Language selection

Search

Patent 1324266 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1324266
(21) Application Number: 609986
(54) English Title: CONCRETE SLABS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALLS
(54) French Title: DALLES DE BETON SERVANT A LA CONSTRUCTION DE MURS DE RETENUE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 72/45
  • 61/51
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E02D 29/02 (2006.01)
  • E04B 2/02 (2006.01)
  • E04B 2/06 (2006.01)
  • E04C 1/39 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RATTE, ALAIN (Canada)
  • CASTONGUAY, BERTIN (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • OLDCASTLE BUILDING PRODUCTS CANADA, INC. (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: BKP GP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1993-11-16
(22) Filed Date: 1989-08-31
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


CONCRETE SLABS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RETAINING WALLS
ABSTRACT
Concrete slabs for building retaining walls each
concrete slab comprising at least two generally equal length and
equal width elements. The elements are defined by dummy grooves,
allowing, but not necessitating, breakage of the elements into
separate blocks. Some of the dummy grooves allow the creation
of at least two (2) retaining wall blocks having half the length
of the remaining elements.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS



1. A pre-cast slab for use in the construction of
retaining walls comprising an upper face and a lower face,
at least said upper face comprising a plurality of grooves
defining at least two (2) elements allowing, but not
necessitating, breakage of said elements into separate
blocks along said grooves, each said element having
generally the same length and the same width and comprising:

- a plurality of retaining pins disposed in parallel to
the longitudinal axis of said element on its upper
face;

- recess means disposed in parallel to the longitudinal
axis of the lower face of said element, said recess
means and retaining pins having a configuration so as
to matingly interlock when such elements are broken
into blocks which are disposed in horizontal courses
one upon the other;

wherein at least one (1) of said elements further comprises
additional grooves defining at least two substantially equal
sub-elements in said element.

2. A pre-cast slab according to claim 1, wherein said
recess means comprise a trapezoidal groove throughout a
major portion but not all the length of said element.

3. A pre-cast slab according to claim 1, wherein said pins
are shaped like a shallow cylinder.

11


4. A pre-cast slab according to claim 1, wherein said pins
are shaped like a truncated cone.

5. A pre-cast slab according to claim 1, wherein said
lower face comprises grooves and additional grooves located
in overlying relationship with said grooves and additional
grooves located on said upper face.

6. A pre-cast slab according to claim 2, 4 or 5,
comprising three elements, two of which comprise four (4)
retaining pins, whereas the remaining element comprises two
(2) retaining pins each located adjacent one end thereof.

12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ 1~2~266
- 2 -
FIELD OF TH~ PRESENT INVENTION

The present invention relates to retaining wall blocks
and more particularly to pre-cast slabs which can be divided into
a plurality of blocks of different sizes, depending on the needs
during the construction of the retaining wall.

10DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART

The construction of retaining walls with pre-cast
interlocking concrete blocks is well known. For example, see
Canadian Industrial Design 44,696 (Thomas), U.S. Patent 468,838
(Steiger), Canadian Patent 941,626 (Risi), U.S. Patents 3,488,964
(Kubo), 4,193,718 (Wahrendorf et al) and 4,372,091 (Toffolon,
Brown).

However, when constructing retaining walls using such
blocks, it is necessary to have a plurality of different blocks
in order to achieve an aesthetically pleasing result. To this
end, full-length blocks and half-length blocks are required. The
half-length blocks are used in making the ends of the walls
and/or corners. Furthermore, in the case of retaining walls
having more than a nominal height, it is preferable to provide
blocks having different widths in order to provide a greater mass
in the lower portion of the wall to increase the stability of the
wall.

30Finally, headers are required to provide a more
aesthetically pleasing top or finishing row of blocks.

This requirement for a plurality of different blocks,
each having a different configuration requires a plurality of
different moulds which increases the cost of producing such
blocks, thus increasing the cost of a retaining wall built with
such blocks. In addition, careful planning is required when
ordering the various types of blocks necessary to construct a



",

.,.,. ~ :
:- . r

,~

-- 132~26~
-- 3
,
ogiven retaining wall. Indeed, if a given block is not provided
in sufficient quantity, costly delays may be incurred.
.
OBJECTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

It is a general object of the present invention to
provide a retaining wall construction system which will
substantially lessen the disadvantages of the prior art by
providing a pre-cast slab comprising a plurality of elements 10 which can be divided into a plurality of blocks having the
required configuration during the construction of a given
retaining wall.

Another object of the present invention is to provide
such a pre-cast slab which can be divided in blocks of different
widths and lengths.

¦ An object of the present invention to provide such a
pre-cast slab for the construction of retaining walls that will
20 not require mortar or any other binder to form a solid and sturdy
wall.

J Yet another object of the present invention is to
provide a pre-cast slab for the construction of retaining walls
25 which allows but does not require the addition of tie backs or
other similar horizontal retention means.

Another object of the present invention is to provide
i a pre-cast slab for the construction of retaining walls which is
30 inexpensive to manufacture, simple to use and effective in its
operation.

Briefly, in accordance with the present invention, a
pre-cast slab for use in the construction of retaining walls
35 comprises an upper face and a lower face, at least said upper
face comprising a plurality of grooves defining at least two (2)




,.,: ~ ~ ~ , - :


: :: , .

- 13242~
4 --

elements allowing, but not necessitating, breakage of said
elements into separate blocks along said dummy grooves, each said
element having generally the same length and the same width and
- comprising:
- an upper face on which are disposed a plurality of
retaining pins extending axially of said element;

- a lower face having recess means extending axially of
said element, having a configuration so as to matingly
interlock when such elements are broken into blocks
which are disposed in horizontal courses one upon the
other;
il ~
wherein at least one (l) of said elements comprises further
groove~ defining at least two substantially equal sub-
~ elements in said element.
.

~i 20 Such recess means may comprise a trapezoidal groove
throughout substantially the length of said element and such pins
may be shaped like a truncated cone.

These and other objects and advantages of the present
invention will no doubt become apparent to those of ordinary
skill in the art after having read the following detailed
~ description of a preferred embodiment of the invention.

t3 30
DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

For the purpose of clarifying the nature of the present
, invention, an embodiment of the invention is illustrated in the
hereinbelow-described figures of the accompanying drawings and
is described in detail hereinafter.


:,


:~:


~,................................... . .
r.~

-`` 132~26~
- 5

Figure 1 is a top perspective view of a concrete slab
made in accordance with the present
invention;
Figure 2 is a bottom view of the concrete slab of
Figure l;

Figure 3 is a top perspective view of the concrete
slab of figure 1 which has been broken into
four (4) separate blocks;

Figure 4 is a side elevation view of a retaining wall
constructed with blocks which were broken off
concrete slabs similar to the one shown in
Figure l;

Figure 5 is a perspective view of another concr te
slab from which header blocks may be broken
off;

Figure 6 is a partial perspective view of a retaining
wall constructed with blocks broken off
concrete slabs similar to those shown in
Figures 1 and 5.

DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

In figures 1 and 2, a concrete slab is shown and is
generally referred to as numeral 5.

The slab 5 is pre-cast, that is cast before arrival at
the building site. If made of concrete, the slab may have
embedded therein suitable reinforcing elements (not shown) to
give additional strength to the resulting blocks when such is



.-. . . . ~ . - .




,~ . . .

- " 1324266

-6-
~ required. These reinforcing elements may comprise a steel grid or
s the like (not shown). since the method of obtaining those pre-cast
slabs or blocks is well-known in the art, same will not be
described any further.
' Each of said slab 5 has a generally rectangular top face lo,
i a bottom face 15 and side faces 20, 21, 22, and 23. The top face
of slab 5 comprises grooves 31, 32, and 33 while the bottom face 15
comprises grooves 34, 35, and 36 which are located in overlying
0relationship with respect to grooves 31, 32, and 33 respectively.
, . . .

~ Grooves 31/34 and 32/35 define three elements 60, 61, and 62
3 while grooves 33/36 divide element 62 in two further elements 62A
and 62B.
A plurality of protrusions 50 extend upwardly from the upper
~ face 10. Each protrusion has the shape of a shallow cylinder or
'~, preferably of a truncated cone and are placed in line near the
longitudinal axis of the upper face 10 of each element.
Each of these elements may form a separate block by breaking
the slab along the groove6 separating it from its neighbouring
element.

25A block may also comprise two elements, for example elements
60 and 61 form a wide block when elements 62A and 62B are broken




~: ' . . - .

- 132~2~

-7-
off slab 5. Another example is illustrated in figure 4 where a
block 60 was broken off three slabs 5. The three wide blocks 61/62
form the three lowermost rows, the three broken off blocks 60 form
the next three rows while header block 71 was broken off header
slab 70 or is a block 61 from which the pins 50 have been removed
by a chisel or the like.



When an element is broken off to form a separate block, the
portion of the grooves remaining on the severed block forms a
chamfer which provides a mortar joint look when courses of severed
blocks are placed one over the other to form the retaining wall.



~ The under face 15 of each of the elements 60, 61, 62A, and 62B
i is provided with a longitudinal trapezoidal slot 55, which is
~ 15 capable of engagingly receiving the upper protrusions 50, when the
7 blocks are piled one on top of the other (in staggered or aligned
relationship) during the erection of a retaining wall.



For each particular element such as element 60, the
20 ~protrusions 50 are preferably slightly rearwardly offset with
respect to the corresponding slot 55 so that upon the erection of
the retaining wall, each row of same will be automatically set back
a predetermined distance D from the row underneath. Typically,
this distance D from the center of the protrusion 50 in upper face

10 to the center of the corresponding slot 55, in underface 15 is
such that an inclination of the retaining wall to the vertical of


~, .


. . .

"``` ~32~2~

about 5 to 15 is provided. However, D may be adjusted to provide
any other desired inclination. In addition, the width of the slot
55 should slightly exceed the width or diameter of the protrusions
50 to allow ade~uate fitting.




It should be noted that the slots 55 extend along the
longitudinal axis of each element but end at a certain distance
from the side faces of each element. Element 62, as explained
above, can be divided into two half elements 62A and 62B along the
dummy grooves 33l36. Therefore the slot in each half element 62A
and 62B similarly does not extend the way to the end walls.




Alternatively, however, the slots 55 may, if desired, extend
the full length of each block element as do the slots 31 and 32,
for example. Additionally, the grooves 33/36 may, if desired, end
at a certain distance from the groove 32 in a manner similar to
slots 55 as seen in figure 2, ie. the grooves 33/36 may be blocked
off adjacent grooves 32 and 35.



As it will be appreciated, one of the elements, for example
element 61 is provided with only two protrusions 50. By so doing,
the block placed in the row above the element 61 can be placed
perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of element 61 without
interfering with the interlocking of the other blocks, for example
when forming a corner. Furthermore, element 61 may be used as a
header block by simply removing the two protrusions.




.

r.


.'.~; '~ ~ .
'' ' ' .

132~2~

. -8a-
- Alternatively, however, the element 61 may, if desired, have
. the same numbered protrusions 50 as shown for element 60, the four
protrusions being disposed the same as for element 60.



SThe manner of constructing a retaining wall with the use of
slabs made in accordance with the present invention is described
hereinafter.



For the particular embodiment illustrated in the enclosed
10figures, each or a group of said elements 61, 62, or 63 may
sonstitute a distinct block for the construction of the retaining
` wall. Thus, if a two-element block is necessary (usually for one
or more of the lower courses), the pre-cast slab S is broken along
the dummy grooves 31/34 or 32/35. If only one-element blocks are
; lS required, said pre-cast slab 5 is broken along both dummy grooves
;i 31/34 and 32/35. Finally, when half-element blocks are required
(at the ends or when making a corner), the slab 5 is broken along
grooves 32/35 and then again along grooves 33/36. The breakage of
the slab along the dummy grooves will create a rough surface 90 in
q~ .20 the plane perpendicular to said dummy grooves lines which will
provide a cut stone look.



Horizontal retention means 80 can be attached on the element
60 as shown in figures 1 and 4. These retention means 80 may be

~ 25 made of any appropriate material and are adapted to be attached to
jconnection pins 75 placed on the top face of element 60 and act as




,, :
.

132~26~
-8b-
tie backs when buried into the soil as shown in figure 4. However,
it is to be understood that any other type of retention means can
be used for the same purpose.



Pre-cast slabs made in accordance with the present invention
are useful for building retaining walls of up to 1.35 meter under
normal soil conditions in the case such blocks are 813mm x 610mm x
76mm. For higher walls or abnormal soil conditions, an engineer
should be consulted.




. r. .~
~.`




3j , . : ~ ' ' .

9132

:,
As with any retaining walls structure, it is important
that the wall rest on an appropriate foundation and that adequate
drainage be provided behind the wall.
The first step consists in excavating a trench in which
q the foundation material and one or more rows of blocks will be
placed. For example, the following trench characteristics may
be use in most normal situations:
WALL HEIGHT TRENCH DIMENSION NUMBER OF ROWS
D W OF BURIED BLOCKS

up to 750mm 225mm x 550mm
;ll 15 750 to 1350mm 300mm x 750mm 2
,, .
The trench and the excavated embankment are then
preferably covered with an appropriate geotextile to prevent the
~, smaller particles of soil from infiltrating and blocking the
drainage system.

Crushed stone (20mm or 0-20mm) is placed in the trench
` and compacted to act as a foundation for the retaining wall. A
drain is then placed in the rear portion of the trench and
J 25 connected to an existing drainage system.
:..
In order to increase the stability of the wall, it is
preferable that the lowermost course be made of a block
comprising two elements. However, for wall heights of up to
750mm, this is not an absolute requirement for most normal soil
conditions. The blocks should be staggered as any normal brick
work to increase the strength of the wall.
.,
3 The subsequent courses of the retaining wall may be
' 35 single-element blocks.




:. . . ~ .. - :.: .
:~, . . - . -
... ~................................... . .
: . . ,
,~'`',. ; ' ' '' . ,

1~2~6~

-10- ' '

SI~B CUTTING CHART
TY~ES OF ELEMENTS ALONG DUMMY GROOVE
lxlW + lx2W 31/34 32/35
- 5 3xlW 31/34 and 32/35
2xlW + 2 half element 31/34 32/35 and 33/36
The corners are constructed using half-element blocks 62A or

62B (see figure 6) obtained by breaking element 62 along grooves
33/36.

After the last row of blocks 60, 61, or 62 has been erected,
a top block on header 71 is placed on said last row. However,
alternatively, the elements 60 or 61 can also be used as a header
by removing the protrusions 55 with a chisel.
~î 1 5
While specific embodiments of this invention have been
illustrated in the accompanying drawings and described hereinabove,
it will be evident to those skilled in art that changes and
modifications may be made therein without departing from the
essence of this invention, as set forth in the appended claims.
' For example, in the preferred embodiment, the concrete slab was
designed to be divided into four (4) elements. However, it has to
be understood that said slab may comprise 3, 5 ~ 6 or more sub-
. elements depending on the needs.



, ~
!i .
~' ' .


i ~ , .



A,~ ,
S

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1993-11-16
(22) Filed 1989-08-31
(45) Issued 1993-11-16
Expired 2010-11-16

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1989-08-31
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1990-01-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1995-11-16 $100.00 1995-09-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1996-11-18 $100.00 1996-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1997-11-17 $100.00 1997-09-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1998-11-16 $150.00 1998-08-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 6 1999-11-16 $150.00 1999-10-15
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 7 2000-11-16 $150.00 2000-10-27
Registration of a document - section 124 $50.00 2001-08-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 8 2001-11-16 $150.00 2001-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 9 2002-11-18 $150.00 2002-09-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 10 2003-11-17 $200.00 2003-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 11 2004-11-16 $250.00 2004-10-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 12 2005-11-16 $250.00 2005-11-08
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 13 2006-11-16 $250.00 2006-10-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 14 2007-11-16 $250.00 2007-10-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 15 2008-11-17 $450.00 2008-10-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 16 2009-11-16 $450.00 2009-10-27
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
OLDCASTLE BUILDING PRODUCTS CANADA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
CASTONGUAY, BERTIN
GROUPE PERMACON INC.
RATTE, ALAIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1994-07-28 6 180
Claims 1994-07-28 2 60
Abstract 1994-07-28 1 22
Cover Page 1994-07-28 1 25
Description 1994-07-28 11 427
Representative Drawing 2002-02-22 1 10
Fees 2002-09-09 1 35
Fees 2000-10-27 1 45
Fees 2003-10-03 1 31
Fees 2001-10-19 1 46
Fees 2004-10-01 1 30
Fees 1998-08-31 1 44
Fees 1997-09-25 1 46
Fees 1999-10-15 1 43
Correspondence 2005-03-01 1 39
Correspondence 2005-03-09 1 23
Fees 2005-11-08 1 36
Prosecution Correspondence 1992-06-29 2 62
Prosecution Correspondence 1992-05-19 2 30
Examiner Requisition 1992-01-21 1 53
PCT Correspondence 1989-09-22 1 33
PCT Correspondence 1993-07-30 1 32
Fees 1996-10-25 1 42
Fees 1995-09-27 1 43