Language selection

Search

Patent 2019642 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2019642
(54) English Title: CLEANING COMPOSITION
(54) French Title: NETTOYANT
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C11D 3/30 (2006.01)
  • C11D 3/22 (2006.01)
  • C11D 3/37 (2006.01)
  • C11D 3/43 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DAWSON, PETER LEONARD (United Kingdom)
  • STIRLING, THOMAS (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • UNILEVER PLC
(71) Applicants :
  • UNILEVER PLC (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: BERESKIN & PARR LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L.,S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1994-12-27
(22) Filed Date: 1990-06-22
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1990-12-23
Examination requested: 1991-06-05
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
8914462.0 (United Kingdom) 1989-06-23

Abstracts

English Abstract


An aqueous cleaning composition suitable for hard surfaces
contains ammonia or an alkanolamine having a boiling point below 200°C
at atmospheric pressure, plus a cationic polymer having a molecular
weight over 5,000, in an aqueous system containing an organic solvent
which has a boiling point below 200°C at atmospheric pressure;
preferably with at most a limited amount of surfactant and other
materials which do not boil below 200°C at atmospheric pressure.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


21
THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. An aqueous cleaning composition comprising 0.1-10% by weight
of ammonia or alkanolamine having a boiling point below 200°C at
atmospheric pressure and 0.001 to 0.5% of a cationic polymer having
a molecular weight over 5,000,
in a solvent system comprising water and optionally up to 10%
by weight of an organic solvent which has a boiling point below
200°C at atmospheric pressure or has an evaporation rate greater than
0.01 times that of n-butyl acetate at 20°C;
the composition being substantially free of inorganic electrolyte
and containing at most 0.5% by weight of surfactant, all the above
percentages being based on the whole composition.
2. A composition according to claim 1 wherein the amount of
cationic polymer is from 0.001 to 0.05% by weight and the total
amount of surfactant and any other materials which do not boil below
200°C at atmospheric pressure does not exceed 0.5% by weight.
3. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 containing from
0.001% to 0.2% of surfactant.

22
4. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the
cationic polymer has a molecular weight of at least 50,000, and has
cationic groups on not more than 35% of its repeat units.
5. A composition according to claim 1 containing at least 0.05%
of the said organic solvent.
6. A composition according to claim 5 wherein the solvent has an
alkyl group of up to five carbon atoms together with at least one
hydroxyl group;
7. A composition according to claim 6 wherein the solvent is of
formula:
R-OH
R-O-CH2-CH2-OH
<IMG>
or
<IMG>
wherein R is C3 to C5 alkyl.
8. A composition according to claim 6 wherein the solvent is a
monohydric alcohol or a monoalkyl ether of a diol.
9. A composition according to claim 8 wherein the solvent is
methoxy propanol or methoxy propoxy propanol.

23
10. A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the
alkanolamine is monoethanolamine.
11. Method of cleaning fixed, rigid, inanimate surfaces comprising
applying thereto the composition of claim 1 or claim2.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


201~t~42
~ C~321
CLEAN}NO COMPOSITION
~ his invention ~lates to an aqueous cleanln~
compo~ition lntended ~o be sultable for UBe undlluted in
cleaning var$ous su~face~ notably flxed sur~ace~
exempl~fled by gla s, palntwork, ~eramic tlle3, vinyl
floor$ng, ~h~omium plate, ma~ble and plastia laminates.
It is int~nded th~t rinsiny snould b~ ~nnecessary.
Existin~ ~eneral pu~pose cleaning prod~cts which
are intended for household use ~ene~ally c~e~n effeotively
~ut then need rlns~ns or ~ubgequent buff$ng to o~tain a
goo~ result, particula~ly on hl~ gloss s~faces like
glass or chrome. Exist~n~ products spec~fically for
w~ndow ~1 eaning often recommend u~ing the proauct in
lS lim~ tea quan~ity, then rubbin~ ~y with ~ ~ry cloth in
order to avoid streaks or smear~ In pr~t~ce usage is
o$ten at above th~ r~r~ n~o~ level, and r~blng
completely ~y can be diff1oult. As t~e cleanin~ ~ob
y~y~esses~ the users' ~loth will, of cours~, h~o~ wet
with soiled product solutlon absor~e~ by the ~loth. These
factors often lead to visible aeposits belng left on the
window or mlrro~.
At least ~n preferre4 forms, this invention
~eeks to prov~de a produ~t which wlll glve a sood flnish
to the surface belng cleaned despite u~a~e at higher
levels than neceRsary and/o~ incompl~te removal. I~ is
intended that no vlsible res~due shoul~ remain on the
su~face wh~ ha8 been cleaned~
~ '

20196~2
Accordlng to the present ~nventlon, the~e ls
prov~ded an aqueous cle~ning ~o~poslt~ on comprlsing:
0.1-10~ by we~sht of~ammonia or an al~anolamine
having a boil~ng point below 200nC at stmospherio pres~u~e
and 0.001 to 0.5%, better 0.001 to 0.05% of cationic
polymer having a molecular weight ove~ 5000:
in a solvent system comp~isin~ wate~ and
optionally up to 10~ by welyht of an o~ganic ~olvent whioh
~a~ a boillng point b~low 200-C at atmospheric pressu~e or
has an evaporation rate greater than 0.01 times that of
n-butyl acetate at ~0C, an~ pre~erably in~ludes an ~l~yl
group of 1 to 5 carbon atomæ, such as a propyl, butyl or
pentyl ~oup, to~ether with ~t lea~t one hydroxyl group;
the compositlon being substantially free of
lnorganio electrolyte and c~ntain$ng at ~ost 0.~% by
weight of surfactant. All ~he above percenta~es are base~
on the whole oomposition.
In thls invention, it is strongly p~eferred that
the total amount of surfaotant and any other materials
which do not boll below 200~C at atmospheric p~essure does
not ~YO~ 0.~% better 0.2~ ~y weight bas~d on the whole
compo~itlon.
P~efera~ly, the said organ~ ~olvent ls p~esent
in an amount w~$ch is at lea~t 0~05~ bette~ from 0.5 to
10% by we~ght.
Compositions of this invention have a ve~y large
proportion of oonstituents which a~e suffioiently vol~t~le
for ~es$dues of them to evapor2te from the surface. The

201 ~642
p~operty of bo~ling below 200~C at no~mal atmosphe~lo
pre~su~e of 760mm~g i~ an ~ndicator of adequat~
volat~lity.
The alternative asse~sment o~ volatil$ty by
comparison of evaporation rate with that of n-butyl
~cet8te, is a m~thod of ~ua~lng volat~llty whloh ~s
frequently used ln the solvent lndusty.
When the c~position ls applled, say with a clot~, the
bulk of the composition and solubilised soll wlll be
~emo~ed by t~e cloth w~th ~hich it i8 spplied and/or a
second cloth used subseguently. Most ~f the res~due left
on the su~face w~ll evaporate~ Polar o~anic ~ompoun~
with boilinçl polnts o~r 200 C generally do not have
suffl~ient volatility fo~ thl~: consequ~ntly the level of
them is pr~ferably very low, as stated above.
P~ef~red and essentl~l oonstltuen~s will now be
discussed.
Preferably any organlc solvent is sufflciently
water soluble to give a sin~le phas~ solvent syste~.
However, it ~s posslble to u~e a golvent of low wat8~
solubillty and include ~uffic~ent solvent that there is a
surplus of organlc solvent forming a ~eparate phas~ This
oould be ~ispersea aR an emulsion, o~ dist~ibuted through
the product by æhaking the container be~ore use.
~5 T}~e p2~Q~e~e~ olas~ of o~gan~c ~olvents a~e
t~ose ~hich havq both hydroxyl funotionali~y and an alkyl
group which i~ Cl to C5, preferably C3 to C5 alkyl. In
thls latter aa~e, of course, the solvent wll 1 pro~lde ~

201~6~2
combinatlon of -y~loph~ lio and hy~G~hob~ ~un~tlons, ~o
that pr~erre~ solvQnts bring about a lo~ering of gu~face
ten~ion as well a~ helping to so~ubllise oily soils.
The C3 to C5 alkyl group may ~e linked di~ectly
to hydroxyl as ~n the case of aliphati~ alcohols or it may
be o~nnected th~o~gh ~ llnk~ ng group cont~ining ~oth
carbon ato~S and an atom othe~ ~han ~arbon or hyd~ogen -
usually oxygen.
8ultable as ~rganic solvent~ are those of10 st~uctural formu~a:
R-X-OH
where R 18 Cl to C$ alk~l a~d X i8 a covalent bond or
OCH2CH2
H21C
CH3
-O-CH-CH2_
CH3
-OC~H2C:H-CH2 -
OH
o
-C-O-CH2C~12-
~
-C-O-CH2-
O
_o_ `_C~2_
or even -OC2~40HC2H4- or -OC3H6 3 6

4 ~
but ln all cases aub~ect to the requlrement for ~ bolllng
polnt below ~00C.
Suit~ble so~ven~s ha~ins a formula as deflned
above include methanol, ethanol and the vario~s lsomers of
propanol, butanol an~ pentanol, 2-~LGpoxye~hanol,
~-~utoxyethanol, 2-p~ntoxye~hanol, 1-~.opGh~propan-2-ol
and
l-~utoxypropan-2-ol.
Examples of less wAter soluble ~olvent~ whlch
m~y be ~ncluded, giv~ng mo~e th~n one phase, are
paraffins, olef~ns, teL~n2s ~nd al~yl benzenes, subJect
~n each ins~ance to the r~quirement that the boil~ng point
is below 200C.
~he ammonla or alkanolam~e gerves to ~end~ the
compo~itlon alkaline, whi~h is benefic~al for cleanln~
psrformance. Al~ano~ ne~ are preferred ove~ ammonia;
the~r hyd~oxy functlon s~rves to e~An~e water so~ub~lity
and the am~no group contri~utes ~o the solubilisat~on of
polar fatty 8011~.
An ~lkanolam~e meeting the requlrement fo~
boiling point below 200'C will generally be a
monoalkanolam~ne, whose structural formula is:
R2
R -Nl3
whe~e Rl is hyd~oxy alkyl an~ R2 and R3 are (independently
of each other) ei~her hydrogen or alkyl.

2~ 1 96~2
The n~-~he~ o~ carbon a~oms in th~ groups Rl, R2,
R $g restriated by th~ requ~rement that the ~olling point
i~ not o~er 200C. ~ene~ally not more than four ~arbon
stoms will be pre~ent in total ln the groups Rl, R2 and
S ~ .
Monosthanol~mine ~8 the pre~erred oompound.
Further possib~lit~es incl~de 2-am~no 2-methyl prop~no~,
2-amlnoprGpanol, n-propanolamine,-2-amino l-butanol,
~-methyl ethanolamine and ~,N-dimethyl ethanolamine.
The amount of alkanolamlne may be up to 10% by
weight of the composi~ion~ P~efera~ly, ~t~ r, the
guantity is not ~reater than 5~, ~inCe quantitieS ln
c~s of 5% p~oduce ll~tle a~di~ional ~enefit in r~turn
for ths ex~ra ~ost. The amoun~ of al~anolamlne ~s
prefera~ly a~ least 0.5%~
The ~at~on~, polymer enhsnoe~ the ab~llty o~ ~he
compo~ition to rem~e particulats ~0~18. Without being
ted ~y our hypothesls a~ to its mo~e o~ act~on, lt is
believed th~t ~he polymer 1s sble to oauge a~y~y~tion of
part~cu~ate soil pa~tiol~s wlthout the d~ea~vantage of
cauqin~ e~ive agg~egation and interfe~enae w~th
de~e~ cy, 40r example by bind~ng the ~oil ~articles to
the surface. Presu~a~ly then the ~esulting largs~
particles are more easily pic~e~ up by a ~loth be~n~ used
~S to wipe th~ su~face be~ng ~leaned.
A varlety of cationi~ polymer~ can be used. It
i~ preferred thst the mole~ular wei~ht of the polymer ~s
at least 10,000 bet~er at least 50,000 ~ even better at

2~6~2
least 100,0~0. I~ may be 8 high mol~cula~ ~ei~ht o at
leagt 1 milli~n o~ even ~t l~ast 5 mill~on up to 20
milllon or more at the t~me of adding the polyme~ to the
camposition, althou~h there may ~e some breakdown in the
5 len~th of polymer ~ n~ in the a~mpos~tion.
Cationi~ polymers yenerally conslst ~f a
polymer~c ch~in w~ ch does not have cAtionlc charac~er,
bearlng catlonic sub~titute ~roup~.
Certain cationic polymers can lnteract with
anionic or amp~oteri~ surfactants, r~d~c~g the
effect$vene~s of both. We hav~ found that if an~o
sur~actant i~ present, wlthin the l~mit o~ 0.5% ~y weigh~
surfaatan~, then it ~s desirable to use a cation~c polymer
wlth a hydrophil~c polymer ~hain ~ . poly~c~,~rlde or
polyacrylsm~e) and not more ~han 50% (molar) cat~onic
sùbst~ tu~ion on th~ s chain. Preferably les~ ~han 3~% or
even less than ~0~ of the ~epeat units in the poly~er
chain have cationic gubstitut~on, an~ pogsibly a~ few as
10~ are 80 substituted.
If anionic ~urfactant ~8 abgent, a wide range of
ca~ionic polymers can ~e used, inclu~ing cationi~ polymers
~sed on hyd~ophobic polymer ~hains such ag polye~hylene
or polymethylene.
Cationia polymers whi~h may ~e used ~n
comp~s~tlon~ of this invention include;
a) Polyacrylamides and polymethacry~amid~ made by
copolymer~ation of acrylamide or m~thacryl~mide with e.g.
~lmethylamino-ethylmsthacrylate ~follo~ed ~y

- 20 1 9642
quaternlsation wi~ d~methyl sulphate) os NN-dimethyl 3,5
methylen~ pip~r~ din~um chlor~d~. Alternat~vely,
poly~meth)acrylami~es treated w~th nlk~l~ne hyr~h~or~te
or with an amine an~ formaldehyds provi~e ca~isn~ y
su~stltuted polyacryl ~t~8.
~3 Stsrche~ treated w~th e.~. (4-chloro~utene-2)-
tr~methyl ammon$um ohloride, or ~ diethylamino ethyl
chlorlde hydrochlor~de, or dimethylam~no ethyl
methacrylat~, or 2,3-epo~yp~op~l tr~methyl ammon~um
~hloride. In partioular, ~r sums and ~.y~ro~yethyl
oellul~se~ cationised thus are ugeful.
a) ~omopoly~er o~ N,N-dimethyl-3,5 methylene
piperid~nium chloride or ethylsne imine. Polyethylene
imines and poly~mine~ d~monstrate u~eful cationio
cha~ 6~ Up to pH's of ~-~l which are prefe red for this
invention.
It is a~vanta~eou~ for compoe~t~ons of this
invent~on to ~ n~ e some dete~e..~ aotl~e. However,
beaau~e of the ~nte~d~d use wlthout r~s~, the ~uantity
~0 o~ d~ ~e ~ nt aative ie restriate~ to at most ~5% by
wel~ht of the co.~oaitlon, e.~. 0.~1 to 0.~, p~e~erably
not over 0.2~, while inorg~nic electrolyte ls
sub~tantlally absent~
Detsr~snt actives which are used may be c~osen
from the convention~1 class~, that ~s to ~ay anion~c,
nonloni~, cat~onic and amphoteric detergents and ~ixtures
thereof. Anion~c detergent ~cti~ss are prsferred for ~e
sa~e af their good deter~ency, b~t as stated above, so~e

2~19642
cat~onic polymer~ c~nnot be u~ed with ~n$onic de~r~ents,
~or which reason nonionio detergent active may b~
preferred, In general, anlonlc, catlonl~ and ampho~eric
deter~ent acti~es cont~in an alkyl group of 8 to 22 aarbon
atoms, or an alkyl aromatio g~oup with ~ to 14 carbon
atoms in the alkyl portlon, and a char~ed hea~ group.
Speciflo possibilltles for ~n~onlc detergent
act~v~s are so~lum C10 12 alkyl be~ns sulphonates and
~o~ium ~1~ 15 syn~hetic alcohol 3EO ~ulph3tes. C10 16
secon~ry alkane sulphonates are f~ther pos81bilities.
Nonionlo dete~ent aotives m~y be compounds
produced by the ~ondensation of alkylene oxide groups,
which are hydrophll$c in nature, wi~h an organio
hydrophobic cG,.~ound whlch may b~ aliphAt~o o~ alkyl
a~omatio in nature. The length of the hydrophilla o~
polyoxyalkylene radioal whio~ i8 oonden~ea with any
parti~ul~r hydrophobic group oan be a~usted to y~eld a
wate~-solu~le ~omr~n~ h~ving the des~red aog~ee of
balance between hydrophllic an~ ~yd~ophohic elements.
Partloular examples inclu~e the conden~ation product of
aliphatlc alcohols having f~om 8 to 22 oarbon a~oms in
either ~tr~lght or branche~ chaln configuration with
ethylene oxi~e, such 3s a coqonut oll ethylene oxide
contensate hsvln~ from 2 to 15 moles of ethylene oxlde per
2S mol~ of cooonut alcohol, and cond~n~ates of ~ynthet~o
prim~ry or seoondary aloohols hav~ n~ 8 to 15 oar~on atomg
with 3 to 12 moles of ethylene oxlde per mols o~ the
synthet~o alcohol: also condensates of alkylphenol8 whose

~ 0 ~ 2
alkyl group contain~ from 6 to 12 carbon ato~s wlth S to
25 moles o~ ethylene oxlde per ~ole of alkylph~nol.
~u~h~r example~ o~ nonion~c s~rfactants are con~n.~te~
of the reaction product of ethylenedlam~ne and y~o~ylene
ox~de with ethylene ox~de, the con~ tes ~ont~ n~ from
40 to 80~ of polyoxy~thylene ~a~ica~ by w~i~ht ~nd having
a mole~u~ar wei~ht of from S,000 to 11,000; also ~lock
copolymer~ ~f ~thylene ox~d~ and propylene oxide.
Nonionic ~eter~ent a~tives may be compoun~s
containi~ a C8 ~o C22 alkyl group and a polar hea~ ~roup
(which may o~ may not ~e pro~i~e~ by alkylene oxi~e
residues). ~r~s are tert~ary amine ~t~5 o~ ~o~mu~
RRlRlNO
where the g~oup R 1~ an alkyl group of 8 to 18 carbon
atoms a~d the groups Rl are èach methyl, ethyl or
hydroxyethy~ groups, for instance dimethy~o~e~vylamine
oxide; ~lycosi~e~ or poly~ly~,o~ G~ .ifie~ wlth at
least ~ne C8-C22 alkyl ~-oup or ~s~e~f$ed with at least
one C8-C22 fatty acyl group: fatty a~d alkylol~mid~s; and
alkylene oxlde ~n~An~te~ o4 f~t~y ac~d alkylol~mides.
Mlxturss of two or more nonionlc de~e,~c..t
ac~i~es ~an ~e employe~, as ~an mixtu~es of ~o~ tc and
anionlc detergent acti~es.
The ~ n~o~ atile constitu~n~s of a compo~ition of
25 this lnvention wlll be the de~er~3nt act~ vel and cat~ onic
polymer i~ thes~3 are u~ed, toyether with part of an~
perfu~e if used. An approximate wor~ing rule ~8 that-half
of a conventional perfume will clas~ as invola~lle. It is

2~1~642
very desl~ble t~at not ~ore than 0.5~ by weight o~ the
~ slti~n, p~efer~y not more tha~ 0.2~ ~ 8 provi~ed by
suCh involatlles.
The o~ ttlons of th~g inven~lon can ~e
S prepa~ed by simply mi~in~ their con~tituents into
dl~tilled or d~ ed water, e.g. in a m~ vesse~ wi~h
a ~tirrer.
EXAMP~ES
The ~n~ention is illustrated by the following
Example~ of ~ -L~ition~ (~n~luding some ~o~ra~lve
Examplss outsiae the invent~on). All percent~geg are by
we~ht. The nonionic detergent was ~9 to Cl1 synthetic
al~ohol ethox~l~ted w~th average 5 e~hylsne oxlde
lS res~dues. ~he aatlon~c pcl~mers uS~d were:
Poly~er Source ~pprox Approx Degree
Of
Mol. wt. Substit~tion
~% molar)
A~rylamide
Floc Aid 300 National Sta~ohlOm 2
Floc Aid 301 Nat~onal StarchlOm 7
Floo A~d 371 National S~arch~m 2.5
Cationised Guar
Jaguar C-13 Meyhall 2~+ 13
3S Polyd~methyl~iallylammon~um
~er~ua~ 100 Mer~k ~m 100

'~1 96~2
,~
Examp'~ ~ 1
~ by we~ht
Propylene gl~col monobutyl e~h~r 3.0
~on~onic det~rgent 0.1
~ationlc poly~e~ (Floa-Ald 301) 0.01
Monoethanolamine 1.0
10 Di~tilled watar bal~nce to 100
Ex~mple 2
~ by w~l~ht
15 n-Butanol 3.0
~on~oni~ detergent 0.1
~ationi~ polyme~ (Flo~-Aid 301) 0.01
20 Mo~o~th~nolamln~ 1.O
Dis~ A water b~lance to 100%
25 Example 3
~ ~Y ~el~ht
I~oy~u~anol 5-~
Nonionic dete~ent ~.15
Cationic pol~mer (Flo~-A~d 300) 0.01
30 Perf~me 0-03
Monoethanolamlne 1.O
~istille~ water ~alan~e to lO0

2~96~2
F,Y~p~e 4
% by we$~ht
Ethyl ~ellosolve 2.0
(ethylene glycol moneoeth~l ether)
S Nonionic dete~ent 0.1
Cation~C polyme~ (Floc-Aid 301) 0.01
~onoethanolam~ne 1.0
Di~tilled water balance to 100
Example A ~aom~ra~ive - dialkanolamlne~
lS ~ by wel~ht
Propylene ~lycol m~nohl~tyl ether 3.0
Nonlonl~ detergent 0.1
Cationic p~lymer (Floc-Aid 301) 0.02
Diethanola~ne 1.5
Dl~t~lled water ~alance to 100%
Example ~ (~omparative - non-valatil~ solvent~
~ ~y wei~t
Butyl digol
~4Hg-~-C2~-O-C~4-OH Bpt ~ 200~C) 5.0
30 ~onionic detergent 0.1
C~tionic polymer (Floc-Aid 301) 0.01
2-methyl 2-amino propanol 1.0

2~19~2
Example C (compa~atl~e - ino~ganic alkalln~ electrolyte)
~ ~y wel~ht
Propylene gly~ol monobutyl et~er 3.0
Nonionlc detergent 0.1
S Sodlum oarbonate 1.5
~atlonlc polymer (Floo-Ald 301) 0.0
Example S
~ ~y wei~ht
Propylen~ glycol monob~tyl et~r 2.5
~on~onlc detergent 0.2
Monoethanolamine 6.0
Cationlc pol~mer (Flo~-Aid 301~ 0.01
Example ~
% by we~ht
P~opylena glycol monobutyl ~ther 2.5
20 Nonlonio de~e~ent 0.2
2-methyl 2-amino propanol 6.0
Cationlc polymer (Floc-Aid 301) 0.01

201~642
Example D (comparative - high non~onic)
% ~y wei~ht
F~hyl csllosolve 2.0
(sthylene glyool monoethylether3
5 Nonioni~ detergen~ 0.8
Monoethanolamln~ 1.O
Cationio polymer (Floc-Aid 301) 0.01
Example E ~oomparative - alkali absent)
% by w~l~ht
Propylene g~ycol ~onobutyl ether 3.0
Nonioni~ detergent 0.1
Cationic polymsr (Floc - Ai~ 301) 0.01
15 Distillsd water bal~nce ~o 100
Ex~mpls 7 (ammonia a-Q fugitive alkall)
~ by welgh~ -
20 P~opylene glyool monobutyl ether 3.0
Nonionic deteraen~ 0.1
Ammonia O.S
Catlonio pol~mer (Flo¢-Ald 301) 0.01
Pistilled watsr balanoe to 100%

~A~3 1 9642
~m~!e 8 (~olvent absent)
% by weiqht
Monoethanolam~ne 1.0
N4n~0n~c deter~ent 0.1
Cat~on~c polymer (Floc-~id 301) 0.01
Dlstilled water bala~ce to 100
~ rle 9
% ~y wei~t
Methoxypropoxypropanol 3~0
Non~onic ~eterg~nt 0.1
Monoethanolamine 1.0
~ationic polyme$ (Floc-Ai~ 301) 0.01
15 D~stilled water b~lance to 100%
Example 10
% by weiaht
M~thoxypropanol ~propylene ~lycol ~ther) 3.0
Moneoth~nol~ine 1,0
Nonioni~ detergent 0.1
Cat~onlc polymer (Floc-Ai~ 301~ 0.01
~i~ti~led water balan~e to 100
Th~ compos~tions of the Examples were teRted for
ætreaking brought a~out by com~onents of the aomposit~o~
and for ~ffec~veness in oleaning.

17 20~ q64~
Streaking is assessed sub;ectively on high gloss
black-coloured ceramic tiles which have been wiped over
with a sponge cloth loaded with a standard amount of
formulation. The liquid film is allowed to evaporate
before assessment is made. High gloss black tiles are a
very discriminating surface for judgement of streaking and
product residues.
Effectiveness was assessed using ceramic floor
tiles soiled with either a predominantly fatty or a
predominantly particulate soil. Soiled tiles were
prepared by a combination of spraying of soil components
from a solvent solution/suspension, followed by rubbing of
soil into the surface to obtain an even coverage which
cannot be easily wiped off with a dry cloth.
To assess cleaning performance, 3 drops of
composition were applied to the soiled surface, allow~d ~o
soak for lO seconds, then wiped off with a dry paper
tissue.
The predominantly fatty soil consisted of 5
parts kaolin, 0.2 parts carbon black, 19 parts of glycerol
trioleate and 1 part oleic acid. This represents a model
for kitchen and bathroom soil. The predominantly
particulate soil consisted of 8 parts Illite clay, 0.1
parts carbon black and 2 parts glycerol trioleate; this is
a model for the soils found on floors and windows.
The results are expressed as a ranking of
performance, l representing the standard achieved by
Example 1, 1+ representlng an even better result, 1-

~01 9642
18
res~n~lng ~ htly inf~rior re~ult, an~ ~he ~alues ~,
3 and 4 repre,sentlng progr~si-Jely i~ferlor al~n~n5~.
Con~ ant:ly th~ ~c:ale is:
t 1
Wor~t
Resuit6:
Ex~mple No S~roakin~ F~ ;y Soi~ P~rt~ atR
~oil
Non~ 1 1
2 None 1~ 1
3 Non~ 1 3
4 tIone 1 2
A Ve~y ~ igh~ 1- 2
13 Stx~ky 3 3
~0 C SliçJht 2 2
Sl~ht 1~
None 1~ 1
D Very st~reaky
E Non~ 3 4
2 5 7 None 1 1-
Versr sli~ht 1 2
g Very slight
Non~ 1 1-

201964~
~ ho4~ ros~lt~ shDw that the ~LGdU~ 0~ ~n~ inv~ntlon
g~e goo4 oloanlng w~h very lo~ ~e~iAuo~ o~ p~o4uct on
tha cl~rrod s~r~ace.
~h~ oompo~ltion of ~xomple 1, and var~ou~
6 3n~logouC ~ q~ltlon~ with dlfferent a~t~on~a poly~or or
none at all, w~re used to d~onot~ote th~ valuc o~ the
oation~c polymer in re~v~l of Do~tioul~te
A 30cm x 300m ~la~a ml~ror ~o thoro~shly cl An~
~nd lt~ r~lPctance 1~ me~sured.
A ~oll oDn~i~tln~ of 8 ~ert~ of Ill$t~ type clay
~nd 0.1 part~ o~ carbon black in e~h~nol ~9 ~pr~d
l~ghtly n~ o~nly onto the m~rroL. ~efl60~anc~ le
m~aeuro~ a~aln. one half of the mirror (15om x 30cm~ i~
c~ean~d wlth ox~erlm~nt~l compo~tlon, the othor hal~ wlth
a control ~ln~Dw ctean~n~ pro~ct. B~oh hal~ aned
~y ~ n~ ~ ~1 of compo~it~on on the ~o~od 8urfa~e and
~ip~n4 32 tl~Q~ over ths ~r~ wlth a dry non tJ~ vl~cose
oloth tapp~o~.
75 ~.~.m.l 12 x l~cm. Ai'tsr ~llow~ 1 mlnute to dr~, th4
re~leo~anc~ o~ th~ cl ~n~ mir~or ~urf~ae 1~ maac~r~
~galn. Rno~lng the rel1ectance o~ the pe~featly clean
mlrror, tna ~ lo~ 4u~ to lnlti~l ond re~dual ~oil
ooverag~ aan ~e calc~lsted.

2019642
R~eult~ are a~ follows:
S lo~o ln refleotance
1 d ~o~l~a m~rror lO.S
F oo-A~ 301 1 Cl ear~d wlth control12 . ~
~ ~ J Clc-nod with E%ample 1 5.3
~ ~o~le~ m~rror 1~.2
No cat~oniC Cl~aned wlth cDntrol 11-7
pclymer C1C-~Q~ w~th ~v-~le 1
- without c~tlonlc 11.9
9011ed mirror 20.2
ClOanqd with oontrol 16.4
q Cl~n^d w~ th ~., n~ tlan havin~
i~ r~ ~ Jsguar C-~3 a~ oatlonia po~ymer 3.5
So$1ed mirrcr a3.7
Clean~d wlth ~ontrol 24.4
Cl~an~d w~ th oompo~ltion h~vCng
Fl~c-Ald 371 as catlon~c polymQr a . 9
90iled mirror 1~.7
clc~oe w~ ontrol 16.8
eone~ with ~ ltion havin~
~5 ~ M-rquat 100 aR eationiC polymer ~.7
All of th~ oatlonio polymer~ led to
4ubctantial i-..pro~q-~e~t oompared w~th uGe of the
compo4it~on h~v$ng no cation-a ~olym~r. ~ clm~ rssult
wa~ fo~n~ wltn a aoil also oante~n~n~ a p~to glyoe~ol
trloleate, whiah i~ the pre~om~nantly particulate aoil
~eferred to above.
~ ~R'~ R/~

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2019642 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2002-06-25
Letter Sent 2001-06-22
Grant by Issuance 1994-12-27
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1991-06-05
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1991-06-05
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1990-12-23

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - standard 1998-06-22 1998-05-11
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - standard 1999-06-22 1999-05-12
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2000-06-22 2000-05-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
UNILEVER PLC
Past Owners on Record
PETER LEONARD DAWSON
THOMAS STIRLING
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-12-26 20 565
Claims 1994-12-26 3 54
Abstract 1994-12-26 1 13
Abstract 1994-12-26 1 13
Cover Page 1994-12-26 1 16
Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-07-22 1 178
Fees 1997-05-13 1 74
Fees 1996-05-12 1 70
Fees 1995-05-10 1 59
Fees 1994-05-15 2 107
Fees 1992-05-14 1 45
Fees 1993-05-16 1 26
Correspondence 1994-09-01 1 20
Prosecution correspondence 1991-06-04 2 27
Prosecution correspondence 1994-10-18 1 49
Prosecution correspondence 1994-01-05 4 124
Courtesy - Office Letter 1991-07-08 1 20
Courtesy - Office Letter 1994-09-26 1 25
Courtesy - Office Letter 1990-09-13 1 36
Examiner Requisition 1993-10-04 2 61