Sélection de la langue

Search

Sommaire du brevet 2067727 

Énoncé de désistement de responsabilité concernant l'information provenant de tiers

Une partie des informations de ce site Web a été fournie par des sources externes. Le gouvernement du Canada n'assume aucune responsabilité concernant la précision, l'actualité ou la fiabilité des informations fournies par les sources externes. Les utilisateurs qui désirent employer cette information devraient consulter directement la source des informations. Le contenu fourni par les sources externes n'est pas assujetti aux exigences sur les langues officielles, la protection des renseignements personnels et l'accessibilité.

Disponibilité de l'Abrégé et des Revendications

L'apparition de différences dans le texte et l'image des Revendications et de l'Abrégé dépend du moment auquel le document est publié. Les textes des Revendications et de l'Abrégé sont affichés :

  • lorsque la demande peut être examinée par le public;
  • lorsque le brevet est émis (délivrance).
(12) Demande de brevet: (11) CA 2067727
(54) Titre français: ENDUIT POUR TURBINE A VAPEUR ET SURFACES D'ACIER CONTIGUES, ET METHODE D'ENDUCTION CONNEXE
(54) Titre anglais: COATING, AND A COATING METHOD, FOR A STEAM TURBINE AND ADJOINING STEEL SURFACES
Statut: Réputée abandonnée et au-delà du délai pour le rétablissement - en attente de la réponse à l’avis de communication rejetée
Données bibliographiques
(51) Classification internationale des brevets (CIB):
  • C23C 4/18 (2006.01)
  • F1D 5/28 (2006.01)
  • F1D 25/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventeurs :
  • TENKULA, JAAKKO (Finlande)
  • HELLMAN, BJARNE (Finlande)
  • MAJAVA, JORMA (Finlande)
(73) Titulaires :
  • TAMPELLA TELATEK OY
(71) Demandeurs :
  • TAMPELLA TELATEK OY (Finlande)
(74) Agent: AVENTUM IP LAW LLP
(74) Co-agent:
(45) Délivré:
(86) Date de dépôt PCT: 1991-09-03
(87) Mise à la disponibilité du public: 1992-03-19
Requête d'examen: 1998-09-02
Licence disponible: S.O.
Cédé au domaine public: S.O.
(25) Langue des documents déposés: Anglais

Traité de coopération en matière de brevets (PCT): Oui
(86) Numéro de la demande PCT: PCT/FI1991/000269
(87) Numéro de publication internationale PCT: FI1991000269
(85) Entrée nationale: 1992-04-21

(30) Données de priorité de la demande:
Numéro de la demande Pays / territoire Date
904369 (Finlande) 1990-09-04

Abrégés

Abrégé anglais

2067727 9204480 PCTABS00011
The present invention relates to the protection of the casing,
division planes, piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a
steam turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by steam, the coating comprising a
coating layer produced by the thermal spraying of a steel, alloyed
amply with chromium and aluminum, which during the coating
process oxidizes strongly in the spray, whereby large amounts of
chromium and aluminum oxides are formed, which will remain inside the
coating, surrounded by a steel matrix, and after the coating
process there will form on the surface of the coating layer, under the
oxidizing action of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide
layer. Another object of the invention is a related coating method.

Revendications

Note : Les revendications sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


WO 92/04480 PCT/FI91/00269
Claims
1. A coating intended for protecting the casing, division
planes, piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a
steam turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by hot wet steam,
characterized in that the coating comprises a coating layer
which has been produced by thermally spraying a steel,
alloyed amply with chromium and aluminum, which oxidizes
strongly in the spray during the coating process, whereby
large amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed
which will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a
steel matrix, and after the coating process there will
form on the surface of the coating layer, under the oxi-
dizing effect of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide
film.
2. A coating according to Claim 1, characterized in that
the coating is a steel which contains chromium 20 - 45 % by
weight, aluminum 5 - 15 % by weight and molybdenum 0 - 5 %
by weight, preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by weight, aluminum
5 - 8 % by weight, and molybdenum 0 - 3 % by weight.
3. A coating according to Claim 1 or 2, characterized in
that the coating is made up of one layer the thickness of
which is 0.3 - 2.5 mm.
4. A coating according to any of Claims 1-3, characterized
in that the thermal spraying is carried out by the arc,
plasma or supersonic method.
5. A method for coating the casing, division planes,
piping, superheaters and other steel parts of a steam
turbine which are subjected in a turbine plant to some
corrosive and erosive wear caused by hot wet steam,
characterized in that a coating material consisting of a
steel alloyed amply with chromium and aluminum is sprayed
thermally onto the surface to be coated, the coating
material oxidizing strongly in the spray during the coating

WO 92/04480 PCT/FI91/00269
process, whereby large amounts of chromium and aluminum
oxides are formed which will remain inside the coating,
surrounded by a steel matrix, and that after the coating
process the coating which has been formed will be exposed
to the oxidizing effect of air, whereupon a dense chromium
and aluminum oxide film will form on the surface of the
coating.
6. A method according to Claim 5, characterized in that
the coating material is a steel containing chromium 20 -
45 % by weight, aluminum 5 - 15 % by weight and molybdenum
0 - 5 % by weight, preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by weight,
aluminum 5 - 8 % by weight and molybdenum 0 - 3 % by weight.
7. A method according to Claim 5 or 6, characterized in
that a single-layer coating is formed the thickness of
which is 0.3 - 2.5 mm.
8. A method according to any of Claims 5-7, characterized
in that the thermal spraying is carried out by the arc,
plasma or supersonic method.

Description

Note : Les descriptions sont présentées dans la langue officielle dans laquelle elles ont été soumises.


~ W092/0~8~ 6 7 7 2 7 PCT/Flg~ 269
A coating, and a coating method, for a steam turbine and
adjoining steel surfaces
. ~
~-- 5 The invention relates to a coating intended for protecting
the interior surfaces of a steam turbine and the adjoining
pipes and superheaters, the coating preventing the erosive
and corrosive wear caused by steam. The invention also
relates to a method for coating the interior surfaces of a
steam turbine and the adjoining pipes and superheatersO
As stated in Swedish Patents/Patent Applications No. 762881
and 771073, steel surfaces exposed to hot, damp steam at
high pressures and velocities are subject to heavy erosive
and corrosive wear.
:, :
-' The damage caused by wear may lead to the need for fill-in
and repair weldings which are difficult to carry out! and
- even replacement of the turbine casing and pipes.
` 20
~- Such repair and replacement work causes long stoppages and
thereby large financial losses owing to reduced production.
This is the case in particular in large power plants such
as nuclear power plants.
For example the following coatings have been used for
protecting turbine pipes:
~! 1. Ceramic coating with a nickel-aluminum alloy in the ad-
- 30 hesive layer~ The thickness of the adhesive layer is 10 -
25 ,um and that of the ceramic coating 50 - 250 ~m.
2. Metallic so-called triple-layer coating, in which the
adhesive layer is a nickel-aluminum alloy (t = 50 - 100 ~m),
the intermediate layer is a chromium steel (approx. 13 ~ Cr,
; wlth a layer thickness of approx. 200 ,um), and the surface
layer is a stainless or acid-resistant steel (Cr = approx.
: '
: ., . .. , . . . .: . . . ~- ,, :
' . ' : ,: ' :, . : : .
.. , . : . , ,: . . . .
'~ ' . :. ' ' ' ' ' ,, ,' ' '~ .' ', : ' ' :
: . . :. . .
:'. . , ~ . :
; ' ,' ' ', `' : ' ; ' : ' '

W092/0~80 ~ I ` O ~ 7 7 2 ~ PCT/FI91/002~
18 ~, Ni = 5 - 8 %, and Mn = approx. 8 %, with a layer
thickness of approx. 200 ~m).
Ceramic coatings have, for example, the following disadvan~
tages:
.~ I '.
~i - poor shock resistance, for example, when foreign bodies
`~ enter the turbine or the pipes, they may break the coating;
- the thermal expansion coefficient of a ceramic coati~g
is very low compared with that of carbon steel, so that
great or rapid variations in the temperature may lead to
the cracking of the coating. A crack in the coating may, -
in turn, lead to rapid local damage to the base material;
- ceramic coatings are good insulators. The coating of
a turbine casing with a ceramic material could disturb
intra-turbine thermal conduction and cause unexpected
deformation during operation;
with a ceramic coating it is difficult to coat seal
surfaces which are to be machined. The coating may have a
hardness higher than 1000 HV, and therefore it is difficult
to machine, and, furthermore, the coating tends to crack;
- it is difficult to achieve a sufficient layer thickness
- with a ceramic coating if the coating is to be used for
filling cavities.
. '~' ,; ' ' .
So-called triple-layer coating has functioned satisfactorily
in pipe systems. However, this coating has the following
disadvantages: !
- in a triple-layer coating, each interface between the
different coatings constitutes a strong barrier to thermal
conduction, and so problems similar to those involved with
ceramic coatings may appear in thermal conduction in the
turbine casing;
:
, .
~ "
i~

~ W092/0~80 ~ 2 0 ~ 7 7 2 7 P~ 9~/00269
- if it is necessary to fill cavities in coating surfaces
- which are to be machined, there is the risk that the
: machined surface will run through different layers;
- if the triple-layer coating is damaged in operation, ~:
for example owing to strong local erosion, it must be
, , .
~ repaired by first removing the old coating entirely and by
then recoating the surface, layer by layer.
The primary object of the present invention is to provide
a coating which can be used for coating the casing, division
. planes, piping, superheaters and other parts of a steam `
: turbine so that reliable and long-term protection, suitable :;~
~ for the conditions involved, is obtained for the steel
:. 15 surfaces. It is a further object of the invention that the ::
. coating work can be carried out on the site rapidly and
:~: economically, and that the coating is also well suited for
~ the coating of surfaces which are to be machined. :`
.
The coating according to the invention is characteri~ed in
that the coating comprises a coating layer which has been
produced by the thermal spraying of a steel alloyed amply
with chromium and aluminum, whic:h, during the coating
process, oxidizes strongly in the spray, whereby large
-~ 25 amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed which
~ will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a steel
: matrix, and on the surface of the coating layer there will
form, after the coating process, under the oxidizing effect
of air, a dense chromium and aluminum oxide film.
: 30
The coating me~hod acsording to the invention is
characterized in that a coating material of steel alloyed
. ' amply with chromium and aluminum is sprayed thermally onto : -
the surface being coated, and this coating material oxidizes
strongly in the spray during the coating process, whereby
large amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides are formed
which will remain inside the coating, surrounded by a :
. steel matrix, and that, after the coating process, the
,
.~
,';
.: , . ., .: ' .
' ' ' . ','' ., ,' '

W092/~80 ~ 2 0 6 7 7 2 7 PC~/FI91/002 ~
coating which has been formed will be exposed to the
oxidizing effect of air, whereby a dense chromium and
aluminum oxide film will be formed on the surface of the
coating.
/ 5
According to the invention, the coating material used is a
steel preferably containing chromium 20 - 45 ~ by weight,
aluminum 5 - 15 ~ by weight and molybdenum 0 5 ~ by
weight, and especially preferably chromium 22 - 30 % by
weight, aluminum 5 - 8 ~ by weight and molybdenum 0 - 3
~- by weight. The coating material may be thread-like or
pulverous~
: ' . .
In the coating according to the invention, containing large
amounts of chromium and aluminum oxides, the contents of
chromium, aluminum and molybdenum are of the order presented
;~ above.
: .
The chromium and aluminum oxide film in the coating accord-
ing to the invention, formed under the effect of oxidation
after the coating process, is strong and dense, and will
- prevent erosive and corrosive wear caused by wet steam.
: . .
The coating according to the invention can be prepared by
; 25 thermal spraying, by using flame, arc, plasma and/or
supersonic spraying, but primarily arc, plasma and/or
supersonic spraying, in order to obtain good adhesion of
the coating to the base material.
Thus there is formed in the coating according to the
invention a layer with good adhesion to the base material,
a steel coating which contains a large amount of oxides,
~ and a surface layer which consists of a dense oxide film.
.. .
In order that no galvanic corrosion should occur on the
interface between the base material and the coating, the
thickness o~ the coating should be at minimum 0.3 mm,
preferably, however, 0.5 mm. The thickness of the coating
. ",~

~ wog~/o~o ` ' ' ; 2 0 6 77 2 7 PCT/Fi91/00~69
may be up to 2.5 mm without its pealing off because of
internal shrinkage of the coating.
The advantages of the coating according to the invent1on as
compared with previous ones are as follows:
.' " ~':
l. The very dense chromium and aluminum oxide film formed
~` on the surface of the coating provides excellent protection
against corrosion and erosion. Nevertheless, the coating is
: lO very tough.
~ If the coated surface is damaged, for example under the
- effect of a foreign body which has entered the turbine;
the oxides inside the coating will prevent propagation of
. ~ .
the damage.
" ' .
Thus the coating provides the protective effect of a ceramic
coating, but it has the toughness and strength of a metal
coating.
2. The adhesion of the coating to the base material is
very good. When arc or plasma spraying is used, an adhesion
strength greater than 60 N/mm is obtained, which is
` approximately double the adhesion str~ngth of a flame-
sprayed nickel and aluminum alloy.
: :-
Good adhesion guarantees that the coating will not become
detached by minor impacts, and that it will also be possible
to coat narrow edges. Furthermore, good adhesion enables
the surace to be machined.
3. The thermal expansion coefficient of the coating is
close to the thermal expansion coefficient of carbon steel,
so that deormation due to thermal shock and thermal
expansion will not damage the coating. -
. . .
4. Since the coating is made up of one single layer and
~i it can be sprayed approx. 2 mm thick, the coating is
, . .
': ' ' . ' ; , ,' ~,,: ' ' ~

~ W092/0~80 `'~ ``; 2 0 6 7 7 2 7 PCT/~9~
suitable for protecting very large seal surfaces which are
to be machined.
;
5. Although the coating contains large amounts of hard
oxides, its macro-hardness is only 250 - 350 HV units, so
that the coating will be easy to machine.
~:'
6. Thermal conduction will not cause problems, since the
only interface hampering thermal conduction is the interface
`~ 10 between the coating and the base material.
... . .
~- 7. Patching of the coating is easy to perform locally,
without removing all of the old coating.
8. The cobalt content of the coating is very low (approx.
0.02 %), and so the coating is highly suitable for use in
nuclear power plants, also on surfaces on the active side.
In a nuclear power plant the division planes and some of
the turbine casing above and below the division planes
~- were coated by arc spraying with a coating according to
the invention, the analysis of which was 22 % Cr and 5 ~ Al.
: :'
After eight years of use the turbine was opened, whereupon
it was observed that the division planes were completely
flawless and that the coating above and below the division
planes had endured very well. On the other hand, the base
; material had worn off up to more than 10 mm in the area
adjacen~ to the border of the coating.
. - ~
, .,.~
. ~ ' .
.
,

Dessin représentatif

Désolé, le dessin représentatif concernant le document de brevet no 2067727 est introuvable.

États administratifs

2024-08-01 : Dans le cadre de la transition vers les Brevets de nouvelle génération (BNG), la base de données sur les brevets canadiens (BDBC) contient désormais un Historique d'événement plus détaillé, qui reproduit le Journal des événements de notre nouvelle solution interne.

Veuillez noter que les événements débutant par « Inactive : » se réfèrent à des événements qui ne sont plus utilisés dans notre nouvelle solution interne.

Pour une meilleure compréhension de l'état de la demande ou brevet qui figure sur cette page, la rubrique Mise en garde , et les descriptions de Brevet , Historique d'événement , Taxes périodiques et Historique des paiements devraient être consultées.

Historique d'événement

Description Date
Inactive : Demande ad hoc documentée 2018-06-06
Exigences relatives à la révocation de la nomination d'un agent - jugée conforme 2018-05-18
Exigences relatives à la nomination d'un agent - jugée conforme 2018-05-18
Inactive : CIB expirée 2016-01-01
Inactive : CIB expirée 2016-01-01
Inactive : Morte - Aucune rép. dem. par.30(2) Règles 2007-10-11
Demande non rétablie avant l'échéance 2007-10-11
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2007-09-04
Inactive : Abandon. - Aucune rép dem par.30(2) Règles 2006-10-11
Inactive : Abandon. - Aucune rép. dem. art.29 Règles 2006-10-11
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2006-04-11
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur art.29 Règles 2006-04-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Inactive : CIB de MCD 2006-03-11
Lettre envoyée 2005-08-30
Exigences de rétablissement - réputé conforme pour tous les motifs d'abandon 2005-08-08
Lettre envoyée 2004-09-20
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2004-09-03
Exigences de rétablissement - réputé conforme pour tous les motifs d'abandon 2004-09-01
Inactive : TME/taxe rétabliss. retirée - Ent. 25 supprimée 2003-09-23
Lettre envoyée 2003-09-22
Exigences de rétablissement - réputé conforme pour tous les motifs d'abandon 2003-09-03
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2003-09-03
Réputée abandonnée - omission de répondre à un avis sur les taxes pour le maintien en état 2002-09-03
Modification reçue - modification volontaire 2000-09-01
Inactive : Dem. de l'examinateur par.30(2) Règles 2000-05-03
Inactive : Renseign. sur l'état - Complets dès date d'ent. journ. 1998-09-22
Inactive : Acc. réc. RE - Pas de dem. doc. d'antériorité 1998-09-22
Inactive : Dem. traitée sur TS dès date d'ent. journal 1998-09-22
Toutes les exigences pour l'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-02
Exigences pour une requête d'examen - jugée conforme 1998-09-02
Demande publiée (accessible au public) 1992-03-19

Historique d'abandonnement

Date d'abandonnement Raison Date de rétablissement
2007-09-04
2004-09-03
2003-09-03
2002-09-03

Taxes périodiques

Le dernier paiement a été reçu le 2006-08-30

Avis : Si le paiement en totalité n'a pas été reçu au plus tard à la date indiquée, une taxe supplémentaire peut être imposée, soit une des taxes suivantes :

  • taxe de rétablissement ;
  • taxe pour paiement en souffrance ; ou
  • taxe additionnelle pour le renversement d'une péremption réputée.

Les taxes sur les brevets sont ajustées au 1er janvier de chaque année. Les montants ci-dessus sont les montants actuels s'ils sont reçus au plus tard le 31 décembre de l'année en cours.
Veuillez vous référer à la page web des taxes sur les brevets de l'OPIC pour voir tous les montants actuels des taxes.

Historique des taxes

Type de taxes Anniversaire Échéance Date payée
TM (demande, 6e anniv.) - générale 06 1997-09-03 1997-08-26
TM (demande, 7e anniv.) - générale 07 1998-09-03 1998-09-02
Requête d'examen - générale 1998-09-02
TM (demande, 8e anniv.) - générale 08 1999-09-03 1999-08-03
TM (demande, 9e anniv.) - générale 09 2000-09-05 2000-08-29
TM (demande, 10e anniv.) - générale 10 2001-09-04 2001-08-30
TM (demande, 11e anniv.) - générale 11 2002-09-03 2003-09-03
Rétablissement 2003-09-03
TM (demande, 12e anniv.) - générale 12 2003-09-03 2004-09-01
Rétablissement 2004-09-01
2004-09-01
Rétablissement 2005-08-08
TM (demande, 13e anniv.) - générale 13 2004-09-03 2005-08-08
TM (demande, 14e anniv.) - générale 14 2005-09-06 2005-08-24
TM (demande, 15e anniv.) - générale 15 2006-09-05 2006-08-30
Titulaires au dossier

Les titulaires actuels et antérieures au dossier sont affichés en ordre alphabétique.

Titulaires actuels au dossier
TAMPELLA TELATEK OY
Titulaires antérieures au dossier
BJARNE HELLMAN
JAAKKO TENKULA
JORMA MAJAVA
Les propriétaires antérieurs qui ne figurent pas dans la liste des « Propriétaires au dossier » apparaîtront dans d'autres documents au dossier.
Documents

Pour visionner les fichiers sélectionnés, entrer le code reCAPTCHA :



Pour visualiser une image, cliquer sur un lien dans la colonne description du document (Temporairement non-disponible). Pour télécharger l'image (les images), cliquer l'une ou plusieurs cases à cocher dans la première colonne et ensuite cliquer sur le bouton "Télécharger sélection en format PDF (archive Zip)" ou le bouton "Télécharger sélection (en un fichier PDF fusionné)".

Liste des documents de brevet publiés et non publiés sur la BDBC .

Si vous avez des difficultés à accéder au contenu, veuillez communiquer avec le Centre de services à la clientèle au 1-866-997-1936, ou envoyer un courriel au Centre de service à la clientèle de l'OPIC.


Description du
Document 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Nombre de pages   Taille de l'image (Ko) 
Description 1994-04-29 6 256
Revendications 1994-04-29 2 72
Abrégé 1995-08-16 1 58
Page couverture 1994-04-29 1 19
Revendications 2000-08-31 3 106
Rappel - requête d'examen 1998-05-04 1 117
Accusé de réception de la requête d'examen 1998-09-21 1 172
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2002-09-30 1 182
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2003-10-28 1 176
Avis de retablissement 2003-09-21 1 166
Avis de retablissement 2004-09-19 1 166
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2004-10-31 1 176
Avis de retablissement 2005-08-29 1 164
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (R30(2)) 2006-12-19 1 167
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (R29) 2006-12-19 1 167
Courtoisie - Lettre d'abandon (taxe de maintien en état) 2007-10-29 1 173
PCT 1992-04-20 3 86
Taxes 2003-09-02 1 40
Taxes 2001-08-29 1 40
Taxes 1998-09-01 1 50
Taxes 1997-08-25 1 40
Taxes 1999-08-02 1 37
Taxes 2000-08-28 1 36
Taxes 2004-08-31 1 36
Taxes 2005-08-07 1 38
Taxes 2005-08-23 1 43
Taxes 1995-08-24 1 48
Taxes 1996-08-22 1 47
Taxes 1994-08-29 1 64
Taxes 1993-08-15 1 50