Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
206~~~9
. :.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Percutaneous access to the peritoneal cavity
is necessary for uremic. patients who must undergo
peritoneal dialysis for treatment of acute or chronic
renal failure. Such an access permits' infusion of
dialysis solution into the peritoneal cavity and drainage
of dialysate-containing wastes that axe connected or
diffuse from uremic blood.
Typically a peritoneal catheter is implanted
through the abdominal wall. Catheter implantation
creates three segments: the intraperitoneal catheter
segment is the part of the oathetor located
intraperitoneally: the intramural catheter segment is the
part of the catheter contained within the abdominal wall:
and the external catheter segment is the part of the
catheter outside the skin exit.
The peritoneal catheter typically comprises a
catheter body or tubing plus the cuffs. The tubing is
2os~~z~
typically made of soft material such as silicone rubber
or polyurethane. A cuff is a band of fabric, affixed to
the intramural segment of the catheter body, for fibrous
tissue ingrowth to stabilize the catheter and to prevent
pericatheter bacterial penetration.
A peritoneal catheter tunnel is surgically
created during the implantation. The tunnel is a
passageway through the abdominal wall within which the
intramural segment of the peritoneal catheter is
contained. The tunnel has an internal and external exit.
The internal tunnel exit, or intraperitoneal tunnel
entrance, is the inlet of the tunnel into the peritoneal
cavity. The skin exit is the external exit or skin
outlet of the tunnel.
The cuff located close to the endoabdominal
fascia is called the epiperitoneal cuff, inner cuff,
internal cuff, or deep cuff. The cuff located closer to
the skin is called the subcutaneous cuff, outer cuff,
superficial cuff, or external cuff. A part of the tunnel
between the skin exit and the outer cuff is called the
sinus tract. The exit site is the most external part of
the sinus tract and the skin surrounding the skin exit.
Four major complications of the implantation
and use of peritoneal dialysis catheters include external
cuff extrusion, obstruction (which is usually a sequel
of catheter tip migration out of the true pelvis with
- 2 -
2~~~929
subsequent omental wrapping), skin exit or tunnel
(exit/tunnel) infection, and dialysate leaks.
Peritonitis, particularly a refractory one, may also be
related to peritoneal catheter design and care. These
complications result in technical difficulties,
morbidity, prolonged antibiotic therapy, catheter
failure, and sometimes the inability to continue
peritoneal dialysis. According to The National CAPD
Registry .Special Survey, in 1987, overall survival of the
most commonly used catheters ranged between l0 - 30
percent at 3 years.
The prior art disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,687,471 and 4,772,269 (Twardowski et al °471 and
Twardowski et al '269) addressed these problems and
solved them partially by use of '°swan neck" catheters:
1) exit/tunnel infection by a downwardly directed skin
exit, 2) pericatheter leaks by placement of the deep cuff
in the rectus muscle, 3) catheter tip migration by caudal
direction of the intraperitoneal segment, and 4) outer
cuff extrusion by a permanent bend between the cuffs.
U.S. patent 4,935,004 (Cruz '004) utilized similar
principles as applied in Twardowski '269 to reduce
complications. Results achieved with Gruz '004 are not
published yet.
Recently published results obtained with swan
neck catheters in four Central Missouri hospitals
- 3 -
~~i~~~29
confirmed theoretical expectations. An overall survival
of 64% at 36 months for swan neck catheters was
significantly better than that of 29% for "standard"
catheters (Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Khanna R, Nichols
WK, Nolph KD: Long term experience with Swan Neck
Missouri catheters. ASAIO Transactions 1990: 36: M491
M494.). "Standard" catheters were Tenckhoff (Tenckhoff
H, Schechter H: A bacteriologically safe peritoneal
access device. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern organs 1968;
14: 181-187.14: 181-187) and the Toronto Western Hospital
catheter (U. S. Patent 4,392,855).
In spite of this progress the results are still
not totally satisfactory, particularly in respect to exit
site infections. Although the probability of catheter
survival at 3 years (if all complications except of
exit/tunnel infections were censored) increased from
0.655 to 0.790, the results indicate that 21 percent of
implanted catheters cannot survive 3 years because of
exit/tunnel infection (Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Khanna
2p R, Nichols WK, Nolph KD: Long term experience with Swan
Neck Missouri catheters, ASAIO Transactions 1990: 36:M491
- M494.). Many exit infections, although not leading to
catheter removal, cause patient suffering, require
prolonged antibiotic therapy, and increase the cost of
treatment.
One of the important reasons for exit site
- 4
~~165~~2~
infection is trauma caused by catheter pulling or
tugging, pressure on the exit by a tight garment, and the
movement of the patient's abdominal wall transmitting
mechanical stress to the exit (Twardowski ZJ, Prowant
BF: Can new catheter design eliminate exit site and
tunnel infections? Perspectives in Peritoneal Dialysis.
1986; 4 (No. 2) : 5 - 9. ) . To prevent exit site infection,
good catheter protection from mechanical stress is
extremely important, especially during break-in: however,
all efforts to immobilize the catheter with use of
various devices have been only partially successful
because the abdominal wall is in constant motion. This
motion is transmitted to the catheter, causing a piston
like movement within the sinus tract, which traumatizes
the skin exit and sinus tract, and brings about bacterial
penetration deep into the sinus tract. Damage to the
epidermis and/or granulation tissue within the sinus
tract combined with the deep bacterial penetration
results in infection.
our extensive clinical and research experience
with catheter exit sites indicates that downwardly
directed exits of cuffed hemodialysis catheters implanted
into jugular and/or subclavian veins ara less prone fi~o
infection than those of peritoneal catheters (Twardowski
ZJ, prowant BF, Nolph KD, Khanna R, Schmidt LM: Culture
results of peritoneal catheter peri-exit smears (S) and
- 5 -
20~~~~~
sinus tract washouts (W). XIth International Congress
of Nephrology, Abstracts, Tokyo, Japan,July 15 - 20,
1990, p. 259 A: Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF, Nolph KD, .
IQianna R, Nichols WK, C.W. Caldwell CW, H. Taylor H, H.L.
Moore HL: Key factors in exit sites) (ES) evaluation.
XIth International Congress of Nephrology, Abstracts,
Tokyo, Japan, July 15 - 20, 1990, p. 26 A.). A salient
difference between exits of such hemodialysis catheters
and those of peritoneal catheters is their location: the
chest versus the abdomen. The chest is a very sturdy
structure, with minimal wall motions compared with the
abdominal wall. The catheter exit located on the chest
wall is thus subjected to movement only minimally,
therefore is less likely to become infected. Moreover,
a tight garment is usually not worn on the chest and
there is less pressure on the exit.
There is controversy as to whether the external
cuff is beneficial or detrimental for catheter survival.
Several authors showed exit site infections to be similar
with and without external cuff. Other authors noted that
infection became resistant to antibiotic treatment once
the tissue grown into the external cuff was infested.
They considered the outer cuff to be a detriment rather
than an asset for the peritoneal catheter. On the
contrary, we found a beneficial effect of the outer cuff,
provided that the cuff was located 1 - 2, cm from the exit
- 6 -
2~~~~2~
and cuff extrusion was prevented (Twardowski ZJ, Nolph
KD, Khanna R, Prowant BF, Ryan LP: The need for a "Swan
Neck" permanently bent, arcuate peritoneal dialysis
catheter. Perit Dial Bull 1985; 5: 219 - 223). Our
extensive study of the morphology of the catheter tunnel
suggests that the tissue ingrown into the cuff does not
constitute per se a critical barrier for spreading
infection (Twardowski ZJ, Dobbie JW, Moore HL, Nichols
WK, DeSpain JD, Anderson PC, Khanna R, Nolph KD, Loy TS:
Morphology of peritoneal dialysis catheter tunnels.
Accepted for publication to Perit. Dial. Int). This
observation suggests that the value of the external cuff
depends on anchoring .the catheter resulting in the
restriction of the piston-like movement. Consequently,
another anchoring structure, not a porous cuff, may
better prevent exit site infection.
In accordance with this invention, the above
disadvantages are reduced by the use of a modified
catheter.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a
peritoneal dialysis catheter has been developed which
comprises two flexible tubes which are typically
connected at the time of implantation. The peritoneal
-
~0~~~2~
dialysis catheter of this invention comprises a distal
tubular section as one of the flexible tubes, and a
proximal tubular section as the other. Nonintegral,
tubular connector means are provided, being positioned
to connect with respective ends of the proximal and
distal tubular sections in sealed flow relation.
Thus, the distal tubular section may be
surgically implanted into the peritoneal cavity, while
the proximal tubular section may be surgically implanted
into the chest of a patient with an end thereof
protruding from the chest. The respective ends of the
two sections may be connected to each other through the
tubular connector means as the tubular sections are
implanted or after such surgical implantation.
The catheter may be made of silicone rubber,
polyurethane or other flexible material. The implanted
distal section typically constitutes the intraperitoneal
catheter segment and part of the intramural segment. The
distal end of the distal section, located in the
peritoneal cavity, is preferably coiled and provided with
a central bore and multiple, small side perforations for
fluid delivery into and drainage from the peritoneal
cavity. The proximal end of the distal section
preferably carries a porous cuff, preferentially located
in the rectus muscle, to facilitate permanent ingrowth
of the tissue into it and anhoring of the catheter into
_ g _
20~~~~~
the abdominal wall.
The tubing of preferably the distal section may
be provided with an outwardly extending flange
circumferentially surrounding the tubing just below the
cuff. As in Twardowski '71, the flange may be slanted
at an angle of 30 degrees to 60 degrees, preferably about
45 degrees.
The proximal end of the distal section extends
no more ,than a few centimeters from the cuff, for
connection with the tubular connector means, which is
typically made of titanium, hard polytetrafluoroethylene
or equivalent material. The connector means is also to
be coupled with the distal part of the proximal part at
the time of implantation.
The proximal tubular section comprises the
remaining part of the intramural segment and the external
catheter segment. The distal end bore of the proximal
section communicates with the proximal end bore of the
distal section through the connector means. A distal
part of the proximal section typically extends
substantially straight to extend along the anterior chest
wall as implanted.
The proximal section typically carries two
spaced, porous cuffs, a superficial cuff and a middle or
central cuff. The section defines, in its natural,
unstressed condition, a permanently U-shaped, bent
_ g
~O~j' ~~
section between the cuffs. It is generally preferred for
the bent section to define an arc angle of about 180
degrees. Preferably, the substantially straight portion,
that is, the distal part of the proximal section, has a
length of about 6-35 cm. and preferably about 15-30 cm.
In another embodiment of the invention the
external, porous cuff is substituted by an anchoring
wing.
The peritoneal dialysis catheter of this
invention may preferably be implanted into the patient
by the following steps. Steps 1 and 2 below may be
performed in either order, or simultaneously:
(1) One implants the distal tubular
catheter section described above substantially
in the peritoneal cavity of the patient, with
a proximal end of the distal section pointing
toward the chest.
(2) One implants the proximal tubular
catheter section discussed above substantially
in the chest of the patient with the distal
end of the proximal section pointing toward
the proximal end of the distal section. Also,
one causes the proximal end of the proximal
section to protrude outwardly from the chest,
typically in a position extending downwardly.
3 ) One then ~ oins the proximal end of
- to -
~~~~v~N~
the distal section and the distal end of the
proximal section together in sealed flow
relation, after the distal and proximal
sections have been at least partially
implanted.
A significant advantage of the implantation
method of this invention lies in the fact that the
implantation can be performed from a central area of the
body, adj acent the final location of the connector means,
the proximal end of the distal section and the distal end
of the proximal section. The necessary tunnels are
formed in directions leading to the peritoneal cavity and
the chest. After the respective distal and proximal
tubular catheter sections have been implanted, and a
cuff, typically on the distal catheter section, has been
implanted preferably in the rectus muscle, a distal
portion of the proximal catheter section may be cut away
to cut the proximal section to the optimal length. Then
both catheter sections may be connected with a tubular
connector which, as previously described, may be made of
titanium, polytetrafluoroethylene or the like, to provide
a sealed flow connection between the two catheter
sections.
If desired, the connector tubing may have
serrations on the outside in a conventional manner to
provide a firm retention of the respective lengths of
- 11 -
~0~~~~9
catheter tubing which are connected to it.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a plan view of the catheter of this
invention in its natural, unstressed configuration as it
may preferably be implanted in the patient;
Fig. 1A is an enlarged view of the connection
between the proximal end of the distal part and the
distal end of the proximal part of the catheter;
Fig. 1B is an enlarged side view similar to
Fig. 1A but rotated 90' , showing the angled 'flange, bead,
and epiperitoneal cuff of the distal section of the
catheter;
Fig. 2 is an enlarged view of the proximal part
of the catheter of Fig. 1; and
Fig. 2A is an enlarged view of another
embodiment of the catheter of this invention showing the
catheter having a wing instead of subcutaneous porous
cuff.
- 12 -
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawings, peritoneal dialysis
catheter 10 is shown to be of the "swan neck" type as
described in the previously cited Twardowski et al
patents, with specific modifications as described herein.
Catheter 10 comprises a pair of flexible catheter tube
sections: distal catheter section 12 and proximal
catheter, section 14, which may b~ made of a desired
crosslinked elastomer such as silicone rubber, or
appropriate thermoplastic materials such as polyurethane.
Typically, the catheter material is relatively soft and
elastomeric.
Distal catheter section 12 and proximal section
14 are shown to be implanted in the body of a patient and
positioned to permit peritoneal dialysis to take place
on a long term, frequent basis, with the two catheter
sections being joined together by tubular connector 16,
which is preferably made of titanium and which firmly
fits in the bores of the tubular catheter sections 12,
14. Tf desired, connector tube 16 may carry a series of
serrationa or sharp-edged rings 17 of generally
conventional design to provide strong adherence and
bonding between the respective tubes and connector 16.
The distal end of distal catheter section 12
defines a spiral or coiled configuration 18 which
- 13 -
20~ a~~~
preferably lies in a single plane when the catheter is
:~n its natural, unstressed condition. The spiral section
defines a plurality of small perforations or apertures
20 for flow communication with the exterior. Also, the
distal end of catheter section 12 may itself be open for
added flow communication between the peritoneal cavity
and the bore of catheter 10.
Near to the proximal end 22 of distal catheter
section 12 a porous cuff 24 is provided, which cuff is
intended to be positioned in the rectus muscle of the
belly, to serve as a tissue ingrowth retention site.
Also, angled flange 26 may be carried adjacent
to and directly below cuff 24. Flange 26 is made of a
plastic material which can sutured to the posterior
sheath of the rectus muscle. Preferably, flange 26 is
at an angle of about 45 degrees as shown.
Resilient bead 28 is then provided below flange
26. Bead 28 may be made of an elastomer such as silicone
rubber, and is intended to be located in the peritoneal
cavity just beneath the peritoneal membrane. A purse
string suture may be applied to the groove between flange
26 and bead 28, to be tightened to prevent leakage from
the peritoneal cavity along the catheter.
As shown in Fig. IB, flange 26 and bead 28 are
angled, sloping upwardly. When sutured to the posterior
rectus sheath, flange 26 and bead 28 are thus angled
- 14 -
posteriorly and upwardly relative to the abdomen. such
a position of the flange and bead helps to maintain the
position of the intraperitoneal segment of the catheter
in a desired downward or caudal direction.
Proximal catheter section 14 defines, in its
natural, unstressed condition, a bent or U-shaped section
30 which preferably forms an arc angle of about 160-180
degrees. U-shaped section 30 is intended to be implanted
in the presternal area of the chest, and is integral with
two legs, 32, 34, defined by the remainder of proximal
catheter section 14. It should be noted that because
proximal catheter section 14 defines the U-shaped section
30 in a natural, unstressed condition, the implanted, U-
shaped section does not exert significant pressure on the
surrounding tissues after implantation due to any elastic
memory of the catheter urging the catheter to straighten
out, contrary to many catheters of the prior art. Thus,
the neighboring tissue is subjected to less stress with
the catheter of this invention.
' The distal leg 32 forms a generally straight
segment that extends to connector tube 16, preferably
having a length from the distal end of curved portion 30
to the distal end of segment 14 of about 20 cm. There,
it joins with connector 16 and distal catheter section
12 to provide a sealed flow path between the two catheter
sections. Thus, catheter 10 comprises two catheter
- 15 -
sections and a tubular connector which is not integral
with the respective catheter sections, although providing
a firm connection and seal.
After implantation, proximal leg 34 of catheter
segment 14 forms the intramural segment along with the
curved segment 30, and also defines the external segment
of catheter 10.
A pair of porous cuffs 36, 38 are also provided
at or adjacent both ends of curved, U-shaped section 30.
10' Considering cuff 24 as being the outer cuff, the inner
cuff 36 is intended to be positioned within the tissue
typically of the second, third, or fourth intercoastal
space on either side of the sternum. Cuff 38 serves as
the superficial cuff, and is intended to be positioned
within the coastal space on the opposite side of the
sternum from the central cuff, and positioned about 1 or
2 centimeters from the skin exit.
As previously stated, the two catheter sections
12, 14, may be separately emplaced in the patient,
following which a distal portion of proximal catheter
section may be cut away to cut the section to the
precisely desired length that turns out to be optimum for
the particular size of the patient, and also depending
on how the implantation of the two catheter sections has
gone. Then, the two catheter sections may be connected
together, being of the precisely desired length, by
- 16 -
2~lu~is~~~
connector 16.
Figure 2A shows an alternate embodiment of the
invention where a wing 40 or other structure made of
nonporous material is used as a substitute for outer cuff
g 38. The purpose of this structure is to anchor the
proximal end of the catheter, preventing piston-like
movements, but avoiding tissue ingrowth into the parous
structure. As mentioned above, many authors maintain
that infection of such a tissue is resistant to cure
without surgical "shaving off" of the cuff with the
tissue.
CATHETER IMPLANTATION TECHNIQUE
A preferred surgical technique of catheter
implantation used for "swan neck" catheters is generally
followed, with modifications related to the new design.
The intraperitoneal segment 18, epiperitoneal
cuff 24, flange 26, and bead 28 are implanted in a manner
identical to that of swan neck Missouri 2 or swan neck
Missouri 3 catheters (Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R, Nichols
WK, Nolph KD: Swan Neck peritoneal dialysis catheters -
design, insertion, break-in, and chronic care. Video,
Second Edition. Academic Support Center. The Curators
of the University of Missouri, 1988). As one exception,
the position of the cuff is intended to be preferentially
17
above the umbilicus. In brief, a 3-4 cm transverse
incision is made through the skin and the subcutaneous
tissue over the rectus muscle above the umbilicus. Then
an incision is made in the anterior rectus sheath, and
the rectus muscle fibers are dissected bluntly in the
direction of the fibers down to the posterior rectus
sheath. A purse string suture is placed through the
posterior rectus sheath, transversalis fascia, and the
peritoneum. A 5 mm incision reaching the peritoneal
cavity is made with a scalpel. The catheter is threaded
on a stiffening stylet and introduced deep into the true
pelvis. The bead 28 is introduced into the peritoneal
cavity, and the flange 26 is placed flat on the posterior
rectus sheath. The stylet is removed, and~then a 50 ml
syringe containing sterile saline is attached to the
catheter. Saline solution is injected into the
peritoneal cavity. If the solution flows freely, the
purse string suture is tightened, securing bead 28 in the
peritoneal cavity and the flange 26 on the posterior
rectus sheath. The flange 26 is sewn into the posterior
rectus sheath with four sutures at twelve, nine, six and
three o'clock. A small stab wound is made in the
anterior rectus sheath above the transverse incision.
The catheter is grasped with the hemostat and pulled
through the wound. The transverse incision in the
anterior rectus sheath is sawn.
- 18 -
~~~t~~?2~
The remainder of the implantation procedure is
mostly specific fox the new catheter design according to
the invention. A 3 - 4 cm incision is made over the
sternum at the level of the second, third, or fourth rib.
A superior subcutaneous pocket is made by blunt
dissection to accommodate the bent section of the
proximal tube of the catheter. Below the incision two
small pockets are made by blunt dissection to accommodate
middle cuff 36 and superficial cuff 38 or wing 40. A
trocar of the diameter of the tube is attached to the
distal leg 32 of catheter section 14, and a tunnel is
created to merge with the incision over the rectus
muscle. The proximal end of the distal section 12 and
the distal end of the proximal section 14 are trimmed to
a desired length, and the junction is made between them
through connector 16.
A 5 mm stab wound is made at the exit site on
the chest. A trocar is then attached to the proximal end
42 of proximal section 14, and directed through the exit
z0 site. The bent portion 30 of the catheter section 14 is
positioned carefully in the subcutaneous pocket. Car~
is taken to avoid catheter twisting. Finally, both akin
incisions are closed with absorbably subcuticular
sutures.
z5 Accordingly, the catheter of this invention may
be used as a permanent, indwelling peritoneal dialysis
- 19 -
~a~~~~r 3
catheter having greatly reduced problems with infection
and the like. Also, the catheter of this invention is
less subject to trauma caused by catheter pulling or
tugging, as well as pressure on the catheter exit site
by a tight garment and movement of body portions adjacent
the exit site. As can be seen, the catheter access site
resides in the chest even though it is a catheter for
peritoneal dialysis.
The specific procedures used for effecting
peritoneal dialysis through the indwelling catheter of
this invention are similar to those that are regularly
used in other conventional peritoneal dialysis
procedures.
The above has been offered for~illustrative
purposes only, and is not intended to limit the scope of
the invention of this application, which is as defined
in the claims below.
- 20 -
