Language selection

Search

Patent 2075738 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2075738
(54) English Title: CO-EXTRUDED SHOCK TUBE
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION DE TUBES A CHOC PAR COEXTRUSION
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F42C 19/02 (2006.01)
  • B21K 21/00 (2006.01)
  • B29C 47/06 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • OSBORNE, ALFRED M. (United States of America)
  • HARDER, PATRICK J. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • DYNO NOBEL INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
  • IRECO INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2002-02-26
(22) Filed Date: 1992-08-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-02-16
Examination requested: 1999-03-05
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
745,385 United States of America 1991-08-15

Abstracts

English Abstract



The invention relates to a method of manufacturing a low-
energy shock tube by co-extruding two or more layers simultaneously
wherein the inner layer has an adhesive affinity for a powdered
reactive material and the outer layer(s) provides abrasion, cut and
other environmental resistance to the tube. The wall thickness of
the inner layer is less than about 0.3 millimeters. The invention
also relates to a low-energy shock tube having such configuration
and inner layer thickness.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CLAIMS:
1. A method of reducing the thickness of the inner layer of a
multi-layer low-energy shock tube comprising the steps of:
(a) heating at least two plastic materials to their
respective, desired extrusion temperatures;
(b) extruding simultaneously by a co-extrusion process the
plastic materials to form a layered plastic tube having at least
an inner layer with an inner surface and an outer layer, the
inner layer being extruded in a thickness of less than 0.3
millimeter and the inner surface of the inner layer having an
adhesive affinity for a reactive material, and the outer layer
having abrasion and cut resistance; and
(c) feeding a reactive material to the inner surface of the
inner layer as it is being co-extruded to form a thin layer of
the reactive material on the inner surface.
2. A method according to claim 1 comprising the additional step
of cooling the co-extruded tubing to or below its solidification
temperature.
3. A method according to claim 1 comprising the additional step
of stretching the tube to obtain the desired surface density of
the reactive material, to increase the axial orientation of
molecules of the plastic materials and thereby increase the
tensile strength of the tube and to reduce further the inner
layer thickness.
4. A method according to claim 2 comprising the additional step
of stretching the tube after it has been co-extruded to obtain
the desired surface density of the reactive material, to increase
the axial orientation of molecules of the plastic materials and


thereby increase the tensile strength of the tube and to reduce
further the inner layer thickness.
5. A method according to claim 1 wherein a third, ultimate outer
layer is co-extruded with the other layers.
6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the third layer has
resistance to degradation from contact with ultraviolet rays or
liquid organics.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.





2~~~~~~
CO-EXTRUDED SHOCK TUBE
The present invention relates to a low-energy fuse or shock
tube for propagating a percussion or impact wave within and along
the tube for activation of a detonator. More particularly, the
present invention relates to a mufti-layer tube that is co-
extruded, wherein the innermost layer has adhesive affinity for a
reactive material and a wall thickness of less than about 0.3
millimeter. The outer layers) has abrasion and cut resistance,
and an optional outermost layer may be resistent to degradation
from contact with either ultraviolet rays or liquid organics. By
"co-extrusion°' is meant forming the tube and its layers in a
continuous, simultaneous operation through an extrusion element as
is known in the art.
The invention comprises a method of manufacturing a low-energy
shock tube comprising the steps of: (a) heating two or more
materials to their respective desired extrusion temperatures; (b)
co-extruding the materials to form a layered plastic tube having at
least an inner layer with an inner surface and an outer layer, the
inner surface of the inner layer having an adhesive affinity for a
reactive material and the inner layer having a thickness of less
than about 0.3 millimeter and the outer layer having abrasion and
cut resistance; (c) feeding a reactive material to the inner
surface of the inner layer as it is being co-extruded with the
other layer or layers to form a thin layer of the reactive material
on the inner surface; and (d) optionally cooling the co-extruded
tubing to or below its solidification temperature and/or stretching
R9965A


the tube after i.t has been co-extruded to obtain the desired
surface density of the reactive material, to increase the axial
orientation of molecules of the plastic materials and thereby
increase the tensile strength of the tube and to attain the desired
inner layer thickness. The invention further comprises a shock
tube whose inner layer has a wall thickness of less than about 0.3
millimeter.
FIG. 1 is a transverse cross section of a preferred embodiment
of a tube according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the process steps involved in the
method of the present invention.
Reference to FIG. 1 shows a shack tube 1 in accordance with
the present invention having an inner layer 2 with an inner surface
3 having an adhesive affinity for a reactive material 3b. The
inner layer preferably has an adhesive property of at least 5.5
g/m2 for the reactive material, which preferably is in powdered
form. The inner layer 2 preferably is selected from the group
consisting of SURLYN, ethylene/acrylic acid copolymers, ethylene
vinyl acetate and other plastics and adhesives. In its final form,
either as extruded or after stretching, the wall thickness of the
inner layer 2 is less than about 0.3 millimeter.
An outer layer 4 is shown having a greater wall thickness than
that of inner layer 2. This preferably provides for greater
tensile strength and increased abrasion and cut resistance. The
outer layer 4 preferably is selected from the group consisting of
polyethylene, polyethylene blends 'with ionomer, polypropylene,
R9965A 2

polybutelyne, nylon and other polyolefins. This outer layer 4
preferably has a tensile strength of at least 35 MPa. An optional
outermost layer 5 is shown that preferably provides protection from
ultraviolet rays and/or chemicals such as organic liquids. A
problem with shock tubes heretofore has been their susceptibility
to degradation upon exposure to ultraviolet rays and/or organic
liquids that are commonly found in blasting agents that the shock
tube often contacts during application in the field. By reducing
the wall thickness and thus the cost of the inner layer 2 and by
co-extruding the layers, such optional outer layer 5 can be added
without making the finished product overly expensive. The optional
outermost layer 5 preferably selected from the group consisting of
linear low, medium or high density polyethylene, polyester,
polyvinylidene chloride and mixtures thereof.
The final surface density of the reactive material 3b on the
inner surface of the inner layer can be varied as desired as known
in the art. Typically, at least 2.7 g of reactive material per m2
of the inner surface is desired. If the tube is stretched, the
initial surface density before stretching may not be significantly
changed after stretching, since the inner diameter may be reduced
as the tube length is increased. The reactive material preferably
is a powder mixture of such materials as PETN, RDX, HMX, powdered
aluminum or other fuels and mixtures thereof.
Reference to FIG. 2 illustrates the method of the present
invention. The inner layer material is extruded by an extruder 6
through the crosshead die 9. Simultaneously, the outer layer
R9965A 3



Y
material is extruded by extruder 7 also through crosshead die 9.
Crosshead die 9 is configured as known in the art so as to regulate
the f low of the extruded materials and to position the material
from extruder 6 internal and concentric to the material from
extruder 7 thereby forming the two-layered tube configuration as
the materials simultaneously exit from crosshead die 9.
Optionally, a third, ultimate outer layer material can be fed to
crosshead die 9 from extruder 13. Simultaneously with the feeding
of the inner and outer layer materials from extruders 6 and 7,
reactive material, preferably in powder form, is fed by reactive
material feeder 8 through crosshead die 9 and to the inner surface
of the inner layer to thereby coat the same.
The layer materials that are extruded through extruders 6 and
7 are pre--heated to their respective desired extrusion
temperatures, and optionally, the two-layered tube exiting from
crosshead die 9 is passed through a cooler 10, such as a water
bath. Further optionally, the co-extruded tube may be stretched
through stretcher 11 for purposes previously described. Stretcher
11 may comprise two pulleys, one which takes tubing from the
crosshead die 9 and then acts as a brake or anchor for a second
pulley which operates at a faster rate and thus stretches the
tubing between the two pulleys. Still further optionally, the tube
may be wound on a take-up reel l2 by conventional means or
otherwise gathered or collected as desired:
The invention can be further described by reference to the
following examples.
R9965A 4


CA 02075738 1999-OS-18
Example 1. A co-extruded tube was formed by heating SURLYN to
a temperature of about 230°C and extruding it by means of a 1-inch
single screw extruder through a crosshead die while simultaneously
heating linear low density polyethylene to a temperature of about
220°C and extruding this material by means of a 1.5-inch single
screw extruder through the same crosshead die. The SURLYN material
formed the inner layer. The co-extruded tube that exited from the
crosshead die had an outside diameter of 3.0 mm and an inside
diameter of 1.1 mm. The ~URLYN* inner layer had a uniform wall
thickness of 0.05 mm. The tube was cooled to a temperature of
about 25°C and then wound on a take-up reel.
Example 2. A co-extruded tube was formed using the same
extruders and inner and outer layer materials employed in Example
1 above. In this example, however, a differently sized crosshead
die was used. The result was a two-layered tube having an outside
diameter of 4.5 mm and an inside diameter of 2.1 mm. After cooling
to a temperature of about 30°C, the tube was then stretched so that
its outside diameter was reduced to 3.0 mm and its inside diameter
was reduced to 1.2 mm. The final wall thickness of the SURLYN
inner layer was 0.25 mm. This stretched tube had a much higher
tensile strength than the tube produced in Example 1. The
increased tensile strength was the result of orientation of the
plastic molecules by the stretching process.
While the present invention has been described with reference
to certain illustrative examples and preferred embodiments, various
modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art and any
R9965A 5
* Trade-mark

2~~~~~8
modifications are intended to be within the scope of the inTrention
as ,set forth in the appended claims.
R9965A 6

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2002-02-26
(22) Filed 1992-08-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection 1993-02-16
Examination Requested 1999-03-05
(45) Issued 2002-02-26
Deemed Expired 2011-08-11

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1992-08-11
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-03-12
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1994-02-08
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1994-08-11 $100.00 1994-07-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1995-08-11 $100.00 1995-07-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1996-08-12 $100.00 1996-07-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 1997-08-11 $150.00 1997-07-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 1998-08-11 $150.00 1998-07-16
Request for Examination $400.00 1999-03-05
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 1999-08-11 $150.00 1999-07-19
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 8 2000-08-11 $150.00 2000-07-18
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 9 2001-08-13 $150.00 2001-07-16
Final Fee $300.00 2001-12-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2002-08-12 $200.00 2002-07-18
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2003-08-11 $200.00 2003-07-17
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2004-08-11 $250.00 2004-07-19
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2005-08-11 $250.00 2005-07-12
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2006-08-11 $250.00 2006-07-05
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2007-08-13 $450.00 2007-07-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2008-08-11 $450.00 2008-07-10
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2009-08-11 $450.00 2009-07-13
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
DYNO NOBEL INC.
Past Owners on Record
HARDER, PATRICK J.
IRECO INCORPORATED
OSBORNE, ALFRED M.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1993-12-14 6 217
Abstract 1993-12-14 1 15
Cover Page 1993-12-14 1 17
Drawings 1993-12-14 1 24
Claims 1993-12-14 3 81
Description 1999-05-18 6 220
Claims 1999-05-18 2 53
Cover Page 2002-02-06 1 34
Representative Drawing 1999-06-17 1 10
Representative Drawing 2001-09-12 1 8
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-03-05 1 22
Assignment 1992-08-11 10 321
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-04-21 2 66
Prosecution-Amendment 1999-05-18 5 139
Correspondence 2001-12-05 1 25
Fees 1996-07-19 1 170
Fees 1995-07-20 1 180
Fees 1994-07-22 1 237