Language selection

Search

Patent 1333452 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1333452
(21) Application Number: 1333452
(54) English Title: FABRY-PEROT INTERFEROMETER
(54) French Title: INTERFEROMETRE DE FABRY-PEROT
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01J 03/26 (2006.01)
  • G02B 06/38 (2006.01)
  • G02B 26/02 (2006.01)
  • G02B 26/04 (2006.01)
  • G02B 26/08 (2006.01)
  • G02F 01/21 (2006.01)
  • H01S 03/10 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MALLINSON, STEPHEN ROBERT (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: G. RONALD BELL & ASSOCIATES
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1994-12-13
(22) Filed Date: 1986-10-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
85 26189 (United Kingdom) 1985-10-23

Abstracts

English Abstract


A Fabry-Perot interferometer comprises a single
crystal silicon substrate (1) with an integrally formed
diaphragm (6) supported between walls (2-5). A glass
superstrate (14) is mounted adjacent the substrate (1)
with a spacer (13) sandwiched therebetween. Facing
surfaces (12,16) of the diaphragm (6) and superstrate
(14) are polished and suitably coated to define
reflective surfaces and the position of the diaphragm may
be altered to vary the response of the interferometer.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A Fabry-Perot interferometer having two
reflective surfaces in which one of the reflective surfaces
is provided on a diaphragm mounted by a hinge assembly to
a support wherein the diaphragm and the hinge assembly are
integral with the support, and the support, diaphragm and
hinge assembly are made from a single crystal.
2. An interferometer according to claim 1,
wherein the crystal is silicon.
3. An interferometer according to claim 1,
further comprising control means responsive to control
signals to cause the diaphragm to move relatively to the
support towards and away from the other reflective surface.
4. An interferometer according to claim 3,
wherein the control means comprises a pair of electrodes
for connection in a control circuit for generating an
electrostatic field.
5. An interferometer according to claim 1 or 2,
wherein the other reflective surface is formed on a
superstrate adjacent a substrate on which the diaphragm is
formed.
6. An interferometer according to claim 5,
wherein a spacer is positioned between the substrate and
superstrate.
7. An interferometer according to claim 5,
wherein the superstrate comprises glass.
8. An interferometer according to claim 1 or 2,
wherein the hinge assembly comprises four bridges defining
an aperture of substantially square cross-section within
which the diaphragm is suspended.

9. An interferometer according to claim 5,
further comprising control means responsive to control
signals to cause the diaphragm to move relatively to the
support towards and away from the other reflective surface.
10. A method of modulating a beam of radiation,
the method comprising causing the beam to impinge on a
Fabry-Perot interferometer according to claim 1 or 2 and
causing the diaphragm to oscillate between two positions in
response to control signals, whereby in one position the
beam is transmitted through the interferometer while in the
other position the beam is not transmitted.
11. A Fabry-Perot interferometer comprising:
a first partially reflective member;
a second partially reflective member disposed
parallel to the first member and adjustably disposed with
respect thereto so as to permit variable dimensioning of an
optical Fabry-Perot interferometer cavity formed
therebetween; and
an at least partially transparent electrode means
disposed on each of the reflective members for
electrostatically controlling the variable dimensioning as
a function of an electrical signal impressed across the
electrode means.
12. An interferometer according to claim 11,
wherein the second partially reflective member comprises a
single crystal substrate having a reflective diaphragm
integrally and hingedly connected within a central aperture
to outer surrounding walls.
13. An interferometer according to claim 12,
wherein the first partially reflective member comprises a
superstrate bonded to the walls and located opposite the
diaphragm.

14. An interferometer according to claim 13,
wherein the superstrate is bonded to the walls via an
intermediately located spacer.
15. An interferometer according to claim 11,
further comprising an electrical contact pad electrically
connected to each of the electrodes and also electrically
connected to control the variable dimensioning in response
to provided control signals.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1333~2
FABRY-PEROT INTERFEROMETER
The invention relates to Fabry-Perot
interferometers.
A typical Fabry-Perot interferometer comprises a
pair of substantially parallel reflective surfaces which
are spaced apart to define a gap, at least one cf the
surfaces being movable relatively to the other to vary
the size of the gap. In use, radiation comprising a
number of different wavelengths impinses on the
interferometer and passes into the gap and is then
reflected between the two reflective surfaces.
Constructive and destructive interference takes place
leading to certain well definec wavelengths being
transmitted through the interferometer while the
remaining wavelengths are not transmitted. In typical
Fabry-Perot interferometers a series of well defined
transmission peaks are obtained corresponding to
wavelengths which are transmitted, the wavelengths at
which the peaks are situated being adjustable by varying
the width of the gap.
Fabry-Perot interferometers have been used to
large extent to define laser cavities but also finc
widespread use as multiple wavelength filters.
It is important that the reflective surfaces of the
interferometer are as parallel as possible and it is also
desirable to be able to char.ge the separation between the
reflective surfaces over a wide range.
The most common form of Fabry-Perot interferometer
currently in use comprises two glass flats securely
mounted on G stable support with facing surfaces of the
flats being highly polished and having suitable coatings
to define the reflective surfaces. The size of the gap
may vary between one millimetre and several centimetres
anZ is varied by using microadjusters and/or
piezoelectric translation elements. This is a cumbersome

1333152
and expensive arrangement and has a relatively large
overall size, typically in the order of inches.
Another form of Fabry-Perot interferometer comprises
a single solid glass flat, the opposite faces of which
are polished and suitably coated to define the reflective
surfaces. The only practical way in which the spacing or
gap between the surfaces can be changed is by heating the
flat to cause thermal expansion. This construction
suffers from the disadvantage that the variation in
separation obtair.able is small and the disadvantage that
it is very difficult to obtain accurately parallel
surfaces.
In accordance with the present invention, in a
Fabry-Perot interferometer one of the reflective surfaces
is provided on a diaphragm ~lounted by a hinge assembly to
a support.
This invention improves upon the known
interferometers by making use of a diaphragm to provide
one of the reflective surfaces and mounting the diaphragm
by a hinge assembly to a support so that the position of
the diaphragm can be easily changed. This enables the
size of the gap to be eas~ly and rapidly changed. For
example, the interferometer can be used to demultiplex an
incoming wavelength divisicn multiplexed signal in which
a number of different channels are carried by different
wavelength signals. In this application, it is often
necessary to retune rapidly from one channel to another
and this can easily be achieved using an interferometer
according to the invention.
Preferably, the diaphragm and the hinge assembly are
intesral with the support. This leads to a compact and
secure construction which is much cheaper to manufacture
than known devices and involves far fewer components.
Convenientiy, a single crystal such as silicon is
- 35 used for the support, diaphragm and hinge assembly. This

1 ~ 3 ~ 1 5 2
is particularly advantageous since conventional
micromachining techniques such as anisotropic etching can
be used to form the hinge assembly and diaphragm. Such
techniques include masking and etching and laser etching.
(It is also believed that these techniques will enable
the orientation of the reflective surfaces to be
accurately controlled thus making it easier to arrange
the one reflective surface parallel with the other.)
The interferometer may further comprise control
means responsive to control signals to cause the
diaphrag~, to move relatively to the support towards and
away from the other reflective surface. The contrGl
means may comprise a pair of electrodes for connection in
to a control circuit for generating an electrostatic
field wherein the position of the diaphragm correspcnds
to the strength of the field.
The interferometer could be used as a pressure
sensor due to the sensitive mounting arrangement of the
diaphragm. For example pressure changes due to acoustic
2~ fields would cause the diaphragm to oscillate thus
modulating a sing e wavelength incident Gptical wave.
This would fir.c application in microphones and
hydrophones.
Typically, the other reflective surface may be
provided on a facing surface of a superstrate positioned
adjacent the substrate. The superstrate may conver.iently
be formed of glass.
Preferably, the superstrate and substrate are
connected together via an intermediate spacer layer since
this will form a compact constructior..
As has previously been mentioned, the interferometer
may be used to demultiplex a wavelength division
multiplexed signal or to define a laser cavity. In the
latter case, a suitable gain medium would be positioned
between the reflective surfaces.

1333~52
Another application for which interferometers
according to the invention are particularly applicable is
in the construction of an optical beam modulator. The
use of a diaphragm enables the size of the separation of
the reflective surfaces to be rapidly changed, for
example at kilohertz rates. If a single wavelength beam
is incider.t on the interferometer, this can be modulated
by moving the diaphragm between two positions at one of
which the beam is transmitted and at the other of which
the beam is not transmitted.
In another application, the interferometer can be
used as a wavelength switch when beams of radiation
centred on two different wavelengths are incident on the
interferometer. ~y suitably choosing the size of the
gap, it can be arranged that one wavelength is
trznsmitted while the other is back reflected.
An example of a Fabry-Perot interferometer according
to the invention will now be described with reference to
the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a cross-section; and,
Figure 2 is a plan; and,
Figures 3 anc 4 illustrate the performance of the
interferometer with two different gzps.
The interferometer shown in Figures 1 and 2
comprises a sinsle crystal silicon substrate 1 having
four integral walls 2-5 forming a square. A diaphragm 6
is suspended fro~ upper portions of the walls 2-5 within
a central aperture 7 by a hinge assembly comprising four
bridges 8-11 each having a typical length in the range
1-5 mm. The hinge assembly is integral with both the
substrate 1 and the diaphragm 6. This structure is
formed by anisotropically etching the substrate 1. A
semi-reflective coating 12 is providea on a polished
upper surface of the diaphragm 6.

1333152
A spacer layer 13 having a typical thickness in the
range 5-50 ~m is grown around the perimeter of the
substrate 1 and a glass superstrate 14 is bonded to the
spacer layer 13. An air gap 15 is defined between the
superstrate 14 and the substrate 1. A portion 16 of the
surface of the superstrate 14 facing the diaphragm 6 is
polished and coated with a reflective coating to define a
secon2 reflective surface.
A pair of transparent electrodes are coated on the
surfaces 6, 16 and are connected to a control circuit
(not shown). Suitable electrodes may be made from Indiu~
Tin Oxide. One electrode is indicated at 17 coupled with
a cor.tact pad 18. In a modification (not shown) one
electrode could be on the surface of the diaphragm
opposite the surface 6.
In use, a beam of radiation impinges on either the
glass superstrate 14 or the underside of the diaphragm 6
and passes into the air gap 15. Internal reflection of
the beam takes place in the air gap 15 due to the
reflective surfaces 12, 16 resulting in constructive and
destructive interference of the different wavelengths in
the incoming beam. The result of this is that certain
beams of very narrow bandwidth are transmitted through
the air gap into the opposing substrate or superstrate
while the majority of the wavelengths are back reflected.
The size of the air gap 15 (ie. the distance between
the reflective surfaces 12, 16) can be adjusted by
varying the electrostatic field generated between the
electrodes. This causes movement of the diaphragm 6
3Q relatively to the remainder of the substrate 1. A change
in the size of the air gap causes a change in the
wavelengths which are transmitted.
The use of a single crystal as the substrate is
particularly advantageous, as previously mentioned, since
the walls 2-4, diaphragm 6, and bridges 8-11 can be

6 I33~
integrally formed by conventional micromachining
techniques. This leads to a very cheap product compared
with previous interferometers and also enables small air
gaps to be defined. It should be noted that the
interferometer would need no adjustment or setting up
since the cavity gap would be defined during manufacture.
If desired, the size of the gap can be monitored by
providing capacitor plates on the facing surfaces cf the
superstrate 14 and the bridge 6 and monitorins the
capacitance between the plates. This could very ~imply
be achieved by making use of the electrodes as capacitor
plates while a voltage is applied between them.
Furthermore, due to their small size, a nu~ber of
Fabry-Perot interferometers could be fabricated onto a
single wafer which would be particularly useful in
optical communication fields.
~ igures 3 and 4 illustrate graphically examples of
the transmission characteristics of the interferometer
with gaps of 12~m and 48~m respectively. In each case
the reflectivity of the facing surfaces is 0.8 although
it could be as high as 0.999.
The device may find application, inter alia, as
wavelength selective element in long external cavity lasers.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-12-15
Letter Sent 2002-12-13
Grant by Issuance 1994-12-13

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (category 1, 3rd anniv.) - standard 1997-12-15 1997-11-12
MF (category 1, 4th anniv.) - standard 1998-12-14 1998-11-16
MF (category 1, 5th anniv.) - standard 1999-12-13 1999-11-15
MF (category 1, 6th anniv.) - standard 2000-12-13 2000-11-17
MF (category 1, 7th anniv.) - standard 2001-12-13 2001-11-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
STEPHEN ROBERT MALLINSON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-05-13 1 7
Abstract 1994-12-12 1 16
Claims 1994-12-12 3 91
Description 1994-12-12 6 251
Drawings 1994-12-12 2 33
Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-01-12 1 174
Fees 1996-11-12 1 55
Prosecution correspondence 1987-03-11 1 22
Prosecution correspondence 1990-03-28 2 35
Prosecution correspondence 1994-01-23 2 41
PCT Correspondence 1994-09-13 1 22
Examiner Requisition 1993-09-23 2 62
Examiner Requisition 1989-11-29 1 32
Courtesy - Office Letter 1987-02-16 1 10