Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates in general to an apparatus and
method for estimating the position of a rotor of a
commutated motor operating without a shaft position sensor
and, specifically, to estimating rotor position from the
inductance characteristics of unenergized phases of the
motor.
BACEGROUND
Because of recent developments in power semiconductor
devices such as power MOSFETs and insulated gate
thyristors (IGTs), electronically commutated motors such
as variable reluctance (VR) and brushless permanent magnet
(PM) motors have gained attention relative to other types
of motors suitable for variable-speed drive applications.
This increased attention derives from the fact that
electronically commutated motors compare very favorably
with other types of motors typically used as variable-
speed drives. For example, their speed versus average
torque curves are fairly linear with no discontinuities.
They are rugged and robust and therefore well suited for
heavy duty use. They have excellent heat dissipation
qualities, and they do not require brushes or slip rings.
Moreover, using state-of-the-art semiconductor technology
for controllers, the efficiency of brushless commutated
motors compares very favorably with other classes of
-1-
39-421/naf
i~~ v;'~'~'~r
,:r.~. J
variable-speed motors such as inventor-driven AC motors.
Additionally, VR motors are the lowest cost type of motor
to manufacture. Their drive circuits are the simplest and
lowest cost compared to drives for other variable-speed
motors.
As variable-speed drives, VR motors are designed for
efficient power conversion rather than for particular
torque or control characteristics typically required in
stepper motor applications, and the pole geometry and
control-strategies differ accordingly. For example, the
number of rotor teeth is relatively small in an
electronically commutated reluctance motor (e. g., variable
reluctance stepper motors), giving a large step angle, and
the conduction angle is, generally, modulated as a
function of both speed and torque to optimize operation as
a variable-speed drive. In continuously rotating,
variable speed applications, VR motors are often called
switched reluctance or SR motors to distinguish them as a
class from VR motors operated as stepper motors.
Hereinafter, continuous drive VR motors are simply called
SR motors.
Electronically commutated motors conventionally have
multiple poles on both the stator and rotor -- i.e., they
are doubly salient. For the SR motor, there are phase
windings on the stator but no windings or magnets on the
rotor. For PM motors, however, permanent magnets are
-2-
39-~21/naf
~C~~~~-"~~
mounted on the rotor. In a conventional configuration of
either type of motor, each pair of diametrically opposite
stator poles carry series connected windings that form an
independent phase of a power signal.
Torque is produced by switching current into each
winding of a phase in a predetermined sequence that is
synchronized with the angular position of the rotor, so
that the associated stator pole is polarized and the
resulting magnetic force attracts the nearest rotor pole.
The current is switched off in each phase before the poles
of the rotor nearest the stator poles of that phase rotate
past the aligned position; otherwise, the magnetic force
of the attraction would produce a negative or breaking
torque. For SR motors, the torque developed is
independent of the direction of current flow in the phase
windings so that unidirectional current pulses
synchronized with rotor movement can be applied to the
stator phase windings by a convertor using unidirectional
current switching elements such as thyristors or
transistors.
The converters for electronically commutated motors '
operate by switching the stator phase current on and off
in synchronism with rotor position. By properly
positioning the firing pulses relative to the angle of the
rotor, forward or reverse operation and motoring or
generating operation can be obtained.
-3-
3~-421/naf
2C~~~°'_''5
J ~I ..,Y,
Usually, the desired commutation of a phase current
is achieved by feeding back a rotor position signal to a
controller from a shaft position sensor -- e.g., an
encoder or resolver. For cost reasons in small drives and
reliability reasons in larger drives and to reduce, weight
and inertia in all such drives, it is desirable to
eliminate this shaft position sensor.
To this end, various approaches have previously been
proposed for indirect sensing of the rotor position by
monitoring terminal valtages and currents of the motor.
One such approach, referred to as waveform detection,
depends upon the back electromotive forces (emf) and is,
therefore, unreliable at low speeds. Another approach is
described in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,611,157 and 4,642,543
assigned to General Electric Company of Schenectady, New
York. In these patents, the average d.c. link current is
used to dynamically stabilize a drive for a SR motor.
Such systems are believed to be limited by the average
nature of their feedback information and by the tendency
of the SR motor to fitter at start-up.
In U.S. Patent No. 4,772,839 assigned to General
Electric Company of Schenectady, New York, a sampling
pulse is injected into each of the unenergized phases of a
SR motor. Rotor position is estimated by firing an
unenergized phase for a time period short enough that the
build-up of current and the motion of the rotor axe
-4-
39-421/naf
~C~~~'~~'S
negligible. The slope of the initial current rise in the
unenergized phase is used to determine inductance. By
sampling more than one phase, the direction of the rotor
rotation is determined. Specifically, the sampling in
each phase provides two possible angles for the rotor.
Two angles are possible because the rotor can be turning
in either clockwise or counterclockwise directions. By
sampling in two phases and comparing the rotor angles
derived from the sampling of the two phases, the correct
or actual rotor angle is identified since only one of the
two angles identified by each phase will be equal to one
of the two angles in the other phase. This common angle
is identified as the actual position of the rotor with
respect to its direction of rotation. The estimated rotor
angles are derived from absolute values of the inductance.
Therefore, the control system must be precisely matched
with a particular motor.
In U.S. Patent No. 4,520,302, assigned to National
Research Development Corporation, a control circuit for SR
motors is disclosed that utilizes the fact that the
inductance of a phase winding is dependent on rotor
position and varies substantially sinusoidally from a
maximum to a minimum as the rotor advances over a pole .
pitch. The control circuit utilizes the variation of
inductance to measure certain characteristics of current
flow in an appropriate one of the windings in order to
_5_
39-421/naf
derive an indication of rotor position and thus provide
closed-loop control of the motor. Like the control system
of the foregoing '839 patent, the absolute value of the
inductance of the winding must be determined in order to
derive a rotor position.
SOMP4AR~! Oh T'~E INVENTION
It is the primary object of the invention to provide
a closed-loop control for an electronically commutated
motor that detects the instantaneous position of the rotor
without the use of a dedicated electromechanical or other
sensor in a manner that is substantially independent of
the specific electromagnetic characteristics of the motor.
No sensor attached to the motor itself is required. All
sensing is done through existing power leads.
It is a related object of the invention to provide a
closed-loop control system for an electronically
commutated motor that can be used with many different
types of electronically commutated motors of the same
class, but having a range of electromagnetic
characteristics.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a
control system for electronically commutated motors having
the foregoing characteristics and additionally having good
noise immunity properties.
_~_
39--4z1/naf
~fi"~ ~°~ ~ a
It is also an object of the invention to provide a
circuit for remotely detecting the position of the rotor
of a electronically commutated motor without requiring the
analysis of a power signal delivered to a phase winding.
In this connection, it is a related object of the
invention to remotely detect the position of the rotor
without involving operation of the power circuit of the
control system for the motor.
The foregoing and other objects are realized by a
detection circuit that includes a resonant tank circuit
whose inductive (L) element is one of the phase windings
of the motor. A generator injects a low-energy signal of
a frequency F1 into an input of the tank circuit and the
electrical characteristics of the output signal are sensed
and processed in order to determine the mechanical angle
of the rotor.
As the rotor rotates, the effective inductance of a
phase winding varies over time between minimum and maximum
values. because the resistive (R) and capacitive (C)
elements of the tank circuit are fixed values, the .
resonant frequency Fo of the tank circuit changes in time
in a manner that is proportional to
1 /,//~ ( t ) ,
where L(t) is the variable inductance of the phase winding
incorporated into the tank circuit. When tire difference
39-421/naf
CA 02060625 2000-09-07
64159-1229
between the frequency F'1 of the injected signal and the resonant
frequency Fo are at a minimum, the amplitude of the output of
the tank circuit is at a maximum and 'the phase angle between
the injected signal and the output of the tank circuit is at a
minimum. In the first illustrated embodiment, the value of the
resistive (R) element is selected to provide a relative high
quality factor (~!) for the tank circuit so that the maximum
amplitude can be detected. In the se~~ond embodiment, the value
of the resistive (R) e7_ement is selected to provide a
relatively lower Q for the tank circuit so that the minimum
phase angle can be more' easily detected.
In the illustrated embodiments, each phase winding
incorporates a pair of stator windings in a conventional
configuration, wherein each phase energizes diametrically
opposite stator poles. It will be appreciated, however, that
the invention can be applied to virtually all types of
configurations of' brushless commutated motors. In this regard,
the tank circuit may incorporate an entire phase winding as
illustrated or a portion of the phase winding such as one or
more of the individual stator coils comprising the phase
winding.
In accordance: with the present invention, there is
provided for a brushless commutated motor having a plurality of
poles on a rotor and a plurality of phase windings on a stator,
a system for controlling a switching frequency FS of the power
signal applied to each phase winding, the system comprising: at
least one tank circuit comprising capacitive, resistive and
inductive elements, wherein one of the phase windings of the
motor is the inductive element; a switch in series connection
with the phase winding and in parallel connection with the
capacitive and resisti~;re elements of the tank circuit, the
switch being responsive to a drive signal for providing the
power signal to t:he phase winding at a switching frequency FS;
_g_
CA 02060625 2000-09-07
64159-1229
means for injecting into an input of the tank circuit a low-
energy signal having a frequency F1 that is substantially
greater than the switching frequency FS of the power signal; a
detector responsive to an output of the tank circuit for
monitoring the low-energy signal and detecting an event
resulting from a change in the value of the inductance of the
phase winding caused b;r a change in the relative position of
the stator and rotor and generating a signal indicative
thereof; and a motor controller responsive to the signal from
the detector for adjusting the timing of the drive signal in
order to maintain a predetermined relationship between the
signal from the detector and the power signal.
In accordancE~ there with the present invention, there
is further provided a circuit for sensing the position of the
poles of a rotor for a brushless commutated motor relative to
the position of t:he po:Les of a stator for the motor, wherein
the stator has a plura:Lity of phase windings, the circuit
comprising in combination: at least one tank circuit
incorporating onE: of the phase windings and having a resonant
frequency Fo that cyclically varies over a band of frequencies
in response to cyclical changes in the effective value of the
inductance of thEa one winding between maximum and minimum
values caused by the poles of the rotor changing position with
respect to the one phase winding; means for injecting into an
2.5 input of the tank circuit a low-energy signal having a
frequency F1; and. a dec:tector responsive to an output of the
tank circuit for detecting when the difference between the
resonant frequency Fo and the frequen~~y F1 of the injected low-
energy signal is at a minimum and generating a signal in
..0 response thereto that is indicative of the position of the
rotor.
-8a-
CA 02060625 2000-09-07
64159-1229
In accordance' with the present invention, there is
further provided a system for controlling a switching frequency
Fs of a power signal to each of the phase windings of the
brushless commuta.ted motor, the system comprising the circuit
of claim 19, and a switch in series connection with each of the
windings responsive to a drive signal for providing the power
signal to each of the phase windings at the switching frequency
Fs; and a motor controller responsive to the signal from the
detector for gene~ratinc~ the drive signal to the phase winding
incorporated into the tank circuit in order to maintain a
predetermined delay between the drive signal and the signal
from the detector.
Other c>bjects and advantages will become apparent
upon reference to the i=ollowing detailed description when taken
in conjunction with the drawings.
-8b-
r
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAHINGB
FIGURE 1 is a schematic diagram of an SR motor
illustrating a single phase of the motor energized by a
conventional control system;
FIGS. 2a-2c are each schematic diagrams of a SR motor
illustrating a discrete position of a rotor of the motor
as it rotates about an axis in response to energization of
different phases such as the illustrated phase A;
FIG. 3 is an exemplary and idealized graph
illustrating a cyclic variation of inductance L
experienced by the phase A winding of FIGS. 2a-2c relative
to the mechanical angles ~1, ~2 and 63 of the rotor;
FIG. 4 is an exemplary graph of a current waveform
for phase A in FIGS. 2(a)-2(c) relative to the time t of
mechanical rotation of the rotor, illustrating how the
commutation of phase A typically leads the mechanical
rotation of the rotor when the motor is controlled to
provide continuous rotation;
FIG. 5 is a~ block diagram of a circuit in accordance
with a first embodiment of the invention for controlling a
brushless commutated motor, wherein the relative position
of the rotor is determined by a sensor processing circuit
that responds to a low-level signal injected into a tank
circuit incorporating the phase windings of the motor;
FIG. 6 is a detailed circuit diagram of the sensor
processing circuit of FIG. 5;
-g-
39-42I/naf
... ,~r;~.,J
FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram of the motor control
generally shown in FIG. 5;
FIG. 8 is a timing diagram comprising a series of
waveforms S1-SS for various signals within the sensor
processing circuit and motor control circuit illustrated
' in FIGS. 6 and 7;
FIG. 9 is a diagram of a subcircuit of the motor
control circuit shown in FIG. 7 that limits the power
delivered to the windings of the SR motor;
FTG. 10 is another diagram of a subcircuit of the
control circuit in FIG. 7 that ensures the electrical
phenomenon detected by the sensor processing circuit
maintains a known relationship with the mechanical angle
of the rotor for varying speed conditions;
FIGS. ila-llb are idealized waveform diagrams
illustrating in accordance with a second embodiment of the
invention alternative phase relationships between a law
level signal injected into the windings of one phase and
an output signal from a tank circuit incorporating the
windings and responsive to the injected signal;
FIG. 12 is an exemplary impedance phasor diagram
illustrating the effects on the phase relationship between
the injected signal and the output from the tank circuit
resulting from changes in the reactance of the tank
circuit, assuming several different starting conditions;
-10-
39-421/naf
~~' 1 ~-''~ f,. ~r-.~ f'°
~e~ .m ~..7~ .a,r~
FIG. 13 is an exemplary and idealized timing diagram
similar to the graph of FTG. 3, illustrating the ,
relationship between the (a) cyclic variation of
inductance L experienced by the phase A winding of FIGS.
2a-2c, (b) the phase shift of the injected signal and (c)
the firing of the phase windings A-D;
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a circuit in accordance
with a second embodiment of the invention for controlling
a brushless commutated motor, wherein the relative
position of the rotor is determined by a phase crossover
detector that responds to a low level signal injected into
a tank circuit incorporating the windings of a single
phase of the motor;
FIG. 15 is a detailed block diagram of the detection -
circuit employed in the circuit of FIG. 14 for detecting
phase crossover;
FIG. 16 is a detailed circuit diagram of a lag
detector incorporated into the circuit of FIG. 15;
FIG. 17 is .a detailed circuit diagram of a phase '
crossover detector incorporated into the circuit of FIG.
15;
FIG. 18 is a detailed circuit diagram of a delay
circuit incorporated into the circuit of FIG. 15;
FIG. 19 is a detailed circuit diagram of a noise
suppression circuit incorporated into the circuit of FIG.
15;
-11-
39-421/naf
~!
v
J V N.Y n ~-r
I
FIGS. 20a-2ob are exemplary diagrams of the output
signals from the tank circuit and the phase crossover
circuit of the circuit of FIG. 15; and
FIG. 21 is an idealized and exemplary graph of the
delay function employed by the delay circuit in order to
insert a time delay between the detection signals provided
by the detection circuit and the signals used to fire the
phases of the motor.
E~hile the control system of the invention will be
described in connection with first arid second embodiments,
there is no intent to limit the invention to such
embodiments. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all
alternatives, modifications and equivalents included
within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by
the appended claims. Furthermore, although the control
system and detection circuit of the invention are
described in connection with a SR motor, those skilled in
the art of motor controls will appreciate that it can be
applied to any electronically commutated motor.
DBTl~I~$D D88CRIPT~0~1 OF THE OD~M~1IT
Turning to the drawings and referring first to FIGURE
1, a typical three-phase, prior art switched reluctance
(SR) motor 15 is characterized by a rotor 17 without
windings, permanent magnets or a commutator. A stator 19
is characterized by a relatively small number of copper
-12-
39-421/naf
2C'~~'~,'~~
phase windings (only one pair of series connected coils A1
and A2 is shown for phase A) and with very short end
windings 23.
The rotor 17 which rotates about a steel shaft 2.~ is
simply a stack of laminations comprising a magnetically
permeable steel alloy. As suggested by FIGURE 1, each
rotor lamination is cut to form a number of salient poles
that extend radially outwardly from the axis of rotor
rotation and are circumferentially evenly spaced about the
periphery of the rotor 17.
As with the rotor 17, the stator 19 is preferably '
formed by a stack of laminations made from a magnetically
permeable steel alloy. In order to cause rotation of the
rotor 17 as explained hereafter, the stator includes a
number of salient poles 27 which is unequal to the number
of salient poles 31 on the rotor 17. The stator poles 27
extend radially inward from an annular yoke 29 and are
circumferentiall.y and evenly spaced about the yoke.
The SR motor of FIGURE 1 has eight stator poles 27
and six rotor poles 31. Coils on diametrically opposite
stator poles 27 are connected in series to form phase
windings -- four in this case (A, B, C and D). For ease
of illustration, coil pairs B, C and D are not shown in
FIGURE 1; instead, the stator poles associated with these
phase windings are labeled "B'°, "C" and "D" accordingly.
As those familiar with SR motors will appreciate,
_13_
39-421/naf
~~''~~ ~S
different combinations of the numbers of stator and rotor
poles may be used -- for example, a six stator pole and
four rotor pole combination will give a three-phase
machine with a nominal 30° angle of rotor rotation for
each commutated phase. The eight stator pole and six
rotor pole motor shown in FIGURE 1 has a step angle of
15°. For identification of particular stator poles 27,
reference hereinafter will be made to the stator pole and
its coil -- e.g., in FIGURE 1 the stator poles of phase A
are 27 (A1) and 27 (A2), where A1 and Aa comprise the coil
pair for the phase A winding.
The excitation of coils A1 and A2 of the phase A
winding magnetizes both the stator 19 and the rotor 17.
As illustrated, this excitation produces a torque causing
the rotor 17 to align its poles 31 with the excited stator
poles 27 (A1) and 27 (A2). The polarity of the torque does
not depend on the polarity of the current since the rotor
17 is always attracted to the stator 19 and will rotate to
an orientation that provides a minimum reluctance path
between energized poles. Consequently, the SR motor
requires only unipolar current through the phase windings
and from a drive generally indicated as 33 in FIGURE 1.
Sequential excitation of the phase windings A, E, C and D
provides a "one-phase-on°' operation that causes the rotor
17 to rotate and synchronously align the poles 31 of the
rotor with those excited on the stator 19. In a
-14-
39-421/naf
conventional manner, a shaft position sensor 35 provides
to the drive 33 the rotor position information necessary
for synchronization of the rotor rotation and phase
excitation.
Torque in the SR motor is gropartional to the rate of
increase of flux carried by the rotor and stator poles 31
and 27, respectively, as they rotate into alignment. Both
air-gap reluctance and pole reluctance simultaneously '
decrease as the rotor 17 rotates into a position that is
radially aligned with the energized stator poles 27 (A1)
and 27 (A2). It is known that magnetic saturation in the
air gap region 37 and pole tips 38 of the switched
reluctance motor can significantly enhance the torque
output. In this regard, the desire for pole tip
saturation to increase output torque dictates a radial
length of an air gap 37 as small as possible for
reasonable manufacturing ease.
Referring to the drive 33 for the SR motor shown in
FIGURE 1, only the basic electrical circuit used to drive
the phase A coils A1 and A2 of the SR motor is illustrated.
It will be appreciated that the drive 33 includes similar
electrical circuitry fox phases B, C and D. For the phase
A winding, when the switch pair 39 of the drive 33 is
closed, current builds up in the coils A1 and A2 under the
excitatian of direct voltage from a power source 43. When
the switch pair 39 is opened, the current transfers to the
_1~_
39-421/naf
f ~ .°T C
diodes 45 and 47, and the coils A1 and A2 see the reverse
voltage which thereby quickly removes and recovers the
energy stored in the winding. This excitation is applied
to each of the phase windings A, E, C and D in sequence
and, for motoring operation, each pulse causes the most
adjacent rotor pole to move towards alignment with the
energized stator pole.
Referring to FIGS. 2a-2c, as indicated by the arrow
49, the rotor 17 steps around in the opposite direction to
the sequence of stator pole excitations as is well known
in the art. FIGS. 2a-2c illustrate the rotor 17 of the
motor 15 in FIGURE 1 rotating through a '°stroke angle°°,
which is the mechanical angle of rotation between points
of low inductance for a reference winding. In FIGS. 2a-
2c, the reference coil is A1 of the phase A winding. It
will be appreciated by those familiar with the operation
of electronically commutated motors that the coil A2 of
the phase A winding experiences a stroke angle
(consecutive points of low inductance) in synchronism with
coil Al. Furthermore, it will also be appreciated by
those familiar with electronically commutated motors that
each pair of coils in a phase winding experiences
synchronized stroke angles. Using the arrow 49 as a
reference vector that rotates with the rotor 17, the angle
of the rotor can be expressed as an angle ~ with respect
to a polar coordinate system mapped onto the stator as
-15-
39-421/naf
J
illustrated in FIGS. 2a-2c, where the origin is the axis
of rotation for the rotor 17 and the positioning of the
0/360° mark is arbitrary. Sometime during each stroke
angle for any pair of poles of a given phase, the
associated windings will be energized in order to generate
a motoring torque at the rotor 17. For example, in FIGS.
2a-2c the coils A1 and A2 will be energized sometime after
the angle ~1 in FIG. 2a and commutated sometime before the
angle ~2 in FIG. 2b. The stroke angle of the motor in
FIGS. 2a-2c is 60°. For an eight stator, six rotor pole
arrangement as shown in FIG~tE 1, one complete revolution
of the rotor requires six stroke angles of the phase
sequence A, B, C and 17.
It should be noted that thinking in terms of "steps'°
of rotor rotation as suggested by FIGS. 2a-2c is only
helpful from the viewpoint of understanding the rotation
of the rotor 17. In practice, current pulses to the
windings are controlled by the controller 51 in response
to the rotor position sensor 35 to occur at specific
angles ~ of the rotor. The commutation of the current is
controlled to occur at specific rotor angles a in order to
give a smooth rotational transition of a rotor pole 31
past an attracting stator pole 27 in order to ensure
continuous rotation without cogging. This generally means
that a phase winding is substantially de-energized before
the stator and rotor poles 27 and 31 align.
-17-
39-421/naf
~'~:, IE: ~!.' ~'D t" I
lGe~ ..v.,.y,:";J
Briefly turning to a more detailed discussion of
motor operation, motoring torque in a SR motor is produced
when a phase winding is energized during the time interval
when the inductance of the phase is increasing (i.e., a
rotor pole is approaching a stator pole of the phase). As
previously indicated, a given phase winding undergoes a
cyclic variation of inductance as rotation occurs. Making
the simplistic assumption that the inductance L of a
winding is independent of the current through the winding,
this variation is shown in FIG. 3 for the coil A1 in FIGS.
2a-2c. A first rotor pole is misaligned with the stator
pole at a rotor angle of el (FIG. 2a). With continued
rotor rotation, the alignment of a rotor pole occurs at 82
(FIG. 2b). As can be seen the inductance L of the coil
(and thus the winding) is the greatest when a rotor pole
is aligned with the stator pole.
For continuous rotation of the SR moor, the timing
of a typical energizing current pulse applied to a winding
relative to the time of rotor angle 91 is shown in FIG. 4.
Energy is controllably supplied during the period up to
the commutation time T1, by the opening and closing of the
switch pair 39 (see FIGURE 1) -- i.e., pulse-width
modulation. To ensure motoring operation with no more
than acceptable ripple torque, the commutation time T1
occurs at a time before the mechanical angle ~2 is
reached; that is, the phase winding is commutated before
-18-
39-421/naf
r
stator and rotor poles 27 and 31 align. Also, by
commutating during a time of rising inductance L, a
maximum amount of energy may be converted to motoring and
a minimum to generating. In other words, during
excitation of a phase by a current I, some of the energy
is converted to mechanical output, some is stored in the
magnetic field and some is lost in the copper or iron.
During the period after commutation, the continued
rotation of the rotor 17 partly returns the energy to the
supply and partly converts it to further mechanical output
and losses.
With opposing stator poles 27 (A1) and 27 (AZ)
associated with the phase A winding as is shown in FIGURF
1, the coils A1 and A2 are wound about the poles so that
one pole face 27a has a north polarity and the other has a
south polarity. With this canfiguration, the flux path
is, as indicated by the solid lines 51, through the rotor
17 and around the back iron 29 of the stator 19. Upon
energization of stator poles 27 (B1) and 27 (BZ) by the
phase B winding, the associated coils (not shown) will set
up a flux pattern similar to that developed by windings A1
and A2 of phase A. The flux patterns for the stator poles
27 (Ci) and 27 (C2) of phase C and 27 (DI) and 27 (D2) are
similar.
In the illustrated embodiment of the invention shown
in FIG. 5, an interface 53 includes a control system for
-19-
39-421/naf
~
, ~,~~-wx r.
the SR motor 15 of FIGURE 1 and 2a-2c. The interface 53
receives information from and delivers information to a
system controller(not shown), which coordinates the
control of the motor 15 with other functions executed by
the system. In its simplest form, the system controller
is a human operator and the bus interface 53 comprises
panel switches.
The bus interface 53 is of conventional construction
and provides speed, direction and torque commands to a
motor control circuit 55 as they are received from the
system controller over a system bus 57. Actual speed and
torque values of the motor 15 are derived by the motor
control circuit 55 and fed back to the system controller
via the bus 57.
Current for driving the coils of each phase winding
is derived from a power source V+. Each pair of phase
coils A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C~ and Ca or D1 and D2 is in a
series connection with one of the switches Tia-Tld, which
are preferably power MOSFETs as illustrated. A drive
signal from the motor control circuit 55 is applied to the
gate of each switch Tla-Tid by way of resistors Ria-Rid.
Each drive signal turns one of the switches
Tia-Tld on and off at a switching frequency F~. By
closing one of the switches Tla-Tld, a current is caused
to flow through the respective power circuit comprising
-20-
39-421/naf
r ~~f~F.a~.t"'
~ ~ ., ~, .a;;~ ~
the series connected pair of coils, the switch and one of
the resistors R2a-R2d.
In a conventional fashion, each of the resistors R2
function to sense the current through the power circuit
and provide an indication of the magnitude of the current
to the motor control circuit 55 by way of lines 59. As is
well known in the art of motor controls, the motor control
circuit 55 responds to the signals on the lines 59 by
pulse-width modulating (PWM) the signal delivered to the
gates of the switches Tia-Tld in order to maintain the
current at a level that achieves the desired torque.
In accordance with one important aspect of the
invention, in order to resolve the position of the rotor
17, a low-power signal of a frequency F1 is injected into
a tank circuit that includes a phase winding of the SR
motor. An output of the tank circuit is processed and
analyzed for the purpose of synchronizing the operation of
the switches T1 with the position of the rotor 17 relative
to the poles of the stator. The tank circuit comprises
inductive (L), resistive (R) and capacitive (C) elements.
The inductive element (L) is one of the phase windings of
the SR motor. As explained in connection with FIG. 3, the
value of the inductance of the phase windings is dependent
on the angle of the rotor. The values of the resistive
(R) and capacitive (C) elements are constants and,
therefore, the tank circuit's characteristic responses to
_21-
39-421/naf
fe ~~s ~' ~~ P ~ s? r
.. i...i.-x.,:71
i
1
the injected low-power signal are dependent on the
position of the rotor.
A detection circuit is responsive to the output of
the tank circuit for detecting a predetermined event
resulting from relative changes in one of the
characteristic responses of the tank circuit. Because the
detection circuit detects a relative change, the absolute
value of the inductive element (L) of the tank circuit
need not be known. Because of the nature of the detected
event, however, the absolute value of the inductive element
(L) must be within a range of values. Therefore, the
control system incorporating the detection circuit of the
invention can be applied to related motors without
adjustment of the values for the resistive (R) and
capacitive (C) elements, but motors of substantially
independent designs will likely require independent
determinations of the values for the resistive (R) and
capacitive (C) elements.
In the first illustrated embodiment of the invention
(FIGS. 5-10), a tank circuit is associated with each of
the power circuits. In the second illustrated embodiment
(FIGS. 11-19), only one tank circuit is employed in
connection with one of the power circuits. In bath
embodiments, however, the tank circuit incorporates both
stator coils that define the winding for a single phase.
As used herein, the term °°phase winding°° is
intended to
-22-
39-421/naf
rl '%~'~~~a~pt~'
~.i ~.. .e to ...7 ~'=. a,~
include all of the stator coils driven by a phase or any
portion of these coils. Fox example, the '°phase winding°'
incorporated into the tank circuit may be all of the coils
driven by a phase or it may be one of two coils driven by
a phase.
The resistive (R) and capacitive (C) elements of each
tank circuit are in parallel with one of the switches Tla-
Tld; whereas, each pair of phase windings is in series
with one of the switches Tla-Tld, and they are also in
series with the resistive (R) and capacitive (C) elements
of one of the tank circuits. This arrangement results in
the operation of the tank circuits not interfering with
the functioning of the power circuits. Moreo~rer, the
frequency F1 of the infected signal is much greater than
any switching frequency F~ of the motor and, therefore,
they substantially operate in separate frequency domains,
which serve to further isolate the functioning of the
power circuits from the functioning of the tank circuits
and the associated detectors. More specifically, the
range of switching frequencies F$ includes zero at the low
end (a static condition) to a maximum that is typically
dependent on design characteristics of the motor itself.
In the motor illustrated in FIGS. 2a-2c and 5, there
are eight (S) stator poles and six (6) rotor poles. Far
one complete revolution of the rotor, each phase must be
energized six times. For a high speed of 30,000
-23-
39-421/naf
~~:~ ~E~~r
.. .j,:...:D
revolutions per minute, each phase is commutated 180,000
times per minute or a frequency F9 of 3000 Hz. By way of
contrast, the frequency F1 of the injected signal is
preferably in the range of 20,000 to 100,000 Hz.
In the first embodiment of the invention illustrated
in FIG. 5, the values of the capacitive (C) and resistive
(R) elements are selected to tune the tank circuit to have
a resonant envelope that includes the frequency F1 for at
least some value of the resonant frequency FO as it varies
in time with the inductance L of the phase winding in the
tank circuit. In this regard, the resonant frequency Fo
for the series connected tank circuit of the invention can
be expressed as
_ 1
?. n LC
where L is the dynamic value of the inductance of the
phase winding and C is the static value of the capacitive
element. As the inductance L of the phase winding varies
between minimum and maximum values in response to rotation
of the rotor 17 as indicated in FIG. 3, the resonant
frequency Fo varies between maximum and minimum values.
When the difference between the resonant frequency FO
and the frequency F1 is at a minimum, a detection circuit
detects a maximum amplitude of the output signal from the
tank circuit, which is at the frequency F1. In order for
_2~_
39-421/naf
i~ ~~' ~'~ '~, ~'~ e-
~. a ..y,.,y J
the maximum amplitude of the output from the tank circuit
to occur at the mechanical angle 91 -- i.e., the poles of
the rotor are misaligned with the two diametrically
opposite stator poles 27 of the phase winding, the
injected frequency F1 must be greater than or equal to the
maximum value of the resonant frequency Fo. Preferably,
the frequency F1 is greater than the resonant frequency Fo,
but within the resonant envelope as defined by the maximum
resonant frequency so as to ensure the output of the tank
circuit experiences a detectable increase in amplitude.
In the first embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5, each
of the detection circuits for the tank circuits comprises
a sensor processing circuit 61a-61d that detects the
resonant amplitude of the frequency F1 and provides an
indication of the timing of the detection to the motor
control circuit 55. This indication of the timing of the
resonance is used by the motor control circuit 55 to
control the timing and commutation of the drive signals to
the swritches Tla-Tld.
Each pair of phase windings A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C1
and Ca and Dl and D2 is incorporated into a tank circuit
59a-59d as illustrated in FIG. 5. The output of each tank
circuit 59a-59d is applied to a respective sensor
processing circuit 61a-61d when the associated one of the
enabling switches 69a-69d is closed. The parallel outputs
from the sensor processing circuits 61a-61d axe applied to
-25-
39-421/naf
an OR gate 63, which supplies the four outputs in a serial
fashion to an input of the motor control circuit 55. Haw
the motor control circuit responds to the signals from the
detection circuits will be discussed in greater detail in
connection with FIG. 8.
In order to generate the injected signal F1, a source
generator 65 is either capacitively coupled to each of the
drive circuits by way of capacitors 67a-67d.
Alternatively, the signal F1 may be injected by way of a
transformer coupling at node 70 in FIG. 5. Applicants
prefer capacitive coupling of the generator 65 since
transformer coupling requires placement of a secondary
winding in the power circuit, which may introduce
undesirable losses into the system. Furthermore,
capacitive coupling may be used to inject the signal into
a node in each of the power circuits connecting the pair
of phase windings and the associated one of the switches
Tla-Tid as illustrated. The generator 65 is of a
conventional configuration and the capacitive coupling is
accomplished simply by adding a capacitor between the
generator and the power circuit so as to decouple the
output of the generator 65 from the DC voltage of the
power source V+. Both the transformer and capacitive
coupling methods work well but for the reasons listed
above, the capacitive coupling is the preferred method.
-26-
39-421/naf
16s~ ~r''~,~~'°x r"
~ ...~r ~-~. a.~
Sometime during each stroke angle of the rotor 17,
the difference between the injected frequency F1 and the
resonant frequency Fo can be expected to reach a minimum
and, therefore, the output of the tank circuit associated
with the reference phase winding can be expected to reach
a maximum amplitude as the resonant frequency Fo shifts in
value in response to the changing inductance of the phase
windings. As discussed in greater detail in connection
with the second embodiment, the minimum difference between
the injected and resonant frequencies F1 and F~,
respectively, can also be expected to provide a minimum
phase difference between the injected signal and the
output of the tank circuit.
The "event" of a maximum amplitude/minimum phase
shift at the output of the tank circuit can be expected to
occur during a certain portion of each stroke angle. This
maximum amplitude/minimum phase shift occurs before the
optimum turn on time of the respective motor phase. Thus,
the motor speed and saturation/load effects are minimal
since the phase winding has only mutual magnetic flux
(from the other phase windings) when it is part of the
active tank circuit. The predictability of the timing of
the maximum amplitude/minimum phase shift event within a
stroke angle allows each of the switches 69a-69d
associated with one of the detection circuits to
selectively enable the tank circuit for anly a portion of
-27-
39-421/naf
J 1! ..i~ ~~J,~
the time period of a stroke angle. By enabling the tank
circuit only when necessary to detect the maximum
amplitude of. the output signal, any power dissipation
caused by the resistive element (R) of the tank circuit is
minimized. Furthermore, the selective enablement of the
tank circuit also aids in establishing good noise immunity
properties for the control system.
Also, sometime during each stroke angle referenced to
a phase winding, the output of the associated one of the
sensor processing circuits 61a-61d is reset for detecting
the next event. The enabling signals to the switches 69a-
69d and the reset signals to the sensor processing
circuits are provided by the motor control circuit as
explained hereinafter in connection with FTG. 8.
The bus interface 53 accepts digital signals from the
system controller bus 57. The interface 53 decodes the
digital instructions from the bus to provide the direction
command (forwarcl/reverse), torque and speed magnitude
commands for the motor control 55. The motor control 55
provides torque and speed feedback signals which the bus
interface 53 encodes and makes available to the system
controller bus 57.
Referring to FIGS. 5 and 6 for the first embodiment,
each of the sensor processing circuits 61a-61d is
comprised of an absolute value circuit 72 composed of
amplifiers 73 and 75, a comparator 77 and a binary state
-28-
39-421/naf
.. ,.i ...r ~~, tJ
memory 71. Because each of the sensor processing circuits
61a-61d are identified, only 61a associated with phase A
is illustrated in detail herein. The absolute value
circuit 72 tracks the absolute value of the amplitude of
the envelope of the frequency F1 appearing at the output
of the tank circuit and also maintains an average value of
that absolute value.
With the switch 69a closed, the output of the tank
circuit is shorted to ground as indicated in FIG. 6. The
switch 69a may be a conventional transistor whose base is
driven by the "ENABLE A" signal from the motor control
circuit 55. With the '°ENABLE A'° signal active, the output
of the tank circuit is released from ground by the switch
69a. As indicated in FIG. 6, the output of the tank
circuit is taken at the node between the series connected
capacitive (C) and resistive (R) elements, which are
capacitor 79 and resistor 81, respectively. ~.
The operational amplifiers 73 and 75 in their
absolute value circuit configuration function to full-wave
rectify the signal S1 at the output 83 of the tank
circuit, which is at the injection frequency F1. In this
regard, the output of tank circuit is shown as waveform S1
in FIG. 8 for 1~ stroke angle. The switch 69a is enabled
during the time period in a stroke angle that the phase
windings of phases C and D are energized. Therefore, the
signal S1 at the output 83 is pinned at a reference ground
-2g-
39-421/naf
~~''~ ~/'aTt"'
.e w .,'y ~-r.~
f,or the first half of the stroke angle (i.e., the firing
of phases A and B, assuming the stroke angle for phase A
is the firing sequence A, B, C and D). Because of the
geometry of the motor 15 in FIGURE 1, and the illustrated
one-phase-on control scheme, a pole of the rotor can be
expected to misalign with a pole of the stator (FIG. 2a)
sometime during the firing of phases C or D. Therefore,
the "ENABLE A" signal is active during the firing of
phases C and D so that the output 83 is free to
communicate the signal S1 to the operational amplifier 73
of the sensor processing circuit.
The signal S1 is full-wave rectified by the absolute
value circuit 72 to provide a signal S2 illustrated in
FIG. 8 as waveform S2, which is the amplitude envelope of
the waveform signal Si. A moving average value of the
signal Sz is provided by an RC circuit 84 comprising a
resistor 85 and a capacitor 87. The moving average of the
signal Sz is illustrated by the waveform S3 in FIG. 8. The
two signals of i,raveforms S2 and S3 are provided to the
inputs of the comparator 77 comprising an operational
amplifier 78, which generates an output signal of waveform
S4 that is a bi-state signal. The state of the signal S~
is dependent on whether the instantaneous amplitude of the
output from the tank circuit (waveform S2) is less or
greater than the average amplitude of the output (waveform
S3). The signal S4 at the output of the comparator by the
-30-
39-421/naf
waveform S~, is a square wave as illustrated and the
rising edge of the square wave sets high the Q output of
the SR flip-flop 71. The Q output of the SR flip-flop 71
is illustrated by the waveform SS in FIG. 8. The Q output
of the SR flip-flop 71 is capacitively coupled to one of
the inputs of OR gate 63 by way of series capacitor 88 so
that the signal of the waveform S6 delivered to the OR
gate is a momentary pulse as illustrated.
Each of the sensor processing circuits 61a-61d
provides a signal to the OR gate 63 in FIG. 5 that is
similar to waveform S6 in FIG. 8. Because each sensor
processing circuit 61a-61d is responding to a different
tank circuit incorporating a unique pair of phase
windings, the ORed signals result in a stream of spaced
signals as indicated by waveform S~ that mark the timing
of the sequential alignment of rotor and stator poles.
The signals of waveform S~ are delivered to the phase
comparator A (PC'A) input of a phase locked loop (PLL) 91,
which is part of the motor control circuit illustrated in
FIG. 7. The PLL 91 may be a commercially available device
such as a Motorola MC14046B. The PLL 91 functions to
phase lock the signals of waveform S~ at the input PCA
with the signals at the input PCB. The signals at the
phase comparator B (PCB) input are derived from a feedback
network whose input is the output signals of the PLL 91.
-31-
39-421/naf
o",y~ v
The timing function provided by the waveform S~ may
be realised using only one or two of the sensor processing
circuits if the decreased accuracy and response time
degradation are acceptable. If less than all four of the
sensor processing circuits 61a-6~.d are used, the frequency
of the VGO output 5S of the PLL 91 is not used to directly
sequence the firing of phases A-D. Instead, an
appropriately frequency divided pulse train derived from
the PLLJVCO output is used. For example, if two sensor
processing circuits are used, the pulse frequency of
waveforms S.y and S8 would be half the frequency shown for
the four sensor circuit of FIG. 5. For such a case, the.
VCO output is divided by two by the counter and logic
circuit 99 before it is applied as an input to the
variable delay 93.
The feedback network in the circuit of FiG. 7
comprises a variable delay circuit 93 that receives the
output signals of the PLh 91 and a N,APdIS gate 95 whose two
inputs receive the output from the variable delay circuit
93 and the output from the PAL. The variable delay
circuit 93 effectively inserts a phase delay, identified
as 97 in waveforms S~ and S8, between the input signal of
the waveforms ST and the output signals of waveform S~ in
FIG. 8. The delay 97 is intended to ensure the phase
windings are fired and commutated at rotor angles that
ensure a continuous motoring operation rather than a
_3~_
39-421Jnaf
i~s~~ ~~i ~uJ
cogging rotation that is similar to the functioning of a
stepper motor.
As explained in greater detail in connection with
FIG. 10, the delay 97 inserted by the variable delay
circuit 93 is a fixed time up to a predetermined speed and
thereafter decreases. A fixed time delay will give a
linear relationship between motor speeds and "delay
angles." A delay angle is the angle ~ the rotor 17 turns
during a particular time delay period 93. At low speeds,
the angle delays are small and insignificant. At high
speeds, large angle delays occur. Applicants have found
that the fixed time delay for speeds up to 10,000 RPMs
provides adequate compensation for assuring a timing
relationship as illustrated in FIG. 3 between the
excitatian of a phase and the current buildup in the phase
windings. Above 10,008 RPMs, the delay 97 inserted by the
variable delay circuit 93 is adjusted in order to hold a
constant mechanical angle. The higher velocity of the
rotor simply requires an adjustment in that a phase
winding may have to be turned on sooner as the velocity of
rotor increases since the reaction time of the phase
winding to an energy pulse remains unchanged.
From the output of the PLL 91, the waveform Se is fed
to a clock (CIC) input of a conventional up/down counter
and logic circuit 99, having active output A, B, C and D
that are sequenced in response to consecutive pulses at
-33-
39-421/naf
ils~fiL:a~J
the clock input. Each output provides a gate drive to one
of the switches Tla-Tld, which is in series with one of
the pairs of phase windings A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C1 and C2
or D1 and D2. Specifically, output A drives the gate of
the switch Tla associated with phase windings A1 and A2,
output B drives the gate of the switch Tlb associated with
phase windings B1 and B2, etc.
The outputs A-D of the counter and logic circuit 99
can be sequenced to count up (i.e., the sequence A, B, C
and D) or count down (i.e., D, C, B and A). The direction
of the count will determine whether the pairs of phase
windings are sequenced in a clockwise or counterclockwise
direction, which determines the direction of rotation of
the rotor 17. A direction command to the UP/DOWN input of
the counter and logic 99 thus controls the direction of
rotor rotation. The direction command is derived from the
system controller in FIG. 5 by way of the bus interface
53.
Each of the base drive signals A, B, C and D from the
counter and logic 99 is waveshaped in one of the pulse-
width modulators (PWM) lOla-lOld. Because each of the PWM
101a-lOld is internally identical to the others, only the
structure of PWM lOla is illustrated in detail in FIG. 8.
It will be appreciated that the following description of
the PWM 101a applies equally well for each of the other
39-421/naf
-34-
a .~s'~f~ '.!~
' r i~ ~.s~~
PWM lOlb-lOld, except the inputs to them are different
combinations of the outputs from the counter 99.
In the PWN~ 101x, the output pulse A is applied to one
input of a AND gate 103. The other input to the AND gate
103 receives a signal from a limit circuit 105, which is a
pulse-width modulated signal respansive to speed and
torque characteristics of the motor 15. The AND gate 103
effectively impresses onto the output pulse A the pulse-
width modulation of the limit circuit 105. This pulse-
width modulated signal directly drives the gate of the
switch Tla associated with the phase windings A1 and A2.
An OR gate 10'~ receives the C and D outputs from the
counter and logic 99 and provides its output to the switch
69a, which enables the tank circuit during phase C and D
of a stroke angle. As can be seen by the waveforms S1-S$
of FIG. 8, for a motoring operation, the energization
sequence of the pairs of phase windings in advance with
respect to rotor angle such that phase pairs C1 and C2 or
Dl and D2 can be expected to be energised at the time of
rotor misalignment with the stator poles of the phase A
coils A1 and A2. The enable signal is similarly derived at
the other P4~I 101b-lOld for switches 69b-69d,
respectively. The output A of the counter and logic 99
directly provides the reset signal to the RS flip-flop 71.
In order to control the variable delay 93 and limit
circuits 105, a frequency-to-voltacJe converter 109
-35-
39-421/naf
t
~~'~ ~3 ~ ~ a
receives the output from OR gate 63. The frequency of the
signals comprising the waveform S~ is indicative of the
motor RPM. By converting this frequency to a voltage and
comparing the voltage to a reference voltage that
represents a command speed, a speed error or set signal
can be established. In the first illustrated embodiment,
the voltage from the frequency-to-voltage converter 109 is
delivered to a conventional buffer 111, which in turn
provides the voltage to an operational amplifier 113
configured as a gain amplifier by Way of a negative
feedback comprising a resistor 115. The voltage from the
buffer 111 is applied to the negative input of the
operational amplifier and a reference voltage 117
corresponding to the command speed is applied to the
positive input. The value of the voltage at the output of
the operational amplifier 113 is linearly dependent on the
difference between the reference voltage 117 and the
voltage from the buffer 111. Because the voltage from the
buffer 111 reflects the actual speed of the motor 15, it
is fed back to the system controller as a speed feedback
signal. Also, an operational amplifier 119 is configured
to sum the currents sensed by the resistors R2a-R2d (FIG.
5) and provide a torque feedback to the system controller.
The speed error signal from the operational amplifier
113 is received by each of the limit circuits 105 and the
voltage from the buffer 111, reflecting actual motor
39-421/naf
-36-
l
speed, is delivered to the variable delay circuit 93.
With respect to each of the limit circuits 105 (see FIG.
9), it comprises an operational amplifier 121 configured
with positive and negative feedback networks. Each of the
networks is comprised of a capacitance 123 or 125 and a "'
resistance 127 or 129 in parallel. These networks provide
a hysteresis effect where, once turned off, the amplifier
121 will not come back on until the drive current
decreases to a fraction (e. g., 80%) of the turn-on level.
The voltage at the positive input to the operational
amplifier 121 is the speed error signal from the
operational amplifier 113 in FIG. 7. The speed error
signal is a dynamic DC voltage, whereas the signal at the
negative input to the operational amplifier 121 is a
stream of pulses representive of the current pulses
generated in the drive circuit for the phase A winding.
When the coils of the phase A winding are energized,
the current through the phase winding builds as indicated
by the illustraiaon in FIG. 4. Tf the voltage from the
sensing resistor R2 becomes too great with respect to the
speed error or set voltage, the output of the operational
amplifier 121 goes low and the AND gate 103 (FIG. 7) is
disabled. The amplifier 121 remains low until the phase
current falls to the 80% level. As a result of disabling
the AND gate 103, the output A from the counter and logic
99 is cut off from the base of switch Tla. With the base
-37-
39-421/naf
~~''~ ~ ~"~S
drive removed, the switch Tia opens and the current
through phase A quickly falls. Correspondingly, the
voltage at the negative input of the operational amplifier
121 quickly falls to the 80% level and the output of the
operational amplifier returns to a high state, which
enables the AND gate 103 to pass the signal from output A
of the counter 99. This cycle of disabling and enabling
the AND gate 103 continues until the signal at output A
goes low. During the time output A is active, the value
of the speed set determines the duty cycle of the pulse-
width modulation derived from the limit circuits 105 since
a constant load is assumed for the illustrated embodiment.
The variable delay circuit 93 as illustrated in FIG.
l0 uses a variable duration monostable multivibrator or
one-shot 131. The one-shot 131 is implemented using a
Motorola MC14528 or similar device. Typically, an RC
network sets the timing of this device. In FIG. l0, the
one shot 131 has a timing capacitor 133 but the typical
resistor is replaced by a current source composed of a
pair of transistors 135 and 137 and supporting resistors.
The °'on" ti~ae of the one-shot 131 is proportional to the
value of the capacitor 133 and the amplitude of the
current through the transistors 135 and 137. This current
is in turn proportional to the current in a current mirrar
139, which is proportional to the speed signal from the
buffer 111 in FIG. 7. After the threshold of the current
-38-
39-421/naf
i ° ~r .r
mirror 139 is exceeded, the ~'on" time of the one shot 131
decreases as the motor speed increases.
A delay versus speed characteristic as shown in FIG.
20 is thus realized that has a constant time (increasing
angle) delay until the threshold of the current mirror is
reached and then a decreasing time (constant angle) delay
beyond the threshold. This delay, illustrated as 97 in
waveforms S~, and S8 of FIG. 8, is initialed by the VCO
output of the PLL 91. The signal S$ from the VCO output
trips the one-shot 131, but an AND gate 141 output remains
low until the Q output of the one-shot returns to high.
Thus, the leading edge of the VCO output (waveform Se) is
delayed by the duration of the "on°' time for the one-shot
131. Since the PLL 91 of FIG. 7 forces the leading edges
of its inputs (PCA and PCB) to be nearly coincident, the
feedback delay caused by the one shot 131 forces the VCO
output of the PLL 91 to lead the PCA input of the PLL 91
(waveform S~ of FIG. 8) by this same delay duration.
Turning to a second embodiment of the invention
illustrated in PIGS. 11-19, the values of the capacitive
(C) and resistive (R) elements are selected as in the
first embodiment to tune the tank circuit to have a
resonance Fn so that the injected frequency Fl is
preferably bracketed by the minimum and maximum values of
the resonant frequency as it varies in time with the
inductance (L) of the phase winding incorporated into the
-39-
39-421/naf
r
~. ~ ~;.~
tank circuit. Like the first embodiment, as the
inductance (L) of the phase winding varies between minimum
and maximum values in response to rotation of the rotor 17
as indicated in FIG. 3, the resonant frequency Fo varies
between maximum and minimum values. Unlike the first
embodiment, however, the second embodiment of the
invention is designed to be sensitive to changes in the
phase of injected frequency F1 caused by the tank circuit.
When the resonant frequency Fp is at a maximum, the phase
lead of the signal (FIG. 15) at the output of the tank
circuit is a maximum with respect to the signal Fy
injected into the tank circuit. When the resonant
frequency Fo is at a minimum, the phase lag of the signal
at the output of the tank circuit is a maximum with
respect to the injected signal F1.
When the resonant frequency Fo equals the frequency F1
of the injected signal, the output of the tank circuit is
in phase with the injected signal -- i.e., the phase shift
is zero. Becaueoe the second embodiment senses phase shift
instead of amplitude, the tank circuit may be tuned
differently. Specifically, the values of resistive
element (R) is picked in the first embodiment to provide a
high quality factor (Q). In the second embodiment,
however, the value of the resistive element is selected to
provide a relatively large phase shift for the purpose of
providing greater resolution of the position of the rotor
-40-
39-421/naf -
.:,, ~~?r,~~xr
J V rYn~7i~
17. Furthermore, in the first embodiment, the injected
signal is selected to have a frequency that is preferably
slightly greater than the maximum resonant frequency Fo,
whereas the frequency F1 of the injected signal in the
second embodiment is preferably within the band of
resonant frequencies Fo, as discussed more fully
hereinafter.
Referring to FIGS. ila-Iib, by correctly selecting
the values of the capacitive (C), inductive (L) and
resistive (R) elements of the tank circuit and the
frequency of the injected signal F1, the signal at the
output of the tank circuit will vary in phase angle ~ with
respect to the injected signal Fz. Tf the values of the
capacitive (C) and resistive (R) elements for the tank
circuit are chosen in proper proportions to the inductance
(L) of the motor winding incorporated into the tank
circuit, the frequency of the injected signal F1 can be
selected to provide either of the relationships
illustrated in FIGS. ila or 11b.
In the appr~ach shown in FIG. llb, the values of the
tank circuit and the injected signal F1 are chosen so that
the phase angle ~ c~f the output from the tank circuit
varies with respect to the injected signal between maximum
phase lag and maximum phase lead. In terms of the
resonant frequency Fp, the tank circuit is tuned to have a
_41..
39-421/naf
°
°. ~: !r1 f,. °.T r.~-e
~. J'V J..~~°wa
I
range of resonant frequencies that includes the frequency
F1 of the injected signal.
In FIG. 11a, the phase shift A~ varies between a
minimum and maximum phase lag. In terms of resonant
frequency Fo, the tank circuit is tuned to have a range of
resonant frequencies that does not include the frequency
F1 of the injected signal.
Detection of maximum phase leads and lags as
illustrated in FIG. lib is preferred over the detection of
minimum and maximum phase lags because the phase shift A~
is greater as indicated by a comparison of the shaded
areas in the two waveforms of FIGS. lia-llb. The larger
phase shift provides the best resolution of rotor
position.
It is important to note that the injected frequency,
F1 can be phase shifted itself to provide more phase lead
with respect to the output of the tank circuit. In FIG.
15, component 157a provides additional phase lead to the
injected signal.
The impedance phasor diagram of FIG. 12 illustrates
the sensitivity of the dynamic range of the phase angle ~
to both reactive Im[Z] and resistive Re[Z] portions of the
tank circuit, as well as to the injected frequency F1,
where the reactive portion Im[Z] equals,
-42-
39-421/naf
iC'o~;t~ 41~."~ r~
..,.o . y;~-, a,7
(wL - wC~
The impedance phasor diagram of FIG. 12 confirms that the
largest values of phase shift ~m occur between maximums of
leading and lagging phases. Therefore, it is desirable to
balance the reactance of the inductive element (L) with
the reactance of the capacitive element (C) in the tank
circuit in order to create a phase shift between phase
lead and phase lag. It also appears desirable to pick
smaller values for the resistive element (R) of the tank
circuit. Then, as the value of the inductance (L) of a
pair of phase windings varies, the resultant impedance
vector sweeps out an angle (phase shift) about the real
axis that has the greatest dynamic range shown -- e.g.,
~2 in FIG. 12.
The following listing defines the various parameters
illustrated in 1?IG. 12:
= radian frequency (2~rFx), where F1 is the injected
frequency;
I [Z] = imaginary portion of the impedance phasor;
and
Re [Z] = real portion of the impedance phasor, where
-43-
39-421/naf
Z = I[Z) + Re[Z] = impedance vector or phasor that
represents the magnitude and phase angle of the output
signal S1~ (see FIG. 15) of the tank circuit.
Each pair of impedance vectors or phasors in FIG. 12
define phase shift angles ~ as follows:
0ø~l = phase shift for tank circuit whose inductive
reactance is larger than its capacitive reactance (motor
resistance (Rm) only as resistive element);
Balanced inductive and capacitive reactance
(motor resistance only);
ScD3 = Larger capacitive reactance than inductive
(motor resistance only); and
6~4 = Balanced inductive and capacitive reactance
with resistive element (R) of tank circuit added to motor
resistance (Rm).
Like the first embodiment of the invention, the
second embodiment of the invention illustrated in FIG. 14
incorporates a detection circuit for the tank circuit,
which comprises a sensor processing circuit 110. Unlike
the first embodiment, however, the sensor processing unit
110 of the second embodiment detects the phase shift of
the signal Slp recovered from the tank circuit 111 and '
provides an indication of the timing of the detected phase
shift to a motor control circuit 113. This indication of
the timing of the phase shift is used by the motor control
-44-
39-421/naf
~~ ~~~'~~
.d t~Wss~
circuit 113 to control the timing and commutation of the
drive signals to the switches T1a-Tlc.
In keeping with the invention, one phase winding,
either coil pairs A1 and Aa, B1 and Bz, C~ and C2 or D1 and
D2, is incorporated into the tank circuit as illustrated
in the circuit of FIG. 14. The output of the tank circuit
111 is applied to the sensor processing circuit 110 by way
of a switch 114. Just as in the first embodiment, the
output from the sensor processing circuit 110 is applied
to an input of the motor control circuit 113. The motor
control circuit 113 is substantially the same as the motor
control circuit 55 of the first embodiment. Because only
a single tank circuit 111 and sensor processing circuit
110 are employed in this second embodiment, however, the
timing signal delivered to the motor control circuit 113
is one fourth the frequency of the signal delivered to the
motor control circuit 55 in FIG. 5, assuming the two
embodiments are associated with the same motor 15
operating at the: same RPM.
Like the first embodiment, a source 116 of the
injected signal S9 can be placed tp inject the signal into
various nodes of the control circuit. The important
object being that the injected signal Sg not interfere
with the power signals in the power circuits, yet still
drive a tank circuit incorporating one of the phase
windings. As explained in greater detail in connection
-45-
39-421/naf
Q
;~5~r' Tf°
i~'~ r,.~.~:..",a.
with FIG. 15, the source 116 injects the signal S9 by way
of capacitive coupling at node 118, or alternatively, by
way of transformer coupling at node 120 in FIG. 14.
Because their operation has already been discussed in
detail in connection with the first embodiment and FIG. 5,
the power circuits comprising the pairs of phase windings
A-D, the FETs Tla-Tld and the sensing resistors R2a-d will
not again be discussed in connection with FIG. 14 and the
second embodiment. The functioning of the motor control
circuit 113 with respect to the power circuits is
identical to that described in connection with the first
embodiment and, therefore, will also not be discussed
again in connection with the second embodiment. Likewise,
the bus interface 122 between the motor control circuit
113 and the system controller (not shown) is substantially
the same as described in connection with the first
embodiment and need not be described again in connection
with this second embodiment of the invention.
Because thE: detection circuit in the second
illustrated embodiment includes only one tank circuit and
one sensor processing circuit, the interface between the
detection circuit and the motor control circuit 113 is
somewhat simplified. However, because the second
embodiment senses phase shift of the injected signal S~ '
and not resonant amplitude as in the first embodiment, the
implementation of the switch 114 and sensor processing
-46-
39-421/naf
E- ~x r-
~°~'~:~:..r; yJ
circuit 110 in FIG. 14 are substantially different than
the implementation of the switches 69a-d and sensor
processing circuits 61a-d in the first embodiment of FIG.
5. Accordingly, the reset and enable signals provided to
the sensor processing circuit 110 and switch 114,
respectively, are also different than the reset and enable
signals provided by the motor control circuit 55 of the
first embodiment.
FIG. 15 illustrates the detailed structure of the
sensor processing circuit 110, the switch 114 and the
motar control circuit 113. The latter is illustrated in
detail only with respect to its interfacing with the
sensor processing circuit 110 and the switch 114 since, as
previously stated, the remainder of the motor control
circuit is essentially the same as the motor control
circuit 55, which is illustrated in detail in FIG. 7. For
examgle, the circuitry of the reference speed circuit 200
and the speed set circuit 201 are essentially the same as
set forth in corrnection with FIG. 7 of the first
embodiment.
Turning to FIG. 15, which illustrates the detailed
construction of the sensor processing circuit 110, the
switch 114 and their interfacing with the motor control
circuit 113, a PLL 117 of the motor control circuit 113
receives at its PCA input the output from the sensor
processing unit 110. Phase D is used to provide the PCB
_47_
39-421/naf
~~'~~~~a~~
~ v .,y,-.:a~
input to the PLL because D is also providing the firing
command for that phase which is desirable since, as FIG.
13 shows, when the inductance of phase A, the sensed
winding is at a minimum, the rotor pole is approximately
where you would want it to be to energize the D winding.
Thus, the phase "event" being detected is in advance of
this point -- i.e., sometime during the energizing of
phases B or C. While it is preferable to fire on a phase
subsequent to the measured phase, any order, so long as
the timing is carefully managed would be satisfactory.
Also, any one, or a multiplicity of phases can be sensed
to control the power firing.
It will be appreciated that in the second embodiment
only one timing signal from the sensor processing unit 110
is provided for every stroke angle or sequence of phase
firings A, B, C and D. In contrast to this approach, the
first embodiment of FIGS. 1-10 utilizes a sensor
processing unit for each phase of the motor 15, so a
timing signal is~ provided for the firing of each phase.
In the second embodiment, the frequency of the VCO output
of the PLL 117 must be a multiple of the timing signal at
the PCA input. In this regard, the frequency of the
timing signal is multiplied by the number of phases in the
motor 15 (four in the illustrated embodiment).
As in the first embodiment, in order to generate the
injected signal S9, a source generator 119 in FIG. 15 is
-48-
39-421/naf
capacitively coupled at node 118 in FIG. 14 or inductively
coupled at node 120 in FIG. 14. As in the first
embodiment, applicants prefer capacitive coupling since
transformer coupling requires placement of a secondary
winding in the power circuit, which may introduce
undesirable losses into the system. The generator 119 is
of a conventional configuration and the capacitor coupling
is accomplished simply by adding a capacitor 123 into the
power circuit so as to separate the output of the
generator 119 from the DC voltage of the power source V+.
An alternative approach, if only one phase is sensed, is
to use transformer coupling where the transformer is at
the bottom of the tank circuit instead of the top.
In the second embodiment illustrated in FIG. I5, the
sensor processing unit 110 incorporates a phase crossover
detector 125 in order to detect when the phase of the
injected signal, F1, is equal to that of the output of the
tank circuit. This point is called the minimum phase
difference point, or the phase crossover paint, and is
where the output of the tank circuit goes from lagging the
injected signal F1 to.leading it in phase. The values for
the capacitive and resistive elements (C) and (R) of the
tank circuit 111 are selected accordingly. Specifically,
for phase crossover to occur, the frequency F1 of the
injected signal must be within the range frequencies for
the resonant frequency F0. The sensor processing unit 110
-49-
39-421/naf
~"~''v'~~,r~:'~~,5
also includes a delay circuit 127 that inserts the delay
100 illustrated in waveform of FIG. 20.
Referring again to the schematic diagram of FIG. 15,
the PLL 117 functions to phase lock the signal from the
delay circuit 127 at the input PCA with the feedback
signal at the input PCB. The signals at the PCB input are
derived from a feedback network whose input is the D
output signal of a phase fire counter 167. Unlike the
first embodiment, no variable delay is inserted into the
feedback network. In this second embodiment, the variable
delay is provided by the delay circuit 127.
From the output of the PLL 117, the timing signal is
fed to a clock (CK) input of the phase fire counter 167,
which is a conventional up/down counter and logic circuit
like that of FIG. 7, having active outputs A, B, C and D
that are sequenced in response to consecutive pulses at
the clock input. Each output provides a gate drive to the
switch Tla-Tib associated with one of the pairs of phase
windings A1 and A2, B1 and B2, C1 and C2 and D1 and D2.
Specifically, output A drives the gate of the switch Tia
associated with phase windings A1 and A2, output B drives
the gate of the switch Tlb associated with phase windings
B1 and B2, etc.
Like the counter and logic circuit 99 of FIG. 7, the
phase fire counter 167 can be sequenced to count up (i.e.,
the sequence A, B, C and D) or count down (i.e., D, C, B
-50-
39-421/naf
~~.~vl.~;:~J
and A). The direction of the count will determine whether
the pairs of phase windings are sequenced in a clockwise
or counterclockwise direction, which determines the
direction of rotation of the rotor 17.
Each of the base drive signals A, B, C and D from the
phase fire counter 167 is waveshaped in the pulse-width
modulator (PWM) control 169. Because the PWM control 169
is internally identical to that illustrated in EIG. 7, it
will riot be discussed in detail in connection with this
second embodiment.
The ~~event~~ of a minimum phase difference (e. g.,
crossover in the illustrated embodiment) can be expected
to occur during a certain portion of each stroke angle.
The predictability of the timing of the minimum phase
difference event within a stroke angle allows the
detection circuit of the invention to selectively enable
the sensor processing circuit 110 for only a portion of
the time period of a stroke angle. By enabling the sensor
pracessing circuit 110 only when necessary to detect the
minimum phase shift of the output signal, good noise
immunity properties are established for the control
system. Also, sometime during each stroke angle the
output of the sensor processing circuit 110 is reset for
detecting the next event of minimum phase shift.
In order to selectively enable and reset the sensor
processing circuit 110, the switch 114 is inserted between
-51-
39-421/naf
-49-
39-421/naf
2~' ~';~ ~ ~;
the output of the tank circuit 111 and the input to the
phase crossover detector 125. As shown in FIG. 15, the
switch 114 comprises a noise suppression circuit 131, two
AND gates 133 and 135, a lag detector 137 and three
amplifiers REF, COMP1 and COMP2. As in the first
embodiment, the output of the tank circuit 111 is taken at
the node between the series connected capacitive (C) and
resistive elements (R), which are capacitor 139 and
resistor 141, respectively.
When phase A is being turned on, the noise
suppression circuit 131 disables the crossover detector
125 via the pair of AND gates 133 and 135. These AND
gates 133 and 135 also allow the comparators REF and COMP2
to provide phase event information to the crossover
detector 125. Therefore, the phase crossover detector 125
is disabled for the first 1/4 of the stroke angle as can
be seen in the illustration of FIG. 13 (i.e., the firing
of phase A, assuming the stroke angle for phase A is the
firing sequence A, B, C and D). Because of the geometry
of the motor 15 and the illustrated one-phase-on control
scheme, a pole of the rotor 17 can be expected to misalign
with a pale of the stator 19 (FIG. 2a) sometime during the
firing of phases B, C or D. Therefore, the crossover
detector 125 is enabled during the firing of phases B, C
and D as suggested by FIG. l3.so that the outputs of the
comparators COMP2 and REF are free to communicate their
-52-
39-421/naf
~~'~~~~~~r
.o v .~r;:.: J
outputs to the crossover detector of the sensor processing
circuit 110.
The comparator COMP2 °'squares up'° the output signal
of the tank circuit, whereas the comparator REF in FIG.
15 "squares up" the reference signal S1 from the generator
119. The comparator REF is coupled to the generator 119
by way of an RC network 157a-b. The capacitor 157a also
provides some phase lead to the injected signal. After
these signals have been gated by the output of the noise
suppression circuit 131, they enter the phase crossover
detector 125 at the data and clock inputs, respectively.
Referring to FIG. 17, the detector 125 changes state
at the Q2 output of flip flop 143 when the timing of the
zero-crossing of the signal F1 from the tank circuit first
precedes, coincides with and then follows the zero-
crossing of the reference signal F1 from the comparator
REF. This transition from a preceding to a following
zero-crossing is an "event" called "phase crossover" and
is uniquely related to a particular rotor/stator
mechanical alignment. Two flip flops 143 and 145 and OR
gates 146 and 148 are used in the detector of FIG. 17 to
help prevent spurious zero crossings from cancelling the
detection of a phase crossover registered at the output
Q2. Thus, the crossover event must occur for two
consecutive periods of the signal F1 to allow Q2 to
transition to its "crossover°° state.
_53_
39-421/naf
IG~~''~' ''lsl.'.r~t...
,.yr ~i~~:.J
When the Q2 output of the flip flop 143 of FIG. 17
transitions to "crossover" state, the delay circuit 127 of
FIG. 18 is preset and enabled to count, which results in
an eventual output pulse to the phase locked loop (PLL) in
FIG. 15. The OR gates allow the "phase D fired" signal
from the delay function to reset the crossover detector.
The delay 100 in FIG. 20b is intended to ensure the phase
windings are fired and commutated at rotor angles B that
ensure a continuous motoring operation rather than a
cogging rotation that is similar to the functioning of a
stepper motor.
As shown in FIG. 18, the delay circuit 127 consists
of a presettable digital counter 147, which is clocked by
the signal from the comparator REF. The length of the
count is presettable, and can be either a fixed value (no
frequency or load delay compensation) or dependent upon
frequency and/or load fluctuations.
FIG. 20a illustrates the output of the tank circuit
as the rotor 17 travels through approximately 100° of
angle 8. FIG. 20b shows the output of the Q2 output of
the flip-flop 143 of the crossover detector 125 as
illustrated in FIG. 17. The phase firing sequence below
FIG. 20b shows the sequence of events at the phases of the
motor 15.
When the outgut Q2 of flip flop 143 is low, the phase
of the signal from comparator COMP2 is leading the phase
-54-
39-421/naf
,~,r~~..yr
ito~~ ,. ~.. ~;-~ J
of the signal from comparator REF. Thus, the phase of the
tank circuit starts as a lagging phase, then crosses over
and leads and then crosses back over to a lag as suggested
by the two crossover points (dashed line) in FIGS. 20a-b.
The third dashed line in FIG. 2ob is when phase D is fired
after detection of the first phase crossover. The period
from crossover to the firing of phase D is a variable
delay 100, which can be a function of frequency and
possibly also load torque as discussed hereinafter more
fully. The delay 100 is provided by the delay circuit
127.
As explained in greater detail in connection with the
delay circuit 93 of FIG. 10 for the first embodiment, the
delay 100 inserted by the delay circuit 127 is a fixed
time up to a predetermined speed and thereafter decreases.
A fixed time delay 100 will give a linear relationship
between motor speeds and delay angles as indicated by the
exemplary graph in FIG. 21. At low speeds, the delay
angles are smal7l and insignificant. At high speeds, large
delay angles occur. Applicants have found that the fixed
delay 100 for speeds up to 10,000 RPI~s provides adequate
compensation for assuring a timing relationship as
illustrated in FIG. 3 between the excitation of a phase
and the current buildup in the phase windings. Above
10,000 RPNis, the delay 100 inserted by the variable delay
circuit 127 is adjusted in order to hold a constant
-55-
39-421/naf
.. t. ~;:... ~:3
l
f
mechanical angle as suggested by the graph in FIG. 21.
The higher velocity of the rotor 17 simply requires an
adjustment in that a phase winding may have to be turned
on sooner as the velocity of rotor increases since the
reaction time of the phase winding to an energy pulse
remains unchanged.
FIG. 18 shows one implementation of the delay circuit
127 where both frequency and torque inputs are digitized
via low resolution analog-to-digital (A/D) converters 149
and 151 that access a small (256 word) ROM 153, which
generates the preset inputs to the counter 147. To derive
the portion of the address to the ROM 152 used for
frequency compensation, the A/D converter 149 can be
implemented by a gated counter, which counts edges of the
injected frequency S9 for the interval between successive
signals to the phase fire counter 167. The resulting
count ranges from one to 26 (after pre-scaling) and is a
four-bit quantity. The torque compensation portion of the
ROM address bus 152 could be implemented by an integrator
across a shunt in the phase A leg of the motor winding
with a gated counter used to convert the motor current
into a four-bit digital quantity.
These two four-bit quantities are combined to
generate a unique address for the compensation ROM 153,
which holds 256 values of delay 100. One of these delay
values will be loaded into the presettable counter 147
_56-
39-421/naf
,~:~J
each time a phase crossover is detected. The presettable
counter 147 then counts until the preset number of clocks
(derived from the comparator REF) has occurred, at which
time it sends a signal to the PCA input of the PLL 117,
which results in a fire command to the phase fire counter
167.
Various other compensation approaches can be used
here. For example, torque compensation may not be
necessary for satisfying operation of the control system
as set forth in this second embodiment. Because
prototypes of the second embodiment have not as yet been
fully tested, applicants cannot say for certain whether
torque compensation is required using the phase shift
detection scheme of the second embodiment or if other
compensation schemes may be equally effective.
The purpose of the lag detector 137 in FIG. 15 is to
provide the system of the invention with a certain
threshold of phase margin that must be exceeded before the
phase detector :L25 is enabled. This provides a certain
amount of hysteresis in the detection scheme, and prevents
"PLL runaway" due to the rotor 17 lining up and stopping
very near to the crossover detection point and causing
oscillation of the control circuit, even though the motor
is not moving.
The output of comparator COMF1 is a phase-shifted
output, which is similar to the output of comparator REF,
-°57_
39-421/naf
~~~~~ ~.'~ i
but it is further leading in phase. FIG. 13 shows how the
lag detector 137 sees sufficient lag during the firing of
phase B to enable the phase detector via the AND gates 133
and 135 in FIG. 15. The output of the comparator COMP1 is
phase compared to the output of the comparator COMP2 to
determine when sufficient lag is present at the output of
the tank circuit. The phase of the signal S~ is phase
shifted by an RC network 155a-b coupling the generator 119
to the input of the comparator COMP1. The amount of phase
shift generated by the RC network 155a-b is selected to be
equivalent to the amount of lag required from the output
of the tank circuit prior to enabling the crossover
detector 125.
Turning to the detailed structure of the lag detector
137 illustrated in FIG. 16, when the phase of the output
of the tank circuit from the comparator COMP2 leads the
phase of the signal from comparator COMP1, a flip-flop 158
passes a high signal to the Q1 output of the flip-flop.
In turn, the hie~h signal from the Q1 output is passed to
the Q2 output of flip-flop 159, which enables the AND
gates 133 and 135 and, thereby, enables the phase
crossover detector 125. Flip-flop 159 synchronizes the Q1
output of flip-flop 158 to the frequency of the PLL 117.
The AND gate 160 ensures that only during phase B is the
lag detector 137 enabled to clock an output to Q2. In
effect, the lag detector 137 requires the presence of a
-58-
39-421/naf
~'x r~
minimum lag at the output of the tank circuit before the
phase crossover detector 125 is enabled, thereby ensuring
a certain measure of noise immunity for the control
system. Additional noise immunity is derived from the
noise suppression circuit 131.
The noise suppression circuit 131 acts to "blank" the
inputs to the phase crossover detector 125 when
"predictable'° noise occurs. FIG. 19 illustrates the
construction of the noise suppression circuit 131 and
shows that when the output of delay circuit 127 indicates
that a winding phase is to be turned ON, the flip flops
161, 163 and 165 disable the AND gates 133 and 135 for two
clock periods of the comparator REF. Other noise
suppression circuitry which has been proposed, includes
sharp band pass filtering of the tank circuit output and
tuning the band pass filter so that the resonant frequency
Fo is de-tuned after phase crossover has occurred.
From the foregoing description of the two illustrated
embodiments of the invention, it can be seen that the
output of the tank circuit provides a means for resolving
the position of the rator 17 without the need of an
intrusive sensor or electromechanical device such as an
optical encoder for tracking the position of the rotor.
No sensor attached to the motor itself is required. All
sensing is done through existing power leads. By
incorporating a phase winding of the motor 15 as the
-59--
39-421/naf
~rri4~
inductive (L) element of the tank circuit, the cyclical
variation of the value of the inductive element resulting
from the rotating rotor poles provides a cyclical
variation of the resonant frequency Fo of the tank circuit
between maximum and minimum values. The cyclical
variation of the resonant frequency Fo is related to the
mechanical angle a of rotor. In this regard, in an
idealized environment the phase winding of the tank
circuit experiences maximum inductance when stator poles
of the phase winding are aligned with poles of the rotor.
By contrast, when the phase winding of the tank circuit
experiences minimum inductance, the stator and rotor poles
are completely misaligned.
Because the cyclical variation of the resonant
frequency Fo can be associated with the mechanical angle a
of the rotor 17, detection of the changing electrical
characteristics of the output from the tank circuit can be
used to resolve the position of the rotor. In the
illustrated embodiments, the changes in amplitude or phase
of the output signal is detected and used to control the
firing angle of each phase. Delays between the sensing of
a mechanical angle (derived from the output characteris-
tics of the tank circuit) and the firing of a phase is
adjusted in order to compensate for motor speed and, if
necessary, motor torque.
-60-
39-421/naf
t ~ !'T C
s~~''~ ''~'.'.~'u,.~..7
From the illustrated embodiments, it will be appreci-
ated that many different detection schemes can be imple-
mented, depending on how the tank circuit is tuned with
respect to the injected signal F1. Two possible schemes
have been illustrated herein. The important feature of
any detection scheme is the incorporation of the cyclical
inductance of a phase winding into the tank circuit so
that the cyclical change of inductance can be detected
without interfering with the functioning of the power
circuit for that phase.
-61-
39-421/naf
