Language selection

Search

Patent 2021871 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2021871
(54) English Title: RESONATOR
(54) French Title: SILENCIEUX AUXILIAIRE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract




In general, sound resonators or mufflers are bulky
self-contained metal bodies, which are expensive to produce
and to install in an engine intake or exhaust system. A
relatively simple substitute, which can be tailor made to
attenuate sound at various frequencies include two arcuate
casing sections which are interconnected along one side edge
by a hinge, so that the sections can be wrapped around an
engine air intake tube, a latch on the other side edges of the
sections for securing the sections together to form a sleeve
around and coaxial with the tube, an inlet nozzle on the
interior of each section for extending into the tube, and
partitions extending between the inner and outer surfaces of
each section for defining elongated, tortuous, sound
attenuating passages.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A sound resonator device for use on a cylindrical
sound transmitting tube connected to an engine comprising
elongated casing means, said casing means including two
elongated, hollow sections of arcuate cross section, each said
section being concavo-convex, and including parallel outer and
inner walls; hinge means interconnecting first side edges of
said sections whereby said sections can be wrapped around the
cylindrical sound transmitting tube; partition means in each
said section dividing the interior thereof into one elongated,
tortuous passage; an inlet nozzle extending outwardly from the
center of said inner wall of each said section for connecting
the interior of said tube to the passage in said casing means,
whereby sound is attenuated during movement along said
tortuous passage; and latch means on the free side edge of at
least one said section for engaging the free side edge of the
other said section for securing the sections together around a
tube.
2. A sound resonator device for use on a sound
transmitting tube connected to an engine comprising elongated
casing means, said casing means including two elongated,
hollow sections of arcuate cross section; hinge means
interconnecting one side edge of one section to one side edge
of the other section, whereby said sections can be wrapped



around the sound transmitting tube to define a hollow sleeve
with the hinge means extending longitudinally thereof;
partition means in each said section dividing the interior
thereof into at least one elongated, tortuous passage; and
inlet means in each said section for connecting the interior
of said tube to the passage in said section, whereby sound is
attenuated during movement along said tortuous passage.
3. A device according to claim 2, wherein each said
section is concavo-convex in cross section, and includes
parallel inner and outer walls, said inlet nozzle entering
outwardly from the inner wall of said section, whereby the
nozzle extends radially inwardly of the casing means through
the sound transmitting tube during use.
4. A device according to claim 3, wherein said inlet
nozzle is located in the centre of said concave inner wall,
said partition means defining passages in each longitudinal
direction of said casing means.
5. A device according to claim 3 including latch means
on the other side edge of at least one said section for
engaging the other side edge of the other said section for
securing the sections together around the sound transmitting
tube.
6. A device according to claim 2, wherein said body
means, partition means and inlet means are integral with each
other, and are formed of a plastic.



7. A device according to claim 6, wherein the plastic
is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene,
polypropylene, reinforced or rubber modified thermoplastic
polyolefin, a polyamide, acrylobutadiene styrene or polyphenyl
oxide.
8. A device according to claim 7, wherein said plastic
has a specific gravity of 1.6 to 1.8.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




~ ' ~ it'd ~.
This invention relates to a resanator, and in
particular to a resonator for use on an air inlet tube
attached to an internal combustion engine.
Air is introduced into an automotive engine for
creating an air/gasoline mixture which fuels the engine.
Typically, the air passes through an air filter, an inlet
tube, a throttle body or carburetor and an intake or inlet
manifold to the cylinders of the engine. Sound generated in
the cylinders, i.e. engine noise travels back through the
manifold and the inlet tube.
Many attempts have been made to reduce or attenuate .
engine noise. Typical devices for sound attenuation are
described in for example Canadian Patent No. 703,518, issued
top E. Ludlow et al on February 9, 1965, and United States
Patents Nos. 3,111,191, issued to J. Bachert on November 19,
1963; 3,388,769, issued to R.J. Martoia on June 18, 1968;
3,612,268, issued to O.E. Rieder on December 1, 1969;
3,966,015, issued to W.A. Bychinsky on June 29, 1976;
4,124,092, issued to S. Kajiya et al on November 7, 1978;
4,132,286, issued to H. Hasui et al on January 2, 1979;
4,164,266, issued to L. Collin et al on August 14, 1979;
4,165,798, issued to G. Martinez on August 28, 1979;
4,172,508, issued to L.C. Moss et al on October 30, 1979;
4,281,742, issued to A. Scheuermann et al on August 4, 1981;
4,415,059, issued to Y. Hayashi on November 15, 1983;
4,418,790, issued to R.E. Agnew on December 6, 1983;
1




;.~ 4~ ,~ !'~, Y"~ si,
.f ~~ ~ J .:. ti '~
4,538,701, issued to D.C. Lowery et al on September 3, 1985;
4,574,914, issued to R.T. Flugger on March 11, 1986;
4,623,035, issued to K. Schad et al on November 18, 1986;
4,848,513, issued to G. Csaszar on July 18, 1989; 4,874,062,
issued to K. Yanagida et al on October 17, 1989 and 4,890,691,
issued to C. Ching-ho on January 2, 1990.
It is well established that the geometry of a
resonator determines the sound attenuating efficiency of the
device. In this connection, reference is made to the
introductory portion of the Kajiya et al U.S. Patent No.
4,124,092 which succinctly sets out the physics of the
situation. It is readily apparent that the altering of
resonator dimensions affects noise attenuation. The mufflers
described in the above listed patents, and for that matter
mufflers in general are discrete devices which must be
installed in an inlet or exhaust system by interrupting the
system. Usually the muffler forms part of the system, and is
connected to tubes or pipes forming other parts of the system
by clamps or welding. Thus, the installation or removal of a
muffler is a somewhat difficult, time consuming and often
expensive job. Moreover, the structures used to achieve the
desired attenuation are often complicated and consequently
expensive to produce.
An object of the present invention is to solve the
above mentioned problems by providing a relatively simple,
2


CA 02021871 2000-02-25
easily installed, resonator, which can be inserted into
existing inlet or exhaust systems.
Another object of the invention is to provide a
resonator which can readily be mass produced by blow molding
at relatively little expense.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a
sound resonator device for use on a sound transmitting tube
connected to an engine comprising elongated casing means, said
casing means including two elongated, hollow sections of
arcuate cross section; hinge means interconnecting one side
edge of one section to one side edge of the other section,
whereby said sections can be wrapped around the sound
transmitting tube to define a hollow sleeve with the hinge
means extending longitudinally thereof; partition means in
each said section dividing the interior thereof into at least
one elongated, tortuous passage; and inlet means in each said
section for connecting the interior of said tube to the
passage in said section, whereby sound is attenuated running
movement along said tortuous passage.
The invention will be described in greater detail
with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate
a preferred embodiment of the invention, and wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic, isometric view of a
resonator in accordance with the present invention in the open
position;
3


CA 02021871 2000-02-25
Figure 2 is a schematic, isometric view of the
resonator of Fig. 1 in the closed position around a duct;
Figure 3 is a cross section taken generally along
line III-III of Fig. 2;
Figure 4 is a schematic, isometric view of an engine
and resonator in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 5 is a schematic graph of sound pressure
level versus engine noise frequency for a vehicle with and
without the resonator of Figs. 1 to 3; and
Figure 6 is a schematic graph of sound pressure
level versus engine speed for a vehicle with and without the
resonator of Figs. 1 to 3.
With reference to Figs. 1 to 3, a resonator in
accordance with the present invention which is generally
indicated at 1 includes an elongated casing defined by a pair
of arcuate, hollow sections 2 and 3. The sections 2 and 3 are
pivotally interconnected along one side edge by a hinge 4.
The hinge 4 is merely a web of material integral with the
sections 2 and 3.
Each section 2 and 3 is concavo-convex in cross
section, and includes an outer wall 6, an inner wall 7 and end
walls 8. The side edges of the walls 6 and 7 are pinched
together. When folded together (Figs. 2 and 3), the sections
2 and 3 define an oval cross section tube or casing. The free
side edges of the casing are interconnected by a latch defined
4


CA 02021871 2000-02-25
by a lug 10 on one section 2 and a detent 11 in the other
section 3. The walls 6 and 7 of each panel 2 and 3 are joined
by a pair of longitudinally extending straight partitions 12,
a T-shaped partition 13 and an L-shaped partition 14. The
partitions 12, 13 and 14 divide the interior of the sections 2
and 3 into
15
4a

c ay ~~ ~y) i
~~i~~ !j ~
elongated tortuous passages 16 (Fig. 3) of varying lengths.
An inlet nozzle 18 extends outwardly from the center of each
inner wall 8 of each panel 2 and 3. When the panels are
wrapped around a pipe or tube 19 (Figs. 2 and 3), the nozzles
18 project inwardly through an opening 20 in the pipe or tube.
The material used in the resonator is polyethylene,
polypropylene reinforced or rubber modified thermoplastic
polyolefin, an engineering material, e.g. a polyamide, ABS
(acrylobutadiene styrene or polyphenyl oxide). Rubber
modified thermoplastic polyolefin is preferred because of its
flexibility and ease of modification to obtain a high
specific gravity, e.g. 1.6 to 1.8. Higher mass is desired for
sound reduction. An example of a suitable rubber modified
thermoplastic polyolefin is Salflex 355EX-S (trademark)
available from Salflex Polymers Ltd., Concord, Ontario.
As shown in Figs. 2 and 4, in use the resonator 1 is
mounted on a pipe or tube - in this case a flexible air intake
tube 21, which carries air from its inlet end 22 through a
throttle 23 and an intake manifold 24 to an automobile engine
25. The geometry of the passages 16 can readily be changed to
attenuate noises at different frequencies. The graph of Fig.
5 is a simplistic representation of the results of tests using
the resonator 1 of Figs. 1 to 3. It will be noted that with
no resonator 1 on the intake tube the noise level (plot A) at
certain frequencies is substantially higher than the noise
level (plot B) when the resonator 1 is installed on the
5

CA 02021871 2000-02-25
intake or inlet tube 21. Figure 6 is a graph of expected
overall sound pressure level in decibels versus engine speed
for a vehicle without the resonator l (the solid upper line on
the graph) and for a vehicle using the resonator 1 (the broken
lower line). It has been found that a dramatic decrease in
the sound pressure level can be realized by using a resonator
1 of the type described herein.
It will be appreciated that the interior of the
sections 2 and 3 can be in fluid communication with each other
in the area of the hinge 4. Thus, in its simplest form, the
device of the present invention includes one inlet nozzle 18 w
and a single elongated tortuous passage 16. Moreover, the
geometry and the number of sections can be changed, provided
that the sections can be wrapped around a tube or pipe to
surround the latter.
6

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2001-05-08
(22) Filed 1990-07-24
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1992-01-25
Examination Requested 1997-07-18
(45) Issued 2001-05-08
Deemed Expired 2004-07-26

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1990-07-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1990-12-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1992-07-24 $100.00 1992-07-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1993-07-26 $100.00 1993-07-16
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1994-07-25 $100.00 1994-07-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1995-07-24 $150.00 1995-07-21
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1996-07-24 $150.00 1996-06-25
Request for Examination $400.00 1997-07-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1997-07-24 $150.00 1997-07-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1998-07-24 $150.00 1998-07-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 1999-07-26 $150.00 1999-07-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2000-07-24 $200.00 2000-07-20
Final Fee $300.00 2001-02-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2001-07-24 $200.00 2001-07-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2002-07-24 $200.00 2002-05-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ABC GROUP
Past Owners on Record
GEORGAS, DOUGLAS JEFFREY
SADR, CHANGIZE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1993-11-20 1 20
Cover Page 2001-04-25 1 36
Cover Page 1993-11-20 1 12
Claims 2000-02-25 3 87
Claims 1993-11-20 2 57
Abstract 2000-02-25 1 23
Description 2000-02-25 7 209
Drawings 1993-11-20 4 60
Description 1993-11-20 6 192
Representative Drawing 1999-04-19 1 9
Representative Drawing 2001-04-25 1 11
Fees 2000-08-08 1 33
Fees 2000-07-20 2 48
Fees 1999-07-23 1 24
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-07-29 2 85
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-11-24 2 4
Prosecution-Amendment 2000-02-25 12 363
Fees 1998-07-08 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 1997-07-18 1 41
Assignment 1990-07-24 5 147
Correspondence 2001-02-12 1 28
Fees 2001-07-23 1 29
Fees 2002-05-17 1 26
Fees 1997-07-18 1 34
Fees 1996-06-25 1 33
Fees 1995-07-21 1 28
Fees 1994-07-22 1 26
Fees 1993-07-16 1 17
Fees 1992-07-22 1 21