Language selection

Search

Patent 2008431 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2008431
(54) English Title: BATTERY MONITORING SYSTEM
(54) French Title: SYSTEME DE CONTROLE DE BATTERIES
Status: Expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 320/12
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01R 31/3842 (2019.01)
  • G01R 31/367 (2019.01)
  • H02J 7/00 (2006.01)
  • G01R 31/374 (2019.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CLEGG, ANDREW SIMON (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • VANNER, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • OPALPORT ELECTRONICS LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2001-01-23
(22) Filed Date: 1990-01-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-07-24
Examination requested: 1997-01-24
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract




A battery monitoring system 10 supplies the user of a
battery power system with information indicating the capacity
remaining in the battery 9 during discharge. During discharge
the system 10 monitors various parameters and calculates on a
rapid sampling basis derived parameters from algorithms stored
in memory in tabulated form. The recharging efficiency is also
evaluated, stored and updated on each charge/discharge cycle so
that ageing of the battery 9 is monitored.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



14
CLAIMS:
1. A battery monitoring system comprising:
current measuring means for evaluating the level of
instantaneous current drawn from a battery when supplying a
load;
voltage measuring means for evaluating the level of
instantaneous battery voltage when the battery is supplying the
load;
means for selecting a final battery voltage level at
which the capacity of the battery is to be considered
exhausted; and
arithmetic means for continuously receiving
measurement values outputted from said means and for computing
continuously on a rapid sampling basis a measure of remaining
battery life;
wherein said arithmetic means comprises:
a first arithmetic unit for computing the
instantaneous power level delivered by the battery and for
evaluating continuously on a rapid sampling basis according to
a first predetermined algorithm the total discharge duration
(T) available from the battery when continuing to supply power
at the measured instantaneous power level based upon the
selected final battery voltage level;
a second arithmetic unit for evaluating continuously
on a rapid sampling basis according to a second predetermined
algorithm a measure of elapsed discharge time (t) from the
measured instantaneous battery voltage and battery current;
a third arithmetic unit for evaluating continuously
on a vapid sampling basis the remaining life of the battery if
it continues to supply power at the measured instantaneous
power level, by subtracting the measure evaluated by the second
arithmetic unit from that evaluated by the first arithmetic
unit; and wherein



15
(i) said first predetermined algorithm comprises a
hyperbolic equation of the form
T = a + b(i f )- 1 + c(i f )- 2
where a,b,c, are co-efficients which are a function
of the final battery voltage level anti which are held in sets
in a storage table to be outputted according to the selected
final battery voltage level; and
(ii) said second predetermined algorithm comprises a
cubic or higher order equation of the form
V = A+ Bt + Ct2+ Dt3
where A,B,C,D are co-efficients which are a function
of intantaneous battery current (i p), and which are held in
sets i.n a storage table to be outputted according to the
measured value of instantaneous battery current(i p), and V is
the measured value of instantaneous battery voltage.
2. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein a temperature
sensor is provided for monitoring battery temperature, the
temperature sensor output being connected to the current
measuring means to establish a temperature-corrected measure of
the instantaneous current drawn from the battery and which
temperature-corrected current measure is outputted to the
arithmetic means.
3. A system as claimed in claim 2, wherein the first
arithmetic unit and the second arithmetic unit each includes
interpolation means to establish co-efficients of value
intermediate those stored by the respective table.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





20086-2190
1
BATTERY MONI'rOR WHICH INDICATES REMAINING CAPACITY BY
CONTINUOUSLY MONITORING INSTANTANEOUS POWER CONSUMPTION
RELATIVE 'TO EXPECTED HYPERBOLIC DISCHARGE RATES
This invention relates to a battery monitoring
system.
In the use of battery operated equipment, such as
battery powered electric: vehicles and standby power systems, it
is desirable to monitor the battery in order to provide from
time to time a prediction informing the user of the remaining
capacity in the battery.
It is an. objects of the present invention to provide a
battery monitoring system.
According to t:he present invention a battery
monitoring system comprises current measuring means for
evaluating the level of instantaneous current drawn from a
battery when supplying a load voltage measuring means for
evaluating the level of instantaneous battery voltage when the
battery is supplying the load; means for selecting a final
battery voltage level at: which the capacity of the battery is
to be considered exhausted; and arithmetic means for
continuously receiving measurement values outputted form said
means and for computing continuously on a rapid sampling basis
a measure of remaining battery life; wherein said arithmetic
means comprises: a first: arithmetic unit for computing the
instantaneous power level delivered by the battery and for
evaluating continuously on a rapid sampling basis according to
a first predetermined algorithm the total discharge duration
(T) available from. the battery when continuing to supply power
at the measured instantaneous power level based upon the
selected final battery voltage level; a second arithmetic unit
for evaluating continuously on a rapid sampling basis according
to a second predetermined algorithm a measure of elapsed
discharge time (t) from the measured instantaneous battery
voltage and battery current; a third arithmetic unit for




20086-2190
2
evaluating continuously on a rapid sampling basis the remaining
life of the battery if it continues to supply power at the
measured instantaneous power level, by subtracting the measure
evaluated by the ;second arithmetic unit from that evaluated by
the first arithmetic un_Lt; and wherein (i) said first
predetermined algorithm comprises a hyperbolic equation of the
form
T = a + b(i f )- 2 + c(i f )- 2
where a,b,c, are c:o-eff~~_cients which are a function of the
final battery voltage level and which are held in sets in a
storage table to ~>e outputted according to the selected final
battery voltage level; and (i) said second predetermined
algorithm comprises a cubic equation of the form
V = A+ Bt + Ct2+ Dt:3
where A,B,C,D are co-eff=icients which are a function of
instantaneous battery current (ip), and which are held in sets
in a storage table to be outputted according to the measured
value of instantar..eous battery current(ip), and V is the
measured value of instantaneous battery voltage.
An emboo.iment of the present invention will now be
described with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
Fig. 1 schematically illustrates a battery monitoring system
according to the present: invention; and
Fig. 2 illustrates in graphical form details useful for an
understanding of the Fiq. 1 system.
A battery monitoring system 10 in accordance with the
present invention is illustrated in Fig. 1 and monitors the
condition of battery 9 which is connected to supply a load 8.
System 10 comprises a first evaluating arrangement 11 for
evaluating the level of instantaneous current drawn from the
battery 9, and a second evaluating arrangement 12 for
evaluating the level of instantaneous battery voltage. The
outputs of arrangements 11 and 12 are fed to a third
A




2~G~~~~~1
- 3 -
arrangement 1;3 whic:E~ computes the level of instantaneous
power delivered by the battery. A fourth arrangement 14,
in this embodiment ~~ontaining a preset value, determines a
final voltage level for the battery 9 when the capacity of
the battery is exhausted and the outputs of arrangements
13 and 14 are delivered to a fifth arrangement 15 which
evaluates the estimated final battery current. The output
of arrangement. 15, 'together with the output of arrangement
14, is delivez-ed to a sixth arrangement 16 for calculating
IO according to a fir st predetermined algorithm (as will be
explained) the: total discharge duration of the battery 9.
The outputs of =he first and second arrangements 11,
12, in addition to :~eing fed to the third arrangement 13
are fed to a :event.': arrangement 17 which is arranged to
1~ evaluate according v~ a second predetermined algorithm (as
will be explained) _e accumulated discharge duration and
the outputs of: the :_=xth and seventh arrangements I6, 17,
are fed to an eightl: arrangement 18 which evaluates the
remaining discharge Duration available from the battery 9.
20 The algorithms which are used in the system 10 are
formulated on the basis of the output from first arrangement
11 being in a norma:iised form, in part this simply being a
percentage of the ten hour discharge rate but in part being
modified by variations in temperature o.~. the battery 9 with
25 respect to a F~redet~er:nined temperature (usually 15°C) .
Accordingly, a temperature sensor 21 is provided for sensing
battery temperature and the output of sensor 21 operates an




2~CL~43~.
- 4 -
arrangement 2?. to establish a temperature correction factor
which is fed t:o the first arrangement 11. The arrangement
11 therefore <:omprises a current sensor 11A, a temperature
normalising unit 11'.9 and a scaling unit 11C.
The second arrangement 12 comprises a voltage sensor
12A, a preset store 12B containing the number of individual
cells within t:he specific battery 9 and an arithmetic unit
12C :which provides t.e output for arrangement 12 so that
the output is measured volts per cell. The third arrange-
ment 13 evaluates the level of instantaneous power delivered
by the batter~~ by multiplication of the values delivered
to it by the first <~nd second arrangements 11, 12. The
your ~h arrange:me.~. t 1 ~ is provided in this example in a
preset manner, with ~ze final voltage level of each cell
13 and the fifth ar=an<:_.-.;ent 15 contains a calculating unit
'_3~ v~hich by ciiv_sio_-_ of the power value delivered to it
by arrangement: 13 a~:c the voltage measure delivered by
arrangement 1~E et;alu~tes the final current and this is
scaled by unit: 1~3 v~ the ten hour discharge rate.
The sixth a=ra~:~ement 16 comprises an arrangement 16A
which stores a f~rs~t set of co-efficients and which is
arranged to output a single set of such co-efficients to
unit 16B accoz-ding ~t~ the voltage value provided to unit
16A by arrangement :L-~. Unit 16B is a Calculation unit
which evaluates a hyperbolic equation having specified co-
efficients as delivered by unit 16A and a specified
variable as delivered by unit 15B. The evaluation of this



~t~~~~~31
- 5 -
hyperbolic equation establishes a total duration of
battery discharge.
The seventh arrangement 17 comprises a unit 17A which
stores a table of second co-efficients and according to
the value of scaled current delivered to it by unit 11C
provides a specific set of such second co-efficients to a
calculating unit 17B which is arranged to evaluate the
accumulated discharge time from a predetermined cubic
equation relating instantaneous voltage with accumulated
discharge time.
The eighth unit 18 is arranged to subtract the values
delivered to it by u:.its 16 and 17 to thereby provide a
measure of the remaining time to final discharge of the
battery 9. Arrange:~ent 18 may also express the remaining
1~ discharge time avai_a:ole as a percentage of the total
discharge time or ma-: express the accumulated discharge
tine as a percentage of the total discharge time.
The cubic equation evaluated by unit 17B is derived
from graphical data =rovided by battery manufacturers
expressing the relat_onship between measured battery
voltage and accumula~ed discharge time for a particular .
level of instantaneous current. It has been found that
the divergence between the graphical data and the cubic
equation is minimal as illustrated by Fig. 2 and by storing
sets of co-efficients in unit 18A for particular values of
current a substantial reduction of storage space is achieved
together with an increased ability to interpolate for




._. ~~C8~~3~.
- 6 -
unstored set.; of co-efficients. Likewise the hyperbolic
equation eva:Luated by unit 16B is derived from graphical
data provided by battery manufacturers expressing the
total discharge period to a particular value of final
battery voltage for a series of specific values of
instantaneous battery voltage and the divergence between
the hyperbol:Lc equation and the graphical data is
negligible. Interpolation of unstored co-efficients for
the hyperbolic equation is readily effected by unit 16A.
By way of operation of the system 10 a specific
example will now be evaluated for a battery of the lead acid
CP17 type having t he following parameters:
Ampere hour rate 800 = 10 hour capacity
Vo. of cells 164
Temperature cc~r=ection factor to per °C
dated temper a-t::= a 15 ° C
Final voltage 294
r final volti ce:L' 1. 79
'~he 'ollowinc~ measurements are taken:
Current 146 Amperes
Voltage 314.8 Volts
Temperature 20°C
1) Sensor l.lA measures the present current (iin) flowing
through the x>attery leads as + 146 amps, the positive sign
indicating treat the= battery is being dischazged.
Unit 11F~ normalises iin to rated temperature (15°C)
and because t:he measured temperature in the battery room is




20086-2190
1
7
20°C the temperature correction factor provided by unit 22 is:
tempco =- 1 + (20 - 15) x (1/100) - 1.05
so that the tempez~ature--corrected discharge current (it) is
146.0 - 1.05 = 139.05
Unit 11C; calculates current in terms of the 10 hour
capacity of the battery,, to give a percentage so that ip the
output of arrangement 11 is:
ip = (l~>9.05 x 100) . 800 = 17.380
2) Sensor 1.2A measures the battery voltages as 314.8
volts d.c.
Unit 12E~ divides the battery voltage by the number of
cells (164) to give cel7_ voltage:
vin = 31.4.8 / 164 = 1.9195
3) Arrangement 13 calculates power demand.
Power = vin x it = 1.9195 x 139.05 = 266.90 watts
4) Unit 15P, calculates final current
if = power / of (vf is the preset final voltage, i.e.
1.79 established in arrangement 14).
if = 26E~.90 / 1.79 = 149.11 amps and this is scaled
by unit 15B to be 18.640 of the 10 hour capacity.
5) Arrangement 16 calculates the finish time T, using
final current (if) from a hyperbolic equation of the form
T = a + bi f- 1 + ci f- 2
where the hyperbolic co-efficients (a,b,c) are stored in unit
16A for specified final voltage values; e.g.
a




20086-2190
2on8431a
Final volts a b c


1.85 -111.738 6662.29 3942.7


1.83 - 95.1394 6645.34 5171.71


1.81 - 87.7079 6939.18 3580.98


1.79 - 74.9541 6913.18 3857.27


1.77 - 65.1906 6880.4 4634.92


1.75 - 56.4163 6826.9 5202.11


From the above table unit 16A selects the co-efficients for the
set end point voltage of 1.79:
1.79 - 74.9541 6913.18 3857.27
and the finish time T for the specified final current of 18.640
is calculated using the hyperbolic equation:
T = -74.9541 ~- (6913 / 18.64) + (3857.27 / (18.64)2
- 307.06
6) Unit 17 calculates the accumulated discharge time t
from a cubic or higher order equation of the form
V = a + bt - ct2 + dt3
where the cubic ca-efficients (a, b, c, d) are stored in unit
17A for specified levels of current ip, e.g.
t



2QC~:~3~.
TABLE - 9 -
I


a b c d


172 1.655 -4.392 E-3 5.426 E-4 -2.127 E-4


142 1.710 -5.985 E-3 -4.174 E-4 2.164 E-5


106 1.776 -4.722 E-3 2.348 E-5 -2.609 E-6


88 1.804 -2.839 E-3 -1.082 E-5 -7.787 E-7


71 1.837 -1.240 E-3 -2.965 E-5 -1.203 E-7


60 1.852 -7.024 E-2 -3.478 E-2 6.184 E-3


36.9 1.'13 -4.214 E-2 -4.087 E-3 3.903 E-3


27 1.40 -3.234 E-2 5.836 E-3 -3.533 E-3


21.6 1.951 -1.648 E-2 6.957 E-4 -1.331 E-3


18 1.'364 -1.382 E-2 5.565 E-5 -5.936 E-4


17.38 1.'36496 -1.432 E-2 5.77 E-4 -5.8 E-4


15.5 1.'368 -1.592 E-2 2.232 E-3 -5.632 E-4


13.6 1.'372 -1.361 E-2 2.811 E-3 -5.399 E-4


1~ 12.1 1.'371 -1.277 E-2 2.092 E-3 -3.312 E-4


11 1.~a82 -1.310 E-2 2.065 E-3 -2.759 E-4


10 1.386 -9.299 E-3 1.381 E-3 -1.860 E-4


(where 10 2 etc.
E-2 rs=preser.~s )


Accordingly equation is:
'the
cubic


V - a ~~- b c t2 + d.t3
t


We know the followingvariables


V - cell volta ge - 1.9195


a - calculated coefficient - 1.96496


b - calculated coefficient - -0.01432


c - c,alculatedcoefficient - 0.000577


d - c,alculatedcoefficient - -0.00058


and unit 17B solves this equation, by iteration, for t, the



~c~c~.~~~.
- 10 -
result being t = lEil minutes.
7) Arrangement 18 evaluates the remaining time as the
difference between ::final time and present time
- 307 -~ 161
- 146 minutes
so that if th.e discharge continues at the present rate the
battery will last f:or a further 146 minutes.
Additionally arrangement 18 may evaluate the percent
discharge remaininc; as
(Remaining time / finish time) x 100
- (146 / 307) x 100
- 47.56
so that the battery ~:as 47.5 of its charge remaining.
It will be apt:==ciated that in the foregoing example,
1, =er oth the cubic nd hyperbolic equations the sets of
stored co-eff:icient= and their identifier contain an
identifier ec;ual in -ralue to that pr~uced by arrangement 11
and by arrangement .4 but, particularly for arrangement 11
which output: a me~~~;zre of instantaneous current which is
likely continuously to change, there is no guarantee that
the evaluated currEe~t value is identical to an identifier
within store unit :17A. Accordingly, unit 17A is adapted
to interpolate between the nearest stored identifiers and
their stored co-ef:ficients to obtain the required identifier
and required co-ef:~icients.
For example, :in the event that the identifier and its
co-efficients are not stored in unit 17A interpolation is




20086-2190
11
made between the co-efficients stored for stored identified
18.0 and those of stored identified 15.5 (see the previous
Table I) by calculating the ratio that 17.38 is between 15.5
and 18.0 (760) and for each stored co-efficient evaluating the
interpolated value. Thus, taking co-efficients a as the
example:
a = (1.964 - 1.968) x 0.76 + 1.968
- 1.9E>5
Interpolation may be carried out on a similar basis
by unit 16A in the case where the final voltage Vf is not a
preset value as dictated by the battery manufactures which is
normally a value specifically contained as an identifier in
store unit 16A.
It will be understood that in the system 10 which has
been described the system outputs on a continuous (very rapid
sampling) bases the prediction of the battery capacity
remaining at any point in time and this prediction can, if so
desired, be used to set or operate alarm devices guarding the
battery and load arrangement.
The system 10 may be modified to incorporate a self-
learning regime by comparing the projected discharge of the
battery 9 with the actual discharge by means of which the
system 10 self-adjusts for inefficiencies of the battery and
load arrangement and for battery ageing. This is achieved
using "electrically erasable programmable




~~~i~~~a~~.
- 12 -
read only memory" (EEPROM). Each time a discharge
ta:ces place, the system 10 records all the vital parameters
and then integrates them with previously stored derived
measurements.
For example calculations made during the discharge
and recharge of the battery allow the system to calculate
the effective "charging efficiency". That is to say
the percenta~~e of energy that has to be returned to the
battery in order to return it to the fully charged state
or to a predetermined percentage thereof. To achieve
this the system stores the following data for each
charge/disch~~rge cycle:
Battery energ.~ level at end of discharge (EEPD).
Energy :returnee to battery during recharge (ER).
l~ Battery energ-: level at start of next discharge (ESND).
The charging effici=ncy can be expressed as:-
ESND - EEPD
Charge l~fficie_ncy (CE) - X 100
ER
The result from eac:: charge/discharge cycle is integrated
into a continuous sore, the "historical charge efficiency".
The system therefore "learns" the charging efficiency of
the battery, load and charging unit.
Logging of previous recharge rates, times and
efficiencies allow the system to indicate the predicted




20086-2190
13
recharge time required to return the battery to a charge state.
In order to calculate the required recharge time the system
records one further parameter:-
Charge Fate (C:R) Expressed in Ampere/minutes and
derives
Depth of- Discharge (DD) as o Fully Charged energy
level
The recharge time then can be expressed as:-
Charge Time (minutes) - DD X BC
CE CR
where BC is the Battery Capacity expressed in Ampere/minutes.
All the above variables are stored in electrically erasable
programmable read only memory (EEPROM).

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2001-01-23
(22) Filed 1990-01-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1991-07-24
Examination Requested 1997-01-24
(45) Issued 2001-01-23
Expired 2010-01-24

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
1998-01-26 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 1999-01-22

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1990-01-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1990-08-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1992-01-24 $50.00 1992-01-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1993-01-25 $50.00 1992-12-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1994-01-24 $50.00 1993-12-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1995-01-24 $75.00 1995-01-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1996-01-24 $75.00 1995-12-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1997-01-24 $75.00 1997-01-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1997-04-03
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1999-01-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1998-01-26 $150.00 1999-01-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 1999-01-25 $150.00 1999-01-22
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1999-01-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 1999-01-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2000-01-24 $200.00 2000-01-24
Final Fee $300.00 2000-10-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2001-01-24 $200.00 2000-12-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2002-01-24 $200.00 2002-01-21
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2003-01-24 $200.00 2002-10-31
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2004-01-26 $200.00 2003-11-25
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2005-01-24 $450.00 2004-12-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2006-01-24 $450.00 2005-12-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2007-01-24 $650.00 2007-04-05
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-08-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2008-01-24 $450.00 2007-11-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2009-01-26 $450.00 2008-11-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
VANNER, INC.
Past Owners on Record
CLEGG, ANDREW SIMON
ELLIOTT INDUSTRIES LIMITED
OPALPORT ELECTRONICS LIMITED
PM-MENDES (INTERNATIONAL) LIMITED
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative Drawing 1999-07-15 1 38
Representative Drawing 2000-12-21 1 12
Cover Page 1993-12-14 1 15
Abstract 1993-12-14 1 17
Claims 1993-12-14 2 63
Drawings 1993-12-14 2 65
Description 1993-12-14 13 437
Abstract 2000-01-27 1 15
Description 2000-01-27 13 434
Claims 2000-01-27 2 80
Drawings 2000-01-27 2 39
Cover Page 2000-12-21 1 33
Cover Page 2001-06-21 1 32
Cover Page 2001-06-29 2 68
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-06-29 2 50
Fees 2003-11-25 1 36
Fees 1998-02-23 2 123
Prosecution-Amendment 1997-01-24 23 674
Correspondence 1999-04-16 1 1
Correspondence 1999-04-16 1 2
Assignment 1990-01-24 16 600
Correspondence 2001-05-10 1 46
Correspondence 1999-04-16 3 80
Correspondence 2000-10-16 1 39
Fees 1999-01-22 1 49
Fees 2002-10-31 1 39
Fees 2000-01-24 1 41
Fees 2004-12-24 1 33
Fees 2005-12-29 1 34
Assignment 2007-08-29 12 270
Fees 2007-11-01 1 30
Correspondence 2007-12-20 2 57
Correspondence 2008-01-17 1 15
Correspondence 2008-01-17 1 12
Fees 2008-11-05 1 30
Fees 1995-12-19 1 38
Fees 1995-01-11 1 43
Fees 1993-12-24 1 33
Fees 1992-12-23 1 33
Fees 1992-01-24 2 66