Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
9 ~
SION BINDER FOR CARPET AND CARPET TIr~S
~ Most conventional carpets comprise a primary backing with yarn tufts
! in the form of cut or uncut lo~ps extending upwardly fram the backing to
form a pile surface. In the case of tufted carpets, the yarn is inserted
into a primary backing by tufting needles and a pre-coat or binder applied
thereto. In the case of non-tufted on bonded pile carpets, the fibers are
.~ ~Y~ d and actually held in place by the binder camposition.
In both cases, the carpet oonstruction also usually includes a
secondary backing bonded to the primary backing. The secor~ry backing
provides extra padding to the carpet, absorbs noise, adds ~;me~ional
stability and often functions as a heat insulator. The secondaly backing
typically either a woven fabric such as jute or a foam sheet, is laminated
to the primary backing by a binder camposition or by an adhesive layer
applied to the tuft-lock coated primary backing.
S~milar techniques are used in the preparatian of cont;n~lollc (rolled)
as well as carpet tiles with the major difference being a higher degree of
rigidity, often achieved by changes in the structure or camposition of the
sec~n~ry backing.
- 2 ~ ~ ~'2 ~ ~ 1
Generally these applications require a lligh degree of water
resistance, a requirement which is usually met by the use of plastisol or
'' addition of hot melt adhesive to the primary and/or secondary backings.
However environmental and safety concerns, particularly in the industrial
S and institutional areas where carpet tiles containing high levels of
,
plastisol predominate, have led to the devel~ n~ of stringent fl~ and
smoke retardant standards. Moreover, the use of plastisol places a further
requirement on the binder utilized in the primary coating that the binder
' comprise a composition onto which the plastisol will have good adhesion.
Thus, the physical properties of the binder are highly important to
succe~ful utilization as a carpet backing coating for the present
~A~
~ invention. In this regard, there are a number of important requirements
.~
-- which must be met by such a coating. It must be capable of being applied
; to the carpet and dried using the processes and equipment conventionally
,
employed in the carpet industry for latex coating. It must provide
~ ell~nt adhesion to the pile fibers to secure them firmly to the backing
~J
both in tufted and non-tufted constructions. The coating must also have
- low smoke density values and high flame retardant properties and must
~- accept a high loading with fillers such as calcium cdLbulate, clay,
_a
x 20 aluminum trihydrate, barite, feldspar, etc. Furthermore, the coating must
~,-, maintain sufficient softness and flexibility, even with high filler loading
;~ or at low temFerature, to enable the carpet, if prepared in continuous
.
form, to be easily rolled and unrolled during installation and, in the case
q of carpet tiles that the tile have sufficient rigidity so as to be easily
.~
set in place. The softness and flexibility properties will then vary
~Ppen~;ng on the style of carpet but in all cases, it is important that the
- carpet will lie flat and not exhibit a tendencey to curl or dome.
- 3 - ~ ~
The latex binders utilized heretofore have been lacking in at least
one of these critical areas. Thus, highly filled styrene butadiene systems
suffer with respect to their poor adhesion to plastisol and exhibit a high
degree of smoke generation; ethylene-vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate binders
do not pass the ~ st stringent smoke generation tests while low Tg ethylene
vinyl acetate systems do not have adequate strength or tuft binding
properties.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an
econcmical latex binder for carpets and carpet tiles characterized by a
superior balance of adhesion to plastisol, low smoke generation, high flame
retardance and dry and wet tuft bind st-eng~. Further, the latex binder
must be able to ac oe pt and permanently adhere to a secondary backing such
as PVC plastisol, hot melt adhesive, woven fabric, as a foam or solid film
or another backing composition.
We have now found that emulsion polymers prepared frcm ethylene, a
vinyl ester and a copolymerizable l - - having a Tg greater than or
equal to 50~C, provide superior binders for use in carpet backings,
partic11~r1y for use in carpet backed with polyvinyl chloride plastisol.
The present invention is therefore directed to emulsion binders
comprising:
a) 40 to 80% by weight of a vinyl ester of an alkanoic acid, the acid
having frcm l to 13 carbon atoms;
b) 5 to 25% by weight of a copolymerizable ~ r having a Tg of at
least 50~C and
c) lO to 30% ethylene.
_ 4 - ~ 32iv~i~
The resultant emulsion binders are then formulated into primary carpet
coatings ccmprising 20 to 70 percent by weight of the latex binder and 80
:
~ to 30 peroe nt by weight filler.
'~ The ooatings of the present invention are advantageously ut;l;~ed in
the production of either conventional tufted or non tufted carpet and dried
~ using e~ m~nt which is readily available in most carpet mills. Thus, the
'r~ coatings are useful in the production of pile carpets c ~ prising a primary
backing with pile yarns extending fro~ the primary backing to form pile
tufts; as well as non-tufted carpets wherein the fibers are ~ d into
!;
~ 10 binder composition which has been co~ted onto a woven or non-woven
,;~
~ substrate. In addition to having excellent fiber bonding characteristics,
~- excellent dry and wet tuft bind properties, and excellent resistance to
-- delamination of the secondary backing, the specific polymer latex also has
the desireable good flame retardancy and low smoke properties. In
.
addition, the tuft-lock adhesive coating can be loaded to a high degree
with a filler, such as calcium carbonate, clay and aluminum trihydrate,
which enhances the flame retardancy and low smoke properties of the carpet
without adversely affecting the adhesive properties of the co~tin9. For
example, the coating may oomprise from about 20 to 70 percent by weight of
the polymer latex composition and from about 80 to 30 percent by weight
aluminum trihydrate filler.
The present invention also provides a method of preparing a pile or
-~ tufted carpet which includes the steps of:
a) tufting or nP~l;nq the yarn into a woven or n~ ven backing;
~; 25 b) applying a primary carpet coating to the rear of the backing; and
c) drying the resultant carpet construction.
. . .
:
In producing such tufted carpets it is also desirable to apply a
secondary backing to the primary backing either before or after drying of
the latex coating, deperding upon the type of backing employed.
Non-tufted carpets may also be prepared utilizing the latex coating of
the invention by a method which comprises the steps of;
a) coating the latex onto a substrate;
b) embedding the carpet fibers therein; and
c) drying.
These non-tufted carpets may also be advantageously prepared utilizing
a secondary backing to provide additional dimensional stability.
The vinyl esters utilized herein are the esters of alkanoic acids, the
acid having frcm one to about 13 carbon atcms. Typical examples include;
vinyl formate, vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate, vinyl butyrate, vinyl
isobutyrate, vinyl valerate, vinyl-2-ethyl-hexanoate, vinyl isooctanoate,
vinyl nonate, vinyl decanoate, vinyl pivalate, vinyl versatate, etc. Of
the foregoing, vinyl acetate is the preferred monomer because of its ready
availability and low cost. The vinyl ester is present in the copolymer in
amounts of about 40 to 80 % by weight, preferably 60 to 70%.
Any copolymerizable o~-~n~..~r having a Tg of 50~C or greater may be
emploved herein. Representative high Tg c~~ ~..ers include methyl
methacrylate, styrene, dimethyl maleate, t-butyl methacrylate, vinyl
pivalate, t-butyl isobornyl acrylate, phenyl mcthacrylate, acrylonitrile.
These are generally used at levels of 5 to 25% by weight, preferably 10 to
20%.
The ethylene c~.. ~nent is generally added at levels of 10 to 30% by
weight, preferably 15 to 25~.
. ~
It may also be desired to incorporate in the copolymer minor amounts
of one or more functional comonomers. Suitable copolymerizable ~ rs
include, for example, acrylic and methacrylic acid or the half esters of
maleic acid such as monoethyl, monobutyl or monooctyl maleate, acrylamide,
S tertiary octylacrylamide, N-methylol (meth)acrylamide, N-
vinylpyrrolidinone, diallyl adipate, triallyl cyanurate, butanediol
diacrylate, allyl methacrylate, etc. as well as C2-C3 hydroxyalkyl esters
such as hydroxyethyl acrylate, hydroxy propyl acrylate and c~L.e~onding
methacrylates. The latter ~ ~rs are generally used at levels of less
than about 5~, preferably 0.5 to 2.5%, depending upon the nature of the
specific comonomer.
In addition, certain copolymerizable monomers which assist in the
stability of the copolymer emuls1on, e.g., vinyl sulfonic acid, are also
useful herein as latex stabilizers. These optionally present ~ nomers, if
employed, are added in very low amounts of from 0.1 to about 2% by weight
of the monomer mixture.
The latex binder emulsions are prepared using conventional procedures
wherein the vinyl acetate, ethylene, and other ~ n~..ers are polymerized
in an aqueous medium under pressures not PYceed;ng 100 at~o-spheres in the
presence of a catalyst and at least one emulsifying agent, the ~q~leo~
system being maintained by a suitable buffering agent at a pH of 2 to 6,
the catalyst being added in~r~.cn~ally or continuously. More specifically,
the vinyl acetate and 50 to 75% of the other comonomers are sl~p~n~Pd in
water and are thoroughly agitated in the presence of ethylene under the
working pressure to effect solution of the ethylene in the mixture up to
the subst~nti~1 limit of its solubility under the condition existing in the
reaction zone, while the vinyl acetate and high Tg monomer are gradually
heated to pol~erization temperature. The homogenization period is
foilowed by a poly~erization period during which the catalyst, which
consists of a main catalyst or initiator, and may include an activator, is
added incrementally or continuously together with the remaining cnm~n~m~rs
and functional monomers. The monomers employed may be added either as pure
moncmer or as a premixed emulsion.
Suitable as polymerization catalysts are the water-soluble free-
radical-formers generally used in emulsion polymerization, such as hydrogen
peroxide, scdium persulfate, potassium persulfate and ammonium persulfate,
as well as tert-butyl hydroperoxide, in amounts of between 0.01 and 3% by
weight, preferably 0.01 and 1~ by weight based on the total amount of the
emulsion. They can be used alone or together with reducing agents such as sodium
formaldehyde-sulfoxylate, ferrous salts, sodium dithionite, sodium hydrogen
~ sulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium thios1l1fate, as redox catalysts in amounts
of 0.01 to 3% by weight, preferably 0.01 to 1% by weight, based on the
total amount of the emulsion. The frce radical-formers can ~e charged in
the aqueous emulsifier solution or be added during the polymeri~ation in
doses.
The polymerization is carried out at a pH of between 2 and 7,
preferably between 3 and 5. In order to maintain the pH range, it may be
useful to work in the presence of custcmary buf~er systems, for example, in
the presen oe of alkali metal acetates, alkali metal carbonates, alkali
metal phosphates. Polymerization regulators, like mercaptans, aldehydes,
chloroform, ethylene chloride and trichlorc~ethylene, can also be added in
scme cases.
- 8 - ~ r
h ~
The emulsifying agents are those generally used in emulsion
polymerization, as well as optionally present protective colloids. It is
also p~s;hle to use emulsifiers alone or in mixtures with protective
i colloids.
; 5 The emulsifiers can be anionic, cationic, nonionic surface-active
compounds or mixtures thereof. Suitable anionic emulsifiers are, for
example, alkyl sulfonates, alkylaryl sulfonates, alkyl sulfates, sulfates
of hydroxylalkanols, alkyl and alkylaryl disulfonates, sllf~n~ted fatty
~ acids, sulfates and phosphates of polyethyoxylated alkanols and
- '0 alkylphenols, as well as esters of sulfosuccinic acid. Suitable cationic
3 emulsifiers are, for example, alkyl quaternary a~monium salts, and alkyl
quaternary ph~sph~nium salts. Examples of suitable non-ionic emulsifiers
are the addition products of 5 to 50 mols of ethylene oxide adducted to
straight-chain and bL~J~h chain alkanols with 6 to 22 carbon atcms, or
15 alkylphenols, or higher fatty acidst or higher fatty acid amides, or
primary and secondary higher alkyl amines; as well as block copolymers of
propylene oxide with ethylene oxide and mixtures thereof. When
combin~ n~ of emulsifying agents are used, it is advantageous to use a
relatively hydroph~bic emulsifying agent in ccmbination with a relatively
20 hydrophilic agent. The amount of emulsifying agent is generally from about
1 to about 10, preferably from about 2 to about 8, weight percent of the
eL~ used in the polymerization.
The emulsifier used in the polymerization can also be added, in its
entirety, to the initial charge to the polymerization zone or a portion of
25 the emulsifier, e.g. from 90 to 25 percent thereof, can be added
- continuously or intermittently during polymerization.
. ~
h ~ U ~ '
_ 9 _
Various protective colloids may also be used in place of or in
addition to the emulsifiers described above. Suitable colloids include
partially acetylated polyvinyl alcohol, e.g., up to 50 percent acetylated,
casein, hydroxyethyl starch, carboxymethyl cellulose, gum arabic, and the
like, as known in the art of synthetic emulsion polymer technology. In
general, these colloids are used at levels of 0.05 to 4% by weight based on
the total emulsion.
The process of making the emulsions generally oomprises the
preparation of an aqueous solution containing at least sone of the
llsifying agent and stabilizer, and the pH buffering system. This
aqueous solution and the initial charge of vinyl ester are added to the
polymerization vessel and ethylene pressure is applied to the desired
value. The quantity of ethylene entering into the copolymer is influenced
by the pressure, the a~itation, and the viscosity of the polymerization
medium. Thus, to increase the ethylene content of the copolymer, higher
pressures are employed. A pressure of at least about lO al ~ eres is
most suitably employed. As previously mentioned, the mixture is thoroughly
agitated to dissolve the ethylene, agitation being continued until
substantial equilbrium is achieved. This generally requires about 15
minutes. However, less time may be required depending upon the vessel, the
efficiency of agitation, the specific system, and the like. When high
ethylene contents are desired, a higher degree of agitation should be
employed. In any case, by measuring the pressure drop of the ethylene in
co-v~n~ional manner, the re~ tion of substantial e~-;l;hrium can be
easily det~rm;nqd. Conveniently the charge is brought to polymerization
temperature during this agitation period. Agitation can be effected by
shaking, by means of an agitator, or other known mechanism. The
-- 10 --
polymerization is then initiated by introducing initial amounts of the
catalyst, and of the activator when used. After polymerization has
started, the catalyst and the activator are incrementally added as required
to continue polymerization, and the remainder of the major monomer and any
5 minor functional monomers are ~imil~rly added.
Alternatively, the polymers utilized herein may be prepared using a
two-stage polymerization procedures generally referred to as prcducing
"core-shell" or "interpenetrating network" type polymers. Such
polymerization procedures are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos.
10 3,671,610; 3,833,404; and 4,616,057.
In such cases, an ethylene vinyl acetate
polymer is prepared as a first stage using conventional batch, semi-batch
or continuous emulsion polymerization procedures such as taught in U.S.
Pat. Nos. 2,754,280; 2,795,564 and 3,732,184. The amounts of ethylene and
15 vinyl acetate may vary within a range of a~out 10 to 25% by weight ethylene
and 70 to 9096 vinyl acetate with the amounts chosen so as to provide a
first-stage polymer havir~ a Tg of -20 to +10~C.
The ~nomers which canprise the major portion of the second stage
copolymer are then selected to have a Tg within the range of 50 to 125~C.
20 and a second stage polymerization is then carried out, ~gain using
conventional techniques so as to produce a polymer wherein the ratio of the
first stage polymer to the second stage polymer may vary from about 6:1 to
2:1 and is preferably in the range of 3:1.
R~ less of the polymerization procedure used, the reaction is
25 generally continued until the residual vinyl ester moncmer content is below
about 1%. The c~npleted reaction product is then allowed to cool to about
roan ~ e.dture, while sealed fra~ the at~s~h~re.
~ ~1.4 ~3 ~
The emulsions are produced and used at relatively high solids content,
. e.g., between 35 and 70%, preferably not less than 50%, although they may
. be diluted with water if desired.
The particle size of the latex can be regulated by the quantity of
5 nonionic or anionic emulsifying agent or protective colloid employed. To
~,.,
obtain smaller particle sizes, greater amounts of emulsifying agents are
used. As a general rule, the greater the amount of the emulsifying agent
employed, the smaller the average particle size.
, .
-~ If desired, conventional additives may be incorporated into the carpet
;5 10 binders of our invention in order to modify the properties thereof. Among
. .,
these additives may be included fillers, thickeners, catalysts,
~ dispersants, colorants, biocides, anti-foaming agents, etc.
In particular, the ability to load the coating with high amounts of
~ fillers such as clay, calcium carbonate, aluminum trihydrate, barium,
,~ 15 feldspar, etc. permits an increase in the superior flame retardancy and low
P smoke properties the copolymer already has. Preferred coating compositions
in accordance with the present invention are loaded with filler to yield a
camposition ranging fram about 20 to 70 percent by weight polymer, and
aboùt 80 to 30 percent by weight filler depending, in part, on the type and
20 form of the carpet being constructed.
., ~
' In preparing a tufted carpet, the yarn is tufted or needled into a
primary backing which is generally non-woven polypropylene, polyethylene or
polyester or woven jute or polypropylene. If a seco~Ary backing is used,
it is generally formed of woven or non-woven materials similar to those
~- 25 used as the primary backing and applied directly to the wet pre-coated
y backing prior to the drying step or applied with a separater
adhesive to the dried pre-coated primary backing. Such a secondary backing
:'
12 ~ ~ ;~ ~ A ~
provides dimensional stability to the carpet. The secondary backing may
also be formed of a foam polymer or copolymer. Suitable foam compositions
include urethane polymers, polymers and copolymers of ethylene, propylene,
isobutylene, and vinyl chloride. When a foam secondary backing is used, it
may be prefoamed and then laminated onto the primary backing, or the
composition may contain a thermally activatable blowing agent and may be
foamed ; -~i~tely prior to lamination or after lamination. Additionally,
the secondary backing may exhibit thermoplastic adhesive properties of its
own, and the secondary backing can be preheated prior to lamination to
render the surface thereof adhesive. Alternatively, the secondary backing
may comprise a hot melt, one or more or fused polyvinyl chloride plastisol
layer(s) or bitumen, often in conjunction with fiberglass scrim or other
scrim known to provide dimensional stability. It is also contemplated that
the latex binder composition disclosed herein for use as the primary
lS backing may be used as the secondary backing.
In forming a non-tufted carpet, the carpet coating is generally
thickened to a viscosity of about 25,000 to 7S,000 cps. and applied to a
scrim surface. The fibers are then directly ~mhe~d into the wet coating
using conventional te~hniq~les and then dried. Again, a secondary coating
similar to that described above is desirably employed.
The coating is easier to apply to the carpet than hot melt
thermoplastic adhesives which require expensive and complex ~chin~s and
processes to apply the coating, and the coating also peneL~es the fibers
of the carpet yarns to yield better adhesion, fiber bundle integrity and
2S anti-fuzzing properties. Addition~lly, the coating exhibits part;c~l~rly
excellent tuft-bind properties. The term "tuft-bind" refers to the ability
of a the latex coating to lock and secure the pile yarn tufts to the
- 13 - ~a~
primary backing and is determined by measuring the amount of force required
to physically pull a tuft free from the primary backing. Additionally for
the purposes herein, tuft-bind is also used to include the superior
characteristics needed in non-tufted coatings wherein the ~hesion of the
fiber pile is achieved solely by the backing. Suitable tuft-bind
properties can be achieved by applying an amount of coating ranging from
about 12 ounces per square yard to about 32 ounces per square yard (dry
basis), which results in a carpet having a tuft-bind value of at least 10
pounds foroe , and in many instances a tuft-bind value of 15 pounds force or
greater.
Examples
A latex emulsion useful in the production of the carpet coatings of
the invention was prepared by as follows:
A 10 liter stainless steel autoclave equipped with heating/cooling
means, variable rate stirrer and means of metering ~ rs and initiators
was employed. To the 10 liter autoclave was char~ed 200g (of a 20% w/w
solution in water) sodium alkyl aryl polyethylene oxide ~llph~te (3 moles
ethylene oxide), 25g (of a 70% w/w solution in water) alkyl aryl
polyethylene oxide (30 mole ethylene oxide), 30g (of a 25% w/w solution in
water~ sodium vinyl slllrh~te~ 2g sodium fomaldehyde slll~hoxylate, 0.5
sodium acetate, 5g (of a 1% solution in water) ferrous sulphate solution in
990g water. After purging with nitrogen, 2000g vinyl acetate and 3.0g
triallyl cyanurate were added and the reactor was pressurized to 600 psi
with ethylene and e~;l;hrated at 50~C for 15 minutes.
r r~ ~? r~ ~ . q
- 14 - h ~
The polymerization was started by simultaneously metering in solutions
of 37.5g (of a 70% w/w solution in water) tertiary butyl hydroperoxide in
1759 of water and 309 sodium formaldehyde snlrhoxylate and 0.5g sodium
acetate in 1759 of water. The initiators were added at a uniform rate over
a period of 5 hours.
After initiation (2~C increase in contents temperature), a mixture of
5509 vinyl acetate, 450g methyl methacrylate, 90g N-methylol acrylamide
(48% w/w solution in water) in a solution of lOOg (of a 20% w/w solution in
water) sodium alkyl aryl polyethylene oxide sulphate (3 mole ethylene
- 10 oxide), and 259 (of a 70% w/w solution in water) alkyl aryl polyethylene
oxide (30 mole ethylene oxide) in 200g water was added at a uniform rate
over a period of 4 hours. At this point, the contents temperature was
increased to 82~C and maintained until the polymerization was complete. At
i the end of the initiator slow additions, the reaction contents were
transferred to a holding tank and de~Assed of residual ethylene. To the
holding tank was charged 29 (of a 70% w/w solution in water) tertiary butyl
hydlo~eLu~ide in 20g water. After 15 minutes, 2g of sodium formaldehyde
~'Ll sulfoxylate in 20g water was also added. After this procedure the internal
temperature was cooled to 25~-30~C and discharged.
The resultant emulsion polymer, designated Emulsion 2, cDntAinF~ 72.25
parts vinyl acetate, 15 parts ethylene, 12.5 parts methyl methacrylate, 1.5
parts N-methyhol acrylamide and 0.1 parts triallyl cyanaurate.
Using a si~ilAr procedure, other latex emulsions were prepared varying
the ~ nomers and relative ; lnt.5. The resultant emulsions ~b5;9n~ed
25 Emulsions 1-7,11,13,14 and 16, all of which have Tg values above 0~C, are
~ described in Table I.
.4
Emulsion 8, was prepared using the followin3 two stage polymerization
procedure:
The base (first-step) ethylene vinyl acetate latex was prepared as in
the procedure above but substituting t~.e methyl methacrylate with vinyl
acetate.
In the second state, a 10 liter stainless steel autoclave reaction
vessel equipped with heating/cooling means variable rate stirrer ar.d means
of metering monc~ers and initiators was employed. To the 10 liter reactor
containing 5132g (of a 62.4% w/w solids in water) alkyl aryl polyethylene
oxide (30 moles ethylene oxide) in 950g water. After purging with
nitrogen, the contents temperature was raised to 60~C. The second-stage
polymerization was initiated by separately and simultaneously adding a
mixture of 640.5g methyl methcarylate, 19.2g isobutcxy methacrylamide and
3.2g triallyl cyanurate ~cc~mr~nied by 7.7g (of a 70% solution in water)
tertiary butyl hydroperoxide in 128g water and 5.1g sodium formaldehyde
sulfoxylate and 1.3g sodium acetate in 128g water. The moncmer mixture and
the initiator solutions were added at a uniform rate over a pericd of 1 1/2
and 2 hours resFectively. The contents t~er7ture was maintained at 60~C
until the polymerization was complete. At the end of the initiator slow
additions the reactor contents was cooled to 25~-30~C ar~ ~isch~rged.
A similar procedure was used to prepare Emulsion 9 and 15. All these
Fm~ ions had Tg values above 0~C.
Testing
In order to evaluate the properties of the emulsions in carpet
coatings, Emulsions 1-16 were form~ tpd at 70 to 72~ solids levels, coated
on carpet and tested as follows:
- 16 -
Formulation (by dry parts)
Ingredients Pts by Wt.
Polymer 100.00
Polyacrylate dispersant
(optional, as needed) 0.25
Ammonium chloride 1.00
Alumina Trihydrate Filler 154.00
Xmmonium Hydroxide (26%) as needed for pH =
7.0-8.0
Cellulosic Thickener 0.5 - 1.5*
*as needed for viscosity = 2000 - 3000 cps (#4/20 rpm) Brookfield RVT
Coating Procedure
The ccmpounds were scrape coated onto the back of a 28 oz/yd2
commercially supplied cut pile carpet. The coated carpet samples were dried
for 5 minutes at 260~F and cured for 5 minutes at 300~F. Samples were then
coated with a typical polyvinyl chloride plastisol sr~olln~ and cured for 7
minutes at 300~F. Samples were placed in a constant climate room overnight
prior to testing.
Tuft Bind Value
This test measures the durability and wear resistance properties of
the carpet by determining the amount of force (in lbs) required to pull a
loop or one leg of a loop through the backing. Since all of our testing
was don2 on cut pile carpet, a Kelly clamp was used to hold a single tuft.
The Kelly clamp was then secured in the top jaw of the Instron and the
carpet in the bottom jaw. Testing was done at a speed of 12 inches~nin.
using a 100 lb. cell. Dry tuft bind values were conducted after
conditioning the samples for at least 12 hrs at 72~F and 65% relative
humidity. Wet tuft bind values were conducted on ,~les which had been
ccmpletely immersed in water at rc~m temperature for 2 hrs.
h 3 ? ~
Adhesion Properties
Testing was done to detenmine the adhesive strength between the
precoat and PVCL plastisol. Testing was done by applying about 100 mils of
liquid PVCL plastisol to the precoat carpet and heated for 7 minutes at
300~F in order to obtain a fused PVCL plastisol. Coated samples were
. tested for adhesion after 24 hrs. @ 160~F and 1 week @ 160~F. The one week
; reading gives an indication of the effect of plasticizer migration on
' adhesion properties.
The results of the testing are shown in Table I.
-
i:
.1
-
,:
~ . .
s .
~.1
.,,
.~
.' '
. :,
, .
2v2~a'~ ;
o ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~
.~
u)
c~ o ~ _I ~ ~ ~ o cn CD ~ cr. ~ o ~ ~~ ~-
D o o ~ ~ o l~ ~ u~ o a~
~ ~ 5
C~ m H
~0 ~ ~ ~
a) O j~ o o ~i
~: ~ o ~ - - - - o
Z Z Z ~
h _~ ~ ai ~ ~ v
a~ ~ ut ~ o O o ~ ~ ~ ~ a~
co ~ n ~n ~ t
~ ~ ~
U ~ ~ G ~ V ~ e ~
r-l ~ ~ r-l ~ r--l r1 ~ ~ r~ U
cr ~ ~D ~Sr ~ r ~ g ~ $ In 5)
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll
~r~ Z~
ru~ ~ ~
3 r~l ~ 1~ Cr 1~ CO C5~ 0 r~l ~ ~ dr In r~
- 19 - ~ n ;~
As is readily apparent, carpet prcduced utilizing the latex emulsion
of the invention results in a product having superior performance
properties as demonstrated by the high tuft bind and excellent adhesion
values.
In partic~ r, it is noted that the addition to the emulsion polymer
of the high Tg c~l~r substantially improves the tuft bind properties,
especially the dried tuft bind properties, of the backed carpets. It is
further noted that although the values achieved utilizing Emulsion 13,
which contained no N-methylol acrylamide, were not as high as those of the
NMA-cont~ining control, the dry values (9.7) were approximately equivalent
to those of the control (10.6) and the overall performance was acceptable
for ~se in those applications where formaldehyde free systems, such as
those c~t~inin9 NMA, cannot be utilized. Additionally, the resultant
carpets exhibited excellent flame retardancy properties and low smoke
density values.
