Language selection

Search

Patent 2089365 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2089365
(54) English Title: COMMUNICATION TRANSFER IN A RADIOTELEPHONE SYSTEM
(54) French Title: TRANSFERT DE COMMUNICATION DANS UN SYSTEME RADIOTELEPHONIQUE
Status: Deemed expired
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04W 36/30 (2009.01)
  • H04B 7/26 (2006.01)
  • H04Q 7/38 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FELIX, KENNETH A. (United States of America)
  • WERRONEN, ALTON P. (United States of America)
  • HART, THOMAS B. (United States of America)
  • HARDMAN, SCOTT A. (United States of America)
  • HULSEBOSCH, THOMAS G. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MOTOROLA, INC. (United States of America)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 1996-06-11
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1991-08-16
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1992-03-28
Examination requested: 1993-02-11
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1991/005796
(87) International Publication Number: WO1992/006543
(85) National Entry: 1993-02-11

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
588,771 United States of America 1990-09-27
612,292 United States of America 1990-11-13

Abstracts

English Abstract






A cellular system transfers a call from a source base-site (200) to one target base-site (205, 210). A source base-site (200)
measures the signal strength (RSSIS) of a mobile (225), provides a forecasted signal strength (RSSIF) and sets up two time
windows. The source base-site (200) sends the measured and forecasted signal strengths to candidate base-sites (205, 210)
found by the mobile (225) which measure the mobile (225) signal strength (RSSIT) and compare it to (RSSIS + hysteresis
value). If RSSIT> RSSIS, the call is transferred to the best responding cell. If RSSIT< RSSIS, RSSIT is compared to RSSIF.
During this time, the mobile (225) will increase power at the end of the first time window. If RSSIT> RSSIF at any candi-
date base-sites (205, 210), the call is transferred to the responding base-site (205, 210). If the source base-site (200) receives
no responses during the second time window, the process ends.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



1. A radiotelephone system having a mobile unit communicating to a
source base-site, the mobile unit requiring a communication transfer from
the source base-site to a selected one target base-site, the radiotelephone
system comprising:

means, at the source base-site, for obtaining a first signal quality
value of a signal received by the source base-site;
means, at the source base-site, for providing a second signal quality
value;
means, at the source base-site, for providing at least a first
predetermined time period and a second predetermined time period;
means, at at least the selected one target base-site, for obtaining a
third signal quality value of said signal received by at least the selected
one target base-site;
means, at at least the selected one target base-site, for comparing
said first signal quality value to said third signal quality value during said
first predetermined time period and for comparing said second signal
quality value to said third signal quality value during said second
predetermined time period; and
means, responsive to said means for comparing, for transferring
communication from the source base-site to at least the selected one target
base-site during at least either said first predetermined time period or said
second predetermined time period.



2. The radiotelephone system of claim 1 wherein said
means for obtaining a first signal quality value further
comprises means for providing a hysteresis value
correlating the physical location of the source base-site
and at least the selected one target base-site.

3. The radiotelephone system of claim 2 wherein said
means for comparing further comprises means for
responding when said third signal quality value is greater
than said first signal quality value plus said hysteresis
value.

4. The radiotelephone system of claim 1 wherein said
means for comparing further comprises means for
responding when said third signal quality value is greater
than said second signal quality value.




13




6. A method of communication transfer in a radiotelephone system
having a mobile unit communicating to a source base-site, the mobile unit
requiring a communication transfer from the source base-site to a selected
one target base-site, the method comprising the steps of:

obtaining, at the source base-site, a first signal quality value of a
signal received by the source base-site;
estimating a second signal quality value;
obtaining, at the target base-site, a third signal quality value of said
signal;
comparing, at the target base-site, said first signal quality value to
said third signal quality value during a first time period;
transferring communication, responsive to said first step of
comparing, from the source base-site to the target base-site if said third
signal quality value is preferable over said first signal quality value;
comparing, at the target base-site, said second signal quality value to
said third signal quality value during a second time period; and
transferring communication, responsive to said second step of
comparing, from the source base-site to the target base-site if said third
signal quality value is preferable over said second signal quality value.




14


6. A radiotelephone system requiring a communication transfer
from a source base-site to a selected one target base-site, comprising:
means for providing a threshold associated with the source base-
site;
means for obtaining a first signal quality value of a signal
received by the source base-site;
means for estimating a second signal quality value based on said
first signal quality value;
means for obtaining a third signal quality value of said signal
received by at least the selected one target base-site;
means for sending a communication transfer request to at least
the selected one target base-site when said first signal quality value is
less than said threshold;
means, at the selected target base-site and coupled to said
means for sending, for responding to the source base-site when said
third signal quality value is greater than said first signal quality value
during a first predetermined time period;
means, at the selected target base-site and coupled to said
means for sending, for responding to the source base-site when said
third signal quality value is greater than said second signal quality value
during a second predetermined time period; and
means, coupled to said means for responding, for transferring
communication from the source base-site to the selected one target
base-site.







7. The radiotelephone system of claim 1 wherein said means for
sending said communication transfer request further comprises means for
including said first signal quality value in said communication transfer
request.

8. The radiotelephone system of claim 1 wherein said means for
obtaining a first signal quality value further comprises means for providing
a hysteresis value correlating the physical locations of the source base-site
and at least the selected one target base-site.

9. The radiotelephone system of claim 8 wherein said means for
responding to the source base-site when said third signal quality value
is greater than said first signal quality value further comprises:

means for maintaining communication on the source base-site when
said third signal quality value is less than said first signal quality value;
and
means for responding to the source base-site when said third
signal quality value is greater than said first signal quality value plus said
hysteresis value.




16


10. A method of communication transfer from a source base-site to
a selected one target base-site in a radiotelephone system comprising
the steps of:
providing a threshold associated with the source base-site;
obtaining a first signal quality value of a signal received by the
source base-site;
estimating a second signal quality value based on said first signal
quality value;
obtaining a third signal quality value of said signal received by at
least the selected one target base-site;
sending a communication transfer request when said first signal
quality value is less than said threshold;
responding to the source base-site when said third signal quality
value is greater than said first signal quality value during a first
predetermined time period;
responding to the source base-site when said third signal quality
value is greater than said second signal quality value during a second
predetermined time period; and
transferring communication from the source base-site to the
selected one target base-site responsive to the response to the source
base-site.




17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


20~9365~
'O 92/06543 P(~r/US91/05796




COMMUNICATION TRANSFER IN A
RADIOTELEPHONE SYSTEM

Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to cellular
radiotelephone systems, and more particularly to cellular
radiotelephone systems requiring communication transfer
10 for call maintenance.

B ackground of the Invention

15 In cellular radiotelephone systems, handoff of a
mobile is required to maintain communication to the
mobile as it moves from cell to cell in the system. Handoff
is the process of transferring a call in progress from one RF
coverage area to another in coordination with the
2 0 movement of the mobile. It is also the process whereby a
call is transferred to another channel within a RF coverage
area because of interference within the coverage area.
The process of handing off a call in progress is one of the
most delicately balanced function related to cellular
2 5 radiotelephone systems because it requires a high level of
coordination among the various system processing
elements to ensure successful operation. Failure to hand a
call off at the proper time generally results in a reduction
in the call quantity, interference with neighboring


_F

WO 92/06543 2 0 8 9 3 6 5 Pcr/ussl/o579




coverage areas and even the undesired termination of the
call.
Current analog cellular radiotelephone systems
require that the system continuously monitor the quality
5 of every call which is operational on the system. The
system must recognize when the quality of a call falls
below a predetermined threshold in a particular coverage
area and must also determine what other coverage area
can satisfactorily handle the call. Once a more suitable
10 coverage area is identified, the system sends instructions
to the mobile directing it to another channel. The mobile
confirms that it is leaving its current channel, tunes to the
new channel, synchronizes to the new channel and begins
transmitting thereby confirming that it has arrived on the
15 new channel.
In digital cellular radiotelephone systems, the
procedure is modified somewhat in that the mobile is
capable of measuring other channels as instructed by the
system as well as its current channel and also that the
2 0 mobile reports this information back to the system. These
measurements consist of signal strength only and are
relative as the measured results are likely to vary
considerably due to varying environmental conditions.
Because of this and because the mobile cannot determine
2 5 if the measurement is that of an interferer or the correct
channel, the system must scan the cell selected by the
mobile.
Another factor to consider in the handoff process is
in current cellular radiotelephone systems, the

~vo 92/06s43 Pcr/US9l/0~796

208936~




radiotelephone switch receives a handoff request from the
source base-site and relays the message to potential target
base-sites. The target base-sites will monitor the quality
of tr~ncmi ssion of the mobile and if the required
5 conditions are met, the target base-site will respond back
to the radiotelephone switch to let it know it is a good
candidate. During this time, the radiotelephone switch
waits a predetermined period of time to receive additional
responses from all other potential target base-sites. If no
10 responses are received from any target base-sites, the
radiotelephone switch will relay a message to the source
base-site to increase the signal level level of the mobile
unit. The source base-site knows that a given signal level
step translates to a known signal level increase at the
15 mobile thus the source base-site sets the signal level step
accordingly. The source base-site again takes signal
quality measurements on the tr~nsmission of the mobile
and the entire process is repeated. This process of
constantly requesting a handoff when the handoff
2 0 condition has been met tends to overload the
radiotelephone switch since handoff information is
continuously being transferred throughout the system.
Still other systems have base-sites sending all
received signal strength measurements back to the
2 5 radiotelephone switch on a continuous basis to speed the
handoff process. This method, however, creates a large
amount of signal strength data traffic which the switch
must preserve.

wo 92/06543 Pcr/US91/05796


4 208936S

Thus, a need exists for a handoff procedure which
extends the time period that a target base-site has to
report back to the source base-site while maintaining
efficient throughput at the radiotelephone switch.




S~1mm~ry of the Invention

A radiotelephone system has a mobile unit
10 communicating to a source base-site wherein the mobile
unit requires a communication transfer from the source
base-site to a selected one target base-site. The
radiotelephone system obtains, at the source base-site, a
first signal quality value of a signal received by the source
15 base-site, provides a second signal quality value and
provides at least a first predetermined time period and a
second predetermined time period. The radiotelephone
system, at at least the selected one target base-site,
obtains a third signal quality value of a signal received by
20 at least the selected one target base-site. The
radiotelephone system, at at least the selected one target
base-site, compares the f*st signal quality value to the
third signal quality value during the first time period, and compares the
second signal quality value to the third signal quality value during the
2 5 second time period, and responsive to the comparison, transfers
communication from the source base-site to at least the selected one
target base-site during at least the first predetermined time period or the
second time period.

2089365
~o 92/06s43 PCr/ussl/0s796




Brief Description of the Drawings

FIG. 1 generally depicts an idealized geographic
layout of a digital radiotelephone system.
FIG. 2 depicts a mobile unit communicating to a
source base-site and moving toward two candidate target
base-sites .
FIGS. 3A-3C, together, is a flow diagram of the steps
the digital radiotelephone system takes to transfer
communication of the mobile unit in accordance with the
invention .
FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram of the source base-site
and the target base-sites.

Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment

A typical configuration in a cellular communication
system is shown in FIG. 1. A source cell 100 contains a
source base-site and is bounded by target cells 101
through 106 containing six separate target base-sites. The
source cell 100 contains the mobile that is traveling within
the boundary of the source cell 100.
FIG. 2 shows a magnified view of the source cell 100
and potential target cells 101 and 102. The source base-
site 200 and the target base-sites 205 and 210 are coupled
together through the base-site interface 220. The base-
site interface 220 typically has input lines from the public

wo 92/06543 2 0 8 9 3 6 5 Pcr/ussl/o579




service telephone network. The mobile 225 is
communicating to the source base-site 200 throughout the
boundary of the source cell 100 and moves toward target
cells 101 and 102.
FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of the handoff process the
system undergoes as the mobile 225 moves away from the
source base-site 200 to which it is communicating toward
the target base-sites 205, 210. Referring to FIG. 3A, the
handoff process starts at 300 when the source base-site
1 0 200 measures at 301 a first (source) signal quality value
and stores the data. The signal quality value is a received
signal strength indication (RSSI) in the preferred
embodiment. A test is then performed at 303 to
determine if a first (source) signal quality value, RSSIS, is
1 5 greater than the transfer threshold. Although in the
preferred embodiment only one threshold is incorporated,
two or more thresholds may be incorporated to initialize
the handoff procedure before the absolute lower-level
threshold is reached by the source base-site 200. Use of
2 0 two thresholds would increase call quality since a handoff
could occur at higher source base-site 200 receiver
sensitivities. Continuing, if RSSIS is greater, the source
base-site 200 will continue to measure at 301 RSSIS and
store the data. If RSSIS is below the transfer threshold, a
second (forecasted) signal quality value, RSSIF, is
calculated at 306. RSSIF is a signal level value that the
source base-site 200 would expect to receive if the power
of the mobile were increased. The source base-site 200 is
capable of calculating RSSIF because it knows the

2089365
'O 92/06543 PC~r/US91/0~796




correlation between the power increase value it would
send the mobile 225 and the would be power. A test is
then performed at 309 to see if the mobile 225, which has
been monitoring for viable target base-sites 205, 210, has
indicated any target base-sites 205, 210. If no viable
target base-sites 205, 210 were found by the mobile 225,
the power of the mobile 225 is increased at 312 and the
source base-site 200 continues to measure at 301 RSSIS
and store the data. If the mobile 225 does indicate viable
1 0 target base-sites 205, 210, a handoff request which
includes the target base-site 205, 210 information, RSSIS
and RSSIF are sent at 315 to the base-site interface 220
and the first predetermined time period (X) and second
predetermined time period (W) timers at the source base-
1 5 site 200 are reset. In the preferred embodiment, the X
time period is a 1-5 second time period the source base-
site 200 will wait for the base-site interface 220 to
respond; the base site interface 220 only responds if it
receives a response from a target base-site 205, 210. In
2 0 the preferred embodiment, the W time period is a 7
second time period the source base-site 200 will wait for
the base-site interface 220 to respond. The base-site
interface 220 receives at 318 the handoff request, sends
RSSIS and RSSIF to the viable target base-sites 205, 210
located by the mobile 225 and resets its own X and W
timers, which are both the same time period as the source
base-site 200 X and W timers but slightly delayed
compared to those of the source base-site 200. The target
base-sites 205, 210 receive at 321 the message and

WO 92/06543 2 0 8 9 3 6 5 Pcr/ussl/o57~




measure a third (target) signa~ quality value, RSSIT, of the
mobile 225.
Turning to FIG. 3B, a test is performed at 324 to
determine if the digital voice color code (DVCC) is valid for
5 the mobile 225. The DVCC is a binary code given to the
mobile 225 to distinguish it from other mobiles in the
same or surrounding cells; in the preferred embodiment, it
is used to ensure the target base-sites 205, 210 are
measuring RSSI of the same mobile 225 that the source
1 0 base-site 200 measured. If DVCC is valid for the mobile
225, a test is then performed at 326 to determine if RSSIT
is greater than RSSIS plus a hysteresis value. The
hysteresis value is a value predetermined by the system
designer which accounts for the different physical
1 5 locations of the source base-site 200 and target base-sites
205, 210, and can be positive, negative or zero. If RSSIT is
greater than RSSIS plus the hysteresis value, a response is
sent at 340 to the base-site interface 220 from the target
base-sites 205, 210 which have RSSIT greater than RSSIS
20 plus the hysteresis value. If, from above, DVCC was not
valid or RSSIT is not greater than RSSIS plus the hysteresis
value, the target base-sites 205, 210 re-measure at 330
RSSIT. During this time and essentially in the background,
the X timer at the source base-site 200 is timing the
25 process and will increase the power of the mobile 225 if
the X time period expires before the source base 200
receives a response from the base-site interface 220.
Continuing, the test at 324 to check for DVCC validity of
the mobile 225 is repeated. If DVCC is valid, a test is

2089365
vo 92/06s43 PCT/USgl/05796




performed at 333 to determine if RSSIT is greater than
RSSIF. If RSSIT is greater than RSSIF, a response is sent at
340 to the base-site interface 220 from the target base-
sites 205, 210 which have RSSIT greater than RSSIF. If
5 RSSIT is not greater than RSSIF, a check is done at 336 to
determine if the W time period has expired at the source
base-site 200. If the W time period has not expired, the
re-measurement at 330 is repeated. If the W time period
has expired, the handoff process will end at 339 in the
1 0 source base-site 200.
Referring to ~IG. 3C, if a target base-site 205, 210
responds to the base-site interface 220 during either the X
or W time period at the base-site interface 220, a test is
performed at 341 to determined if the handoff process is
1 5 in the X or W time period. If the process is in the X time
period, the base-site interface 220 selects at 343 the best
target base-site 205, 210 after the X time period expires.
If the process is in the W time period, the base-site
interface 220 will assign at 348 a channel to the selected
2 0 target base-site 205, 210 and notify that target base-site
205, 210 of the channel. The selected target base-site 205,
210 then powers up at 357 to that channel and responds
back to the base-site interface 220. The base-site
interface 220 notifies at 360 the source base-site 200 of
2 5 the handoff response and the source base-site 200 re-
measures RSSIS at 362. A test is then performed at 363 to
determine whether RSSIT is still greater than RSSIS. If
RSSIT is below RSSIS, the source base-site 200 stops at 366
RSSIS the handoff process and sends a corresponding

2089~65
W O 92/06543 PC~r/US91/0579




message to the base-site interface 220. If RSSIT is still
greater than RSSIS, the sourcé base-site 200 will send at
369 a handoff message to the mobile 225. The mobile 225
acknowledgement of the handoff message is received at
370 and the source base-site 200 sends a clear message to
the base-site interface 220. The mobile 225 tunes to the
new channel and the selected target base-site 205, 210
informs the base-site interface 220 at 372 that the mobile
225 is being received. Handoff of the mobile 225 from the
1 0 source base-site 200 to the selected target base-site 205,
210 has thus been completed.
FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram of the source base-site
200 and the target base-sites 205, 210. A conventional
interface 400 interfaces between a processor 405 and the
1 5 base-site interface 220. The processor, which is a
Motorola 68302 microprocessor in the preferred
embodiment, is coupled to conventional memory 420 and
also transmitter/receivers 410. The processor 405
controls the functions of the source base-site 200 and the
2 0 target base-sites 205, 210 while the transmitter/receivers
410 provide an interface to the external RF environment.
If both the X and W time periods expire before
communication transfer is required, the source base-site
200 may request a re-initialization of the process of FIG. 3.
Significant to the process of FIG. 3 is the fact that the
handoff process is given a greater chance to be completed
with the same amount of handoff requests sent by the
source base-site 200, resulting in an improved handoff

2089365
PC~r/US91/05796
'O 92/06543




method while maintaining efficient base-site interface 220
throu ghput .
What I claim is:

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 1996-06-11
(86) PCT Filing Date 1991-08-16
(87) PCT Publication Date 1992-03-28
(85) National Entry 1993-02-11
Examination Requested 1993-02-11
(45) Issued 1996-06-11
Deemed Expired 2003-08-18

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-02-11
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 1993-08-16 $100.00 1993-06-24
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-08-13
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 1994-08-16 $100.00 1994-06-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 1995-08-16 $100.00 1995-06-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 5 1996-08-16 $150.00 1996-06-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 6 1997-08-18 $150.00 1997-07-11
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 7 1998-08-17 $150.00 1998-07-06
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 1999-08-16 $150.00 1999-07-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2000-08-16 $150.00 2000-07-04
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2001-08-16 $200.00 2001-06-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MOTOROLA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
FELIX, KENNETH A.
HARDMAN, SCOTT A.
HART, THOMAS B.
HULSEBOSCH, THOMAS G.
WERRONEN, ALTON P.
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 1994-05-14 1 17
Abstract 1995-08-17 1 58
Claims 1994-05-14 6 146
Drawings 1994-05-14 5 119
Description 1994-05-14 11 350
Abstract 1996-06-11 1 52
Description 1996-06-11 11 367
Claims 1996-06-11 6 167
Cover Page 1996-06-11 1 20
Drawings 1996-06-11 5 108
Representative Drawing 1998-07-30 1 7
International Preliminary Examination Report 1993-02-11 9 286
PCT Correspondence 1996-04-04 1 32
Prosecution Correspondence 1995-12-08 3 167
Examiner Requisition 1995-06-16 2 88
Fees 1996-06-26 1 35
Fees 1995-06-26 1 101
Fees 1994-06-22 1 98
Fees 1993-06-24 1 91