Language selection

Search

Patent 2028415 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2028415
(54) English Title: CHEMICALLY BONDED SUPERABRASIVES GRIT
(54) French Title: PARTICULES SUPER-ABRASIVES LIEES PAR PROCEDE CHIMIQUE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(52) Canadian Patent Classification (CPC):
  • 57/15
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C09K 3/14 (2006.01)
  • B23P 5/00 (2006.01)
  • B23P 15/28 (2006.01)
  • B24D 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C09C 1/68 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CHEN, SY-HWA (United States of America)
  • SUNG, CHIEN-MIN (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • NORTON COMPANY (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1999-01-12
(22) Filed Date: 1990-10-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-05-23
Examination requested: 1994-04-29
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
441,341 United States of America 1989-11-22

Abstracts

English Abstract



Superabrasive grits such as diamond or CBN is
chemically bonded with a coating such as tungsten which is
in turn bonded to a tool body providing superabrasive
cutting tools such as saw blades, grinding wheels, drill
bits and the like.


French Abstract

La présente invention a pour objet des particules superabrasives tels des grains de diamants ou CBN, qui sont chimiquement liées à l'aide d'un agent enrobant tel du tungstène, qui est à son tour lié à des substrats d'outils superabrasifs tels des lames de scie, des meules, des forets et d'autres outils du même genre.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive
property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. A coated superabrasive grit, comprising
superabrasive grit particles having roughened surfaces, said
superabrasive grit being selected from the group consisting
of diamond and CBN, a substantially continuous first
metallic coating on top of said roughened surfaces and
being chemically bonded thereto, said first metallic
coating being selected from the group consisting of W,
Mo, Ta, Nb, and alloys thereof, and a second substantially
continuous metallic coating on top of said first
metallic coating, said second metallic coating comprising
nickel or copper, said first and second metallic coatings
having a total thickness in the range of about 1 to 50
microns.
2. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 1
wherein said first metallic coating is tungsten.
3. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 1
wherein said second metallic coating comprises nickel.
4. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 1
wherein said second metallic coating comprises NiB.
5. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 1
wherein said first metallic coating is tungsten and said
second metallic coating comprises NiB.
6. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 5
wherein said first metallic coating is about 10 microns
thick and said second metallic coating is about 30
microns thick.
7. A tool which comprises a coated superabrasive
grit according to claim 1 which is in contact with a
matrix and said matrix being bonded to a tool body.
8. A tool according to claim 7 in which the tool
body is metallic.
9. A tool according to claim 7 in which the tool
body is non-metallic.
10. A tool according to claim 8 which is a saw blade.



11. A tool according to claim 8 which is a drill bit.
12. A tool according to claim 7 in which the grit has
a packing efficiency of more than 70% by volume.
13. A cutting tool which comprises as cutting members
a coated superabrasive grit according to claim 1 and said grit
being an integral part of a tool.
14. A coated superabrasive grit, which can support a
tensile strength of 2.3 kg/cm2 (15 KSI) comprising
superabrasive grit particles, selected form the group
consisting of diamond and CBN, said grit particles being
surface cleaned and covered with a substantially continuous
metal coating selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Ta,
Nb and alloys thereof, said coating having a thickness of at
least 7.75 µm and being chemically bonded to the grit
particles.
15. The coated superabrasive grit of claim 14 further
comprising superabrasive grit particles having roughened
surfaces.
16. A coated superabrasive grit, which can support a
tensile strength of 2.3 kg/cm2 (15 KSI) comprising
superabrasive grit particles, selected form the group
consisting of diamond and CBN, said grit particles being
surface cleaned and covered with a substantially continuous
metal coating selected from the group consisting of W, Mo, Ta,
Nb and alloys thereof, said coating having a thickness of at
least 7.75 µm and being chemically bonded to the grit
particles and further comprising a second substantially
continuous metallic coating on top of said first metallic
coating, said second metallic coating comprising nickel or
copper, said first and second metallic coatings having a total
thickness in the range of about 1 to 50 µm.
17. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 16,
wherein said first metallic coating is tungsten.
18. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in claim 16,
wherein said second metallic coating comprises nickel.
19. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in any one
of claims 16 to 18, wherein said metallic coating comprises


NiB.
20. A coated superabrasive grit as defined in any one
of claims 16 to 18 wherein said first metallic coating is
tungsten and said second metallic coating comprises NiB.
21. A coated abrasive grit as defined in any one of
claims 16 to 18, wherein said first metallic coating is about
10 µm thick and said second metallic coating is about 30 µm
thick.
22. A process for making a coated superabrasive grit
comprising superabrasive grit particles selected from the
group consisting of diamond and CBN comprising the steps of:
surface cleaning the grit which step includes
rinsing the grit in deionized water and
coating the cleaned grit with a metal which is not
readily oxidizable, selected from W, Ta, Mo, Nb or alloys
thereof in a thickness of 1 µm to 50 µm and thermally treating
the coated grit to form a strong chemical bond between the
coating and the grit.
23. A tool which comprises a coated superabrasive grit
according to any one of claims 14 to 18 which is in contact
with a matrix and said matrix being bonded to a tool body.
24. A tool according to claim 23, in which the tool body
is metallic.
25. A tool according to claim 23, in which the tool body
is non-metallic.
26. A tool according to claim 23 in which the tool body
is a saw blade.
27. A tool according to claim 23 in which the tool body
is a drill bit.
28. A tool according to any one of claims 24 to 27 in
which the grit has a packing efficiency of more than 70% by
volume.
29. A cutting tool which comprises as cutting members,
a coated superabrasive grit according to one of claims 14 to
18, and said grit being an integral part of a tool.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


20234~
Docket NCM-2223

CHEMICALLY B~NDED SUPERABRASIVES GRIT

Sy-Hwa Chen
7679 Brighton Way
Salt Lake City, Utah 84121

Chien-Min Sung
12049 Aspen Ridge Road
Salt Lake City, Utah 84070
-
~ACRGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a novel coated
superabrasive grit which is useful for producing improved
abrasive or cutting tools. The present invention also
~; 5 includes within its scope the tools thus produced embodying
the coated grit.
~ Superabrasives grit such as diamond and C~N,
attached to a supporting body, is widely used for removing
materials. Typical applications include, for example,
10 sawing, drilling, dressing, grinding, lapping and
polishing.
In typical applications, the grit is held in a
suitable matrix and attached to a tool body. The retention
of the grit is primarily accomplished by mechanical means,
15 such as by surrounding the grit with the matrix material.
This method of attachment, although simple and practical,
has limitations because the exposure of the grit must be
limited so as not to weaken the mechanical grip of the
surrounding matrix. As a result, the cutting rate is
20 limited by the small grit exposure. Further, as the matrix
is worn down, the retention becomes insufficient so the grit
can be "pulled out" and lost. For example, in a typical saw
blade application, the average exposure of the diamond grit
is less than 20~ of the total grit height, and the grit is
25 often lost due to the pull-out when it is worn down to about
1/3 of its original size. After using this saw blade for
some time, typically about 1/3 of the original grit is lost
as evidenced by the empty pockets on the blade.

-2- 20~
. .....
In order to overcome this problem, coating of grit
has been attempted to improve the bonding strength. U.S.
Patent 3,650,714 to Farkas describes a process for applying
such coating on a diamond grit. Typical commercially
5 available coated superabrasives products include DeBeer
Co.'s titanized products for saw grit and General Electric
Co.'s titanized products for CBN grit. For all metal matrix
superabrasives tools the only commercially available coating
for grit is titanized products.
However, it has been found that titanized
products, particularly for diamond grit, are not effective
in improving the attachment strength. The performance
evaluation i.e. life & cutting rate of titanized grit in saw
blade applications did not show noticeable improvement. one
15 problem encountered by the titanized product is its lack of
resistance against oxidation. It is well known that Ti or
TiC can be oxidized in most saw blade manufacturing
conditions. The oxidation can destroy the bonding between
the grit and coating material, and between the coating
20 material and the matrix. The other problem titanized
products faced is the thinness of the coating. Titanized
products typically contain less than 1 micron thick of Ti or
TiC. Such a thin coating can not prevent the dissolution or
removal of the coating from the ~rit surface by the matrix
25 material during the manufacturing process for tools. U.S.
Patents 3,757,878 and 3,757,879 to Wilder describe an
encapsulation method for diamond particles. However, this
is directed to produce a mechanical envelope for the grit
and no chemical bonding is achieved.
30 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide a
chemically coated superabrasives grit.
Another object of this invention is to provide a
firm attachment of the grit in the matrix body of a tool.
It is also an object of this invention to provide
a continuous thick coating of at least 1 micron on the

_3_ 2~ 3
superabrasives grit so the integrity of coating can be
~_ maintained after tool manufacturing process.
It is still another object of this invention to
provide a coating material which is substantially inert to
5 oxidation durins tool manufacturing processes.
Yet another object is to provide abrasive or
cutting tools embodying such chemically bonded coating
superabrasive for improved material removal performance.
A further object is to provide tools with the
10 chemically coated abrasive grit exhibiting better grit
retention, larger grit protrusion, and freer cutting action.
These tools include, for example saw blades, grinding
wheels, dressing tools, drill bits, and lapping tools.
The term "superabrasive" used hereinafter and in
lS the claims means natural, as well as synthetic diamond and
cubic boron nitride (CBN).
The term "chemical bonding" as used herein is
distinguishable from mechanical bonding. In the latter
case, there is no reaction between the two joining members.
20 In the case of "chemical bonding", there is a reaction on
the interface between the two joining members. The reaction
may be, for example, a carbide formation, a boride
formation, a nitride formation, or a solution formed by
_ inter-diffusion between the two joining members.
~ 25 The term "drill bit" used hereinafter and in the
claims comtemplates not only machine tool type drill bits
but also includes drill bits and core bits such as those
commonly employed in the mining and petroleum industry for
earth boring.
According to the present invention, there is
provided a superabrasive grit which is coated with a
relatively non-oxidizable metal of at least one micron
thickness that is strongly bonded to the surface of the grit
by a chemical bond. Briefly, the grit is coated with a
35 metal which is not readily oxidizable selected from W, Ta,
Mo, Nb or alloys thereof. The coated grit is then thermally
treated either before or during the manufacturing process
for tools to form a strong chemical bond between the coating

_4_ ~2~
and the grit such as a carbide layer in the case of a
diamond grit. Tungsten is the preferred ~etal for the
coating. The surface of the grit can optionally be
roughened by either chemical or mechanicai means before
5 being coated to enhance subsequent bonding. The composition
of the matrix must be compatible with the coating materials
- selected for the grit so that under the processing
- conditions for tool manufacturing, the matrix will be
chemically bonded to the coating material. The result is a
10 firmly attached chemically bonded coated superabrasive grit
in a tool matrix.
The interfaces between the superabrasive grit and
the coating, and between the coating and the matrix are
formed by strong chemical bonds. This is distinguished from
- 15 prior art practices where the attachment of grit is
primarily achieved mechanically by the surrounding matrix
material. The coated superabrasive grit when embodied in a
tool in accordance with this invention has the following
advantages:
l. longer life due to less grit pull-outs;
2. higher cutting rate due to larger grit
protrusion; and
3. freer cutting with lower force, lower power,
less heat generation due to larger grit
protrusion.
The coated superabrasive according to this
invention is particularly suitable for grit in drill bits
such as, for example, a sub-component of a cutter having a
particular physical form such as circle, oval, blade and the
30 like; or as an actual cutting component itself, as when the
grit is incorporated in the actual matrix of the bit
protruding from the surface thereof, wearing away, and
exposing other pieces of grit bonded to the matrix. This is
particularly suitable for core bits, although other bits for
35 hard formations can be similarly manufactured.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
According to this invention, the superabrasives
grit surface is first roughened by mechanical or chemical

t -5- ~2~
,., "
means. The roughening produces an uneven surface which
improves the adherence of the grit to the coating material
to be applied later. This improvement of adherence is the
result of increased chemical reactivity of the grit surfaces
5 due to much higher amount of surface imperfections. The
number of unbonded electrons of carbon on the surface will
also increase, thereby enhancing the reaction between the
grit and the coating material. The unevenness of the
surface can also strengthen the mechanical attachment of the
10 grit to the coating material due to the larger surface area
of close contact.
In the practice of this invention, the grits are
optionally roughened at first. A preferred roughening is to
form a uniformly distributed frosted surface. This
15 roughening is accomplished by either mechanical means, such
as by milling with other superabrasive powders, or chemical
means such as by oxidation or etching. For example, a grit
can be tumbled in air or enriched oxygen atmosphere at high
temperature to allow even oxidation on all surfaces. A
20 fluidized bed chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system or a
rotary furnace can both be advantageously employed to
produce the desired results. For chemical etching
processes, oxidants such as potassium dichromate or
potassium nitrate may be optionally used. Employing either
25 method, the weight loss of the grit auring the surface
roughening treatment should be controlled to be less than 5
w/w .
Although the surface roughening is an important
step according to this invention, it may not be necessary
30 for some applications. For example, for smaller sized grit
applications, such as ~or polishing cloths using micron
powders, the roughening step may be eliminated.
After the surface roughening treatment, the grit
is washed and chemically cleaned to remove surface
35 contaminants by methods known in the art. For example,
washing the grit in mineral acids such as with a solution of
nitric or hydrochloric acid, or heating the grit under
hydrogen atmosphere can eliminate most surface contaminants.

-6- 2 U 2~ 4~Q~
After surface cleaning, the grit is coated with a
material which is relati-ve~y oxidation resistant, and which
is a carbide former such as W, Ta, Mo, and Nb, or an alloy
thereof forming a continuous layer having a thickness of at
5 least 1 micron. The coating thickness can vary from about 1
micron to about 50 microns and preferably from about 1
micron to about 30 microns. Such a coating is readily
distinguishable from coatings known in the art. See for
example, the coating obtained in accordance with the
10 description in Farkas U.S. Patent 3,650,714 which is much
thinner than 1 micron. This distinction is also applicable
for other commercially available titanized products.
In the case where diamond grit is used, a car5ide
is formed between the grit and the coating material by
15 heating the coated grit to carbide forming temperatures.
Where CBN is used a nitride bond is formed. As a suitable
alloy coating there may be mentioned for example, W-~iB.
After the first coating material is applied to the
grit, a second coating or any additional layers of coating
20 can be optionally applied over the first layer. The pur ose
of the multi-layers is to provide additional protection of
the ~irst coating layer from oxidation in the air or ~rom
dissolution into the matrix material during the
manufacturing process of the tool, and/or during the cutting
25 action of thb tool. The outer coating can also provide a
better metallurgical joint with the matrix bond material so
as to form a diffusion bonded interface. For most
applications, the outer coating layer need not contain a
carbide former. For example, an electroless outer coating
30 of copper can be used to bond with certain matrix
materials.
The coating is typically applied by known methods
such as chemical vapor deposition described by Wilder in
U.S. Patent 3,757,878. These methods are used to apply
35 these mechanical layers which do not normally contain
oxidation resistant carbide formers.

_7_ 2~
The chemical bonding between the grit and the
coating is achieved by a way depending upon the desired
final product. Thus for example, if the grit is to be
embodied in a saw blade, the processing conditions to form
- 5 the blade, especially the temperature required to form the
blade, will be sufficient to cause the formation of the
chemical bonding. On the other hand, if the desired end
product is formed at different process conditions which will
not induce sufficient chemically bonding, the coated grit is
- 10 pre-treated under conditions such as in a furnace for
example at an effective carbide forming temperature such as
about 850~C to cause the formation chemical bonding before
using the grit in the end product.
After the coating is applied to the grit, the
15 coated grit can be used like an uncoated one for the
~ subsequent processing for making tools. In the case of
making a saw blade for example, the grit is mixed with a
well blended matrix metal powder and then either hot pressed
at about 800~C to 1000~C to shape, or infiltrated with a
20 binder alloy. The result is a saw blade with grit
chemically bonded by the coating material and coating
material chemically bonded to the matrix material. Simply
- put, all the interfaces are joined by chemical bonds.
In another embodiment of this invention, the
25 coated grit is packed to form a very high density mass. For
example, by means of vibrational packing, monosized grit
(500 micron in size) can reach a packing efficiency of about
55% (the rest, 45%, is porosity). By adding a second sized
grit (70 micron), which is about 1/7 of the first sized
30 grit, the packing efficiency can be increased to about 77%.
A further addition of the third sized grit which is again
about 1/7 in size of the second one, the whole mass can
achieve a packing efficiency of over 83~. After the grit is
packed, the mass is infiltrated by an alloy which has a
35 melting point below the degradation temperature of the
superabrasives grit. If a diamond grit is used, the
temperature limit is less than about 1100~C for synthetic

-8- 2~
......
grit depending on ~uality, and for about 1300~C for natural
grit. Because of the p~esence of the coating, the binder
alloy infiltrates the highly packed mass of superabrasives
grit relatively easily. Without the coating, most binder
5 alloys can not infiltrate such a mass.
Following this embodiment we obtain a
superabrasive-metal composite material, such as
diamond-metal composite which we call "Diamet". This
composite material possesses higher impact resistance than a
10 typical polycrystalline superabrasives aggregate because of
the presence of the metal binder. For example, we have
obtained a Diamet mass which is tougher than a
polycrystalline diamond (PC3) material when these products
are subjected to impact testing.
The "Diamet" material is readily bondable onto a
cemented WC substrate to form, for example, cutters useful
for drill bits for earth boring applications. Such cutters
with backing have been tested in a laboratory and the
cutting results are comparable to those cutters made of
20 compacts such as Geoset.
The method, according to this invention, offers
many advantages. For example, it does not involve using
very high pressure which is required for making a
polycrystalline superabrasives aggregate such as a PCD;
25 therefore, the cost for making this composite~material can
be much less than the prior art methods. The size and shape
of this material can also be more flexible without being
restricted by the high pressure chamber.
In order to further illustrate the practice of
30 this invention, the following examples are included:
EXAMPLE I
A natural diamond grit available under the trade
name of EMBS supplied by DeBeers Co. with a size (30/40 U.S.
mesh) having a F.~.P.A. designation of D602 was coate~ by a
35 tungsten layer using fluidized bed CVD method. Thus, the
diamond grits were dipped in an acid solution comprising

~ 9 ~ 3 ~ ~ ~
; ~ of hydroflouric and nitric acid for about 1 minute. They
were rinsed in deionized water for 15 minutes ~ollowed by
washing in dilute NaOH solution for 2 minutes and a further
rinsing in deionized water. The cleaned grits were dried in
5 an oven. The dried diamond grits were loaded in a chemical
vapor deposition (CVD) reactor comprising a graphite tube.
After the diamond grits were loaded in the reactor, argon
was introduced into the reaction chamber at a pressure of
about 5 torr for about 30 minutes. Thereafter, the pressure
10 was changed to 0.5 torr to allow water to evaporate. Then a
gas comprising Ar, He, H2 at 1:1:1 ratio was introduced into
the chamber at a pressure of 5 torr and at flow rate of 0.21
liter per minute while the reactor was heated up to 900~C in
16 minutes and held at 900~C for 30 minutes. The
15 temperature was lowered to 700~C in 3 minutes and then the
pressure was raised to 12 torr. The flow rate of the gas
was increased to fluidize the diamond grits in the reactor
WF6 simultaneously (tungsten hex fluoride) was introduced to
effect the deposition of tungsten on the diamond reaching 11
20 micron in about 75 minutes. Finally, a flow of argon only
was introduced to allow the reactor to cool down to room
temperature. The tungsten coating thickness on the product
was 7.75 micron. The coated grit was made into saw segments
by hot pressing with a matrix material made of 80% Cu-Sn
25 alloy and 20% cemented tungsten carbide grit. These
segments were used to cut an abrasive concrete sample
containing chert grains. The results indicated that the
pull-out loss of the grit was reduced to less than 10% on
the cutting surface after testing. This low pull-out loss
30 is in sharp contrast with 40% from a parallel test using
uncoated grit under identical conditions.
EXAMPLE II
A synthetic diamond grit available under the trade
name SDA100 also supplied by DeBeers Co. with a size having
35 a F.E.P.A. designation of D602 was coated with a tungsten
layer of about 10 micron thickness as in Example I. The

-10~
coated grit was spread out to form a plane of tightly packed
monolayer in a matrix powder body made of tungsten carb}de.
The assembly was pre-pressed into shape and later hot
pressed at a temperature of 815~C and at a pressure of 3,500
5 psi. The hot pressed mass was in a dog-bone shape. The
tensile test specimen was then subject to a pulling test
(uniaxial tensile test). The results indicated the coated
grit in such a geometry can support a tensile strength of
15KSI. Uncoated grit under the identical testing conditions
10 showed virtually no tensile strength.
The above coated grit was also overcoated by an
electroless deposited nickel boron layer of about 30 micron
thick by a procedure supplied by Allied-Kelite division of
Witco Corp. A solution comprising of nickel-boron,
15 available from Witco Corp., was employed. In the first step
of coating, the tungsten surface was cleansed using a
solution such as~Niklad Alprep 230 solution from Witco by
heating the solution to 65.5~C and the diamond grits were
dipped in for 5 minutes. Then the diamond grits were rinsea
20 in tap water until the foam was gone. A sensitizer
available as~Niklad 261, from Witco, was a~plied to the
diamond grit surfaces by dipping the grits therein at 224~C
for 2 minutes. Then the diamond grits were rinsed in
deionized water. A catalyst available under the trademark
25 Niklad 262 was then applied to the diamond grit surface by
dipping the diamond grits therein at 43~C for 4 minutes at a
PH of 1.9 to 3. Then the diamond grits were rinsed in
deionized water. The treated diamond grits were dried and
dipped in a Ni-B solution available as*Niklad 752 solution
30 at a PH of about 6 and at a temperature of 80~C. The nickel
layer contained about 3~ of boron. Under the same testing
condition the tensile strength was 20KSI.
In a parallel test, a same type grit was first
roughened on surfaces and then coated by the same double
35 layers. The surface roughening was done by a milling action
against diamond micron powders in a water medium. The

TR~DE MARK
C
. , .

0 ~
_ milling lasted for 24 hours and the grit had a final weight
loss of about 0.7%. Under the above test conditions, the
tensile strength was increased to 35KSI.
EXAMPLE III
Tungsten coated diamond micron powders produced by
the method described in Example I with size of 500 micron &
60 micron were packed by vibration to form an uniformly
distributed mass of 80% packing efficiency. The mass was
then infiltrated by an alloy composed of copper, manganese
10 and titanium under vacuum at 1050~C for 20 minutes. The
"Diamet" was made into a cutter and used to cut a granite
log with coolant. The wear resistance was measured and
- compared with other commercially available PCD materials
tested under the same conditions. The results indicated
15 that the wear resistance of "Diamet" is comparable to
*Geoset-type PCD supplied by General Electric Company. The
latter product is made under high pressure conditions in
diamond stability region. The same "Diamet" sample was also
subject to an erosion test by injecting an abrasive
20 containing mud. The erosion resistance was found to be
comparable to infiltrated tungsten carbide slug which is
typically used as the face of a matrix bit body. The
"Diamet" material with such high wear resistance and erosion
resistance is useful to form cutters in drill bits for rock
25 drilling. The drill bits known in the art typically used
PCD (such as Geoset) or tungsten carbide inserts.
EXAMPLE IV
"Diamet" cutters made according to Example III
were brazed into a bit body by a typical brazing procedure
known in the art employing an 8-1/2" bit body.
TRADE MARK




,~

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2028415 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1999-01-12
(22) Filed 1990-10-23
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1991-05-23
Examination Requested 1994-04-29
(45) Issued 1999-01-12
Deemed Expired 2008-10-23

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1990-10-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1991-03-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1992-10-26 $100.00 1992-09-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1993-10-25 $100.00 1993-09-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1994-10-24 $100.00 1994-09-23
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1995-10-24 $150.00 1995-09-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1996-10-24 $150.00 1996-09-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1997-10-24 $150.00 1997-10-02
Final Fee $300.00 1998-06-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1998-10-26 $150.00 1998-10-07
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 1999-10-25 $150.00 1999-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2000-10-23 $200.00 2000-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2001-10-23 $200.00 2001-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2002-10-23 $200.00 2002-10-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2003-10-23 $200.00 2003-10-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2004-10-25 $250.00 2004-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2005-10-24 $450.00 2005-10-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2006-10-23 $450.00 2006-10-02
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NORTON COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
CHEN, SY-HWA
SUNG, CHIEN-MIN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1998-12-31 1 25
Cover Page 1993-12-24 1 14
Abstract 1993-12-24 1 8
Claims 1993-12-24 2 53
Description 1993-12-24 11 499
Description 1998-02-18 11 539
Claims 1998-02-18 3 140
Correspondence 1998-06-19 1 35
Correspondence 1998-07-27 1 46
Fees 1996-09-13 1 93
Fees 1995-09-18 1 94
Fees 1994-09-23 1 104
Fees 1993-09-17 1 103
Fees 1992-09-24 1 73
Correspondence 1996-09-20 2 76
Correspondence 1997-04-25 2 60
Correspondence 1994-06-08 1 47
Correspondence 1991-04-15 1 17
Prosecution-Amendment 1994-04-29 1 26
Prosecution-Amendment 1994-06-15 1 26
Prosecution-Amendment 1997-03-20 2 70
Prosecution-Amendment 1997-10-24 1 31
Prosecution-Amendment 1998-01-20 1 28
Prosecution-Amendment 1998-11-03 7 253
Prosecution-Amendment 1998-09-14 3 98
Prosecution-Amendment 1994-04-29 1 47
Prosecution-Amendment 1991-03-15 1 35
Assignment 1990-10-24 4 176