Language selection

Search

Patent 1330185 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1330185
(21) Application Number: 575697
(54) English Title: BRAIDED SUTURE
(54) French Title: SOUDURE TORSADEE
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 128/123
  • 167/324
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61B 17/04 (2006.01)
  • A61L 17/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KAPLAN, DONALD S. (United States of America)
  • HERMES, MATTHEW E. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: G. RONALD BELL & ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1994-06-14
(22) Filed Date: 1988-08-26
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
089,732 United States of America 1987-08-26
227,699 United States of America 1988-08-03

Abstracts

English Abstract


-22-

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A braided suture is provided which exhibits
perceptibly enhanced flexibility and hand as well as reduced
chatter and drag compared to these same characteristics in a
suture possessing substantially the same overall denier but
possessing significantly fewer sheath yarns and denier of
individual filaments than the braided suture herein.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-16-

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A braided suture of improved construction
wherein for a given range of overall suture denier, the
range of pick count, number of sheath yarns and denier of
individual filaments comprising a sheath yarn are related to
each other as follows:

Image


-17-

2. The braided suture of Claim 1 wherein for a
given overall suture denier, the range of pick count, number
of sheath yarns and denier of individual filaments
comprising a sheath yarn are related to each other as
follows:
Image
3. The braided suture of Claim 1 possessing a
core.


-18-
4. The braided suture of Claim 2 possessing a
core.
5. The braided suture of Claim 3 wherein the
overall suture denier and core denier are related to each
other as follows:

Image


-19-
6. The braided suture of Claim 5 wherein the
overall suture denier and core denier are related to each
other as follows:
Image
7. The braided suture of Claim 1 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a non-absorbable
material.

8. The braided suture of Claim 1 wherein the
non-absorbable material is cotton, silk, polyamide or
polyolefin.

9. The braided suture of Claim 1 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.


-20-

10. The braided suture of Claim 9 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from the
group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic acid
and lactide.
11. The braided suture of Claim 2 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.
12. The braided suture of Claim 11 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from the
group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic acid
and lactide.
13. The braided suture of Claim 3 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.
14. The braided suture of Claim 11 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from the
group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic acid
and lactide.
15. The braided suture of Claim 4 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.
16. The braided suture of Claim 15 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated in whole or in part from
a polymer derived at least in part from one or more monomers
selected from the group consisting of glycolic acid,
glycolide, lactic acid and lactide.
17. The braided suture of Claim 5 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.



-21-
18. The braided suture of Claim 17 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from
the group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic
acid and lactide.

19. The braided suture of Claim 6 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.

20. The braided suture of Claim 19 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from
the group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic
acid and lactide.

21. The braided suture of Claim 1 surface coated
with a composition enhancing one or more functional
properties of the suture.

22. The braided suture of Claim 1 containing at
least one medico-surgically useful substance.

23. The braided suture of Claim 3 wherein the
core is braided.

24. The braided suture of Claim 4 wherein the
core is braided.

25. A braided suture according to claim 23 or 24,
comprising a braided sheath and a braided core.

26. The braided suture of Claim 25 wherein
individual filaments are fabricated from a non-absorbable
material.


-22-
27. The braided suture of Claim 26 wherein the
non-absorbable material is cotton, silk, polyamide or
polyolefin.

28. The braided suture of Claim 25 wherein
individual filaments are fabricated from a bio-absorbable
polymer.

29. The braided suture of Claim 28 wherein the
individual filaments are fabricated from a polymer derived
at least in part from one or more monomers selected from
the group consisting of glycolic acid, glycolide, lactic
acid and lactide.

30. The braided suture of Claim 25 surface coated
with a composition enhancing one or more functional
properties of the suture.

31. The braided suture of Claim 25 containing at
least one medico-surgically useful substance.

32. The braided suture of Claim 25 exhibiting at
least one of improved flexibility, improved hand, reduced
chatter and reduced drag compared with braided sutures of
known construction.

33. The braided suture of Claim 25 possessing a
significantly greater number of sheath yarns for a given
overall denier than braided sutures of known construction.

34. The braided suture of Claim 25 being
fabricated from individual filaments of finer denier than
filaments which are typical of known types of braided
sutures.



-23-
35. The braided suture of Claim 25 possessing a
greater pick count than braided sutures of known
construction.

36. The braided suture of Claim 25 exhibiting far
fewer surface discontinuities and thereby being
considerably smoother than braided sutures of known
construction.

37. The braided suture of Claim 25 wherein the
core constitutes a larger proportion of overall suture
denier than a core of a known braided suture.

38, The braided suture of Claim 25 wherein the
overall suture denier and core denier are related to each
other as follows:

Image
39. The braided suture of Claim 38 wherein the
overall suture denier and core denier are related to each
other as follows:


-24-

Image


Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


3 ~
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a braided suture of
improved construction.
Sutures intended for the repair of body tissues
must meet certain requirements: they must be substantially
non-toxic, capable of being readily sterilized, they must
have good tensile strength and have acceptable knot-tying
and knot-holding characteristics and if the sutures are of
the absorbable or biodegradable variety, the absorption or
biodegradation of the suture must be closely controlled.
Sutures have been constructed from a wide variety
of materials including surgical gut, silk, cotton, a
polyolefin such as polypropylene, polyamide, polyglycolic
acid, polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate and ~ -
glycolide-lactide copolymer, etc. Although the optimum
structure of a suture is that of a monofilament, since
certain materials of construction would provide a stiff
monofilament suture lacking acceptable knot-tying and knot-
holding properties, sutures manufactured from such
materials are preferably provided as braided structures.
Thus, for example, sutures manufactured from silk,
polyamide, polyester and bio-absorbable glycolide-lactide
copolymer are usually provided as multifilament braids.
Commercial examples of such sutures include DEXON* (Davis
& Geck, Inc.,~ and VICRYL* (Ethicon, Inc.).

*Trade-marks


,
,
.
' .~b~ ' '
~ .

S~ .
i ~

-2- 133~ 8~

~ 1 Currently available braided suture products are
i acceptable in terms of their knot-tying and knot-holding
properties. However, as removed from the package, they tend
to be stiff and wiry and retain a "set" or "memory" such
that at the time of use, it is usually necessary for the
surgeon or assistant personnel to flex and stretch the
suture to make it more readily handible. Furthermore, the
surfaces of known sutures are perceptibly rough. Thus, if
one passes one's hand or fingers along the braid, surface
irregularities will be readily detected. The result of this
rough surface is that the suture will exhibit drag or
chatter as it is drawn through tissue, characteristics which
militate against smooth, neat, accurately placed wound
approximation so necessary to excellence in surgical
practice.
In the case of one braided suture now on the
market, due to the necessity of having to meet fiber
strength requirements while at the same time retaining ,i -
acceptable knot-tying and knot-holding properties, the ~l
20 suture is constructed from a greater amount of fiber and ; -
consequently is of larger diameter than the accepted industry
standard.
It is an object of this invention to provide a
braided suture of improved characteristics, specifically one : ; -
exhibiting greater flexibility, better hand and less chatter
and drag, than braided sutures of known construction. ~-
It is a particular object of the invention to 'i-~
provide a braided suture possessing a greater number of
sheath yarns, a finer denier for the individual filaments ~---
30 comprising an individual sheath yarn and a greater pick ~ ~ -
count for a suture of any given overall denier (crossovers
per linear inch).

'~
~ 35
,- ' - .

~.': ,~: ~';
.~ .

--3--
1 3 3 ~

1 It is still another object of the invention to
provide a braided absorbable suture possessing the aforesaid
improved characteristics.

SUMNARY OF THE INVENTION
By way of satisfying the foregoing objects as well
as other objects of the invention, there is provided in
accordance with this invention a braided suture of improved
construction possessing a significantly greater number of
sheath yarns for a given overall denier, said sheath yarns
being fabricated from individual filaments of finer denier
than filaments which are typical of known types of braided
suture, said improved suture exhibiting perceptibly improved
flexibility and hand and reduced chatter and drag compared
with braided sutures of known construction.
More particularly, in accordance with this
invention, a braided suture of improved construction is ! -:
provided wherein for a given range of overall suture denier, i.. --
the range of pick count, number of.sheath yarns and denier
of individual.filaments comprising a sheath yarn are related
to each other as follows:

Overall Number of Denier of
Suture Pick Sheath Individual
Denier Count Yarns Filaments
~-:......... .
from about 50 from about 50 from about 4 from about 0.2
to about 125 to about 100 to about 16to about 1.8 . .
greater than from about 50 from about 4 from about 0.2
about 125 to to about 100 to about 16 to about 1.8
about 200 .
:
greater than from about 50 from about 4 from about 0.2 . - -
about 200 to to about 100 to about 16to about 1.8 ~.
about 300

- . ...
.` '' ~

~ i?.

~4~ 1 3 ~ S


l Overall Number of Denier o'
Suture Pick Sheath Individual
Denier Count Yarns Filaments
~-,
greater than from about 50 from about 10 from about 0.2
about 300 to to about 100 to about 20 to about 1.8
about 500
greater than from about 50 from about 14 from about 0.2
about 500 to to about 100 to about 20 to about 1.8 ~ -
about 800 -
greater than from about 50 from about 16 from about 0.2 ~ I
about 800 to to about 100 to about 32 to about 1.8
about 1200 t~
greater than from about 50 from about 20 from about 0.2
about 1200 to to about 100 to about 36 to about 1.8 ; - -
about 2000 ;
greater than from about 50 from about 20 from about 0.2 - :
about 2000 to to about 200 to about 36 to about 1.8
about 4000
As a result of its possessing a greater number of i-
sheath yarns for a suture of given overall denier and in ! ~
20 some cases, pick count, and together with the finer denier ~ -
o~ the filaments making up a sheath yarn, the braided suture
of the present invention exhibits far fewer surface --
discontinuities thereby providing a suture which is
considerably smoother than braided sutures of known
construction.
The term "suture" is intended to embrace both the
non-absorbable as well as the bio-absorbable varieties.
The term "braid" or "braided" as applied to the
suture of this invention refers to an arrangement of
I discrete units, or bundles, denominated "sheath yarns", made ~-
up cf individual filaments with individual sheath yarns
interlocking or interlacing each other in a regular
criss-cross pattern.
.: . . .
. . .
-
- '`:.. ' -

'.' !
. . . :
.

133018~

- 5 -

The term "pick count" refers to the number of
crossovers of sheath yarns per linear inch of suture and,
together with the overall denier of the suture, the denier
of the individual filaments constituting a sheath yarn and
the number of sheath yarns employed, defines the principal
construction characteristics of the braided suture herein.
The braided suture of this invention can
optionally possess, in addition to the braided structure
itself, a core component around which the braid is
constructed. In the case of this embodiment, it is
preferred that the core constitute a larger proportion of
overall suture denier than the core component of a known
braided suture.
The invention will now be described with reference
to the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a photomicrograph (200x) of a cross-
sectional view of a comparison suture outside the scope of
~ 20 the present invention:
; FIG. 2 is a photomicrograph (50x) of a linear view
of the suture of FIG. l;
F~G. 3 is a photomicrograph S200x) of a cross- -~
sectional view of a suture within the scope of the present
invention; and
` FIG. 4 is a photomicrograph (50x) of a linear view
of the suture of FIG. 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS -~
In a preferred embodiment, the braided suture of
the present invention is fabricated from a bio-absorbable
or biodegradable resin such as one derived from
polyglycolic acid, glycolide, lactic acid, lactide,
dioxanone, trimethylene carbonate, etc., and various
combinations of these and related monomers. Sutures
35 prepared from resins of this type are known in the art, ~ i -
e.g., as disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 2,668,162; -~
2,703,316; 2,758,987; 3,225,766; 3,297,033; 3,422,181;

~- 1 3 ~ 0 1 8 3
- 5a -

3,531,561; 3,565,077; 3,565,869; 3,620,218; 3,626,948;
3,636,956; 3,736,646; 3,772,420; 3,773,919; 3,792,010;
3,797,499; 3,839,297; 3,867,190; 3,878,284; 3,982,543;
4,047,533; 4,060,089; 4,137,921; 4,157,437; 4,234,775;
4,237,920; 4,300,565; and, 4,523,591; U.K. Patent No.
779,291; D.K. Gilding et al., "Biodegradable polymers for
use in surgery -- polyglycolic/poly(lactic acid) homo- and
co-polymers: 1, Polvmer, Volume 20, pages 1459-1464
(1979), and D.F. Williams (ed.), Biocompatibility of
Clinical Imlant Materials, Vol. II, ch.9: "Biodegradable
Polymers" (1981).




' ,..

133~8~ ~

1 The defining characteristics of the braided suture
of this invention, apart from the material of its
construction, are:
(1) overall suture denier;
(2) the pattern of the interlocking yarns
expressed as the pick count, which is to say,
the number of crossovers of individual sheath
yarns per linear inch of suture;
(3) the number of sheath yarns comprising the -
braid;
(4) the denier of the ;ndividual filaments
comprising each sheath yarn; and,
(5) the denier of the core, where present.
(1) Overall Denier of the Suture
The overall denier of the braided suture can vary
from about 50 to about 4000. Within this range, the ranges
of overall denier for particular sutures are: from about 50
to about 125 denier; from above about 125 to about 200 ¦ -
denier; from above about 200 to about 300 denier; from above
about 300 to about 500 denier; from above about 500 to about ;-~
800 denier; from above about 800 to about 1500 denier; from
above about 1500 to about 2000 denier; and, from above about `
~ 2000 to about 3600 denier.
`~ (2) Pattern of the Interlockin~ Sheath Yarns rPick Count)
`~ 25 For a suture of any range of overall denier, pick
count can vary from about 50 to about 100 crossovers/inch with
about 55-80 crossovers/inch being preferred. For sutures - ~
constructed within any range of overall denier, as larger -- - -
~` numbers of sheath yarns are employed, the pick-count for
r 30 acceptable sutures will also increase within the above ranges.



~ ~ 35

.. `.:. ...


:: . . - . ~; . .

-7_
13 3 ~

1 For a suture of a particular range of denier and
number of sheath yarns, pick count is advantageously
established to achieve a balance in the properties desired. In
general, with increasing pick count, surface roughness of the
5 suture tends to increase and with decreasing pick count, the -
ability of the external braided sheath to contain the core (if
present) tends to decrease even reaching the point where the
braid may become so loose as to result in the core protruding
therethrough.
For sutures of any specific denier range and number
of sheath yarns, it is preferable to have as low a pick count
as possible in order to achieve optimum surface smoothness,
consistent, of course, with the need to provide a compact braid
which prevents the core (if present) from protruding through -
the exterior sheath yarn structure.
(3) The Number of Sheath Yarns
The number of sheath yarns bears some relation to :- -
overall suture denier, the number generally increasing with -
the weight of the suture. Thus, across the range of suture
weight (denier) indicated above,the braided suture of this
invention can be constructed with from about 4 up to as many as
about 36 individual sheath yarns constructed from individual
filaments having the deniers discussed below. ` ~ -
Table I below sets forth broad and preferred
25 ranges for the numbers of sheath yarns which are suitable !- -
for the construction of braided sutures of various ranges of
overall denier.~ The pick counts of the sutures vary from -~
about 50 to about 100 and deniers of individual filaments i`
vary from about 0.2 to about 1.8 for the broad range of ,-;
number of sheath yarns and the pick counts vary from about
55 to about 80 and the deniers of individual filaments vary -
from about 0.8 to about 1.4 for the preferred range of
number of sheath yarns.


` . .

,.':.: .

. .




. ' .`: `, . ", . . ,. .. ` . ,. . ,.. ~ . ,-- .` .. , . `. f j . ~ .

-8- 1 3 3 ~ 1 8 3


1 Table I: Sheath Yarns Related to Suture Denier
Number of Number of
Overall Suture Suture Sheath Yarns Sheath Yarns
Denier Size (Broad Range) (Preferred Range)

50 to about 125 7/0,8/0 4-16 6-14
greater than about
125 to about 200 6/0 4-16 6-14 -~-
greater than about - .
200 to about 300 .5/0 4-16 6-14
greater than about . -
300 to about 500 4/0 10-20 12-14 ~ :
greater than about .
500 to about 800 3/0 14-20 14-18 -
greater than about
800 to about 1200 2/0 18-32 20-30
greater than about i
~ 1200 to about 2000 0 20-36 24-34
- grsater than about -~ . - -~.. -.
`~ 2000 to about 4000 1,2 20-36 24-34 !...... .~.. : :.
~:~ While the ~heath yarns need not be twisted, it is i. ;
generally preferred that they be provided with a twist so as
:~ to minimize snagging during braid construction. i~
(4) Individual Filament Denier
The individual filaments comprising each sheath ! -
yarn can vary in weight from about 0.2 to about 1.8 denier .
and preferably from about 0.8 to about 1.4 denier. The
number of such filaments present in a particular sheath yarn '
will depend on the overall denier of the suture as well as ;~
~ 30 the nur~er of sheath yarns utlli~ed in tho construction of `



_ 35

,. ., ,;,,
~ " ~
:,., - ~,' --: ~

- 9 -
133~

1 the suture. Table II sets forth some typical numbers ~f
filaments per sheath yarn f~r both the broad and preferred
ranges of filament weight:
¦ 5 Table II: Number of Filaments ~er Sheath Yarn
! approximate approximate Filament
I minimum maximum Denier
,
j 45 450 0.2
150 0.5
1.5
3 40 1.8
(5) Core (O~tional~
For all but the lowest range of overall denier,
the braided suture herein can optionally be constructed
around a filamentous c~re which itself can be braided or
which can be provided in some other configuration such as a
twist, ply, cable, etc. The filament(s) comprising the core
20 need not be as fine as those comprising the sheath yarns. ~
It is particularly advantageous for sutures of heavier - : -
denier to possess a core. Where a core is provided, it is
generally preferred that it possess a weight which is
significantly greater than that of a core of a known suture
of equivalent overall denier.
,,,




` ' , ' . .~.:
.` '


' .


--10--
- 133~
1 Table III below provides some typical core deniers
for sutures of various deniers.

Table III: co~e Denier Related to Suture Denier
Denier of Denier of . .- ~ :
Overall Suture Suture Optional Core optional Core ::
Denier Size (Broad Range) tPreferred Range)
.
from about 50 to
about 125 8/0,7/o none none
' , ::-
greater-than about . .
125 to about 200 6/9 20-8Q 25-50
greater than about -
200 to about 300 5/0 30-100 50-80
greater than about -
300 to about 500 4/0 80-50 80-12
greater than about
500 to about 800 3/0 150-300 180-280
. greater than about
800 to about 1200 2/0 250-700 350-650
greater than about `.
1200 to about 2000 0 400-1200 500-1000
greater than about --~
2000 to about 40001,2 800-2400 1000-2200
It can be advantageous to apply one or more :~
~ coating compositions to the braided suture of this invention
;; to improve such properties as surface lubricity and knot .`-~
tie-down behavior.- A variety of suture coating compositions
;~ proposed for either or both purposes is known in the art,
30 e.g., those disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,047,S33



~ ~`-

~ :~


- ~ .

-11- 13 3 ~18 ~

l It is also within the scope of this invention to
impregnate the suture with, or otherwise apply thereto, one
or more medico-surgically useful substances, e.g., those
which accelerate or beneficially modify the healing process -
when the suture is applied to a wound or surgical site. SG,
for example, the braided suture herein can be provided with
a therapeutic agent which will be deposited at the sutured
site. The therapeutic agent can be chosen for its
antimicrobial properties, capability for promoting wound
repair and/or tissue growth or for specific indications such
as thrombosis. Antimicrobial agents such as broad spectrum
antibiotics (gentamycin sulphate, erythromycin or
derivatized glycopeptides) which are slowly released into
the tissue can be applied in this manner to aid in combating
clinical and sub-clinical infections in a surgical or trauma
wound site. To promote wound repair and/or tissue growth,
one or several growth promoting factors can be introduced
into the suture, e.g., fibroblast growth factor, bone growth
~- factor, epidermal growth factor, platelet derived growth
factor, macrophage derived grown factor, alveolar deri~ed
growth factor, monocyte derived growth factor, magainin, and
so forth. Some therapeutic indications are: glycerol with
tissue or kidney plasminogen activator to cause thrombosis,
superoxide dismutase to scavenge tissue damaging free -
` 25 radicals, tumor necrosis factor for cancer therapy or colony
stimulating factor and interferon, interleukin-2 or other
lymphokine to enhance the immune system. ~-
In the examples which follow, Comparison Examples
l to ll are illustrative of known type sutures while
Examples l to 12 are illustrative of sutures constructed n ; - ~ -
accordance with this invention. ~ ~
I . .' ' ',' ' .:
' ''.'''. ''~ . '

_ 35 _ ~;
~` , . ,
: .:
. ' '1'



r,.

~ 12- 13~185

1 ComPariSOn Exam~les 1-7 - -
The following braided suture configurations are
disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,565,077:

Overall Denier of . -- -~;
Comparison Suture Pick Number of Individual Denier
Example Denier Count Sheath Yarns Filaments of Core
'~' ,. ~:
1 175 40 6 6 25 ~ ;;:
2 300 46 8 6 100
3 500 40 8. 6 100
4 800 50 12 6 200 :
5 1200 50 16 6 400 .
6 1500 50 12 6 600 -
7 2000 40 16 6 800

.~ - Sutures possessing approximately these ,~
20 configu,rations are relatively inflexible, rough-surfaced and !~
`~ exhibit a relatively high level of chatter and drag.




~' ' 3 i ! , ~.


' ,', ': ' '"'`''~' '-
~ 35 _ . .: ~- .` .
:: ` ' ; ... :
~ ' , ' '.. ':~ ,' .
~ - ~, . .

~ Ls . ` ~ , ~

13 1 3 3 O ~ ~ !

1 Comparison ExamPles 8~
The following braided suture configurations are -
those of four commercially available sutures:

Number
Overall of Denier of Denier
Comparison Suture Suture Pick Sheath Individual of
Example Denier Size Count Yarns Filaments Core

8 259 5/0 47 8 2.1 29
9 698 3~0 52 12 2.1 55
1566 0 50 16 2.1 252
11 2122 1 44 16 2.2 330
'
Micrographs obtained by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) of the suture of Comparison Example 10
(Figures 1 and 2: cross-sectional view at 200x and linear
view at 50x, respectively) clearly show the structural ~
details of the suture. The suture braid is made up of j
- relatively few sheath yarns and the circumferential ,~~ 20 indentations, plainly evident in Figure 1, cause the braid
surface to be relatively rough.



~! ~ ...
" 1 ``-

;::
.

, - ~
.. .
;
-: 35 _ :
. ., `.
:: .

~ .

~ -14- 1 3 3 ~ 1 8 ~

1 Exam~les 1-8
These examples illustrate various size braided
sutures constructed in accordance with the present
invention.
~. .~.;-
Number . - -.-.--
Overall of Denier of D~nier .
Suture Su'_ure Pick Sheath Individual of . ~.
Example Denier Size Count Yarns Filaments Core
- ~:~'
1 96 7/o 828 1.2 --~
2 173 6/0 75'12 1.2 29 :~ .
3 240 5/O 658 1.2 48 : . -
4 389 4/o 7512 1.2 101
5 600 3/O 6516 1.2 216 - .
61080 2/0 7224 1.2 504
71378 0 6528 1.2 706
82028 1 6532 1.21260
l; ~ .'.s
Comparing the details of construction of the !~
~:~ 20 foregoing braided sutures with those of the known braided .
: sutures as set forth in Comparison Examples 1-11, it will be
noted that for sutures of comparable overall denier, the .. ... :.--
suture of this invention possesses a significantly greater
.~ pick count and number of sheath yarns and a significantly !` .
.~ 25 finer denier for.the individual filaments ma~ing up a sheath
yarn than the equivalent characteristics of the known
suture. ....
,~ As a result of their unique construction .. ~
; characteristics, the sutures of this.invention exhibit :." ,,., . .. .:
. .3o perceptibly improved flexibility and hand and reduced
chatter and drag compared with the known sutures of . .
.`:: Comparison Examples 1~

l . 35 .~
I : ~ .. ' ~. ,.j`-........... `,.
:

. -`...: . - . ....
~ . - -- . ,. - . . .

-15- 13391 8~
': !

1 Exam~les 9 - 12
The following braided sutures were fabricated in
accordance with the present invention:

Number
Overall of Denier of Denier
suture Suture Pick Sheath Individual of
Example Denier Size Count Yarns Filaments Core -
. -.
9 240 5/0 688 1.240
0 10 600 3/0 71 16 1.2 180
1374 0 67 ' 281.2 702
2 2230 1 5732 1.2 ' 975

In contxast to the suture of Comparison Example
10, su~ra, SEM micrographs of the suture of Example 11
(Figures 3 and 4: cross-6ectional view at 200X and linear
view at 50x, respectively) show a smooth circumferential
, surface as the result of the increased number of sheath j .
:~ yarns and smaller diameter of individual filaments.
Figure 1 as compared to Figure 3 sh~ws the .
; relatively larger core present in the suture of Example 11
as compared to that of Comparison Example 10.
Comparison between Figures 2 and 4 shows the
increased number of picks (crossovers/inch) of the suture of ~ :
: ;25 Example 11 as compared to that of Comparison Example 10. ,:
~ ~ i,"


~ .~. 30 ' - :
,: :

.
-- `

,. ,' ~ '
:

~: .

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1330185 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1994-06-14
(22) Filed 1988-08-26
(45) Issued 1994-06-14
Expired 2011-06-14

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1988-08-26
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-07-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 1996-06-14 $100.00 1996-05-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 3 1997-06-16 $100.00 1997-05-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 4 1998-06-15 $100.00 1998-05-28
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 5 1999-06-14 $150.00 1999-05-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 6 2000-06-14 $150.00 2000-05-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 7 2001-06-14 $150.00 2001-05-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 8 2002-06-14 $150.00 2002-05-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 9 2003-06-16 $150.00 2003-05-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 10 2004-06-14 $250.00 2004-05-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 11 2005-06-14 $250.00 2005-05-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 12 2006-06-14 $250.00 2006-05-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 13 2007-06-14 $250.00 2007-05-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 14 2008-06-16 $250.00 2008-05-20
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 15 2009-06-15 $450.00 2009-05-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 16 2010-06-14 $450.00 2010-05-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNITED STATES SURGICAL CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
HERMES, MATTHEW E.
KAPLAN, DONALD S.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1995-08-28 2 117
Claims 1995-08-28 9 597
Abstract 1995-08-28 1 27
Cover Page 1995-08-28 1 79
Description 1995-08-28 16 1,127
PCT Correspondence 1989-01-03 1 33
Office Letter 1989-03-31 1 15
PCT Correspondence 1993-08-13 1 25
PCT Correspondence 1993-07-30 1 32
Office Letter 1994-04-19 1 58
Prosecution Correspondence 1994-02-28 1 27
Prosecution Correspondence 1994-01-17 2 56
Prosecution Correspondence 1991-01-30 3 91
Examiner Requisition 1991-10-01 1 55
Fees 1996-05-16 1 36