Language selection

Search

Patent 2037275 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2037275
(54) English Title: STEAM EXPLOSION PULPING PROCESS FOR PAPERMAKING
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION DE PATE A PAPIER PAR CUISSON A LA VAPEUR SUIVIE DE DETENTE EXPLOSIVE DE CELLE-CI
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract






ABSTRACT



This invention relates to an improved process preparing pulp suitable for
papermaking, resulting in lower cost, higher yield and brightness consisting of short time
saturated steam cooking of chips impregnated with alkaline solutions of sulphites and
carbonates, chlorides, sulfates or bicarbonates in the temperature range of 180 to 210°C
followed by explosive decompression and fiber refining.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or priviledge
is claimed are defined as followed:
1. A process for ultra-high-yield pulping providing yield in excess of 85% to
produce pulp suitable for making paper, which comprises the steps of
thoroughly impregnation wood fragments with an alkaline aqueous liquor
including a soluble sulphite or other hydrophylic agents capable of acting to
provide hydrophylic groups and/or act as an antioxidant, for example water
soluble sulphite, sodium sulphite, potassium sulphite, magnesium sulphite alone
or in combination with sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, magnesium
carbonate, magnesium sulphate, preferably in an amount of.1-16% absorbed
by the wood fragments, or other hydrophylic agents, steam cooking the
impregnated wood fragments with saturated steam at superatmospheric
pressure and at an elevated temperature; subjecting the cooked wood
fragments to explosive decompression to partially defibrate same; transferring
the partially defibrated fragments to a refiner and refining the softened and
defibrated fragment to provide pulp, characterized in that the steam cooking is
conducted at the cooking temperature in the range of about 180°C to 210°C,
preferably 190°C to 200°C whereby the cooking pressure is about 10 atm to
about 15.5 atm.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the step of impregnation wood fragments is
also carried out in the substantial absence of air achieved by replacing air with
saturated steam.
3. The process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the time of cooking is
in the range of about 30 seconds to about 6 minutes, preferably 1 minute to 4
minutes.




13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTI(3N ~ ~



Ingruber et al., Pulp and Paper Manufacture, Volume 4, TAPPI, CPPA, p. 160
(1985) define that convention conventional ultra-high-yield chemithermomechanical or
5 chemimechanical pulping is preferably conducted at a pH level between 4 and 9, and
involves either liquid or vapor phase cooking with sodium sulphite-bisulphite solutions
for about 10 to 30 minutes at a temperature between 60 and 175C. It is generally
accepted that the chemical treatment is mainly responsible for permanent fibre
softening, increase in long fiber content, fibre specific surface and conformability, as
10 demonstrated by Heitner et al., Pulp and Paper Can., (84)11: T252-T257 (1983).
There is another softening approach which consists of a steam treatment of chips
at high temperatures followed by explosive decompression.
The production of pulp using high-pressure and high steam chip softening w011
above glass transition ternperatures of lignin should theoretically lead to lower energy
15 consumption in subsequent refining stages.
The initial research in the field of high-pressure steam cooking, followed by
defibration by explosion, was made by Mason, U.S. Pat. 1 824 221; ? 645 623; 2 494
545; 2 379 8290. The masonite pulp obtained according to a two stage Sprout-
Waldron refining procedure showed weak physical strength, dark color and yield loss
20 of 16% ~o 20%, and revealed itself simply unsuitable for the production of paper
according Koran et al., Pulp and Paper Can., 79(3~: T107~T-113 (1978). Mamers and
al., TAPPI, 64(7): 93-96 ~1981); APPITA, 29(5): 356-362 (1976) investigated
explosion pulping of pinus elliotti wood chips with the help of high pressure carbon
dioxide solutions and bagasse of wheat straw explosion pulping under high pressure
25 of nitrogen. Paper properties which were obtained were similar to that of CTMP/CMP
pulps, but at the expense of brightness. The major problem to overcome are
oxidation, as well as hydrolytic degradation of fibers leading to brightness and yield

loss.

rJ ~


It has been suggested by Vit et Kokta, Vit et al., Can. Pat. 1 212 505 (1986) that
the ultra-high-yield (90%~) pulp suitable for papermaking can be produced by vapor
phase steam explosion cooking. The initial properties of papers mads from exploded
softwood chips were similar to those of TMP. However, refining energy was about
5 20% to 25% lower. Recently, a pulping process entitled "Process for Preparing Pulp
for Paper Making", Kokta B.V., Can. Pat. 1 230 208 (1987); U.S. Pat. 4 798 651
(1989); Can. Pat. Appl. #542 643 (May 1987), referred to as "Steam Explosion Pulping
Process" or "S-pulping" has been proposed both for softwoods and hardwoods. In
this process, impregnation and cooking conditions ware aimed at minimizing yield and
10 brightness loss, maximizing resulting paper properties and decreasing specific refining
energy. The steam explosion pulping process consists of the chemical impregnation
of chips, short duration saturated steam cooking at temperatures varying from 180C
to 210C, pressure release, refining and bleaching ~if necessary).
Kokta et al., Paperi Ja Puu - Paper and Tirnber, 9, 1044-105~ (1989), have
15 shown that the specific refining energy of aspen explosion pulps is at least 50% lower
than that of CMP pulp of similar yield and ionic content level, while paper strength
increases by up to 50%. C:ornpare at similar CSF levels, explosion hardwood pulps
(i.e. aspen, maple, hardwood mixtures, eucalyptus) at 90% yield provide similar or
higher paper properties then commercial low yield (_ 50/O) bleached hardwood pulps.

OBJECTS



The object of this invention is to provide a process in which additional yield
saving and brightness level increase and cost decrease are obtained when compared
25 to previous invention of Kokta, Can. Pat. 1 230 208 (1987) by substituting sodium
hydroxide with milder swelling agents like: sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate,
magnesium carbonate, magnesium chloride, etc.


f~ ~3 t~ ~ ~J ~
THE INVENTIONI



The major problems accompanying previous processes using expiosive
decompression are believed to have been the degradation due to the oxidation of
5 woocl and acid hydrolysis leading to loss in brightness, deterioration of fiber and paper
properties and loss of yield. The approach adopted by this invention is therefore to
attempt to curtail hydrolytic and oxidative wood degradation and thsreby to protect
against loss of yield, brightness and fiber strength. The loss of fiber strength will be
particularly great if the degree of polymerization of the cellulose falls below the critical
10 value which is about 500-600. Hydrolytic degradation will also cause yield loss due
mainly to degradation of hemi-cellulose.
The process of this invention tries to achieve a positive improvement in the
strength of the paper that will be produced from the fibers by increasing the number
of hydrophilic groups on the fiber surfaces thereby adding to the potential sites for
15 hydrogen bonding.
The conditions for the achiavement of the foregoing objects in accordance with
the process of this invention are as follows:
1 ) The wood fra~ments, having fibers suitable for paper making, such as chips,
are in a form in which thorough chemical impregnation can be achieved in a
20 reasonable time.
2) There is an initial thorough impregnation of the chips or other wood fragments
by an alkaline aqueous liquor having at least one agent acting to produce hydrophilic
groups and as an antioxidant which is capable of protecting the chips against
oxidation and develops hydrophilic groups during the cooking stage. The same
25 chemical may act as both an agent to produce hydrophilic groups and as an
antioxidant or these functions may be performed by separate chemicals. At the end
of cooking the pH should not be lower than about 6.0, so that acids released during


cooking will be neutralized. Preferably a swelling agent is also used in the case of
high density wood.
3) The impregnated chips are cooked using saturated steam in the substantial
absence of air at high temperature and pressure.
4) After cooking, the chips that have been steam cooked are subjected to
explosive decompression to result in chips which are softened and mostly defibrated.
5) The defibrated chips are preferably washed and then, without undue delay,
and preferably immediately, refined to provide pulp.
The steps of the process of this invention which will for convenience be referred
10 to as the improved explosion process, will now be considered in more detail.



The wood trapments
The starting material will normaly be chips in chich the fibers are of a length
suitable for paper making. Shavings could also be used but sawdust would be
15 undesirable except as a minor part of the total furnish as the fibers are partially cut.
The chips would also, as is well known, be suitable in the sense of being free
from bark and foreign matter.
It is desirable for the purposes of this invention that coarse chips be avoided as
otherwise the subsequent impregnation may deposit chemicals only on the chip
20 surface, unless impregnation is carried out for a very long time. Another problem with
coarse chips is that cooking would not be complete. It is best to use shredded or thin
chips of a 4-8 mm thickness. It has been found that this process is applicable to
hardwoods, jack pine and larch, blaGk spruce, doublas fir giving stronger papers at
lower refining energy compared with conventional chemo-thermo mechanical or chemi-

25 mechanical pulping.

!me@s~
The purpose of impregnation is to protect the chips against oxiclation duringcooking and during transfer from the cooking vessel to the refiner. It is also an
objective to provide a positive increase in strength by developing hydrophylic groups
5 on the fiber surface during steam treatment. This will then provide additional sites for
hydrogen bonding.
The preferred anti-oxidant is sodium sulphite Na2$O3 which also forms
hydrophilic groups, and which is available at a low cost. It is used to provide a
concentration of absorbed chemical of about 1 to 15%. Concentrations below 4%
10 would be used where brightness protection is unimportant and high strength is not
required. Where, however, brightness is important the sodium sulphite should be at
least 4%. If physical properties are important these will be improved by using a
concentration of at least 4% sodium sulphite and will be further improved as the
concentration is furiher increased towards 16%. The concentration of the solution is
15 preferably about tha same as percent of chemical to be absorbed where there are
equal quantities of chips and liquor. For example, a ton of chips of 50% consistency
mixed with one ton of 8% solution will result in about 8% absorbed on the pulp. Of
irnportance is thorough impregnation to distribute the antioxidant evenly rather than
depositing it just on the surface. Other antioxidants that can be used are potassium
20 sulphite or magnesium sulphite. Ammonium sulphite could be used if cooking
conditions are not severe or with a buffer. Complexing agents such as ethylene
diamine tetracetic acid ~EDTA), sodium diethylene triaminepentacetate (DTPA),
sodium tripolyphosphate (TPF) and other complexing agents known in the art as being
usable under alkaline conditions may be added to minimize the catalytic effect of
25 metals such as iron on oxidative degradation.
It is desirable also to use a swelling agent to assist the antioxidant or hydrophilic
agent in penetrating the wood and this contributes also to softening the chip. This is


~J ~ J
of particular value in the case of high density wood. Suitable swelling agents are
sodium or potassium hydroxide or ammonium hydroxide or sodium carbonate or
sodium bicarbonate or magnesium carbonate or magnesium sulphate which will
contribute also to providing hydrophilic groups. Other swelling agents that can be
5 used and which may be desirable as auxiliary swelling agents for high densi~y wood
are zinc chloride, sodium chloride, sodium bromide, magnesium chloride, calcium
isocyanate, Schweitzers solution, cupriethylenediamne (C.E.D.) tetraethylammonium
hydroxide, dimethyldibenzylammonium hydroxide. The concentration of swelling agent
and conditions of swelling must be controlled in such a way as to avoid any
10 dissolution of the hollocellulose. Thus the percentage of swelling agent in the
impregnating solution will be in the range of about 1 to 4% depending on the agent
and the conditions.
The impregnating solution must be alkaline and have enough free hydroxyl to be
able to neutralize the liberated wood acids such as formic acid and acetic acid.
15 Normally the starting pH is about 7.5 or higher and the final pH after steam cooking
should be at least 6 or higher.
The time of impregnation at atmospheric pressure in holding tanks typically
ranges from about 12 hours to 24 hours at a temperature of about 30C to 60C.
Approximately equal weights of chips and of aqueous impregnating solution can be
20 used. For industrial purposes, however, the time may be shortened to an hour or to
minutes by irnpregnating with steam under pressure and at a higher temperature. The
pressure should be up to about 1 atmospheric extra pressure at a temperature Gf
about 100C to 110C. To improve impregnation the chips should be compressed in
advance of impregnation in cool solutions of chemicals. Under thase conditions,
25 penetration will be achieved in a shorter time, but penetration is what predominantly
occurs. There i5 no significant cooking resulting in no significant sulphonic and
carboxylic groups increasa.



Steam cookin~
The impregnated chips are steam cooked at a high temperature and pressure.
Equipmen~ and methods that can be used for preliminary compacting of the
impregnated chips, for cooking the chips with steam and for the discharge of the chips
5 under conditions of explosive decompression and described in Canadian Patent 1 070
537 dated January 29, 1980; 1 070 646 dated January 29, 1980; 1 119 033 datsd
March 2, 1982 and 1 138 708 dated January 4, 1983, all of which were granted to
Stake Technology Ltd. The equipment used in the examples was acquired from ~hat
compagny.
The temperature of cooking should be within the range of about 180C to 210C
and preferably within the range 190-200C, which is in excess of the temperatures
considered possible according to the publications of Asplund and Higgins previously
referred to. These temperatures correspond with a pressure of 10 atmospheres for
180C and 15.5 atmospheres for 200C. It is these high pressures and temperatures
1 ~ which make a very important contribution to ensuring excellent penetration of the chips
by the cooking liquor and results in higher efficience of ionic groups formation on fiber
surface.
The cookiny may be preceded by steam flushing under low pressure steam at
100C for a short period such as one minute. This is a matter of convenience, in that
20 with a batch reactor the cooking vessel is initially open to the atmosphere, to eliminate
air. This air would be disadvantageous in ~hat it would result in oxidation if it were
trapped in the cooking vessel. Additional antioxidant may if desired be added at this
stage. Steam flushing is desirable with a batch reactor but would not be necessary
for a continuous reactor.
This preliminary treatment is then followed by cooking for about 30 seconds to
6 minutes and preferably about 1 to 4 minutes.
It has been found that within reasonable limits there is a property improvement

J~

by increasing the time (min) X temperature (C) multiple assigned as constant K. By
increasing this constant from 285 to 760 in the case of black spruce at about the
same freeness (157-167) the burst index increased from 3.15 to 4.41 and breaking
length from 6.3 to 7.6 and tear from 5.5 to 5.8. Refining energy dropped from 3.2 to
5 3.1 and brightness dropped from 59.7 to 55.1.



Ex~losive decompression
After cooking the pressure is instantaneously released and the chips are
exploded into a release vessel. If there is to be a delay between release of the chips
10 and refining it is important to cool the chips down by washing them. Washing may
also be desirable for the purpose of chemical recovery.
It is desirable immediately to refine ~he chips after explosive decompression.
Otherwise, if the chips are stored, some oxidation will occur with resultant loss of
brightness. The rapidity with which this will occur depends on how much residual
15 antioxidant is present at that time and on the temperature of the chips and the extent
of exposure to oxygen. Preferably, therefore, refining is immediate so that it is
unnecessary to incur the cost of excess antioxidant. In any event, undue delay should
be avoided. Such delay is regarded as bein~ undue if oxidation takes place to an
extent that will materially affect brightness.
The chips resulting from the explosive decompression are softened and partially
defibrated.



Refininq
Refining in the experiments described below standards using an atmospheric
25 laboratory refining was conducted at 2% consistency level using a blender coupled
with an energy meter model EW 604.
According to A.C. Shaw "Simulation of Secondary Refining" Pulp and Paper

Canada 85(6): T152-T155 (1984) the blender results closely match those obtained
with industrial refiners. Properties were evaluated af~er preparing paper sheets
according to standard CPPA testing methods.
Refining energies are usually low and can be expected to be in the range of 1.7
5 to a, MJ/kg, hardwoods, CSF _ 100 ml, which is considerably lower than that of
conventional CMP and similar to that describad in Kokta, Can. Pat. 1 230 208 and
U.S. Pat. 4 798 651 ~1989).
The present invention is described in the enclosed example.



1 0 EXAMPLE
~s
Freshly cut and naturally grown aspen trees from the Joliette region of Quebec
were debarked, chipped and screened at La Station Forestière Duchesnay, Quebec.
Average chip size after screening, was as follows: length 2.5 to 3.75 cm; width: 1
15 2 cm; thickness: 1 to 9 mm with maximum distribution at 5 mm.



ation
150 g of chips (= 50% siccity) were mixed in P!astic ba~s aloncl with 150 ~ of
a solution made up of 8% Na2SO3 alone or with 1% of NaOH or MgCI2 or NaHCO3 or
MgCO3. Time of impregnation: 24 hours; temperature of impregnation: 60C.
Liquid/chip ratio during impregnation was equal to 3.
In addition, 0.5% DTPA was used in applied cooking liquors.



Cooking
Explosion pulps have been prepared using vapor phase team cooking of
chemicaly pretreated aspen wood chips. Pulps have been prepared by using cooking
temperature 190C, with cooking time 4 minutes.

7~

Cooking took place using saturated steam in a laboratory batch reactor build by
Stake Tech. Co. Cooking was preceded by one minute steam flushing at atmosphsric
pressure. After cooking, the pressure was instantaneously released and chips which
exploded into the release vessel were washed and cooled down with one liter of tap
5 water, and subsequently refined after being stored in a cold room. The reported
amount of steam used for cooking varied from 0.5 to 1 kg of steam for 1 kg of chips.
Yield was measured as follows: exploded chips (75 g) were washed wi~h one liter of
tap water and subsequently defibrated for 90 seconds in a laboratory blender at 2%
consistency. The pulp was washed again with one liter of water, dried at 105C to
10 cons~ant weight and the resulted weights were compared to the initial O.D. weight of
chips.



Refinin~
Laboratory refining was also done using a domestic blender Osterizer B-8614 at
15 a consistency level of 2%. Defibration and refining energy was measured using a
HIOKI model 3181-01 powermeter with an integrator. Relative specific refining energy
was calculated by substracted bl0nding energy of fully beated pulp from the total
energy needed to defibrate and blend the fiber suspension.



20 Propertv evaluation
Paper sheets were prepared and tested according to standard CPPA testing
rnethods on 1.2 g sheets. Brightness (Elrepho) was evaluated on sheets made with
deinosized water. Ionic content (sulfonate and carboxylate ions was determined by
means of conductometric titration.

Bleachinq
Bleaching was carried out wsing 2% of hydrogen peroxide, 2% NaOH; 0.05% of





MgSO4; 2% of sodium silicate; 0.5% DTPA; pulp concentration: 2()%; bleaching time:
2 hours; bleaching temperature: 80C; neutralization with Na2S2O5 to pH _ 5 5;
washing with de-ionized water.



CONCLlJSlONS



In the following Figures 1 to 4, the paper proper~ies of improved steam explosion
process are compared to that of ordinary explosion process as defined in Kokta, Can.
Pat. 230 208 (19~7) and Kokta, U.S. Pat. 4 798 651 (1989~ using either 8% Na2SO3
10 or 8% Na2SO3 ~ 1% NaQH.
It is obvious from Figure 1, that substituting 1% NaOH with 1% of MgCI2 or 1%
NaH(::03 resulted in 3% pul~yield increase. Futhermore, this incresement was six
percent when 1% MgCO3 was used.
The effect of chemical pre-treatment on brightness is shown in Figure 2. It it
1~ obvious, that brown stock brightness increases from 59.9% of that obtained with 8%
Na2SO3 + 1/c~ NaOH to 64.3%; 65.4%; 64.5% when 1% NaOI I is substituted either
with 1% of Mg(:~12 or NaHCO3 or M~CO3.
The increase of yield as well as brightness is obtained in the case of NaOH
substitution by NaHCO3 or MgCO3 without any breaking length lost as demonstrated
20 in Figure 3. On the other hand, system with MgCI2 gave lower strength.
The results in Figure 4 indicates also ~hat by substituting NaOH with either
NaHCO3 or MgCO3 leads to the same low level of relative specific refining energy.
The comparable physical strength as well as relative specific refining energy of the
above indicated systems can be explained by similar ionic content as indicated in
2~ Figure 5.
In addition, the cost of NaHCO3 (US$ 0.19$/lb) or MgCO3 (US$ 0.75$/lb) is
cheaper than that of NaOH (US~ 1 .13$/lb).


Therefore the present invention, consisting in substituting NaOH with carbonatesor bicarbonates results not only in the yield and brightness advantage but also in cost
decrease.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2037275 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(22) Filed 1991-02-28
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1992-08-29
Examination Requested 1997-11-13
Dead Application 2002-08-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-02-28 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE 2001-04-09
2001-08-09 R30(2) - Failure to Respond

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1991-02-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1993-03-01 $50.00 1992-08-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1994-02-28 $50.00 1993-10-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1995-02-28 $50.00 1994-08-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1996-02-28 $75.00 1995-03-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1997-02-28 $75.00 1996-11-27
Request for Examination $200.00 1997-11-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1998-03-02 $75.00 1997-12-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1999-03-01 $75.00 1998-12-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2000-02-28 $75.00 1999-12-30
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 2001-04-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 10 2001-02-28 $100.00 2001-04-09
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 11 2002-02-28 $100.00 2001-12-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KOKTA, BOHUSLAV V.
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-04-16 1 18
Abstract 1994-04-16 1 13
Claims 1994-04-16 1 47
Drawings 1994-04-16 5 257
Description 1994-04-16 12 514
Fees 2001-04-09 1 32
Assignment 1991-02-28 7 220
Prosecution-Amendment 1997-11-13 1 38
Fees 1999-12-30 1 23
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-02-09 3 126
Fees 1998-12-22 1 27
Fees 2001-12-17 1 22
Fees 1996-11-27 1 52
Fees 1995-03-20 1 59
Fees 1994-08-08 1 83
Fees 1993-10-25 1 44
Fees 1992-08-13 1 67