Language selection

Search

Patent 2094381 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2094381
(54) English Title: DECODING OF COMPOSITE TELEVISION SIGNALS
(54) French Title: DECODAGE DE SIGNAUX DE TELEVISION COMPOSITES
Status: Dead
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04N 5/21 (2006.01)
  • H04N 5/205 (2006.01)
  • H04N 9/64 (2006.01)
  • H04N 17/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CROLL, MICHAEL G. (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • CROLL, MICHAEL G. (Not Available)
  • BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION (United Kingdom)
(71) Applicants :
(74) Agent: RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1992-08-20
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1993-02-22
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB1992/001532
(87) International Publication Number: WO1993/004563
(85) National Entry: 1993-04-19

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
9118057.0 United Kingdom 1991-08-21

Abstracts

English Abstract

2094381 9304563 PCTABS00020
A broadcast system is provided in which the effects of
differential distortions on composite television signals are reduced. At
predetermined intervals, the broadcast signal includes a test
signal having high frequency components at least three average video
signal levels. In a suitably equipped receiver, following
demodulation by the receivers vision demodulator (20), a test signal is
identified by a test signal detector (34). Measurement apparatus
(24) then measures the distortion of the test signal at a number
of different average video signal levels, calculates the
correction required to minimise the effect of distortion at each measured
signal level, and stores the corrections in a memory (28) at
address locations derived from the demodulated signal by a filter
circuit (32). The stored corrections are applied to an interpolator
(40) which derives further corrections for other average video
signal levels, the derived corrections being applied to
subsequently received television signals by a controllable equaliser (38).


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WO 93/04563 PCT/GB92/01532

CLAIMS

1. A method for reducing the effect of differential
distortion on demodulated composite television signals,
comprising the steps of:
broadcasting a test signal at predetermined intervals, the
test signal including a component at at least one average video
signal level;
receiving the test signal at a receiver, the receiver
being adapted to carry out the steps of:
measuring the distortion of the video signal at the said
at least one average video signal level;
deriving the required correction at that signal level; and
applying the said derived required correction to subsequently
received broadcast video signals at that signal level.
2. A method according to claim 1, in which the test signal
includes components at at least three average video signal levels
and in which a required correction is derived for each such
level.

3. A method according to claim 2, in which measured values
for distortion of the test signal are interpolated or
extrapolated to derive the required correction at signal levels
other than the average video signal levels of the measured test
signal components.

4. A method according to claim 1, in which the required
correction derived and applied includes correction of phase and
amplitude distortions present in the demodulated television
signal.

5. A method according to claim 1, in which the required
correction is derived and applied at a number of different
frequencies.

6. A method according to claim 1, in which successive test
signals are stored and averaged with the preceding test signal

- 8 -

WO 93/04563 PCT/GB92/01532

and the required correction is derived from the measured
distortion of the averaged test signal.

7. A method according to claim 1, in which successive derived
corrections for a given average video signal level are averaged
and the correction subsequently applied to broadcast video
signals is the averaged correction for that average video signal
level.

8. A method according to claim 1, in which the or each
required correction is applied to the video signal in its
composite form.

9. A method according to claim 2, in which the average video
signal levels at which required corrections are applied are
closely spaced such that no visible additional distortions are
added to the signal.

10. A test signal for use in a method according to claim 1,
comprising one line of a composite television signal having an
identifying portion to identify it as a test signal and having
high frequency components at at least three average video signal
levels.

11. A test signal according to claim 10, including a
chrominance burst preceding the said high frequency components
thereof.

12. A test signal according to claim 11, in which the
chrominance burst has a duration of at least 20 microseconds.

13. A composite television signal including, at predetermined
intervals, a test signal according to claim 10.

14. A receiver adapted to receive and demodulate a composite
television signal, including:
a test signal detector operable to detect a test signal
broadcast at predetermined intervals;

- 9 -

WO 93/04563 PCT/GB92/01532
measurement apparatus adapted to determine the level of
differential amplitude and/or phase distortion of the received
test signal at at least one average video signal level and to
derive the correction required to reduce the distortion at that
signal level or levels;
storage means connected to receive the derived required
correction or corrections; and
signal processing apparatus adapted to apply the required
correction or corrections to subsequently received television
signals at the average video signal level or levels for which the
correction or corrections was derived.

15. Apparatus according to claim 14, in which the signal
processing apparatus includes an interpolator configured to
derive the required correction for average video signal levels
other than the at least one average video signal level at which
the distortion is determined by the measurement apparatus, the
derived required corrections being applied to subsequently
received television signals by the signal processing apparatus.

16. Apparatus according to claim 14, in which the measurement
apparatus is adapted to determine the level of distortion of the
received test signal at at least three average video signal
levels and to determine a required correction for each such
signal level.

17. Apparatus according to claim 14, including an analogue to
digital converter through which the received test signal is
passed, in which the measurement apparatus and storage means are
implemented in digital circuitry.

18. Apparatus according to claim 17, in which the measurement
apparatus comprises a programmable read-only memory device.

19. Apparatus according to claim 17, in which the storage
means comprises a memory device in which the derived required
correction or corrections are stored at address locations
determined by the average luminance level of the received test

- 10 -

WO 93/04563 PCT/GB92/01532
signal.

20. Apparatus according to claim 19, including at least one
filter through which the analogue test signal is passed to derive
the luminance level thereof.

21. Apparatus according to claim 14, including further storage
means adapted to store a received test signal, to compare a
subsequently received test signal with the stored test signal and
to derive an average test signal therefrom, the measurement
apparatus being adapted to determine the level of distortion of
the average test signal.

22. Apparatus according to claim 14, including additional
storage means adapted to compare a subsequently derived
correction for a given average video signal level with a stored
derived correction for that average video signal level, the
signal processing apparatus being adapted to apply the averaged
derived correction to subsequently received television signals.

23. A receiver adapted to receive and demodulate a composite
television signal, including high speed computer circuitry
programmed to effect correction of the effects of differential
distortion on a demodulated composite television signal in
accordance with the method of claim 1.

24. A composite television broadcast transmitter including
means for modulating and transmitting a composite television
signal according to claim 13.

25. A composite television broadcasting system comprising a
transmitter according to claim 24 and at least one receiver
according to claim 14.

- 11 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


. ~vo 93/04563 2 0 9 ~ 3 81 PCT/CB92/01532


DECODING OF COMPOSITE TELEYISION SIGNALS

Technical Field:
The present invention relates to the field of composite
television broadcasting systems and in particular to a method and
apparatus for reducing the effect of differential distortions on
demodulated broadcast video signals.

Back~round Art:
It is a known problem of PAL, NTSC and other similar
composite tele~ision broadcasting systems that the broadcast
signal is often subject to amplitude and phase distortions.
These distortions are usually introduced to the signal as a
result of modulation of the signal onto a high frequency c~rrier
signal prior to transmission and demodulation of the transmitted
signal at the receiver. Several factors contributing to the
distortion of the video signal are influenced by the mean level
of the modulated signal carrier with the result that, when the
video signal is demodulated, the distortions become differential
distortions which vary with the mean level of the signal.
While these distortions are allowed for in the design of
known composite television signal receivers, by the use of
delay-line decoders and a saturation control in PAL system
receivers and by the use of hue and saturation controls in ~TSC
receivers, these measures allow only an average correction to be
applied. In order to improve the quality of signal that can be
delivered by~e~isting-terrestrial television systems and by new
television systeims which use the established.composite coded
signal methods, improved receivers employing more accurate
distortion correction methods are required.
... . . . . . . . . . . - . .
- - . .. - . ........ . .. . . . . ....... .
Disclosure of Invention~
; '' In accordance with the present-invention, there is
provided a method~for reducing the effect of differential
; distortion on demodulated composite television signals,
comprising the steps of:


. .-
.... , . - . . ..


.. . - .
.. - . . . . - . . .
., . ~ . -
~ -. : - - : . ~

~ .

W O 93/U4563 381 PCT/CB92/01532

broadcasting a test signal at predetermined intervals, the
test signal including a component at at least one average video
signal level;
receiving the test signal at a receiver, the receiver
being adapted to carry out the steps of:
measuring the distortion of the video signal at the said
at least one average video signal level;
deriving the required correction at that signal level; and
applying the said derived required correction to subsequently
received broadcast video signals at that signal level.
The present invention also provides a test signal for use
in the above method, comprising one line of a composite
television signal having an identifying portion to identify it as
a test signal and having high frequency components at at least
three average video signal levels. ,
The test signal may be transmitted once per frame or over r-
a longer period with successive test signals being spaced by
several seconds. , ,
The method of the present invention may include the step
of measuring the amplitude and phase distortion for a range of
average video signal levels of the test signal and deriving a
correction to be applied to subsequently received broadcast
signals for each such distortion at each of the measured average
video signal levels. Thus, if the levels of demodulated '
chrominance are significantly reduced at high average signal
levels (i.e. close to peak white) by distortion of the signal
during modulation, transmission and demodulation, the effect of
these distortions mayibe corrected by increasing the chrominance
gain when the signal level is high. These corrections are ;
preferably applied.to the signal,in ,its com,posite form to allow ,
the level of high-frequency luminance (picture detail) to be
corrected also. ,,The correction may be derived and applied at a
number OI different frequencies to improve the accuracy of the
luminance correction. ,~
. ,., ,The derived,corrections may be interpolated or
extrapolated to derive the correction to,be applied at average
,,,~,video signal levels other than the signal levels of the test
signal components. , , -




' ' ' ' '

2 0 9 4 3 8 1 ! .
W O 93/0~563 PCT/GB92/01532

Preferably, the corrections are applied to subsequentlyreceived broadcast signals at closely spaces signal levels to
give a smoothly varying correction which adds no visible
distortions to the broadcast signal.
Also in accordance with the present invention there is '
provided a receiver adapted to receive and demodulate a composite
television signal, including: -'
a test signal detector operable to detect a test signal
broadcast at predetermined intervals;
measurement apparatus adapted to determine the level of
differential amplitude and/or phase distortion of the received ;
test signal at at least one average video signal level and to
derive the correction required to reduce the distortion at that
signal level or levels;
.. . .
storage means connected to receive the derived required -
correction or corrections; and ,L~
- signal processing apparatus adapted to apply the required
correction or corrections to subsequently received television
signals at the average video signal level or levels for which the
correction or corrections was derived.
The receiver operates to derive and apply corrections in
the way described above. The apparatus may be implemented in
analogue or digital'circuitry or, where the receiver includes a
high speed computer, certain of the apparatus operations may be
' implemented in software.
' ' '' ~ The present invention provides a broadcast'system,
including a transmitter configured to modulate and transmit a
' composite'television'signal'including t~e test signal, and at
least one receiver'of the type described above. In such a :
' ' broadcast system differential distortion of the broadcast signals '
., . - . -, . - . . . ~ . . . . .
' may be corrected more accurately than by the average correction '
methods currently known and used. '
~,

' ~rief DescriPtion of Drawinqs: '
.. . , .................... .... . , .................... .
One particular preferred embodiment of the present
' invention will now be described, by way of e~ample only, with
reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a general schematic diagram of the correction

- 3 -


: ~ . - . . . - . .:

.

W 0 93/04563 43 8 ~ PCT/G892/OlS32

derivation and application stages of the receiver of the present
invention;
Figure 2 shows two suitable forms of the test signal of
the present invention; and
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram showing the receiver
stages of Figure 1 implemented in digital circuitry.

Modes for CarrYinq Out the Invention:
Referring initially to Figure 2, two suitable forms of
test signals according to the preser.t invention are shown. Both
signals, employed to correct chrominance errors, are in the form
of a broadcast line signal including high frequency components
; which may be measured at at least three different average video
signal levels. The first signal lOA shown in Figure 2A, is in
the form of a television line ramp and the second lOB, in Figure
2B, is in the form of a television line staircase. Both signals
shown are ausmented by a subcarrier.
i; Signals of this type are easy to detect, being identified
by a preceding chrominance burst 12 of at least 20 microseconds
duration.
The circuitry measuring the test signal distortion and
deriving the corrections required to minimise its effect includes ~ -
storage for the corrections to allow them to be applied to
successive received television broadcast signals.~ It is
therefore the case that the test signal, which sets up the stored
corrections, need ~e transmitted only sufficiently often to
ensure that there is no appreciable delay in obtaining a good
picture after the viewer has changed channel or after a change in
received signal quality as a result of changes to the signal path
for distribution, transmission or reception.~ Accordingly,
whilst the test signal may be transmitted once per frame, lower
repetition frequencies such as once per second or once per ten
seconds may be used.
The receiver circuitry which derives and applies the '
required correction of amplitude and phase distortion affecting
one signal frequency (colour subcarrier) at different average
video signal levels is shown in Figure 1.
The television broadcast signal, including at periodic




. - : .
,

~VO 93/0~563 2 0 9 ~ 3 81 PCT/G892/01532

intervals the test signal, is received and demodulated by the
receivers vision demodulator 20. The demodulated signal 22 is
applied to measurement apparatus 24 which measures the difference
between the chrominance level of the received (distorted) signal
and an expected chrominance level for the transmitted test signal
and derives a correction which will minimise the effect of the
distortion. The derived corrections 26 are then stored in a
memory 28 at address locations 30 determined by the average
luminance level of the demodulated signal 22. The average
luminance level, and hence the memory address locations 30, are
derived by passing the demodulated signal 22 through a suitable
low-pass filter arrangement 32. -
To ensure that only corrections derived from a receivedtest signal are stored in the memory 28, a test signal detector
34 is provided. ~ When a test signal is received, identified as- - -
such by the preceding 20 us chrominance burst 12 (Figure 2), the
detector ~4 generates a writ~F~-enable signal 36 which allows
derived corrections to be written into the memory 28 for the
duration of the test signal.
The stored corrections are applied to subse~uently
received television broadcast signals by a controllable equaliser
38. Control of the equaliser 38 may be achieved by a number of
established methods.
The stored corrections are passed through an interpolator
40 prior to application by the ëqualiser 38. The interpolator ' -
40 derives further required corrections to be applied at average
video signal levels other than those fo,r which the measurement
apparatus 24 measured the distortion'of the test signal. Use of ¦
the interpolator 40 allows the corrections to be applied at
closely spaced average video signal levels to provide a smoothly
varying correction which àdds no'visible additional distortions
to the video signal. -
- ~''`" A more'detaiied-implementation of'the receiver circuitry
is shown in Figure 3. In the circuitry shown, the distortion is
measured and the corrections derived from the test signal of
Figure 2A (the television line ramp). The output from the
receivers vision demodulator 20 is digitised by an analogue to
digital converter 42: this allows the subsequent measurement and

93/04563 20~38~ PCl`tGB92/01532.

correction stages to be defined in terms of known digital
operations although it will be appreciated that some of these
stages could be implemented in analogue circuitry.
The digitised output from the analogue to digital
converter g2 is applied to a chrominance demodulator 44. The
chrominance demodulator 44, which could be the normal receiver
demodulator, is shown in Figure 3 as a separate demodulator for
the sake of clarity.
The demodulated chrominance components U,V are applied to
the measurement apparatus 24. The amplitude of the demodulated
signal is calculated, in a PROM (programmable read-only memory)
24A, as the root of the sum of the squares of the two demodulated
colour components U,V. The phase of the demodulated signal is
also calculated in a PROM 24P as the inverse tan ratio of the two
demodulated colour components U,V. These two measurements 26A,
26P which define the corrections to be applied to a subsequently
received broadcast signal are then stored in amplitude and phase
correction memories 28A, 28P respectively.
As described previously, the corrections are stored at
memory address locations 30 derived from the average luminance
level of the demodulated signal by a low pass filter 32. As also
described, these corrections may only be stored when a
write-enable signal 36 from a test signal detector 34 indicates
the presence of a test signal.
Following interpolation by respective amplitude and phase
interpolators 40A, 40P the corrections are applied to a
~ , .. . .. . . . . .
controllable egualiser 38. The equaliser 38 is an adjustable
transversal equaliser having a signal input 50 for the
demodulated broadcasL video signal and separate symmetric 52 and
- - - .. ..
anti-symmetric 54 control inputs. The amplitude correction
signal is applied to the symmetric control input 52: amplitude
correction is achieved by varying the size of the signal I -
coefficients symmetrically about the centre of the filter. The
phase correction signal i5 applied to the anti-sy~metric control
input 54: phase correction is achieved by varying the size of the
-
~: signal coefficients anti-symmetrically about the centre of the ¦
filter.
In order to reduce the sensitivity of the circuitry to
., . I



. .

.: : '' ; ,

. ~ ~

W O 93/045~3 2 0 9 ~ ~ ~ 1 PCT/C~/0153~ ~

disturbances which may affect the received test signal, averaging
circuits (not shown) may be provided around the correction
memories 28A, 28P. Such averaging circuits may average
successive test signals prior to measurement of distortion or may
average successively derived corrections for a given average
video signal level.
It is envisaged that new designs of broadcast receiver,
which include means for improving the quality of the received
television signal, will include a wide range of sophisticated
circuits. The present invention provides such means for
improving the quality without requiring a significant increase in
receiver circuitry.
It will be appreciated that, where the receiver apparatus
includes high-speed computing capability, the method of the
present invention may be impiemented in software. In such a
case, the schematic diagrams of figures l and 3 may be regarded
as flow charts representing the steps of a software decoding and
correction process.
The decoding and correction circuitry of the present
invention may also include means for correcting static losses
within the receiver to compensate for multipath effects, receiver
; and/or transmitter responses'and the''low'frequency effects of
mistuning. ' ' '
.. .- . . . ,~ . .,. :. ... ..
~'' ' ' , . . .
....... . .
.i .
,,, ~.. . ,
.' ' ' - . - - . .

.. j;..
.
,. ~, . . . . , . . . .. ' .. ... .. .. _ _ .. _ .. ,_ ~,, .. . .. .
.' ' '"'",.'", . ~




- 7 -

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date Unavailable
(86) PCT Filing Date 1992-08-20
(87) PCT Publication Date 1993-02-22
(85) National Entry 1993-04-19
Dead Application 1995-02-21

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $0.00 1993-04-19
Registration of a document - section 124 $0.00 1993-10-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CROLL, MICHAEL G.
BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
International Preliminary Examination Report 1993-04-19 4 117
Office Letter 1993-07-15 1 89
Representative Drawing 1998-11-06 1 10
Abstract 1993-02-22 1 70
Drawings 1993-02-22 3 55
Claims 1993-02-22 4 157
Abstract 1993-02-22 1 54
Cover Page 1993-02-22 1 16
Description 1993-02-22 7 335