Language selection

Search

Patent 1341327 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 1341327
(21) Application Number: 610259
(54) English Title: METHODS FOR DEPOSITING FINISH COATINGS ON SUBSTRATES OF ANODISABLE METALS AND THE PRODUCTS THEREOF
(54) French Title: METHODES DE DEPOSITION DE REVETEMENTS DE FINITION SUR DES ELEMENTS METALLIQUES SE PRETANT A L'ANODISATION, AINSI QUE LES PRODUITS QUI EN DERIVENT
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 204/22.6
  • 204/22.7
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C25D 11/02 (2006.01)
  • C23C 18/18 (2006.01)
  • C25D 5/34 (2006.01)
  • C25D 11/18 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FERN, DAN (Canada)
  • HANTHORN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ALCAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (Canada)
(71) Applicants :
  • FERN, DAN (Canada)
  • HANTHORN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES (Canada)
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2001-12-18
(22) Filed Date: 1989-09-05
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract



New processes are disclosed for depositing metal coatings
on substrates of anodisable metals, such as aluminum and its
alloys, the coatings being applied directly on to a porous
anodised layer of relatively wide pores that has been produced
on the surface of the substrate by phosphoric acid
anodisation. Pore-filling metal is first electrolytically
deposited in the pores, the metal depositing initially on the
bottom walls and the lower parts of the side walls; usually
until the pores are from about 3% to about 30% filled. Metal
deposition is then continued using an electroless process until
the pores are filled to the desired extent, usually until a
support coating has been applied over the entire anodised
layer. Other metal coatings can then be applied over the
support layer, either by electrolytic or electroless methods.
Electroless coatings of considerable thickness (as much as 75
micrometres) can successfully be applied. The new products of
such processes comprise a substrate of anodisable metal having
on a surface an anodised layer of thickness of about 0.5 to
about 50 micrometres; the pores of the anodised layer have
pore-filling metal electrolytically deposited therein, and
pore-filling metal electroless deposited on the
electrolytically deposited metal. The electroless metal may
constitute the final layer or other layers may be deposited
over it to give the final product. The interposed
electrolytically deposited metal provides improved adhesion to
the anodised material as compared to direct electroless
deposited metal.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



-15-
CLAIMS:
1. A method of depositing metal on a surface of a
substrate of an anodisable metal, said method comprising:
a) anodising the substrate using phosphoric acid to
produce a porous anodised layer of which is of pore size of
transverse dimension greater than about 0.03 micrometre and of
thickness from about 0.5 to about 50 micrometres;
b) electrolytically depositing pore-filling metal
into the pores to adhere to the walls thereof and so as to
fill each pore from about 3% to about 30% of its volume; and
c) continuing the deposition of pore-filling metal
by electroless deposition on the electrolytically deposited
metal to fill at least 3% of the volume of each pore.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
anodisation produces pores of transverse dimension from about
0.03 to 0.10 micrometre.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the
electrolytic deposition is continued to a cut-off value at
which adhesion of the metal begins to decrease.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the
electrolytically deposited pore-filling metal is deposited to
a thickness of up to 550 milligrams per square metre.
5. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the electroless deposition is continued until a
coating of the metal of thickness in the range of about 0.5 to
3 micrometres is deposited on the surface of the anodised
layer.


-16-
6. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the
electroless deposited metal is deposited to form a support
layer on the surface of the substrate of a thickness in the
range of about 0.5 to 3 micrometres, and in that one or more
subsequent layers are deposited on the support layer.
7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the electroless deposited metal is deposited to a
thickness of about 10 to 25 micrometres on the surface of the
substrate.
8. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the anodisable substrate metal is selected from
aluminum and magnesium and an anodisable alloy thereof.
9. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the anodisable metal is selected from cast aluminum
and an alloy thereof.
10. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the electrolytically deposited pore-filling metal is
selected from nickel, cobalt, zinc, copper, tin, palladium and
an alloy thereof.
11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4,
wherein the electroless pore-filling metal is selected from
nickel, cobalt, copper, tin and an alloy thereof.
12. A method of depositing metal on a surface of a cast
aluminum substrate, said method comprising:
a) anodising the cast aluminum substrate using
phosphoric acid to produce a porous anodised layer which is of
pore size of transverse dimension greater than about 0.03
micrometre and a thickness from about 0.5 to about 50
micrometres;


-17-
b) electrolytically depositing pore-filling metal
into the pores to adhere to the walls thereof and so as to
fill each pore from about 3% to about 30% of its volume; and
c) continuing the deposition of pore-filling metal
by electroless deposition on the electrolytically deposited
metal to fill at least 3% of the volume of each pore.
13. A metal plated product consisting of an anodisable
metal substrate anodised by acid so as to have a porous
anodised layer and having metal deposited in the pores
thereof, wherein:
a) the anodised layer is phosphoric acid anodised to
have pores of transverse dimension greater than about 0.03
micrometre and to have a thickness of about 0.5 to about 50
micrometres;
b) the porous layer has a pore-filling metal
electrolytically deposited in the pores thereof so as to
adhere to the walls thereof and fill each pore from about 3%
to about 30% of its volume; and
c) the porous layer has pore-filling metal
electrolessly deposited in the pores on the electrolytically
deposited metal so as to fill at least 3% of the volume of
each pore.
14. A product as claimed in claim 13, wherein the
substrate has been anodised to produce pores of transverse
dimensions from about 0.03 to 0.10 micrometre.
15. A product as claimed in claim 13, wherein the
electrolytically deposited pore-filling metal is deposited to
a thickness of up to 550 milligrams per square metre.


-18-
16. A product as claimed in claim 13, wherein the
electroless metal is sufficiently thick to form a coating
deposited on the surface of the anodised layer.
17. A product as claimed in claim 16, wherein the
electroless deposited metal is deposited to a thickness of
about 10 to 25 micrometres on the surface of the substrate.
18. A product as claimed in any one of claims 13 to 16,
wherein the electroless deposited metal is deposited to form a
support layer on the surface of the substrate of a thickness
in the range of about 0.5 to 3 micrometres, and in that one or
more subsequent layers are deposited on the support layer.
19. A product as claimed in any one of claims 13 to 16,
wherein the anodisable substrate metal is selected from
aluminum and magnesium and an anodisable alloy thereof.
20. A product as claimed in any one of claims 13 to 16,
wherein the anodisable metal is selected from cast aluminum
and an alloy thereof.
21. A product as claimed in any one of claims 13 to 16,
wherein the electrolytically deposited pore-filling metal is
selected from nickel, cobalt, zinc, copper, tin, palladium and
an alloy thereof.
22. A product as claimed in any one of claims 13 to 16,
wherein the electroless pore-filling metal is selected from
nickel, cobalt, copper, tin and an alloy thereof.
23. A metal plated product consisting of a cast aluminum
substrate acid anodised to have a porous anodised layer and
having metal deposited in the pores thereof wherein:


-19-
a) the anodised layer is phosphoric acid anodised to
have pores of pore size in transverse dimension greater than
about 0.03 micrometre and of thickness of about 0.5 to about
50 micrometres;
b) the porous layer has pore-filling metal
electrolytically deposited in the pores thereof so as to
adhere to the walls thereof and so as to fill each pore from
about 3% to about 30% of its volume; and
c) the porous layer has pore-filling metal
electrolessly deposited in the pores on the electrolytically
deposited metal so as to fill at least 3% of the volume of
each pore.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




13~13~27
r~..~~ - ~ .
METHODS FOR DEPOSITING FINISH COATINGS ON SUBSTRATES OF
ANODISABLE METALS AND THE P1~DUCTS THEREOF
Field of the Invention
This invention is concerned with improvements in or
relating to methods for depositing metal coatings on substrates
of anodisable metals, such as aluminum and its anodisable
alloys, and to the products of such methods.
Review of the Prior Art
The deposition of metals on a substrate, usually steel
or aluminum, is a well-developed art. Plating on less easily
oxidized metals such as steel is relatively routine, involving
for example the deposition of a layer of copper directly on the
steel substrate, followed in succession by a thick "semi-bright"
nickel layer, a thinner °bright° nickel layer, and an even
thinner finish layer of chromium; the chromium is
semi-transparent and the bright appearance is actually provided
by the bright nickel layer seen through the finish chromium
layer.
Plating on anodisable metals, such as aluminum and its
anodisable alloys, is considerably more difficult owing to their
relative ease of oxidation, and the consequent inevitable
presence of an oxide coating which must be removed if adequate
adhesion of the deposited layers to the underlying metal
substrate is to be obtained. The art currently is dominated by
two methods of preparing the substrate surface, namely zincate
and stannate immersion. In these processes the substrate
surface is immersed in a suitable zincate or stannate solution,
usually of the sodium salt, together with other additions that
have been found in practice to increase the appearance and
adhesion of the coatings. The zinc or tin atoms respectively
displace aluminum atoms at the surface, in the process removing
the oxide layer, to result in an adherent zinc or tin layer on
which other layers, for example copper followed by nickel and
chromium can be deposited. Both of these processes are
relatively expensive and are therefore mainly used on expensive
commodities. The stannate immersion processes are reported to
provide better anti-corrosion performance and adhesion of the




.1341327
- 2 -
resultant coatings, but are the more expensive of the two
because of the more expensive components and longer processing
times.
It has also been proposed to deposit adherent metal
coatings directly on aluminum or aluminium alloy substrates by
producing a porous anodized layer at the surface of the -
substrate onto which the subsequent metal layers are deposited;
this anodized layer incorporating the oxide layer that was
present on the substrate surface. In an article entitled
"Plating on Aluminum, a Review" by D.S. Lashmore, published in
the ,Tune 1985 issue of "Plating & Surface Finishing" (pp 36-39),
summarizing previous publications, it was reported that studies
have shown that there must be a minimum pore size in the
anodized coating, into which the subsequent metal coatings can
mechanically "lock" or "key", and that this limits the process
to the use of electrolytes that will produce fairly large pores
of the order of 0.07 micrometres (700 Angstroms). The report
goes on to state it has been found empirically that only
anodising solutions comprising phosphoric acid are sucessful, i
sulfuric or oxalic acid sometimes being mixed with the
phosphoric acid. The report further states that the adhesion of
the subsequent coatings is primarily mechanical, with the
cohesive strength of the porous oxide coatings to the metal
substrate being the limiting factor, so that improvements in the
anodic process should be directed towards increasing this
cohesive strength and the strength of the oxide layer itself.
Despite developments of these phosphoric acid anodizing/coating
processes for over 50 years they have not yet been widely
adopted commercially, apparently because of relatively poor
adhesion and brightness.
Definition of the Invention
It is therefore the principal object of the present
invention to provide new methods for plating metal layers on
substrates of aluminum and its alloys, and to provide substrates
of aluminum and its alloys having metal layers plated thereon by
the new methods.
In accordance with the present invention there is




~ 341 32 7
-3-
provided a new method of depositing metal on a surface of a
substrate of an anodisable metal, said method comprising:
a) anodising the substrate using phosphoric acid to
produce a porous anodised layer which is of pore size greater
than about 0.03 micrometre and of thickness from about 0.5 to
about 50 micrometres;
b) electrolytically depositing pore-filling metal into
the pores to adhere to the walls thereof and so as to fill each
pore from about 3$ to about 30~ of its volume; and
c) continuing the deposition of pore-filling metal by
electroless deposition on the electrolytically deposited metal
to fill each pore to the required extent.
Also in accordance with the invention there is provided
a metal plated product consisting of an anodisable metal
substrate acid anodised to have a porous anodised layer and
having metal deposited in the pores thereof wherein:
a) the anodised layer is phosphoric acid anodised to
have pores of pore size greater than about 0.03 micrometre and
to have a thickness of about 0.5 to about 50 micrometres;
b) the porous layer has pore-filling metal
electrolytically deposited in the pores thereof so as to adhere
to the walls thereof and fill each pore from about 3$ to about
30$ of its volume; and
c) the porous layer has pore-filling metal
electrolessly deposited in the pores on the electrolytically
deposited metal so as to fill each pore to the required extent.
Description of the Drawings
Methods of depositing various layers of metals on a
surface of an anodisable substrate, and the products of such
methods, constituting particular preferred embodiments of the
invention, will now be described by way of example with
reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:-




".-M,
1341327
- 4 -
Figure 1 is a plane cross-se~ion through the surface
and adjacent portion of an aluminum substrate, through the
porous anodised layer formed thereon by phosphoric acid
anodising, and through the various layers of metal that have
been deposited on the anodised layer; and
Figure 2 is a plane cross-section to a much enlarged
scale of the small portion 2 in Figure 1, showing the anodised
Iayer and the immediately adjacent metal layers.
Description of the Preferred embodiments
As indicated above, Figure 1 is a cross-section through
an aluminum substrate 10 at the upper surface of which there has
been formed by acid anodising a layer 12 of aluminum oxide, a
portion of which, together with the immedia~ely adjacent
portions of the substrate and deposited metal layers, are shown
to a larger scale in Figure 2. The anodising employs phosphoric
acid which produces elongated wide pores 14 (not seen in Figure
1), and in accordance with this invention at least the bottom
portions of the pore walls have had applied thereto by
electrolytic deposition a layer~of adherent pore-filling metal
16 (also not seen in Figure 1). The electrolytically deposited
metal is found initially to deposit principally at the bottoms
of the pores and the immediately adjacent parts of the side
walls, and the resultant coatings or layers then grow
progressively in thickness upwards in the pores as more metal is
deposited. It is also found initially that discontinuous
patches 17 of the metal are deposited on the side walls in what
appears at present to be a random manner. After sufficient
metal has been electrolytically deposited the filling of the
pores is continued using eleetroless deposited metal 18 until,
in this embodiment, they are completely filled and a continuous
support layer has been formed over the entire surface of the
anodised layer 12. In this embodiment cobalt is used as the
initial electrolytically deposited metal 16 and 17, while
electroless nickel is employed for the metal 18. The deposition
of metal layers is continued to provide a semi-bright nickel
layer 20, a bright nickel layer 22 and a tri-chrome finish layer
24.




1341327
- 5 -
The invention thus employs the electrolytic deposition
of pore filling metal to apply an inital "seed" coating to the
bottom wall portion of each pore and to at least the lower
portion of the side wall of each pore. It is found that such an
electrolytically deposited metal coating adheres very well to
the anodised material, and the subsequently electroless
deposited metal adheres very well to the electrolytically
deposited meal, whereas metals deposited by electroless
processes directly on aluminum oxide do not adhere well and
result in lower strength metal coatings. Electroless coating
processes have the advantage that they are more efficient than
ele~rolytic processes in filling the pores and result in more
dense or compact coatings, and the processes of the invention
enable advantage to be taken of this property while overcoming
the potential problem of insufficient adherence of the
electroless deposited metal to the anodised layer.
The anodised layer is inherently porous in structure
because of the manner of its formation, and a typical structure
of a layer 12 obtained by phosphoric acid anodising of the
aluminum substrate 10 is illustrated by Figure 2. For
convenience in drawing the horizontal surfaces of the layers are
shown as flat, but in practice they will be seen to be highly
irregular even at quite low magnification.
Figure 1 illustrates an embodiment in which an anodised
layer 12 of aluminum oxide (A1203) has been produced of
about 2 micrometres (20,000 Angstroms) thickness, typically by
use of phosphoric acid at about 20°C and of about 109g/litre or
10% by weight concentration, employing an anodising voltage of
about 50-60 volts for 10 minutes. The porous structure obtained
is relatively uniform, although highly idealised as shown in
Figure 1 for convenience in drawing, and typically the pores 14
will be found to average 0.09 micrometze (900 Angstzoms) in
transverse dimension, spaced on average about 0.07 micrometre
(700 Angstroms) from one another. The pores have an average
length/width ratio of 20:1. The bottoms of the pores do not end
at the surface of the aluminum substrate, but instead they are
on average spaced about 0.07 micrometre (700 Angstroms) from
that surface to form a continuous non-porous barrier layer 26 of




4~
_6_ 1341327
the relatively non-conductive aluminum oxide, the thickness of
this layer depending principally directly on the value of the
anodising voltage. It may be noted that references herein and
in the literature to pore sizes, etc. are usually made in
Angstroms, while references to tt~.icknesses are made in
micrometres, merely to avoid the need to refer to large numbers
or small fractions, 1 micrometre being equal to 10,000 Angstroms.
It has been found possible in previous commercial
practice wit. sulf uric acid anodising that produces long narrow
pores of average transverse dimension 0.015 micrometre (150
Angstroms) to deposit pore filling metal layers that are
sufficiently strong and stable of up to about 5 micrflmetres
thickness, but beyond this value.the hydrogen that is generated
in the long, narrow pores (i.e, length to width ratio of about
330:1) by the electrolytic deposition process tends to cause
spalling of the anodised coating, destroying its strength to the
extent that it is unsuitable to receive and retain the pore
filling metal. Another problem is that it is difficult to
deposit a sufficiently adherent coating of a pore-filling metal
into the long narrow pores employing conventional D.C. plating
methods. Thus, there is too great a tendency for the plating
step to cause physical disruption of the anodised layer, so that
the plated metal layer is poorly adherent.
Metal deposition processes may use either alternating
current or direct current, or a combination thereof. A.C.
deposition is usually much slower that the equivalent D.C.
'a~ current and D.C, is therefore preferred if speed is important.
However, D.C. has a greater tendency to cause disruption of the
coating especially with the narrow pores characteristic of
sulfuric acid anodising. It is therefore also know to use
modified A.C., preferably one in which a predetermind
negative-going D.C. has been superi~osed on the A.C. Such a
system avoids the disrcption that would be produced by a pure
D.C. current. A.C. produces metal deposition owing to the
rectification characteristic of the aluminum oxide, but as the
thicknesses of the coatings increase such unmodified A.C.
deposition gives poorer pore penetration and slower deposition
rates. The D.C. component is therefore increased to the maximum
lzvel that does not cause aisruption. This method of deposition




1 341 32 7
is disclosed for example in U,S. Patent No. 4,226,680, assigned
to Alcan Research and Development Limited; these processes have
now become known as the Alcan 'ANOLOK' (Trade Mark) processes.
Other modified A.C. systems are also possible; for example,
another system offsets the A.C. waveform in a manner that will
produce an effective negative bias, while a further way is to
increase the amplitude of the negative portion of the waveform
relative to that of the positive portion, which again has the
same ef f ect .
The processes of the invention are applicable generally
to anodisable metals, their alloys and composites; whether
rolled, pressed, cast or wrought. Cast metals are generally
less dense and more porous in stru~ure than the corresponding
rolled, pressed or wrought product. Attempts to use only
electroless deposition, or only ele~rolytic deposition,
directly on the anodised surface of a cast material have not
been as successful as the processes of the invention because of
this higher porosity and because of the usual higher silicon
content (e. g. 7-12%) of such metals. Thus, the more porous
metal structure results in anodised layers of lower strength and
quality, and electrolytic deposits are more adversely affected
by the anodic layer quality than are electroless layers, it is
believed because of entrapment of some of the silicon in the
barrier layer which interferes with the normal flow of electrons
in the deposition current. On the other hand, as explained
above, layers applied by direct electroless deposition are
generally poorly adherent to the already lower strength anodised
layer.
Suitable substrate metals, in addition to aluminum and
its anodisable alloys, are magnesium~and its anodisable alloys.
Metals suitable for the ele~rolytic deposition of the initial
'seed' layer are cobalt, nickel, zinc, copper, tin and
palladium. When the substrate is aluminum or an alloy thereof
cobalt has been found to be particularly suitable for
electrolytic deposition and nickel for electroless deposi~ion.
It is found that as the thickness of the electrolytic
layers within ~he pores increases a point may be reached a~




1341327
_$_
which the adhesion to the aluminum begins to decrease, and this
then sets an upper limit at which the electrolytic deposition
should be stopped and replaced by the electroless deposition.
Of course the electrolytic deposition can be discontinued
earlier depending upon the other parameters of the particular
process. It is found that the thickness of the initial seed
coatings, as measured from the bottom of the pores, correlates
well with the apparent colour of the substrate surface as seen
by an observer, and the table below shows a specific correlation
that is obtained when the anodised layer that has been produced
by sulfuric acid anodising is 5 micrometres thick; the
electrodeposited metal is cobalt. The same principle applies
with phosphoric acid anodising but the colours obtained are
slightly different. The thickness of the electroiytically
deposited metal is most expeditiously expressed in the units
milligrams (mg) of metal per square metre (m2) of anodic
surface. It is found with this combination that the cut-off for
good adhesion is between about 550 and about 850 mg/m2.



Colour mg Co/ %Fill Adhesion
_m2


Champagne 70 3.5 good


Very Light Bronze 180 9.0 good


Light Bronze 340 17.0 good


Medium Bronze 550 27.5 good


Dark Bronze 850 42.5 . poor


Black 2000 100.0 poor
It will be seen that as little as about 3% will give-
3U good adhesion and this is the minimum value for satisfactory
results, while at the upper thickness limit of medium bronze for
pores of 5 micrometres depth it is estimated that each pore is
about 30% filled in volume with the electrolytically deposited
metal, leaving the remaining 70% to be ffilled with the
electroless deposited metal. Nickel is found to produce




1341327
- 9 -
approximately the same colour correlation as cobalt. Copper
produces a range of different colours extending from pink
through light maroon and dark maroon to black. Tin requires a
thicker anodised coating of about 10 micrometres before black is
obtained.
The amount of electroless applied metal that is
deposited in the pores will of course depend upon the required
properties and intended use of the resultant product, and for
some applications the pores may not need to be completely
filled; from about 6% to about 60% of complete filling may be
all that is required. Thus, while a useful range for the
electrolytic deposition is about 3% to about 30%, a useful range
for the electroless deposition is also from about 3% to the
remainder rec3uired to f ill the pores to the required extent.
Once the initial electrolytic seed deposit and the
subsequent electroless deposit have been applied the subsequent
processing steps will also depend upon the commercial
application of the resultant product and the characteristics and
appearance that are required. For example, the electroless
deposition can simply be continued until a final layer (over the
anodised layer) of adequate thickness is obtained, the usual
range for such an application being from about 50 micrometres to
about 75 micrometres. More usually the electroless deposition
is continued until it forms a support layer of adequate
thickness over the entire surface of the anodised layer, as
illutrated by Figures 1 and 2, the usual values being from about
U.5 micrometre to about 3 micrometres, more preferably in the
. range 1-2 micrometres. Thereafter, a finish layer (for example
chromium) may be applied over the support layer, with or without
the provision of one or more intermediate layers between the
support and finish layers.
The use of phosphoric acid ~is found to be particularly
advantageous with cast materials, and it has been found for
example that the cast aluminum such as is used for automotive
wheels the adhesion of tze final coatings was inc:eased by at
least 50% upon use of phosphoric acid in place of sulfuric acid




1341327
-lo-
. for the anodising. A suitable test for adhesion is to cut the
finished part through the substrate and coatings and then to
attempt to lift or peel the coating away from the substrate by
use of a sharp knife edge; it was found possible with this test
to peel the coatings from sulfuric acid anodised substrates with
various degrees of difficulty depending on the processing
conditions, but not possible to peel it from phosphoric acid
anodised substrates.
The use of an anodised layer before plating introduces
the possibility, if desired, of a reduction in the thickness of
the subsequent plated layers with consequent cost savings. The
anodising processes described employing acid baths in the
temperature range of 20-35°C are usually characterised as
"conventional" anodising, but "hard anodising" processes can
also be employed for the invention, the usual bath temperature
being in the range 3-7°C; such hard anodised layers are usually
thicker than the conventional anodised layers. Further
reductions in the subsequent layers therefore are possible by
using a thicker and/or stronger anodic film such as that
produced using these lower temperature anodising processes.
Such hard layers also constitute an excellent basis for the
pore-filling metal deposition characteristic of the invention,
the electroless layer being the support layer for further
deposits, which can be thinner than those normally previously
used. It will be understood that this industry is particularly
cost conscious, especially with regard to the relatively
expensive corrosion-resistant metals that are employed in the.
intermediate and finish coatings, so that any saving that can be
achieved in their thickness for ah equivalent performance in
protection and/or appearance is commercially important.
In the processes of the invention the anodised layer 10
can be of a thickness in the range 0.5 - 50 micrometres, usually
in the range 1-10 micrometres, preferably in the range 2-6
micrometres, and more preferably 3-5 micrometres, with a
G:ic:cness of 5 micrometres being usually commercially suitable.
The electroless-deposited pore-filling material need not form a




1 34 ~ 32 7
- 11 -
support coating of more than about 2 micrometres thickness and
excellent results can be obtained with the application of a
single thin finish coating of chromium over the support layer.
The preferred electroless deposited metal is nickel. Metals
other than nickel, such as cobalt, tin or copper, can also be
used. Because of the thin coatings that are employed it is
preferred in some processes to pre-treat the surface of the
anodisable metal to obtain a very smooth surface; this can be a
'macro" treatment by buffing and/or a "micro" trea'-,.ment of
chemical or electro-brightening. The finished chromium layer if
provided preferably is of thickness in the range of 0.2-0.3
micrometres.
The invention is further illustrated by the following
specific example:
Example 1
The process is employed to provide a bright finishing
procedure for articles such as cast aluminum automotive wheels,
giving a simulation of the appearance of bright chrome or
stainless steel, and includes the following steps.
1. An aluminum substrate consisting of cast alloy
A413, or forge grade material, is pre-treated by cleaning with
appropriate alkaline and/or acid solutions, or is pretreated by
mechanical buffing.
2. The pretreated substrate is then subjected to a
phosphoric acid anodising treatment using acid of 109g/L (10%)
concentration by weight at 21°C; the anodising is begun at 60VDC
for 30 minutes and is then tamped down to approximately 18 VDC
for about 0.5 minute.
3. The anodised substrate has the initial 'seed"
ele~rolytic coating of cobalt applied using a cobalt-based
'ANOLOR" (trade mark) electrolyte as disclosed in U.S. Patent
No. 3,616,309 at 21°C and 12.5 V.A.C., with or without up to 4
V.D.C. bias. The electolytic deposition proceeds for a period
of about one minute.
4. A pore-filling coating of nickel is then applied by
immersion in an electroless nickel solution (Harshaw "Alpha




'341327
- 12 -
1038" - trade mark) for 20 minutes at pH4.7 and temperature
93°C, thus completely filling the pores and forming a support
coating of about 0.5 to about 3.0 micrometres thickness
5. The support layer is coated with an
electrolytically-deposited semi-bright layer of nickel of about
micrometres thickness using Harshaw "PERFLOw" (trade mark)
semi-bright solution at pH4.3; temperature 57°C; current
density 5 amps per square decimetre (A/dm2); and for a period
of thirty minutes.
10 6. The semi-bright layer is coated with a bright layer
of nickel of about 10 micrometres thickness using Harshaw
"SUPREME" (trade mark) bright solution at pH4.0; temperature
66°C; current density 4A/dm2 and period 10 minutes.
7. The example is completed by electrolytically
depositing a trichrome finish layer using Harshaw "TRI-C~ROh~
PLUS" (trade mark) solution at pH2.7; temperature 30°C; current
density 10 A/dm2 for 5 minutes.
During the process the substrate will be rinsed in
known manner which need not be detailed here. It may be noted
that in this and the other examples described a cyanide or
hexavalent chromium bath is not used, which is environmentally
desirable.
Example 2
In the process of Example 1 the cobalt-based
electrolyte employed to deposit the initial layer is replaced
with a copper-based electrolyte comprising for example 35g/1 of
CuS04.5H20; 20g/1 MgS04.7H20 and 5g/1 H2S04 at pH
1.3 and 21°C.
Example 3
In the process of Example 1 the cobalt-based
electrolyte employed to deposit the initial layer is replaced
with a tin-based electrolyte comprising for example lOg/1 of
SnS04 and 20g/1 of H2S04 at pH 1.3 and 21°C.
Example 4
In the process of Example 1 the cobalt-based
electrolyte employed to deposit the initial layer is replaced




1341327
- 13 -
with a conventional Watt's nickel-based electrolyte comprising
for example 240g/1 of NiS04.6H20; 60g/1 of NiC12.6H20
and 45g/1 of H3803 at pH 4.5 and 21°C.
Example 5
In the process of Example 1 the cobalt-based
electrolyte employed to deposit the initial layer is replaced
with a palladium-based electrolyte comprising for examaple a 10
ml/litre 'PAr.~R~E' (trade mark) aqueous solution of Technic
Inc. This process is particularly suited for articles with a
simulated stainless look for exterior application.
Example 6
To obtain a bright black finish, especially for cast
aluminum automobile wheels, the process of any of of examples 1
through 5 is followed by the deposition of a black-chrome finish
layer using Harshaw 'Ci~tOMONYX" (trade mark) solution at
temperatures 21°C; current density 10-40 A/dm2 and period of 5
minutes.
Example 7
To obtain articles with a simulated appearance of
stainless steel and for interior applications a substrate cast
alloy is subjected to the processes of any one of examples 1
through 5 with the omission of the deposition of the semi-bright
nickel layer.
Example 8
,25 To obtain machine parts and articles suitable for other
engineering applications the anodising and electrolytic
deposition steps of any one of examples 1 through 5 are followed
by a nickel electroless deposition step in which the deposition
period is about 30 minutes to about 120 minutes, as required, to
give layers of about 10.0 micrometres to about 40.0 micrometres
thickness.
Example 9
To obtain black material particularly suitable for the
fabrication of solar panels a substrate is subjected to the
anodisi:.g, initial electrolytic plating and electroless plating
steps of any one of examples 1 through 5, followed by the




1341327
- 14 -
deposition of semi-bright nickel for a reduced period of about
lU to about 20 minutes, and the deposition of black chrome by
the step in example 6.
Example 10
Bright aluminum plated composite articles are prepared
fran a substrate of composite material AA-6061 (incorporating
10$ by weight of aluminum oxide) using the plating procedure of
any one of examples 1 through 5.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 1341327 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2001-12-18
(22) Filed 1989-09-05
(45) Issued 2001-12-18
Deemed Expired 2005-12-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1989-09-05
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 2001-12-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - Old Act 2 2003-12-18 $100.00 2003-12-03
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALCAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
FERN, DAN
HANTHORN, CHRISTOPHER JAMES
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2001-12-18 1 18
Abstract 2001-12-18 1 44
Description 2001-12-18 14 760
Claims 2001-12-18 5 170
Drawings 2001-12-18 1 41
Prosecution Correspondence 1998-06-15 14 415
PCT Correspondence 2000-03-13 2 72
PCT Correspondence 2001-05-29 1 35
Prosecution Correspondence 2000-10-05 6 225
Prosecution Correspondence 1997-04-18 4 120
Prosecution Correspondence 1996-01-18 3 115
Prosecution Correspondence 1995-03-21 2 71
Prosecution Correspondence 1994-09-14 2 53
Prosecution Correspondence 1993-08-30 3 92
Prosecution Correspondence 1992-08-10 25 1,067
Office Letter 2000-03-27 1 20
Office Letter 2000-03-27 1 18
Office Letter 2000-03-30 1 17
Examiner Requisition 2000-04-05 3 151
Examiner Requisition 1997-12-30 4 207
Examiner Requisition 1996-11-15 3 161
Examiner Requisition 1995-11-17 2 118
Examiner Requisition 1995-03-03 2 99
Examiner Requisition 1994-08-03 2 75
Examiner Requisition 1992-05-27 1 78