; and Sample 3N had an average
molecular weight of 4,000. Most Pluronic polymers
provide antistat properties. However, they were
difficult to blend with PVC and it is theorized that
the same problem would occur with other plastics such
as ABS, etc.. All samples became brittle and most
showed poor surface properties such as those
mentioned above with respect to the liquid
copolymers. The results of these samples are set
forth in Table III.
-31- - ~ 3 ~
,
..
~ ~ o o ~
0
v 3 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~M
,.,
U~
~ V3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , o ~ ,
C~ ,, o , ,,, 1,,,,, , ~ ,,, ,, ~
~02 +++ ++++~+ ++~++ P
ooo oooooo ~oooo
P ~ ~ ~ o u~ l o ~ o t tv~
o ~ ~ ~ 0
~S
O
~_~tV OOO OOOOOO OOOOO
l_~-~ OOO OOOOOO OOOOO
2 ~ ~ _1
E~ ~ ~ 0
~ U~ O ~ O ~ O ~1
o ~ 1 o
0 ~ ~ u~ u~ ~ o X ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ E~ 0 o~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m g ~
o o o o g O O O ~ h
~1 o o o u~ 0 0 0 ~ O O O O O
3 ~O ~ O r~ Oc~
~1 ~ O
o
O O O C:~ O O O ~O Q C:~ O O
OOO ~ OO~oo~ C~~OO~OO -~
~t ~
q~
~ o !!~ q v ~ ~. x ~ æ
Z e- ~ ~ ~,, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ æ O
13~ ?~Ç~
-32-
EXA~PL~ 4
For the purpose of comparison, commercial
non-ionic antistats were e~amined with PYC compound
used in Example II. These antistatic agents were
obtained from Argus Chemical Division of Witco
Chemical Company under the trade name o
Markstato. These commercial antistats are for
rigid or plasticized PVC. The antistatic agent used
in Sample 4A is a alkyl e~ho~ylated blend; the
antistatic agent used in 4B is the same as that used
in 4A escept that the percent weight of antistatic
agent is significantly lower; the antistdtic agent
set forth in samples 4C and 4D are polyether blends.
The results are set forth in Table IV.
--33-- 13 ~
, ~ ~ ,
3 I o ~ o
~ ~ ~t ".1 6t
a ~t ~ p
c~ t
0 3 O o o c~t
~t I 0 so 0 9~ ~t
~ ~ a ~ o 3
E- ~t ~ ~: ~ ~ ~
ct
~ta ~ t~t ~ trt ,~
a Z ~ _t 0 o o o
, lut u~ .... _l
E~ ~ ~t trt c~t ~ ~t
0
~;t ~ 0 o t~t o o
~. _I O ~rt O O --I
30~ 3~,~j -~ ;t
tr ~ t
~ t t..- ~
C~,t ~,t ~ ~t
e~ g at ~t ~
d, ~ o o _,
5~; ~ Q~ "
~t
t
-34
Samples 4A through 4C all show poor
antistatic properties. Although sample 4~ showed
good antistatic properties, but the sample was
brittle and showed poor surface properties (blooming,
etc.) such as those mentioned previously. In the
prior art section of this disclosure, it was stated
that anionic and cationic antistatic agents cause
poor surface and physical properties when blended
with polymeric materials. Additionally, it was
pointed out that the antistatic agents of the present
invention are nonionic. E~ample 4 demonstratss that
some nonionic antistatic agents can also cause poor
surface and physical properties. Accordingly, the
present invention i5 more than merely employing a
solid nonionic antistat.
EXAMPLE 5
For comparison purposes, commercial cationic
antistats based upon amines, amides, and phosphates
were e~amined with the PVC compound used in Esample
II. The amines were etho~ylated and obtained from
Humco Chemical Division of Witco Chemical Corp. under
the trade name of Kemamine~. These antistats of
etho~ylated amines are well known for use with
polyolefins and also available as Armostat~ from
~oury and markstat~ AL-lO from Argus. Ethosylated
amide~ were obtained from A~zo Chemie America under
the trade name of Ethmid0 and from Onysol Chemical
Company under the trade name of Ony~ol~. Phosphate
ester was obtained from Emery Industries under the
trade name of Tryfac~. Phosphate es~ers are also
available as Safac0 from GAF Corporation and
Zelec~ from DuPont. Phosphate esters are well
known antistats for te~tile applications. The
percent weight of ethylene oside in the antistatic
agents are set forth in Table V. While some
-35-
antistatic additives show good antistatic properties,
all samples discolored which indicated the
decomposition of the PVC compound. Cationic
antistatic agents generally cause stability problems
of PVC compounds. The non-ionic antistats agents of
the present invention are superior to cationic
antistatic agents since non-ionic antistats cause no
stability problems.
-36~
al ~_~ O C
~3 ~ ~ 3 ~
_, ~ a ~ ~ ~ h
a t~
V ~ ~¦ ~ V ~ o
:~ # u~ O p ~0 p ~ O O 1~
o ~ o 3 o ~ ~ o o
U~
~ ~ ~ . o ~
C ~-1 O O O O ~ O O O
-- G¦ O O O O O O O O
O " ~ U~
~ ~ ~ ~1 ~O 03 t`~l ~ g I Cl~
V
al E~ 0
J Q~
d ~ o
~ ~3~3~
a
~ -o e ~ w ~
X ~ Q
-37-
EXAMPLE 6
For comparison purposes, commercial cationic
antistats of guaternary ammonium salts were e~amined
with the PVC csmpound used in E~ample 2. Quaternary
ammonium salts wer0 obtained from Argas Chemical
Divisisn of Wico Chemical Company under the trade
name of Markstat~ and from American Cyanamide
Company under the trade name of Cyastat~ as heat
stable antistats. The results are set forth in Table
VI. All the samples had low surface resisitivities
with the e2ception of Sample 6c, which decomposed and
discolored so badly that no surface resistivity
measurement could be made. All of the samples
discolored to an unacceptable level.
~
-38~
d
-~ 3 3 3- S .LI
~ o o o o o
V ~ ~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~
R c~
C~
C) ~ 11
K ~ I
U~ I ~ to ~ CO
E~ ~ ~a O _l ~
O O -i0 0 ~ -
u~ a~ _,
O :~ D
li4 ~ ~
O ~ ~ ~$ ~ ~h
c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 14
E-~ ~ ~0 E O O ~9 o o v
_~ ~ ~ ~ ,t;
~o u~ ~
CO
. ~
~ ~ ~ ~ o
:~ ~ ~ o
~ ll
~ ~ ~`5
o ~
~ ~ ~ 0 v ~
o ~ 0 ~
u
h 0 0
v
C~
~-
08
_ ~ J J~
0'~0'0'
~,C q
~O `D
-39-
EXAMP~ 7
In this e~ample, the concentration of the
antistat and its effects with respect to its
antistatic properties when combined with the PVC
compound used in E~ample 2 is demonstrated. In
samples 7A - 7G, Antistat (A) tsee Example 1) of the
present invention was used. Antistatic properties,
when the antistat was blended with the PVC, improved
as the concentration of the antistat increased.
However, when the concentration of the antistat
became too high, poor surface properties developed.
Low molecular weight antistat~ of Pluronic~
ethylene oside copolymers were also esamined as set
forth in samples 7H - 7M. At high concentration,
some of these liquid block copolymers show good
antistatic properties, however, all samples were
brittle and/or showed poor surface properties.
Samples having a low concentration of antistatic
material, not only showed poor antistatic properties,
but most samples ~ere still brittle and/or contained
poor surface features.
-40-
~ 3~87~
0 ~ a ~ d ~ ~
I
I ~. J. h
~ V
I P~ ~ O
I I O O O rl It~
, ~ileu ooooo~
~ ~_ ~ H
O
E~ ~ ~ o ~
~ 0~0 ++++++I
~ ~; ~ o g ~
O ~0 0 O 00 ~ O 0~ _~ O
U~
o o o 9 ~ o u~
E~.~ .......
V ~ U~ o U~ o r~
E- . E-
C~
<I ~ H q '-¦ ~ ~ "C 1 C
c I ~ v ~
a
~ 1 2
o~: ;~ 0 w ~ 0 ~ ~ ~q
~ ~ aaa~
Z: O
OO U~
~ I ¢1 ~ 0
O~ E~
E~ 0
V O
1 5q C~ ~OOOOOO E~
P~ P~ P. ~ P~ ~ ~ ~5
~ ~O ~O O O ~O O O i ~
E~
O. V~
~ 0 ~ a: m
-41- 1 3 ~ 3
,. ql
Ct ~ N
~ U~ U
2 ~ h ~ ~1 ~1 1.1 0
J O O O O O
a ~ u ~
C ~o ~ 0
__ ~ d 4
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~
O ~ ~ 11
U ~ ~ C~ u~
E- ~- ~ ~
p, 0 E + I + ~ + + ~::
~ ~ .r4 ~ 1~
3 t~ e~ c o o o o o o
a c~ ......
~ g~
C~
U~ ~ ~ h
I_ ~ I O U~ o ~ o U~
O ~ ~ O ~ o ~ o t~
~_ R 0
P i~ 111
~ O
_ C~
~ ~ 0 oo 1~ 1~ _I _1 0
o o ~ C`~ o o _I
C ~ U~t~ U ~
~ c ~ o 8 g 8 ~o ~ "
~ :S h ~ ~
~ U~ ~ ~
_ a~ ~ h
O ~ O 9 O O
O O
~E ~1 ~ ooc~ooo ~
_ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a o o o o o o ~ ~'
~ a ~ ~ ~ O
Q~ I J
~ o 2 ~ " ,, " "~ ,~ b 0
~ o ~ I` ~ ~ ~ ~ :a ~
~ ~ Y O
-42-
EXAMPLE 8
Physical properties of the antistatic PVC
compounds used in Example 2 are shown in Table VIII.
The PVC compounds containing Antistat A, B, D, F, and
G did not significantly impair physical properties.
Whereas impact properties of the PVC compound
containing low molecular weight antistats of Ucon~
and Pluronic~ ethylene oxide copolymers were
severely damaged even at lower concentration.
-43- 3.~ ~7~
~ O o O O U~
~ ~ ~ æ~ N _l
~ 2 o ~ N
a O 2 ~
8 0 ~ U. _, ~ ~ '' ~ " ''
~ o ~ 3~ o
0~ o
~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ tlO O r.
~ ~ c ~
~ ~ ~ O O N
a ~ ~ N O ~r N 1~ 1'~ ~1 0 1
.: ~ 0 ~ ~ O r~
~ O I
!i o O ~ ~ la , O ~ '5,
u '' æ ~ ~ ," ~ ~ o
-~ Z o ~ ~ ~o ~ ~o o U~
~ a ~ 2 ~ ~C ~ a ~ L p ~C
_44_ ~3~7~
EXAMPLE 9
Dynamic thermal stability tests were also
carried out to esamine the ef~ect of antistats on the
stability of the PVC compounds used in Esample 2. In
particular, the mi~ing time in minutes that it took
for a particular sample to yellow and then to blacken
was recorded. If an additive impair the thermal
stability of PVC, it will show a shorter time to
yellowen and blacken the sample and a shorter time to
reach minimum torque indicatin~ a faster breakdown of
PVC in this test.
In this e~ample, an antistat was mixed with
PVC compound in a Brabender mixer at 190C and 185
rpm. The sample was pinched every two minutes and
color development was examined. The results are set
forth in Table IX below.
Table IX
Dy~amic Thermal Sta~ility Tests
Mi~ing Time in Minutes
Antistat Antistat Cyastat
con~-Ql A D LS
Example No. 9A 9B 9C 9D
Antistat None EO/PO EO/PO Quat
Wt. Type % -- 10 10 3.5
Early color
before light
yellow. 8 10 12 4
Black color 28 32 34 20
Minimum Torque26 26 28 20
As shown in Table IX, antistatic E0/PO
copolymers of this invention do not impair the
thermal stability of PVC compounds. Whereas
commercial so called heat stable quaternary ammonium
salt, Cyastat~ LS causes severe degradation of PVC
compound.
1 3 ~
-45-
EXAMPLE 10
The effect of antistats on the thermal
stability of PVC compounds was also e~amined with
thermogravimetric analysis. The incorporation of
antistatic EO/PO copolymers of this invention into
PVC compounds do not lower the temperature at ma~imum
rate of weight loss ~Table X). On the other hand,
the incorporation commercial cationic antistatic
amines or quaternary ammonium salts severely damaged
the therm~l stability of PVC compounds.
Tahle X
Thermoq~avimetric Analysis of Antistatic
PVC Compounds
~C at
E~ample Ma~imum Rate
No._ Antis~at Type Wt. % of Wt. Loss
10A Control ~ 291
10B Antistat A EO/PO 10 304
10C Antistat E EO/PO 10 301
10D Markstat AL-33 Quat 3.5 265
10E Kemamine AS-900 Amine 5.0 2S4
10F Kemamine AS-974/l Amine 5.0 257
E~AMPLE 11
In this e~ample, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were e~amined for A8S thermoplastics.
ABS thermoplastics are terpolymers of acrylonitrile-
butadiene-styrene. The following ~S thermoplastics
obtained from Borg-Warner Chemicals were studied:
1. Cycolac oT, a general purpose molding
material, mised at 190C.
2. Cycolac oL, a high impact injection
molding material, mixed at 190C.
3. Cycolac ~KJB, a medium-impact,
13
-46-
flame-retardant injection molding material, mi~ed at
185C.
4. BlendesO 131, a material for
calendered sheet applications and a modifier for PVC
products, mi~ed at 180C.
As shown in Table XI~ EO copolymers of this
invention were effective antistats for ABS
thermoplastics. On the other hand, EO homopolymer,
low molecular weight EO copolymer, and amine type
antistats were uneffective. Table XIa shows the
physical properties of Cycolac L and T ABS
thermoplastics containing EO copolymers of this
invention. The results indicate ~hat the antistatic
agents of the present invention are useful with ABS
polymeric materials.
-47~
3 o ~ I I I I I I I I I I I r l o u~ o
~ r~ ~ i r l t~
E c~ ~o ~~ ~1 ~ ~ tr~ ~
c O E~ O I a~ r~ I O I I O
.Ir
~ ~J r l ~ ~ r ~ ~ r ~
c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ + + + +
~ _1 9C ;YI ~q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~q ~ ~ b~
4~ l~i o I o ~ ~ ~ ~ o 1~ ~ r l o~
~ 1~ i ~ r i 1~ ~ i ~ r t i i
C R A
_ C.~ ~ ~ ~
i~ C~ ~ D4 ~ I I O I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I
r;
S~ A
~ O ~-
~¢ ~ .33 O OOu.OO~OO~OOO 0OO~
a ~ r l ~ 1 ~I r l ~1 r l ~ r I r l r-~
C
~ ~ ~ ~
q Y~ ~
~.
C
V ~ ~
O I O
V _~ U
3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ O
aa ~ ~ ~a ~
~ a~ ~ 2 æ 2 æ o ~ ~ 2
c a ~ O O O O O O ~ ~ o
-4 8- 1 3 1 8 l ~ ~
O ¦ --I O N
~ ~ ~ U N ~ ~0 N N N
U Yl ~ U U N V~ N
11; ~ ~ I ~ No ~
~ O ~
~ 2 ,, o
~ i O ' ~
~O ~ ~ ~I~ ~0 ~ ~
111 N ~ N1-'1 0~ m 111
~3~ j N ~
~ æ l "~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o
O~ 0 1~ 1~ ~ N
~ .0
~ ~ >~ ~ U O
u u ~ a o ~o " ~ < ~ 8 ~
n u
~ a o ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ a ~
_4 9 _ 1 3 ?'1 ~J 7 L~ ~
EX~IPLE 12
In this example, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were esamined as antistats for
polystyrene. Eighty parts high impact injection
molding polystyrene, commercially known as Cosden~
945, was obtained from Cosden Oil and Chemical Co,
and mi~ed with 20 parts of Antistat C at 190C. The
mi~ture gave a surface resistivity of 5.3~1012
ohm/sq. and a decay rate (10% cut) of 0.75 sec.
Cosden 945 without antistat gives a surface
resistivity of greater than 1015 ohm/sq. and is an
insulator as indicated by the decay rate. Eigh~y
parts of Styron~ 420, obtained from Dow Chemical
Co., was mi~ed with 20 parts of Antistat C at 190C.
The mi~ture gave a surface resistivity of 9.6 x
1011 ohm~sq. and a decay rate (10% cut) of 0.6
sec. Styron 420 without antistat gives a surface
resistivity of greater than 10l5 ohm~sq. and is an
insulator as indicated by the decay rate. The
results are summarized in Table XII
EX~MPL~ 1~
In this example, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were esamined for impact-modified
styrene-maleic anhydride ~erpolymers, a polymer blend
of ABS and styrene-mal~ic anhydrin copolymer (SMA).
To 90 parts of high heat grade ABS/5~A polymer blend,
commercially known as Cadon~ 127, obtained from
Monsanto, was mi~ed with 10 parts of antistat at
190C. Antistat A gives a surface resistivity of 3.8
x 1012 ohm~sq. and a decary rate (10% cut~ of 1.2
sec.; Antistat D gives a surface resistivity of 4.5 x
1012 ohm/sq. and a decay rate (10% cut~ of 1.2
sec. Cadon 127 without antistat gives a surface
resistivity of greater than 1015 ohm/sq. and is an
_50~ 7'~ ~
o
. I r~ o W ~ ~1 o q oo ~ u~
o, o
W~
3 ~ ~
c~ l ~ + ~ ,
~ ~ -1 0~
oq O O
P
-'I
O I
H ~1~ 1 1~ 0 + 1~ ~ ~ U') O 1~ O
X -~ ~ V U~
~ 0~~-
~ ~ U' 0~ + O
E~ ~ O ~ P ~ ~ O ~ O N
1: _I ~ N N N N
~;: ~cl h
.~ ~o~ ~1
V ~1~ N O ~` N N N
I O
I . . O
C 0~ 0 ~t ~
I~ I
~0
~ o ~ I ^ o
O O u~
:- .~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ a ~ X
V 0 ~q ~ o
0
0 0~ ~"q ~., c? ~ ~ E~ ~ Q.
~ ~ . E~ 0 ~ O `O C~ ~ ~ .d ^
æ h J~ ~ ~ J N Rl V 0
i v ~ _I ~ R --~
D. 0 ~ ~S10 ~ ~ 0 ~ I p
3 _~ a ~ 3 ~ V 'a ~ d u~ E
7~ d ~ J N Q~
-51- 1 3 ~ 3
T~ble XIII
tatic ~d PhYelc~l Prc~ç~tle~ of SYtrene - ~aleic
Anh~drid~ Ter~olvme~
E~ample ~o. 1~ 13C
Antistat Control ~O/PO E9/PO
ID -- Anti~tat A Antlstat B
~OX -- 85 60
~t% O 10 10
Surface Be~iatlvity, o~/cq ~1.0~+15 3.82~12 4.5~+12
Decay rate ~t 10%, sec. Inaulator 1.20 1.20
Flexural Te~ts/ASTM ~-790
Modulus; pQislO~O 352 267 269
StreD~th, poislOOO 8.2 5.8 5.6
~eat Di~tortion, ASTM D-648
C at 264 ~81 98 103 98
Izod Iopact, ASTM D-256
ft-lb/in of noech 3.6 5.1 2.2
Tensile/ASTM D-638
Stron8th at yield, lOOOsp~ 4.2 n.d. 2.3
Modulus, 100, OOOYp31 3.2 n.d. 2.3
Durometer ~ardnes~ "D"
ASTM D2240 ~0 73 73
-52~ 3 ~ ~ ~
insulator by decay rate. Antistatic and physical
properties of Cadon 127 are shown in Table XIII.
EXAMPLE 14
In this e~ample, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were e~amined as antistats for
polyacetal. Celcon~ M270-04, obtained from
Celanese Co., is a high flow injection molding grade
polyacetal. It was mi~ed with antistats at 195C.
As shown in Table XIV, Antistats ~, D, E and J (see
E~ample 1) of this invention are effective antistats
for polyacetal ~Esample 148-14I). On the other hand,
polyacetal containing 5 parts of Kemamine AS-974/1
(sea Esample 5) shows no improvement on surface
resistivity or static decay rate (E~ample 14J).
5 3 1 3 1 3 I L~ ~
~ 3~o .4 ~, I 111 ~
3 a
3 ~o O ~ 0 ~0 ~ O o
3 v 3 ~ O ~ ~ N 3 ~
Cl N
~ ~ ~ ~ O o 3
. ,~ a æ ~ NO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
b ~ O o o ~ o "~ o ~ ~ O 1`
_ 1~. ~ O O N .-~ m
~ ~ O ~ 3 ~ ~~O ~ O ~
P~l `O N
_ ~ N ~o 1~4 o oO o 0 :o o c~
o N o ~ O~ `O O ~7
1~1 ~1 N
~ V
~ ~1 O :~ N ~ O O 10
~ 8 . 3 'o
o; ~o o
~1 11 11~ 4 3 v
a c
-54-
EXAMPLE 15
In this example, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were e~amined a,s antistats for
modified polyphenylene oxide. NorylO PC180, a
polymer blend of polyphenylene o~ide and polystyrene
obtained from General Electric Co., is a computer and
business equipment grade of polymeric material. It
was mi~ed with antistats at 180C. As shown in Table
XV, Antistats B, C and E of this invention are
effective for modified polyphenylene o~ide.
-55- ~3~
~ . .
c~ 2 ~ o ~ ~ u~' ~ ~ o
_, o o
v
.
_~
~ ~ ,~ ~ o ~ ~ c~
_I_~ ~ . I~. . .
o -' ~ u~ ~ ~ ' -'
o~ ~ o ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
_, o ~ o ~ a d
~- 0 G~
~ .-
P~ ~ ~ r~ O 5~ ' `
~ _I O ~ _i t.~ I~ ~ ~ ~
Q~ ~4 CO
~ ~1
~ O + ~ ~
~: ~ ~ ~ o Yl o ~ oo ~ o
:~ u~ 51
_I o ~ o
o
l ~
_ ~ v
.~ ~ 0 ~
I _1 _I 1
E- v ~ ~
,i o . ~ ~ ~o _I
h
P,~ ~.1
O
1 ~
I ~C ~ ~ -+1 ~ O
I U" ~ ~ O U~I~ ~ `D
_I O C 0 ~ X
I ~5 0
l C~ _l
I . , O
~ 00 0
I ~ O ~ _1
l O' ~
l I' I `O ~ _
I ~ g ~ oO
I ~ ~ o ~1 ¢ ~ o ~ ~ ô â~
~ O ~ ,~
ID O Ul - O
~ CJ 0 c~, v~ d~i 0 Q. 0
o a~ A O `tJ ~<lC .C
V ~ ~ ~0 ~ V
0 ~ ~ ~ vEl
~ o v ~ ~ ~4 o ~ ~ o v o~ ~ o o v~
E~ 1~3 3E . u~ O NO ~ S t~ æ p ~¢
-56- ~ 3~
EXAMPLE 16
In this e~ample, antistatic EO copolymers of
this invention were esamined for polyester.
HytrelO 6346, obtained from DuPont Co., is a
thermoplastic elastomer of a polyester-ether block
copolymer comprising polybutylene terephthalate (PBT)
hard segments and polytetramethylene glycol
terephthalate soft segments. To Ninety parts of
Hytrel~ was mi~ed with 10 parts o~ Antistat A at
210C. The mi~ure gave a surface resistivity of 9.4
x 1011 ohm/sq. and a decay rate (10% cut) of 0.15
sec. Hytrel 6346 without antistat gave a surface
resistivity greater than 1015 ohm/sq and was
classified as an insulator by decay rate.
EXAMPL~ 17
In this esample, antistatic EO copolymer o
this invention was examined with polycarbonate ~PC).
Le~anO 141; obtained from General Electric Co. is
an in~ection moding resin. Eighty-five parts of
Le~an 141 was mixed with 15 parts of Antistat C at
225C. The mi~ture gives a surface resistivity of
9.4 ~ 1013 ohm/sg. ~e~an 141 without antistat give
a surface resistivity of greater than 101~ ohm/sq.
EXAMP~ 18
In this example, antistatic EO copolymer of
this invention was esamined with polyurethane (PUR~.
EstaneO 58130, a thermoplastic polyurethane, was
obtained from BFGoodrich Co. ~inety parts of Estane
58130 was mi~ed with ten parts of Antistat A (EO~PO
copolymer) at 210C. The mi~ture gives a surface
resistivity of 5.OglO12 ohm/sq. When ten parts of
Antistat G SEO/DO copolymer) is incorporated, the
mi~ture gives a surface resistivity of 3.1~1013
ohm/sq.
-57-
EX~MPLE 19
In this e~ample, antistatic EG copolymer of
this invention was ezamined with a PVC compound for
general purpose blow molding for bottles, etc.
Geon~ 87444 is a commercial PVC compound available
from The B.F.Goodrich Company useful for blow
molding. To Geono 87444 was mi~ed 10 and 15 parts
by weight Antistat C at 180C for 3 minutes. As
shown in Table XVI, the ~O copolymer of the present
invention is an effective antistat additive for PVC
blow molding compound.
-58- ~ 3 ~
Table XVI
Anti3tatiQand PhYs~ cal ProDerti~s of Antistatic PVC Com~ound
of General PurDose Blow Moldin~
Example ~o. 1~4 l9B l9C
Anti~tat Control Antistat C Antistat C
Type -- ~0/P0 F0/P0
~0% -- 77 77
wt% 0 10 15
Surface Resistivity, ohm/sq ~l.O~fl5 4.2F+11 1.2Efll
Dec~y rate at 10%, sec. InRulator 0.09 0.02
Flesural Tests, ASTM D-790
~odulus, ~ixlO00 362 301 258
Stren8th, psixlO00 10.5 6.5 4.6
Tensile
Stren8th at yield, lOOOxps 6.4 3.7 2.3
Modulu~, 100,OOOxpsi 3.4 2.9 2.5
Durometer Hardne~s "D"
AS17~ D2240 86 75 n.d.
1 3 ~ 8 '~
EXAMPLE 20
In this e~ample, antistatic EO copolymer of
this invention was ezamined with PVC compound of
interior profile estrusion for vinyl blinds, etc.
Geono ~7408 is a commercial PVC compound a~ailable
from BFGoodrich Co. for interior profile e~trusion.
The mi~ing of the PVC compound with Antistat C was
carried out at 210C for two minutes. The PVC
compound with 10 parts o Antistat C gives a surface
resistivity of ~.7slO11 ohm/sq an~ a decay rate
(10~ cut) of 0.32 sec. With 15 parts of Antistat C,
the compound gives a surface resistivity of
2.2210ll ohm/sg and a decay rate (10~ cut) of 0.08
sec. Without any antistat, the PVC compound gives a
surface resistivity greater than 1.0~1016 ohm/sq
and is classified as an insulator by decay rate.
~sm~
In this esample, permanence of antistatic
EO/PO copolymers of this invention was e~amined.
Antistatic properties of several PVC compounds of
Examples 2 and 7 were measured aæ a function of
storage time. The results are shown in Table XVII.
In most cases, the surface resistivity does
not change drastically as a function of storage time;
with unknown reason, decay rate is improved.
-60- ~31~
. ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ o ~o ~o
o ... ....
U~ ooo oooo
CC
.. ~
-~ - U'~ ~ o o
., ... ....
~ ~ 0~1~ 0000
C~
c
3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -' 1
1~ ooo oooo
~ K ~ S~: ~ 1;;3
P~ o ~ o o U~
I- ... ...
__ ~ ~ ~
H _ ~
~ ~ ~.
~ C~1_~ _~
000 0000
~LH
U~L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'i C~i
V
O
~O U~
O O _~ O It~ O
:~
3 u~
o
1~ ~
.
~- ~U O O ~ O O
0g ~ ~e
.. ~ ~ O O O V O O O O
V U~ O
~ ~,
0 c~
I .. ..
I
I ~ ~
-61- ~31~ J ~ ~
Thus, it has been apparent that there has
been provided, in accordance with the invention, an
antistat that fully satisfies the objects, aims, and
advantages set forth above. While the invention has
been described in conjunction with specific
embodiments thereof, it is evident that many
alternatives, modification, and variations will be
apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the
foregoing description. Accordingly, the present
invention is intended to embrace all such
al~ernatives, modifications, and variations as fall
within the spirit and scope of it.
