Language selection

Search

Patent 2069126 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2069126
(54) English Title: PROCESS FOR FLUORINATING HALOGENATED HYDROCARBON
(54) French Title: PROCEDE POUR LA PREPARATION D'HYDROCARBURES HALOGENES FLUORES
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C07C 19/08 (2006.01)
  • B01J 27/132 (2006.01)
  • C07C 17/20 (2006.01)
  • C07C 17/21 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SHIBANUMA, TAKASHI (Japan)
  • KANEMURA, TAKASHI (Japan)
  • KOYAMA, SATOSHI (Japan)
(73) Owners :
  • DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD. (Japan)
(71) Applicants :
  • SHIBANUMA, TAKASHI (Japan)
  • KANEMURA, TAKASHI (Japan)
  • KOYAMA, SATOSHI (Japan)
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2002-02-19
(22) Filed Date: 1992-05-21
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-11-24
Examination requested: 1999-01-26
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
118437/1991 Japan 1991-05-23

Abstracts

English Abstract




The present invention is directed to a halogenated
hydrocarbon which is effectively fluorinated by reacting the
halogenated hydrocarbon with hydrogen fluoride in the presence
of a fluorination catalyst. The catalyst comprises a
partially fluorinated chromium oxide containing at least one
metal selected from the group consisting of ruthenium and
platinum.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




-10-
Claims:
1. A process for fluorinating a halogenated hydrocarbon
comprising reacting a halogenated hydrocarbon with hydrogen
fluoride in the presence of a fluorination catalyst which
comprises a partially fluorinated chromium oxide containing at
least one metal selected from the group consisting of
ruthenium and platinum.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein said
halogenated hydrocarbon is 1,1,1-trifluorochloroethane and
1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane is prepared.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein said chromium
oxide is supported on a carrier selected from the group
consisting of aluminum oxide, partially fluorinated aluminum
oxide and aluminum fluoride.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein said catalyst
contains 0.01 to 10 % by mole of said at least one metal based
on an amount of chromium oxide.
5. The process according to claim 2, wherein molar ratio of
hydrogen fluoride to said halogenated hydrocarbon is from
0.9:1 to 16:1.
6. The process according to claim 2, wherein reaction
temperature is from 290°C to 380°C.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





__ 2069126
-1-
PROCESS FOR FLUORINATING HALOGENATED HYDROCARBON
The present invention relates to a process for
fluorinating a halogenated hydrocarbon. More particularly,
the present invention relates to a process for preparing a
hydrocarbon such as 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane which is useful
S as a refrigerant, a blowing agent, a propellant, a cleaning
agent and the like.
As a fluorination catalyst, chromium oxide which may be
supported on alumina is known (see Japanese Patent Publication
Nos. 10310/1964, 3004/1967 and 44973/1987 and U.S. Patent Nos.
3,426,009, 3,755,477 and 4,158,675). Also, fluorination in
the presence of a chromium salt or partially fluorinated
chromium oxide which may be supported on a carrier is known
(see U.S. Patent Nos. 2,745,886 and 2,885,427, DE Patent No.
1,252,182, Japanese Patent Publication No. 54503/1976,
Japanese Patent Kokai Publication No. 132549/1978 and
W089/10341).
There is also known a catalyst comprising chromium oxide
and an additive such as NaF (U.S. Patent No. 3,644,545), Mg or
Ba (Japanese Patent Publication No. 43922/1974), a transition
metal (U. S. Patent No. 4,792,643) or A1P04 (Japanese Patent
Publication No. 17413/1989). Further, there are known
processes using a catalyst comprising metal chromium (Japanese
Patent Kokai Publication Nos. 19038/1985 and 221338/1989) or a
metal other than chromium (Japanese Patent Kokai Publication
Nos. 186945/1987, 268651/1989, 172933/1990 and 95438/1990).
U.S. Patent No. 4,766,259 discloses a fluorination
reaction using partially fluorinated aluminum oxide.
t
,. ",
,.




2069126
-2-
A liquid phase fluorination reaction using an Sb catalyst
is known. In addition, a liquid phase fluorination reaction
using an alkali metal fluoride as a catalyst is known (see
U.S. Patent No. 4,311,863 and Japanese Patent Kokai
Publication No. 228925/1989).
Now, the fluorination of a halogenated hydrocarbon is
explained by reference to the preparation of 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (hereinafter referred to as "134a") through
fluorination of trichloroethylene or 1,1,1-
trifluorochloroethane (hereinafter referred to as "133a") in a
gas phase. It is not advantageous to synthesize 134a from
133a by a liquid phase reaction in view of low yield and
material of the reactor.
When the above fluorination reaction is carried out in a
gas phase, conversion of 133a to 134a is low due to
equilibrium. Therefore, a catalyst to be used should catalyze
this reaction at a relatively low conversion and have a
sufficiently long life and a good selectivity in industrial
use. Prolongation of the catalyst life avoids frequent
catalyst changes and lowers the catalyst cost.
The catalyst life can be prolonged by the addition of
chlorine gas (Japanese Patent Publication No. 33604/1977) or
oxygen gas (GB Patent No. 2,030,981 and Japanese Patent Kokai
Publication Nos. 82206/1976 and 272535/1989) to a reaction gas
mixture. When the chlorine gas is added, selection of the
reactor material may be limited and also an increase in by-
products must be considered. When the oxygen gas is added,
conversion may be decreased.
.i




2069126
-3-
In view of the above, it is advantageous to provide a
catalyst which has as long a life as possible. When such a
catalyst exhibits excellent catalytic activity, not only the
catalyst cost but also the size of the reactor which is made
of high quality expensive material can be reduced
advantageously.
One object of the present invention is to provide an
improved catalyst which can catalyze a gas phase fluorination
of a halogenated hydrocarbon.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an
improved process for fluorinating a halogenated hydrocarbon in
a gas phase.
According to the present invention, there is provided a
process for fluorinating a halogenated hydrocarbon comprising
reacting a halogenated hydrocarbon with hydrogen fluoride in
the presence of a fluorination catalyst which comprises a
partially fluorinated chromium oxide (III) containing at least
one metal selected from the group consisting of ruthenium and
platinum. In particular, the present invention provides a
process for preparing 134a by reacting 133a with hydrogen
fluoride in the presence of the above catalyst according to
the following reaction formula:
CF3CHZC1 + HF -j CF3CHZF + HC1
Hereinafter, the term "halogenated hydrocarbon" is
intended to mean a hydrocarbon having at least one halogen
atom other than a fluorine atom.
Examples of the halogenated hydrocarbon to be fluorinated
by the process of the present invention are 133a, CC14, CHC13,




2069126
-4-
CH2C12, CH3C1, CC13F, CCl2Fz, CZC14, CZC13H, CHCIzCF3, CHC1FCF3,
etc.
The catalyst used according to the present invention
comprises chromium oxide or chromium hydroxide carrying at
least one metal selected from the group consisting of
ruthenium and platinum. Chromium oxide or chromium hydroxide
may be supported on a carrier such as aluminum oxide,
fluorinated aluminum oxide or aluminum fluoride. The
ruthenium or platinum content is from 0.01 to 10 % by mole,
preferably from 0.01 to 6 a by mole based on the amount of
chromium oxide or chromium hydroxide. When the ruthenium or
platinum content is too large, the catalytic activity may
deteriorate.
To carry ruthenium and/or platinum on the catalyst, their
chloride, hydroxide, oxide, chlorometallic acid, and the like
are used.
Ruthenium and/or platinum can be carried on the catalyst
by impregnation, precipitation or mixing.
When chromium hydroxide is used, chromium hydroxide
carrying ruthenium and/or platinum is sintered to convert
chromium hydroxide to chromium oxide and fluorinated with
hydrogen fluoride. When chromium oxide is used, it is
fluorinated after ruthenium and/or platinum are added. While
ruthenium or platinum is present in a metal form, its surface
is partially covered with a fluoride. Chromium oxide is
partially fluorinated. The term "partially fluorinated" is
intended to mean that chromium oxide contains 8 to 48 a by
weight, preferably 15 to 44 o by weight of fluorine.




_5_
In the reaction according to the present invention, the
conversion and/or the catalyst life can be adjusted by
changing the reaction conditions such as the molar ratio of
hydrogen fluoride to the halogenated hydrocarbon, reaction
temperature, etc. When 133a is fluorinated, the molar ratio
of hydrogen fluoride to the halogenated hydrocarbon is from
0.9:1 to 16:1, preferably 1:1 to 10:1, and the reaction
temperature is from 290°C to 380°C.
Reaction pressure is not critical. However, a pressure
higher than atmospheric pressure is not preferred since the
catalytic activity is reduced.
The present invention will be explained in further detail
by the following examples.
In the examples and comparative examples, common reaction
conditions were employed. That is, the molar ratio of
hydrogen fluoride to raw material 1,1,1-trifluoro-
dichloroethane was 1:1, reaction temperature was 350°C, and
contact time (namely ratio (g.sec/Nml) of catalyst weight W to
flow rate F) was 0.4. The maximum conversion achieved by
these conditions was about 13 0 (equilibrium conversion).
The reactor used was a Hasteloy* C made tube having an
inner diameter of 15 mm, and the gas flow rate was 600 ml/min.
Definitions of activity, catalyst life and throughput are
as follows:
The activity is the achieved maximum conversion (o).
* Trademark




2069126
-6-
The catalyst life is the time (hr) at which the
conversion decreased to 60 0 of the maximum value.
The throughput is the amount of the reaction product
(134a) produced by one gram of the catalyst during the
catalyst life time.
Preparation of Standard Catalyst
A partially fluorinated chromium oxide catalyst which
contains no additional metal and is used as a standard
catalyst was produced as follows:
To a 5.7 o aqueous solution of chromium nitrate, 10 0
aqueous ammonia in an equivalent amount was dropwise added to
precipitate chromium hydroxide. The precipitate was filtered,
washed with water and dried in air at 120°C for 12 hours. The
catalyst at this stage is referred to as "chromium hydroxide
state catalyst"
This catalyst was pelletized by a pelletizer and kept in
a nitrogen stream at 400°C for 2 hours (sintering), followed
by fluorination with hydrogen fluoride (HF treatment). Then,
the catalyst was ground to a powder having a particle size of
300 to 1000 micrometers. Four grams of the ground catalyst
was used in the reaction. This catalyst was used as a
standard catalyst.
Comparative Example 1
Using a standard catalyst produced from the same chromium
hydroxide state catalyst as used in Example 1, the
fluorination was carried out under the above common
conditions. The results are as follows:




2069126
_7_
Activity: 12.60
Catalyst life: 78 hours
Throughput: 177 g
Example 1
The chromium hydroxide state catalyst was mixed with an
aqueous solution of ruthenium chloride the amount of which was
adjusted so that the Ru/Cr ratio was 4.7 % by mole and dried
in the air at 110°C for 12 hours. Thereafter, the catalyst
was sintered and HF-treated in the same manner as in the
preparation of the standard catalyst, and the fluorination was
carried out under the above common conditions. The results
are as follows:
Activity: 12.2%
Catalyst life: 105 hours
Throughput: 235 g
In comparison with Comparative Example 1, the catalyst
life and the throughput were increased without decreasing the
activity.
Example 2
The chromium hydroxide state catalyst was mixed with an
aqueous solution of ruthenium chloride the amount of which was
adjusted so that the Ru/Cr ratio was 0.87 % by mole and dried
in air at 110°C for 12 hours. Thereafter, the catalyst was
sintered and HF-treated in the same manner as in the
preparation of the standard catalyst, and the fluorination was
carried out under the above common conditions. The results
are as follows:




2069126
_g_
Activity: 12.3%
Catalyst life: 155 hours
Throughput: 329 g
In comparison with Comparative Example 1, the catalyst
life and the throughput were increased without decreasing the
activity.
Example 3
The chromium hydroxide state catalyst was mixed with an
aqueous solution of ruthenium chloride the amount of which was
adjusted so that the Ru/Cr ratio was 0.094 o by mole and dried
in air at 110°C for 12 hours. Thereafter, the catalyst was
sintered and HF-treated in the same manner as in the
preparation of the standard catalyst, and the fluorination was
carried out under the above common conditions. The results
are as follows:
Activity: l2.la
Catalyst life r 115 hours
Throughput: 244 g
In comparison with Comparative Example 1, the catalyst
life and the throughput were increased without decreasing the
activity.
Example
The chromium hydroxide state catalyst was mixed with an
aqueous solution of chloroplatinic acid the amount of which
was adjusted so that the Pt/Cr ratio was 0.24 % by mole and
water was removed with an evaporator followed by the HF-
treatment in the same manner as in the preparation of the
standard catalyst. Using this catalyst, the fluorination was
~a




2069126
_g_
carried out under the above common conditions. The results
are as follows:
Activity: 130
Catalyst life: 63 hours
Throughput: 153 g
In comparison with Comparative Example 1, the catalyst
life and the throughput were increased without decreasing the
activity.
Comparative Example 2
Using the same standard catalyst as in Example 4, the
fluorination was carried out under the common conditions. The
results are as follows:
Activity: 13%
Catalyst life: 40 hours
Throughput: 93 g

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2069126 was not found.

Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2002-02-19
(22) Filed 1992-05-21
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1992-11-24
Examination Requested 1999-01-26
(45) Issued 2002-02-19
Deemed Expired 2010-05-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1992-05-21
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1992-12-04
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1994-05-23 $100.00 1994-03-28
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1995-05-22 $100.00 1995-04-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1996-05-21 $100.00 1996-03-29
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1997-05-21 $150.00 1997-04-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1998-05-21 $150.00 1998-04-08
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-01-26
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1999-05-21 $150.00 1999-04-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2000-05-22 $150.00 2000-04-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2001-05-21 $150.00 2001-04-12
Final Fee $300.00 2001-11-28
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2002-05-21 $200.00 2002-04-09
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2003-05-21 $200.00 2003-04-14
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2004-05-21 $250.00 2004-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2005-05-23 $250.00 2005-04-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2006-05-22 $250.00 2006-04-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2007-05-21 $450.00 2007-04-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2008-05-21 $450.00 2008-04-10
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Past Owners on Record
KANEMURA, TAKASHI
KOYAMA, SATOSHI
SHIBANUMA, TAKASHI
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 1999-03-01 1 13
Cover Page 2002-01-30 1 26
Cover Page 1994-01-20 1 15
Abstract 1994-01-20 1 10
Claims 1994-01-20 1 26
Description 1994-01-20 10 287
Description 1999-03-01 9 322
Claims 1999-03-01 1 30
Prosecution-Amendment 2001-07-17 1 36
Correspondence 2001-08-20 1 12
Assignment 1992-05-21 6 240
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-01-26 27 803
Correspondence 2001-11-28 1 37
Fees 1997-04-03 1 40
Fees 1996-03-29 1 38
Fees 1995-04-20 1 49
Fees 1994-03-28 1 33