Language selection

Search

Patent 2064032 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2064032
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR HARDENING THE CUTTING EDGES OF SAWS, KNIVES AND CUTTING TOOLS
(54) French Title: METHODE DE DURCISSEMENT DES ARETES DE COUPE DE SCIES, DE COUTEAUX ET D'OUTILS COUPANTS
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C21D 9/18 (2006.01)
  • C21D 1/09 (2006.01)
  • C21D 9/22 (2006.01)
  • C21D 9/24 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SCHULER, ALBERT (Austria)
  • TOKMAKOV, WLADIMIR (Russian Federation)
(73) Owners :
  • SCHULER, ALBERT (Austria)
  • TOKMAKOV, WLADIMIR (Russian Federation)
(71) Applicants :
  • SCHULER, ALBERT (Austria)
  • TOKMAKOV, WLADIMIR (Russian Federation)
(74) Agent: SWABEY OGILVY RENAULT
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1990-07-18
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1991-02-07
Examination requested: 1993-07-12
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AT1990/000071
(87) International Publication Number: WO1991/001386
(85) National Entry: 1992-01-24

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
A 1796/89 Austria 1989-07-25
A 2451/89 Austria 1989-10-24

Abstracts

English Abstract



ABSTRACT

Process for hardening the cutting edges of saws, knives, cutting
tools and punching tools, particularly for working wood, paper,
paperboard, plastics, leather or textiles, by means of an energy
beam which is passed over the areas of the tool to be hardened.
Optimum hardening is achieved in that as the energy source, a
plasma beam is used, where the plasma beam (2) is guided at a
relative velocity (v) of 5 to 100 mm/sec with reference to the
cutting edge of the tool, and where the distance of the outlet
nozzle of the plasma torch (1) from the cutting edge lies between
2 and 14 mm, and where furthermore the power of the plasma beam
lies between 1 and 10 kW, and the diameter (d) of the outlet
nozzle of the plasma torch (1) is 3 to 7 mm.

Fig. 1

14


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS

1. Process for hardening the cutting edges of saws, knives,
cutting tools and punching tools, particularly for working
wood, paper, paperboard, plastics, leather or textiles, by
means of an energy beam which is passed over the areas of
the tool to be hardened, characterized by the fact that as
the energy source, a plasma beam is used, where the plasma
beam (2) is guided at a relative velocity (v) of 5 to
100 mm/sec with reference to the cutting edge of the tool,
and where the distance of the outlet nozzle of the plasma
torch (1) from the cutting edge lies between 2 and 14 mm,
and where furthermore the power of the plasma beam lies
between 1 and 10 kW, and the diameter (d) of the outlet
nozzle of the plasma torch (1) is 3 to 7 mm.

2. Process according to Claim 1, characterized by the fact that
the power of the plasma beam lies between 1 and 5 kw [sic].

3. Process according to one of Claims 1 or 2, characterized by
the fact that the diameter of the plasma beam (2) at the
outlet nozzle of the plasma torch lies between 4 and 6 mm.

4. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 3, characterized by
the fact that the distance (a) of the outlet nozzle of the
plasma torch (1) from the cutting edge is 3 to 10 mm.

5. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 4, characterized by
the Pact that the relative velocity (v) of the plasma beam
(2) with reference to the cutting edge is 15 to 50 mm/sec.

11


6. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 5, characterized by
the fact that the plasma beam (2) is guided perpendicular to
the saw blade (3) over the back (7) of the tooth, in the
area of the upper cutting edge, by mechanical movement of
the plasma torch (1).

7. Process according to Claim 6, characterized by the fact that
during the perpendicular movement of the plasma beam, the
saw stands still and that subsequently, the saw is
transported forward by one tooth division, whereupon the
next perpendicular movement of the plasma beam hardens the
following tooth tip (5).

8. Process according to Claims 1 to 5, characterized by the
fact that the plasma beam is directed at the center of the
tooth tip in hardening saws, and that the saw blade performs
a continuous or step by-step movement in the direction of
the toothing.

9. Process according to Claim 8, characterized by the fact that
the plasma beam operates in pulse operation, with a pulse
frequency f of f = forward velocity of the saw blade divided
by the distance between teeth, where the pulse duration lies
in the range of 0.2 to 0.8 seconds.

10. Process according to one of Claims 8 [sic], characterized by
the fact that the saw blade (3) performs continuous forward
movement in the direction of the toothing, while the plasma
beam (2) performs a perpendicular movement at a frequency
between 10 and 200 Hertz, brought about by an

12


electromagnetic deflection in the area between the cathode
tip and the bottom edge of the nozzle of the plasma torch.

11. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 5, characterized by
the fact that the axis of the plasma beam coincides with the
axis of symmetry of the cutting edge of a knife.

12. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 5, characterized by
the fact that the axis of the plasma beam encloses an angle
.alpha. with the axis of symmetry of the cutting edge of a knife,
which corresponds to about half the cutting edge angle .beta..

13. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 5, characterized by
the fact that the axis of the plasma beam encloses an angle
.alpha. of approximately 90° with the axis of symmetry of the
cutting edge of a knife.

14. Process according to one of Claims 1 to 5, characterized by
the fact that the axis of the plasma beam encloses an angle
.alpha. of approximately 135° with the axis of symmetry of the
cutting edge.

13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




~/27677


_ROCESS FOR HARDENING T~IE CUTTING EDGES OF SAWS KNIVES
CUTTING T LS AND PUNCI-IING TOOLS



The invention relates to a process for hardening the cutting
edges of saws, especially for working wood, as well as knives,
cutting tools and punching tools for working wood, paper,
paperboard, plastic, leather or textiles, by means of an energy
beam which is passed over the areas of the tool to be hardened.
Saws, knives or cutting tools and punching tools for the said
area of application demon6trate wear at the cutting edges. The
useful life of these tools depend~s Oil the quality of the cutting
edge (material used, hardening process), on the material cut and
on the cutting output. After the end of their useful life, these
tools are either reground or scrapped. Many types of saws,
knives, cutting tools and punching tools are made of carbon
steel, which can easily be hardened by heating and subsequent
rapid oolinyO But since such hardening is always connected with
a reduc~ion in strength, gre~t hardness is desired only in the
area oP the cutting edges. The other parts of a saw, a knife or
a cutting tool are supposed to demonstrate lesser hardness, but
greater strength.



Known methods ~or partial hardening of the cutting edges use
electron or laser beams as the energy source. The complicated

devices which are required Por carrying out such proc~s~es are a
disadvantage in hardening with electron beams or laser beams.
For this reason, such processes have been used hardly at all in
practical situations.




Another known hardening process is inductive hardening. After
grinding of the cutting edge, the cutting edge area is heated by
an eddy current, generated by a high-frQquency m~gnetic
alternating field, and hardened by rapid cooling.



Furthermore, it is known ~rom WO 83/00051 to carry out surface
hardening of flat areas by means of a plasma beam. ~lardening of
cutting edges by means of plasma beams was not taken into
consideration until now, however, because such plasma beams
demonstrate too little stability.



In saws, welding stellite onto the tooth tips is known. The
stellite material welded on is subsequently ground to the desired
pointed tooth shape. However, this process is very complicated.
It is the task of the present invention to indicate a process for
hardening the cutting edges of saw, knives, cutting tools and
punching tools in which an energy beam which is simple to produce
and cost-e~fective to operate is used.



According to the invention, it is therefore provided that as the
energy source, a plasma beam is used, where the plasma beam i5
guided at a relative velocity of 5 to 100 mm/sec with refer~nce
to the tool, and where the distance of the outlet no~zle of the
plasma torch from the cutting edge lies between ~ and 14 mm, and
where furthermore the power of the plasma beam lies between 1 and

lO kW, and the diameter o~ the outlet nozzle of the plasma torch
lies between 3 and 7 mm.



Surprisingly, it was found that with a precisely coordinate
constellation of parameters, it is certainly possible to use a
plasma beam for hardening the cutting edges of these tool[s],





where it is furthermore possible only at these parameters to
achieve hardening by self-quenching, in other words without
additional cooling, for example by air or water.



The heating and cooling speed is adapted to optimum values at
different material thicknesses and cutting edge angle~ with the
forward velocity v. For thinner blade thicknesses, especially
below 3 mm, i.e. for smaller cutting edge angles, especially
below 25, the ~orward velocity must be selected higher, since
otherwise the cooling rate is too small for sufficiently high
hardening, due to the limited heat conduction into the base
material. For greater blade thicknesses, i.e. cutting edge
angles, the forward velocity can be selected lower, to achieve
larger hardening zones.



Plasma beams are produced by ionization of argon or nitrogen, or
of mixed gases. Ionization takes place by electric arc discharge
or by excitation with a high-frequency electromagnetic field. By
means of a suitable formation of the electrodes or the nozzles, a
beam in which temperatures of up to 15,000 C are reached in the
axis is achieved.



If such a plasma beam is passed over the ground cutting edge of a
saw, a knife or a cutting tool at the parameters according to the
invention, a local area of the cutting edge heats up, at heating

rates of up to 5000 K/sec. After termination of the energy feed,
the cutting edge c0015 by self-quenching, i.e. by heat conduction
into the base material of the tool, at cooling speeds of up to
1000 K/sec. This results in a fine-grain martensite structure
with hardnesses up to 1000 HV (Vickers hardness).


J


However, it i5 critical in such processes that the cutting edge
is not allowed to melt during the heat treatment. Nevertheless,
sufEicient heating must be present in the area o~ the cutting
edge, in order to ensure the desired hardening. This is only
achieved at the parameter constellations indicated above.



Particularly good conditions for hardening result at the
following values:



Power of the plasma beam: 1 to 5 kW



Diameter of the beam at the outlet
nozzle of the plasma torch:4 to 5.5 mm



Distance of the outlet nozzle of the
plasma torch from the cutting edge: 3 to 9 mm



Relative velocity of the plasma beam
with reference to the cutting edge: 15 to 50 mm/sec




Preferably, a knife or cutting tool is guided through the plasma
beam by mechanical movement along the cutting edge, where the
axis of the plasma beam coincides with the axis of symmetry of
the cutting edge. In this manner, the most uniform possible heat
effect is achieved over the flanks of the cutting edge. In the
case of saws, the plasma beam is guided over the back of the
teeth, in the area of the upper cutting edge, by mechanical
movement of the plasma torch perpendicular to the saw blade. In
this manner, the most uniform possible heat effect is achieved
over khe entire length of the cutting edge of the tooth tip. For
cer-tain saw shapes, it is advantageous and simpler technically to






guide the plasma torch along the saw blade without perpendicular
movement. By electromagnetic deflection by means of a coil,
which is arranged in the area between the cathode and the bottom
edge of the nozzle, a defined broadening of the plasma beam and
thus an adaptation to the tooth geometry (e.g. for cross saws) is
possible. The difference from the known method of
electromagnetic deflection of the plasma beam for melt treatment
(hardfacing~ consists of the fact that there, the effect of the
electromagnetic field takes place in the area between the bottom
edge of the nozzle and the workpiece surface. In this method, a
cathode spot of the arc must be located on the workpiece surface.
This known method does not work in plasma hardening, since here,
the arc must burn between the cathode and the bottom edge of the
nozzle.



A reduction in the energy re~uirement in hardening can be
achieved in that the plasma beam functions in pulse operation, at
a pulse frequency f, with f = forward velocity of the saw blade
divided by the distance between teeth, wh~re the pulse duration
lies in the range from 0.2 to 0.8 sec.



For knives, it is furthermore possible that the axis of the
plasma beam covers a certain angle (e.g. goo, 135D or half of the
cutting edge angle) relative to the axis of symmetry of the
cutting edge. In this way, a distribution of the hardening zone
which is asymmetrical to the axis of symmetry, and thus, an
adaptation to special wear situations, can be achieved. For

knife blades with a thickness of more than 5 mm, in particular,
good adaptation of the hardening zone to various cutting edge
geometries is thereby possible.




In the following, the invention is explained in more detail on
the basis of the attached ~igure6:



Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of Wle basic arrangement
of the plasma system, using the example of saw hardening.



The plasma torch 1 generates a plasma beam 2 from the gas fed to
it, using an electric arc discharge, which beam exits at the
outlet nozzle of the pla~ma torch 1. The distance b~tween the
outlet nozzle and the cutting edge is a. The plasma bea~ is
directed at the -tooth top 5 of a saw tooth 4 and heats this area.
After termination of the energy effect, the heated area cools
rapidly and hardens. Subsequently, the saw blade 3 is moved
forward and the plasma beam 2 is direc~edl at the tooth top 5a oP
the following tooth 4a.



Figure 2 shows the area of the tooth tip of a saw blade in
detail, in an axonometric representationO The plasma beam 2 has
a diameter d and is moved ~ither along the cutting edge 6 or in
the direction of the toothing at a relative velocity v.



Figure 3 shows a schematic repreæentation of the basic
arrangement of the plasma system, using the example of knife

hardening. The plasma beam is directed at the cuttiny edge 9 of
the knife at an angle ~, and is moved along this edge at the
velocity v, where this edge is heated. After termination of the
energy efEect, the heated area cools rap~dly by self-quenching
and hardens.



Fiyure ~ shows a schematic representation of a cross-section
through the plasma torch in the area of the outlet nozzle. An




~ 3 .~3 ~J




electromagnet 10, arranged in the area between the cathode 8 and
the bottom edge 11 of the nozzle, causes widening of the plasma
beam 2 by high frequency deflection of the arc within the nozzle
area.



The following embodiments are intended to explain the use o~ the
process in more detail:



Example 1: Hardening of a reciprocating saw



Material: Band steel B412 (alloy steel with 0.8g% C, 0.3% Si,
0.3% Mn, 0.5% Cr; 0.4% Ni, 0.25% V), 45 teeth, distance between
teeth 30 mm,
Width b of the cutting edge: 3.5 mm,
Hardness in the untreated state 420 HV.



Plasma power (kW) ¦ 2.5 ¦3.5 ¦ 2.0
Beam diameter (d in mm~ ¦ 4.0 ¦ 4.0 ¦ 4.0
Distance (a in mm) ¦ 5.0 ¦6.0 ¦ 4.0
Forward velocity ¦ 25 ¦30 ¦ 20

(v in mm/sec)
Gas through-flow (l/min~ ¦ 7 ¦ 10 ¦ 7
I
Maximum hardness (HV) ¦ 920 ¦940 ¦ 900



Practical cutting tests in saw mills resulted in an increase ln
useful life by a factor of 5.


s~


Example 2: Hardening of a circular saw



Material: Saw steel B412, 50 teeth, distance between teeth
30 mm,
Width b of the cutting edge: 4.0 mm,
Hardness in the untreated state 410 HV.



Plasma power (kW) ¦ 3.0
Beam diameter (d in mm) ¦ 4.0
Distance ~a in mm) ¦ 5.0
Forward velocity ¦ 30
(v in mm/sec~
Gas through-flow (l/min) ¦ 8
.'
Maximum hardness (HV) ¦ 900



Example 3: Hardening of a band saw



Material: saw steel B412, band length 6 m, distance between

teeth 15 mm,

Width b of the cutting edge: 1.5 mm,


Hardness in the untreated state 410 HV.



Plasma power (kW) I 1.5

Beam diameter ~d in mm) ¦ 3.0

Distance (a in mm) ¦ 5.0

Forward velocity 1 20

(v in mm/sec)

Gas through-flow (l/min) ¦ 7



Maxlmum hardness (HV) ¦ 900


A ~ J`J


Example 4~ Hardening of a punch knife for leather and textiles:

Material~ Band steel CK60 (material No. 1.1221)
Thickness: 2 mm
Hardness in the untreated state: 300 HV (Vickers)

Plasma power (kW) 1 2 4
Beam diameter (d in mm) 4 4
Distance (a in mm) 4 6 8
Angle between plasma axis and
axis of cutting edge (degrees) 0 0 0
Forward velocity
(v in mm/sec~ 25 35 50
Gas through-flow (l/min) , 5 5 5

Maximum hardness (HV) 860 890 9~o

-3 ~ "~


Example 5: I~ardening of a planing kniEe for woodworking

Materlal: 80 CrV 2 (material No. 1.2235)
Thickness: 8 mm
Hardness in the untreated state: 280 ~IV (Vickers)

Plasma power (kW) 2 3 5
Beam diameter (d in mm) 4 4 4
Distance (a in mm) 4 6 8
Angle between plasma axis and
axis of cutting edge (degrees~ 60 90 120
Forward velocity
(v in mm/sec) 20 30 40
Gas through-flow (l/min) 5 5 6

Maximum hardness (HV~ 840 880 905





Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1990-07-18
(87) PCT Publication Date 1991-02-07
(85) National Entry 1992-01-24
Examination Requested 1993-07-12
Dead Application 2001-07-18

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2000-07-18 FAILURE TO PAY APPLICATION MAINTENANCE FEE
2000-09-11 FAILURE TO PAY FINAL FEE

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1992-01-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1992-07-20 $100.00 1992-07-20
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1993-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1993-07-19 $50.00 1993-09-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1994-07-18 $50.00 1994-06-27
Reinstatement: Failure to Pay Application Maintenance Fees $200.00 1995-07-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1995-07-18 $75.00 1995-07-27
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1996-07-18 $75.00 1996-07-10
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1997-07-18 $75.00 1997-07-17
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 1998-07-20 $75.00 1998-06-30
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 1999-07-19 $75.00 1999-07-16
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SCHULER, ALBERT
TOKMAKOV, WLADIMIR
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 1996-02-19 4 102
Description 1996-02-19 10 320
Claims 1996-02-19 3 102
Abstract 1996-02-19 1 22
Cover Page 1996-02-19 1 18
Description 2000-02-15 14 395
Claims 2000-02-15 8 247
Representative Drawing 2000-05-30 1 15
Correspondence 2000-03-09 1 91
International Preliminary Examination Report 1992-01-24 36 1,196
PCT Correspondence 1993-10-12 1 35
PCT Correspondence 1992-06-29 1 34
PCT Correspondence 1994-03-10 1 39
Prosecution Correspondence 1997-10-29 4 138
Prosecution Correspondence 1998-01-26 2 56
Prosecution Correspondence 1998-08-19 3 118
Prosecution Correspondence 2000-01-14 4 118
Prosecution Correspondence 1993-07-12 2 49
Examiner Requisition 1999-09-14 2 94
Examiner Requisition 1998-05-19 2 71
Examiner Requisition 1997-06-27 3 91
Office Letter 1993-08-19 1 27
Fees 1996-07-10 1 56
Fees 1995-07-27 1 46
Correspondence 1995-08-09 1 19
Correspondence 1995-08-24 1 23
Fees 1995-08-16 1 47
Fees 1994-06-27 1 65
Fees 1993-09-28 1 36
Fees 1992-07-20 1 36