Language selection

Search

Patent 2067727 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2067727
(54) English Title: COATING, AND A COATING METHOD, FOR A STEAM TURBINE AND ADJOINING STEEL SURFACES
(54) French Title: ENDUIT POUR TURBINE A VAPEUR ET SURFACES D'ACIER CONTIGUES, ET METHODE D'ENDUCTION CONNEXE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C23C 4/18 (2006.01)
  • F1D 5/28 (2006.01)
  • F1D 25/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TENKULA, JAAKKO (Finland)
  • HELLMAN, BJARNE (Finland)
  • MAJAVA, JORMA (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • TAMPELLA TELATEK OY
(71) Applicants :
  • TAMPELLA TELATEK OY (Finland)
(74) Agent: AVENTUM IP LAW LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1991-09-03
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-03-19
Examination requested: 1998-09-02
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/FI1991/000269
(87) International Publication Number: FI1991000269
(85) National Entry: 1992-04-21

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
904369 (Finland) 1990-09-04

Abstracts

English Abstract

2067727 9204480 PCTABS00011
The present invention relates to the protection of the casing,
division planes, piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a
steam turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by steam, the coating comprising a
coating layer produced by the thermal spraying of a steel, alloyed
amply with chromium and aluminum, which during the coating
process oxidizes strongly in the spray, whereby large amounts of
chromium and aluminum oxides are formed, which will remain inside the
coating, surrounded by a steel matrix, and after the coating
process there will form on the surface of the coating layer, under the
oxidizing action of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide
layer. Another object of the invention is a related coating method.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 92/04480 PCT/FI91/00269
Claims
1. A coating intended for protecting the casing, division
planes, piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a
steam turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by hot wet steam,
characterized in that the coating comprises a coating layer
which has been produced by thermally spraying a steel,
alloyed amply with chromium and aluminum, which oxidizes
strongly in the spray during the coating process, whereby
large amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed
which will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a
steel matrix, and after the coating process there will
form on the surface of the coating layer, under the oxi-
dizing effect of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide
film.
2. A coating according to Claim 1, characterized in that
the coating is a steel which contains chromium 20 - 45 % by
weight, aluminum 5 - 15 % by weight and molybdenum 0 - 5 %
by weight, preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by weight, aluminum
5 - 8 % by weight, and molybdenum 0 - 3 % by weight.
3. A coating according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in
that the coating is made up of one layer the thickness of
which is 0.3 - 2.5 mm.
4. A coating according to any of Claims 1-3, characterized
in that the thermal spraying is carried out by the arc,
plasma or supersonic method.
5. A method for coating the casing, division planes,
piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a steam
turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by hot wet steam,
characterized in that a coating material consisting of a
steel alloyed amply with chromium and aluminum is sprayed
thermally onto the surface to be coated, the coating
material oxidizing strongly in the spray during the coating

WO 92/04480 PCT/FI91/00269
process, whereby large amounts of chromium and aluminum
oxides are formed which will remain inside the coating,
surrounded by a steel matrix, and that after the coating
process the coating which has been formed will be exposed
to the oxidizing effect of air, whereupon a dense chromium
and aluminum oxide film will form on the surface of the
coating.
6. A method according to Claim 5, characterized in that
the coating material is a steel containing chromium 20 -
45 % by weight, aluminum 5 - 15 % by weight and molybdenum
0 - 5 % by weight, preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by weight,
aluminum 5 - 8 % by weight and molybdenum 0 - 3 % by weight.
7. A method according to Claim 5 or 6, characterized in
that a single-layer coating is formed the thickness of
which is 0.3 - 2.5 mm.
8. A method according to any of Claims 5-7, characterized
in that the thermal spraying is carried out by the arc,
plasma or supersonic method.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


~ W092/0~8~ 6 7 7 2 7 PCT/Flg~ 269
A coating, and a coating method, for a steam turbine and
adjoining steel surfaces
. ~
~-- 5 The invention relates to a coating intended for protecting
the interior surfaces of a steam turbine and the adjoining
pipes and superheaters, the coating preventing the erosive
and corrosive wear caused by steam. The invention also
relates to a method for coating the interior surfaces of a
steam turbine and the adjoining pipes and superheatersO
As stated in Swedish Patents/Patent Applications No. 762881
and 771073, steel surfaces exposed to hot, damp steam at
high pressures and velocities are subject to heavy erosive
and corrosive wear.
:, :
-' The damage caused by wear may lead to the need for fill-in
and repair weldings which are difficult to carry out! and
- even replacement of the turbine casing and pipes.
` 20
~- Such repair and replacement work causes long stoppages and
thereby large financial losses owing to reduced production.
This is the case in particular in large power plants such
as nuclear power plants.
For example the following coatings have been used for
protecting turbine pipes:
~! 1. Ceramic coating with a nickel-aluminum alloy in the ad-
- 30 hesive layer~ The thickness of the adhesive layer is 10 -
25 ,um and that of the ceramic coating 50 - 250 ~m.
2. Metallic so-called triple-layer coating, in which the
adhesive layer is a nickel-aluminum alloy (t = 50 - 100 ~m),
the intermediate layer is a chromium steel (approx. 13 ~ Cr,
; wlth a layer thickness of approx. 200 ,um), and the surface
layer is a stainless or acid-resistant steel (Cr = approx.
: '
: ., . .. , . . . .: . . . ~- ,, :
' . ' : ,: ' :, . : : .
.. , . : . , ,: . . . .
'~ ' . :. ' ' ' ' ' ,, ,' ' '~ .' ', : ' ' :
: . . :. . .
:'. . , ~ . :
; ' ,' ' ', `' : ' ; ' : ' '

W092/0~80 ~ I ` O ~ 7 7 2 ~ PCT/FI91/002~
18 ~, Ni = 5 - 8 %, and Mn = approx. 8 %, with a layer
thickness of approx. 200 ~m).
Ceramic coatings have, for example, the following disadvan~
tages:
.~ I '.
~i - poor shock resistance, for example, when foreign bodies
`~ enter the turbine or the pipes, they may break the coating;
- the thermal expansion coefficient of a ceramic coati~g
is very low compared with that of carbon steel, so that
great or rapid variations in the temperature may lead to
the cracking of the coating. A crack in the coating may, -
in turn, lead to rapid local damage to the base material;
- ceramic coatings are good insulators. The coating of
a turbine casing with a ceramic material could disturb
intra-turbine thermal conduction and cause unexpected
deformation during operation;
with a ceramic coating it is difficult to coat seal
surfaces which are to be machined. The coating may have a
hardness higher than 1000 HV, and therefore it is difficult
to machine, and, furthermore, the coating tends to crack;
- it is difficult to achieve a sufficient layer thickness
- with a ceramic coating if the coating is to be used for
filling cavities.
. '~' ,; ' ' .
So-called triple-layer coating has functioned satisfactorily
in pipe systems. However, this coating has the following
disadvantages: !
- in a triple-layer coating, each interface between the
different coatings constitutes a strong barrier to thermal
conduction, and so problems similar to those involved with
ceramic coatings may appear in thermal conduction in the
turbine casing;
:
, .
~ "
i~

~ W092/0~80 ~ 2 0 ~ 7 7 2 7 P~ 9~/00269
- if it is necessary to fill cavities in coating surfaces
- which are to be machined, there is the risk that the
: machined surface will run through different layers;
- if the triple-layer coating is damaged in operation, ~:
for example owing to strong local erosion, it must be
, , .
~ repaired by first removing the old coating entirely and by
then recoating the surface, layer by layer.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide
a coating which can be used for coating the casing, division
. planes, piping, superheaters and other parts of a steam `
: turbine so that reliable and long-term protection, suitable :;~
~ for the conditions involved, is obtained for the steel
:. 15 surfaces. It is a further object of the invention that the ::
. coating work can be carried out on the site rapidly and
:~: economically, and that the coating is also well suited for
~ the coating of surfaces which are to be machined. :`
.
The coating according to the invention is characteri~ed in
that the coating comprises a coating layer which has been
produced by the thermal spraying of a steel alloyed amply
with chromium and aluminum, whic:h, during the coating
process, oxidizes strongly in the spray, whereby large
-~ 25 amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed which
~ will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a steel
: matrix, and on the surface of the coating layer there will
form, after the coating process, under the oxidizing effect
of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide film.
: 30
The coating me~hod acsording to the invention is
characterized in that a coating material of steel alloyed
. ' amply with chromium and aluminum is sprayed thermally onto : -
the surface being coated, and this coating material oxidizes
strongly in the spray during the coating process, whereby
large amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed
which will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a :
. steel matrix, and that, after the coating process, the
,
.~
,';
.: , . ., .: ' .
' ' ' . ','' ., ,' '

W092/~80 ~ 2 0 6 7 7 2 7 PC~/FI91/002 ~
coating which has been formed will be exposed to the
oxidizing effect of air, whereby a dense chromium and
aluminum oxide film will be formed on the surface of the
coating.
/ 5
According to the invention, the coating material used is a
steel preferably containing chromium 20 - 45 ~ by weight,
aluminum 5 - 15 ~ by weight and molybdenum 0 5 ~ by
weight, and especially preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by
weight, aluminum 5 - 8 ~ by weight and molybdenum 0 - 3
~- by weight. The coating material may be thread-like or
pulverous~
: ' . .
In the coating according to the invention, containing large
amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides, the contents of
chromium, aluminum and molybdenum are of the order presented
;~ above.
: .
The chromium and aluminum oxide film in the coating accord-
ing to the invention, formed under the effect of oxidation
after the coating process, is strong and dense, and will
- prevent erosive and corrosive wear caused by wet steam.
: . .
The coating according to the invention can be prepared by
; 25 thermal spraying, by using flame, arc, plasma and/or
supersonic spraying, but primarily arc, plasma and/or
supersonic spraying, in order to obtain good adhesion of
the coating to the base material.
Thus there is formed in the coating according to the
invention a layer with good adhesion to the base material,
a steel coating which contains a large amount of oxides,
~ and a surface layer which consists of a dense oxide film.
.. .
In order that no galvanic corrosion should occur on the
interface between the base material and the coating, the
thickness o~ the coating should be at minimum 0.3 mm,
preferably, however, 0.5 mm. The thickness of the coating
. ",~

~ wog~/o~o ` ' ' ; 2 0 6 77 2 7 PCT/Fi91/00~69
may be up to 2.5 mm without its pealing off because of
internal shrinkage of the coating.
The advantages of the coating according to the invent1on as
compared with previous ones are as follows:
.' " ~':
l. The very dense chromium and aluminum oxide film formed
~` on the surface of the coating provides excellent protection
against corrosion and erosion. Nevertheless, the coating is
: lO very tough.
~ If the coated surface is damaged, for example under the
- effect of a foreign body which has entered the turbine;
the oxides inside the coating will prevent propagation of
. ~ .
the damage.
" ' .
Thus the coating provides the protective effect of a ceramic
coating, but it has the toughness and strength of a metal
coating.
2. The adhesion of the coating to the base material is
very good. When arc or plasma spraying is used, an adhesion
strength greater than 60 N/mm is obtained, which is
` approximately double the adhesion str~ngth of a flame-
sprayed nickel and aluminum alloy.
: :-
Good adhesion guarantees that the coating will not become
detached by minor impacts, and that it will also be possible
to coat narrow edges. Furthermore, good adhesion enables
the surace to be machined.
3. The thermal expansion coefficient of the coating is
close to the thermal expansion coefficient of carbon steel,
so that deormation due to thermal shock and thermal
expansion will not damage the coating. -
. . .
4. Since the coating is made up of one single layer and
~i it can be sprayed approx. 2 mm thick, the coating is
, . .
': ' ' . ' ; , ,' ~,,: ' ' ~

~ W092/0~80 `'~ ``; 2 0 6 7 7 2 7 PCT/~9~
suitable for protecting very large seal surfaces which are
to be machined.
;
5. Although the coating contains large amounts of hard
oxides, its macro-hardness is only 250 - 350 HV units, so
that the coating will be easy to machine.
~:'
6. Thermal conduction will not cause problems, since the
only interface hampering thermal conduction is the interface
`~ 10 between the coating and the base material.
... . .
~- 7. Patching of the coating is easy to perform locally,
without removing all of the old coating.
8. The cobalt content of the coating is very low (approx.
0.02 %), and so the coating is highly suitable for use in
nuclear power plants, also on surfaces on the active side.
In a nuclear power plant the division planes and some of
the turbine casing above and below the division planes
~- were coated by arc spraying with a coating according to
the invention, the analysis of which was 22 % Cr and 5 ~ Al.
: :'
After eight years of use the turbine was opened, whereupon
it was observed that the division planes were completely
flawless and that the coating above and below the division
planes had endured very well. On the other hand, the base
; material had worn off up to more than 10 mm in the area
adjacen~ to the border of the coating.
. - ~
, .,.~
. ~ ' .
.
,

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2067727 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2018-06-06
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-05-18
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2018-05-18
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2016-01-01
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2007-10-11
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2007-10-11
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-09-04
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2006-10-11
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2006-10-11
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-04-11
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-04-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-11
Letter Sent 2005-08-30
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-08-08
Letter Sent 2004-09-20
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-09-03
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2004-09-01
Inactive: MF/reinstatement fee unallocated - Log 25 deleted 2003-09-23
Letter Sent 2003-09-22
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2003-09-03
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-09-03
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-09-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2000-09-01
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2000-05-03
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 1998-09-22
Inactive: RFE acknowledged - Prior art enquiry 1998-09-22
Inactive: Application prosecuted on TS as of Log entry date 1998-09-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1998-09-02
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1998-09-02
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1992-03-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2007-09-04
2004-09-03
2003-09-03
2002-09-03

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2006-08-30

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 1997-09-03 1997-08-26
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 1998-09-03 1998-09-02
Request for examination - standard 1998-09-02
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 1999-09-03 1999-08-03
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2000-09-05 2000-08-29
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2001-09-04 2001-08-30
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - standard 11 2002-09-03 2003-09-03
Reinstatement 2003-09-03
MF (application, 12th anniv.) - standard 12 2003-09-03 2004-09-01
Reinstatement 2004-09-01
2004-09-01
Reinstatement 2005-08-08
MF (application, 13th anniv.) - standard 13 2004-09-03 2005-08-08
MF (application, 14th anniv.) - standard 14 2005-09-06 2005-08-24
MF (application, 15th anniv.) - standard 15 2006-09-05 2006-08-30
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TAMPELLA TELATEK OY
Past Owners on Record
BJARNE HELLMAN
JAAKKO TENKULA
JORMA MAJAVA
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1994-04-29 6 256
Claims 1994-04-29 2 72
Abstract 1995-08-16 1 58
Cover Page 1994-04-29 1 19
Claims 2000-08-31 3 106
Reminder - Request for Examination 1998-05-04 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 1998-09-21 1 172
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-09-30 1 182
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-10-28 1 176
Notice of Reinstatement 2003-09-21 1 166
Notice of Reinstatement 2004-09-19 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2004-10-31 1 176
Notice of Reinstatement 2005-08-29 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2006-12-19 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2006-12-19 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2007-10-29 1 173
PCT 1992-04-20 3 86
Fees 2003-09-02 1 40
Fees 2001-08-29 1 40
Fees 1998-09-01 1 50
Fees 1997-08-25 1 40
Fees 1999-08-02 1 37
Fees 2000-08-28 1 36
Fees 2004-08-31 1 36
Fees 2005-08-07 1 38
Fees 2005-08-23 1 43
Fees 1995-08-24 1 48
Fees 1996-08-22 1 47
Fees 1994-08-29 1 64
Fees 1993-08-15 1 50