Language selection

Search

Patent 2003356 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2003356
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR PRODUCING A DRY GRANULAR PRODUCT
(54) French Title: METHODE DE PRODUCTION D'UN GRANULE SEC
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract



Dry sodium carbonate is reacted with acetic acid and a polymer emulsion
according to the following equation:
Na2CO3 + 2HAc * [5H2O ~ Polymer Emulsion]
2[NaAc ~ 3H2O ~ Polymer Emulsion Complex] + CO2
wherein the polymer is inert with respect to sodium carbonate and acetic acid
so as
to maintain the integrity of the polymer during the reaction, which results in
a dry
granular product in the form of an aqueous polymer complex of sodium acetate
trihydrate.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A process for producing a dry granular product in the
foam of an aqueous polymeric complex of sodium acetate, trihydrate,
comprising reacting dry sodium carbonate, acetic acid and a polymer
emulsion selected from the group of silicone emulsions, acrylic
emulsions, surfactant solutions, and polyvinylpyrrozidone solutions
wherein the polymer is inert with respect to sodium carbonate and
acetic acid so as to maintain the integrity of said polymer during
said reaction.

2. A process according to claim 1 and characterized
further in that the mole ratio of acetic acid to the water content
of the polymer emulsion is two moles of acetic acid to five moles
of water.

3. A process according to claim 1 and characterized
further in that the reaction is in accordance with the following
equations:
Na2CO3 + 2HAc + [5H2O ~ Polymer emulsion]~
2[NaAc ~ 3H2O ~ Polymer Emulsion Complex] + CO2

4. A process according to claim 1 and characterized
further in that said polymer emulsion is a high solids,
non-crosslinking, polymer emulsion.


-4-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




~~~J:~ ~~~b
hFtOCBS.S FOIEt lPR~IDI1CING A i3R'~" CILANtyI~AR ~R.UI~tlCT
Baeka7eound of the Invention
The present invention relates to praduc°.in~ sodium acetate polymer
emulsion
complexes and more particularly to producing such complexes in which the
integx°ity
of the polymer emulsion is maintained during the process so that a dry
granular
product is obtained, yet the emulsion has retained its original waErr
relationship.
As is well known, polymer emul$ions have many useful farms.
Ganventionally, they are produced in liquid form and are applied to a
particular use
in liquid form that are diluted to provide the desired concentcatlon far the
particular
. , applioatian. The storing, transporting and handling of Iiduid emulsions is
obviously
more complicated and difficult than were the emulsion in a solid form. Also,
liquid
emulsions are susceptible to freeze/thaw instability.
Sodium acetate is known for use in controlling acidity and as a dilutant,
i.e. in dyestuff blends. Sodium acetate has also been used by the present
inventor in
a prior art process with dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid to produoe sodium
lodecyl
benzene sulforsate as' a dry detergent in granular form, but such prior art
praCess
involved a reaction of the sodium acetate and the dddecyl benzene sulfonic
said
such that the dodeayl benzene sulfonie acid ryas changed chemically to sodium
dodecyl
benzene sulfonate and the process also involved a highly effervescent
re~etiori that
was difficult to control,
Sumaaar,~ of the Invention
In contrast to the above~dESCribed prior act, it has been discovered by
the present invention that a dry granular complex of sodium acetate trihydrate
can
be produced by reacting sodium carbonate and acetic .acid in the presence of a
polymer emulsion where the polymer is inert with respect to the sodium
carbonate
and acetic said such that the product retains the water of hydration sauraed
from
the emulsion while maintaining the integrity of the polymer in the resultant
product.
It is believed that the water in the emulsion is appropriated by the reaction
into
the resultant produot without affecting the water/polymer relationship.
According to the present invention, the process involves prawblendiri~ of
the ingredients of the sodium acetate trihyrlrate molecule with polymer
emulsions,
with the radium acetate using the water from the emulsion to cau$e the
relation
to take pleas and resulting in a dry product which in fact contains the
palymerie



- ' ~~~9;3 ~~
pa°oduat whose water based properties remain intact. This new praaess
allows complex
polymeric products, such as silicone emulsions, to be compounded into granular
products previously incompatible with the aqueous polymeric emulsions due to
their
water content. rn addition to silicone emulsions, this process has application
to
acrylic emulsions, surfactant solutions and polyvinylpyrrolidone solutions.
Ueseri~tion of the preferred J~mbodiment
' ,~ According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, dry
sodium carbonate is reacted with acetic acid and a polymer emulsion according
to
the following equation:
Na2COg * 2HAe + C51~20 ~ ~'olymer Emulsion? ~
2ENaAe ~ 3H20 ~ Polymer Emulsion Complex? ~ ,C02
The polymer is inert with respect to the sodium carbonate and acetic acid so
as to
maintain the integrity of the polymer during ttte reaction. Preferably, the
process
is performed at a mole ratio of acetic acid to the water content of the
polymer
emulsion that is two moles .of acetic acid to five moles of water. Also,
preferably,
the polymer emulsiat: is a high solids, non-erosslinklng, polymer emulsion. In
the
preferred embodiment, the polymer emulsion is selected from the group of
silicone
emulsions, acrylic emulsions, surfactant solutions, and polyvinylpyrrolidone
solutions.
The process is applicable to materials, such as sodium acetate, having water
of
hydration and would have no appliea,tion to materials that do not have water
of
hydration. '
The reaction is sufgieiently exothermic to create heat to dry the product.
The process of the present invention has been practiced according to the
following examples:
~xam,~i~ f
Using a silicone defoamer emulsion by Union Carbide known as Defoamer
S,A,G~30, 26.4 grams of dry sodium oarbanat~ was reaoted~wlth 30.B grams of
aoetia .
acid in the presence of a preblended mixture of 13.0 grams of water and 30.0
grams
of 1)efoamer SAQ-30. 'fhe reaction mixture was stirred, for appraxlmately 1.0
hour
to yield X9.2 grams of a product representing Defoamer SAG~30 In a more dilute
,.. ,. ,
but completely ,dry form.
- 2 ..



_. ~"~~i~~
E~campio II
Using a sili4one emulsion by Uniort Carbide known as I~E-458 H~, 2~.4
grams of dry sodium carbonate and 30.5 grams of acetic acid were reacted in
the
presence of a preblended mi~;ture of 3b.0 grams of LF-4a8 HS and 13.0 grams of
water°. The reaction mixture was stirred for approximately 1.0 hour to
yield 80.0
grams of a dry powdered form of LET458 H~ which was more dilute in
concentration
. than the original form of the product LE-458 HS.
E~campl~ ~
Using a 3096 solution of polyvinylpyz~rolidone, 28.4 grams of dry sodium
carbonate was reacted with 30.~ grams of acetic acid in the presence of 30.0
grams
of a 3096 polyvinylpyrrolidone solution. This reaction mixture was stirred for
approximately L0 hour to yield ?8.0 grams of a dry, more dilute
polyvinyipycrolidone.
It wiil therefore be readily understood by those persons s~iiied in the act
that the present . invention is susceptiblE; of a broad utiiity and
appiication. Many
embodiments and adaptations of the present Invention other than those hecein
described, as wall as many variations, modifieatioras and equivaient
arrangements wili
be apparent from or reasonably suggested by the present invention and the
foregoing ;
deseriptian thereof, without departing from the substance or scope of the
present
invention. Accordingly, while the present invention has beam described ~hecein
in
detail in relation to its preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that
this
disclosure is only illustrative and exemplary of the present invention and is
made
merely for purposes of providing a full and enabling disclosure of the
invention.
The foregoing disclosure is not intended or to be construed t~ limit the
pr~.sent
invention or otherwise to exclude any such other embodiments, adaptations,
variations,
modifications rind equivalent arrangements, the present invention being
limited only
~by the claims appended hereto and the equivalents thereof.
When used in the foilowing claims, the term polymer. emulsion is intended
to have a broad meaning encompassing not only polymer emulsions in a strict
sense,
but also materials, such as surfactant solutions and polyvinylpyrrolidane
solutions,
that have simiiar oharaeteristics in terms of the application of the process
of the
present invention.
,,
I
t'
~ . .r

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2003356 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2000-06-27
(22) Filed 1989-11-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1991-05-20
Examination Requested 1996-11-15
(45) Issued 2000-06-27
Deemed Expired 2007-11-20

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1997-11-20 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 1997-12-10
1998-11-20 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 1999-05-06

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1989-11-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1991-11-20 $50.00 1991-10-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1992-11-20 $50.00 1992-10-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1993-11-22 $50.00 1993-11-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1994-11-21 $75.00 1994-10-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1995-11-20 $75.00 1995-11-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1996-11-20 $75.00 1996-11-15
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1997-12-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1997-11-20 $75.00 1997-12-10
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1999-05-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 1998-11-20 $75.00 1999-05-06
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 1999-11-22 $100.00 1999-11-15
Final Fee $150.00 2000-03-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2000-11-20 $100.00 2000-11-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2001-11-20 $100.00 2001-11-20
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2002-09-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2002-11-20 $200.00 2002-10-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2003-11-20 $200.00 2003-11-03
Back Payment of Fees $225.00 2004-11-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2004-11-22 $225.00 2004-11-04
Back Payment of Fees $225.00 2005-11-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2005-11-21 $225.00 2005-11-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL, LLC
Past Owners on Record
HUGHES, RONALD E.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1994-05-07 1 17
Description 1994-05-07 3 173
Cover Page 2000-05-30 1 21
Cover Page 1994-05-07 1 15
Claims 1994-05-07 1 37
Fees 2001-11-20 1 30
Fees 2000-11-16 1 32
Correspondence 2000-03-29 1 46
Assignment 2002-09-30 6 265
Fees 1997-12-10 1 42
Fees 1999-05-06 1 33
Fees 1999-11-15 1 28
PCT Correspondence 1990-03-05 1 31
Office Letter 1990-07-05 1 15
Prosecution Correspondence 1996-11-15 2 48
Prosecution Correspondence 1997-01-13 1 27
Fees 1996-11-15 1 29
Fees 1995-11-11 1 30
Fees 1994-10-19 1 38
Fees 1993-11-10 1 29
Fees 1992-11-20 1 33
Fees 1991-10-09 1 24