Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
-1- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
REMO~AL OF BITTERNESS FROM CITRUS JUICES USING A
POST-CROSSLINKED ADSORBENT RESIN
The present invention relates to certain
adsorbent resins and a method of using such to remove
bitter components from citrus fruit juices,
particularly navel orange juices.
The bitterness in ci~rus juices is derived from
bitter components such as flavanoids, predominantly
naringin, and/or limonoids and their precursors,
predominantly limonin. The presence of bitterness is
often accentuated by processing of the fruit to juice
or juice concentrate. For example, limonin is formed
from its non-bitter precursor limonoic a-ring lactone,
which is initially present in the albedo of citrus
fruits. The formation of limonin from its precursor
takes place in the presence of an acidic environment or
upon heating. Therefore, processes of juice
extraction, heat pasteurization and concentration, and
storage of juice or concentrate result in limonin
induced bitterness, especially in early season orange,
navel orange and lemon juices. Thus, it would be
desirable to have a process for removing bitterness
35,181A-F -1-
~k
-2- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
from juice. Limonin levels in excess of 6 parts per
million (ppm) are detectable as bitterness by most of
the population, 20 percent of the population can detect
levels down to 2 ppm.
- U.S. Patent 4,514,427 discloses debittering and
reducing the acidity of grapefruit juice by contacting
the grapefruit juice with a weak base anion exchange
resin in the freebase form. When processing many
juices such as orange juice using this process, the
anion exchange resin in the freebase form adsorbs a
large amount of the citric acid in the juice, which
causes the pH of the juice to become basic. The
increase in pH of the juice may cause the denaturing of
the proteins present in the juice and result in an
inferior quality juice. In addition, these denatured
proteins can form small gellular masses which embed
themselves in the resin. The result is excess pressure
buildup within the resin vessel which leads to
premature work stoppage. The denatured proteins are
very difficult to remove from the resin, thereby
resulting in excessive resin replacement costs.
Another problem with the anion exchange resin used in
the above-described process is that it does not have a
large enough capacity to remove enough bitter
components to get below the consumer threshold level of
6 ppm in a single passage. Furthermore, if the weak
base resin is not used in its freebase form, the weak
3 base resin's capacity for bitter components is
unacceptably low.
U.S. Patent 4,439,458 discloses debittering
citrus fruit juice by contacting the clarified juice
(i.e., juice with the pulp removed by passing the juice
through a centrifuge) with a polystyrene adsorbent
35,181A-F -2-
_3_ 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
copolymer, crosslinked with divinylbenzene. After
contact with the adsorbent, the clarified citrus juice
is recombined with the pulp. The problem with the
above-described process is that although some of the
bitter taste is removed, the limonin precursor is still
present in the untreated pulp. Thus, the juice still
has somewhat of a bitter taste, especially after
subsequent processing. Another problem with the
process described above is that prior to contact with a
juice the adsorbent copolymer must be pretreated with
a water-soluble alcohol to extract any residual
monomers such as, divinylbenzene for the copolymer. At
the present time, the juice plants are not equipped to
handle flammable liquids in their plants, and to
install such equipment would probably be cost
prohibitive.
It would be desirable to provide an efficient
and commercially viable process for selectively
removing bitter components such as, limonin or naringin
or its precursors from citrus fruit juices. This would
provide for more complete removal of bitterness from
the juices.
The present invention is a process for removing
bitter components such as, limonin, naringin or their
precursors from citrus fruit juices, particularly navel
orange juice.
3o
The method comprises contacting the citrus
juice containing the bitter components with an
adsorbent resin. The adsorbent resin is prepared by
contacting a copolymer in a swollen state with a
Friedel-Crafts catalyst under conditions effective to
catalyze the post-crosslinking and rearrangement of the
35,181A-F -3-
4 1 333672
swollen copolymer. The contact is maintained for a
time sufficient to reduce the level of bitter
components, such as naringin, limonin or their
precursors in the citrus juice. The adsorbent resin is
derived from a copolymer of a monoethylenically
unsaturated monomer and a crosslinking monomer,
preferably the copolymer is a styrene and
divinylbenzene copolymer. In a preferred embodiment,
the copolymer is chloromethylated and then post-
-crosslinked to make the adsorbent resin.
The present invention provides a surprisingly
effective method for debittering citrus fruit juices
using an adsorbent resin which has good physical
stability under the conditions of treatment. The resin
can be easily regenerated with basic solutions and thus
does not require the use of pretreatment with alcohol.
The present invention minimizes the change in the
citrus juices pH, even if the adsorbent resin is
pretreated with a basic solution, therefore denaturing
of the proteins in the juice does not occur. In
addition to removing the bitter components, the
invention provides an effective means of removing the
bitter components, while not removing a substantial
amount of the citric acid from the citrus juice.
The invention herein is a process of
debittering citrus juices and in another respect the
invention is also a process of debittering citrus
juices, while not removing a substantial amount of
citric acid from the juice. Generally, the process
comprises the step of contacting the juice with an
effective amount of an adsorbent resin for a time
35,181A-F -4-
-5- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
period sufficient to remove the bitter components from
the juice.
These adsorbent resins are derived from
crosslinked copolymers that have been post-crosslinked
in the swollen state in the presence of a
Friedel-Crafts catalyst and functionalized with
hydrophilic groups. These post-crosslinked copolymers
can be gellular, or macroporous. Preferably, the
copolymers are macroporous.
The copolymers are derived from crosslinked
copolymers of (1) a polyunsaturated monomer, containing
a plurality of non-conjugated CH2=C< groups, which acts
as a crosslinking agent, and (2) a monoethylenically
unsaturated monomer. At least one of the
polyunsaturated and monoethylenically unsaturated
monomers is aromatic, and preferably both are aromatic,
provided that at least a major portion (at least
50 percent by weight based o~ the total weight of
monomers used) is aromatic.
Preferably, the monoethylenically unsaturated
monomer is a monovinyl aromatic monomer. Monovinyl
aromatic monomers include styrene and its derivatives,
such as ortho-, meta- and para-methyl styrenes, and
ortho-, meta-, and para-ethyl styrenes; vinyltoluene;
ethylvinylbenzene; vinylnaphthalene; vinylbenzyl
chloride and vinylbenzyl alcohol. Crosslinking
monomers broadly encompass the polyvinylidene compounds
listed in U.S. Patent 4,382,124. Preferred
polyunsaturated crosslinking monomers are
divinylbenzene (commercially available divinylbenzene
containing less than 45 weight percent
ethylvinylbenzene), trivinylbenzene, and ethylene
35,181A-F -5-
' 333672
--6--
glycol diacrylate and the like. Other suitable
aliphatic polyunsaturated monomers can include
divinylsulfide and such similar compounds. While
hydrocarbon monomers are preferred, the crosslinking
monomers may also include heterocyclic compounds such
as divinylpyridine.
For crosslinking, sufficient amounts of the
polyunsaturated monomer will be used to give
dimensional stability to the copolymers so that it will
swell rather than dissolve in the subsequent swelling
steps. The amount of crosslinking required will depend
on the copolymers porosity characteristics desired.
The percent crosslinking prior to post-crosslinking is
based on the percent weight of the copolymers which is
attributable to the polyunsaturated monomer. The
crosslinker serves to increase the physical stability
of the adsorbent resin. The amount of crosslinker
required depends significantly on the process
conditions used to prepare the copolymer and can range
anywhere from 1 to 45 percent by weight of total
monomer, preferably from 4 to 8 percent by weight. The
suitable amounts of the cross-linker required when
making a gellular copolymer bead is from 0.25 to
15 percent, preferably from 1 to 10 percent by weight
of total monomer.
The preferred macroporous copolymer is a
copolymer of up to 99.75 weight percent styrene with
the balance divinylbenzene. Another preferred
macroporous copolymer is a copolymer of 40 to 60 weight
percent styrene, 40 to 60 weight percent vinylbenzyl
chloride and 1 to 20 weight percent divinylbenzene.
The macroporous copolymers may contain minor amounts of
other monomers, such as the esters of acrylic and
35,181A-F -6-
1 333672
methacrylic acid, and acrylonitrile. When commercial
grades of divinylbenzene are used, from 5 to 50 weight
percent of the divinylbenzene is ethylvinylbenzene, and
it is conventional to include the ethylvinylbenzene
with the styrene or other monovinyl monomer when
specifying the proportion of styrene or other monovinyl
monomer.
Generally, these copolymers can be prepared by
suspension polymerization of the monomer composition
under conditions conventionally used to prepare ion
exchange resins, in the presence of one or more
porogenic diluents using quantities sufficient ~o cause
phase separation of the prepared copolymer from the
diluent. Conventional methods of suspension
polymerization of the monomers are well known in the
art and described in Ion Exchange by F. Helfferich,
published in 1962 by McGraw-Hill Book Company, N.Y..
Further, U.S. Patents 4,419,242; 4,564,644 and
4,444,961 illustrate methods of suspension
polymerization. Although, it should be noted that
there are many other polymerization techniques known in
the art for preparing copolymers which could be useful
in polymerization herein.
More specifically when preparing copolymers
under suspension polymerization conditions, a
free-radical catalyst and an organic liquid can be used
to function as a porogenic agent. By "porogenic agent"
is meant any material used during polymerization which
increases the porosity or permeability of the
copolymer. The preferred organic liquids act as
solvents for the monomers, but are not solvents for the
product copolymer. The porogenic agent is inert in
that it does not react with the monomers, copolymers or
35,181A-F -7-
1 335~72
suspending medium. The desired porogenic agent will be
determined by the character of the monomers in the
monomer mixture and the type of porosity
characteristics desired. If gellular type copolymers
are desired, the copolymerization may be carried out in
the absence of the porogenic agent.
The porogenic agents may be separated into two
groups depending on the type of swelling effect the
liquid has on the copolymer. Non-swelling porogenic
liquids are solvents for the monomer mixture being
polymerized and exert essentially no solvent action on
the copolymer. Any liquids which are solvents for the
monomer mixture and which give negligible swelling of
the copolymer are suitable. Such non-swelling agents
are typically used in the preparation of macroporous
copolymers. Examples of such non-swelling porogenic
agents include alkanols with a carbon atom content of
from 4 to 10, and higher saturated aliphatic liquid
hydrocarbons, such as heptane and isooctane. As a
further guide in the selection of a suitable porogenic
agent, reference may be made to scientific literature
for instance, the discussion of such porogenic agents
in Hildebrand and Scott, Solubility of Non-
Electrolytes, 3d ed., N.Y. 1950.
In general, it may be stated that sufficiently
wide differences in the solubility parameters of
polymer and solvent, respectively, must exist for the
porogenic agent to be effective; and that, once an
effective porogenic agent has been identified, the
behavior of many other liquids may be predicted from
the relative position of the reference polymer and
porogenic agent in published tables, within the
accuracy of such published information. Furthermore,
35,181A-F -8-
1 333672
if the solubility parameter of a given polymer occupies
an intermediate position in these tables, solvents with
both higher or lower parameters may be found to be
effective.
- The macroporous copolymer's structure is
characterized by the presence of regions of densely
packed polymer chains separated by pores, often
referred to as mesopores (S0 to 200 A) and macropores
(>200 ~). The nonuniformity of the internal structure
of a swollen macroporous copolymer causes the copolymer
to appear opaque because of its ability to refract
light. If inert diluents or swelling solvents are
removed from the macroporous co~olymer, for example by
subjecting the copolymer to vacuum or steam
distillation, then in many instances the pores will
collapse from the stress of internal pressures created
by increased attractive forces among the regions of
packed polymer chains, and the copolymer would then
appear transparent or translucent. A type of
macroporous copolymer which retains a porous structure
even upon removal of inert diluents or swelling
solvents is described in U.S. Patent 4,382,124 and is
called "Macroreticular" copolymers. They are
characterized by their opaque appearance, regardless of
whether or not ~he copolymer is examined in the
presence or absence of inert diluents or swelling
solvents.
3o
Members of the other class of porogenic agents
exert a swelling action on the copolymers and are
solvents for the monomer mixture. Such agents are
typically employed in the preparation of isoporous
copolymer beads. Examples of such agents include known
aromatic solvents and chlorinated solvents such as
35,181A-F _9_
-lo- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
ethylene dichloride and methylene chloride.
Preferably, toluene is used as the swelling porogenic
agent. The preferred porogenic agent and the amount of
such agent is dependent on the type of monomer used and
the type of porosity characteristics desired.
The gellular copolymer beads may be prepared by
conventional suspension polymerization techniques such
as those taught in U. S. Patent 4,564,644.
Processes for preparing "macroreticular"
copolymers of a monovinyl aromatic monomer and a
crosslinking monomer, which have been post-crosslinked
with a polyfunctional alkylating or acylating compound
in a swollen state in the presence of a Friedel-Crafts
catalyst, are disclosed in U.S. Patents 4,191,813 and
4,263,407. Any Friedel-Crafts-type catalyst may be
utilized to catalyze the post-crosslinking reaction,
such as the acidic metal halides including aluminum
chloride, stannic chloride, aluminum bromide, boron
fluoride, zinc chloride, ferric chloride and the like.
The catalyst will be effective in amounts ranging from
0.001 to 50 percent by weight based on weight of
polymeric material, preferably ranging from 5 to 30
percent by weight. The optimum amount will depend upon
the reactants and conditions selected for carrying out
the reaction.
In U.S. Patents 4,191,813 and 4,263,407, the
macroreticular copolymers are referred to as "macronet
polymeric adsorbents". A macronet polymeric adsorbent
can be functionalized with hydrophilic groups using
conventional methods for functionalizing copolymers
which are prepared via suspension polymerization with
ion exchange groups. For example, the polymeric
35,181A-F _10_
-"- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
adsorbent can be functionalized by aminating a
chloromethylated polymeric adsorbent with either
dimethylamine, trimethylamine, or dimethylethanolamine,
depending on whether weak base or strong base
functionality is desired. Similarly, the macronet
polymeric adsorbent can be functionalized by
sulfonation. Alternatively, a chloromethylated
polymeric adsorbent can be functionalized by solvolysis
at elevated temperatures.
The most preferred process for preparing
adsorbent resins which have been post-crosslinked in a
swollen state in the presence of a Friedel-Crafts
catalyst is described in East German
Patent DD 249,274 A1. When post-crosslinking a
copolymer, preferably a macroporous copolymer, the
copolymer is contacted with a swelling solvent, as
chlorinated solvents, e.g. ethylene dichloride or
methylene chloride. This patent describes
post-crosslinking a "solvent-free", chloromethylated
macroporous copolymer of styrene and divinylbenzene.
After chloromethylation, the copolymer is first
contacted with a washing agent, such as methanol, and
then the washing agent is removed by either drying the
washed copolymer or extracting the washing agent with
the swelling solvent used for the subsequent
post-crosslinking reaction.
Methods of chloromethylation of the copolymers
are well known in the art as illustrated in Ion
Exchan~e, supra, p. 53 and U.S. Patents 2,642,417;
2,960,480; 2,597,492 and 3,311,602. Generally the
chloromethylation reaction consists of reacting the
copolymer bead with a haloalkylating agent, preferably
bromomethyl methyl ether, chloromethyl methyl ether, or
35,181A-F -11-
-12- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
a mixture of formaldehyde and hydrochloric acid in the
presence of a Friedel-Crafts catalyst.
After post-crosslinking the chloromethylated
copolymer, the copolymer can be functionalized with
- hydrophilic groups in the conventional manner, thereby
producing a useful adsorbent resin. If it is
desirable, functionalization could also be performed
before post-crosslinking the copolymer. Although the
East German patent only describes a process for
preparing adsorbent resins from macroporous copolymers
of styrene and divinylbenzene, the process can be used
to prepare other copolymers of a monovinyl aromatic
monomer and a crosslinking monomer.
More specifically, the post-crosslinked
macroporous resin can be functionalized by using
tertiary amines such as trimethylamine, triethylamine,
tributylamine, dimethylisopropanolamine, ethylmethyl
propylamine, dimethylaminoethanol and the like as
aminating agents, thereby producing strong-base anion
exchange resins. Likewise, weak-base anion exchange
resins may be prepared using primary and secondary
amines such as dimethylamine, diethylamine,
ethylenediamine and diethylenetriamine and the like.
Regardless of the method used for functionalizing the
post-crosslinked macroporous copolymer, after
functionalization, the adsorbent resin's hydrophilic
character increases its efficiency to adsorb bitter
components and acid if so desired. Before contacting
the adsorbent resin with the citrus juice, the resin
can be first treated with either an acidic, basic, or
salt solution.
35,181A-F -12-
,3 1 333672
Preferably, the macroporous copolymer is first
chloromethylated, then post-crosslinked and finally
aminated with either dimethylamine, trimethylamine or
dimethylethanolamine. Most preferably, the
post-crosslinked macroporous copolymer is
functionalized by aminating the chloromethylated
copolymer with dimethylamine. Using conventional ion
exchange terminology, an adsorbent resin functionalized
in this manner and then contacted with an acidic
solution is thus converted to its acid form, which is
the preferred form desired for removing bitter
components from many citrus juices.
Post-crosslinking in a swollen state displaces
and rearranges polymer chains, causing an increase in
the number of micropores (<50~ diameter) and
mesopores. This increases porosity and surface area
and decreases average pore size. Just as signifi-
cantly, post-crosslinking also imparts rigidity to the
polymer, which reduces its tendency to shrink or swell
upon contact with an aqueous solution (often referred
to in the ion exchange art as the "shrink/swell") and
reduces its dry weight capacity when functionalized,
which is an indication of its ion exchange capacity.
These properties as characterized above increase the
capacity of the adsorbent resin to adsorb bitter
components, increase its permeability to citrus juices,
and increase its physical and dimensional stability.
Furthermore, the reduced shrink/swell and dry
weight capacity of the adsorbent resin, which
post-crosslinking induces, is conducive to simple,
inexpensive and efficient regeneration once the bitter
components are loaded onto the resin. The reduced dry
weight capacity allows desorption of the bitter
35,181A-F -13-
_14_ l 3 3 3 6 7 2
components from the loaded resin with a dilute base.
Concentrated bases or acids are unnecessary for
regeneration or cleaning. The reduced shrink/swell
property allows the resin to maintain sufficient
porosity to minimize entrapment of bitter components,
and this property in combination with the reduced dry
weight capacity reduces the tendency of the resin to
retain the bitter components during regeneration.
The post-crosslinking of the resins results in
a ratio of methylene bridges to phenyl groups of 0.1 to
0.9:1, preferably from 0.4 to 0.8:1. The resins after
amination generally exhibit a dry weight capaci y
ranging up to 3.0 meq/g, preferably from 1.0 to 2.0
meq/g. The lower dry weight capacities compared to
conventional resins allow the resins to be regenerated
with lower amounts and concentrations of the basic
regenerants. The lower dry weight capacity of the
resin also reduces the amount of citric acid removed
from the citrus juices.
The adsorbent resin preferably has a surface
area of 150 to 2100 square meters per gram of dry
adsorbent resin (m2/g), more preferably 700 to
1400 m2/g. Surface area is measured by BET nitrogen
adsorption techniques. Porosity ranges from 0.10 to
0.70 cubic centimeters of pore volume per cubic
centimeter of resin (cc/cc), preferably 0.43 to
0.58 cc/cc, as calculated from BET nitrogen adsorption
techniques. The porosity contributed by micropores
ranges from 30 to 100 percent, preferably 30 to 50
percent, depending on the resin characteristics. The
macropores and mesopores which contribute to the
increased porosity, typically have a diameter range
from 30 ~ to 1,000 ~, preferably from 30 ~ to 250 A.
35,181A-F -14-
l 3 J ~ 6 7 2
-15-
The average macropore diameter ranges from 200 A to
300 A. The micropores generally range in diameter from
5 ~ to 30 ~ and more preferably from 5 A to 20 A.
Percent shrink/swell ranges below 15 percent,
more preferably below 7 percent, and most preferably
below 4 percent. Percent shrink/swell is determined by
measuring the volume expansion or contraction of the
adsorbent resin when subjected to hydration or a change
in ionic form. The dry weight capacity, determined
according to conventional methods used for
characterizing ion exchange resins, ranges from greater
than zero to 4.0 milliequivalent per gram (meq/g),
preferably from greater than zero to 2.0 meq/g. If the
macroporous copolymer is functionalized by solvolysis,
for example by contact with water or an alcohol, then
the dry weight capacity is essentially zero.
The adsorbent resin can be used in the form of
beads, pellets, fibers or any other form desirable for
bittering citrus juices. If the adsorbent resin is
used in the form of beads, bead size ranges preferably
from 10 to 1000 microns (~), more preferably from 100
to 800 ~, and most preferably from 300 to 800 ~.
Examples of citrus juices which may be treated
by the practice of the present invention include
grapefruit, Japanese Summer Orange, Navel orange, water
extracted soluble orange solids, early season
tangerines, Valencia, Temple and Murcot oranges, lemon
and other juices which contain limonoids. The term
"citrus juice" is intended to include not only whole
juices extracted from citrus fruit but also juice that
has been further processed by methods such as
concentration, dilution, blending, drying, etc. The
35, 181A-F -15-
- 1 6- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
term also includes juices which may have been treated
by the addition of preservatives, coloring, sweeteners,
flavorings, and the like, it also includes juices which
have been deacidified. Unless otherwise stated the
term citrus juice includes both the serum and the pulp
sediments which may be removed in a centrifuge. By
serum is meant to be a sediment free juice.
Before contacting the adsorbent resin with the
citrus juice, the resin can be first treated with a
basic, salt or acidic solution, e.g. the basic solution
can be sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonium
hydroxide or sodium carbonate; the salt solution can be
sodium citrate, sodium chloride, or sodium citrate; the
acid can be hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, citric
acid, or acetic acid, or such similar solutions can be
used.
The adsorptive resin and the citrus juice to be
debittered may be contacted u-sing any conventional
means which results in the intimate contact of the
resin and the citrus juice. Suitable methods include
fluidized beds, stirred tanks, batch tanks, and
concurrent and countercurrent flow columns. The
contacting may occur batchwise, semi-batchwise, semi-
-continuously or continuously. Preferably, the resin
and citrus juice are contacted continuously in a column
in which the resin is laterally confined. When
contacted in a column or fluidized bed the flow of the
citrus juice may be either in an upflow or downflow
direction.
The amount of residence time during which the
adsorbent resin and the citrus juice are allowed to
remain in contact is largely dependent upon the type of
35,181A-F -16-
_17_ 1 33 3672
resin used, the amount of debittering desired, the
amount of bitter components initially present in the
juice, the amount of resin used, the temperature, and
the pH of the juice. The primary factor in determining
the contact time is the desired level of debittering.
It is preferred that the level of original bitter
components be reduced to a level below 10 ppm, more
preferably below 6 ppm, and most preferably below 2
ppm. Generally, it is desirable to remove at least 50
percent of the bitter components contained in the
juice. This level of debittering is generally observed
when the juice and the resin are allowed to be
contacted for a period ranging from 1 minute to 60
minutes, more preferably from 5 minutes to 40 minutes,
and most preferably from 10 minutes to 30 minutes. In
addition to removing bitter components, another
advantage to employing this method is that while the
bitter components are removed from the juice, the
citric acid is not substantially removed from the
juice. Furthermore when the adsorbent resin is
pretreated with an acid solution, the resin removes
less than 20 percent of the citric acid from the juice.
After the resins become exhausted (i.e. loaded
with bitter components) it is necessary to place the
resins back in a form in which they are capable of
removing additional amounts of the bitter components.
The point at which the resins become exhausted is
3 determined by the maximum amount of bitter components
which are allowed to remain in the treated juice. Once
it is determined that the process is not reducing the
bitter components to the desired level it is necessary
to desorb the bitter component from the resin.
35,181A-F -17-
-18- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
Desorption of the bitter components from the
resin is accomplished by contacting the resin with an
amount of a basic solution which is effective in
removing a substantial amount of the bitter components
which have been adsorbed by the resin. The level of
concentration of the basic solution is not as critical
as the amount of the basic solution which is used. The
amount of basic solution is that amount which is
capable of desorbing at least 60 percent, more
preferably at least 75 percent, and most preferably at
least 85 percent of the bitter components adsorbed by
the resin. Suitable basic solutions include sodium
hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide or
sodium carbonate. A typical basic solution useful for
the desorption of the bitter components comprises 4
percent sodium hydroxide.
The temperature should be maintained at a level
which does not adversely affect the quality of the
citrus juice being debittered. Generally, the tempera-
ture at which the adsorptive resin and the juice are
contacted may range from zero degrees centigrade to
40C, more preferably from 10C to 40C, and most
preferably from 15C to 30C.
The amount of resin used is largely dependent
on the equipment configuration and the level of
debittering desired. Suitable amounts of citrus juice
that can be treated by the resin range from lO to 1000
kg juice/kg resin, more preferably from 100 to 500 kg
juice/kg resin, and most preferably 150 to 450 kg
juice/kg resin.
The pH of the citrus juice which is contacted
with the adsorbent resin is generally determined by the
35,181A-F -18-
-19- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
process steps which have occurred prior to the
debittering step. The pH at which the juice and the
resin are contacted is preferably a value which
normally occurs in the extraction process. In this
method of debittering citrus juices, the pH of the
juice is not significantly altered, even if the resin
is pretreated with a base. Generally the difference
between the pH of the citrus juice before and after
contact with the adsorbent resin is less than 2 pH
units, preferably less than 1 pH unit if a salt or acid
solution is used to pretreat the resin prior to contact
with the juice.
A suitable manner of preparing copolymer beads
which can be appropriately used in the present
invention is illustrated as follows:
Preparation of Macroporous Copolymer Beads
A macroporous copolymer bead is prepared by the
suspension polymerization of a mixture of styrene and
divinylbenzene (DVB). To a 3-liter pressure vessel
fitted with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple and a
recirculating silicone oil heating and cooling system
is charged a pre-mixed aqueous phase consisting of
1,189 g of deionized water and 5.36 g of cellulose
suspending agent. With the agitation turned off, a
pre-mixed organic phase consisting of 450.7 g of
styrene, 49.3 g of 55.5 percent divinylbenzene (DVB),
293.6 g C7-Cg aliphatic hydrocarbon diluent, and 2.5 g
of peroxide initiator is added to the reactor. The
agitator is started at 220 rpm 30 minutes prior to
heating the reactor to 80C. After maintaining this
temperature for 5 hours, the temperature is raised to
and maintained at 110C for another 5 hours. After
35,181A-F -19-
1 333672
--20--
cooling, the copolymer is removed from the reactor and
the mixture subjected to steam distillation to remove
the diluent. The beads which have had the diluent
removed are recovered and air dried for 16 hours. The
5 resulting product is a macroporous copolymer bead of
styrene and divinylbenzene monomers.
Haloalkylation of the Copolymer Beads
To a 2-liter, 3-necked flask equipped with a
stirrer, reflux condenser connected to a caustic
scrubber, thermometer and a recirculating hot water
heating system is charged 150 g of one of the copolymer
beads prepared as described above, 800 ml of
15 chloromethyl methyl ether (CMME) and 50 g of ferric
chloride. The reactor is heated to 52C for 2.5 hours.
After cooling the reactor, the CMME is quenched three
times by washing with methanol. The beads are then
allowed to stand for two hours after the final methanol
20 wash before filtering and air-drying. Each type of
copolymer bead (gellular or macroporous) may be
chloromethylated by the above procedure.
Post-Crosslinkin~ of the Haloalkylated Copolymer
To a 2-liter, 3-necked flask equipped with a
stirrer, reflux condenser connected to a caustic
scrubber, thermometer and a recirculating hot water
heating system is added 200 g of the macroporous
30 chloromethylated copolymer described above and 800 g of
ethylene dichloride (EDC). The reactor is stirred and
heated slowly to 85C to distill off any remaining
moisture prior to post-crosslinking. After cooling the
35 reactor down to 20C, 12 g of aluminum chloride are
added and the reactor is heated to 83C for 6 hours.
35,181A-F -20-
1 333672
After cooling the reactor back down to 25C, the
aluminum chloride is quenched with 100 g of water. The
agitation is continued for an additional hour after
quenching. The post-crosslinked macroporous copolymer
is separated. The beads are washed twice with methanol
followed by two water washes prior to amination.
Functionalization of the Post-crosslinked Macroporous
Copolymer
To a 1-liter Parr reactor is added 400 ml of
the post-crosslinked macroporous copolymer as prepared
above, 100 g of 40 percent dimethylamine, 50 g of
50 percent caustic, and 100 g water. The reactor is
sealed and heated to 90C for 5 hours with agitation.
The reactor is then cooled to 25C and the adsorbent
resin is removed from the reactor and the liquor
decanted. The resin is reslurried in water and
acidified using concentrated hydrochloric acid. After
standing for 1 hour, the liquor is decanted and the
resin is washed with water. The resin is reslurried in
water and enough caustic is added to make the slurry
basic. After standing for another hour, the resin is
backwashed with deionized water until the effluent is
neutral (pH 7). The adsorbent resin is isolated and
air dried.
The following examples are intended to
illustrate the present invention and are not deemed to
limit the scope of the invention.
Example 1
A 50 ml sample of a macroporous adsorbent resin
prepared by the process discussed hereinbefore is
loaded into a glass column of 2.5 cm inner diameter.
35,181A-F -21-
-22- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
The resin exhibits porosity of 1.12 cc/gm when measured
by BET nitrogen porosimetry. The pore sizes range from
70-100 ~ and the surface area is 866 m2/gm. The resin
is treated with an excess of lN hydrochloric acid, and
rinsed with deionized water. The resin is then treated
with an excess of 1N sodium hydroxide and again rinsed
with deionized water. This acid-wash-base-wash cycle
is repeated two more times. The resin is then treated
with a solution containing 4 percent sodium hydroxide.
The resin is then washed with deionized water.
The resin is then transferred to a 500 ml
volumetric flask. The water is decanted off using a
stainless steel mesh over the neck of the flask to
prevent resin loss. One bed volume (50 ml) of single
strength navel orange juice (approx. 11% Brix,; Brix is
the percent solids in a sample) is added, and the
contents of the flask are swirled continuously for ten
minutes. The juice is then decanted off using the
stainless steel mesh and retained. Another two bed
volumes (100 ml) of juice is added to the flask. The
contents are again swirled for 10 minutes, and the
juice decanted. An additional 13, 100 ml aliquots of
juice are added, swirled for ten minutes, decanted, and
collected until a total of 1,450 ml have been treated.
The resin is then transferred back to a small glass
column and rinsed with deionized water. The resin is
then regenerated with an excess of solution containing
3 4 percent sodium hydroxide and 10 percent sodium
citrate, and rinsed with deionized water. The resin is
then transferred back to the 500 ml volumetric flask
and the above procedure for adding lOO ml aliquots of
juice and swirling for ten minutes is repeated until a
total of 23 bed volumes (1,150 ml) have been treated.
35,181A-F -22-
-23- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
The limonin content of the juice collected in
the second batch of juice treated is determined using
BITTERDETEKrW assay. Paplo Jourdan, R. Mancell D.
Oliver, E. L. Weiler, "Competitive Solid Phase Enzyme
5 Linked Immunoassay for the Quantification of Liminon in
Citrus" Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 138, (1984),
PP.19-24.
The results are summarized in Table I.
TABLE I
Bed Volumes Limonin
of Juice (ppm)
0 ( untreated) 40.5
2-3 C l .(
4-5 1.3
10-11 4.9
16-17 - 5.3
22-23 7.9
*The BITTERDETEKrU system has a recommended
lower threshold of 1.0 ppm.
Example 2
The same 50 ml sample of resin as used in
Example 1 is transferred to a glass column with an I.D.
30 of 1 inch. The resin is washed with deionized water.
The resin is then regenerated with a solution
containing 4 percent sodium hydroxide, and then washed
again with deionized water.
The resin is then transferred to a one-inch
I.D. glass tube. The tube has a sintered glass plug at
the base to hold the resin, and is of the type commonly
35, 181A-F -23 -
1 333672
- 24 -
used in the art for experimental continuous flow tests.
A single strength navel orange juice is pumped upflow
through the tube at a rate of six bed volumes per hour
(5 ml per minute). Samples of the treated juice are
5 taken every five bed volumes (250 ml) until 50 bed
volumes ( 2,500 ml) of juice have been treated.
The samples are treated by the same method of
Example 1 and the results are summarized in Table II.
TABLE II
Limonin
Bed Volumes Concentration
of Juice (ppm)
50 ( untreated) 40
6.5
5.4
5.9
20 20 - 8.7
11.4
17.3
15.2
25 40 16.0
17.2
Example 3
3 A 50 ml sample of resin is prepared by the
process referred to in Example 1, except that after
addition of the aluminum chloride catalyst the reactor
is heated to 83C for 2 hours rather than 6 hours.
35,181 A-F -24-
-25- l 3 3 3 6 7 2
The process of Example 1 is repeated on the
resin sample and the results are summarized in
Table III.
TABLE III
Limonin
Bed Volumes Concentration
of Juice (ppm)
0 (untreated) 40.5
2- 3 1.0
4-5 2.4
lO-l l 6.6
16-17 11.2
22-23 13.8
The data summarized in the Tables I-III
illustrates the effectiveness of the present process
20 for removing limonins from navel orange juices.
Example 4
A sample of a macroporous adsorbent resin
25 prepared by the process referred to in Example 1 is
employed herein, except that in preparing the resin, an
iron chloride catalyst is used and the reactor is
heated to 80C for 4 hours. A 50 ml sample of the
adsorbant resin is loaded into a glass column of 1 inch
30 inner diameter. The resin is contacted with a 5
percent hydrochloric acid solution for 45 minutes and
then rinsed with deionized water. The resin is then
contacted with a 4 percent sodium hydroxide solution
for 45 minutes and then washed with deionized water.
35, 181A-F -25-
1 333672
-26-
The acid-water-base-water cycle is repeated twice more
in order to condition the resin.
The resin is then transferred to a one-inch
I. D. glass tube. The tube has a sintered glass plug
at the base to hold the resin, and is of the type
commonly used in the art for experimental continuous
flow tests. A sample of navel orange juice is filtered
to -80 mesh/170~ using an extra coarse grade gas
dispersion tube to simulate commercially centrifuged
juice.
The filtered juice sample is then contacted
with the resin downflow at flow rates of 2, 4, 6, 8,
and 10 bed volumes/hour. The recycle procedure used at
each flow rate was as follows. 40 bed volumes (bv) of
juice were contacted with the bed at the designated
flow rate. Then the bed was washed with 1-1/2 bv of
water and backwashed with water to obtain 100 volume
- 20 percent bed expansion (6 bv water upflow). The bed was
next contacted with 3 bv of lN NaOH at a rate to
provide 45 minutes of contact time to regenerate the
bed. The bed was then rinsed with 10 bv of water and
the cycle repeated. In the case of the experiment done
at 10 bed volumes/hour, the cycle was repeated over
30 times. This demonstrates the excellent ability of
this resin system to be regenerated.
Samples of the treated juice are taken to
determine when less than 6 ppm of limonin is present in
the juice. The limonin content is determined as
discussed more fully hereinbefore in Example 1. The
juice was flowed through the column until a bitterness
component of 6 ppm occurred. The number of bed volumes
of the juice which was treated prior to the bitter
35,181A-F -26-
-27- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
components break through of 6 ppm are summarized in
Table IV.
TABLE IV
Breakthrough of
Flowrate of Juice limonin @ 6 ppm
(Bed volumes/hour) (Bed volumes)
2 ~42
4 25
6 20
8 16
14
The data in Table IV illustrates the
effectiveness of the present invention in removing
limonin from orange juice in a downflow, recycled
application.
Example 5
At room temperature, 22C, 500 ml of freshly
extracted navel orange juice is placed into a 1,000 ml
beaker. 100 Milliliters, tapped volume, of macroporous
absorbent resin as u~ed in example 4 , in the hydrogen
chloride form as described herein, is quantitatively
added to the juice and stirred with a magnetic stirrer.
The stirrer was turned off 3 minutes before sampling in
order to let the resin settle from the juice.
25 Milliliters aliquots were taken at 15 minutes,
30 minutes and 60 minutes elapsed time. The aliquots
were then boiled for 60 minutes to set the limonin
content. By setting the limonin, the limonin
precursors are converted to limonin. The limonin
content of the samples was measured by high performance
35,181A-F -27-
1 333672
-28-
liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results of the
experiment are below:
Time Limonin
Sample (minutes) (ppm)
0 18.2
1 15 4.6
2 30 2.8
3 60 <1.0*
*The BITTERDETEK~ system has a recommended
lower threshold of 1.0 ppm.
Example 6
At room temperature, 22C, 500 ml of freshly
extracted navel orange juice is placed into a 1,000 ml
beaker. 100 Milliliters, tapped volume, of macroporous
absorbent resin as used in example 4, in the freebase
form as described herein, is quantitatively added to
the juice and stirred with a magnetic stirrer. The
stirrer was turned off 3 minutes before sampling in
order to let the resin settle from the juice.
25 Milliliters aliquots were taken at 15 minutes,
30 minutes and 60 minutes elapsed time. The aliquots
were then heated for 60 minutes to set the limonin
content. The limonin content of the samples was
measured by high performance liquid chromatography.
The results of the experiment are below:
35,181A-F -28-
1 333672
-29-
Time Limonin
Sample (minutes) (ppm)
0 0 26.8
1 15 6.2
2 30 2.9
3 60 2.4
Example 7
At room temperature, 22C, 500 ml of freshly
extracted navel orange juice is placed into a 1,000 ml
beaker. 100 Milliliters, tapped volume, of macroporous
absorbent resin as used in example 4, in the freebase
form, is quantitatively added to the juice and stirred
with a magnetic stirrer. The stirrer was turned off
3 minutes before sampling in order to let the resin
settle from the juice. 50 Mi-lliliter aliquots were
taken at 30 minutes, 45 minutes and 60 minutes elapsed
time. The aliquots were then heated for 60 minutes to
set the limonin content. The limonin content of the
samples was measured by high performance liquid
chromatography. The results of the experiment are
below:
Time Limonin
30Sample (minutes) (ppm)
o o 26.8
1 30 3.1
2 45 1.4
3 60 0.9
35,181A-F -29-
-30_ 1 3 3 ~ 6 7 2
Since Examples 5-7 involved treating freshly
extracted juice, these examples demonstrate the claimed
method's ability to remove the limonin precursor,
limonin a-ring lactone.
In Examples 8-10 the following procedures were
used: The citric acid content was determined by
titration with 0.1N sodium hydroxide, to an end-point
of 8.2 pH, and the Brix level was measured using an
Abbe Mark II refractometer.
Example 8
In this example, two samples were prepared as
follows: Sample A was the resin as prepared according
to the procedures described in Example 1, Sample B was
the resin as prepared according to the procedures
described in Example 3. Both samples were treated with
a base, NaOH, before use and the limonin content of the
samples was measured by HPLC. Results are described in
Table V A-B.
Example 9
In this example, two samples were prepared as
follows: Sample A was the resin as prepared according
to the procedures described in Example 1, Sample B was
the resin as prepared according to the procedures
described in Example 3. Both samples were treated with
a salt, sodium citrate, before use and the limonin
content of the samples was measured by HPLC. Results
are described in Table VI A-B.
35,181A-F -30-
1 333672
-31-
Example 10
In this example, two samples were prepared as
follows: Sample A was the resin as prepared according
to the procedures described in Example 1, Sample B was
the resin as prepared according to the procedures
described in Example 3. Both samples were treated with
an acid, H2S04, before use and the limonin content of
the samples was measured by HPLC. Results are
described in Table VII.
3o
35,181A-F -31-
--32--
1 333672
m
~1 . F N ~
~ E -- O O O O O
ta
O G~
O C
~ ~ O N ~) `D r-- a~
C~ E -- O O O O O
Crl
o ~o
* ~ a~ ~ r- ~o co
O O o o o O
n
:o
C a) N o ~ ~ o ~
~_~ G ~a~ 0 O -- N
C~
C
O ~ N ~) NcO 0 0
--' ;X C' ~r) -- N N ~ t~
C _ ~ -- -- -- --
E ~"
r~ 3
m ~ * N
C t~) -- N N _N N
,~ ~ tn r-- t-- ~ _ N
E E N ~ N
X E
s~ =r N ~ O r-
OE N
_~ C.
~O
* ~ a~ ~ N ~1
r-- ~ N
N
O
N CO
~ ~> -- -- N
O
N ~ O ~ N
-- N
3 5, 18lA-F -3 2 -
1 333672
C' ~ s
., .,, . C'
a~ c~
a) ~ -- ~ O oo r-- ~ ¢ C a~
E ~ u~ 5 _ ~ ~ ¢
~ 1~ c a~
c~ c~
a) c c~ c~
~ ~ c a~
C bO ¢ n
a~ O ~ S S
c a ¢J C O
._~ ~ ~ v
c ¢'
a) _ ~ ~ o ~ ~ a~~ ¢~ ¢l
CL CL C~ 5 _ 5 c~ S S
X
v~ - a~
c~
m ~ ~ c~
~ O ~_1
~ -~ n ~ al
:~ ¢~ ~ S 3
E ~
3 ' J- X E a~
m ~ * u~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ¢1 o o s
o x ~ S_ 3
E~ c3 q~ ~ a~
a S_. c~ a~
a~ E O
c 3 E
¢l
CL C. 0 3
E ~ ul a)
¢l a) s a
X a~ u~ ¢1~ C~
a 5 ¢ S b~ 3
O I I I I I ~
O ~ 5 o~o J 1 3 ~ ~
NO S
O a~ ~ E
~ ~ a~ a
m ~ ~ ~
3 ¢1 0
a~
~ S~ O ~
G ~ C_, CL
181A-F -33-
--34--
1 333672
m
o o o o o o
'~ C
c
o
._~ C
E o o o
U~
~D
`D
* _ ~ ~ _
x a` -- ~I 5 u~ ~o
3 o o o o o o
C~
m
J O N ~J O ~ a~
cL _ ~ o -- -- O
o E
o~
C U~
a) ~:
~!~ X a~ o -- o ~ a~ o
~ ~ ~ -- ~ o o o
c _~ m E
C~ U~
cs~ r ~
a~ * O ~D ~ ~ o o
c ~ -- ~ o O
a~ o
a~
m
O -- -- _
E ~ 5 V
U~
C
E -- ~ '
~a -- V
-- U~
~o
*
o ao ~ ~ ~ a~
5 -- ~ ~ N N
~i
a~
E ~ ~ ~ --
~ ~ ,, o
m ~~ 5 o
o ~~ --
o
--34--
3 S , 18 lA-F
1 333672
.,
~o O ~o ~ o a~
n ~ Ln 5 ~ 5 (Y~ C ~L,~
Ul
C
~ ~1
V~ ~-~
a ~ ~
~n ~ ._,
._, ~ ~n
~ 5 ` O ~C V~ a~
V T E~ U~ _ _ 5 _ ^ a~ O
O C ~
E O S
~ O
C
C
* ~ 5 ~ 5 ~ .Ç O n~ ~
~ ~In =~ -- ~ 5 ~
~ 3 E ^ a
_.~ O C ~ C
Q ~ ~
E ~5 C
X C O O
o a~ E
C hO
C~
-- -- ~ 1 3 ~._~
o l l l l l O ~
~J 5 0 ~ 5 E E
o ~ ~
S_ O
35 ,181A-F ~35~
-36- 1 3 3 3 6 7 2
m
C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
E ~D 0.
U~ S S_
a ~ ~ E O
`D O O
x . ~ S J ~ S
3 3 C
O -~ ~
C S
~ 0
TJm
CO-- CO CO ~-~ C
c~a) o ~ ~ o o o c ~ -1
c _ o o-- -- -- ~ 0 3
S
vv~ c ~
_, v~ ~ S
C ~ * r- o u~-- Ln -- ~ C
x ~ ~a~ cr~ o ~ 0._,
TJ 3 O O o ~ C F
O
L O
o s_ c
,__ ~ v o ~r
t~ T
C_, Cl ~ -- N ~ ~ ~1
kl_I E -- -- --_ _ _ ~D ~ aJ
~1C/7 XC,/~ S -~ S
m~O _ ^ CTJ
c c
* t-- -- O ~ U~
~1~ x ~ N ~ .~ S_ ^ /1)
~' 3 ~ T~ S_
0
~ ,S_ O ~
k J~ ~ C
m
T.~ O ~
E Q . . a~ S_ O
~'E ~ ~ ~ ~ r- ~_ S Vl ~ Vl
--1 T.'
C~ S O ~'
C C
CO _ C. C O J~
~O O ~~n ~ ~ Vl vl C~
T.~ a) --I
V~ _i ~ Vl
¢ O 0 3
E
~ I q c
v~ o v~. ~ ~
T~ E ~ o N C ~ ~ s_ ^ 3
3 --~ N ~r o ~o N ~ 3 ~)
o G~ ~ -- N 3 C-~ O O?
O O~ / Vl
a) 3 3 Il)
35 ,181A-F -36--
